mentalgongfu2 wrote:So you believe a different kind of jet fuel and atmospheric changes are responsible for persistent contrails / chemtrails, and we won't be able to use ground based telescopes by 2050
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4755996.stmGround-based astronomy could be impossible in 40 years because of pollution from aircraft exhaust trails and climate change, an expert says.mentalgongfu2 wrote:but we shouldn't waste our time concerning ourself with this phenomena because it is an energy sink and full of disinfo?
Yes. Unless you wanna join the list wackos I've unfortunately run across that became obsessed and suggested shooting down planes or some such lunatic behavior.
YOU tell ME what can be done about the Aircraft Industry? And when you're ready for the real curveball, go look into artificial cirrus' role in global cooling. The reality is the fucking junk up there is the only thing preventing the runaway warming scenario Jeff posted this morning. In some parts of the Earth, pollution particulates drop the Sun's light by up to 10 percent. Is it not a source of disgust for you that pollution is something that's keeping you alive? Ground the planes and that barrier won't last long. But this is redundant, as I imagine even planes won't be able to afford gas much longer, so......mentalgongfu2 wrote:and do you discount the reports from honest witnesses who see what they consider unusual aerial activity associated with the clouding effect that you too say you have observed and studied?
I discount nothing. I interpret the same data they do in a different way.
Clearly this is a problem for you, but I've tried to be as friendly and liberal in my explanation for my rationale backing it up with solid science.
If you're still irked by it, I don't know what to tell you, dude.
The World's fucked.
Ever buy a plane ticket or fill a car's gas engine?