See Who's Editing Wikipedia

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

See Who's Editing Wikipedia

Postby nomo » Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:36 pm

No surprise there, really.

http://www.wired.com/politics/onlinerig ... ntPage=all

See Who's Editing Wikipedia - Diebold, the CIA, a Campaign
By John Borland


On November 17th, 2005, an anonymous Wikipedia user deleted 15 paragraphs from an article on e-voting machine-vendor Diebold, excising an entire section critical of the company's machines. While anonymous, such changes typically leave behind digital fingerprints offering hints about the contributor, such as the location of the computer used to make the edits.

In this case, the changes came from an IP address reserved for the corporate offices of Diebold itself. And it is far from an isolated case. A new data-mining service launched Monday traces millions of Wikipedia entries to their corporate sources, and for the first time puts comprehensive data behind longstanding suspicions of manipulation, which until now have surfaced only piecemeal in investigations of specific allegations.

Wikipedia Scanner -- the brainchild of CalTech computation and neural-systems graduate student Virgil Griffith -- offers users a searchable database that ties millions of anonymous Wikipedia edits to organizations where those edits apparently originated, by cross-referencing the edits with data on who owns the associated block of internet IP addresses.

Inspired by news last year that Congress members' offices had been editing their own entries, Griffith says he got curious, and wanted to know whether big companies and other organizations were doing things in a similarly self-interested vein.

"Everything's better if you do it on a huge scale, and automate it," he says with a grin.

This database is possible thanks to a combination of Wikipedia policies and (mostly) publicly available information.

The online encyclopedia allows anyone to make edits, but keeps detailed logs of all these changes. Users who are logged in are tracked only by their user name, but anonymous changes leave a public record of their IP address.

The organization also allows downloads of the complete Wikipedia, including records of all these changes.

Griffith thus downloaded the entire encyclopedia, isolating the XML-based records of anonymous changes and IP addresses. He then correlated those IP addresses with public net-address lookup services such as ARIN, as well as private domain-name data provided by IP2Location.com.

The result: A database of 5.3 million edits, performed by 2.6 million organizations or individuals ranging from the CIA to Microsoft to Congressional offices, now linked to the edits they or someone at their organization's net address has made.

Some of this appears to be transparently self-interested, either adding positive, press release-like material to entries, or deleting whole swaths of critical material.

Voting-machine company Diebold provides a good example of the latter, with someone at the company's IP address apparently deleting long paragraphs detailing the security industry's concerns over the integrity of their voting machines, and information about the company's CEO's fund-raising for President George Bush.

The text, deleted in November 2005, was quickly restored by another Wikipedia contributor, who advised the anonymous editor, "Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism."

A Diebold Election Systems spokesman said he'd look into the matter but could not comment by press time.

Wal-Mart has a series of relatively small changes in 2005 that that burnish the company's image on its own entry while often leaving criticism in, changing a line that its wages are less than other retail stores to a note that it pays nearly double the minimum wage, for example. Another leaves activist criticism on community impact intact, while citing a "definitive" study showing Wal-Mart raised the total number of jobs in a community.

As has been previously reported, politician's offices are heavy users of the system. Former Montana Senator Conrad Burns' office, for example, apparently changed one critical paragraph headed "A controversial voice" to "A voice for farmers," with predictably image-friendly content following it.

Perhaps interestingly, many of the most apparently self-interested changes come from before 2006, when news of the Congressional offices' edits reached the headlines. This may indicate a growing sophistication with the workings of Wikipedia over time, or even the rise of corporate Wikipedia policies.

Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales told Wired News he was aware of the new service, but needed time to experiment with it before commenting.

The vast majority of changes are fairly innocuous, however. Employees at the CIA's net address, for example, have been busy -- but with little that would indicate their place of apparent employment, or a particular bias.

One entry on "Black September in Jordan" contains wholesale additions, with specific details that read like a popular history book or an eyewitness' memoir.

Many more are simple copy edits, or additions to local town entries or school histories. One CIA entry deals with the details of lyrics sung in a Buffy the Vampire Slayer episode.

Griffith says he launched the project hoping to find scandals, particularly at obvious targets such as companies like Halliburton. But there's a more practical goal, too: By exposing the anonymous edits that companies such as drugs and big pharmaceutical companies make in entries that affect their businesses, it could help experts check up on the changes and make sure they're accurate, he says.

For now, he has just scratched the surface of the database of millions of entries. But he's putting it online so others can look too.

The nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation, which runs Wikipedia, did not respond to e-mail and telephone inquiries Monday.
User avatar
nomo
 
Posts: 3388
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:48 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chiggerbit » Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:10 pm

I was a bit nonplussed to find that the version of the Wiki entry I had saved on Joseph E. Schmitz was quite different than the current one up on Wiki. Take a look, compare the old entry to the lower new entry:


Old one

Joseph E. Schmitz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Jump to: navigation, search
Joseph Edward Schmitz Conservative lawyer, former Inspector General of the Department of Defense (March 21, 2002-September 9, 2005), and current executive with Blackwater USA, a private contractor providing security services to the U.S. military.

Contents
[hide]
1 Biography
2 Schmitz as Inspector General
3 Resignation
4 Similar Actions of Bush Administration Officials
5 Bibliography and Links



[edit]
Biography
Parents: Joseph Edward Schmitz is the son of the late John G. Schmitz, former California State Senator, Member of the U.S. House of Representatives, and U.S. Presidential candidate (1972). John Schmitz was famous for his right-wing views and occasional racist and homophobic remarks. His public career was ended when it was revealed that he had an affair and fathered two illegitimate children. John Schmitz's seven legitimate children include former George H.W. Bush White House counsel John P. Schmitz, Jerome T. Schmitz, Theresa Manion, Elizabeth Crnkovich, Philip Schmitz (who tragically drowned as a baby in the family pool), convicted child rapist Mary Kay Letourneau, and Joseph Edward Schmitz.

Education: Schmitz attended Catholic schools as a child and Georgetown Preparatory School while his father served in Congress. He holds a B.S. (1978) from the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland and a J.D. (1986) from Stanford University. He was on the wrestling team at the Naval Academy.

Professional Career: Upon graduation from the Naval Academy, Schmitz served in the U.S. Navy for approximately four years, including a stint as an exchange officer with the German Navy. Schmitz left active duty and was in the Naval Reserve until 2002, when he retired with the rank of Captain. After leaving active duty, Schmitz attended law school. He clerked with James L. Buckley, Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and was a special assistant to Attorney General Edwin Meese III during the Reagan Administration. Schmitz entered the private sector in 1987, eventually joining the Washington DC firm of Patton Boggs LLP. He was an adjunct professor of law at Georgetown University in the 1990s. In 2001, he was nominated by President George W. Bush for the position of Inspector General of the Department of Defense.

Schmitz is a member of the Federalist Society and the Sovereign Military Order of Malta. He was also an attorney for US English, an organization devoted to making English the official language of the United States, and a "Young Leader Alumnus of the American Council on Germany."

A young Schmitz was portrayed by child actor Cody Jones in the TV movie "The Mary Kay LeTourneau Story: All-American Girl" (2000).

Schmitz was mentioned by name on a September 2002 "Dateline NBC" episode entitled "Teacher's Pet" about sister Mary Kay Letourneau.

[edit]
Schmitz as Inspector General
Schmitz was nominated by President George W. Bush to be Defense Department Inspector General on June 18, 2001. His nomination was held up in the Senate Armed Services Committee for unknown reasons until March 21, 2002, when he was confirmed by the full Senate by voice vote. In his confirmation hearings, committee Democrats expressed concern about a letter that Schmitz had written to the Washington Times in 1991 in which he had accused then-candidate Bill Clinton of treasonous actions and had inappropriately signed the letter with his military rank.

According to an AP report dated December 5, 2001, the Inspector General's office had recently failed a "peer review" audit in which it was shown that IG officials had destroyed documents relating to an investigation. Iowa Republican Senator Charles Grassley, a supporter of the Schmitz nomination and critic of the IG's office, commented that "[o]nce President Bush's nominee for the IG job is in place, he will need to clean house from top to bottom. Heads must roll," because of the document destruction.

Upon taking office, Schmitz hired L. Jean Lewis, a Republican operative and whistleblower in the Whitewater Affair. Lewis, a former Resolution Trust Corporation investigator, was a pivotal figure in publicizing the alleged financial misdeeds of President Bill Clinton and wife Senator Hillary Rodham-Clinton. She marketed products with pictures of Mrs. Clinton and the logo "B.I.T.C.H.: Bill, I'm Taking Charge. Hillary." Schmitz eventually created the position of "Chief of Staff" for Lewis.

Insight Magazine, in its September 30, 2002, issue, reported that shortly after his arrival at the IG, Schmitz ordered a "bottom-up review" that was conducted by Military Professionals Resources, Inc. (MPRI), a defense contractor based in Alexandria, Va. The review resulted in the removal of a number of senior civil servants in the agency. Sen. Grassley quoted by Insight, said, "The new inspector general, Mr. Joe Schmitz, has already started to clean house. Heads have started to roll with more to come . . . Based on what I've heard and seen, the Independent Review Team appears to be on the right track. The team appears to see the very same problems that I see and seems to be headed toward a hard-hitting final report." According to the September 23, 2002 issue of Defense Week, the removed civil servants filed a complaint with the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, a government agency that investigates whistleblower complaints and Hatch Act violations. In its June 23, 2003 issue, Defense Week reported that the matter was settled to the satisfaction of both parties involved, but suggested that the removed civil servants had been vindicated.

According to the Los Angeles Times (September 25, 2005), Schmitz had an "unusual fascination" with Baron Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben, a Prussian officer appointed Inspector General of the Continental Army by George Washington. "The Nation" (September 25, 2005) magazine reported that Schmitz spent three months redesigning the seal of the Inspector General's office to include elements of von Steuben's family crest, including the von Steuben family motto, Sub Tutela Altissimi Semper, "Under the Protection of the Almighty." (Schmitz was quoted in the LA Times article as saying that the eagle of the previous seal looked "like a chicken".) Schmitz authored an article in the in-house journal of the federal inspectors general about Von Steuben and mentioned him in virtually every speech he made while in office ("The Enduring Legacy of Inspector General von Steuben," Public Inquiry, F/W 2002, [1]. "He was consumed with all things German and all things Von Steuben," said a government official quoted in the LA Times article. "He was obsessed."

Schmitz also took an unusual interest in the sex slave trade. His office investigated the involvement of the U.S. military in the sex trade in South Korea, Bosnia, and Kosovo, but found little beyond the propensity of soldiers to frequent brothels, an inexcusable moral lapse, according to Schmitz's testimony before Congress and an article he wrote that was published on the website of the World Security Network,[2].

Schmitz's downfall apparently began when he and John A. "Jack" Shaw, former DoD Deputy Undersecretary for International Technology Security signed an agreement giving Shaw authority to investigate telecommunications contracting fraud in Iraq sometime in 2003. According to the Los Angeles Times (September 3, 2005), Shaw used the results of his investigation to steer contracts to friends. When confronted with the case, Schmitz referred it to the FBI for investigation, even though IG agents claimed they had enough evidence of Shaw's illegal activities for prosecution.

The Los Angeles Times article also claims that Schmitz interfered in other investigations of senior officials:

The Air Force Academy sex scandal, in which senior Air Force Academy officials were accused of failing to investigate rape allegations by female cadets.

A contracting scandal involving the Air Force and Boeing Corporation, in which senior Air Force officials, including former Air Force Secretary James Roche, were accused of steering contracts to the Boeing Corporation. Before presenting his report to Congress, Schmitz allegedly sent it to the White House for review. The names of several White House officials were reportedly redacted from the report. Sen. Charles Grassley was quoted by the Los Angeles Times as saying to Schmitz, "That decision … raises questions about your independence."

Grassley, who had become disillusioned with Schmitz, was particularly upset by Schmitz's plans to travel to Potsdam, Germany at taxpayer expense, where he was to speak at a ceremony commemorating Baron von Steuben. Schmitz was forced to cancel the trip.

[edit]
Resignation
Schmitz resigned as Defense Department Inspector General on September 9, 2005 in order to take a position with the Prince Group a holding company for Blackwater USA, which provides security services and training to the U.S. military in Iraq and elsewhere. In a letter dated June 15, 2005, and posted on the Inspector General's website on September 2, 2005, Schmitz recused himself from investigating all matters related to Blackwater.

The Los Angeles Times quoted Danielle Bryan of the Project on Government Oversight as saying, "He's a person who did not put the appearance of ethics above all else . . . That is not the way the government should function. These are the kind of things that make the general public distrust government."

[edit]
Similar Actions of Bush Administration Officials
See also Janet Rehnquist, former Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services and Scott Bloch, Office of the Special Counsel.

[edit]
Bibliography and Links
NNDB Page [3].

Inspector General of the Department of Defense website [4].

Schmitz official DoD biography [5].

BlackwaterUSA website [6].

"Politicization of Inspectors General" [7], a report released by Ranking Member Henry Waxman (D-CA) of the House Committee on Government Reform.

"The Scrutinizer Finds Himself Under Scrutiny," T. Christian Miller, Los Angeles Times, September 25, 2005. [8]

"How Many More Mike Browns Are Out There?," Mark Thompson, Karen Tumulty, Time Magazine, October 3, 2005. [9]

"No FBI Charges for Defense Official in Iraq Case," T. Christian Miller, Los Angeles Times, October 15, 2005. [10]

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_E._Schmitz"





New one

Joseph E. Schmitz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Joseph Edward Schmitz is a conservative lawyer, former Inspector General of the Department of Defense and executive with Blackwater USA, a private contractor providing security services to the U.S. military.

Contents
[hide]
1 Biography
2 Inspector General of the Department of Defense
3 Resignation
4 See Also
5 References
6 Links



[edit] Biography
Joseph Edward Schmitz is the son of the John G. Schmitz, former California State Senator, Member of the U.S. House of Representatives, and U.S. Presidential candidate (1972). Schmitz attended Catholic schools as a child and Georgetown Preparatory School while his father served in Congress. He holds a B.S. (1978) from the U.S. Naval Academy in Annapolis, Maryland and a J.D. (1986) from Stanford University. He was on the wrestling team at the Naval Academy. His siblings include Mary Kay Letourneau and John Patrick Schmitz.[1]

Upon graduation from the Naval Academy, Schmitz served in the U.S. Navy for approximately four years, including a stint as an exchange officer with the German Navy. Schmitz left active duty and was in the Naval Reserve until 2001. After leaving active duty, Schmitz attended law school. He clerked with James L. Buckley, Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and was a special assistant to Attorney General Edwin Meese III during the Reagan Administration. Schmitz entered the private sector in 1987, eventually joining the Washington DC firm of Patton Boggs LLP.[2] He was an adjunct professor of law at Georgetown University in the 1990s.


[edit] Inspector General of the Department of Defense
Schmitz was nominated by President George W. Bush to be Defense Department Inspector General on June 18, 2001. His nomination was held up in the Senate Armed Services Committee for unknown reasons until March 21, 2002, when he was confirmed by the full Senate by voice vote.


[edit] Resignation
Schmitz resigned as Defense Department Inspector General on September 9, 2005 in order to take a position with the Prince Group, a holding company for Blackwater USA, which provides security services and training to the U.S. military in Iraq and elsewhere. In a letter dated June 15, 2005, and posted on the Inspector General's website on September 2, 2005, Schmitz recused himself from investigating all matters related to Blackwater.


[edit] See Also
Janet Rehnquist, former Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services
Scott Bloch, Office of the Special Counsel
Robert Cobb, Inspector General of NASA

[edit] References
^ http://www.nndb.com/people/466/000104154/
^ Scahill, Blackwater, 303.
Miller, T. Christian. (2006). Blood Money: Wasted Billions, Lost Lives, and Corporate Greed in Iraq. New York: Little, Brown and Company. See pages 68-69.
Scahill, Jeremy. (2007). Blackwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army. New York: Nation Books. See Chapter Seventeen: "Joseph Schmitz: Christian Soldier."

[edit] Links
NNDB Page [1].
Inspector General of the Department of Defense website [2].
BlackwaterUSA website [3].
"Politicization of Inspectors General" [4], a report released by Ranking Member Henry Waxman (D-CA) of the House Committee on Government Reform.
"US: Pentagon's Top Watchdog Resigned Amid Claims of Stonewalling Inquiries," T. Christian Miller, Los Angeles Times, September 3, 2005. [5]
"The Scrutinizer Finds Himself Under Scrutiny," T. Christian Miller, Los Angeles Times, September 25, 2005. [6]
"How Many More Mike Browns Are Out There?," Mark Thompson, Karen Tumulty, Time Magazine, October 3, 2005. [7]
"No FBI Charges for Defense Official in Iraq Case," T. Christian Miller, Los Angeles Times, October 15, 2005. [8]
"Tanker Inquiry Finds Rumsfeld's Attention Was Elsewhere," R. Jeffrey Smith, Washington Post, June 20, 2006. [9]
"Blackwater's Top Brass," The Pilot Online, Hampton Roads, Virginia, July 24, 2006. [10]
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_E._Schmitz"
Categories: United States Department of Defense officials | Lawyers
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: See Who's Editing Wikipedia

Postby jingofever » Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:18 pm

nomo wrote:Many more are simple copy edits, or additions to local town entries or school histories. One CIA entry deals with the details of lyrics sung in a Buffy the Vampire Slayer episode.


Just a simple copy edit or keyword hijacking discovered in the wild? But seriously folks, here is the scanner and here is Wired's page of discoveries. The scanner is being hit hard right now so it doesn't work. Nobody seems to have scanned any Scientology IPs yet.
User avatar
jingofever
 
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby theeKultleeder » Tue Aug 14, 2007 3:04 pm

A big problem that should've been foreseen. Damn. I like wikipedia.

You can't very well institute conflict of interest rules for anonymous users...
theeKultleeder
 

Postby Ziggin' and a Zaggin' » Wed Aug 15, 2007 3:13 pm

While reading the messages in the thread "To save America, we need another 9/11", I decided to follow a link to Wikipedia's entry for "Operation Mockingbird" (see Hugh Manatee Wins's message of August 10, 2007) and then its entry for "Project MK Ultra" (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKULTRA).

In the MK Ultra entry, it appears that wherever the text should be referring to "Ewen Cameron", it now reads either "Magnus Collins" or just "Magnus". There remains only one reference to "Ewen Cameron" in the whole page for MK Ultra. Quite strange.

What is going on at Wikipedia?
User avatar
Ziggin' and a Zaggin'
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 10:36 am
Location: The Great White North
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby jingofever » Wed Aug 15, 2007 3:29 pm

Seems that on 12 August someone with the IP address 71.239.243.29 vandalized it. I changed it back to Cameron. I wonder how long that will last. I figure it is just somebody having fun.
User avatar
jingofever
 
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Avalon » Wed Aug 15, 2007 10:52 pm

Well, at least the goods are still up about Beverly Russell.

She was spared the death penalty in a decision by her South Carolina jury, after her stepfather, Beverly Russell, a prominent Union County citizen, Republican Party and Christian Coalition leader, testified that he had sexually molested her when she was a teenager (until the intervention of the local Department of Social Services), and again in the months before the drowning of the two boys. Russell was never charged with a crime, despite the fact that he was accused in court of, and did not deny, the molestation and sexual abuse of his teenaged stepdaughter.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Smith
User avatar
Avalon
 
Posts: 1529
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 2:53 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby StarmanSkye » Fri Aug 17, 2007 7:16 pm

Update on sensitive topic edits traced to CIA and FBI computers:
Esp. relevant given that all gov. network protocols on gov. computer users require high echelon approval in advance. So these edits can hardly be the result of agency employees vandalizing entries on a lark -- these edits were planned, approved and effected for specific propaganda purposes.

Not that reasonably-astute folks haven't already had abundant reason to suspect the FIB and CIA weren't above faking public info.

Interesting this being reported by Reuters.
The topic revelation of Who, What, How and Why behind more notorious conflict-of-interest WIKI edits might make a very noteable book.

All the posts on this thread are important and useful in reading between-the-lines of specific interests behind covertly altering public opinion thru lies. I have to wonder how much more could have been found out in years ahead if the Wikiscanner were held as a closely guarded secret. As it is, the COI editers now will just take greater pains to hide their true originating/affiliated IDs.

As it is said: no call, no foul.
(NOT!!!)
Starman
*******

Title: CIA, FBI computers used for Wikipedia edits [Conflict of Interest: Iraq, Guantanamo Entries Altered]
Source: Reuters
URL Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/technolo ... 6020070816
? feedType=RSS&feedName=technology
Published: Aug 17, 2007
Author: Randall Mikkelsen
Ping List: *TerrorismCoverup*


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - People using CIA and FBI computers have edited entries in the online encyclopedia Wikipedia on topics including the Iraq war and the Guantanamo prison, according to a new tracing program.

The changes may violate Wikipedia's conflict-of-interest guidelines, a spokeswoman for the site said on Thursday.

The program, WikiScanner, was developed by Virgil Griffith of the Santa Fe Institute in New Mexico and posted this month on a Web site that was quickly overwhelmed with searches.

The program allows users to track the source of computers used to make changes to the popular Internet encyclopedia where anyone can submit and edit entries.

WikiScanner revealed that CIA computers were used to edit an entry on the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003. A graphic on casualties was edited to add that many figures were estimated and were not broken down by class.

Another entry on former CIA chief William Colby was edited by CIA computers to expand his career history and discuss the merits of a Vietnam War rural pacification program that he headed.

Aerial and satellite images of the U.S. prison for terrorism suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, were removed using a computer traced to the FBI, WikiScanner showed.

CIA spokesman George Little said he could not confirm whether CIA computers were used in the changes, adding that "the agency always expects its computer systems to be used responsibly."

The FBI did not have an immediate response.

Computers at numerous other organizations and companies were found to have been involved in editing articles related to them.

Griffith said he developed WikiScanner "to create minor public relations disasters for companies and organizations I dislike (and) to see what 'interesting organizations' (which I am neutral towards) are up to."

It was not known whether changes were made by an official representative of an agency or company, Griffith said, but it was certain the change was made by someone with access to the organization's network.

It violates Wikipedia's neutrality guidelines for a person with close ties to an issue to contribute to an entry about it, said spokeswoman Sandy Ordonez of the Wikimedia Foundation, Wikipedia's parent organization.

However, she said, "Wikipedia is self-correcting," meaning misleading entries can be quickly revised by another editor. She said Wikimedia welcomed the WikiScanner.

WikiScanner can be found at wikiscanner.virgil.gr/
StarmanSkye
 
Posts: 2670
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 11:32 pm
Location: State of Jefferson
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby theeKultleeder » Sat Aug 25, 2007 4:32 pm

[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:10_things_you_did_not_know_about_Wikipedia]You cannot actually change anything in Wikipedia...
…you can only add to it. Wikipedia is a database with an eternal memory. An article you read today is just the current draft; every time it is changed, we keep both the new version and a copy of the old version. This allows us to compare different versions, or restore older ones as needed. As a reader, you can even cite the specific copy of an article you are looking at. Just link to the article using the "Permanent link" at the bottom of the left menu, and your link will point to a page whose contents will never change. (However, if an article is deleted, you cannot view a permanent link to it unless you are an administrator.)
More information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki[/url]

#4 of 10 Things You Don't Know About Wikipedia. The significance is that we can track what changes are made, and speculate from there.
theeKultleeder
 

Wiki Franklin

Postby Project Willow » Sat Aug 25, 2007 5:00 pm

Someone want to work on the Franklin Case page?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_Coverup_Hoax

There's no entry for "Franklin Case", or "Franklin Cover-Up", just "Franklin Cover-Up Hoax" and that's just the start.

[/url]
User avatar
Project Willow
 
Posts: 4793
Joined: Sat May 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Seattle
Blog: View Blog (1)

Re: See Who's Editing Wikipedia

Postby elfismiles » Wed Sep 02, 2015 11:43 am

I feel certain there was another thread around here that dealt with the various scams and wars going on within Wikipedia but ...

Wikipedia rocked by 'rogue editors' blackmail scam targeting small businesses and celebrities
Exclusive: Website takes action against 'co-ordinated group' of fraudsters
Jamie Merrill Author Biography , Jonathan Owen
Wednesday 02 September 2015
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/cr ... 81993.html
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8511
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: See Who's Editing Wikipedia

Postby 82_28 » Wed Sep 02, 2015 1:47 pm

I must admit that we screwed around with facebook just to see how quickly it was deleted or noticed on wikipedia. We would have them and others acquire our fake company. Great fun! But it also shows the Achilles heel. We were stress testing! I think Early Clues, LLC was "officially" acquired for three days or so.
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: See Who's Editing Wikipedia

Postby stillrobertpaulsen » Tue Sep 08, 2015 7:10 pm

These are a great series of articles regarding Wikipedia and their contributions in JFK assassination studies:

Will the Real Wikipedia Please Stand Up?

Part 1
Part 2
Addendum
Part 3
"Huey Long once said, “Fascism will come to America in the name of anti-fascism.” I'm afraid, based on my own experience, that fascism will come to America in the name of national security."
-Jim Garrison 1967
User avatar
stillrobertpaulsen
 
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:43 pm
Location: California
Blog: View Blog (37)

Re: See Who's Editing Wikipedia

Postby Joao » Tue Sep 08, 2015 9:16 pm

stillrobertpaulsen » Tue Sep 08, 2015 3:10 pm wrote:These are a great series of articles regarding Wikipedia and their contributions in JFK assassination studies:

Will the Real Wikipedia Please Stand Up?

Part 1
Part 2
Addendum
Part 3

Fascinating topic; Is there a simple overview of which you're aware, or could you (kindly) point out some key passages? Pain in the ass, I know--just thought I'd ask. Thanks.
Joao
 
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2013 11:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests