infant consciousness superior to adults

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

infant consciousness superior to adults

Postby Jeff » Thu May 14, 2009 7:59 am

Inside the baby mind
It's unfocused, random, and extremely good at what it does. How we can learn from a baby's brain.

By Jonah Lehrer
April 26, 2009

WHAT IS IT like to be a baby? For centuries, this question would have seemed absurd: behind that adorable facade was a mostly empty head. A baby, after all, is missing most of the capabilities that define the human mind, such as language and the ability to reason. Rene Descartes argued that the young child was entirely bound by sensation, hopelessly trapped in the confusing rush of the here and now. A newborn, in this sense, is just a lump of need, a bundle of reflexes that can only eat and cry. To think like a baby is to not think at all.

Modern science has largely agreed, spending decades outlining all the things that babies couldn't do because their brains had yet to develop. They were unable to focus, delay gratification, or even express their desires. The Princeton philosopher Peter Singer famously suggested that "killing a disabled infant is not morally equivalent to killing a person. Very often it is not wrong at all."

Now, however, scientists have begun to dramatically revise their concept of a baby's mind. By using new research techniques and tools, they've revealed that the baby brain is abuzz with activity, capable of learning astonishing amounts of information in a relatively short time. Unlike the adult mind, which restricts itself to a narrow slice of reality, babies can take in a much wider spectrum of sensation - they are, in an important sense, more aware of the world than we are.

This hyperawareness comes with several benefits. For starters, it allows young children to figure out the world at an incredibly fast pace. Although babies are born utterly helpless, within a few years they've mastered everything from language - a toddler learns 10 new words every day - to complex motor skills such as walking. According to this new view of the baby brain, many of the mental traits that used to seem like developmental shortcomings, such as infants' inability to focus their attention, are actually crucial assets in the learning process.

In fact, in some situations it might actually be better for adults to regress into a newborn state of mind. While maturity has its perks, it can also inhibit creativity and lead people to fixate on the wrong facts. When we need to sort through a lot of seemingly irrelevant information or create something completely new, thinking like a baby is our best option.

"We've had this very misleading view of babies," says Alison Gopnik, a psychologist at the University of California, Berkeley, and author of the forthcoming book, "The Philosophical Baby." "The baby brain is perfectly designed for what it needs to do, which is learn about the world. There are times when having a fully developed brain can almost seem like an impediment."

One of the most surprising implications of this new research concerns baby consciousness, or what babies actually experience as they interact with the outside world. While scientists and doctors have traditionally assumed that babies are much less conscious than adults - this is why, until the 1970s, many infants underwent surgery without anesthesia - that view is being overturned. Gopnik argues that, in many respects, babies are more conscious than adults. She compares the experience of being a baby with that of watching a riveting movie, or being a tourist in a foreign city, where even the most mundane activities seem new and exciting. "For a baby, every day is like going to Paris for the first time," Gopnik says. "Just go for a walk with a 2-year-old. You'll quickly realize that they're seeing things you don't even notice."

There's something slightly paradoxical about trying to study the inner life of babies. For starters, you can't ask them questions. Young children can't describe their sensations or justify their emotions; they can't articulate the pleasure of a pacifier or explain the comfort of a stuffed animal. And, of course, none of us have any memories of infancy. For a scientist, the baby mind can seem like an impenetrable black box.

In recent years, however, scientists have developed new methods for entering the head of a baby. They've looked at the density of brain tissue, analyzed the development of neural connections, and tracked the eye movements of infants. By comparing the anatomy of the baby brain with the adult brain, scientists can make inferences about infant experience.

These new research techniques have uncovered several surprising findings. It turns out that the baby brain actually contains more brain cells, or neurons, than the adult brain: The instant we open our eyes, our neurons start the "pruning process," which involves the elimination of seemingly unnecessary neural connections. Furthermore, the distinct parts of the baby cortex - the center of sensation and higher thought - are better connected than the adult cortex, with more links between disparate regions. These anatomical differences aren't simply a sign of immaturity: They're an important tool that provides babies with the ability to assimilate vast amounts of information with ease.

While the pruning process makes the brain more efficient, it can also narrow our thoughts and make learning more difficult, as we become less able to adjust to new circumstances and absorb new ideas. In a sense, there's a direct trade-off between the mind's flexibility and its proficiency. As Gopnik notes, this helps explain why a young child can learn three languages at once but nevertheless struggle to tie his shoelaces.

But the newborn brain isn't just denser and more malleable: it's also constructed differently, with far fewer inhibitory neurotransmitters, which are the chemicals that prevent neurons from firing. This suggests that the infant mind is actually more crowded with fleeting thoughts and stray sensations than the adult mind. While adults automatically block out irrelevant information, such as the hum of an air conditioner or the conversation of nearby strangers, babies take everything in: their reality arrives without a filter. As a result, it typically takes significantly higher concentrations of anesthesia to render babies unconscious, since there's more cellular activity to silence.

The hyperabundance of thoughts in the baby brain also reflects profound differences in the ways adults and babies pay attention to the world. If attention works like a narrow spotlight in adults - a focused beam illuminating particular parts of reality - then in young kids it works more like a lantern, casting a diffuse radiance on their surroundings.

"We sometimes say that adults are better at paying attention than children," writes Gopnik. "But really we mean just the opposite. Adults are better at not paying attention. They're better at screening out everything else and restricting their consciousness to a single focus."

Consider, for instance, what happens when preschoolers are shown a photograph of someone - let's call her Jane - looking at a picture of a family. When the young children are asked questions about what Jane is paying attention to, the kids quickly agree that Jane is thinking about the people in the picture. But they also insist that she's thinking about the picture frame, and the wall behind the picture, and the chair lurking in her peripheral vision. In other words, they believe that Jane is attending to whatever she can see.

While this less focused form of attention makes it more difficult to stay on task - preschoolers are easily distracted - it also comes with certain advantages. In many circumstances, the lantern mode of attention can actually lead to improvements in memory, especially when it comes to recalling information that seemed incidental at the time.

Consider this memory task designed by John Hagen, a developmental psychologist at the University of Michigan. A child is given a deck of cards and shown two cards at a time. The child is told to remember the card on the right and to ignore the card on the left. Not surprisingly, older children and adults are much better at remembering the cards they were told to focus on, since they're able to direct their attention. However, young children are often better at remembering the cards on the left, which they were supposed to ignore. The lantern casts its light everywhere.

"Adults can follow directions and focus, and that's great," says John Colombo, a psychologist at the University of Kansas. "But children, it turns out, are much better at picking up on all the extraneous stuff that's going on. . . . And this makes sense: If you don't know how the world works, then how do you know what to focus on? You should try to take everything in."

While thinking like an adult is necessary when we need to focus, or when we already know which information is relevant, many situations aren't so clear-cut. In these instances, paying strict attention is actually a liability, since it leads us to neglect potentially important pieces of the puzzle. That's when it helps to think like a baby.

This new understanding of baby cognition, and the peculiar ways in which babies pay attention, is also giving scientists insights into improving the mental functioning of adults. The ability to direct attention, it turns out, doesn't merely inhibit irrelevant facts and perceptions - it can also stifle the imagination. Sometimes, the mind performs best when we don't try to control it.

The differences in how babies and adults pay attention are primarily caused by the unformed nature of the prefrontal cortex, a brain area just behind the eyes. While the prefrontal cortex has been greatly enlarged during human evolution - it's responsible for a wide variety of cognitive abilities, from directed attention to abstract thought - it's also the last brain area to fully develop, and often isn't done developing until late adolescence.

Although scientists have long held the lack of a functional prefrontal cortex responsible for all sorts of "childish" behaviors, researchers are beginning to realize that, sometimes, it might actually be better to allow the prefrontal cortex to loosen its grip.

A recent brain scanning experiment by researchers at Johns Hopkins University found that jazz musicians in the midst of improvisation - they were playing a specially designed keyboard in a brain scanner - showed dramatically reduced activity in the prefrontal cortex. It was only by "deactivating" this brain area that the musicians were able to spontaneously invent new melodies. The scientists compare this unwound state of mind with that of dreaming during REM sleep, meditation, and other creative pursuits, such as the composition of poetry. But it also resembles the thought process of a young child, albeit one with musical talent. Baudelaire was right: "Genius is nothing more nor less than childhood recovered at will."

The immaturity of the baby brain comes with another advantage: utter absorption in the moment. The best evidence for this comes from brain scans of adult subjects as they watched an engrossing Clint Eastwood movie. The experiment, led by Rafael Malach at Hebrew University, found that when adults were watching the film their brains showed a peculiar pattern of activity, as their prefrontal areas were suppressed. At the same time, areas in the back of the brain associated with visual perception were turned on. As Gopnik notes, this mental state - the experience of being captivated by entertainment - is, in many respects, a fleeting reminder of what it feels like to be a young child. "You are incredibly aware of what's happening - your experiences are very vivid - and yet you're not self-conscious at all," she says. "You're not thinking about anything but what's on the screen."

But it's not just the movie theater that transports us back to a newborn state of mind, in which we're fully immersed in the moment. Gopnik notes that a number of other situations, from Zen meditation to the experience of natural beauty, can also lead to states of awareness so intense that the self seems to disappear. "This is the same ecstatic feeling that the Romantic poets were always writing about," she says. "It's seeing the world in a grain of sand."

If people could never regress into this babylike consciousness, then we'd struggle with the kind of tasks that require us to stop being self-conscious and lose ourselves in the job. Such moments are often described as "flow" activities, and can occur whenever we're completely captivated by what we're doing, be it stirring a risotto or solving a crossword puzzle. The Zen Master Shunryu Suzuki referred to such modes as "beginner's mind," since people are able to think like a baby, open to possibility and free of errant preconceptions.

Gopnik has discovered for herself the advantages of being able to shift between a babyesque form of cognition and a more adult frame of mind. "As a scientist, you really need to use both kinds of thinking," she says. "Sometimes you need to focus and analyze your data. But you also need the ability to be open and creative, to think in a new way if the old way isn't working."

At such moments, she suggests, we need to think with the innocence of an infant - to release the reins of attention and look anew at a world we're still trying to understand.

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas ... ?page=full
User avatar
Jeff
Site Admin
 
Posts: 11134
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2000 8:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Fixx » Thu May 14, 2009 9:00 am

How's this for coincidence. I was sat in the Special Care Baby Unit three hours ago with my new daughter, Isobella, in my arms, discussing something very similar to this with her mother. Her brain is a sponge for new sensations and experiences, even at this early stage (3 days) and whilst I am not into 'power' teaching my child, I do intend to include 'factual' information in amongst the 'baby' talk, simple things like the 10 times table etc., the ABC song, and 'I can sing a rainbow', for three reasons, the sound of my voice will soothe her (hopefully), some of it may 'stick' to make learning easier later on, and it gives me something to say without having to make stuff up, a lot easier at 3am I think.
Fixx
 
Posts: 190
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 7:04 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby barracuda » Thu May 14, 2009 11:02 am

Congratulations, Fixx!

Word of the day - babyesque.
The most dangerous traps are the ones you set for yourself. - Phillip Marlowe
User avatar
barracuda
 
Posts: 12890
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 5:58 pm
Location: Niles, California
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Luposapien » Thu May 14, 2009 12:45 pm

Congratulations Fixx! Best wishes to your family for health and happiness. My oldest just turned 5, and her little sister will be 1 next week. I don't know where the time has gone, but it's nowhere to be found here.

Re the OP: This seems like something that should be pretty self-evident, at least to anyone who has young children, or spends any amount of time with them. Kids have always struck me as being more hyper-aware than unaware.

Also not surprised regarding the study with improvising musicians. I can never perform at my peak if I'm having to actively think about what it is I'm playing. I assume this holds true for pretty much any activity that requires you to process the incoming signals and react on the fly (sports of any kind, I would guess). I suspect this ties in with the kinds of abilities that savants express.

Interesting tie-ins with spiritual practices involving meditation, or trying to still the analytical mind and bring oneself into the present moment. Reminds me of:

Jesus wrote:Verily I say unto you, Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven.


Something I was not aware of:
While scientists and doctors have traditionally assumed that babies are much less conscious than adults - this is why, until the 1970s, many infants underwent surgery without anesthesia - that view is being overturned.
:shock:
If you can't laugh at yourself, then everyone else will.
User avatar
Luposapien
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 2:24 pm
Location: Approximately Austin
Blog: View Blog (0)

Duh

Postby alwyn » Thu May 14, 2009 2:32 pm

If you are aware at all, and have had a child, this would be self evident.

BTW, in 1997, my son needed dental work done. This was at UCSF med center. They ground down his front teeth without anesthetic, over my protests, because they said he didn't feel it. He was just crying because he was 'scared'. I never took him back. So watch out, the medical neanderthals are still out there, protect your children from them.
question authority?
alwyn
 
Posts: 771
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 7:25 pm
Location: Laytonville
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Duh

Postby OP ED » Thu May 14, 2009 2:37 pm

O/T:

alwyn wrote:If you are aware at all, and have had a child, this would be self evident.

BTW, in 1997, my son needed dental work done. This was at UCSF med center. They ground down his front teeth without anesthetic, over my protests, because they said he didn't feel it. He was just crying because he was 'scared'. I never took him back. So watch out, the medical neanderthals are still out there, protect your children from them.




see Jeff's other thread
http://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board/v ... hp?t=23865

for a couple of the reasons why it is impolite to call people like these Dentist hacks "Neanderthals".
User avatar
OP ED
 
Posts: 4673
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:04 pm
Location: Detroit
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Penguin » Thu May 14, 2009 3:08 pm

Heheh, yeah.
I wholeheartedly agree - having worked in daycare once upon a time, with 3-7 year olds. They were positively tripping much of the time with all the new stuff..

And one friends kid with huge eyes, wondering about everything and I bet stuff we didnt see anymore, while hanging onto his beard contently..
Penguin
 
Posts: 5089
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby MacCruiskeen » Thu May 14, 2009 3:21 pm

Here's an earlier RI thread, "on childhood as a Fortean experience" - at a slight tangent, because it's about small children rather than actual infants:

The strangeness of early childhood

The thread went a bit astray at times, but the Rilke quote in the OP literally made my hair stand on end when I first read it; because I knew and quite intensely remembered those experiences, essentially the same as his, but different in detail, inevitably, and never properly described or evoked (by me).
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: infant consciousness superior to adults

Postby genericsyncretic » Thu May 14, 2009 3:25 pm

Speaking for the childless here, it's still pretty obvious to anyone who pays attention. My wife and I were talking about this concept just the other night. One of those great "what ifs", since it's still impossible to know how a different being actually perceives the world. Still, it's better to see research to back it up like this, it keeps one from coming off all new-agey bringing up the idea.

I can definitely understand this;
Jeff wrote:[b].

A recent brain scanning experiment by researchers at Johns Hopkins University found that jazz musicians in the midst of improvisation - they were playing a specially designed keyboard in a brain scanner - showed dramatically reduced activity in the prefrontal cortex. It was only by "deactivating" this brain area that the musicians were able to spontaneously invent new melodies. The scientists compare this unwound state of mind with that of dreaming during REM sleep, meditation, and other creative pursuits, such as the composition of poetry.


Having started playing music live somewhat late in life. There's a certain mindset you really need to "get into" for it to flow smoothly and sound natural. On the somewhat less noble side a moderate amount of alcohol/thc seems to open up those pathways in the mind. I wonder if it's similar. Perhaps reducing pre-frontal cortex activity? Of course meditation or some kind of self training would seem preferable since that's not something that can be overdone. As far as I know.
genericsyncretic
 
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 2:08 am
Location: Providence, RI
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Penguin » Thu May 14, 2009 3:29 pm

Ive had lots of childhood flashbacks, to pretty early ages, earliest from a lil over a year old. I kind of mean like feeling like being there and that person again, with the present taking a rear seat kind of..

Theyre sometimes triggered by a smell, sound, music, or high fever - I have one indescribable feeling that I had very young in a high fever, and I tend to get that same thing sometimes when Im sick and tired, fleeting between waking and sleep.

Seeing the places you grew up in also triggers memories...
And then there are the "dream places" - dreams where you remember youve been in the same dreamplace before, sometimes as a kid, sometimes more recently.

I had a shared dream / precog / dejavu with my brother when I was 6 and he 3 - he remembers dreaming of a situation the night before, I got a deja vu when it happened and I still recall that moment clearly - my brother remembers both the dream and the moment it happened for real.
When working at the daycare, two kids also described sharing a dream to me after the daytime nap. Boy and a girl. They were both 4 then. They slept next to each other for the hour - both described waking up in the dream, in the same room, and then playing together. They also mentioned some of the things theyd done. Their eyes shone and they were laughing as they explained this to me - I was getting them dressed to go outside. Made sure to tell them it is a great thing to see dreams together ;)
Penguin
 
Posts: 5089
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby bks » Thu May 14, 2009 4:53 pm

Cheerios-pissing to follow.

I can see the bit about babies being hyper-absorbent (who couldn't?). There no news there. But this article risk a foolish valorizing of an infant's completely natural approach to the world, and it's also a fairly bald promotion for Gopnik's silly-sounding book (the title is just wrong). What, really, have we learned here?

The immaturity of the baby brain comes with another advantage: utter absorption in the moment. The best evidence for this comes from brain scans of adult subjects as they watched an engrossing Clint Eastwood movie. The experiment, led by Rafael Malach at Hebrew University , found that when adults were watching the film their brains showed a peculiar pattern of activity, as their prefrontal areas were suppressed. At the same time, areas in the back of the brain associated with visual perception were turned on. As Gopnik notes, this mental state - the experience of being captivated by entertainment - is, in many respects, a fleeting reminder of what it feels like to be a young child. "You are incredibly aware of what's happening - your experiences are very vivid - and yet you're not self-conscious at all," she says. "You're not thinking about anything but what's on the screen."


From the perspective of a baby, yes, having this quality to one's experience sounds like an advantage most of the time. But it's hardly an unmitigated blessing. And an attitude of complete absorption makes philosophy or any type of critical thought impossible.

First of all, no baby is "incredibly aware of what's happening". They are merely hyper-responsive to their environments. They don't know the most basic things required for true awareness - they don't know a movie is a movie, for instance. They lack all context. Adult human beings bounce back and forth between the 'first attitude' of absorption in media and the 'second attitude' of critical distance from what they are observing. It's the second attitude, the attitude that children and babies lack, which makes it possible to resist what we are being exposed to.

more on this at: http://www.transparencynow.com/trusig.htm

Now it could be that movie-watching is just a bad metaphor for what babies are actually experiencing.
bks
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:44 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Nordic » Thu May 14, 2009 5:02 pm

My son, who is now six, I swear is clairvoyant sometimes.

Seems he was, too, even more, when he was younger.

And he used to describe his last lifetime to us. Now he says he was making it all up, "tricking" us. But I sure don't know how he could have come up with the stuff he came up with. Names, specific details that I honestly don't know how he could have even heard of.

I used to know a girl who, when she was about three, could describe auras around people. Different people had different colored auras. She also talked about her past lives.

I've had some powerful clairvoyant experiences in my life, too, although it's something I can't control at all. I can't turn it on and off. (wish I could!) And supposedly this sort of thing runs in families.
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Postby Penguin » Thu May 14, 2009 5:04 pm

bks wrote:First of all, no baby is "incredibly aware of what's happening". They are merely hyper-responsive to their environments. They don't know the most basic things required for true awareness - they don't know a movie is a movie, for instance. They lack all context. Adult human beings bounce back and forth between the 'first attitude' of absorption in media and the 'second attitude' of critical distance from what they are observing. It's the second attitude, the attitude that children and babies lack, which makes it possible to resist what we are being exposed to.


Yeah, the mind is in the mode of building itself up by experience...
So its really another mind than the one that one has after growing up for a lil longer. Chicken and egg kind of thing?

Whats a word for when a word is not?

I can't control at all. I can't turn it on and off. (wish I could!)

^^
Last edited by Penguin on Thu May 14, 2009 5:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Penguin
 
Posts: 5089
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby MacCruiskeen » Thu May 14, 2009 5:42 pm

Penguin wrote: They don't know the most basic things required for true awareness - they don't know a movie is a movie, for instance.


What hopelessly naive little bastards! Babies are like totally uncool.

But please note: Nor do babies believe that a movie is not a movie. Nor do they care in the slightest. I think that's one of the main points of the article.

Nor is it necessarily an inevitability that infants are exposed to movies in the first place, except possibly in the USA and the UK. And, as is easily verifiable, many more adults than infants confuse movies (and TV shows) with real life. In 2009, maturity consists precisely in doing so, dependably.

It is weird, and very striking, how every discussion of perception - and of childhood (and of adulthood, and of politics, and of life) - now almost immediately devolves into a discussion of movies. It must mean something. Truly sophisticated Western adults no longer trust or even register their own perceptions until they've been bought, processed and sold back to them by Hollywood. Then those proto-perceptions can at last be registered and perceived, just as a Starbucks coffee-variety can be perceived, selected and drunk only when the Starbucks cafe exists in which to find it and "choose" it. Apart from not crying when unhappy, this is the main thing thing that distinguishes adults from babies.

Mature human beings don't cry when unhappy; they soldier on regardless. Babies are, therefore, assholes. Crybabies, in fact.

Grow up, babies! Get real! Act your age, you commie bastards!! D'you think the world owes you a living??!?
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Penguin » Thu May 14, 2009 5:54 pm

Except I didnt say that :p
Penguin
 
Posts: 5089
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests