Has The World Gone Mad?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Has The World Gone Mad?

Postby American Dream » Tue Jul 13, 2010 7:48 am

Has The World Gone Mad?

Fiscal Austerity In Response To The Great Recession!

July 13, 2010

By Peter Bohmer and Robin Hahnel



[This is the first of a three part ZNet commentary series this month, about global economic crisis and relating to Greece, by Peter Bohmer and Robin Hahnel. Robin spoke at the Greek anti-authoritarian movement’s B-Festival in Athens last May and Professor Bohmer will be speaking at the festival in Thessaloniki in September.]


Once upon a time most economists acknowledged that John Maynard Keynes had it right about what to do when unemployment was high. But in light of the fiscal austerity being practiced by governments all over the world, and the sermons of pundits preaching the urgent necessity of reducing budget deficits now, one would think Lord Keynes had never been born. An exacerbated Nobel Laureate Paul Krugman, put it this way: “Spend now, while the economy remains depressed; save later, once it has recovered. How hard is that to understand? Very hard, if the current state of political debate is any indication. All around the world, politicians seem determined to do the reverse.” (New York Times, June 20, 2010)

The problem is that doing the reverse -- cutting spending and increasing tax rates because a deep recession has reduced tax revenues -- is exactly what Herbert Hoover did in 1930, turning the financial crash of 1929 into the Great Depression of 1929 - 1939.

Keynes became the most important economist of the twentieth century because he taught economists and politicians alike that their knee jerk reaction to cut spending when tax revenues fall due to recession is exactly backwards. And yet this is what Germany and England are doing. This is what the European Commission and European Central Bank are forcing Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece, and Spain to do. This is what governments of Eastern European countries are doing in an attempt to spruce up their resumes as they get ready to apply for admission into the Euro zone. This is what the IMF is forcing third world governments to do. And this is the road that deficit mania has now sent the United States and Japan down as well.

In Toronto, Canadian Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, host of the Alice in Wonderland, Mad Hatter Tea Party known as the G-20 meetings, prevailed upon his guests at this recently concluded gathering to sign a communiqué pledging to cut their budget deficits in half by 2013. New York Times reporter, David Leonhardt, summarized the outcome of the meetings as follows: “The world’s rich countries are now conducting a dangerous experiment. They are repeating an economic policy out of the 1930s — starting to cut spending and raise taxes before a recovery is assured — and hoping today’s situation is different enough to assure a different outcome.” But in the ways that matter the situation is not different, and therefore the outcome will not be different either.

This is economic madness! At best, global fiscal austerity will turn the Great Recession into a “lost decade” -- like the 1980s was for Latin American and the 1990s was for Japan -- but this time for most of the world. At worst, this madness risks sending the global economy spiraling back downward into a second Great Depression.

Instead of signing a mutual suicide pact to cut deficits that would do Jim Jones, the infamous cult leader in Guyana proud, the governments of the larger economies should have busied themselves at their G-20 meetings coordinating a global fiscal stimulus. They should have mutually pledged to run larger fiscal deficits until global unemployment is dramatically reduced. And instead of postponing global financial reform indefinitely, the G-8 should have worked overtime at their meetings to finalize measures to stop financial players from pushing interest rates on government bonds through the roof for smaller economies even when their economic “fundamentals” do not warrant such treatment. Moreover, the bitter medicine being spooned out by center left and right wing governments alike, draconian spending cuts and higher tax rates on lower and middle income households, will not only kill the patient – reducing production and increasing unemployment – they will not even cure the disease our leaders are fixated on – government debt. By aggravating the downward recessionary spiral fiscal austerity will only depress tax revenues further. Unless these austerity policies are reversed, working people will continue to suffer high unemployment, declines in take-home pay, cutbacks in social programs such as childcare and public education, declines in pensions, and reduced access to unemployment insurance.



Peter Bohmer is Professor of Political Economy at Evergreen State University in Olympia Washington. Robin Hahnel is Professor Emeritus at American University in Washington DC, and Visiting Professor of Economics at Portland State University in Portland Oregon.

From: Z Net - The Spirit Of Resistance Lives
URL: http://www.zcommunications.org/has-the- ... ter-bohmer
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Has The World Gone Mad?

Postby stefano » Tue Jul 13, 2010 8:13 am

Well there has been a fiscal stimulus of staggering dimensions - $1trn in Europe and a bit more in the US. Almost all of it went to banks, though.
User avatar
stefano
 
Posts: 2672
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Has The World Gone Mad?

Postby semper occultus » Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:34 am

the trouble with this sort of stuff is that we seem to have a fundamental split between advocates of fiscal easing - as exemplified above - & monetary easing that I've been trying to get my head around

the monetarist argument is that far from re-visiting the 1930's it is the fiscalists who are failing to learn the lessons of Japan in the 1990's.

I guess the "monetarist" economists ( e.g. Tim Congdon in the UK ) tend towards the centre-right & the fiscally ( e.g government ) driven side of the argument more to the centre-left , & so tend to find an inherent "good" in the idea of public-sector expenditure

seems like there's one group with screw-drivers & one with hammers arguing over whether this problem is a screw or a nail

the fact is - to this layman - that we are in the midst of a credit-crunch & that is basically a monetary problem - e.g. the vast quantities of "money" being created as credit by the financial institututions on the back of the over-valued assets in their balance sheets suddenley disappeared over-night.

what really does my head in is the fact that under monetary easing not only does the government not borrow but the stock of government debt actually falls as they create money & use it to buy back their existing government bonds from private financial institutions

this seems like a potential get-out-of-jail - a solution without crippling levels of debt to be paid-off by our grand-children ( hey we only finishing paying for World War II about 5 yrs ago ! ) albeit at the cost of some inflation !

Also if govt's go on a massive borrowing binge that's got, to some extent, crowd-out the private sector from being able to borrow & actually re-start growth in the private economy ?

this article copied from the End of the Wall St. Boom thread
seems a pretty clear exposition of the two positions

US-money-supply-plunges-at-1930s-pace-as-Obama-eyes-fresh-stimulus

Mr ( Larry ) Summers acknowledged in a speech this week that the eurozone crisis had shone a spotlight on the dangers of spiralling public debt. He said deficit spending delays the day of reckoning and leaves the US at the mercy of foreign creditors. Ultimately, "failure begets failure" in fiscal policy as the logic of compound interest does its worst.

However, Mr Summers said it would be "pennywise and pound foolish" to skimp just as the kindling wood of recovery starts to catch fire. He said fiscal policy comes into its own at at time when the economy "faces a liquidity trap" and the Fed is constrained by zero interest rates.

Mr Congdon said the Obama policy risks repeating the strategic errors of Japan, which pushed debt to dangerously high levels with one fiscal boost after another during its Lost Decade, instead of resorting to full-blown "Friedmanite" monetary stimulus.

"Fiscal policy does not work. The US has just tried the biggest fiscal experiment in history and it has failed. What matters is the quantity of money and in extremis that can be increased easily by quantititave easing. If the Fed doesn’t act, a double-dip recession is a virtual certainty," he said.

Mr Congdon said the dominant voices in US policy-making - Nobel laureates Paul Krugman and Joe Stiglitz, as well as Mr Summers and Fed chair Ben Bernanke - are all Keynesians of different stripes who "despise traditional monetary theory and have a religious aversion to any mention of the quantity of money". The great opus by Milton Friedman and Anna Schwartz - The Monetary History of the United States - has been left to gather dust.


this discussion about Paul Krugman -an arch-fiscalist - frames the debate slightly differently & comes to different ( seemingly much longer-term ) policy prescriptions
www.spiked-online.com

Pumping money into a fundamentally weak economy can only maintain momentum for a limited time. At some point inflationary forces are likely to emerge as a result of the huge amount of money being pumped into the world economy by finance ministries and central banks. Once that happens the drive to austerity looks set to become more overt.

A working model of the economy, in contrast to a one-sided outlook based on consumption, would need to be based on a critical examination of its defining characteristics. In Cowardly Capitalism (2001), I argued that there were two key features underlying the workings of the contemporary economy.

First, the productive economy of the West has atrophied.
The dynamic to growth of the productive side of the economy has become weak. This weakness was partially hidden by the artificial boost to consumption from the extension of credit in recent years. The relative dynamism of Asia, which subsidised consumption in the West with many billions of dollars of capital flows, also disguised the extent of Western stagnation. Indeed, the financial bubble can itself be understood as the result of an attempt to offset the tendencies to atrophy in the Western economies. Such measures worked for a while but their limits were reached in 2008.

Second, the pervasive culture of risk-aversion in contemporary society has given shape to the financial markets.
Financial markets have become more about transferring risks than channelling capital.
Instruments such as mortgage-backed securities and credit derivatives are primarily mechanisms to allow those involved to transfer risk. Yet they have provided the mechanism for ‘contagion’ from one financial party in a transaction to another. The attempt to diversify risk has, paradoxically, led to many financial institutions holding what have become known as ‘toxic’ assets.

More recently, an additional factor has become paramount: the ‘greening’ of capitalism. In the name of such vacuous concepts as ‘sustainability’, the expansion of production is being constrained. There is a strong cultural aversion to genuine innovation and dynamic growth. This pervasive mood in society has intensified the problem of economic atrophy still further.

Any solution to the economic crisis must take into account these characteristics of the contemporary economy. Crude models of the downturn inevitably lead to flawed solutions. Krugman’s proposals to bolster the sagging economy may be at the height of fashion, but they look destined to fail to counteract the descent into depression economics.

Daniel Ben-Ami is a journalist and author based in London. Visit his website here. An earlier version of this review appeared in Fund Strategy magazine.


the problem with all this being what do we do NOW before we've re-tooled the Western economy & re-designed the financial system !
User avatar
semper occultus
 
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: London,England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Has The World Gone Mad?

Postby stefano » Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:56 am

Fiscal stimulus, the way Keynes advocated it, reduces the number of unemployed and puts upward pressure on wages and prices. It's definitely not popular with bankers, who would rather stimulate debt-driven consumption. The right, particularly Hayek and Friedman, made massive efforts to discredit fiscal policy as inflationary and to influence the Tories to act against unions, blaming fiscal policy and strong unions for the recession in the UK in the 70s (although I actually think they have a point about the unions).

Conservatives don't like fiscal expansion because it drives inflation, so reducing the value of the savings of the comfortable. Monetary policy is uncontroversial from the point of view of the contented classes, as there is never a question of transferring tax wealth to the poor, even in the form of wages.

Also if govt's go on a massive borrowing binge that's got, to some extent, crowd-out the private sector from being able to borrow & actually re-start growth in the private economy ?
I don't think that's the problem; banks are massively capitalised and have plenty of money to lend. If companies show up with decent plans they will get the loans. But a solid business plan is dependent on consumer demand, which falls as unemployment goes up. You can't avoid the central question of employment.

I'm with Keynes.
User avatar
stefano
 
Posts: 2672
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:50 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Has The World Gone Mad?

Postby Simulist » Tue Jul 13, 2010 1:03 pm

Has The World Gone Mad?

Gone? More and more, it begins to appear that insanity runs pretty deep in this world, possibly permeating even the particles that make up this place.
"The most strongly enforced of all known taboos is the taboo against knowing who or what you really are behind the mask of your apparently separate, independent, and isolated ego."
    — Alan Watts
User avatar
Simulist
 
Posts: 4713
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:13 pm
Location: Here, and now.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Has The World Gone Mad?

Postby Alaya » Tue Jul 13, 2010 11:47 pm

I was going to start a thread over in the Lounge about this but it fits under this title.

So we are sitting at home this evening and we hear this horrendous screaming on the road accompanied by the sound of motorcycles. It sounds like somebody died so we head up the 100 yd. walk to the gate. Someone did die. An guy drove into a tree on his motorcycle.
He family was apparently following him because he was, someone said, 'not fit to drive'. This comment is the only comment we got from one of about ten family members who were there including about five children.

As we approached the road, I kept hearing someone screaming, "Someone go over and hold him". There is this guy who just died and nobody is near him and for that matter nobody is near anybody else either because they are all screaming into their cell phones. The kids are running around crying, their mothers are not with them. The only one who is being held is one who is too small to walk. A few of the very small kids are also screaming into their phones. My husband is trying to help, talk to some of them but they won't get off their phones. I go back to the house to get a blanket. The guy is just lying there with nobody near him. By the time I get back with the blanket, some has thought to cover him.

There was other way for us to help since nobody would even relate to us being there. The local sheriff showed up and we walked home.

The whole thing was so surreal.
The lack of human interaction and everyone holding a little piece of plastic shit like it was their fucking lifeboat. :cry:
User avatar
Alaya
 
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:30 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Has The World Gone Mad?

Postby Sweejak » Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:11 am

Alaya wrote:The lack of human interaction and everyone holding a little piece of plastic shit like it was their fucking lifeboat. :cry:


We approach a society
Without a society. -- Wallace Stevens, "Life on a Battleship"
User avatar
Sweejak
 
Posts: 3250
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2005 7:40 pm
Location: Border Region 5
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Has The World Gone Mad?

Postby norton ash » Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:23 am

Thread hijacked from psychonomics OT, but that story really is kinda chilling, Alaya.

It's like Peter Sellers in Being There trying to make people go away with his TV remote. Instead of doing something useful or helpful or sane, everyone reaches madly for what is a non-lifeline.

Bury your face in mother's electron skirt.
Zen horse
User avatar
norton ash
 
Posts: 4067
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:46 pm
Location: Canada
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Has The World Gone Mad?

Postby Alaya » Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:38 am

Swee, thanks for the quote by one of my favorite poets.

Norton, sorry, I must improve my thread starting skills.

Was feeling distraught and plopped it down sort of anywhere.
User avatar
Alaya
 
Posts: 522
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:30 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Has The World Gone Mad?

Postby Nordic » Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:10 am

Wow, Alaya, that reads like a bad and bizarre dream.

Yikes.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: Has The World Gone Mad?

Postby Twyla LaSarc » Wed Jul 14, 2010 5:02 pm

@ Alaya:

I'm sorry you had to witness that. It sounds horrible.

As for the relatives on the cell phones, they had all let him drive home despite his obvious impairment. Perhaps they were all contacting their lawyers...
“The Radium Water Worked Fine until His Jaw Came Off”
User avatar
Twyla LaSarc
 
Posts: 1040
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 2:50 pm
Location: On the 8th hole
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Has The World Gone Mad?

Postby No_Baseline » Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:13 pm

I couldn't agree more, my friend...
Simulist wrote:
Has The World Gone Mad?

Gone? More and more, it begins to appear that insanity runs pretty deep in this world, possibly permeating even the particles that make up this place.
User avatar
No_Baseline
 
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:40 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Has The World Gone Mad?

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:56 pm

Today at work I had an article scrapped because it was "too Socialism" -- it was simply an examination of how "jobs" have been created in the past, and how to actually get out of a recession. My conclusion was that deficits were not the problem, but rather how that money was being spent. An investment into public works, US infrastructure, subsidizing small businesses like we do multinationals, and education/job training would be the best path to take, according to recent history.

This concept is apparently deviating too far from the pale..."too Socialism"...so now I'm re-hashing some lies from the US Chamber of Commerce for more palatable content for Mormons, Creationists, Law of Attraction fetishists, Ayn Rand disciples and CNBC cowboys.

But hey, enough about my stellar career, right? The real question is, am I wrong? ...or is public works spending, small biz incentives and infrastructure re-investment the way to go for actual job creation?
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Has The World Gone Mad?

Postby Pele'sDaughter » Wed Jul 14, 2010 7:31 pm

As I see it, you're not only correct but these projects NEED to be done. The infrastructure is crumbling as we write, and it isn't going to repair itself.
Don't believe anything they say.
And at the same time,
Don't believe that they say anything without a reason.
---Immanuel Kant
User avatar
Pele'sDaughter
 
Posts: 1917
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 11:45 am
Location: Texas
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Has The World Gone Mad?

Postby Iamwhomiam » Thu Jul 15, 2010 1:33 am

You are correct WRex. A comprehensive public works jobs program like the CCC would do much good and produce personal income, consumption and bolster federal and local tax revenue.

Sorry to learn of your horrible experience, Alaya.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 158 guests