Elvis wrote:8bitagent wrote:Fortean/UFO/Xfile C2C junkies hate truthers/coverup researchers/anti NWO/para political/deep state researcher types and vice versa
Hm, I hadn't thought that, but now that you mention I can see that it happens. The blinders of over-specialization?
I was always into such things, since I was a little kid when my grandmother loaned me her Frank Edwards books ("Flying Saucers Are Real" etc.)
Mainly, I just love mysteries (and solving them to the extent possible), and loathe injustice.
We need renaissance women and men. Humans who don't think in categories and are at least passingly familiar with several areas of science, and willing to entertain possibilities in realm of the wildest dreams. Jacks of all trades, masters in passion to know.
Thomson also said that the then-new x-ray machine was a "hoax"...that is, until his rather smug view was changed by the evidence.
Most of us, me included, are smug bastards from early childhood. Not from birth, certainly not.
I hate to break this to you, but a bunch of prevaricators, fabulists, fabricators, mythomaniacs, charlatans and hoaxers have thoroughly infiltrated "para"-everything discussions.
And what is smug about disbelieving something outrageous until evidence is presented? Nothing. Do you remember the Steorn debacle? Long on vague generalities ("we've got this thing, it does stuff"), short on actual anything but confidence games? Most of what passes as parapolitics or even paranormal in one way or another involves and implicates real historical individuals in acts of treason or mass dissimulation. Regardless, it suggests that someone somewhere is culpable of something--and doing so is levying a charge. But to do so without evidence? That's a recipe for witch-hunting.
Not only that, but most of the basic narratives you find in para-fields are fraught with all sorts of questionable and thinly-veiled devices.
So pardon my increasing skepticism, especially when it comes to the "hidden technology" myth.
Indeed.