The Scale of the Universe (Damndest Thing I Ever Saw)

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

The Scale of the Universe (Damndest Thing I Ever Saw)

Postby JackRiddler » Sat Jan 30, 2010 7:27 pm

You have to visit this. Operate using the arrow keys.

http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/525347

Mind blowing when you think that everything from the neutrino to the present universe horizon is confirmed.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 16007
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Scale of the Universe (Damndest Thing I Ever Saw)

Postby tazmic » Sat Jan 30, 2010 7:42 pm

I was surprised to see how big a neutrino is, compared to... the 'smallest physically meaning span'. Huge!

It interests me to note that between the neutrino and 'everything' we are kinda in the middle of the scale. So there's just as much out there as in here too!

I've seen far more complex attempts at this display, that weren't nearly as good. A great find, thanks.
"It ever was, and is, and shall be, ever-living fire, in measures being kindled and in measures going out." - Heraclitus

"There aren't enough small numbers to meet the many demands made of them." - Strong Law of Small Numbers
User avatar
tazmic
 
Posts: 1097
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Scale of the Universe (Damndest Thing I Ever Saw)

Postby MacCruiskeen » Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:07 pm

That website fosters delusions. It made me feel insignificant.
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Scale of the Universe (Damndest Thing I Ever Saw)

Postby brainpanhandler » Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:13 pm

There are earthworms 7 meters long?

And why can't I subdivide a Planck length? Who says it makes "no physical sense"? I mean if Zeno's suction cup dart is one planck length from my forehead doesn't it have to travel half a planck length before it reaches it's target?
"Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity." - Martin Luther King Jr.
User avatar
brainpanhandler
 
Posts: 5114
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 9:38 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Scale of the Universe (Damndest Thing I Ever Saw)

Postby MacCruiskeen » Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:47 pm

brainpanhandler wrote:And why can't I subdivide a Planck length? Who says it makes "no physical sense"? I mean if Zeno's suction cup dart is one planck length from my forehead doesn't it have to travel half a planck length before it reaches it's target?


And then it would have to travel half that remaining distance (i.e., 1/4 Planck length) and then half that (i.e., 1/8 Planck length), and so on ad infinitum. In other words, neither Zeno's nor anyone else's arrow can ever reach your forehead. Which is reassuring, but dangerously so, because of course arrows have often, in fact, reached foreheads.

Not that I understand this myself! It is all highly weird.

The Modernity of Zeno’s Paradoxes
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Scale of the Universe (Damndest Thing I Ever Saw)

Postby tazmic » Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:48 pm

I mean if Zeno's suction cup dart is one planck length from my forehead doesn't it have to travel half a planck length before it reaches it's target?


If it were that close it would already be there, and if it only moved half a plank length it would be in the same place.

My turn for a question. Is not claiming a minimum sensible distance the same as stating time is discrete?
"It ever was, and is, and shall be, ever-living fire, in measures being kindled and in measures going out." - Heraclitus

"There aren't enough small numbers to meet the many demands made of them." - Strong Law of Small Numbers
User avatar
tazmic
 
Posts: 1097
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Scale of the Universe (Damndest Thing I Ever Saw)

Postby tazmic » Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:52 pm

And then it would have to travel half that remaining distance (i.e., 1/4 Planck length) and then half that (i.e., 1/8 Planck length), and so on ad infinitum. In other words, neither Zeno's nor anyone else's arrow can ever reach your forehead.


But it's getting twice as 'fast' each time. If you agree that the arrow can always travel 'half the remaining distance' then it can go as far as you like. 1 + 1/2 + 1/4 +... = 2. And that can be 2 anything.
"It ever was, and is, and shall be, ever-living fire, in measures being kindled and in measures going out." - Heraclitus

"There aren't enough small numbers to meet the many demands made of them." - Strong Law of Small Numbers
User avatar
tazmic
 
Posts: 1097
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Scale of the Universe (Damndest Thing I Ever Saw)

Postby MacCruiskeen » Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:57 pm

tazmic wrote:1 + 1/2 + 1/4 +... = 2.


Surely not. It never quite gets there. Like pi, it never ends.

1.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 is still less than 2. (Or is it, if you add enough 9s? That's the question.)
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Scale of the Universe (Damndest Thing I Ever Saw)

Postby 82_28 » Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:01 pm

It has to do with equations. Expert math can't equate that seemingly infinitely small. Probably the solutions have all resulted in errors. Like the old skool superstring theory. Calculations came up with all manner of various numbers of dimensions, but the exact number couldn't be completely known, let alone envisioned, because various variables plugged in gave solutions, but it was (when I was reading about that shit [Micheo Kaku's Hyperspace]) unknowable which answer was correct.

Now, grant me that I am a mathematical idiot and only enjoy reading about the theories. I have never been able to sit through one damned upper level math class in all of my life. Thus I never graduated college. But into this stuff, I am.

Thanks for the link!
There is no me. There is no you. There is all. There is no you. There is no me. And that is all. A profound acceptance of an enormous pageantry. A haunting certainty that the unifying principle of this universe is love. -- Propagandhi
User avatar
82_28
 
Posts: 11194
Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 4:34 am
Location: North of Queen Anne
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Scale of the Universe (Damndest Thing I Ever Saw)

Postby tazmic » Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:06 pm

From the comments in Mac's link:

'in Wheeler-DeWitt cosmology the fundamental Planck length coexists with continuous space and time.'

So now I know :?

Surely not. It never quite gets there. 1.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 is still less than 2. (Or is it, if you add enough 9s? That's the question.)


That's what the ... meant. As it takes half the amount of time to travel half the previous distance there is 'all the time in the world' to get to the end, and it would only take a finite amount of time do it.
"It ever was, and is, and shall be, ever-living fire, in measures being kindled and in measures going out." - Heraclitus

"There aren't enough small numbers to meet the many demands made of them." - Strong Law of Small Numbers
User avatar
tazmic
 
Posts: 1097
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Scale of the Universe (Damndest Thing I Ever Saw)

Postby MacCruiskeen » Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:09 pm

tazmic wrote:From the comments in Mac's link:

'in Wheeler-DeWitt cosmology the fundamental Planck length coexists with continuous space and time.'

So now I know :?

Surely not. It never quite gets there. 1.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 is still less than 2. (Or is it, if you add enough 9s? That's the question.)


That's what the ... meant. As it takes half the amount of time to travel half the previous distance there is 'all the time in the world' to get to the end, and it would only take a finite amount of time do it.


Thanks. I had a brief mental... something* there, where I thought I understood it.

*Explosion?
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Scale of the Universe (Damndest Thing I Ever Saw)

Postby tazmic » Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:17 pm

Thanks. I had a brief mental... something* there, where I thought I understood it.

Cool (I was hoping someone would come along with a better explanation, as it's bed time for me) :D

But, Damn what a cool site:

"In the enigmatic Canon 1 a 2 from J. S. Bach’s “Musical Offering” (1747) (also known as “crab canon” or “canon cancrizans”), the manuscript shows a single score, whose beginning joins with the end. This space is topologically equivalent to a bundle of the line segment over the circle, known as a Möbius strip. The simultaneous performance of the deeply related forward and backward paths gives appearance to two voices, whose symmetry determines a reversible evolution. A musical universe is built and then is “unplayed” back into silence."

http://strangepaths.com/canon-1-a-2/2009/01/18/en/

Thanks for that.
"It ever was, and is, and shall be, ever-living fire, in measures being kindled and in measures going out." - Heraclitus

"There aren't enough small numbers to meet the many demands made of them." - Strong Law of Small Numbers
User avatar
tazmic
 
Posts: 1097
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Scale of the Universe (Damndest Thing I Ever Saw)

Postby smoking since 1879 » Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:04 pm

it's fractal dude, elephants all the way down....

ever see a big wave, in the ocean?

look close at the surface, there's little waves there too ...
"Now that the assertive, the self-aggrandising, the arrogant and the self-opinionated have allowed their obnoxious foolishness to beggar us all I see no reason in listening to their drivelling nonsense any more." Stanilic
smoking since 1879
 
Posts: 509
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 10:20 pm
Location: CZ
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Scale of the Universe (Damndest Thing I Ever Saw)

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:10 pm

MacCruiskeen wrote:That website fosters delusions. It made me feel insignificant.


Thanks for the best LULZ I've had all day...needed that.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The Scale of the Universe (Damndest Thing I Ever Saw)

Postby Laodicean » Sat Jan 30, 2010 11:17 pm

It's about attraction, see...

There are earthworms 7 meters long?


I mean, I'm just attracted to the idea of catching the fish that bites on to that 7 meter long earthwarm.

Attractions, man. Every(w)here...attractions...
User avatar
Laodicean
 
Posts: 3503
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:39 pm
Blog: View Blog (16)
Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 168 guests