Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
rothbardian wrote:
So...I am proposing that NASA is hiding something. Maybe something BIG. What might it be exactly? I don't know exactly. But limiting the conversation by saying that we cannot justifiably review any potential scam or hoaxing in regard to the NASA space program...is completely absurd.
I am not (repeat...not) hot on the trail of exposing a faked moon mission, but in trying to undertake an overall review of the bigger picture of what NASA and the government might be up to...I am being told that certain topics are 'verboten'.
Occult Means Hidden wrote:
Seriously though, I don't agree that credibility is automatically thrown out the window as soon as an individual starts claiming something contrary (moon landing fakery) to accepted wisdom.
What right do we have to throw it out the window?
Why is the moon landing a sacred cow?
I mean it's not as if you and I can prove it by hopping over to the moon and looking for evidence.
Where do you see proof of one light source (the sun) on the moon in those photos?
orz wrote:"Diverging shadows" is out and out gibberish, and I have no idea how on earth it's supposed to demonstrate that the photos are fake. It makes no sense.
jingofever wrote:This guy addresses diverging shadows. What should the shadows be doing?
rothbardian wrote:Orz makes the comment-- "Certainly as i said NASA (like anyone) will alter/clean up images for publicity purposes."
rothbardian wrote:And then there's Nomo, gatekeeper for Pleasantville, dishing out the punishment for broaching forbidden topics? You've really got to watch that movie, Nomo. You'll recognize yourself instantly. (Or were you just having a little fun? I'm not sure of your views on the government's capacity for great, premeditated evil.)
rothbardian wrote:If I am understanding the thought processes here...it's OK to point out "hoaxing' elements as long as we understand that it's only being done for less sordid purposes...not greatly sordid purposes. That's seems completely arbitrary. It's like those who argue against 9/11 'truth' because they can only conceive of the Bush cabal perpetrating 'minor' evil as opposed to 'great' evil.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests