Page 1 of 2

Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders

PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 6:42 pm
by justdrew
Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders
Mysterious and possibly nefarious trading algorithms are operating every minute of every day in the nation's stock exchanges.

What they do doesn't show up in Google Finance, let alone in the pages of the Wall Street Journal. No one really knows how they operate or why. But over the past few weeks, Nanex, a data services firm has dragged some of the odder algorithm specimens into the light.

The trading bots visualized in the stock charts in this story aren't doing anything that could be construed to help the market. Unknown entities for unknown reasons are sending thousands of orders a second through the electronic stock exchanges with no intent to actually trade. Often, the buy or sell prices that they are offering are so far from the market price that there's no way they'd ever be part of a trade. The bots sketch out odd patterns with their orders, leaving patterns in the data that are largely invisible to market participants.

In fact, it's hard to figure out exactly what they're up to or gauge their impact. Are they doing something illicit? If so, what? Or do the patterns emerge spontaneously, a kind of mechanical accident? If so, why? No matter what the answers to these questions turn out to be, we're witnessing a market phenomenon that is not easily explained. And it's really bizarre.

It's thanks to Nanex, the data services firm, that we know what their handiwork looks like at all. In the aftermath of the May 6 "flash crash," which saw the Dow plunge nearly 1,000 points in just a few minutes, the company spent weeks digging into their market recordings, replaying the day's trades and trying to understand what happened. Most stock charts show, at best, detail down to the one-minute scale, but Nanex's data shows much finer slices of time. The company's software engineer Jeffrey Donovan stared and stared at the data. He began to think that he could see odd patterns emerge from the numbers. He had a hunch that if he plotted the action around a stock sequentially at the millisecond range, he'd find something. When he tried it, he was blown away by the pattern. He called it "The Knife." This is what he saw:

Image

"When I pulled up that first chart, we saw 'the knife,' we said, that's certainly algorithmic and that is weird. We continued to refine our software, honing the algorithms we use to find this stuff," Donovan told me. Now that he knows where and how to look, he could spend all day for weeks just picking out these patterns in the market data. The examples that he posts online are just the ones that look the most interesting, but at any given moment, some kind of bot is making moves like this in the stock exchange.

"We probably get 10 stocks in any 10 minutes where we see something like this," Donovan said. "It's happening all the time."

-- more at link above --


http://www.nanex.net/FlashCrash/CCircleDay.html

In our original Flash Crash Analysis report, we dedicated a section to an observed phenomena we termed "Quote Stuffing", in which bursts of quotes (at very high rates) with extremely unusual characteristics were observed.

As we continue to monitor the markets for evidence of Quote Stuffing and Strange Sequences (Crop Circles), we find that there are dozens if not hundreds of examples to choose from on any given day. As such, this page will be updated often with charts demonstrating this activity.

The common theme with the charts shown on this page is they are obviously all generated in code and are algorithmic. Some demonstrate bizarre price or size cycling, some demonstrate large burst of quotes in extremely short time frames and some will demonstrate both. In most cases these sequences are from a single exchange with no other exchange quoting in the same time frame.

Re: Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders

PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 6:54 pm
by 82_28
Hmmm. Very interesting. Not that I understand it all that much. It seems like it's a fraction of a penny deducted from perhaps the millions of transactions that happen every second and is passed on. Nobody notices the fraction of a penny missing per fraction of a second and it get distributed widely enough that it doesn't appear to be that big of a deal. It's like drilling down on the wave form of a synth sound.

Re: Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders

PostPosted: Thu Aug 05, 2010 6:57 pm
by Wombaticus Rex
Thanks for this! Very important for a project I got going.

Re: Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders

PostPosted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:06 am
by wintler2
Thanks justdrew, fascinating stuff. The article seemed to me to write it all off as a coincidence:
For now, Donovan plans to keep putting out the charts, which he calls "crop circles," of the odd trading algorithms at work. That's an apt name for the visualizations we see of this alien world of bot trading. And it certainly gets at a central mystery surrounding them: if trading firms aren't sending out these orders, how are they getting into the market?

On the quantitative trading forum, Nuclear Phynance, the consensus on the patterns seemed to be that they simply just emerged. They were the result of "a dynamical system that can enter oscillatory/unstable modes of behaviour," as one member put it. If so, what you see here really is just the afterscent of robot traders gliding through the green-on-black darkness of the financial system on their way from one real trade to another.

which is not something i can believe. Real coincidences don't have linear edges.

Re: Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders

PostPosted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:28 am
by justdrew
wintler2 wrote:Thanks justdrew, fascinating stuff. The article seemed to me to write it all off as a coincidence:
For now, Donovan plans to keep putting out the charts, which he calls "crop circles," of the odd trading algorithms at work. That's an apt name for the visualizations we see of this alien world of bot trading. And it certainly gets at a central mystery surrounding them: if trading firms aren't sending out these orders, how are they getting into the market?

On the quantitative trading forum, Nuclear Phynance, the consensus on the patterns seemed to be that they simply just emerged. They were the result of "a dynamical system that can enter oscillatory/unstable modes of behaviour," as one member put it. If so, what you see here really is just the afterscent of robot traders gliding through the green-on-black darkness of the financial system on their way from one real trade to another.

which is not something i can believe. Real coincidences don't have linear edges.


if this were simply emergent behavior... wouldn't it be clear that they are being sent by trading firms?

"...if trading firms aren't sending out these orders, how are they getting into the market?"

If it's really true that it's not clear who's making these orders, it seems like the most probable explanation is that the market itself is inserting them.

Re: Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders

PostPosted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:34 am
by smiths
a ghost in the machine?

Re: Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders

PostPosted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:39 am
by wintler2
The market itself ? Do you mean the automated software platform, or..?

Imho it is much more likely that some actors in the market have nontransparent access, and are using it to work prices up or to weaken them, at little cost or risk.

Re: Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders

PostPosted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 12:45 am
by justdrew
smiths wrote:a ghost in the machine?


ghost perhaps, but probably only like the ghosts in scooby-doo always turned out to be. Let's hope some meddling kids wander through.

I still think high speed trading should simply be banned.
and that every issued share should have a unique serial number, a 64bit GUID.
no given share should be able to trade more than once per day.
this would automatically prevent so many abuses.
so trades would occur at the end of each day and be resolved in some auction fashion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auctions#Types_of_auction

wintler2 wrote:The market itself ? Do you mean the automated software platform, or..?

Imho it is much more likely that some actors in the market have nontransparent access, and are using it to work prices up or to weaken them, at little cost or risk.


yeah, I'm thinking the people who run the electronic trading floor would be responsible. Why would they tolerate non-transparent orders in their market, that would be major long running hacking were that going on. Or maybe it's from a government mandated secret backdoor?

Re: Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders

PostPosted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 1:09 am
by anothershamus
I think I got all this the right way on the quote. Whole article here @ Cryptogon.com

As near as I can figure, there are bots working the system and someone is making or laundering a bunch of money with these trades.

Like Kevin says, 'What’s even more fascinating is that millions of people are trusting their financial futures to this hyped up game of pong that has been left to run in autonomous mode." Or in manipulated bot mode, designed to screw all the plebes and make more money for all the folks with all the money.

http://cryptogon.com/?p=16829

Cisco’s Sub Second Melt Up and Identifying Crop Circles in the High Frequency Market Data
August 5th, 2010

Last week, Cisco (CSCO) was halted because the new “circuit breaker” rule kicked in. The price had moved more than 10% in five minutes (ABC/Reuters):

Trading in Cisco Systems Inc shares was briefly halted on Thursday after triggering a circuit breaker.

According to the Nasdaq website, trading was paused due to a move of 10 percent or more in Cisco’s price in a five-minute period.

Cisco fell 1.7 percent at $23 in mid-day trading.

Thomson Reuters data showed a single trade at $26, which would have represented a more than 10 percent move. The halt started at around 10:41 a.m. EDT (14:41 GMT), and trading resumed five minutes later.

NYSE Amex, where the trade occurred, said in an e-mail that all trades will stand after it had reviewed those executed at 10:41 a.m. between $23.67 and $26.

Unless you know a bit about how Cisco behaves in the market, you might not have thought much more about this.

I used to watch Cisco all day and it just doesn’t move violently like that. CSCO is an extremely liquid stock. The daily volume (3 month average) is around 60 million shares. It meanders in slow, nauseating grind, a penny at a time. I thought I’d bring up a minute chart to see how the action played out during this halt event.

There was just one whacked out upper candle shadow on the minute chart; it actually looked like bad data, but it wasn’t.

I went to a 30 second interval. Same weird upper candle shadow. Ten second. Same thing again. Five second. Two second.

One second, and still, just one upper shadow to $26.

“What the… This happened in under a second?!” I mumbled to myself in total disbelief. The circuit breaker is meant to kick in on moves that happen over five minutes. What all the news about this incident on Cisco fails to mention is that the circuit breaking move happened in under a second.

So, I was looking at a one second chart that contained the whole incident! Here it is:

Cisco Halt Event - One Second Interval

Cisco Halt Event - One Second Interval

Image

I had to drill down further, so I brought it up in tick.

Tick data shows us every change to the best bid and ask as well as the volume. Tick data has no fixed time component. The number of ticks that occur in a second, minute or hour depends on the instrument in question and the activity at any given time.

For mere mortals, tick data is the most detailed data available, and this is what you see below (Data: IQFeed, Charts: MultiCharts):

Cisco Halt Event - One Tick Interval



Cisco, Tick Interval

Image

There’s a lot of room for the machines to iterate inside of one second, and so, for a few fractions of a second last Thursday, all Hell broke loose.

CSCO, the stock that normally grinds pennies for minutes or hours at a time, gapped violently (almost three bucks) higher as sell side liquidity disappeared. It didn’t just happen once, or twice inside that fateful second. It was the third gap higher that was far enough to trigger the kill switch.

This was no normal ramp job, with the price moving sharply higher in an orderly way. The sell side liquidity disappeared several levels deep, for some number of cycles, inside this second, and someone’s bot just kept trying to find shares higher and higher, until the exchange pulled the plug.

When, exactly, did this happen?

Well, that’s an interesting question. We’re looking inside the one second bar that ended 7/29/2010 10:41:34. I can’t be more precise than that because my tick data is only time stamped with seconds.


I don’t know who or what took out the sell side of the CSCO book, during those fractions of a second last week, but if this can happen to a stock like Cisco… You should be extremely concerned if you have more than pocket lint riding on stock market. This isn’t a functional market, where buyers and sellers are efficiently determining prices by their activities. This is machines juggling chainsaws.

The only reason I noticed was because a wheel came off the cart. Keep in mind, however, that this kind of thing is happening in all electronic markets, every trading day.

Now, let’s turn to the The Atlantic piece, “Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders,” which I’ve referenced below. A firm called Nanex, LLC. provides a set of tools that are used for developing trading systems that are capable of operating in timeframes measured in nanoseconds. Nanex started finding wild patterns of activity in these tiny slices of time. It’s a fascinating article, mainly because nobody has any good explanations as to what the Hell is really going on here. (Don’t miss Nanex’s Crop Circle of the Day – Quote Stuffing and Strange Sequences page.here:http://www.nanex.net/FlashCrash/CCircleDay.html )

What’s even more fascinating is that millions of people are trusting their financial futures to this hyped up game of pong that has been left to run in autonomous mode.

Re: Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders

PostPosted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:25 am
by justdrew
another possibility would be that Market Makers use this in some way to fiddle with the auction process.

http://traderfeed.blogspot.com/2008/10/introduction-to-trading-markets-auction.html

from 2000...
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/stock-exchange-forced-to-defend-closing-auction-procedure-711855.html
Technical analysts, who divine market trends largely by monitoring closing prices, are warning that the distortions could make day-to-day comparisons meaningless.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_maker
Most stock exchanges operate on a "matched bargain" or "order driven" basis. In such a system there are no designated or official market makers, but market makers nevertheless exist. When a buyer's bid price meets a seller's offer price or vice versa, the stock exchange's matching system decides that a deal has been executed.

(so can a decided upon match be repudiated by either party? or is the money and shares already in the hands of the market at that point?)

New York

In the United States, the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and American Stock Exchange (AMEX), among others, have Designated Market Makers, formerly known as "specialists", who act as the official market maker for a given security. The market makers provide a required amount of liquidity to the security's market, and take the other side of trades when there are short-term buy-and-sell-side imbalances in customer orders. This helps prevent excess volatility, and in return, the specialist is granted various informational and trade execution advantages.

Other U.S. exchanges, most prominently the NASDAQ Stock Exchange, employ several competing official market makers in a security. These market makers are required to maintain two-sided markets during exchange hours and are obligated to buy and sell at their displayed bids and offers. They typically do not receive the trading advantages a specialist does, but they do get some, such as the ability to naked short a stock, i.e., selling it without borrowing it. In most situations, only official market makers are permitted to engage in naked shorting. Recent changes to the rules have explicitly banned naked shorting by options market makers.

There are over two thousand market makers in the USA and over a hundred in Canada.


so.. on the NYSE I bet all high-speed traders are also designated market makers aren't they...

from 2003
http://www.financetech.com/featured/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=14702074
A locked market occurs when the bid, or price to buy, say $20, is the same as the offer to sell at $20, thus a trade cannot take place because there is no spread. However, under most circumstances, internal rules and algorithms auto-execute such trades to avoid locking the markets. But across unlinked systems, such as ADF and SuperMontage, locks occur when matching bids and offers can't interact.


this whole thing is so screwed up. I'd stick with savings bonds I think.

Re: Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders

PostPosted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 6:55 am
by wintler2
Savings bonds! You panglossian you, i'm banking on watertanks, solar passive housing and a good name myself.

Re: Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders

PostPosted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 7:32 am
by stefano
It's the whole 'market maker' concept that's dodgy. I don't understand it all that well (eg. do you need to go through a designated market maker if you have a block to sell?). In return for a promise to maintain liquidity, big operators control the supposed market to a frightening extent, to the extent where they're able to make sell-side supply on a big ticker disappear... Some free market.

Re: Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders

PostPosted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 5:45 pm
by hanshan
anothershamus wrote:I think I got all this the right way on the quote. Whole article here @ Cryptogon.com

As near as I can figure, there are bots working the system and someone is making or laundering a bunch of money with these trades.

Like Kevin says, 'What’s even more fascinating is that millions of people are trusting their financial futures to this hyped up game of pong that has been left to run in autonomous mode." Or in manipulated bot mode, designed to screw all the plebes and make more money for all the folks with all the money.

http://cryptogon.com/?p=16829

Cisco’s Sub Second Melt Up and Identifying Crop Circles in the High Frequency Market Data
August 5th, 2010

Last week, Cisco (CSCO) was halted because the new “circuit breaker” rule kicked in. The price had moved more than 10% in five minutes (ABC/Reuters):

Trading in Cisco Systems Inc shares was briefly halted on Thursday after triggering a circuit breaker.

According to the Nasdaq website, trading was paused due to a move of 10 percent or more in Cisco’s price in a five-minute period.

Cisco fell 1.7 percent at $23 in mid-day trading.

Thomson Reuters data showed a single trade at $26, which would have represented a more than 10 percent move. The halt started at around 10:41 a.m. EDT (14:41 GMT), and trading resumed five minutes later.

NYSE Amex, where the trade occurred, said in an e-mail that all trades will stand after it had reviewed those executed at 10:41 a.m. between $23.67 and $26.

Unless you know a bit about how Cisco behaves in the market, you might not have thought much more about this.

I used to watch Cisco all day and it just doesn’t move violently like that. CSCO is an extremely liquid stock. The daily volume (3 month average) is around 60 million shares. It meanders in slow, nauseating grind, a penny at a time. I thought I’d bring up a minute chart to see how the action played out during this halt event.

There was just one whacked out upper candle shadow on the minute chart; it actually looked like bad data, but it wasn’t.

I went to a 30 second interval. Same weird upper candle shadow. Ten second. Same thing again. Five second. Two second.

One second, and still, just one upper shadow to $26.

“What the… This happened in under a second?!” I mumbled to myself in total disbelief. The circuit breaker is meant to kick in on moves that happen over five minutes. What all the news about this incident on Cisco fails to mention is that the circuit breaking move happened in under a second.

So, I was looking at a one second chart that contained the whole incident! Here it is:

Cisco Halt Event - One Second Interval

Cisco Halt Event - One Second Interval

Image

I had to drill down further, so I brought it up in tick.

Tick data shows us every change to the best bid and ask as well as the volume. Tick data has no fixed time component. The number of ticks that occur in a second, minute or hour depends on the instrument in question and the activity at any given time.

For mere mortals, tick data is the most detailed data available, and this is what you see below (Data: IQFeed, Charts: MultiCharts):

Cisco Halt Event - One Tick Interval



Cisco, Tick Interval

Image

There’s a lot of room for the machines to iterate inside of one second, and so, for a few fractions of a second last Thursday, all Hell broke loose.

CSCO, the stock that normally grinds pennies for minutes or hours at a time, gapped violently (almost three bucks) higher as sell side liquidity disappeared. It didn’t just happen once, or twice inside that fateful second. It was the third gap higher that was far enough to trigger the kill switch.

This was no normal ramp job, with the price moving sharply higher in an orderly way. The sell side liquidity disappeared several levels deep, for some number of cycles, inside this second, and someone’s bot just kept trying to find shares higher and higher, until the exchange pulled the plug.

When, exactly, did this happen?

Well, that’s an interesting question. We’re looking inside the one second bar that ended 7/29/2010 10:41:34. I can’t be more precise than that because my tick data is only time stamped with seconds.


I don’t know who or what took out the sell side of the CSCO book, during those fractions of a second last week, but if this can happen to a stock like Cisco… You should be extremely concerned if you have more than pocket lint riding on stock market. This isn’t a functional market, where buyers and sellers are efficiently determining prices by their activities. This is machines juggling chainsaws.

The only reason I noticed was because a wheel came off the cart. Keep in mind, however, that this kind of thing is happening in all electronic markets, every trading day.

Now, let’s turn to the The Atlantic piece, “Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders,” which I’ve referenced below. A firm called Nanex, LLC. provides a set of tools that are used for developing trading systems that are capable of operating in timeframes measured in nanoseconds. Nanex started finding wild patterns of activity in these tiny slices of time. It’s a fascinating article, mainly because nobody has any good explanations as to what the Hell is really going on here. (Don’t miss Nanex’s Crop Circle of the Day – Quote Stuffing and Strange Sequences page.here:http://www.nanex.net/FlashCrash/CCircleDay.html )

What’s even more fascinating is that millions of people are trusting their financial futures to this hyped up game of pong that has been left to run in autonomous mode.



very cool, tx, as


...

Re: Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders

PostPosted: Fri Aug 06, 2010 5:48 pm
by hanshan
anothershamus wrote:I think I got all this the right way on the quote. Whole article here @ Cryptogon.com

As near as I can figure, there are bots working the system and someone is making or laundering a bunch of money with these trades.

Like Kevin says, 'What’s even more fascinating is that millions of people are trusting their financial futures to this hyped up game of pong that has been left to run in autonomous mode." Or in manipulated bot mode, designed to screw all the plebes and make more money for all the folks with all the money.

http://cryptogon.com/?p=16829

Cisco’s Sub Second Melt Up and Identifying Crop Circles in the High Frequency Market Data
August 5th, 2010

Last week, Cisco (CSCO) was halted because the new “circuit breaker” rule kicked in. The price had moved more than 10% in five minutes (ABC/Reuters):

Trading in Cisco Systems Inc shares was briefly halted on Thursday after triggering a circuit breaker.

According to the Nasdaq website, trading was paused due to a move of 10 percent or more in Cisco’s price in a five-minute period.

Cisco fell 1.7 percent at $23 in mid-day trading.

Thomson Reuters data showed a single trade at $26, which would have represented a more than 10 percent move. The halt started at around 10:41 a.m. EDT (14:41 GMT), and trading resumed five minutes later.

NYSE Amex, where the trade occurred, said in an e-mail that all trades will stand after it had reviewed those executed at 10:41 a.m. between $23.67 and $26.

Unless you know a bit about how Cisco behaves in the market, you might not have thought much more about this.

I used to watch Cisco all day and it just doesn’t move violently like that. CSCO is an extremely liquid stock. The daily volume (3 month average) is around 60 million shares. It meanders in slow, nauseating grind, a penny at a time. I thought I’d bring up a minute chart to see how the action played out during this halt event.

There was just one whacked out upper candle shadow on the minute chart; it actually looked like bad data, but it wasn’t.

I went to a 30 second interval. Same weird upper candle shadow. Ten second. Same thing again. Five second. Two second.

One second, and still, just one upper shadow to $26.

“What the… This happened in under a second?!” I mumbled to myself in total disbelief. The circuit breaker is meant to kick in on moves that happen over five minutes. What all the news about this incident on Cisco fails to mention is that the circuit breaking move happened in under a second.

So, I was looking at a one second chart that contained the whole incident! Here it is:

Cisco Halt Event - One Second Interval

Cisco Halt Event - One Second Interval

Image

I had to drill down further, so I brought it up in tick.

Tick data shows us every change to the best bid and ask as well as the volume. Tick data has no fixed time component. The number of ticks that occur in a second, minute or hour depends on the instrument in question and the activity at any given time.

For mere mortals, tick data is the most detailed data available, and this is what you see below (Data: IQFeed, Charts: MultiCharts):

Cisco Halt Event - One Tick Interval



Cisco, Tick Interval

Image

There’s a lot of room for the machines to iterate inside of one second, and so, for a few fractions of a second last Thursday, all Hell broke loose.

CSCO, the stock that normally grinds pennies for minutes or hours at a time, gapped violently (almost three bucks) higher as sell side liquidity disappeared. It didn’t just happen once, or twice inside that fateful second. It was the third gap higher that was far enough to trigger the kill switch.

This was no normal ramp job, with the price moving sharply higher in an orderly way. The sell side liquidity disappeared several levels deep, for some number of cycles, inside this second, and someone’s bot just kept trying to find shares higher and higher, until the exchange pulled the plug.

When, exactly, did this happen?

Well, that’s an interesting question. We’re looking inside the one second bar that ended 7/29/2010 10:41:34. I can’t be more precise than that because my tick data is only time stamped with seconds.


I don’t know who or what took out the sell side of the CSCO book, during those fractions of a second last week, but if this can happen to a stock like Cisco… You should be extremely concerned if you have more than pocket lint riding on stock market. This isn’t a functional market, where buyers and sellers are efficiently determining prices by their activities. This is machines juggling chainsaws.

The only reason I noticed was because a wheel came off the cart. Keep in mind, however, that this kind of thing is happening in all electronic markets, every trading day.

Now, let’s turn to the The Atlantic piece, “Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders,” which I’ve referenced below. A firm called Nanex, LLC. provides a set of tools that are used for developing trading systems that are capable of operating in timeframes measured in nanoseconds. Nanex started finding wild patterns of activity in these tiny slices of time. It’s a fascinating article, mainly because nobody has any good explanations as to what the Hell is really going on here. (Don’t miss Nanex’s Crop Circle of the Day – Quote Stuffing and Strange Sequences page.here:http://www.nanex.net/FlashCrash/CCircleDay.html )

What’s even more fascinating is that millions of people are trusting their financial futures to this hyped up game of pong that has been left to run in autonomous mode.



very cool, tx, as


...

Re: Market Data Firm Spots the Tracks of Bizarre Robot Traders

PostPosted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:47 pm
by Luther Blissett
Out of every single last thing discussed here, markets are the one that I have absolutely no ability to follow. I have a meager, newborn 403(B) and live pretty much paycheck to paycheck.

Can someone provide some links that might explain market functionality in a really elementary way that might lead an intuitive soul like myself to understanding a little of this thread?