RI lost an asset when Alice stopped posting.
Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
JackRiddler » Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:46 am wrote:.
The Piper article is among the most blatant uses of "find-the-Jew" technique I've ever seen posted here. All actors in the play fall away as inconsequential, only the ones who can be identified as Jews or somehow "Zionist" have agency. The narrative is already written in advance: if an Israeli interest can be found or fabricated, then that necessarily and always was what it was about. It mutilates the well-established evidentiary history of the 1963 coup d'etat by the CIA and the generals. It's a perfect example of "big tent" or let's give equal credence to "alternatives" regardless of the evidence, with the result that the stink of insane "conspiracy theory" falls on any attempt to say anything about the coup, other than official story.
Above I posted John Judge's one major contribution to the RI board:
http://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/ ... 1#pr414728
barracuda » Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:21 pm wrote:Michael Collins Piper wrote:Please note of the 22 Warren Commission staff attorneys, fully nine of them were Jewish. Another was married to a Jewish woman. Additionally, several others had known, intimate connections to the Israeli lobby in America.
Is this the same Michael Collins Piper who's a columnist for David Duke's website, as well as Willis Carto's American Free Press?
Why yes, I believe it is.
JackRiddler » Sat Nov 23, 2019 12:51 pm wrote:I think so sometimes, but definitely not for that aspect of her work here.JackRiddler » Thu Jul 21, 2011 10:46 am wrote:.
The Piper article is among the most blatant uses of "find-the-Jew" technique I've ever seen posted here. All actors in the play fall away as inconsequential, only the ones who can be identified as Jews or somehow "Zionist" have agency. The narrative is already written in advance: if an Israeli interest can be found or fabricated, then that necessarily and always was what it was about. It mutilates the well-established evidentiary history of the 1963 coup d'etat by the CIA and the generals. It's a perfect example of "big tent" or let's give equal credence to "alternatives" regardless of the evidence, with the result that the stink of insane "conspiracy theory" falls on any attempt to say anything about the coup, other than official story.
Above I posted John Judge's one major contribution to the RI board:
http://www.rigorousintuition.ca/board2/ ... 1#pr414728barracuda » Wed Jul 20, 2011 10:21 pm wrote:Michael Collins Piper wrote:Please note of the 22 Warren Commission staff attorneys, fully nine of them were Jewish. Another was married to a Jewish woman. Additionally, several others had known, intimate connections to the Israeli lobby in America.
Is this the same Michael Collins Piper who's a columnist for David Duke's website, as well as Willis Carto's American Free Press?
Why yes, I believe it is.
PufPuf93 » Sat Nov 23, 2019 11:18 am wrote:
I do not recall how many days we were off school but was watching the TV (3 channels then, no cable) when Oswald as shot by Rudy. All quite confusing for a young person who had yet tp question much.
RocketMan » Fri Nov 22, 2019 5:21 pm wrote:I just watched JFK again after a long time. It is really quite shocking how well it holds up. Garrison's/Costner/Stone's courtroom speech in the finale is an incredibly powerful piece of oratory, and in retrospect, completely trailblazing in 1991. Unreal listening to the US covert operations apparatus so directly and unashamedly dragged in a major motion picture released by Warner Brothers...
thrulookingglass » Tue Nov 26, 2019 12:34 am wrote:That little debauched party they had, admittedly not as bad as their 'day job', actually happened. There's pictures of Ferrie dressed up as some Hermes/Icarus like costume, amyl nitrate, the whole deal. I've heard critics poo-poo Oliver's brave film making in regards to JFK, but there's not much embellished in the entire picture. I tell you one thing, there's not many times I stay dry eyed during any repeated viewing of Oliver's masterpiece. I can't think of anyone so bold as to show US soldiers raping Vietnamese children such as he did in Platoon either. Shows you what war is good for.
thrulookingglass » Sat Jan 25, 2020 11:36 pm wrote:
Thought this was hilarious. Enjoy.
Cordelia » Mon Nov 25, 2019 2:01 pm wrote:Kennedy's funeral was held 56 years ago today, the National Day of Mourning. Pretty incredible, 48 hours to plan a State Funeral and also to bring so many dignitaries from all over the world. Ironic, too, implementing security and protection for foreign heads-of-state (including French President de Gaulle, himself no stranger to an assassination attempt) on such short term notice by a country that couldn’t/didn't even protect its own leader.
^^^Openly walking down main avenues?PufPuf93 » Sat Nov 23, 2019 11:18 am wrote:
I do not recall how many days we were off school but was watching the TV (3 channels then, no cable) when Oswald as shot by Rudy. All quite confusing for a young person who had yet tp question much.
It was all a HUGE event wasn’t it? I remember being released from school early on Friday, a classmate who laughed at the news, the long walk home, being glued to the t.v. while drawing pictures of Mrs. Kennedy, her children, the casket, horses, etc..., everybody shouting in disbelief when Oswald was shot. I also remember my father taking me, my brother and my dad’s friend, who drove some distance, to view the casket in the Capitol Rotunda. My father had met Kennedy before and after the election through his job, had been Jacqueline Kennedy’s assigned “dinner partner” at a pre-election formal dinner party and once took my brother (why not me too?) to meet Kennedy in the Oval Office. He gave me a commemorative book on those four days (one that heavily promoted the Oswald-as-shooter legend, published not long after the assassination), and showed me a long-shot picture of the funeral procession, with himself in view, standing with his hand over his heart as the funeral caisson moved past the Capitol Building.RocketMan » Fri Nov 22, 2019 5:21 pm wrote:I just watched JFK again after a long time. It is really quite shocking how well it holds up. Garrison's/Costner/Stone's courtroom speech in the finale is an incredibly powerful piece of oratory, and in retrospect, completely trailblazing in 1991. Unreal listening to the US covert operations apparatus so directly and unashamedly dragged in a major motion picture released by Warner Brothers...
I agree; and Kevin Costner really showed his acting chops (esp. the courtroom closing argument). The film’s near perfect imho. No scene wasn’t riveting, though the circa 1700’s debauched costume party scene was pretty over-the-top (but entertaining) and best left for future ‘deleted scenes’ viewing. Where did that idea even come from--was Stone inspired by this photo, purportedly of Clay Shaw?
Clay Shaw at Mardi Gras in the early 1950s, outside Dixie’s Hall of Music. (Photo credit: Jack Robinson Photo, The Jack Robinson Archive, LLC)
https://gonola.com/lgbt-new-orleans/gui ... -clay-shaw
Edward Curtin
President John F. Kennedy: His Life and Public Assassination
ejcurtin
November 22, 2021
The following article on the life of President John F. Kennedy, and his assassination on this date, November 22, 1963, is the lead piece in the eighth issue of Garrison: The Journal of History and Deep Politics that has just been published: “The Political Assassinations of the 1960s.” From JFK, RFK, MLK, and Malcolm X, to Hammarskjold and Lumumba, the 1960s were a tragic period when the CIA took over the United States and profoundly changed the course of history, and Garrison is indispensable for understanding that history and its importance for today. This issue is double-sized (348 pages), a book really. If you like the following article, please support and purchase Garrison.
Despite a treasure trove of new research and information having emerged over the last fifty-eight years, there are many people who still think who killed President John Fitzgerald Kennedy and why are unanswerable questions. They have drunk what Dr. Martin Schotz has called “the waters of uncertainty” that results “in a state of confusion in which anything can be believed but nothing can be known, nothing of significance that is.”[1]
Then there are others who cling to the Lee Harvey Oswald “lone-nut” explanation proffered by the Warren Commission.
Both these groups tend to agree, however, that whatever the truth, unknowable or allegedly known, it has no contemporary relevance but is old-hat, ancient history, stuff for conspiracy-obsessed people with nothing better to do. The general thinking is that the assassination occurred more than a half-century ago, so let’s move on.
Nothing could be further from the truth, for the assassination of JFK is the foundational event of modern American history, the Pandora’s box from which many decades of tragedy have sprung...
continues... http://edwardcurtin.com/president-john- ... ssination/
The REAL Anthony Fauci with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Odysee link - https://odysee.com/@corbettreport:0/rfkjr-fauci720p:e
(1:03:12 min)
The Corbett Report Official LBRY Channel
November 19th, 2021
SHOW NOTES AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/fauci/
Joining us today to talk about his new bestselling book, The Real Anthony Fauci, is Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. of ChildrensHealthDefense.org.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests