Berlet: Conspiracies, Demonization & Scapegoating

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby chiggerbit » Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:14 pm

Lane's allegations joined those of other conspiracy theorists after the tragedy, including those of the Church of Scientology, John Judge, Jim Hougan[30], Jack Anderson [32] and a trio of Soviet authors.[33]


You know, as I read up on this, I've been totally skipping over how the Soviets keep popping up in the Jonestown saga, and it suddenly dawned on me that the Scientologists aren't the only ones who might have an agenda in pushing conspiracy agenda, especially with regard to Jonestown. Why have I never considered that they might possibly be among the players? My eyes seem to skip right over the word "Soviets" as if it's invisible. Now I'm curious to know if Co$ has ever flirted with the Russians.
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chiggerbit » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:00 pm

I've never heard of this dude before, so I really have no clue as to his credibility. And I take back my charge of opportunism with regards to Congressman Ryan.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 94_pf.html

Town Without Pity
30 Years Later, Memories of Jonestown Evoke Guilt, Anger and Mistrust

By Charles A. Krause
Special to The Washington Post
Wednesday, November 19, 2008; C01


SAN FRANCISCO, Nov. 18


Jackie Speier now represents California's 12th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives. The last time I saw her, 30 years ago, her bloody, bullet-riddled body lay in tall grass at the side of a jungle airstrip in Port Kaituma, Guyana.

She had been gunned down by four assassins sent by the Rev. Jim Jones to kill congressman Leo J. Ryan -- and the rest of us who had accompanied him to investigate reports of violence, torture and sexual abuse in a place called Jonestown.

For 15 hours, Speier and the others who miraculously survived the airport massacre waited to be rescued, bleeding and fearful the gunmen would return. Meanwhile, five miles away, Jones was ordering more than 900 of his followers to commit "revolutionary suicide" by drinking fruit-flavored punch laced with poison.

Jones's exhortation to his followers, to "die with dignity," and a survivor's account of Jonestown's final hour -- "they started with the babies" -- became headlines sent around the world. Overnight, Jonestown would become more than a name or geographic location; it became shorthand for troubling questions about cults, the social and sexual revolution then underway in the United States, and the mixture of politics and religion that Jim Jones used so effectively to lure thousands of followers into his church and to hoodwink much of San Francisco's political establishment.

On Tuesday, 30 years to the day after the horrific events that resulted in Ryan's assassination, the deaths of three journalists and the mass suicide-murder, some 200 Jonestown survivors, relatives of those who died, television crews and journalists gathered at a mass grave in Oakland's Evergreen Cemetery, where 406 unidentified bodies from Jonestown, mostly children, are buried.

The Rev. Jynona Norwood, a black evangelical preacher from Los Angeles who lost her mother and 26 other members of her immediate family in Jonestown, asked the mourners to "reflect on the lives of our loved ones who trusted in a man who was the most evil man who walked the face of the Earth."

The memorial service was just one of a number of events, in the San Francisco area and nationally, commemorating Jonestown's 30th anniversary. Renewed interest has been fanned by two new television documentaries and a play, "The People's Temple," now touring regional theaters. For those too young to remember Jonestown, the mass suicide-murder has become a part of pop culture. Brian Jonestown Massacre is the name of a rock group. And "drink the Kool-Aid" has entered the popular lexicon for a toxic kind of malleability, a reference to my first reports from Jonestown for The Washington Post quoting Odell Rhodes, a Jonestown survivor, saying that the potion drunk or injected into those who died was a mixture of cyanide and Kool-Aid.

Many of the Jonestown survivors and their families find the Kool-Aid references and jokes insensitive and deeply hurtful -- reminders of the tragedy they suffered and, worse still, the widely held perception that the men, women and children in Jonestown were a bunch of crazies who willingly committed suicide out of blind devotion to their leader.

"The whole world looked at us as a bunch of kooks, that we were borderline people, uneducated and unstable," Debbie Layton, whose escape from Jonestown in May 1978 set in motion the tragedy that followed, recalled Sunday. "People think that all the people just drank the Kool-Aid," she said. "They have no idea of what that means or what happened. They just laugh about it."

Much more is known today about the inner workings of the Peoples Temple than was known in the immediate aftermath of Jonestown. For example, many of those who died that day were highly educated. And at least some did, in fact, commit suicide. But there is clear evidence that armed guards loyal to Jones forced mothers to poison their children and gave adults a choice: Drink the deadly potion or be shot. And it later turned out that Flavor Aid, not Kool-Aid, was mixed with the cyanide, a minor footnote to the larger tragedy that transfixed the nation, indeed the world, in 1978.

As Norwood and others who spoke at the memorial service said Tuesday, there is still much healing left to do and many questions unanswered. Was Jonestown a cult, a religious commune or a legitimate experiment in racial harmony and social justice gone bad? Should Ryan have insisted on going to personally investigate Jonestown, taking journalists with him, after having been warned that Jonestown was an armed camp and Jones himself increasingly unstable?

Was Jones a sadistic egomaniac who cynically abused his followers? Or was he a decent man who fell victim to the drugs, power and paranoia that finally devoured him and the 913 other men, women and children who died in Jonestown? Why didn't more people resist when they were ordered to die?

The raw emotion that still surrounds these questions flared into the open on the eve of Tuesday's commemoration when one group of survivors unveiled a plaque with the names of those who died, including Jones. Lela Howard, whose aunt died in Jonestown and who arranged for the plaque to be made and displayed at San Francisco's African American Historical and Cultural Society (80 percent of those who died were black), said she included Jones's name because "he, too, was a victim." Many Jonestown survivors seem to agree.

But Norwood, who has raised $30,000 for a memorial to be located at the mass grave site in Oakland, said she and many other relatives and survivors are outraged. Their families, she said, have spent the past 30 years trying to erase the stigma and guilt of having been "deceived" by Jones's appeal to racial equality, free health care and social welfare.

"Jones was not a victim," she said, fire in her eyes, vowing never to succumb to pressure from Jones's family and some others to include his name on the graveside monument that was partially unveiled Tuesday and will be completed next year. "To me, that's like putting Hitler's name on a memorial to the Holocaust."
A Tragedy That Resonates

For millions of Americans older than 40, the graphic images of hundreds of bloated bodies, piled two and three deep, rotting in the hot Guyanese sun 30 years ago and the unprecedented death of a congressman on a jungle airstrip made Jonestown the kind of tragic, gruesome event that even today is instantly recognizable.

But for those members of the Peoples Temple who survived Jonestown's bitter end, as well as for hundreds of relatives of those who died that day, for Ryan's family and those of us who were wounded in the airstrip attack, Jonestown is an indelible part of our lives that we have spent 30 years trying to recover from, hide from, understand or explain.

Thirty years ago, Jackie Speier was Rep. Leo J. Ryan's legislative assistant.

Today, she holds a congressional seat that encompasses much of Ryan's former district. When I interviewed her last week, it was the first time we had spoken since we were both nearly killed on the airstrip.

I was shot in the hip and survived by playing dead. She was shot five times by the Jonestown gunmen and barely pulled through. At one point, she said, her doctors thought an arm and a leg would have to be amputated. Later, they told her she might not be able to have children. She later had two. Even now, she has two bullets lodged in her body.

Yet, for all the nightmares and physical trauma she has suffered, she said she does not hold the Jonestown survivors responsible for what happened 30 years ago. They were, for the most part, "broken" people, she said, "intimidated and fearful of being exiled" by their leader.

On a personal level, she said, her near-death in Guyana had been "freeing" and made her "a little bit fearless." It was a sentiment I could understand. After being wounded in Jonestown, I spent the next 20 years as a war correspondent in Central America, the Middle East and the Persian Gulf.

As a Democratic member of the California state legislature for 18 years and now as a member of Congress, she said she has been willing to take on controversial issues and special interests that other politicians hesitate to tackle. She also remains fiercely loyal to her mentor, Ryan. She freely admits she told him she thought the Jonestown trip was "premature" and was so concerned about the danger that she prepared new wills for both of them. She even insisted on putting a "null and void" clause in the contract for a condominium unit she was buying in Arlington if she didn't return from the trip alive. But she says Ryan was convinced he had a congressional "shield," that no one would dare kill a U.S. congressman. She went along despite her misgivings because she believed Ryan was right to go: People in Jonestown were being held against their will.

Today, Speier views Ryan as a hero who gave his life for his constituents and "shaped how I view public service. What I've learned from the experience is that when you see something that's wrong, you have to act on it."

But she knows that some Jonestown survivors blame Ryan for triggering the mass murder-suicide. Others say that Ryan's insistence on bringing journalists is evidence that he was more interested in publicity and a future run for the Senate than in saving lives.

Ryan's daughter, Patricia, says the publicity-seeking charge is a "cheap shot. He didn't need the publicity. He had just won reelection. He was tired, and he really didn't want to go. But he felt very obligated to his constituents," especially one good friend whose son had joined the Temple in San Francisco, then defected, only to die in a suspicious accident several months later.

There's no question in her mind, Pat Ryan says, that Jonestown was a cult -- not the progressive church or revolutionary movement Jones painted it as. The testimonies detailing manipulation, sexual and physical abuse of those who disagreed with Jones, and the threats against those who tried to leave are all evidence of that, she says.

Over the years, her anger toward the Temple survivors and their families has tempered. She has attended memorials and other meetings with former Temple members, though she remains a bit resentful that most of the attention has been directed toward them -- not the man who tried to save them.

With Speier's move to Congress in a special election in April, Pat Ryan says her father's sacrifice is finally beginning to be recognized. To mark the 30th anniversary of his death, Speier introduced legislation in Washington to rename the historic post office building in San Mateo, where Ryan had his office, in his honor. On Monday, Speier, Pat Ryan and other members of the Ryan family attended the naming ceremony.

Former representative Stephen J. Solarz (D-N.Y.), who served with Ryan on the old House International Relations Committee, and who declined Ryan's invitation to accompany him on the Jonestown trip, says the recognition is well deserved. "I think it was a tribute to Leo that he was willing to go," Solarz said recently. "Jonestown was a source of legitimate concern, and I'm sure he was going there to protect the interests of his constituents."
Casting a Long Shadow

Fielding McGehee III and his wife, Rebecca Moore, whose two sisters died in Jonestown, are Jonestown's unofficial archivist-historians. They publish a yearly newsletter and maintain a Web site that has vast quantities of information about the Peoples Temple before and after its catastrophic end.

McGehee says there were seven known survivors of Jonestown itself, 15 who left Jonestown with Ryan and survived the airport massacre, and approximately 50 more who were at the Peoples Temple headquarters in Georgetown, Guyana's capital, who did not commit suicide on Nov. 18, 1978, as they were instructed to do. Several hundred other active members of the Temple were in the United States.

There were also hundreds of former Temple members who had defected, before or after Jones moved himself and many of his most loyal followers to Guyana in 1977. A number of them had organized a group called the Concerned Relatives, which was instrumental in convincing Ryan that Jones was increasingly psychotic and erratic, and was threatening to kill everyone in Jonestown if the Relatives, the media, the CIA and Jones's other perceived enemies did not leave him alone.

Jones had even gone so far as to hire Mark Lane, the largely discredited Kennedy conspiracy theorist, to mount a legal and public relations counteroffensive, detailed in a memo found in Jonestown by the FBI after Ryan's assassination. The document, dated Sept. 28, 1978, obtained this week by The Post, sets out Lane's proposal for "the filing of a multi-million dollar action in the appropriate federal court against each of the individuals, organizations and agencies of government which have participated in the campaign against the People's Temple."

Ironically, Lane accompanied Ryan, Speier and the rest of us to Jonestown. By his own account, he managed to escape just in time, after Ryan had been killed and the carnage in Jonestown had begun. A few days after the killings, Lane asked me if I had eaten the cheese sandwiches served to us that day before we left for the airstrip where I was wounded and Ryan was murdered. When I said yes, I had eaten the sandwiches, Lane said he had not -- because he'd been told they were poisoned. Why hadn't he told Ryan and the rest of us, I asked. There was no response.

In the aftermath of the carnage on Nov. 18, 1978, there was tremendous fear among those who survived, especially among the defectors, that a hit squad of Jones loyalists would try to kill those they blamed for Jonestown's end. Debbie Layton, a top Jones lieutenant who escaped from Jonestown and wrote a detailed affidavit of conditions inside the commune that helped persuade Ryan to go Jonestown, vividly remembers the minute she heard he had been killed.

She was living in San Francisco with her boyfriend, another Temple defector. "We jumped in the car and went immediately to a friend of my sister's," she recalls. "We were terrified we would be next."

Fear, distrust, guilt and shame have marked the lives of virtually everyone connected to the Peoples Temple. Many of the survivors hid their identities or changed their names. Garrett Lambrev, who joined the Peoples Temple in 1966 after dropping out of a doctoral program at Stanford, defected 10 years later after hearing credible reports of Temple members being tortured. He says he believes some prominent defectors in San Francisco were followed by surviving Temple loyalists after the mass suicide-murder and recalls attending the first memorial service, in 1979, "with fear and trembling."

Many Jonestown survivors and their families believe that the lessons of Jonestown are to remember and guard against demagogues who use religion as a cover for fraud, deception and imposing their own sometimes dangerous social and political beliefs on their naive and unsuspecting followers.

Speier says Jones's rise to power and legitimacy in San Francisco was largely due to his clever deception of George Moscone, Harvey Milk, Willie Brown and other San Francisco political leaders, who courted Jones in the years before the massacre because he provided them with campaign workers and critical support.

"From my perspective," Speier says, "the Peoples Temple got out of hand because the political leadership in San Francisco was indebted to Jim Jones."

It was that theme that dominated Tuesday's memorial service at the mass grave in Oakland. In an emotional and highly charged address, the Rev. Amos Brown, bishop at San Francisco's Third Baptist Church and president of the San Francisco NAACP, warned the mourners to beware of religious leaders who claim to have all the answers and insinuate themselves into politics, as Jones did so effectively in San Francisco.

"Good religion elevates folk, it teaches people to think for themselves. Good religion isn't authoritarian. Good religion isn't bigoted," he said. "Open up your eyes, America. America isn't a theocracy, it's a democracy. . . . And that is the lesson we must learn from Jonestown."
Last edited by chiggerbit on Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby lupercal » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:07 pm

Speier says Jones's rise to power and legitimacy in San Francisco was largely due to his clever deception of George Moscone, Harvey Milk, Willie Brown and other San Francisco political leaders, who courted Jones in the years before the massacre because he provided them with campaign workers and critical support.

"From my perspective," Speier says, "the Peoples Temple got out of hand because the political leadership in San Francisco was indebted to Jim Jones."


And Moscone and Milk were coincidentally assassinated the same week?! :shock:
User avatar
lupercal
 
Posts: 1439
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:06 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chiggerbit » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:28 pm

Not that I'm going to take a Russian's spy's word for anything. But it certainly raises the question of whether Lane had a cozy relationship with the Soviets prior to Jonestown. BTW, who ended up with Jonestown's bank account?

http://www.jfk-online.com/mitrokhin.html


"......The KGB correctly identified the New York lawyer Mark Lane as the most talented of the first wave of conspiracy theorists researching the JFK assassination. According to one report made on him, probably by the New York residency: Mark Lane is well known as a person with close ties to Democratic Party circles in the US. He holds liberal views on a number of current American political problems and has undertaken to conduct his own private investigation of the circumstances surrounding the murder of J. Kennedy."

Joesten praised Lane as "brilliant and courageous" and dedicated his own book to him: "Neither the 'Police state tactics' of the FBI -- to use [Lane's] own words -- nor the conspiracy of silence of the press magnates, could sway him from doggedly pursuing the truth." Together with student assistants and other volunteers, Lane founded the Citizens' Committee of Inquiry in a small office on lower Fifth Avenue and rented a small theater at which, each evening for several months, he gave what became known as "The Speech," updating the development of his conspiracy theory. "This alternative method of dissent was required," writes Lane, "because not a single network radio or television program permitted the broadcast of a word of divergence from the official view." Though it dared not take the risk of contacting Lane directly, the New York residency sent him 1,500 dollars to help finance his research through the intermediary of a close friend whom Lane's KGB file identifies only as a trusted contact. While Lane was not told the source of the money, the residency suspected that he might have guessed where it came from; it was also concerned that the secret subsidy might be discovered by the FBI.

The same intermediary provided 500 dollars to pay for a trip by Lane to Europe in 1964. While there, Lane asked to visit Moscow in order to discuss some of the material he had found. The Centre regretfully concluded that inviting him to Russia would reveal its hand in too blatant a way and his proposed trip was "tactfully postponed." Trusted contacts were, however, selected from among Soviet journalists to encourage him in his research. Among them was the KGB agent Genrikh Borovik, who later maintained regular contact with Lane. Lane's Rush to Judgment, published in 1966, alleged complicity at the highest levels of government in the Kennedy assassination. It was top of that year's hardback bestseller best and went on to become the best-selling paperback of 1967, as well as enjoying what Lane modestly describes as enormous success around the world" and causing "a dramatic change in public perception" of the assassination.


During the late 1960s and early 1970s, Lane's success was less enormous. The most popular books on the assassination were now those that exposed some of the excesses of the conspiracy theorists." CPUSA leaders who visited Moscow in 1971, though describing Rush to Judgment as "advantageous to the Communists," claimed that Lane's main motive was his own self-aggrandizement. In the mid-1970s, however, the dramatic revelations of real conspiracy in the Nixon White House and of CIA assassination plots against several foreign statesmen gave the conspiracy theorists a new lease on life." The KGB, predictably, was anxious to lose no opportunity to promote active measures which supported the increasingly popular theory that the CIA was behind Kennedy's assassination. Its chief target was the former CIA officer turned Watergate conspirator E. Howard Hunt (sometimes confused with the Texan oil millionaire H. L. Hunt), who had been wrongly accused of being in Dallas on the day of the assassination......



".......By the late 1970s the KGB could fairly claim that far more Americans believed some version of its own conspiracy theory of the Kennedy assassination, involving a right-wing plot and the US intelligence community, than still accepted the main findings of the Warren Commission. Soviet active measures, however, had done less to influence American opinion than the Centre believed. By their initial cover-ups the CIA and the FBI had unwittingly probably done more than the KGB to encourage the sometimes obsessional conspiracy theorists who swarmed around the complex and confusing evidence on the assassination....."
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chiggerbit » Thu Jul 02, 2009 2:42 pm

Last edited by chiggerbit on Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chiggerbit » Thu Jul 02, 2009 3:30 pm

Sad:

(Here, let me change the link from the cached version to the original so you can see the photos that go with this sad story.)

http://www.laweekly.com/2008-10-23/news ... uicide/all


".....As the shaken politician and his entourage boarded their aircraft at the Port Kaituma airstrip, they were attacked by a group of armed temple members. Representative Ryan was shot dead. When Jones heard the news, he staged the final White Night. This time, there was cyanide in the fruit punch, brought out in vats and distributed by the nursing staff. Three accounts by eyewitnesses placed Phyllis Chaikin among the group that, under the supervision of Dr. Schacht, dispensed the lethal drink.

Attorney Charles Garry was in Jonestown on the last night. He had asked to see Gene but was refused. After the carnage began, Jones advised Garry to run for his life. He managed to escape into the jungle with Mark Lane, another lawyer on Jones’ payroll. Terrified, Garry and Lane tore through the undergrowth. Later, exhausted, they sat beneath a tree and tried to make sense of what they had just been through. In an interview with Robert Scheer in the Los Angeles Times on November 26, 1978, eight days after the catastrophe, Garry recalled, “I kept wanting to see Gene Chaikin. They kept telling me he was sick. And Mark kept telling me not to ask them anymore. He said, ‘They’re not going to let you, don’t ask anymore.’ And when we were in the jungle, I said, ‘Why did you keep telling me not to ask?’ Then he told me the whole story. He said, ‘Gene Chaikin is drugged, if he’s still alive.’ If I had known all of this, I would not have been a party to going [to Jonestown], I would not have asked anybody to go down there, and I would have gotten the hell off the case.”

In his Jonestown book The Strongest Poison, Mark Lane wrote that Gene’s brother Ray had convinced the U.S. consular official Richard Dwyer to visit Jonestown in order to ascertain the state of Gene’s health and to question him about his recent experiences there. This interview, which even Jim Jones was powerless to prevent, took place on the night before the mass murder/suicides, in the Extended Care Unit of the medical building, where Dwyer reported Gene had been confined. Lane believes Gene was murdered there shortly afterward while in a tranquilized and helpless state......"
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chiggerbit » Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:22 pm

Holy cow, I had forgotten pretty much all of the history mentioned here. And it's all so complicated. Still trying to figure out what this site is about:

http://www.ajweberman.com/nodules2/nodulec25.htm

edit: found the contents page, but still can't find out what the site is:

http://www.ajweberman.com/nodules2/nodulec30.htm

edit again: I think it must be this site

http://www.ajweberman.com/

with index here:

http://ajweberman.com/coupt5.htm

Anyway, Mark Lane was mentioned in the first link I gave above.
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby American Dream » Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:39 pm

I can't say much of anything with regards to Mark Lanes alleged ties to the Soviets, but as far as Jonestown goes, I don't believe it for a second. More likely Jonestown worked to set up misleading linkages to Communism, perhaps in part to silence Leftists in "the West" who might otherwise squawk about the conspiracy behind Jonestown happenings. A similar gambit worked well with regards to Oswald and his alleged ties to the Soviets.

As to A.J. Weberman, he is a funny bird. While he has done interesting conspiracy investigations, it's a little weird that he's now involved with the ultra-Zionist militants of the Jewish Defense Organization...
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chiggerbit » Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:56 pm

Never heard of him.
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chiggerbit » Thu Jul 02, 2009 4:58 pm

AD, I know that I've gotten a bit anal about Mark Lane. I've never dug into his stuff before, so I've been following my nose. If you think this is all too off-topic, let me know and I'll sart a new thread.
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby American Dream » Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:02 pm

A.J. Weberman is the host of the site you linked to, and the author of the book Coup D'etat in America, on the JFK assassination. He is also an old time Yippie from New York, and he also became identified with "garbology"- the method of finding out about people by looking in their garbage (did it to Dylan and Lennon and it wasn't illegal).

I find him a curious figure, though I do think his JFK investigations contain a lot of good material...


ON EDIT: People wander a lot here, and I'm not worrying about the twists and turns the conversation is taking. But thanks for asking.
Last edited by American Dream on Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chiggerbit » Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:07 pm

and he also became identified with "garbology"- the method of finding out about people by looking in their garbage (did it to Dylan and Lennon and it wasn't illegal).


Oh, THAT guy. Ok.

Thanks for the info. And for not making me start over again.
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby streeb » Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:50 pm

Was it Coup D'Etat in America that first created interest in the three tramps, or at least the first time that two of them were alleged to be E Howard Hunt and Frank Sturgis? It seems to me there are seasonal Kennedy disinfo campaigns built around Hunt -- the three tramps nonsense, Marita Lorenz's testimony used by Lane at the Liberty Lobby trial, which turned out to be bogus (right?), and the "deathbed confession" in Rolling Stone. In all three cases, it's a convenient CIA or MIC smoking gun, if that's what you're looking for.
User avatar
streeb
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 9:19 pm
Location: Zona, BC
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby American Dream » Thu Jul 02, 2009 5:55 pm

ON EDIT: I think it is true that Weberman was one of the first to charge that Sturgis and Hunt were tramps (he used photos to make the case) and that Marita Lorenz corroborated these charges.

streeb, sounds like you are hot on the trail of something important.

Please say more...
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby compared2what? » Thu Jul 02, 2009 6:40 pm

chig, wrt to the Soviet stuff, and to research resources in general:

Strictly per my experience, and thus solely in my opinion, in that time period*, the Soviet stuff is certainly always worth noting. And once in a way, it might be decisively indicative of something more comprehensive than the presences of shenanigans in general. It depends on the context. But most of the time, there's just enough ambiguity about either the source of the info or the sovietness of the Soviet that you don't really end up learning that much from it, beyond that it appears highly possible that someone was practicing deep politics, as usual. Which is highly possible going in, a priori, for something that has as much potential as (to name one among many, more specific possibilities**) an arms/drugs/human trafficking hub as Jonestown had.

Also, FWIW, Leo Ryan has always seemed like a good guy to me. He was, in part, in show business, as all congressman are, after all. So a little or even a lot of showboating isn't really a reflection on his character, per se, imo. Showboating is as showboating does.

Speaking of which:

Hugh, let's be friends. We're both stronger and better off that way, despite our disagreements and -- more to the point -- so is the community as a whole. No response is required, so please don't feel obligated to make any. But please also know that I'm going to at least try to proceed in the spirit of unilateral friendliness, either way.

Yours in solidarity,

c2w

* During the Kennedy/Johnson part of the Cold War, Guyana was much fucked around with by Commie-fearing U.S./British interests. So it did have that legacy. But officially, it had been pretty squarely in the non-Commie column since 1968. Unofficially, especially in the post-Soviet era, who ever knows who the fuck is ultimately on top? (Although please see "***".) Plus, fwiw, and also officially, while Scientology certainly landed on the former Soviet states like (as we used to say back when the highly visible NYC homeless were still mostly white drunks staggering around the Bowery) a bum on a baloney sandwich, prior to that, there's just too much Hubbard-generated bullshit to say what the fuck their geopolitical agenda was, or even if they had one. Beyond taking over the world. Needless to say, once they got there, they almost immediately became enmired in numerous hostilities, controversies, and legal battles with a whole grip of official state powers that weren't a whole lot less mucked up than they were. Just like they always do. So again: Who the fuck knows?

*** Who's ultimately on top is not, imo, the most fruitful question to ask on a preliminary basis anyway. It's very difficult to answer even when all the research results are in. There's a lot to be said for looking at the shenanigans that are hiding in plain sight, looking as intriguing as an old pile of logs. In Guyana's case, primarily because they actually are an old pile of logs. It's not a very sexy research area, but the "location, location, location" global-trade implications that might attach to any particular instance of spooky-looking shit aren't necessarily confined to inherently unascertainable issues of gun-, drug- and sex-slave-trafficking potential. There are any number of legitimately globally traded commodities that are good indicators of otherwise semi-submerged or front-company-concealed alliances and/or obligations when they're present. Timber being a classical example. It's a limited resource, and Guyana's got it. And....the forestry industry is an excellent cover for druggier agriculture and processing enterprises, obvs. However, it's also profitable enough in itself for monopolizing it to be desirable to all the usual-suspect covetous powers on an above-board basis. So, you know. It's easy to miss the forests for the Soviets. But luckily, it's just as easy to see the forests once you remember to look for them.

And I note that in 1979, there was a major policy shift wrt how logging rights were assigned in Guyana, and by whom. And to whom, probably, though I didn't look at it that closely. Per this shoddily designed little website, there was a major hook-up with (at least technically) Malaysian and South Korean interests in the early '90s (ie -- roughly in the Clinton, NAFTA-ish era), followed by some nice spooky-sounding grants from British providers of aid to impoverished countries. And in 2000, they got a spanking new herbarium! With all kinds of fancy, sparkly features! Ostensibly. I mean, they probably did. But that might just be press-release code for "some new Quonset huts for the captive slave labor we lured here from Thailand, India, or [African Country To Be Named Later].

But whatever the case, that site's just a gold mine (which Guyana also has in literal reality, btw) for research purposes. If you're not looking for a nice beginning-middle-end story that fits well with the canon to which you already subscribe, and you can tolerate the monotony of repeatedly running the names of the various persons, corporations, NGOs, and so forth that are very helpfully actually identified by name on that site through whatever various cross-checks and databases occur to you in your idler moments, before too long you're pretty much certain to gain enough independent familiarity with the landscape to recognize a suspicious anomaly when you see one. And thus also to become inocculated against uncheckable tales of covert activity that run counter to whatever overt realities of little narrative interest but inherently high unfalsifiability are known to you. Or, in a word: Truths. And nothing is more likely quickly to reveal a lie than its incompatibility with known truths.

You also might get lucky enough to uncover some part of the secret that the secret team doesn't want you to know. Which is, fundamentally, that they're not really all that secret, unless you also require them to have exceptionally high human-drama values.

But even if you don't....Well. You know: If there's one damn thing you can always rely on, as they say.

Dull but true.
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)
PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 162 guests