Nuclear Meltdown Watch

[eyeno]

John Hutchinson trying to set up his own Haarp system.

Hutchison Gives Instructions for Earth Radiation Shield from Japanese Fallout

http://pesn.com/2011/03/19/9501792_Hutc ... on_Shield/


Preface by Sterling D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News

I received the following email from John Hutchison and Nancy Lazaryan.

Apparently they think that a network Ham Radio, CB radio and Tesla Coil operators could form a protective barrier, not just in the U.S., but worldwide, even in Japan, from the radiation that is spewing from the damaged reactors.

The email describes a method that is relatively simple. This is far outside my area of expertise, but Hutchison does have a track record of being able to accomplish some very unusual effects via frequencies. We have published his documentation about clearing regions of Gulf waters nearly back to a pristine state using radio and audio frequencies.
----- Original Message -----
From: Nancy Lazaryan
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 11:44 AM
Subject: SOLUTION to Japan Nuclear Radiation.---Ham --CB radio--Tesla Coils--CREATE A SHIELD for the Earth NOW!!!!!

To all everyone with a Ham Radio, CB radio or Tesla Coil...
and if you don't have one of these, get a piece of REBAR and put it in your yard...
this pass the email to everyone you know!!!!

MEDIA PEOPLE: Please post, announce, distribute.

John Hutchison has been in the Gulf of Mexico using certain audio and radio frequencies to RESET the polluted waters.
THE SAME SCIENCE can be used to try to PROTECT the Earth from the radiation being released in Japan.

Hutchison is transmitting RIGHT NOW.
People need to pick up the signal and "bounce" it to attempt to create a SHIELD.

Here are John Hutchison's instructions:

HAM RADIO OPERATORS
TUNE INTO the
ULF bands at 16 kilohertz
VLF bands at 19 kilohertz to 400 kilohertz and then into the
HF bands at 4 megahertz starting at 2 mhz to 18 mhz then at up to 27 mhz
there will be lots of side carriers
You should here something SIMILAR to this (this is not the exact audio, but close)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-ubCyxDRXo

The RF effects are also in the X band region
the regions of the solar flux index and
hydrogen bands
these are 21 to 24 centimeters
broad banded

CAPTURE THIS and use AM and USB and lower SB to
RETRANSMIT and set up a RELAY

The frequencies can also be received by
RF MODULATED LASERS and TESLA COILS
Tesla coils will do a lot on there own, plug them in and they will receive and transmit

and if any folks have IMPULSE GENERATORS or RF GENERATORS
feed the signal into them and fire them off.

Ham Radio Operators
use phase shifting and other devices to get the frequencies out.

CB Radio Operators
If you can pick up the signal from John Hutchison, rebroadcast it. Do a CB SKIP.

We are working with sky waves, ground waves and interactions with a larger prime mover like the ionosphere, solar and geomagnetic fields and propagation. THIS IS SAFE!!!

EVERYONE ELSE
We used REBAR as antennas to capture the RF frequencies.
This worked in cleaning the ground around the rebar.
GET rebar and put in the ground.

Along with this use your mind for healing the earth and helping Japan.
This is called psychotronics.
All the above information and psychotronics are accepted sciences in the military industrial complex as well as noetic science teams.

Please participate.
Please help save the Earth.

John Hutchison and Nancy Lazaryan


# # #
Q&A
Rebar

Question: Using rebar to capture RF frequencies? How long a piece and how much is driven into the ground? What diameter rebar could be used? How many rebars would one use? Would one use 4, one for each direction?

Answer: March 19, 2011 2:32 PM MST
roughly 6 feet long
about a foot into the ground
1/4" to 1/2" diameter...or whatever is available
one is okay, 4 is better
Related PESN Coverage

In reverse chronological sequence:

[freemason9]

Aluminum foil works well, too, shaped into a cone and worn atop the head.

[eyeno]

___________________
(bad old embed code originally meant for old windows media player embeds of some sort. now removed from main posting screen.)
here's what was enclosed in old wonky embed tags:
http://vimeo.com/22706805
___________________



___________________
(bad old embed code originally meant for old windows media player embeds of some sort. now removed from main posting screen.)
here's what was enclosed in old wonky embed tags:
<embed src="http://blip.tv/play/AfahcwI" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="303" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed>
___________________



___________________
(bad old embed code originally meant for old windows media player embeds of some sort. now removed from main posting screen.)
here's what was enclosed in old wonky embed tags:
<embed src="http://blip.tv/play/AfaiNwI" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="303" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed>
___________________


http://www.fairewinds.com/content/epide ... s-gunderse

http://www.fairewinds.com/content/seven ... th-effects

http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2011/0 ... out-19174/

[eyeno]

Always thought there might be a smoking gun in the tobacco/lung cancer connection and this may be it.

Radioactive Polonium in Tobacco

For over 40 years, researchers and tobacco corporations have known that cigarettes contain radionuclides(1). The contamination is sourced in naturally occurring radioactive radon gas(2) which is absorbed and trapped in apatite rock(3). Apatite, or phosphate rock, is mined for the purpose of formulating the phosphate portion of most chemical fertilizers(4). Polonium releases ionizing alpha radiation which is 20 times more harmful than either beta or gamma radiation when exposed to internal organs(5).

Lung cancer rates increased significantly during most of the 1900's(6). It's no coincidence that between 1938 and 1960, the level of polonium 210 in American tobacco tripled commensurate with the increased use of chemical fertilizers and Persistant Organic Pollutant (POP) accumulation(7).

In 1982, tobacco researchers DiFranza and Winters concluded that smoking a pack and a half of cigarettes per day exposed a person to the same radiation as 300 chest x-rays per year(8). Due to improvements in X-ray technology and increasing levels of radionuclides in tobacco, the Institute of Medicine now estimates that a heavy smoker is exposed to the equivalent radiation as up to 2,000 chest X-rays every year(9). The National Institutes of Health state that tobacco is by far the largest source of radiation for the American public(10). Polonium is also present in chewing tobacco, benignly referred to as smokeless tobacco, and may contribute to the development of oral cancers(11).

Recently released tobacco corporation internal memos and reports indicate that they were well aware of radiation contamination as early as 1964(12), and discussed methods to remove polonium from tobacco in 1975(13). In 1977, Phillip Morris confirmed that superphosphate fertilizer was a source of polonium(14).

Indoor radon accumulation is a serious health risk that is responsible for approximately 21,000 American lung cancer fatalities annually(15). Smoking tobacco greatly magnifies the radon risk(16). The needless additional radiation delivered via fertilizer can be reduced through the use of alternative phosphate processing techniques(17) or organic fertilizers(18).
http://www.webspawner.com/users/radioactivethreat/

FOOTNOTES:

[StarmanSkye]

"Radioactive Polonium in Tobacco"

NOW 'they' tell me -- or wasn't I listening? I'd only recently learned of the polonium contaminants in phosphate fertilizer -- but that's in almost everything commercially grown unless its grown organically.

Its another aspect of corporate culture based on the cancer model of parasitical expediency.

[norton ash]

Smokers have always been fucked, simply because of the number of times you carry the toxins from your fingers to your mouth. Paint, polish, cleansers, oil, metals, mold, microbes, bacteria, you name it.

Aaahh. Exhaling.

[lupercal]

Its another aspect of corporate culture based on the cancer model of parasitical expediency.

Or on the cancer model of maximizing early deaths, infant brain defects and sterility? What would be the benefits? Let's see, they can steal more pension and social security funds if there are fewer oldsters around to collect, plus there's that Malthusian obsession that the psychopathic rich never fail to subscribe to, so if they can't get the full-on nuke war they've been itching for since the 1950s, what's not to like about depleted uranium and major nuclear power catastrophes?

[eyeno]

EPA Radnet Data Shows Radioactive Fukushima Plutonium And Strontium In U.S. Since March 18th

April 22, 2011


http://theintelhub.com/2011/04/22/radio ... arch-18th/

[Feilan]

[freemason9]

Its another aspect of corporate culture based on the cancer model of parasitical expediency.

Or on the cancer model of maximizing early deaths, infant brain defects and sterility? What would be the benefits? Let's see, they can steal more pension and social security funds if there are fewer oldsters around to collect, plus there's that Malthusian obsession that the psychopathic rich never fail to subscribe to, so if they can't get the full-on nuke war they've been itching for since the 1950s, what's not to like about depleted uranium and major nuclear power catastrophes?

I think the whole thing became simply a matter of establishing an addiction and then feeding it at a profit. Something about cigarettes changed over the past few decades. At one time, folks were smoking Lucky Strikes and Camel regulars and Winstons and Pall Malls and Chesterfields and any of a hundred different brands--it seemed that everyone eventually migrated, though, toward a specific Marlboro addiction. This really implicates Phillip Morris quite strongly. In any event, I'm certain it has always been about profit.

[Nordic]

I'm not saying this is "proof" but it sure is difficult to believe that there's an intact reactor vessel inside this rubble.

http://lucaswhitefieldhixson.com/hi-res ... d-unit-3-0

Hi-res photographic proof reactor core exploded at unit 3

I was struck by the location of the spent fuel pool on the third floor. (The spent fuel pool in the diagram is in the upper right corner of the building to the right of the top of the reactor, below the yellow beam, which is below the large orange girders.Part of the pool is cut away in the diagram, it appears to extend most of the way across about half of the building on the third floor) I went back to the site with the aerial photos and confirmed that the third floor was pretty much entirely obliterated in the explosion. The spent fuel pool is gone... see for yourself.

Today I had another look at the diagram, and noticed something else quite significant that I had missed before. I realized that the top of the primary containment vessel was flush with the floor level of the 4th floor, and that the top of the reactor itself was in the space between the 3rd and 4th floors, partially surrounded by the spent fuel pool.
Look at those photos again, particularly the 5th shot. At the top of the photo you see the skeletal remnants of the wall of the 3rd and 4th floors. It is easy to see the floor level of the third floor - there are two massive steam pipes running behind and below the building...the lower edge of the lower pipe is almost perfectly aligned with the floor level of the 3rd floor. Follow the floor line of the third floor down down from that back wall along the right side of the building, then across the front side of the building near the bottom of the photo. That shows you the floor level of the 3rd floor very clearly, right? There is nothing but air remaining above that level, except for a bit of roof debris which you can see through. The top of the primary containment vessel, as well as the top of the reactor itself, is simply GONE.

Even to a layperson, it is obvious that this means that the huge hydrogen explosion at unit 3 must have occurred in the reactor itself, and that the entire top of the reactor containment vessel was obliterated, ejecting the contents of the core - as well as the spent fuel pool- into the atmosphere.

This means, obviously, that significant quantities of plutonium were released, and that the release of radiation from unit 3 alone must be many times higher than has been admitted for the entire complex - Chernobyl pales in comparison.

It is apparent that Tepco, the NRC, and the Japanese and American government officials, among others, are participating in a coverup of the extent and severity of this disaster. This almost certainly applies to the blandly misleading assurances about the harmlessness of the fallout on US soil. The whistle must be blown, loud and clear.

link to the higher-res photos, which are pretty cringe-inducing:

http://cryptome.org/eyeball/daiichi-npp ... photos.htm

Yikes.

[seemslikeadream]

On the Danger of a Killer Earthquake in the Japanese Archipelago
The Nuclear Disaster That Could Destroy Japan ... and the World

By HIROSE TAKASHI

Translated by Doug Lummis

The nuclear power plants in Japan are ageing rapidly; like cyborgs, they are barely kept in operation by a continuous replacement of parts. And now that Japan has entered a period of earthquake activity and a major accident could happen at any time, the people live in constant state of anxiety.

Seismologists and geologists agree that, after some fifty years of seismic inactivity, with the 1995 Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake (Southern Hyogo Prefecture Earthquake), the country has entered a period of seismic activity. In 2004, the Chuetsu Earthquake hit Niigata Prefecture, doing damage to the village of Yamakoshi. Three years later, in 2007, the Chuetsu Offshore Earthquake severely damaged the nuclear reactors at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa. In 2008, there was an earthquake in Iwate and Miyagi Prefectures, causing a whole mountain to disappear completely. Then in 2009 the Hamaoka nuclear plant was put in a state of emergency by the Suruga Bay Earthquake. And now, in 2011, we have the 3/11 earthquake offshore from the northeast coast. But the period of seismic activity is expected to continue for decades. From the perspective of seismology, a space of 10 or 15 years is but a moment in time.

Because the Pacific Plate, the largest of the plates that envelop the earth, is in motion, I had predicted that there would be major earthquakes all over the world.

And as I had feared, after the Suruga Bay Earthquake of August 2009 came as a triple shock, it was followed in September and October by earthquakes off Samoa, Sumatra, and Vanuatu, of magnitudes between 7.6 and 8.2. That means three to eleven times the force of the Southern Hyogo Prefecture Earthquake.



All of these quakes occurred around the Pacific Plate as the center, and each was located at the boundary of either that plate or a plate under its influence. Then in the following year, 2010, in January there came the Haiti Earthquake, at the boundary of the Caribbean Plate, pushed by the Pacific and Coco Plates, then in February the huge 8.8 magnitude earthquake offshore from Chile. I was praying that this world scale series of earthquakes would come to an end, but the movement of the Pacific Plate shows no sign of stopping, and led in 2011 to the 3/11 Earthquake in northeastern Japan and the subsequent meltdown at the Fukushima

There are large seismic faults, capable of producing earthquakes at the 7 or 8 magnitude level, near each of Japan’s nuclear plants, including the reprocessing plant at Rokkasho. It is hard to believe that there is any nuclear plant that would not be damaged by a magnitude 8 earthquake.

A representative case is the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant itself, where it has become clear that the fault under the sea nearby also extends inland. The Rokkasho plant, where the nuclear waste (death ash) from all the nuclear plants in Japan is collected, is located on land under which the Pacific Plate and the North American Plate meet. That is, the plate that is the greatest danger to the Rokkasho plant, is now in motion deep beneath Japan.

The Rokkasho plant was originally built with the very low earthquake resistance factor of 375 gals. (Translator’s note: The gal, or galileo, is a unit used to measure peak ground acceleration during earthquakes. Unlike the scales measuring an earthquake’s general intensity, it measures actual ground motion in particular locations.) Today its resistance factor has been raised to only 450 gals, despite the fact that recently in Japan earthquakes registering over 2000 gals have been occurring one after another. Worse, the Shimokita Peninsula is an extremely fragile geologic formation that was at the bottom of the sea as recently as the sea rise of the Jomon period (the Flandrian Transgression) 5000 years ago; if an earthquake occurred there it could be completely destroyed.

The Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant is where expended nuclear fuel from all of Japan’s nuclear power plants is collected, and then reprocessed so as to separate out the plutonium, the uranium, and the remaining highly radioactive liquid waste. In short, it is the most dangerous factory in the world.

At the Rokkasho plant, 240 cubic meters of radioactive liquid waste are now stored. A failure to take care of this properly could lead to a nuclear catastrophe surpassing the meltdown of a reactor. This liquid waste continuously generates heat, and must be constantly cooled. But if an earthquake were to damage the cooling pipes or cut off the electricity, the liquid would begin to boil. According to an analysis prepared by the German nuclear industry, an explosion of this facility could expose persons within a 100 kilometer radius from the plant to radiation 10 to 100 times the lethal level, which presumably means instant death.

On April 7, just one month after the 3/11 earthquake in northeastern Japan, there was a large aftershock. At the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant the electricity was shut off. The pool containing nuclear fuel and the radioactive liquid waste were (barely) cooled down by the emergency generators, meaning that Japan was brought to the brink of destruction. But the Japanese media, as usual, paid this almost no notice.

[justdrew]

High radiation levels at Ohio nuclear plant prompt NRC "special inspection"

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission today issued a statement confirming that workers at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant in northeast Ohio evacuated the plant on April 22 after radiation levels rose as the plant was shutting down for refueling. The plant is safe, according to the NRC, and workers are not believed to have been exposed to radiation levels beyond federally-recommended limits. A special inspection team from the NRC began work on Monday, and will review the circumstances surrounding the incident. From AP:

The commission says radiation levels rose when workers were removing a monitor that measures nuclear reactions during start-up and shutdown. The nuclear reactor, owned by Akron-based FirstEnergy Corp., is about 35 miles northeast of Cleveland. A FirstEnergy spokesman did not immediately return a request for comment after business hours Tuesday.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42771883

[seemslikeadream]

Radioactive Strontium found in Hilo Hawaii milk (EPA - Reported Today in Forbes)

http://blogs.forbes.com/jeffmcmahon/201 ... waii-milk/

Radioactive Strontium Found in Hilo, Hawaii Milk
Apr. 27 2011 - 8:45 am
By JEFF MCMAHON

Image by Getty Images North America via @daylife
A radioactive isotope of strontium has been detected in American milk for the first time since Japan’s nuclear disaster—in a sample from Hilo, Hawaii—the Environmental Protection Agency revealed yesterday.

“We have completed our first strontium milk sample analysis and found trace amounts of strontium-89 in a milk sample from Hilo, Hawaii. The level was approximately 27,000 times below the Derived Intervention Level set by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration,” EPA said in a statement emailed to me yesterday afternoon. EPA posted the test result at epa.gov in a pdf.

EPA found 1.4 picoCuries per liter of strontium-89 in a milk sample collected in Hilo on April 4.

More at url

What troubles me is that they say they have no other results, but if you follow Jeff McMahon's Frobes Blog you will see that there ARE more EPA reports for detection of radio-Strontium.

They salso say that if they see radio-Cesium they suspect they will find radiostrontium.

This sucks but was not unexpected.

PLEASE send this link along wherever you can (to the Forbes blog) and DEMAND more testing for Strontium radionuclides as this is one of the MOST insidious of the radionuclides we are exposed to

.

[seemslikeadream]

i guess i fucked up

all better now?