Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
brainpanhandler wrote:And why can't I subdivide a Planck length? Who says it makes "no physical sense"? I mean if Zeno's suction cup dart is one planck length from my forehead doesn't it have to travel half a planck length before it reaches it's target?
I mean if Zeno's suction cup dart is one planck length from my forehead doesn't it have to travel half a planck length before it reaches it's target?
And then it would have to travel half that remaining distance (i.e., 1/4 Planck length) and then half that (i.e., 1/8 Planck length), and so on ad infinitum. In other words, neither Zeno's nor anyone else's arrow can ever reach your forehead.
tazmic wrote:1 + 1/2 + 1/4 +... = 2.
Surely not. It never quite gets there. 1.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 is still less than 2. (Or is it, if you add enough 9s? That's the question.)
tazmic wrote:From the comments in Mac's link:
'in Wheeler-DeWitt cosmology the fundamental Planck length coexists with continuous space and time.'
So now I know
Surely not. It never quite gets there. 1.99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 is still less than 2. (Or is it, if you add enough 9s? That's the question.)
That's what the ... meant. As it takes half the amount of time to travel half the previous distance there is 'all the time in the world' to get to the end, and it would only take a finite amount of time do it.
Thanks. I had a brief mental... something* there, where I thought I understood it.
MacCruiskeen wrote:That website fosters delusions. It made me feel insignificant.
There are earthworms 7 meters long?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 168 guests