Ted and the CIA, Part 1 by David Kaczynski

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Ted and the CIA, Part 1 by David Kaczynski

Postby Iamwhomiam » Tue Dec 28, 2010 9:32 pm

Yes, it was germane, and I wrongfully exaggerated in saying that none of it was now about Ted but rather, Jeremy . Yes; keep the minnows. I do appreciate your explaining to the Hacktavist the animosity he's been confronted by.

Suspicious with reason, I'm sure, but the hostility! For instance, after c2w commented doubting the visiting time allotted, I [url]posted[/url] the prison visitors rules to being limited to 7 hours to which s/he replied,

"But wanna know something really, really shocking before I do? Okay. But brace yourself.

Pssst. Prisons don't always adhere to the written rules for visitors that they make available to the public. In fact, in one way or another, wrt serious prisons that's not just "don't always." It's more like "never do." And if there's one thing on earth they positively have an absolute aversion to, it's letting journalists hang around lengthily noticing shit.

I mean, for crying out loud, look at those guidelines for attire. Ever stop to think about how handy those might be for a guard who'd been told to be in the mood to make a judgment call about the unacceptability of some visitor's clothing in order to punish the inmate? Or the visitor? Or to ensure that some injury wasn't seen? Or just on a fucking whim?

It's a prison. Nobody has any rights there except the people who run it. That's what prison is."
S/he ended with "Like you care, I know."

All unnecessary and unwarranted. I am not a naive child and did not appreciate their demeaning remark. I've never had any problem or any controversy with c2w and don't think I've ever disagreed with their views. I offered no criticism at all, but simply shared the prison info without further comment. It all turned out to be moot, after all. Except of course for c2w's error about underwire underwear being mandatory, which I brought to their attention. I still don't understand what prompted their last remark and remain baffled by it.

But still, even after those insulting remarks from ctw I let it go and responded with curiosity and kindness, especially because of my high regard for her/him:

"I hadn't been aware that you had bailed on RI and were back only temporarily. Seems I missed the precipitating event.

I've always appreciated your insight and with your command of language how you've expressed yourself. In my few years here I've never criticized you and never felt a need to before... now.

It's just my feeling that you have been a bit unreasonable in your treatment of the Hacktavist in this thread. You may never read this, but I needed to air my feelings. That's it."


So c2w?s gone? Leaves me puzzled.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Ted and the CIA, Part 1 by David Kaczynski

Postby compared2what? » Tue Dec 28, 2010 10:20 pm

stefano:

There abso-fucking-lutely is a proper name on the opening page of that site, though I don't know that it belongs to jeremypsyops, and never said that I did. It does belong to someone who posts the same backstory wrt dates and so on that jeremypsyops does, however. And to someone who's posted to CCHR and is one of the founding members of, in effect if not in intent, a CCHR knock-off.

Which is what I said, minus the explicit qualification wrt effect and intent. FWIW, I don't pretend that's all that's there. But it is objectively there.

And yes. Plainly, it is a very big deal to me IRL. What I meant was that I didn't see anything being evinced here that struck me as any big deal, really, as long as people were nice and gentle to each other. And that's still what I mean. Okay?

elfismiles:

Love you, dude. Flesh it out yourself, I know you can do it.

Iamwhomiam:

(1) Love you too.

(2) Am departing, of my own volition and for my own reasons.

(3) Will still love you after that, whether you grant me the upcoming request or not, because it's really not all that important to me and, for all I know, it may be to you. But fwiw...

Iamwhomiam wrote:While many are interested in this new controversy brought here by c2w?, none of this has been directed towards relating to Kaczynski, but rather to "Jeremy".


...I've acted honorably, in good faith, and with the maximum rather than the minimum amount of consideration for the welfare and wishes of yourself and others as well as I could, in all integrity, see damn any way to do, for the whole, entire damn length of this thread.

So if you're rubber and I'm glue, that should be what bounces off you and sticks to me. Not implicit accusations of wrong-doing or trouble-making. Or tarring. Or feathering. Or various iterations, counter-iterations, and reiterations of [x-is-not-the-problem-c2w?-is-the-problem] innuendo-laden backing and forthing. I don't deserve it. I'm not worth it. And I therefore hope that you take the high road, if it pleases you to do so, my friend. Nothing's blocking it. I believe that it's where you want to go. But even if it's not, I don't think you'll regret it. And I personally will greatly appreciate it. Be indebted to you for it, in fact.

And that only goes one way, just to be clear. You owe me nothing, afaic. Other than to do as you will, because I wouldn't have it otherwise. But, you know. In the event that you do feel like doing me a favor, I'd be tickled pink if you kept your eyes open for any unfortuitous turns of phrase that might inadvertently and unhappily be slipping in to cuddle up to my username while you were preoccupied with something else.

I mean, nobody's perfect. So it ain't no big thing. And for chrissake, I would not say that if I meant the reverse. How long will it fucking take for any- and./or everyone to figure that one the fuck out? *Sigh*. I come across as much more cutting than I ever intended to be sometimes, I know. But I only know that theoretically on my own. In practice, I only know it retroactively when I see its reflection in someone else's response. Because nobody's perfect. Which, IIRC, was verily the point I seek to make! Whee!

But I apologize to anyone who's been hurt by that with all my heart, even still.

ON EDIT:

Iamwhomiam wrote:S/he ended with "Like you care, I know."


She.

And honey: That wasn't intended to be read as if addressed to you. It was intended as a general acknowledgment of how fucking tediously attached to detailing stuff at monotonous length I am. My apologies.

Also, wrt that misreading of the foundation-garment rules at Florence, I not only regret the error, but am grateful to you for correcting it, as I was unnecessarily baffling myself by committing it. Because I actually have been in a maximum-security prison in a professional capacity, etc. And even with that reinforced glass, they just don't play that. Or even anything close to it.

So I was basically just putting off the contemplation of why they'd do something as confounding as give up a perfectly good humiliating, intrusive, and plausibly justifiable control mechanism for no reason at all until another day.

Which I will now hasten to cross off my to-do list.

HERE ENDETH THE EDIT.

Peace, love and soul to each and to every. And yada, yada, yada.

c2w
“If someone comes out of a liquor store with a weapon and 50 dollars in cash I don’t care if a Drone kills him or a policeman kills him.” -- Rand Paul
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Ted and the CIA, Part 1 by David Kaczynski

Postby The Hacktivist » Wed Dec 29, 2010 12:09 am

I have decided myself that this place is not for me. Jeff could you please remove me and all traces of me from this forum, if that isnt possible on your end let me know, I am just not comfortable here any longer.

Thanks.
The Hacktivist
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 9:53 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Ted and the CIA, Part 1 by David Kaczynski

Postby Jeff » Wed Dec 29, 2010 12:17 am

The Hacktivist wrote:I have decided myself that this place is not for me. Jeff could you please remove me and all traces of me from this forum, if that isnt possible on your end let me know, I am just not comfortable here any longer.

Thanks.


It's against my policy to expunge posts in such a manner, but I will close your account.
User avatar
Jeff
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11134
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2000 8:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Ted and the CIA, Part 1 by David Kaczynski

Postby barracuda » Wed Dec 29, 2010 1:12 am

Huh. So a hardcore hacker who carried on a lengthy coorespondance with one of the world's most notorious terrorists just got scared off by a nice lady from our forum.

I guess 4chan ain't makin' 'em like they used to.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Ted and the CIA, Part 1 by David Kaczynski

Postby Iamwhomiam » Wed Dec 29, 2010 3:47 am

May I please now have this thread locked. I believe it has run its course. Someone else could certainly revive it in a new thread.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

hot pants

Postby IanEye » Wed Dec 29, 2010 9:21 am

compared2what? wrote:...I've acted honorably, in good faith, and with the maximum rather than the minimum amount of consideration for the welfare and wishes of yourself and others as well as I could, in all integrity, see damn any way to do, for the whole, entire damn length of this thread.


word.


_-_

Image

I'm out here to bomb, period. That's what I started for.
I didn't start writing to go to Paris, I didn't start writing to do canvases.
I started writing to bomb - destroy all lines.


-_-
User avatar
IanEye
 
Posts: 4865
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 10:33 pm
Blog: View Blog (29)

Re: Ted and the CIA, Part 1 by David Kaczynski

Postby nathan28 » Wed Dec 29, 2010 11:34 am

:lock:

I've really wanted to use that one for a while now
„MAN MUSS BEFUERCHTEN, DASS DAS GANZE IN GOTTES HAND IST"

THE JEERLEADER
User avatar
nathan28
 
Posts: 2957
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Ted and the CIA, Part 1 by David Kaczynski

Postby barracuda » Wed Dec 29, 2010 12:08 pm

Iamwhomiam wrote:May I please now have this thread locked.


Your wish is my command.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 171 guests