Don't Let Disaster Capitalists Get Hands On Haiti

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Don't Let Disaster Capitalists Get Hands On Haiti

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Jan 15, 2010 8:00 pm

Don't Let The Disaster Capitalists Get Their Hands On Haiti

Haiti was a nation of farmers, but thanks to the strings attached to U.S. aid, government policies made profitable farming unprofitable. So the farmers were pushed to the cities to provide a cheap manufacturing labor force. All those people you see on the TV in their shattered shantytowns? We helped put them there. With exploitative loans and yes, even a classic CIA-backed coup, we helped create this mess.

Here's Naomi Klein, the author of "The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism," speaking Wednesday night at the Ethical Culture Society to warn us against it happening again:

But as I write about in The Shock Doctrine, crises are often used now as the pretext for pushing through policies that you cannot push through under times of stability. Countries in periods of extreme crisis are desperate for any kind of aid, any kind of money, and are not in a position to negotiate fairly the terms of that exchange.

And I just want to pause for a second and read you something, which is pretty extraordinary. I just put this up on my website. The headline is “Haiti: Stop Them Before They Shock Again.” This went up a few hours ago, three hours ago, I believe, on the Heritage Foundation website.

“Amidst the Suffering, Crisis in Haiti Offers Opportunities to the U.S. In addition to providing immediate humanitarian assistance, the U.S. response to the tragic earthquake in Haiti earthquake offers opportunities to re-shape Haiti’s long-dysfunctional government and economy as well as to improve the image of the United States in the region.” And then goes on.

Now, I don’t know whether things are improving or not, because it took the Heritage Foundation thirteen days before they issued thirty-two free market solutions for Hurricane Katrina. We put that document up on our website, as well. It was close down the housing projects, turn the Gulf Coast into a tax-free free enterprise zone, get rid of the labor laws that forces contractors to pay a living wage. Yeah, so it took them thirteen days before they did that in the case of Katrina. In the case of Haiti, they didn’t even wait twenty-four hours.

Now, why I say I don’t know whether it’s improving or not is that two hours ago they took this down. So somebody told them that it wasn’t couth. And then they put up something that was much more delicate. Fortunately, the investigative reporters at Democracy Now! managed to find that earlier document in a Google cache. But what you’ll find now is a much gentler “Things to Remember While Helping Haiti.” And buried down there, it says, “Long-term reforms for Haitian democracy and its economy are also badly overdue.”

But the point is, we need to make sure that the aid that goes to Haiti is, one, grants, not loans. This is absolutely crucial. This is an already heavily indebted country. This is a disaster that, as Amy said, on the one hand is nature, is, you know, an earthquake; on the other hand is the creation, is worsened by the poverty that our governments have been so complicit in deepening. Crises—natural disasters are so much worse in countries like Haiti, because you have soil erosion because the poverty means people are building in very, very precarious ways, so houses just slide down because they are built in places where they shouldn’t be built. All of this is interconnected. But we have to be absolutely clear that this tragedy, which is part natural, part unnatural, must, under no circumstances, be used to, one, further indebt Haiti, and, two, to push through unpopular corporatist policies in the interests of our corporations. And this is not a conspiracy theory. They have done it again and again
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Don't Let Disaster Capitalists Get Hands On Haiti

Postby Perelandra » Fri Jan 15, 2010 8:24 pm

Some background from Democracy Now.
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/1/15/bush_was_responsible_for_destroying_haitian
AMY GOODMAN:
But just before the program, I spoke with Randall Robinson. He’s the founder and past president of TransAfrica. He’s currently a visiting law professor at Pennsylvania State University, though he goes home to Saint Kitts tomorrow, where he lives. His most recent book is An Unbroken Agony: Haiti, from Revolution to the Kidnapping of a President. I began by just asking for his thoughts about the crisis right now in Haiti.

RANDALL ROBINSON: It’s important, in trying to find ways to help, to be generous and to give, and to give generously. I would like to commend President Obama for his strong and fast response of a commitment of $100 million. Operations are already underway. I think the world is being incredibly generous, as I understand the pace of things to be at this point, the pace of giving. But, of course, as many lives as can possibly be salvaged need to be salvaged as quickly as possible, and I have every reason to believe that the administration and others are doing the very best that they can. As a private citizen, it’s my responsibility, and our general responsibility, to support every effort that’s being made to save lives in Haiti.

AMY GOODMAN: Word is now President Préval has said they’ve just burned—buried 7,000 bodies in a mass grave, but the most important thing right now is the search equipment, to go in and to save people who are just hanging on, perhaps who have been crushed, who are hidden in the rubble. And yet, that has yet to come. Some word is there’s a lot of aid at the airport not able to get through, and then other aid just hasn’t come.

RANDALL ROBINSON: Well, that’s not surprising. It’s hard for things to function when virtually all of the infrastructure has been destroyed. The Haitian government is unable to function, I would imagine, because it’s under the same burden that all Haitians are under. The President’s home has been destroyed. It’s hard to get from point A to point B, because the roads are blocked, petrol is not available. Heavy equipment is not yet available.

But in the spirit of konbit, the Haitian Creole word for “collaboration and cooperation,” Haitians are doing everything they can. They are resilient, industrious, courageous people. They’re doing everything they can to save the lives of their fellows, and they’re doing it, thus far, with very little, because it’s taking a while for that kind of assistance to materialize.

AMY GOODMAN: President Obama has tapped President Clinton and former President George W. Bush to coordinate the aid relief to Haiti. I was wondering your thoughts on that.

RANDALL ROBINSON: Well, Amy, I’m, of course, troubled by that. I don’t think this is the time—neither the time nor the place to discuss those things that have troubled me for a long time in the history of American policy towards Haiti. Now the focus must be upon the rescue efforts that are underway to save lives.

But I hope that this experience, this disaster, causes American media to take a keener look at Haiti, at the Haitian people, at their wonderful creativity, at their art, at their culture, and what they’ve had to bear. It has been described to the American people as a problem of their own making. Well, that’s simply not the case. Haiti has been, of course, put upon by outside powers for its whole post-slavery history, from 1804 up until the present.

Of course, President Bush was responsible for destroying Haitian democracy in 2004, when he and American forces abducted President Aristide and his wife, taking them off to Africa, and they are now in South Africa. President Clinton has largely sponsored a program of economic development that supports the idea of sweatshops. Haitians in Haiti today make 38 cents an hour. They don’t make a high enough wage to pay for their lunch and transportation to and from work. But this is the kind of economic program that President Clinton has supported. I think that is sad, that these two should be joined in this kind of effort. It sends, I think, the wrong kind of signal. But that is not what we should focus on now. We should focus on saving lives.

But in the last analysis, I hope that American media will not just continue to—the refrain of Haiti being the poorest country in the western hemisphere, but will come to ask the question, why? What distinguishes Haiti from the rest of the Caribbean? Why are the other countries, like the country in which I live, Saint Kitts, middle-income and successful countries, and Haiti is mired in economic despair? What happened? And who’s had a hand in it? If Haiti has been under a series of serial dictatorship, who armed the dictators? There are other hands in Haiti’s problem. Of course Haiti is responsible for some of its own failures, but probably not principally responsible. We need to know that. We need to be told the whole story of these wonderful, resilient, courageous and industrious people. And we have not been told that. I would hope that this would be an opportunity for doing so.

AMY GOODMAN: In talking about President Bush, while most people may not know the role the US played in the ouster of President Aristide February 29th, 2004, probably what would come to mind when there’s any discussion of relief efforts is Katrina.

RANDALL ROBINSON: Yes. The problem of what happened in February 2004 continues. We had democracy in Haiti, and that democracy was blighted by the Bush administration. And now President Aristide’s party is prohibited from participating in the electoral process. His party is the largest party in Haiti. And why should we be so afraid to let his party participate? If Haitian people don’t want them, they won’t vote for them. That is the very essence of democracy, that people get a chance to stand for election, and the electorate gets a chance to make a decision. But we have obstructed that process in Haiti. We have done that under the Clinton administration, under the Bush administration, and that continues under the Obama administration. And that is indeed unfortunate. I am imploring American media to examine this in whole part, in ways that media have failed to do so up until now.

AMY GOODMAN: This history, the two crises, the natural catastrophe that is the earthquake, that the Red Cross is now saying they believe perhaps up to 50,000 people have died—and we’re not talking about, you know, just what has happened in the past, but what is currently happening. Who was just quoted? Lieutenant General Russel Honoré, the retired general who took charge of relief efforts in New Orleans, said that aid should have arrived, that said the US military should have arrived in earthquake-devastated Haiti twenty-four hours earlier. Of course, as we know, people trapped under rubble, every minute counts.

RANDALL ROBINSON: Well, I’m not in a position to comment on that. I simply can’t make an assessment of how fast or how slowly they arrived or how soon they should have arrived. And so, I will withhold comment on that.

AMY GOODMAN: Does it make you nervous to hear about US soldiers on Haitian soil? If you can share a little more of the history of the United States and Haiti—or do you think this isn’t the time to talk, for example, about 1915 to 1934, the first US Marine occupation, and then—

RANDALL ROBINSON: Well, I should think it would—I should think, Amy, it would make Haitians nervous under these circumstances. Of course, I’m sure that they are, understandably, quite happy to see assistance from any quarter.

But it was in 1915 that Woodrow Wilson, of course, with a force of American Marines, invaded and occupied Haiti until 1934. They seized land, redistributed it to American corporations, took control of the country, ran the country, collected customs duties for that period of time, and ran the country as if it were an American possession.

But this has marked the relationship since Toussaint L’Ouverture and an army of ex-slaves overthrew French rule in 1804. The French exacted, of course, reparations from the new free black republic of Haiti, bankrupting the country. The Vatican didn’t recognize Haiti until the 1860s. The Western nations of the world, responding to a call for isolation and embargo from Thomas Jefferson, imposed sanctions on Haiti that lasted until the Emancipation Proclamation in the United States, of course followed in the twentieth century by President Wilson’s occupation and then by the dictatorial blight of Duvaliers, Papa and son, and all of the other military generals that, of course, were armed by the United States.

And so, Haiti’s plight up until this point has been, in some significant way, attributable to bad and painful American, French and Western policy that some believe is caused or described, motivated by Toussaint L’Ouverture’s victory over Napoleon. The French have never forgiven the Haitian people for this.

AMY GOODMAN: Former President Jean-Bertrand Aristide said he’s ready to return to help rebuild his country in the wake of the devastating earthquake. Why can’t he just return?

RANDALL ROBINSON: Well, the—I’m not sure what the stated American policy is, but of course the Bush administration policy was to forbid his return. But any obstruction of his return by any power would constitute a violation of international law, a violation of the UN Charter, a violation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, a violation of any number of major UN human rights conventions. You cannot restrict people either from leaving their country—citizens, either from leaving their country or returning to their country. He has every right to return home, should he want to. And one would hope that no administration, the American administration nor any other, would stand in the way of his passage home.

AMY GOODMAN: A few nights ago, Naomi Klein was in New York, author of The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, and she quoted a Heritage Foundation press release that came out very soon after the earthquake, talking about this being an opportunity. That is the question, whether it is an opportunity, she said, of the corporate vultures hovering over Haiti, waiting to descend and restructure Haiti, or an opportunity for progressive Haitians to rebuild their own country, to rebuild Haiti. What are your thoughts about this?

RANDALL ROBINSON: Well, it’s an opportunity, I think, for the American people to, at long last, learn the full truth about Haiti and about our relationship with Haiti. They’ve known—they’ve been caused to know very little about it. And I think progress—a new beginning starts with the truth. That is a truth that has been suppressed for all of these many years. The American people know almost nothing about what happened in 2004, about the abduction of President Aristide, about the destruction of Haiti’s democracy as a result of the efforts of both the United States and the French government. We need to know that.

And in the last analysis, Haitians have at their disposal a vigorous, creative, industrious and successful community in the United States, in France, in Canada. The Haitian diaspora is very much engaged with Haiti. They need to be given an opportunity to help Haiti rebuild itself.

We need to go away from what we’ve been doing in support, a sort of an unconditional support, for wealthy Haitians that are running sweatshops in the country, that pay people appallingly low wages. That is not the way to any bright future for Haiti. And that is the—of course, the idea that former President Clinton has been advancing for Haiti. I think it is sad. It can’t work. It won’t work. It will brew a further resentment of the United States.

And I think that the only way we can move ahead constructively with Haiti is to begin by telling the full story of our relationship with Haiti since 1804, what happened in the nineteenth century and what has happened in the twentieth century, so that Americans will understand at long last that Haiti’s misery is largely not of its own making. They will learn of a Haitian people who are quite different from those who have been described to them. And I think it is at that point we can make the beginning that we need to make and that is rooted in a policy that is constructive and sensitive and caring and productive for the United States, as well as for the Haitian people.

AMY GOODMAN: Randall Robinson, founder and past president of TransAfrica. He fasted almost until death years ago under the Clinton administration to try to get President Clinton to close Guantanamo. In that case, it was to close Guantanamo so that Haitian refugees who were trying to escape the coup in Haiti were able to come into the United States. Randall Robinson’s latest book is called An Unbroken Agony: Haiti, from Revolution to the Kidnapping of a President.
“The past is never dead. It's not even past.” - William Faulkner
User avatar
Perelandra
 
Posts: 1648
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Don't Let Disaster Capitalists Get Hands On Haiti

Postby Nordic » Fri Jan 15, 2010 9:26 pm

Well, you know they're going to.

And you know that once our military comes into "help" they're probably not gonna leave.

I don't think there's any stopping it.

But I'm glad somebody is talking and writing about it.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Don't Let Disaster Capitalists Get Hands On Haiti

Postby Blue » Fri Jan 15, 2010 10:14 pm

I was at a grocery store today I've never been to and the cashier said the weirdest thing out of the blue to me. She scanned my few items and as I was paying she looked at me and said "You know they say that half of those poor people in Haiti weren't able to read or write." I was stunned and just looked at her. Why did she say that? We had no conversation prior to her comment. I felt like saying "Fuck, lady, nearly half the people in some impoverished American states can't read or write past the 4th grade."

I was absolutely shocked when I saw pictures last year of how denuded of trees Haiti had become. I think I saw that in the movie "Home."
User avatar
Blue
 
Posts: 725
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:39 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Don't Let Disaster Capitalists Get Hands On Haiti

Postby Cordelia » Fri Jan 15, 2010 10:55 pm

Nordic wrote:Well, you know they're going to.

And you know that once our military comes into "help" they're probably not gonna leave.

I don't think there's any stopping it.

Reports are that violence is escalating rapily in Port au Prince. In addition to the 800 UN Peacekeepers from Canada, the U.S. may be sending 1,200 Marines:

"And will violence ignite in the prolonged misery likely to follow Tuesday's destruction?

"It's frightening to think about -- there are always people who take advantage of crisis, even in New Orleans,'' said an official of a private relief organization working in Haiti. "And Haiti has such a fragile political system -- peoples' lives and livelihoods are at stake.''

Air Force Gen. Douglas Fraser, who heads U.S. Southern Command, the regional military organization, said Wednesday he may ask that a task force of warships and 1,200 combat Marines, organized as a Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), be directed to Haiti. A MEU, embarked on ships with helicopters, humanitarian supplies and construction equipment, could be a key component of reconstruction projects in Haiti.

Or the Marines could be directed to quell violence and keep order.

Fraser, asked at a Pentagon briefing Wednesday whether there was widespread looting or other violence in Port-au-Prince, said: "I don't know the answer to it directly ... I'm still trying to understand what the situation is on the ground.

"I'm not going to speculate on the future,'' he told reporters. "We've got a very precise focus right now, and that's the disaster that Haiti has suffered. We're focused on the lifesaving measures that we need to do there.''

http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/01/14 ... e-tragedy/


How long before XE Services (formerly Blackwater) sends their 'peacekeepers' to help relief efforts?
The greatest sin is to be unconscious. ~ Carl Jung

We may not choose the parameters of our destiny. But we give it its content. ~ Dag Hammarskjold 'Waymarks'
User avatar
Cordelia
 
Posts: 3697
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Don't Let Disaster Capitalists Get Hands On Haiti

Postby Nordic » Sat Jan 16, 2010 12:30 am

I saw, somewhere, and I can't remember where, from someone who was on the ground there, that this "there's violence spinning out of control" thing was a lie.

It makes sense that they would spread that lie (if it's actually a lie) in order to justify sending in troops, or blackwater fucks, or whatever.

I'll see if I can find it. I can't remember where I saw that! The whole thing kind of freaks me out, so I've deliberately been holding it at arm's length.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Don't Let Disaster Capitalists Get Hands On Haiti

Postby nathan28 » Sat Jan 16, 2010 12:56 am

Nordic wrote:I saw, somewhere, and I can't remember where, from someone who was on the ground there, that this "there's violence spinning out of control" thing was a lie.

It makes sense that they would spread that lie (if it's actually a lie) in order to justify sending in troops, or blackwater fucks, or whatever.

I'll see if I can find it. I can't remember where I saw that! The whole thing kind of freaks me out, so I've deliberately been holding it at arm's length.



Between that and "half of them couldn't read or write"...

It is so transparent what is going on it is bothering me. Haiti is about to become the world's test-case for "diaster capitalism" recovery, and I don't fucking like it at all. Did anyone see that shit David Brooks wrote? Honestly it's like he just takes a dump, throws some still shots from Birth of a Nation and some quotes to The Greatest Generation into it, and suddenly people across America are talking about how important it is. I would say, "how does he sleep at night", but I assume he just cries himself into slumber.
„MAN MUSS BEFUERCHTEN, DASS DAS GANZE IN GOTTES HAND IST"

THE JEERLEADER
User avatar
nathan28
 
Posts: 2957
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Don't Let Disaster Capitalists Get Hands On Haiti

Postby Cordelia » Sat Jan 16, 2010 10:21 am

nathan28 wrote:
Nordic wrote:I saw, somewhere, and I can't remember where, from someone who was on the ground there, that this "there's violence spinning out of control" thing was a lie.

It makes sense that they would spread that lie (if it's actually a lie) in order to justify sending in troops, or blackwater fucks, or whatever.

I'll see if I can find it. I can't remember where I saw that! The whole thing kind of freaks me out, so I've deliberately been holding it at arm's length.



Between that and "half of them couldn't read or write"...

It is so transparent what is going on it is bothering me. Haiti is about to become the world's test-case for "diaster capitalism" recovery, and I don't fucking like it at all. Did anyone see that shit David Brooks wrote? Honestly it's like he just takes a dump, throws some still shots from Birth of a Nation and some quotes to The Greatest Generation into it, and suddenly people across America are talking about how important it is. I would say, "how does he sleep at night", but I assume he just cries himself into slumber.

By adding that link and one I'm not familiar with I figured I'd probably kick up criticism of the article. But, I was quickly seeking verification about potential violence after talking with someone who knows a teacher and several students trapped, unhurt, but unable to get out and get to the airport. There were reports, supposedly through them, that looting & violence are increasing. And you know what? Why wouldn't it? Where there's every human survival element involved and when people are injured, desperate for themselves and their children, they might do anything to stay alive. It's got nothing to do with dismissing the Haitian people in the same way one would disdain a lack of literacy (speaking of which, increasing illiteracy is spreading here, in the United States).

The Marines might be called in to get Americans out. Though the circumstances are entirely different, that brings to mind the French and Belgium troops sent to Rwanda in 1994, to rescue and evacuate white Europeans while leaving pleading Rwandans behind, to face certain death.

Edited to add: I don't have TV so I haven't seen CNN or other MSM propaganda.
The greatest sin is to be unconscious. ~ Carl Jung

We may not choose the parameters of our destiny. But we give it its content. ~ Dag Hammarskjold 'Waymarks'
User avatar
Cordelia
 
Posts: 3697
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Don't Let Disaster Capitalists Get Hands On Haiti

Postby zero hour » Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:52 pm

At the risk of coming across as insensitive/unsympathetic to the plight of the Haitians, how can Obama make an initial pledge of $100 million in quake relief to a country that is not under the purview of the US government; a country which has suffered devastation that is tragic, yes, but that devastation cannot be attributed to the action/inaction of the US. I know, I know, there's a valid point in the Brooksian argument that "this is not a natural destruction story/this is a poverty story," but I don't buy that it's the US's job to cure the world's poverty when its own house is far from in order.

Which is my larger point: where is the $100 million (+) in relief aid for the millions of Americans made homeless/impoverished/otherwise devestated by direct action/inaction on the part of the US government in its criminal treatment of the so-called "free market" during the past decade (and beyond)? How do We the People have $100 million to charitably donate when we don't have that much money to sustain ourselves (and nevermind to sustain our "relief" efforts in other countries in the other hemisphere, the devastation of which we have a far greater complicity in creating/fostering.)

Like all citizens of the world with some semblance of a soul, I mourn the situation in Haiti, pre- and post-quake. I admire and applaud relief contributions made by nations and individuals who are in a position to afford them, but, sadly, the United States is not in a position to be engaging in superfluous charity (which, as they say, begins at home), and I can't view Obama's pledge of $100 million that we don't have as a ill-advised PR stunt.
et je reste sonnée jusqu'à Paques
au paradis des têtes à claques
zero hour
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 4:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Don't Let Disaster Capitalists Get Hands On Haiti

Postby Maddy » Sat Jan 16, 2010 5:32 pm

zero hour wrote:Which is my larger point: where is the $100 million (+) in relief aid for the millions of Americans made homeless/impoverished/otherwise devestated by direct action/inaction on the part of the US government in its criminal treatment of the so-called "free market" during the past decade (and beyond)? How do We the People have $100 million to charitably donate when we don't have that much money to sustain ourselves (and nevermind to sustain our "relief" efforts in other countries in the other hemisphere, the devastation of which we have a far greater complicity in creating/fostering.)

Like all citizens of the world with some semblance of a soul, I mourn the situation in Haiti, pre- and post-quake. I admire and applaud relief contributions made by nations and individuals who are in a position to afford them, but, sadly, the United States is not in a position to be engaging in superfluous charity (which, as they say, begins at home), and I can't view Obama's pledge of $100 million that we don't have as a ill-advised PR stunt.


Facebook is doing a huge plea for donations for Haiti, and so is Gaia Online. So I'm sure other places are as well. Curious if this is part of what you're speaking of, or something they're doing on their own. I have no idea if they've done this before for other things. I've never seen it.
Be kind - it costs nothing. ~ Maddy ~
User avatar
Maddy
 
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:33 am
Location: The Borderlands
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Don't Let Disaster Capitalists Get Hands On Haiti

Postby zero hour » Sat Jan 16, 2010 5:50 pm

As long as the pleas of Facebook/Gaia/whichever other online mediums are soliciting donations are legit (there's already been news of scam operations targeting would-be donors) and all of the money is going directly to disaster relief, then I think that's wonderful and I hope they are able to raise a lot of money. Even the Obama/Bush/Clinton triumverate's fundraising efforts are okay by me; if an individual (or, especially, if a corporation) has the means to dip into savings or cut back on expenses in order to allocate some funding to a worthy humanitarian cause, and so chooses to do, then hats off, and my opinion of humanity is somewhat raised.

That's completely separate from what what I'm talking about, and what I have a problem with, which is the US government donating (tax-payer?) money to international relief aid. Sorry, but in this economic climate, there are a lot of people in the US who cannot afford to be charitable, and who indeed are in dire need of economic assistance themselves. As citizens of this country, most of whom have paid taxes, presumably, at some point, it is my belief that those people have first dibs on economic relief funding from the US government.
et je reste sonnée jusqu'à Paques
au paradis des têtes à claques
zero hour
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 4:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Don't Let Disaster Capitalists Get Hands On Haiti

Postby wallflower » Sat Jan 16, 2010 5:56 pm

Surely there are disaster capitalists, but the shock doctrine seems an ideology widely held, or at least the sense that there is opportunity in disaster. So it seems evident to me that violence will indeed add significatly to the suffering of Haitian people.

David Brooks was all over yesterday with his message "the programs that really work involve intrusive paternalism" (editorial http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/15/opinion/15brooks.html). Stunning to me he could say that with a straight face given the legacy of Papa Doc!

More substantial is his criticism of microaid. My own view is that small projects on the ground are best over the long haul. And that what's needed is more communication, cooperation and coordination. I'm optimistic that much can be achieved.

TEDBlog has a post http://blog.ted.com/2010/01/ushahidi_brings.php telling the story of getting Ushadhidi up and running--it was up before the day was out. Twitter became an important source for news about the situation. More of us can be organized now because more of us can pay attention. The task is to find ways we can help increase organization. That's a very different approach than the ham-fisted paternalism Brooks thinks necessary.
create something good
User avatar
wallflower
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Don't Let Disaster Capitalists Get Hands On Haiti

Postby seemslikeadream » Sat Jan 16, 2010 6:06 pm

zero hour wrote:At the risk of coming across as insensitive/unsympathetic to the plight of the Haitians, how can Obama make an initial pledge of $100 million in quake relief to a country that is not under the purview of the US government; a country which has suffered devastation that is tragic, yes, but that devastation cannot be attributed to the action/inaction of the US.



The United States did not honor the Santiago treaty in signed by the United States, which clearly states that any government democratically elected in the Western Hemisphere that seeks the support of other Organization of American States member nations, when threatened with an overthrow, will be assisted. That agreement was signed by the first President Bush in 1991. Since goergie jr. ignored that treaty when Aristide was overthrown and forcibly flown out of Haiti by the U.S. maybe it's just payback time.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: Don't Let Disaster Capitalists Get Hands On Haiti

Postby wallflower » Sat Jan 16, 2010 6:37 pm

Gil Scott Heron famously told us in the 1970's "The Revolution Will Not Be Televised" An I think that still goes. But on the other hand the collapse probably will simply because it's too big to ignore. Mike Davis wrote a book "The Planet of Slums" and it seems to me one of the important points of it is it's folly to believe we can ignore this dramatic revolution in the way humans live.

http://www.grist.org/article/davis

The conditions creating the slums -- greed, inequity, poor planning, and disrespect for human rights -- are human forces, but they tend to intensify the earth's natural forces. Those forces, ecological and biological, don't always behave as predictably as we would like, or stay within their bounds.


The government of the USA is important, our national status is too. But humanity is connected such that national status cannot save us.

The president is within the law to order aid to Haiti. The political question of whether such money is better spent in country surely extend beyond this particular use of money to the more than 700 Garrisons the USA has created around the world. Making the money pledged to the Haiti rescue the issue seems heartless because it ignores the wider context of US conduct. And it inflames the the racist sentiments which always divide the poor against their own interests.
create something good
User avatar
wallflower
 
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 11:35 pm
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Don't Let Disaster Capitalists Get Hands On Haiti

Postby sunny » Sun Jan 17, 2010 12:46 pm

Doctors Without Borders Cargo Plane With Full Hospital and Staff Blocked From Landing in Port-au-Prince
Demands Deployment of Lifesaving Medical Equipment Given Priority

Port-au-Prince/Paris /New York, 17 January 2009—Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) urges that its cargo planes carrying essential medical and surgical material be allowed to land in Port-au-Prince in order to treat thousands of wounded waiting for vital surgical operations. Priority must be given immediately to planes carrying lifesaving equipment and medical personnel.

Despite guarantees, given by the United Nations and the US Defense Department, an MSF cargo plane carrying an inflatable surgical hospital was blocked from landing in Port-au-Prince on Saturday, and was re-routed to Samana, in Dominican Republic. All material from the cargo is now being sent by truck from Samana, but this has added a 24-hour delay for the arrival of the hospital.

A second MSF plane is currently on its way and scheduled to land today in Port- au-Prince at around 10 am local time with additional lifesaving medical material and the rest of the equipment for the hospital. If this plane is also rerouted then the installation of the hospital will be further delayed, in a situation where thousands of wounded are still in need of life saving treatment.

The inflatable hospital includes 2 operating theaters, an intensive care unit, 100-bed hospitalization capacity, an emergency room and all the necessary equipment needed for sterilizing material.

MSF teams are currently working around the clock in 5 different hospitals in Port-au-Prince, but only 2 operating theaters are fully functional, while a third operating theater has been improvised for minor surgery due to the massive influx of wounded and lack of functional referral structures.

http://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/pr ... ss-release
Choose love
sunny
 
Posts: 5220
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 10:18 pm
Location: Alabama
Blog: View Blog (1)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 178 guests