Lord Balto wrote:Joe Hillshoist wrote:monster wrote:Joe Hillshoist wrote:I don't normally go in for bible verses but this one seems appropriate somehow. I'm not a Christian, and I dunno if thats what the writer was referring to, only the writer does really, but its still interesting.
That's the first thing I think of, too. There's a lot of BS in the bible, but since Genesis was based on older Egyptian myths, maybe there's some truth to it.
I'd bet there's a code in the bible that we haven't cracked yet.
Probably.
And in a few other "sacred' writings too.
In fact if you had a powerful enough computer you could probably find one just about any text, but I'd imagine it'd need to be a very powerful computer, something that made Deep Thought, and it creation, Earth, look like 80s amigas.The reader deserves an explanation at this point, for we have obviously massaged the data in a manner not unlike that used by the great M. Baillie, which earned him and others the not so flattering title of calculators. I will make no apologies here. Baillie was essentially right and everyone else was, and is still, wrong. The following is basically a mathematical extension of our previous discovery of the application of an, amazingly, unnoticed multiplication of the biblical timeline by a factor of 2. I noticed the first clue to this pattern when I looked at the age of Terah when he died at Haran before the departure of Abraham. There is no way he could have been 102 if he was born in 1600 and Abraham left Haran in 1528. No matter what scale one uses, we are still looking at a mathematical impossibility. Fairly obviously, the age at Terah's death must have been multiplied here by 3 rather than 2. What positively shocked me was that all of the peculiar ages and periods encountered in the chapters before Abraham could be explained by the introduction of succeedingly larger multiplications by even divisors of the number 12, just another indication of a sexagesimally oriented Mesopotamian hand in this little mathematical puzzle.
The early books of the bible are not the only places where king-lists have been artificially extended by factors derived from the base-60 numbering system. An analogous process occurred with the early "mythical" dynasties of Mesopotamia, though the factors there are much larger, 1200 and 60, so that these dynasties appear even more mythological than those of the bible. They do, however, underscore the resort to a sliding time scale where early Middle Eastern records are concerned, serving to confirm our own interpretation of the absurdly long lifespans of the Hebrew patriarchs, as well as the smaller, though no less anomalous, expansions of the overall timeline. The following should clarify what is going on, chronologically, in the bible without necessarily explaining exactly why its authors went to so much trouble to obscure the true dimensions of the history presented there. That, however, is a matter of some import, for it serves as a key to determining which chronological documents are genuine and which are forgeries, rationalizations, or simply wishful thinking. The nature of this key is cryptographic, or kabbalistic, to use a Medieval term.
http://neros.lordbalto.com/ChapterSix.htm
The chronological factors serve another purpose. They fill up an approximately 1200 year gap between Noah (Menes) and Ham (Hammurabi). Otherwise, you would have a creation myth that ends with the first king of United Egypt, followed by a temporal history that doesn't begin until the 1st Dynasty of Babylon. Which would look kind of peculiar coming from an omnipotent god-type character.
I caught on to this pattern myself a long time ago. I have tried to unravel the code, but mostly with frustration. It does exist, and I think the multiplication factor changes with time.
--------------------------------------------------
This shed a little bit of light on it for me, as it helped me visualize the secret code that is being used. For those of you that have never seen the Bible Wheel, it will really open your eyes if you understand what you are looking at. It didn't give me all the answers I seek, but it helped me visualize the possible process involved.
(THE BIBLE WHEEL is a simple and direct geometric representation of the Holy Bible. It reveals the supernatural structure of the Christian Canon by displaying the intrinsic geometric integration of the sixty-six books amongst themselves and with the twenty-two letters of the Hebrew alphabet. A full introduction to the Bible Wheel taken from the first chapter of the book is now posted in the book section. It is called Chapter 1: The Genesis of the Bible Wheel)
http://www.biblewheel.com/Wheel/wheel.asp
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Napier's Bones, somehow also fits this calculus, (maybe), i'm not sure. The books of the Bible, when wrapped around a drum with 22 spokes that are separated properly, orient themselves to the proper 22 books of the Torah. There is a zig zag patterned grid, as if a string were wound around a cylinder at an angle, that legend says is the proper numerical grid to place the numbers in that is the codex. Napiers Bones resemble this zig zag grid, and in its arrangement, I can see patterns that I know are signifigant to the puzzle.
Monster is the RI math wizard, what say ye Monster? Any clues? Put some Monster brain on it for us...
