Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
"It may seem incredible that anyone can be mistaken about being abused, but there have been countless cases where claims were proven to be false. In the 1980s and 1990s there was a global epidemic of false satanic abuse claims from children, typically thanks to leading questioning from misguided social workers. A 1994 UK government report into 84 satanic abuse claims found that none was supported by physical evidence, such as scars left on alleged torture victims or forensic evidence from rooms that were supposedly the sites of multiple murders."
https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg ... -is-risky/
M F Abernathy » Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:15 pm wrote:
**********************************************************************************
F M S F O U N D A T I O N N E W S L E T T E R
SUMMER 2010 Vol. 19 No. 3
**********************************************************************************
The FMSF Newsletter will be published 4 times in 2010
by the False Memory Syndrome Foundation & delivered electronically.
Those without access to the Internet should contact the Foundation.
**********************************************************************************
.
@mike_salter
The False Memory Syndrome Foundation is officially dissolved tomorrow. It was launched 27 years ago, claiming that adults disclosing child sexual abuse were suffering from a “syndrome” of vivid false memories of abuse.
4:23 PM - 29 Dec 2019
No such “syndrome” exists – it is, ironically enough, a false syndrome. The organization arose to contest law reform in the United States that expanded opportunities for sexual abuse survivors to pursue civil or criminal charges, and then quickly spread to other countries.
Much of the intellectual heft of the “false memory syndrome” movement came from FMSF-aligned academics and lawyers who were paid to defend men accused of CSA in court. The FMSF played a central role in matching accused abusers with defence lawyers and expert witnesses.
This obvious conflict of interest went largely unchallenged by journalists at the time. The FMSF catalyzed a 180 degree turn in global media coverage of CSA so that, by the mid-1990s, news stories about CSA focused predominantly on the threat of false allegations.
If you are interested, @jennykitzinger published a fantastic book in 2004 examining media sympathy and journalistic advocacy for the “false memory” movement throughout the 1990s.
https://www.plutobooks.com/9781783715633/framing-abuse/
Almost every CSA survivor that I’ve ever interviewed has discussed the destructive impact of widespread media coverage of “false memories” on their lives.
The notion that CSA memories are particularly untrustworthy has become a widespread “common sense” that destabilizes police investigations and prosecutions, and obstructs access to healthcare and social supports.
Once it was successfully mobilised against trauma survivors, the notion of "false memories" has been used to undermine other truth claims by vulnerable groups, including survivors of the Stolen Generations and ethnic cleansing.
The field of trauma therapy is only now emerging from the culture of fear and silence engendered by the FMSF and their journalist and academic champions.
By all means, trauma practice should be scrutinized and held to the highest standards. But that scrutiny should also be extended to lobby groups of people accused of abusing children, and lawyers and academics earning hundreds of thousands of dollars defending them in court.
The FMSF closes with a whimper rather than a bang. They have been inactive for many years, with almost half of their advisory board deceased, and many of those still alive in their 80s and 90s.
But the legacy of their lies and distortions remain, alongside unanswered questions about media ethics and academic accountability.
MORE AT LINK
https://twitter.com/mike_salter/status/ ... 4821001216
@jjfreydcourage
Jennifer Freyd Retweeted Michael Salter
I do not think I exaggerate when I say I was the first target of the FSMF. Michael Salter's thread about this group is terrific. I would like to add a few comments of my own, so I am starting my own thread. I begin by RTing Salter:
Jennifer Freyd added,
Michael Salter
Verified account @mike_salter
The False Memory Syndrome Foundation is officially dissolved tomorrow. It was launched 27 years ago, claiming that adults disclosing child sexual abuse were suffering from a “syndrome” of vivid false memories of abuse.
Show this thread
7:00 AM - 30 Dec 2019
Jennifer J. Freyd, PhD
Professor of Psychology, University of Oregon
Visiting Scholar at Stanford Medical School
Faculty Affiliate of the VMware Women's Leadership Innovation Lab at Stanford University
‘Aggressive media that demand the victim/survivor reveal their emotional wounds’
For almost a decade Douglas Misicko using several aliases (including Douglas Mesner and Lucien Greaves) has harassed groups helping child abuse, rape and trauma survivors. He has also harassed groups providing research in support of child abuse, rape and trauma survivors.
In 2013, he and others created a group called the Satanic Temple. One part of this group is called the Grey Faction. The Grey Faction states they “invade” conferences. These conferences are provided to help and educate child abuse, rape and trauma survivors and their helpers.
Their representatives that invade these conferences misrepresent their reasons for attending these conferences. They film people at these conferences without permission and publish these films without the permission of those filmed. The Grey Faction repeatedly misrepresents the research and statements of the people at these conferences. It uses repeated ad hominem attacks against child abuse and trauma researchers without rebutting their research or stories.
Before becoming a crusader to inject Satanism into America's elementary schools, the Satanic Temple's founder was a particularly aggressive front man for the False Memory Syndrome Foundation, which is closely linked to CSICOP, or the Center for Inquiry, as it's now known.
He lectured on the topic of "false memory" at conventions and went on the attack against victims' advocacy groups, attempting to drive them out of business.
Perhaps the False Memory people didn't get the memo that an avowed Satanist probably wasn't the best public face for a movement who often find themselves trying to debunk accusations of Satanic ritual abuse.
A Satanist who was somehow affiliated with the extremely-controversial Process Church of the Final Judgment-- linked over the years to the Manson Family, the Son of Sam shootings and the Cropsey child murders-- using their brand identity on the blog (at process.org) where he did his FMSF activism.
But more likely they just didn't give a shit.
The FMSF grew in part out of CSICOP's work on attempting to debunk accusations of abuse that became epidemic in the 80s and 90s. But they may not have been well-positioned for such a task, given who was in charge of their "human sexuality" desk:
Vern Bullough --Dean of Natural and Social Science at State University, New York, who is a CSICOP Board member. Vern Bullough is also listed as a board member of Paidika, the Dutch paedophile magazine
Upon learning from Michael Salter, a researcher in the area of sexual abuse and complex trauma, about the dissolution of the FMSF, survivors celebrated the end of the organization.
survivors celebrated the end of the organization.
...
Deborah Davis and Elizabeth Loftus
Experts on human memory
Weinstein’s experts on memory — who co-authored a paper for The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology titled "Remembering Disputed Sexual Encounters: A New Frontier for Witness Memory Research" — will be allowed to testify but won’t be permitted to speak on issues of memory specifically tied to sexual interactions and "the phenomenon known as 'voluntary unwanted sex.'" They defined it in court papers as "sex that is undesired, but that the person chooses to engage in" and argued it’s likely to lead to confusion over consent. Their testimony will be limited to general functions of memory. Davis, a psychology professor at University of Nevada, Reno, has served as a jury consultant for 20 years, and her expertise includes memory, interrogation and issues of consent. UC Irvine professor Loftus testified in Bill Cosby’s first trial — on the comedian’s side — and in trials for Martha Stewart, O.J. Simpson and Ted Bundy.
Deborah Davis (left), Elizabeth Loftus
Courtesy of subject; Don Tormey/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
Elvis » Thu Jan 09, 2020 2:39 pm wrote:Elizabeth Loftus to testify in Harvey Weinstein criminal trial.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/lists ... al-1266395...
Deborah Davis and Elizabeth Loftus
Experts on human memory
Weinstein’s experts on memory — who co-authored a paper for The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology titled "Remembering Disputed Sexual Encounters: A New Frontier for Witness Memory Research" — will be allowed to testify but won’t be permitted to speak on issues of memory specifically tied to sexual interactions and "the phenomenon known as 'voluntary unwanted sex.'" They defined it in court papers as "sex that is undesired, but that the person chooses to engage in" and argued it’s likely to lead to confusion over consent. Their testimony will be limited to general functions of memory. Davis, a psychology professor at University of Nevada, Reno, has served as a jury consultant for 20 years, and her expertise includes memory, interrogation and issues of consent. UC Irvine professor Loftus testified in Bill Cosby’s first trial — on the comedian’s side — and in trials for Martha Stewart, O.J. Simpson and Ted Bundy.
Deborah Davis (left), Elizabeth Loftus
Courtesy of subject; Don Tormey/Los Angeles Times via Getty Images
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests