Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
dbcooper41 wrote:i wonder if the porn belonged to the right handed or the left handed onan been loadin.
perhaps this explains why the seals claimed he was shooting?
please pardon my immaturity, this is getting pretty silly to me.
barracuda wrote:It would surprise me more if the-whoever-they-killed the other day didn't have any porn. All men do.
Besides which, if this is propaganda, it's probably backfired. The fact that terrorists look at pornography humanises them in my eyes.
Scott Horton Interviews Kelley B. Vlahos
Scott Horton, April 16, 2010
Featured Antiwar.com columnist Kelley B. Vlahos discusses the resurgence of Bacha Bazi and the sexual exploitation of boys in Afghanistan, Canadian soldiers who were rebuffed by superiors when reporting abuse by their Afghan comrades, US withdrawal from a long-held remote Afghan outpost and the increasingly obvious futility of US and NATO humanitarian efforts and the occupation in general.
MP3 here. (42:14)
http://dissentradio.com/radio/10_04_15_vlahos.mp3
Kelley Beaucar Vlahos, a Washington, D.C.-based freelance writer, is a longtime political reporter for FoxNews.com, a contributing editor at The American Conservative magazine and featured Antiwar.com columnist. She is also a Washington correspondent for Homeland Security Today magazine.
http://antiwar.com/radio/2010/04/16/kelley-b-vlahos-7/
barracuda wrote:It would surprise me more if the-whoever-they-killed the other day didn't have any porn. All men do.
Besides which, if this is propaganda, it's probably backfired. The fact that terrorists look at pornography humanises them in my eyes.
Luposapien wrote:Not saying that it hasn't been done, because if you can think of something stupid to do, then you can probably guarantee that someone, somewhere is doing it, but I'm trying to grasp the logic behind a would-be terrorist using, of all things, child porn as a cover for their communications. I guess the only think I can think of is that they're trying to exploit pre-established networks that already operate off or below the grid, but if there's anyone more despised by the public at large than "terrorists", it's people involved in the production and distribution of child porn. Doesn't it seem like this is just begging for the unwanted attention of even more law enforcement types?
82_28 wrote:Unless you're of the fundie christian set to which all this pro-war madness and racism is directed towards anyhow. The critical mass.
barracuda wrote:82_28 wrote:Unless you're of the fundie christian set to which all this pro-war madness and racism is directed towards anyhow. The critical mass.
I thought the whole mythos of "the killing of Bin Laden" was supposed to lock in the Democratic base for Obama in '12.
barracuda wrote:Maybe they understand that certain aspects of the child-porn industry are almost certainly protected and veiled by the very law enforcement agencies whose job it is to discover terror networks, sort of like using drug-smuggling networks as terrorist communication mules.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests