Basra: giant badgers; fear of man-eating bear-like monsters

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Basra: giant badgers; fear of man-eating bear-like monsters

Postby Jeff » Wed Jul 11, 2007 3:29 pm

Giant badgers terrorise Iraqi port city

Wed Jul 11, 11:51 AM ET

BASRA, Iraq (AFP) - The Iraqi port city of Basra, already prey to a nasty turf war between rival militia factions, has now been gripped by a new fear -- a giant badger stalking the streets by night.

Local farmers have caught and killed several of the beasts, but this has done nothing to dispel rumours of a bear-like monster that eats humans and was allegedly released into the area by British forces to spread panic.

Iraqi scientists have attempted to calm the public but, amid the confusion and mistrust spawned by the ongoing guerrilla war, the story has spread like wildfire in the streets of the city and the villages round about.

Mushtaq Abdul-Mahdi, director of Basra's veterinary hospital, has inspected the corpses of several dead badgers and tries to reassure his fellow citizens that they are not a new post-war arrival in the region.

"These animals appeared before the fall of the regime in 1986. They are known as Al-Ghirayri and locally as Al-Girta," he told AFP. "Talk that this animal was brought by the British forces is incorrect and unscientific."

British troops have been based in Basra since the 2003 US-led invasion overthrew dictator Saddam Hussein, and the 5,500 that remain still face the threat of Shiite militias battling for the region's oil resources.

They also have to battle the Iraqi rumour mill, as locals are quick to blame them for almost any calamity that befalls the area -- including an apparent plague of vicious badgers with long claws and powerful jaws.

British army spokesman Major David Gell said the animals were thought to be a kind of honey badger -- melivora capensis -- which can be fierce but are not usually dangerous to humans unless provoked.

"They are native to the region but rare in Iraq. They're nocturnal carnivores with a fearsome reputation, but they don't stalk humans and carry them back to their lair," he said.

Both the scientists and the soldiers agree that the badger ought not to be a danger to humans, but so far they have failed to reassure the populace.

"I was sleeping at night when this strange animal hit me on my head. I have not seen such an animal before. My husband hurried to shoot it but it was as swift as a deer," said Suad Hassan, a 30-year-old housewife.

"It is the size of a dog but his head is like a monkey. It runs so quickly."

Cell phone video of the badgers circulating in Basra shows a stocky skunk-like animal with long front claws.

The honey badger, or ratel, is known as a brave predator capable of killing a cobra. It weighs up to 14 kilos (30 pounds), not usually known as man-eater.

Sattar Jabbar, a 50-year-old local farmer from Abu Sakhar north of Basra, believes the badger can tackle even large prey.

"I saw it three days ago at night attacking animals. It even ate a cow. It tore the cow up piece by piece. I tried to shoot it with my gun but it ran away into the orchards. I missed it," he said.

In Iraq there can be only one explanation for an animal so vicious.

"I believe this animal appeared following a raid to the region by the British forces," said Ali Mohsen, a farmer in his 40s from Karmat Ali, near the air base used by the multinational force.

"As we are close to the airport, they probably released this animal into the area," he reasoned.

Amid such tales, there is little experts like Dr Ghazi Yaqub Azzam, deputy dean of the veterinary college, can do to reassure his neighbours.

"Its nature is to eat small animals like hens and rats. It has powerful senses of hearing and smell. It gets aggressive if senses danger, but it doesn't attack man unless threatened," he said.

Azzam speculated that the badgers were being driven towards the city because Iraq is trying to re-flood marshland north of Basra that was drained by Saddam in order to persecute local Marsh Arab tribes.

For all that, the British army thinks Basrawis have little to fear.

"If you cornered it and poked it with a stick, then the smart money would be on the badger," warned Gell, who has faced many rumours like this one in his tour in Iraq.

"We have not released giant badgers in Basra," he said, "and nor have we been collecting eggs and releasing serpents into the Shatt al-Arab river."

link
User avatar
Jeff
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11134
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2000 8:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby nomo » Wed Jul 11, 2007 4:03 pm

User avatar
nomo
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:48 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby orz » Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:21 pm

Man eating badgers!? :shock:

If you put all the most extreme reports together you get a pretty insane picture. Killer badgers, giant spiders, robot drones, massacres with secret experimental weapon systems, factions of forign fighters and unregulated international mercenaries... It's starting to sound like a game of Doom for real over there.

I suspect the truth is probably a little less sci-fi but actually even more horrific.
orz
 
Posts: 4107
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 9:25 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Telexx » Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:50 pm

If you looked inside GWB's head, would you find John Romero's head on a stick?!

http://doom.wikia.com/wiki/Romero's_head

Thanks,

Telexx
User avatar
Telexx
 
Posts: 466
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 3:11 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Sepka » Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:05 pm

This made my day. It's like the plot of a particularly bizarre, forgotten Hammer film!
- Sepka the Space Weasel

One Furry Mofo!
User avatar
Sepka
 
Posts: 1983
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 2:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby nomo » Sat Jul 14, 2007 11:31 am

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 ... 30,00.html

Iranians arrest 14 squirrels for spying
Islamic Republic's intelligence agents allege rodents were carrying advanced Western spy gear
Dudi Cohen
Published: 07.13.07, 23:43 / Israel News

Iranian intelligence operatives recently detained over a dozen squirrels found within the nation's borders, claiming the rodents were serving as spies for Western powers determined to undermine the Islamic Republic.

"In recent weeks, intelligence operatives have arrested 14 squirrels within Iran's borders," state-sponsored news agency IRNA reported. "The squirrels were carrying spy gear of foreign agencies, and were stopped before they could act, thanks to the alertness of our intelligence services."

Iranian police commander Esmaeil Ahmadi-Moqadam confirmed the report, saying that a number of squirrels had been caught bearing foreign spy gear within Iran's borders.

"I heard of this but I have no specific knowledge on the subject," he said. He refused to give further details.

Recently, Iran has increased its efforts in combating espionage by the West. The use of rodents has not been documented in the past.
User avatar
nomo
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:48 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Stephen Morgan » Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:13 pm

nomo wrote:http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3425130,00.html

Iranians arrest 14 squirrels for spying


Should think so to.

http://www.raven1.net/nessie/40.htm

For self-evident reasons, mastery of synthetic telepathy has long been a goal of the powers-that-be. As my regular readers already know, technological developments over the last fifty years have made it possible to project voices, images, and emotions into the human mind by electronic and acoustic methods. The rest of you should get up to speed. You can start by checking out the work of Frey, Persinger (see links at the end of this column) and White.

The ability to extract voices, images, and emotions from the human mind is even more valuable. Development has proven somewhat more problematic. Nevertheless, significant advances have been made. It greatly behooves us to be familiar with them and cognizant of their implications.

The eyes, they say, are the windows of the soul. As any competent poker player can tell you, even the staunchest of poker faces can reveal much about the holder's hand and mind set. Involuntary pupil dilation is one dead give away. So are eye movements, both voluntary and involuntary.

Traditionally, skill at noting this was acquired the hard way, by losing money at the table. These days, the process has been computerized. Technology has been developed which automates the process of eye gaze analysis. It is being marketed as a "revolutionary communication tool." The Eye-Gaze Response Interface Computer Aid (ERICA ) system interfaces with a standard Windows computer to capture a person's eye movements as they view a computer screen. Web page designers and marketing engineers no longer have to guess what captures their audience's attention.

That the machines of our masters can see into our eyes is disturbing enough. But it gets worse. Now they want to be able to see out of our eyes. To that end, a team of U.S. scientists have wired a computer to a cat's brain and created videos of what the animal was seeing. Garrett Stanley, Yang Dang and Fei Li, from the Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, reported in the Journal of Neuroscience that they attached electrodes to 177 cells in the thalamus region of the cat's brain and monitored their activity. They recorded the patterns of firing from the cells in a computer. They then used a technique they describe as a "linear decoding technique" to "reconstruct natural scenes with recognizable moving objects."

This technology presents some disturbing possible scenarios to any political activist, investigative journalist, or garden variety paranoid who lives with a cat. If you can't trust your cat, who can you trust? Hint: It's a very short list. But can you trust your cat? Thanks to modern wireless technology, and decades of implant research, that now depends on a number of factors. Has your cat ever disappeared, then miraculously reappeared days, weeks, even months later? Did you check her for strange scars? Does she like to watch the computer screen while you type? When fellow activists come over for a meeting, does she attend? When you have sex, does she take unnatural interest? How do you know for sure that her thalamus hasn't been wired, and certain people are not even now watching you through her eyes, by way of a surgically implanted transponder and wires in her brain?

How do you know that Jose Delgado-type implants, a decades old technology, are not being used to aim her eyes in your direction? How do you know if a transponder has not been also wired to miniature microphone implants (According to Victor Marchetti the CIA first attempted this years ago. Radio implants were attached to a cat's cochlea, to facilitate the pinpointing of specific conversations, freed from extraneous surrounding noises. The cat was run over by a taxi on its first assignment. As Martin Cannon points out, though, there was nothing to stop the Agency from getting another cat, or from using a human being.), so they can also listen in on your conversations? You don't know. You can't know, not for sure, not unless you get her x-rayed. So go to you nearest vet immediately. Tell him you want him to x-ray your cat because you think that your enemies might have wired her brain so they could watch you through her eyes. See what happens.

E-mail me an account later. I'll add it to my collection.

Then there's the commonplace technology that enables the powers-that-be, or even a clever stalker, to sense your emotional state from a distance. It turns out that a cell phone reveals two vital signs: a person's pulse and breathing rate. The person does not even have to answer the phone. While the phone must be switched on, you do not have to answer it for the system to work. Just making it ring generates enough of a signal to allow the heart and lung data to be piggybacked onto the signal that tells the caller your phone is ringing.

Bell Labs engineers noticed that some of the microwaves transmitted by a cell phone's antenna bounce back to the phone from the user's chest, heart, and lungs. As those organs move, the frequency of the reflected radiation is Doppler-shifted by a tiny amount. If the lung is expanding, the radiation bouncing off it is pushed closer together, slightly raising the frequency. A contracting lung lowers the frequency. The variation is tiny: one hertz in a billion. The signals are very low-frequency. They are easy to separate from a voice.

Bell Labs, which is owned by Lucent Technologies Inc., now plans to modify the mobile phone with a circuit that detects the Doppler shift in the reflected signal picked up by its antenna. The phone then sends this data on to the base station, where further processing extracts the user's vital signs.

Doctors could also use the Bell Labs technology routinely to monitor a patient's heart or breathing – just by calling the patient's cell phone. Researchers used a radio with similar frequency and power to a typical mobile phone to demonstrate the effect in their lab. They are now building a prototype detector.

Or so they say. For all we know, though, this is merely a cover story. The military and intelligence communities could easily have been in possession of this technology for quite some time and it is only now that they are breaking it to us gently. This is often the case with technological innovations that have military and/or intelligence applications. This is particularly true for technology that enables covert tracking and experimentation on unwitting human guinea pigs.

One clue that the U.S. government is interested in developing this specific kind of technology is a report entitled "Measurement of Heart and Breathing Signals of Human Subjects through Barriers with Micro-Wave Life Detections Systems," which was prepared for the 1988 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, under P.O. #19Y-CC519V for the Department of the Navy and Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant, in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant is operated by noted defense contractor Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.

Then there's the matter of brain waves. Gary Selden, in an article entitled "Machines that Read Minds," in Science Digest, October 1981, noted:

. . . in scores of laboratories throughout the world researchers (are) using a new computer technology to read and record portions of the brain's vast internal hubbub. From this electronic mind reading they are beginning to learn which brain waves appear consistently with which sights, sounds and other stimuli.

The waveform that the brain characteristically emits after absorbing an external event is called an evoked potential or an event-related potential. . .

Evoked potentials may constitute one of the most complex languages humans have ever tried to decipher, but even the limited vocabulary we already have is a versatile diagnostic tool and a guide to formerly uncharted aspects of the brain's activity. No one knows where a complete dictionary of the mind could take us.

Two decades later we are finally beginning to find out. Research has gone far beyond mere logging of evoked potential signatures. Brain wave patterns associated with words, even with sentences, can now be recognized. According to a report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, dated Dec. 1998:

Electrical and magnetic brain waves of two subjects were recorded for the purpose of recognizing which one of 12 sentences or 7 words auditorily presented was processed. . . . Recognition rates . . . varied, but the best were above 90 percent. The first words of prototypes of sentences also were . . . test(ed) . . . The best result was above 80 percent correct recognition.

Machines that read minds have now developed to the point that they can be used in legal proceedings. An Iowa judge ruled that Dr. Lawrence Farwell's proprietary and patented technique of Brain Fingerprinting is admissible in court.

Brain Fingerprinting is (supposedly) a "revolutionary new technology for investigating crimes and exonerating innocent suspects, with a record of 100 percent accuracy in research on FBI agents, research with U.S. government agencies, and field applications." Brain Fingerprinting (supposedly) "determines objectively what information is stored in a person's brain by measuring brain-wave responses to relevant words or pictures flashed on a computer screen."

Brain Fingerprinting (supposedly) "solves the central problem by determining scientifically whether a suspect has the details of a crime stored in his brain. It has received extensive media coverage around the world." Coverage has included TV magazine show 60 Minutes, CBS Evening News, and US News and World Report. If you missed it, you weren't paying enough attention. The technology is (supposedly) fully developed and available for application.

Farwell conducted a Brain Fingerprinting test on Terry Harrington, who is serving a life sentence in Iowa for a 1977 murder. The test showed that the record stored in Harrington's brain did not match the crime scene and did match the alibi. Harrington filed a petition for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, including Brain Fingerprinting. In a ruling on March 5, Pottawattamie County District Court Judge Tim O'Grady admitted Dr. Lawrence Farwell's Brain Fingerprinting test of Terry Harrington as evidence in the case.

That electronic mind reading is now admissible in a court of law should give us all pause. The potential for abuse is enormous. That the FBI, a known terrorist organization, is involved in the research should be particularly disturbing. That your own hard-earned tax money is being used to develop the technological means to steal the most intimate thoughts from your mind should provoke nothing short of outrage. But what are you going to do about it? You'd better do something, and soon, before it's too late.

Whatever it is, e-mail me an account later. I'll add it to my collection.


– – –

Frey and Persinger links:

www.spunk.org/texts/pubs/openeye/sp000944.txt

www.raven1.net/v2succes.htm

www.raven1.net/frey.htm

www.spunk.org/texts/pubs/openeye/sp000944.txt

www.brooks.af.mil/AFRL/HED/hedr/reports ... mtb31.html

abcnews.go.com/sections/living/SecondOpinion/secondopinion_6.html

www.jps.net/brainsci/

users.lycaeum.org/~martins/M2/helmets.html

www.sightings.com/politics5/mindcontrols.htm

www.focus.org.uk/alien.htm


Good night. And don't have nightmares.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

Postby noen » Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:37 pm

Sorry Stephen Morgan, but if you are experiencing this then you are actively delusional. You need help, you need to take your meds.

Paranoid Schizophrenia is a terrible disease and people who suffer from it experience auditory hallucinations that really, truly seem to them to come from outside of themselves. They are wrong. The voices do not originate from outside. They are the result of a mind that is slowly disintegrating and slipping into madness.

The CIA is not reading your thoughts. Your cat is not a CIA agent spying on you. The CIA is not joyriding your cat and getting off watching you fuck. That is your disease talking.

The technology you talk about does not exist or needs a very special lab environment to be done. Like, you know, doing surgery and inserting wires. Jose Delgado's experiments never went beyond the cheap parlor trick stage. Didn't work with higher order animals much less humans.

Paranoid Schizophrenics have given us plenty of fantastic fiction to read, it can be very entertaining. From Shaver's BDSM porn to Ritual Satanic abuse. You just have to keep in mind that these accounts are the result of diseased minds and are not real.
noen
 
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 5:46 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Stephen Morgan » Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:29 am

noen, I present only facts. I don't suggest that my non-existent cat is watching me fuck under a CIA remote control. I was posting an article by Bob Ness, who may or may not own a cat. Nonetheless, the technology exists. All the more reason not the have a pet. Don't think being a human helps, either. They can just use the EDOM on you after putting in the remote control chip and remote video feed. Fly over, turn off your car, knock you out, destroy your memory and make you a mind slave. Just like the aliens.
Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that all was vanity; but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, and make it possible. -- Lawrence of Arabia
User avatar
Stephen Morgan
 
Posts: 3736
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2007 6:37 am
Location: England
Blog: View Blog (9)

Postby robert d reed » Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:56 am

Don't think being a human helps, either. They can just use the EDOM on you after putting in the remote control chip and remote video feed. Fly over, turn off your car, knock you out, destroy your memory and make you a mind slave. Just like the aliens.


Yess...and I defy you to prove that this hasn't happened to yourself already.
formerly robertdreed...
robert d reed
 
Posts: 661
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 7:14 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

scan your mind the rest will follow

Postby Trifecta » Tue Jul 17, 2007 12:25 pm

the future is already here—it just got distributed to the wealthy first
User avatar
Trifecta
 
Posts: 1013
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 4:20 am
Location: mu, the place in between dualism
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby nomo » Tue Jul 17, 2007 2:58 pm

Stephen Morgan wrote: If you can't trust your cat, who can you trust?


http://www.mr-lee-catcam.de/index.htm

Sometimes I have some challenging ideas, or crazy like some other people would say. This time I thought about our cat who is the whole day out, returning sometimes hungry sometimes not, sometimes with traces of fights, sometimes he stay also the night out.
When he finally returns, I wonder where he was and what he did during his day. This brought me to the idea to equip the cat with a camera. The plan was to put a little camera around his neck which takes every few minutes a picture. After he is returning, the camera would show his day. First I thought about transmitting live pictures from a remote RF camera, but the equipment is too expensive and battery consumption is too high.

So the idea was born and split into these parts:

* find small, lightweight, inexpensive digital camera
* develop a controller for the camera
* protect the camera from cat attack
* mount equipment to cat
User avatar
nomo
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:48 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests