War on Drugs, Money Laundry and Plan (Destroy) Mexico

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Drug War: Covert Money, Power & Policy: Viva Zapata

Postby American Dream » Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:16 pm

http://www.drugwar.com/vivazapata.shtm

Drug War: Covert Money, Power & Policy: Viva Zapata



In 1978 the CIA's Confederación Anticomunista Latina, CAL, adopted "the Banzer Plan" for the coordinated death-squad tracking of "liberation theology" priests and nuns throughout Latin America. This was an extension of the CIA's Operation Condor. The populist priests and nuns of Catholic Action, for instance, had become a formidable force in Guatemala, bordering southern Mexico. Catholic Action organized at least 150,000 peasants into rural coops that provided economic autonomy, the very last thing that the fascists wanted to see. Catholic Action's "Christian Base Communities" stressed education and consciousness-raising, and cooperated with one another throughout the highlands. They presented an alternative to both the guerrillas and the government, and, in many cases, peacefully supported the political goals of the guerrillas.

Catholic Action stood in opposition to a Latin Church too often ruled by the likes of Archbishop Casariego, who, in a famous photo, blessed U.S. military equipment for the Zacapa mass-murder campaign. During the 70's, throughout Latin America, the local Catholic hierarchy was pushed into active support of "the Church of the Poor" by the genuine Christian mysticism of its working class priests and nuns. The most famous convert to social activism was El Salvador's Archbishop Oscar Romero, whose support for the poor was deep and genuine. The Maryknoll Sisters have also proven to be particularly effective international freedom fighters who have indeed brought glory upon the Church. Many have been murdered by CAL death squads.

Overseeing the Banzer Plan in Mexico was the Bolivian CIA station chief who was Felix Rodriguez' boss when they hunted down Ché Guevara, Hugh Murray. In Mexico, Murray operated as a DEA agent. He had been recruited into the DEA to work with his old CIA buddy Lucien Conein, then running Nixon's covert DEA operations. "The Federal Bureau of Narcotics provided cover for the Central Intelligence Agency since just about the day it was formed," writes criminologist Prof. Alan Block. Murray's two chief Mexican contacts, DFS chief Miguel Nazar Haro and Mexico City Police Chief Arturo Durazo Moreno, both made a fortune in the drug trade, and both ran fascist death squads.

The DFS, the Federal Security Directorate, Mexico's CIA-trained combined CIA and FBI, was created as a subdivision of the Interior Ministry in the 1940's. In the mid-70's it organized Mexico's competing dealers and growers, centralizing all Mexican-based dope distribution. This operation was based in Guadalajara, home of the "Owl" death squads and the CIA's Autonomous University of Guadalajara, the Owl base, from which emanated the DFS's "White Brigade" death squads. The centralization enabled the DFS to rake off 25% of the cartel's gross - billions - and to protect its income more efficiently.

The Owls were founded by Carlos Cuesta Gallardo, a Mexican Nazi who spent World War II in Germany. Hitler's plan was to use Cuesta as his Mexican Quisling. The co-founder of the Owls was Father Julio Meinveille, an Argentine Jesuit. Meinveille is the author of The Jew, The Cabal of Progressivism, Among the Church and the Reich and Conspiracy Against the Church. These are the Owls' bibles.

High, very high up on the Owls' enemies list was Pope John XXIII, certainly the greatest Pope of the 20th century. He was a Jew, doncha know. Makes us Hebes proud. Pope Paul VI was not only a Jew, but a drug addict! Makes us dopers proud. Every time I take a poke, I get the heavenly feeling that I'm tokin with the Pope. Meinveille was the main speaker at the 1972 CAL conference in Mexico City. The Owls' front man at Vatican Council II was Jesuit Father Saenz y Arriaga, who was excommunicated for forging the signatures of Catholic leaders on hate literature.

Cuesta Gallardo founded the Autonomous University of Guadalajara in 1935. By 1960 Gallardo's University was just a few dilapidated buildings with an annual budget of $50,000. But CIA agent Oscar Wiegland, U.S. consul in Guadalajara, arranged AID funds for the struggling "university." By 1975 Cuesta's annual budget was $10 million. This is a CIA-financed hate-center, posing as a university, that runs classes in fascist "philosophy" and, literally, coordinates CAL death squad activities, and the dope-dealing that finances them, throughout Latin America.

When Manuel Buendia, a famous investigative journalist for Mexico City's daily Excelsior revealed these facts in 1984, he was shot dead. First on the murder scene was the Mexican DFS, whose agents immediately cleaned out Buendia's files, which were said to contain a videotape of high government officials meeting with Mexico's most powerful drug dealers. The engineer of the murder was the head of the DFS, Antonio Zorilla, whom Buendia had trusted as a source and confidant. Buendia was apparently unaware that the DFS shared operational control of the Owls.

At this time the DFS ran a fleet of 600 tanker trucks, ostensibly for ferrying natural gas. According to both objective DEA investigators and an informant DFS agent considered reliable by these hardboiled pros, "They ran ten to twelve trucks a day into Phoenix and Los Angeles. They had the whole border wired." The wiring was done, obviously, using the DFS border zone commanders. The DEA and FBI are always chasing some DFS border zone commander for trafficking, usually with his paper money trial or gaudy spending.

The first director of the DFS, Capt. Rafael Chavarri, after he left the agency, went to work for Mexico's leading drug trafficker, Jorge Moreno Chauvet. Through the 40's and 50's Chauvet was a major Syndicate heroin distributor and pot and coke supplier. The Mexican border is as porous today as it was then, although the contest for control has gotten more violent. That's what killed Enrique Camarena, the DEA agent who got too close to the massive DFS system. Despite considerable publicity about this, nothing will change. Elaine Shannon: "Most DEA agents who worked in Mexico and on the border considered the DFS the private army of the drug traffickers. They called the DFS badge 'a license to traffic.'"

Since the drug trade is worth billions, it should come as no surprise that the most powerful traffickers carry DFS (now DGSN) and Interior Ministry credentials, have the right to carry submachine guns, install wiretaps and interrogate anyone. The DFS/DGSN, of course, is the enforcement arm of the PRI, Mexico's ruling party. PRI stands for "Institutional Revolutionary Party" - how's that for an oxymoron? Until the last election, when its rightwing clone took over, it ruled Mexico uninterruptedly since 1921, using and discarding "kingpins" as needed. What remains is the DFS/DGSN - the Federal Security Directorate/General Directorate of Investigations and National Security; the IPS - the Bureau of Social and Political Investigations; and the PJF - the Federal Judicial Police.

The DFS/DGSN Interior Ministry is the CIA's main base in Mexico. As one disgusted DEA agent put it, none other than Dennis Dayle, 1978-82 chief of Centac, the DEA's international strike force: "In my 30-year history in the Drug Enforcement Administration and related agencies, the major targets of my investigations almost invariably turned out to be working for the CIA." Dayle turned to novelist and reporter James Mills to advertise this. The result was Mills' The Underground Empire: Where Crime and Governments Embrace. Concludes Mills:

"The tracks are everywhere. The dapper, aristocratic Mr. Lung - 02 to his American government contacts - speaks laughingly of CIA-supported Thais helicoptering up the mountains to collect their 'goodies' from CIA client Chang Chi-fu [Khun Sa], the world's foremost opium dealer. Chang's heroin-dealing colleague, Chinese General Li Wen-huan, is known to be a CIA dependent. The CIA terminates Operation Durian, a DEA assault against [Chiu chau] Lu Hsu-shui, whose wife happens to be a cousin of Poonsiri Chanyasak, the Communist Lao government's 'minister of heroin,' and who himself turns out today to be associated with a representative of Communist Chinese intelligence. Assassin Michael Decker, suspected of CIA connections [SEAL, Operation Phoenix], describes a CIA weapons brochure found in the personal papers of Alberto Sicilia-Falcon, a major marijuana-heroin-cocaine dealer also suspected of employment by the CIA. Sicilia-Falcon and his influential bullfighter friend Gaston Santos join in a CIA-sanctioned Portugese arms deal. Sicilia-Falcon's friend and advisor, CIA-trained José Egozi, also involved in the Portugese weapons deal, talks to Centac agents and ends up hanging from a bed sheet in his Mexican prison cell. Sicilia, under torture, is said to confess to CIA drugs and weapons operations intended to destablilize Latin nations. Rearrested after his escape, facing assassination or further torture, Sicilia is rescued by a high Mexican official the CIA later identifies as its 'most important source in Mexico and Central America.' [Miguel Nazar Haro] In Panama the CIA inhibits a DEA intelligence operation, and blocks a Washington meeting between Panama's drug-dealing leader and DEA bosses." Dennis Dayle spent the better part of 1978-82 demonstrating these facts to Mills, while he was running the DEA's Central Tactical Unit.

In November of 1984 Mexican Federal Police, trapped by conservative American diplomatic pressure and aggressive DEA agents - flashing incriminating aerial photos - were forced to raid one of their own protected operations. With DEA agents, including Camarena, in tow, they turned up 10,000 tons of marijuana being grown on 150 acres in Chihuahua. That is more pot than the U.S. officially estimated was grown in all Mexico that year - in one bust.

DEA agents estimated the retail value to be $2.5 billion. This is real geopolitical power we're talking about, a weed artificially made as valuable as a precious metal. You better damn well not try to collapse that price. This enormously valuable high-tech plantation grew labor-intensive primo sinsemilla, "without seeds," marijuana in which the flowers are pinched back, causing the potent resin to accumulate in the leaves.

It was the peons like those on the Chihuahua plantation, who had been working for $6 a day, who recently joined their brethren in Chiapas and revolted, advocating their right to grow whatever the hell they wanted on an acre or two of their own.

As Subcommander Marcos, above, put it, in the Lacandona Jungle Declaration of August 1992 that announced the Zapatista rebellion: "Fifty-four percent of the population of Chiapas suffer from malnutrition, and in the highlands and forest this percentage increases to 80%. A campesino's average diet consists of coffee, corn, tortillas, and beans. One million Indigenous people live in these lands and share a disorienting nightmare with mestizos and ladinos: their only option, 500 years after the "Meeting of Two Worlds," is to die of poverty or repression."

"Government agencies made some horrifying statistics known: in Chiapas 14,500 people die every year, the highest mortality rate in the country. The causes? Curable diseases such as respiratory infections, enteritis, parasites, amoebas, malaria, salmonella, scabies, dengue, pulmonary tuberculosis, trachoma, typhus, cholera and measles."

"The oldest of the old in the Indigenous communities say that there once was a man named Zapata who rose up with his people and sang out, "Land and Freedom!" These old campesinos say that Zapata didn't die, that he must return. These old campesinos also say that the wind and the rain and the sun tell the campesinos when to cultivate the land, when to plant and when to harvest. They say that hope is also planted and harvested. They also say that the wind and the rain and the sun are now saying something different: that with so much poverty, the time has come to harvest rebellion instead of death. That is what the old campesinos say. The powerful don't hear; they can't hear, they are deafened by the brutality that the Empire shouts in their ears. 'Zapata,' insists the wind, the wind from below, our wind." Below, Zapata, and two of the women who fought with him.

On New Year's Day, 1994, the Zapatistas took San Cristóbal de las Casas, the old colonial capitol of Chiapas, and five surrounding towns. Dozens of federal police were killed before the Zapatistas retreated into the rugged Cañadas. Since then many Chiapas towns have kicked out the PRI and told its caciques what to do with their demands for a share of the crop.

The marching song of the original Zapatistas, who fatalistically called themselves "cockroaches," went: La cucaracha, la cucaracha, ya no puede viajar, porque no tiene, porque no tiene, marijuana que fumar. Today's Zapatista National Liberation Army, understanding that their ancient Mayan sacramentalism has been used as a pretext for their rape at the hands of the conquistador PRI, has banned all drugs and alcohol while at the same time calling for the "legalization of soft drugs throughout the planet." Below, Mexican troops in the Chiapas highlands, 1997.

The Zapatista "International Encounter" statement of August, 1996 insisted that the Drug War "has converted narcotrafficking into one of the most successful clandestine means of obtaining extraordinary profits" and called for "channelling the resources destined for combatting narcotrafficking into programs of development and social welfare." But Barry McCaffrey didn't become a field general by engineering cuts in his budget, or by bankrupting his "assets." The Green Berets ain't the Peace Corps.

In June of 1985, the commander of the Yucatán eradication zone, Hugo Quintanilla, his chief of pilots, and the entire Federal Judicial Police unit from the state of Campeche were arrested for trafficking in cocaine with the Herrera family, the Mexican equivalent of the Genoveses.

In July of 1990, the Mexican Secretary of the Navy, Adm. Mauricio Schleske, retired, to live part-time by his next-door neighbor in Houston, Adm. José Luís Cubria. Cubria was the recently retired Director General of the Mexican Merchant Marine. Between 1986 and 88, Schleske had military control of the Veracruz-Brownsville region, and Cubria controlled the access of commercial shipping to the same region. The Houston real estate each man bought during this period far exceeded in value anything their legal salaries could have afforded.

On November 7th, 1991, 100 Mexican soldiers, helping to unload a planeload - tons - of Colombian cocaine near Veracruz, were interrupted by Mexican drug agents. Seven of the drug agents were shot through the head, execution style. The Colombian plane escaped, the soldiers went unpunished, and the coke was distributed.

It is this army that Clinton, McCaffrey, Gelbard and Company are now arming and training in the name of the anti-drug effort. McCaffrey's "Hueys" and "Rapid Reaction Units," of course, are invariably aimed at the poor campesinos trying to maintain control of their own land. Shortly after the January 1994 onset of the Zapatista rebellion, in late April, Defense Secretary William Perry huddled with his Mexican counterpart, Gen. Enrique Cervantes Aguirre, to "explore ways in which our militaries could cooperate better."

In May, along with the first dozen of the 50 promised Hueys, combat helicopters, went Drug Czar Barry McCaffrey to oversee the formation of GAT, the Anti-Terrorist Group. GAT coordinates Mexico's secret service death squads with those of Guatemala, Spain and Argentina. Green Beret Gen. McCaffrey, who has operated as a "counterinsurgency expert" in the U.S. Southern Command since 1969, helped to coordinate the original Operation Condor death squads in the 1970's and 80's, which were also "anti-drug" operations.

Barry McCaffrey applauded the December of 1996 appointment of a career army officer, Gen. José de Jesús Gutiérrez Rebollo, rather than another corrupt politician, to head the INCD, Mexico's DEA. This coincided with the replacement of opposition party reformist Lozano as Attorney General, apparently for turning up way too much information on the PRI's family feud. Gen. Gutiérrez, said McCaffrey, "has a reputation of impeccable integrity, and he is known as an extremely forceful and focused commander.''

On February 19, 1997, after less than three months on the job, Gen. Gutiérrez was relieved of his INCD command and formally charged with being on the payroll of Amado Carillo Fuentes, Mexico's "Lord of the Skies.'' Carillo had pioneered the use of low-flying jetliners to transport multi-ton loads of cocaine from his Colombian partners to Mexico. Carillo, a power for years under Salinas, did this from his position within Mexican military intelligence. He carried Mexican Federal Judicial Police Group Chief credentials for special investigations and an officer's gold card.

Lucindo Carillo, cousin of Amado, was also un Jefe de Grupo de PJF, in Agua Prieta, Sonora, a port. The PJF Commandant in Agua Prieta, Luis Manuel Palofax-Juarez, was also a documented associate of Amado Carillo. Gen. Gutiérrez, one of the most powerful men in Mexican military intelligence, and his two top military aides, were also formally charged with stacking the INCD with Carillo's agents.

Since three-quarters of South America's cocaine must pass through Mexico on its way to the U.S., we are talking about a very high stakes power game - tens of billions in regular trade - $30 billion annually according to the U.S. Justice Department. Mexican military intelligence is not about to let that kind of power slide. That's why Gutiérrez' two top military aides were also indicted - they were under orders. That kind of money buys armaments.

Before he was relieved of command, Gutiérrez had been given repeated top-secret briefings on all Mexican-American anti-smuggling efforts and intelligence, including definitive lists of the INCD/DEA's paid Mexican informants. "The Lord of the Skies" might as well have been personally briefed by Barry McCaffrey himself. The head of the DEA, Thomas Constantine, said Gen. Gutiérrez probably would prove more damaging to the DEA than Aldrich Ames had been to the CIA.

"Aw shucks," said Barry, "I didn't know." DEA spokeman James McGivney backed McCaffrey up: "It's not our job to vet these people. We don't go around spooking military and government officials; we've got enough to do with the crooks." Pollyanna is running the DEA? Am I supposed to believe that the premier counterinsurgency expert of the vast U.S. Southern Command naval, air, radar and information system "just ain't too good at this intelligence stuff"?

Gen. Gutiérrez' narcotics trafficking was well-covered in the DEA's NADDIS (Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Information System) database long before McCaffrey hailed him as Mexico's salvation at the head of the INCD. On February 18, 1997, Mexican Defense Secretary Cervantes announced that Gutiérrez had systematically supported the Carillo cartel for 7 years. As head of the U.S. Southern Command, Gen. McCaffrey worked with Gen. Gutiérrez for most of those years.

Gutiérrez was defended in court by Tomás Arturo Gonzalez Velazquez, a very tough 43 year-old former military colleague of Gutiérrez. Gonzalez repeatedly insisted that the general's arrest was part of a power struggle within Mexican military intelligence. Gonzalez got very specific about the collaboration of top commanders, including defense minister Gen. Enrique Cervantes Aguirre, with the chief smuggling organizations. He even asserted that President Zedillo's brother-in-law had ties to a major methamphetamine trafficker. In a classified report given to Attorney General Reno in February of 98, DEA officials confirmed many of Gonzalez' accusations. Tomás Gonzalez was shot dead on April 21, 1998.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Drug War: Covert Money, Power & Policy: Viva Zapata

Postby American Dream » Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:29 am

http://www.225batonrouge.com/news/2009/ ... ers-blues/

Smuggler's blues

By Chuck Hustmyre

Thursday, April 30, 2009


Image
Barry Seal (upper left, behind the man wearing glasses) lived a daring life: he was a covert operative for the U.S. government, a drug smuggler, a star government witness, and finally a murder victim. Although some claim this 1960s-era photo depicts Seal with spies, it is actually business partners celebrating a successful aircraft sale in Mexico City.


Was Barry Seal a hero or huckster?

A daredevil drug pilot who got rich smuggling drugs into the United States, or a government sanctioned anti-communist crusader who risked his life running guns to Latin American freedom fighters?

When Seal pleaded guilty to drug smuggling charges in federal court in Baton Rouge in 1986, U.S. District Judge Frank Polozola, who was bound by an agreement hammered out between Barry Seal and the Justice Department, had no choice but to sentence the barnstorming Baton Rouge pilot to probation. Polozola made his disgust with the agreement known by adding a special condition to Seal’s sentence—six months in a halfway house.

“Drug dealers like Mr. Seal are the lowest, most despicable people I can think of,” Polozola told the assembled crowd of Drug Enforcement Administration agents and Justice Department officials who appeared at Seal’s sentencing hearing to speak on his behalf.

As Polozola handed down his sentence, he fixed his gaze on Seal. “In my opinion, people like you ought to be in prison.”

Three weeks later, Seal was shot to death in the parking lot of the Salvation Army halfway house on Airline Highway, exactly where Polozola had ordered him to live, without armed bodyguards, for six months.

‘First cousin to a bird

Adler Berriman “Barry” Seal grew up in south Baton Rouge in the 1950s. He spent his spare time hanging around the old Downtown Airport, now Independence Park, working odd jobs in exchange for flight time. Even before he graduated from Baton Rouge High School in 1957, Seal had already earned his private pilot’s wings.

Seal was a natural in the air, one of the most gifted pilots anyone in Baton Rouge can remember. “He could fly with the best of them,” Ed Duffard, one of Seal’s first flight instructors, once said in a TV interview. “That boy was first cousin to a bird.”

In 1955 Seal joined a Civil Air Patrol unit at Lakefront Airport in New Orleans. The unit’s commander was David Ferrie, then a pilot for Eastern Airlines. Ferrie was later caught up in New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison’s conspiracy investigation into the assassination of President Kennedy. Actor Joe Pesci played Ferrie in the Oliver Stone film JFK.

One of Seal’s fellow CAP cadets was a kid named Lee Harvey Oswald.

Image
The floating dock which Barry Seal used to land helicopters.[/i]

The Red Scare

The 1950s and early 1960s were patriotic times in America. Communism had taken over half of Europe and was spreading into Central and South America. By 1960, Cuban strongman Fidel Castro had established a communist dictatorship with direct links to the Soviet Union just 90 miles from the United States. Something had to be done.

Enter the CIA.

If the roots of Seal’s fervent anti-communist beliefs were founded in his conservative 1950s upbringing, the fires of those beliefs were undoubtedly stoked during his association with his Civil Air Patrol leader, David Ferrie.

Ferrie was a devout anti-communist who worked in New Orleans with a CIA-sponsored anti-Castro group called the Cuban Democratic Revolutionary Front.

According to the 1979 report of U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations, Ferrie built two miniature submarines to use in an attack on Havana Harbor. He stockpiled weapons, including mortars, for a proposed invasion of Cuba, was involved in a raid on a munitions dump in Houma, and took several of his CAP cadets on flights to Cuba. U.S. Customs agents in Miami launched an investigation of Ferrie in 1959 for weapons smuggling.

In April 1961, Ferrie took a vacation from his job at Eastern Airlines during the exact time of the CIA-backed, failed Bay of Pigs invasion, in which some U.S. pilots were known to have participated.

In 1962, Seal enlisted in the Louisiana National Guard and shipped out for six months of active duty Army training at Fort Benning, Ga. Seal earned an expert rifleman’s badge and paratrooper wings. When he returned home he was assigned to Special Forces, a unit of the U.S. Army with close ties to military intelligence, and to the CIA.

The Mexico Caper

In the mid-1960s, Seal went to work as a commercial airline pilot for Trans World Airlines. The company was owned by eccentric billionaire Howard Hughes, a man with his own longstanding connections to the CIA.

Despite lacking a college degree or any military flight training, Seal became one of the youngest pilots in TWA history to earn captain’s wings in the Boeing 707 and the jumbo 747 jetliners.

Just a few years later, though, Seal’s high-flying career as an international airline captain crashed and burned after U.S. Customs agents arrested him in New Orleans for trying to smuggle seven tons of military high explosives into Mexico.

In connection with their investigation, Customs agents seized a DC-4 cargo plane in Shreveport packed with nearly 14,000 pounds of C-4 plastic explosives, 7,000 feet of high-explosive primer cord, and 2,600 electric blasting caps. The illegal load was reportedly bound for a group of anti-Castro Cuban exiles in Mexico.

[i]Where did a 33-year-old pilot from Baton Rouge get his hands on seven tons of military high explosives? And why would he risk a promising, high-paying career as an international airline pilot to smuggle those same weapons-grade explosives into Mexico?


Seal never said, at least not publicly.

Just a week or two after his arrest, Seal had coffee with his ex-wife, Barbara, and her mother. He told them not to worry about the arrest. He wasn’t going to end up in prison, he said. “This was an operation I did for the government,” Barbara recalls Seal telling her and her mother. The explosives were part of a plan “to overthrow Fidel Castro,” Seal explained.

In a recent interview with 225, Barbara described how Barry was essentially disavowed by his own government after his 1972 arrest, something that cost him his job as an airline captain. “That was a government operation,” she insists.

In 1974, two years after his arrest on the weapons smuggling charge, the government finally brought the case before a jury, but the judge declared a mistrial and the charges against Seal were never re-filed. Seal was free, but he didn’t have a job.

Locked up in Honduras

In 1976, Seal started smuggling drugs into the United States from Central and South America. He started with marijuana. Then he moved up to cocaine. He was good at it. He was also lucky. Then his luck ran out.

On Dec. 10, 1979, Seal got busted in Honduras. Some say he had 40 kilos of cocaine inside his airplane. Others say the load was more like 17 kilos. Seal later claimed there were no drugs on the plane, just a machinegun.

Either way, he spent nearly nine months locked up in a Honduran prison before being released. Some claim he bribed his way out.

A couple of years later, Seal was smuggling cocaine for Colombia’s Medellín cartel, headed by the Ochoa brothers (Jorge, Fabio, and Juan), Carlos Lehder, José Gonzalo Rodriguez-Gacha and Pablo Escobar.

Barry was one of the cartel’s best smugglers. He was so good at flying tons of cocaine into his network of secret airfields around Baton Rouge that the Louisiana State Police formed a special unit to catch him.

Testifying at a hearing shortly after Seal’s death, State Police Lieutenant Bob Thomasson, who headed the special unit, said, “Mr. Seal was suspected of being the head of a large drug smuggling organization, consisting of some 60 people, operating in six or seven states and several foreign countries.”

Covert operators

Fellow pilot recalls Seal’s U.S. government work

A veteran CIA operative who has testified before Congress describes Barry Seal as a friend and fellow operative who for years carried out clandestine work for the U.S. government.

For decades, William “Tosh” Plumlee (in the photo on page 66 he’s the man hiding his face behind his jacket) took part in clandestine operations, mostly as a pilot, but sometimes as a member of the CIA’s ultra-secret covert action group, he told 225 in a recent telephone interview.

Plumlee trained pilots for President Kennedy’s disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion. He flew weapons to anti-Castro Cubans, to El Salvadorans fighting a communist insurgency, and to Nicaraguan contras. Much of his testimony to Congress is still classified.

“Barry Seal was a friend of mine,” Plumlee says. “I helped rig that camera on the 123.” (The C-123 “Fat Lady” was the aircraft Seal used on a government-sanctioned drug run to Nicaragua.)

Plumlee also said he is in the infamous “Mexico City” picture, seated across the table from Seal and peering out from behind his jacket.

“Seal had connections with military ops,” Plumlee says, “that went back to the ’60s or ’70s, before he was even working at TWA.”

Covert operations, especially the ones that get exposed, often get laid at the door of the CIA, Plumlee says, but in truth many operations involving things like flying weapons to far-off, war-torn places are run by military intelligence. “It’s just easier to blame everything on the CIA,” he says.

“The CIA worked as our logistical support team,” Plumlee says. “Barry Seal worked with military intelligence ... secret teams out of the Pentagon for a number of years. Even back in the Cuban days, Seal was pretty active.”

Seal’s 1972 arrest, when he was caught with a plane packed with more than 14,000 pounds of military high explosives, was a covert government operation to provide support to anti-Castro Cuban exiles in Mexico, Plumlee says. “He took a rap on that, but that was a military op.”

So what about the Mexico City photograph?

“This picture had nothing to do with any ops, any CIA,” Plumlee says. It was taken in 1964 or 1965 at a nightclub outside Mexico City. The men in the photo were celebrating a successful aircraft deal. Plumlee ferried one of the planes, an old World War II bomber, to Mexico as part of the transaction, along with Barry Seal and several other pilots.

Life wasn’t all cloak-and-dagger stuff, and much of the work Plumlee and Seal did was mundane, Plumlee says. For example, Plumlee worked as an aircraft mechanic and a plumber, while Seal bought and sold airplanes.

Plumlee says he tried to explain that to researchers who were trying to prove a connection between the photograph, Barry Seal and the Kennedy assassination. But they didn’t want to hear it, and now Plumlee says they trash him and accuse him of being a CIA disinformation agent.

“The picture was after the Kennedy assassination ... about 1965,” Plumlee says. “There was no CIA Porter Goss there. There was no Félix Rodriguez.” (Porter Goss was a CIA officer and later became director of the CIA under George W. Bush. Félix Rodriguez, aka Max Gomez, was a longtime CIA operative alleged to have hunted down and killed Che Guevara.)

The photograph was taken by a cigarette girl, who doubled as a nightclub photographer. In the picture, Plumlee is seen trying to hide behind his jacket. “I was in ops and that’s the reason I covered my damn face,” he explains. “I didn’t know they were going to be taking pictures.”

The picture, Plumlee insists, is nothing but that of a bunch of airplane bums celebrating after a successful business deal. He says he was at the nightclub for less than an hour.

“As far as Porter Goss, and Félix Rodriguez and Frank Sturgis—that’s all bull----,” Plumlee says. (Frank Sturgis was a CIA operative and soldier of fortune. He was later convicted of the Watergate break-in that led to the downfall of the Nixon administration. He was also long-rumored to have been involved in the JFK assassination.)

Although the photograph isn’t connected to a secret government mission, Barry Seal was a covert government operative, according to Plumlee.

“Seal was connected to military ops,” Plumlee says. “There’s no doubt about that. He wasn’t military, but he was contract.”

A place called Mena

Mena, Ark. is hard to find even when you’re looking for it. The isolated town sits on the western edge of the state, in the foothills of the Ouachita Mountains. One of the biggest things in Mena is the Intermountain Municipal Airport. Mena is also the center of a storm of conspiracy theories, most involving President Clinton, drug smuggling, gun running, Iran-Contra and the CIA.

Theories aside, what is not disputed is that by the early 1980s, Seal felt the heat the Louisiana State Police was putting on him so he moved his smuggling operation to Mena.

At the same time, CIA agents and other government spooks were also operating out of tiny, remote Mena.

Oliver North, a top national security aide to President Reagan, was using the Mena airport as an operational base from which to fly covert shipments of weapons to the anti-communist Nicaraguan Contras. And the CIA just happened to choose that same time to conduct what the agency called a “joint training operation” with another, unidentified federal agency at the Mena airport, and to contract for “routine aviation-related services on equipment owned by the CIA.”

So did Barry Seal work for the CIA?

In the years since his death, several sources have come forward and claimed, some during sworn testimony, that Seal was a contract pilot for the CIA who flew weapons to anti-communist forces in Central America.

A gun manufacturer in Arkansas testified in federal court that a CIA operative introduced him to Seal, who bought and shipped guns to the Contras.

Arkansas State Trooper Larry D. Brown claimed he accompanied Seal on two trips to Central America in 1984 during which Seal dropped off pallets stacked with M-16 rifles to the Contras.

CIA contract pilots Terry Reed and William “Tosh” Plumlee have said repeatedly that Seal was a pilot for U.S. intelligence. Reed said Seal hired him to train Nicaraguan pilots at a rough airstrip outside Mena. (Read more from Tosh Plumlee on page 70).

Chicago television station WMAQ reported on a confidential FBI document in which a Mena businessman admitted his company was maintaining one of Seal’s airplanes, a camouflaged military C-123, dubbed “The Fat Lady” for the CIA.

Image
Assassins gunned down Seal while he was on probation.

What does the CIA say?

In response to a Freedom of Information Act request, the CIA sent 225 Magazine an unclassified six-page summary report of the spy agency’s internal investigation into its operations at the Mena Intermountain Airport and the agency’s relationship with Seal. In the summary report (the actual report is classified), the CIA said, “Adler Berriman “Barry” Seal was never employed by the CIA in any capacity.” The agency did, however, acknowledge it had provided Seal with some technical assistance with one of his airplanes during a DEA “sting” operation in Nicaragua.

As far as drug smuggling and gun running out of Mena, the report said, “No evidence has been found that the CIA was associated with money laundering, narcotics trafficking, arms smuggling, or other illegal activities at or around Mena, Arkansas at any time.”

Working for the ‘G’

In 1984 Barry Seal’s good luck streak ended. By his own estimate he had flown 50 to 100 smuggling trips to Central and South America and had made $50 million. But the law caught up with him in Florida and Louisiana. In Fort Lauderdale, a federal grand jury indicted him in connection with a Quaalude smuggling case; and in Baton Rouge, the feds charged him with possession of 200 kilos of cocaine and money laundering. Facing upwards of 50 years in prison, Seal decided to become a DEA informant.

Seal’s DEA handlers were astounded at the access he had to the leadership of the Medellín cartel.

DEA Special Agent Robert Joura later said, “I have never met someone who has as much potential and produced as much as Mr. Seal did.”

In June 1984, Seal flew “The Fat Lady” to Nicaragua. At an airbase outside Managua, Seal picked up 1,500 pounds of Colombian cocaine and flew it to Miami. While in Managua, he used a hidden, CIA-installed camera to take secret photographs of Pablo Escobar and a high-ranking Sandinista official loading bags of cocaine onto the airplane.

The Justice Department used the photographic evidence to indict the Medellín cocaine kingpins. The White House and the CIA used the photos to embarrass the Nicaraguan government and build support for their covert war against the Sandinistas.

Three weeks later, Seal’s undercover mission to Nicaragua was blown by press leaks from the White House. Cartel leaders knew their favorite pilot was working for the U.S. government.

They wanted Barry Seal dead.

The Hit

Max Mermelstein, an American smuggler working for the Medellín cartel in Miami, got the contract to take care of Seal. “Ochoa wanted him kidnapped,” Mermelstein told PBS’s Frontline during a 1994 interview. “Escobar wanted him dead.” The cartel offered $1 million if Seal could be captured alive, $500,000 for his murder.

Mermelstein made several trips to Baton Rouge, even staking out Seal’s home on Oakbrook Drive, but he couldn’t find the elusive smuggler-turned-informant.

Image
This Amite River home, which belongs to Barry Seal’s brother Wendell Seal, was where Barry used to bring drug shipments.

Fed up with Mermelstein’s inaction, the cartel gave the contract to someone else, a cold-blooded Colombian assassin named Miguel Velez, who had already beat two murder charges in New York.

Velez put together a hit team and flew to Baton Rouge.

At 6 p.m., Feb. 19, 1986, Colombians Miguel Velez and Luis Quintero were waiting in the parking lot of the Salvation Army center on Airline Highway for Seal. They had read in the newspaper and seen on the TV news that he had to be there by six o’clock.

Three weeks earlier, Judge Frank Polozola had ordered Seal to spend every night for six months at the halfway house. The judge had specifically banned Seal from carrying a gun, or from hiring armed bodyguards.

Unarmed and alone, Seal was an easy target.

As Seal backed his big white Cadillac Fleetwood into a parking space at the Salvation Army, Quintero crouched behind the metal donations bin. He cradled a .45-caliber MAC-10 machinegun in his hands. Screwed onto the end of the barrel was a fat black silencer.

When Seal finished parking, Quintero leapt to his feet and started shooting. Three of the dozen bullets the assassin fired hit Seal in the head. Three more struck him in the chest.

The two killers fled.

Within two days, the FBI had the gunmen, along with several other members of the hit team, in custody. Velez, Quintero, and another man, Bernardo Vasquez, were convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison.

‘A Rebel Adventurer’

More than 20 years after his death, Seal is still the subject of controversy, speculation and rumor. He is mentioned in more than 80 books. Dennis Hopper played him in a movie. And conspiracy theorists have linked him to the Bay of Pigs invasion, the JFK and Martin Luther King assassinations, and the Iran-Contra scandal.

Whatever else he may have been, Seal flew through life by the seat of his pants, and in the end that’s what killed him.

“Barry was a pure-bred adventurer,” says Baton Rouge attorney Lewis Unglesby, who represented Seal during many of his legal difficulties.

Seal was buried in Baton Rouge in a sky-blue casket, under a tombstone inscribed with the epitaph he picked out for himself. “A rebel adventurer, the likes of which, in previous days, made America great.”
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Drug War: Covert Money, Power & Policy: Viva Zapata

Postby American Dream » Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:16 am

https://nacla.org/node/6369

Mexico: Corporate Hit Men Find New Ways to Turn a Profit

Jan 20 2010
Todd Miller



Following the modern recipe for corporate enterprise, the directors of Mexico's increasingly powerful murder-for-hire firm, the Zetas, have begun to diversify from the company's principal activity of providing armed enforcement for the drug-trafficking Gulf Cartel. According to U.S. and Mexican officials, the group has gone into the lucrative business of stealing and selling contraband gasoline. It steals from Mexico's nationalized petroleum company PEMEX, and resells to Texas oil companies, including one run by a former Bush administration insider.

Were the group not known for countless brutal murders in Mexico's endless and ever-more violent drug war, it might be considered the poster child of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), able to see a business opportunity when there is one, and to cut through trade barriers like a specialized drill cuts into a highly pressurized steel pipe carrying oil.

This is not only an example of criminals tapping savvy entrepreneurial skills to make another few million bucks, it is also an example of U.S. policy blowback: the perversely unintended result of a failed policy. On one hand the Zetas have been able to take advantage of NAFTA partly because of the "two way overland highway of contraband," aptly described by political economist Jeff Faux, that has been greatly facilitated by the agreement, and which now includes companies that cook deals with organized crime.

The real power of the Zetas, however, that clearly sets them apart from Mexico's other hit squads, comes from their roots. Before the founding members of the Zetas deserted an elite unit of the Mexican army, they received highly sophisticated training by U.S. Special Forces in anti-narcotic operations. This tale of oil thievery thus becomes a compelling one, especially as the U.S. public scrutinizes the ten-fold increase in "drug war" aid to Mexico under the Merida Initiative. Since 2008 Washington has pumped over a billion dollars into Mexico, with millions designated to military and police training. There will be more in store for 2010 if the funding passes later this year in Congress.

The Zetas first came to the attention of Mexico's Attorney General's office in 1999, after somewhere between 30 and 60 recently U.S.-trained soldiers defected from the Airmobile Special Forces Group (GAFE), an elite Mexican army unit specializing in counter-narcotics activity. GAFE units were trained in the United States by the "Snake Eaters," the 7th Special Forces Group, famous for their role in building up and training armies in El Salvador and Honduras in the 1980s. Between 1996 and 1999 the Snake Eaters trained over 3,000 Mexican soldiers, mostly in Fort Bragg, North Carolina. It didn't take many of these soldiers long to realize that their talents could be put to much more profitable uses - running drugs, extortion, and kidnapping for ransom, for example. The 1999 GAFE defections gave birth to the Zetas, but things didn't stop there. Between 2000 and 2005, over1,300 more of these elite soldiers defected. The GAFE desertion rate of 25% towers over any other branch of the Mexican military.

"It wasn't the tactical combat training gained under the tutelage of the 7th that should be the greatest concern," says investigative journalist Michael Reynolds. "It was the sophisticated lessons learned in intelligence gathering, counterintelligence, psychological operations," that made the training of the future Zetas like a "MIT graduate program."

With the business know-how of MIT grads, the Zetas have indeed diversified their output. The voracious U.S. appetite for gasoline almost matches that for illegal drugs. Now, not only do the Zetas have an arsenal of highly sophisticated weaponry, but they are using equally sophisticated tools to tap into Mexico's lucrative veins of oil pipes, principally in the gulf-coast states of Tamaulipas and Veracruz where they now dominate criminal enterprise. They use specialized drills to puncture steel pipes, valves to regulate the pressure, and hoses that can carry the oil as far as three kilometers to an awaiting tanker. In the state of Veracruz alone the Zetas are tapping approximately 80,000 gallons of fuel per week and illegal extraction has tripled since 2006, the year that Mexican president Felipe Calderón began his current iron-fisted approach to the war on organized crime. Over the past two years, drug traffickers have "siphoned more than $1 billion worth of oil from Mexico."

The Zetas, with their sophisticated multilayered structure that includes vast intelligence gathering, have become a "parallel government," says Mexican federal lawmaker Eduardo Mendoza Arellano. "They practically own vast stretches of pipeline - from the highway to the very door of the oil companies."

Late last year four Texas oil companies pleaded guilty to felony charges of receiving and selling stolen petroleum condensate, a liquid hydrocarbon that refiners can blend with crude oil as they produce fuel, presumably brought into the United States by the Zetas. The contraband went through a chain of companies starting with Y Gas and Oil, which received about $327,000 to coordinate deliveries to Continental Fuel, which resold the condensate to Houston-based Trammo Petroleum for $2 million. Trammo then turned a $150,000 profit, selling it to the Texas-based German company BASF, the final buyer, and the only one to claim not to know that it had been stolen. U.S. officials returned 2.4 million dollars to Mexico for the stolen fuel.

Last August the former president of Trammo, Donald Shroeder, pleaded guilty to buying the stolen Mexican petroleum. In his testimony Shroeder said that former Bush administration insider Josh Cresenzi of Continental Fuel had previous knowledge that the "condensate was stolen." In 2004 Cresenzi worked for the Bush campaign as Presidential Press Advance, a liaison to the media.

Mexico's federal police commissioner Rodrigo Esparza said that to get the condensate into the United States the Zetas used "false import documents." Although it is still unclear how the U.S. import documents were forged, journalist Michael Reynolds says that, given Shroeder's testimony, there are strong suspicions that "Cresenzi/Continental imported the condensate." Reynolds writes that the "image of Cresenzi - fresh out of Karl Rove's White House office - sitting across a desk from Zetas' Heriberto Lazcano [the Ft. Bragg trained founder of the Zetas] in Tamaulipas is like a fantastic scene conjured up from a Soderburgh/Rodriguez mashup."

The stark and illusory beauty of the U.S.-Mexico border region again shows the true nature of U.S. policy - organized crime, big business, and "former" government officials become mirror images of each other, to do the only "noble" thing under the NAFTA regime, make money. The border has become a world where murderous thugs are savvy entrepreneurs, and where former Bush campaign insiders are moving contraband. The combination of free market ideology and organized crime in a context of dramatically increasing militarization only has proven to exacerbate this type of situation, as more contraband of all types flows back and forth across the border. This is a critical narrative to contemplate when further Merida Initiative funding is debated in 2010.



Todd Miller is a NACLA Research Associate
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Drug War: Covert Money, Power & Policy: Viva Zapata

Postby American Dream » Tue Feb 02, 2010 2:31 pm

http://www.counterpunch.org/ross02022010.html

February 2, 2010

Execution of Top Capos Only Escalates the Madness

Who's Who in Mexico's Narco Wars?

By JOHN ROSS



Infiltration of Mexico's security apparatus by narco gangs is an old story. In the mid-'80s, the Direction of Federal Security, than the federal government's lead police agency, distributed get-out-of-jail passes to original gangsters like Rafael Caro Quintero and Miguel Angel Felix Gallardo - the DFS was subsequently disbanded and its agents distributed to other security forces. In the 1990s, Mexico's drug czar General Jesus Rebollo was caught with his hand in the cookie jar accepting sumptuous bribes for protecting the transportation routes of Amado Carillo AKA "The Lord of the Skies" and sentenced to 40 years in durance vile.

Since President Felipe Calderon declared war on the nation's drug cartels six days after his chaotic Dec. 1st, 2006 inauguration, infiltration of Mexico's security agencies has escalated so stupendously that the U.S. military's Joint Chief of Staffs issues reports characterizing Mexico as a "potential failed state".

Among agencies infiltrated by the narcos: the military, the federal police (one jurisdiction - the Federal Investigation Agency, a knock-off of the FBI - became so corrupted that it was liquidated), the Attorney General's Office, the Office of the Special Prosecutor for Organized Crime (SIEDO), the Mexican branch of Interpol, and dozens of state and municipal police forces (the list is compiled from news stories reporting on-going federal prosecutions.)

Now, in a bold initiative to turn the tables on the narcos, the Mexican army is training spies to infiltrate the drug gangs and embed under deep cover. The only flaw in this innovative strategy is that the army unit from which the spies are being selected and trained, the Aero Mobile Special Forces Group or GAFES has itself been compromised by the drug cartels.

Trained at the Center for Special Forces in Ft. Bragg North Carolina in drug war strategies in the late 1990s, dozens of GAFES deserted the military and joined the narco gangs, resurfacing in the early years of the decade as 'Los Zetas', dread enforcers for the Gulf Cartel who today enjoy full-blown cartel status themselves.

The cartels have not limited their reach to Mexican police agencies. U.S. Homeland Security's Border Protection and Customs Enforcement is prosecuting at least eight cases involved suspected drug cartel implants in their ranks. Mandated by Congress to boost agent numbers to 20,000 by 2010, Homeland Security launched an aggressive recruitment campaign along the border largely directed at Mexican-Americans, offering the drug gangs a golden opportunity to infiltrate their operators. One cartel double agent on duty at a U.S. border crossing is like giving the narcos "the keys to the kingdom" an anonymous ex-FBI agent recently told the New York Times. In an effort to weed out the bad actors, Homeland Security has brought in 200 criminal investigators and tripled criminal prosecutions but the investigators are themselves vulnerable to being compromised by the cartels.

South of the border, Mexican military infiltration of the narco cartels has met with mixed success. Two undercover Navy Marines were executed last summer in the port of Acapulco when their identities were leaked by unknowns. On the other hand, the January 2008 arrest of Alfredo Beltran Leyva, "El Mochomo", a member of a much-feared drug clan, was attributed to information gathered by a military spy who spent two years undercover as a Beltran Leyva operator. That's the good news. On the downside: when El Mochomo was taken into custody, he reportedly had a classified SIEDO document in his pocket that detailed federal police maneuvers against his gang.

Despite the military's long undercover investigation, Alfredo Beltran Leyva is thought to have been brought down by a "pitazo" ('whistle blow') from his archrival Joaquin "El Chapo" Guzman for whom the five Beltran Leyva brothers once toiled. The Beltran Leyvas' assumption that El Mochomo had been ratted out by Guzman and his associates was confirmed by the payback killing of El Chapo's youngest son soon after.

Both the Beltran Leyvas and the Guzmans are Sinaloa boys, natives in fact of Badiraguato, a mountain town that overlooks the fertile Culiacan valley and the birthplace of many of that Pacific coast state's legendary narcos from Caro Quintero and Felix Gallardo to Amado Carrillo to the Arellano Felixes, Gallardo's nephews, who controlled Tijuana for two decades.

Bad blood reportedly began to flow between the Beltran Leyvas and the Chapos when Guzman associate Nacho Coronel cut El Mochomo's boys out of a juicy dope deal in 2008 whereupon the Beltran Leyvas broke with Chapo's "Federation" and struck out on their own, taking big clients with them. Doing business as "La Empresa" ("The Business"), the Beltran Leyvas entered into an alliance of convenience with the Zetas with whom they had concluded a bloody border battle for the "plaza" of Nuevo Laredo just months before. The new arrangement gave the five Beltran brothers who already had a strong presence in western Mexico south of Sinaloa, including the key ports of Lazaro Cardenas in Michoacan, Acapulco. and Manzanillo Colima, access to eastern Mexico where the Zetas called the shots and strengthened both gangs' standing against El Chapo and his principal confederates Coronel, Mayo Zambada, and the wily veteran "El Azul" Esparragoza.

"El Chapo" ('Shorty') Guzman is Mexico's Narco of the Decade. His fortunes escalated with the election of Vicente Fox of the right-wing PAN party in 2000 - a month after Fox was sworn in as Mexico's first opposition president, Guzman escaped from maximum security Puente Grande prison in Jalisco and has never been touched since. Ranked number 42 on Forbes Magazine list of the 67 most powerful potentates on the planet right behind Iran's Ali Khamenei and well ahead of Nicolas Sarkozy (#54) and #67 Hugo Chavez (Felipe Calderon did not make the list), El Chapo appears to have influential friends in Los Pinos, the Mexican White House.

Mexico's presidents often have pet narcos who they favor by cracking down on their rivals, reasoning that it is less stressful to deal with one strong capo then a dozen hydra-headed cartels and dangerous, ambitious underlings. The Beltran Leyvas have repeatedly raged against the perceived protection of the Chapos by Calderon's Secretary of Public Security Genaro Garcia.

Edgardo Buscaglia, an expert on drug war economics at the Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico (ITAM), agrees that the Calderon government favors Guzman: "one necessarily has to come to the conclusion that the Mexican government is applying this strategy so it can negotiate with (El Chapo) and achieve peace prior to the 2012 elections."

Morelos, a tiny state just south of the capital where Emiliano Zapata oncerode, has been a sanctuary for narco barons since the late 1990s when the governor, Jorge Carrillo Olea, once jefe of national security, is said to have extended protection to Amado "Lord of the Skies" Carrillo (no relation) who earned his nickname by flying DC-6 loads of Colombian cocaine into Mexico.

Two PAN governors - Sergio Estrada and Marco Antonio Adame - offered similar hospitality to the Beltran Leyvas who set up shop in Cuernavaca, the state capitol. "The city of eternal spring", as it is dubbed in the tourist guides, is both close to Mexico City, the nation's key financial center, and has strategic access to Michoacan, Colima, Guerrero, and Oaxaca where "La Empresa" does plenty of business.

Spreading around "canonazos" ('cannon shots') of cash, the Beltran Leyvas bought protection from state and municipal police - Adame's Public Security Secretary was forced to resign after his ties to the narcos became public knowledge in 2008. Also said to be on the payroll: the 24th Military Region to whose jurisdiction Cuernavaca and surrounding Morelos state pertain.

Despite their generous tithing, the Beltran Leyvas' cover was blown December 11th when a newly-coordinated Marine unit raided a narco-fiesta at a "finca" (hacienda) in Tepotzlan Morelos, a community with many writers, artists, and Mexico City intellectuals in residence. The finca was said have been rented to "El Barbies", Edgar Valdez, a U.S. citizen born in Laredo Texas and the chief hitman for Arturo Beltran Leyva, "El Jefe de Jefes" ('Boss of Bosses'), the clan's leader.

Collared in the raid were 40 guests and an impressive array of pop music idols contracted to entertain the invitees, including Ramon Ayala and the Bravos del Norte, winners of four Latin Grammies; the ever-popular corridistas Los Cadetes de Linares; and El Torrente, a reggaeton band. Mexican pop idols do not eschew such gigs, conceded Paquita La de Barrio, whose "Rata de Dos Patas" ("Two-legged Rat") is an international favorite. "Narcos are our bread and butter. You never know who they are. They invite you and you sing and that's it. They are very polite and pay well," La del Barrio confessed to the left daily La Jornada. "Work is work."

The deployment of Navy Marines in the drug war is the latest wrinkle in Calderon's crusade. For years, the Navy's role has been pretty much confined to patrolling Mexico's coastlines, occasionally landing big drug hauls when tipped off by the Drug Enforcement Administration and the U.S. Coast Guard. In 2007, Mexican Navy personnel were credited with a record 23-ton cocaine stop in Manzanillo. Last summer, the Navy took down a monkey flag tuna boat in Puerto Progresso Yucatan with 750 tons of blow crammed down the caws of a hold full of frozen sharks.

In 2009, residents of Mexico City's swanky Polanco district were startled when jack-booted Marines kicked down doors at the corporate offices of Grupo Penoles, a Fortune list mining conglomerate, after $41,000,000 in Yanqui dollars was found embedded in a load of industrial chemicals bound for Colombia.

The Marines' first land assault came last September when they captured a second string capo, El Gori, in Juarez Nuevo Leon. The Tepotzlan narco-fiesta came next. Now they moved in for the kill.

Long-term observers of Mexico's narco wars like Jorge Camil, a National University researcher, speculate that U.S. drug fighters, operating under enhanced powers granted by the Washington-financed Merida Initiative, requested deployment of the Mexican Navy to confront the Beltran Leyvas because the army - in this case, the 24th Military Region - is no longer trustworthy.

On December 16th, five days after they had broken up the narco fiesta in Tepotzlan, the Marines swept through the luxury Cuernavaca sub-division "Los Altitudes" where high-rise condominiums offer a stunning view of surrounding volcanoes, and a stone's throw from the 24th Military Region. All apartments were cleared and the upscale tenants herded into the complex's state-of-the-art gymnasium. Residents seemed shocked that one of Mexico's top narco lords lived among them.

Although drug lords have big footprints - "El Jefe de Los Jefes" always traveled in a seven-car caravan of mean-looking gunsills loaded for bear - few of their neighbors had paid much attention. "At Los Altitudes, everyone has bodyguards," a former resident matter-of-factly told this reporter over canapés at a Christmas party.

Other big shots in residence include a PAN senator and the state president of the PANAL party, the wholly owned property of Education Workers Union czarina Elva Esther Gordillo, one of the most influential personages in Mexican politics.

Holed up in Apartment 201 of the Elbus Building, Arturo Beltran Leyva and six pistoleros went to the mattresses. A five-hour gun battle erupted with the narcos hurling fragmentation grenades in a desperate attempt to break through the Marine barricade. Under relentless Marine fire, the Boss of Bosses and his henchmen (one committed suicide) bit the dust - three Marines were gravely wounded and one subsequently succumbed.

After 2 a.m. the next morning, representatives of the press were allowed in to a bullet-pocked Apartment 201 to view the crime scene. The much-punctured cadaver of Arturo Beltran Leyva was laid out on a blood-drenched bedspread, his pants pulled down to his jockey shorts and his corpse decorated with neatly-arranged pesos and greenbacks, amulets and rosaries, apparently removed from his pockets (the dead capo reportedly was carrying $40,000 USD.)

Cameras captured this macabre scene for the nation's front pages. The desecration of the body and grotesque display of narco iconology was attributed to Cuernavaca forensic technicians under the direction of ski-masked, undercover Marines, according to eyewitness Gustavo Castillo, a Jornada reporter. The Navy denies culpability. Jorge Camil, writing in La Jornada, compared the Gran Guignol tableau to the gristly coverage of the U.S. military's execution of Saddam Hussein's two sons in 2003.

As to be anticipated, President Calderon exulted in the capture and slaughter of Beltran Leyva and his malevolent crew. Rookie U.S. ambassador Carlos Pascual toasted the Mexican president's commitment to Washington's drug war and DEA administrator Michelle Leonhart attributed the success of the operation to "cooperation with our valiant counterparts" which suggests that U.S. drug warriors may have played a more pivotal role in Beltran Leyva's demise than was acknowledged. All extolled the heroics of the dead Marine, First Corps Master Melquidet Angulo. At his funeral in Angulo's home town of Paradise Tabasco, Navy brass swore "unconditional support" for the slain Marine's family.

Three nights later, a Zeta hit squad broke into the Angulos' rural ranch and killed the dead marine's mother, two brothers, and an aunt, signaling the next round of bloodshed.

In Cuernavaca, a "narco-manta" - bed sheets painted with messages to the authorities, a signature device of the Beltran Leyva clan - was hung from a pedestrian overpass. "Now they have committed a grave error by messing with the Empresa," the narco-manta announced, "El Barbies (who is still at large) you have all our support to start a new war."

Since Felipe Calderon's ill-advised declaration of war on Mexico's drug cartels December 6th 2006, 16,000 plus citizens have lost their lives - 7000 of them, nearly half the kill list, in 2009 alone, an average of 25 a day, more than one an hour. On 40 days last year, 40 or more Mexicans were killed. On December 16th, the day the Boss of Bosses went down, 64 died, a record one-day high in drug war homicides. The execution of Arturo Beltran Leyva will only accelerate this madness.


John Ross is on the road with his latest cult classic "El Monstruo - Dread & Redemption in Mexico City" ("a pulsating, gritty read" - the NY Post.) The author will kick off the Monster Tour in California's Central Valley with presentations at Cal State Fresno (Feb 4th-5th), the Merced Public Library (Feb. 6th) and Modesto (Feb. 7th.) - locale TBA.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Drug War: Covert Money, Power & Policy: Viva Zapata

Postby Luther Blissett » Sat Jul 24, 2010 5:33 pm

Does anyone have any news on Zeta operations in the states? I've heard some rumors of some takeovers of Texas ranches by Los Zetas but it was from a real misinformed "Patriot" type and I'm not sure I can trust him. The source he sent me is down.
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4990
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Drug War: Covert Money, Power & Policy: Viva Zapata

Postby ShinShinKid » Sat Jul 24, 2010 6:36 pm

There was the military-style killing of Bob Krentz, here in Southern AZ.

Also, obviously trained personnel recently had a local sheriff's deputy wounded and pinned down...they never caught the team that attacked the deputy.

Just today, the BBC announced a mass grave was found with at last count 38 bodies...signs of torture, etc.

The United States is in denial about exactly how close REAL terrorism is to their border. Mexico is just short of a failed state, and barely clinging on...It's really only a matter of time before another crack team encounters a team of young rookie federal agents and rips them to shreds; then maybe the government might have to acknowledge the violence that occurs on the border and South of it. If this stuff was happening in Iraq, where local and federal law enforcement offcials, judges, presidential candidates, were getting killed on a daily basis, they would call for another surge. As it is, official statistics have the level at 25% of Iraq's Highest! This situation is only going to get worse.
Well played, God. Well played".
User avatar
ShinShinKid
 
Posts: 565
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 9:25 pm
Location: Home
Blog: View Blog (26)

War on Drugs, Money Laundry and Plan (Destroy) Mexico

Postby JackRiddler » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:55 am

.

I had no idea that the United Nations appointed a Global Commission on Drug Policy consisting of Kofi Annan, Paul Volcker, Papandreou (the current Greek PM), Louise Arbour, Branson, Carlos Fuentes, Zedillo (the former Mexican president), Gaviria (former Colombian president), Javier Solana, Cardoso (former Brazilian president and chair of the Commission), Mario Vargas Llosa, even George Fucking Schultz (vice-chair) and former Goldman Sachs head John Whitehead... for the most part a rogues' gallery of conservatives, bankers and neoliberals.

Their report has just been published, and you'll never believe what they said, except that it's the usually unspeakable, the hundred-year taboo, the thing we all know well and constantly bitch about here, The Obvious:


(Download report in Spanish or English as PDF at http://www.globalcommissionondrugs.org/Report -- the whole thing is just 24 pages!)

Executive Summary

The global war on drugs has failed, with devastating consequences for individuals and societies around the world. Fifty years after the initiation of the UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, and 40 years after President Nixon launched the US government’s war on drugs, fundamental reforms in national and global drug control policies are urgently needed.

Vast expenditures on criminalization and repressive measures directed at producers, traffickers and consumers of illegal drugs have clearly failed to effectively curtail supply or consumption. Apparent victories in eliminating one source or trafficking organization are negated almost instantly by the emergence of other sources and traffickers. Repressive efforts directed at consumers impede public health measures to reduce HIV/AIDS, overdose fatalities and other harmful consequences of
drug use. Government expenditures on futile supply reduction strategies and incarceration displace more cost-effective and evidence-based investments in demand and harm reduction.

Our principles and recommendations can be summarized as follows:

End the criminalization, marginalization and stigmatization of people who use drugs but who do no harm to others. Challenge rather than reinforce common misconceptions about drug markets, drug use and drug dependence.

Encourage experimentation by governments with models of legal regulation of drugs to undermine the power of organized crime and safeguard the health and security of their citizens. This recommendation applies especially to cannabis, but we also encourage other experiments in decriminalization and legal regulation that can accomplish these objectives and provide models for others.

Offer health and treatment services to those in need. Ensure that a variety of treatment modalities are available, including not just methadone and buprenorphine treatment but also the heroin-assisted treatment programs that have proven successful in many European countries and Canada. Implement syringe access and other harm reduction measures that have proven effective in reducing transmission of HIV and other blood-borne infections as well as fatal overdoses. Respect the human rights of people who use drugs. Abolish abusive practices carried out in the name of treatment – such as forced detention, forced labor, and physical or psychological abuse – that contravene human rights standards and norms or that remove the right to self-determination.

Apply much the same principles and policies stated above to people involved in the lower ends of illegal drug markets, such as farmers, couriers and petty sellers. Many are themselves victims of violence and intimidation or are drug dependent. Arresting and incarcerating tens of millions of these people in recent decades has filled prisons and destroyed lives and families without reducing the availability of illicit drugs or the power of criminal organizations. There appears to be almost no limit to the number of people willing to engage in such activities to better their lives, provide for their families, or otherwise escape poverty. Drug control resources are better directed elsewhere.

Invest in activities that can both prevent young people from taking drugs in the first place and also prevent those who do use drugs from developing more serious problems. Eschew simplistic ‘just say no’ messages and ‘zero tolerance’ policies in favor of educational efforts grounded in credible information and prevention programs that focus on social skills and peer influences. The most successful prevention efforts may be those targeted at specific at-risk groups.

Focus repressive actions on violent criminal organizations, but do so in ways that undermine their power and reach while prioritizing the reduction of violence and intimidation. Law enforcement efforts should focus not on reducing drug markets per se but rather on reducing their harms to individuals, communities and national security.

Begin the transformation of the global drug prohibition regime. Replace drug policies and strategies driven by ideology and political convenience with fiscally responsible policies and strategies grounded in science, health, security and human rights – and adopt appropriate criteria for their evaluation. Review the scheduling of drugs that has resulted in obvious anomalies like the flawed categorization of cannabis, coca leaf and MDMA. Ensure that the international conventions are interpreted and/or revised to accommodate robust experimentation with harm reduction, decriminalization and legal regulatory policies.

Break the taboo on debate and reform. The time for action is now.


INTRODUCTION

[I think the chart should be readable without formatting.]

UNITED NATIONS ESTIMATES OF ANNUAL DRUG CONSUMPTION, 1998 TO 2008

1998
2008
% Increase

Opiates
12.9 million
17.35 million
+34.5%

Cocaine
13.4 million
17 million
+27%

Cannabis
147.4 million
160 million
8.5%

The global war on drugs has failed. When the United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs came into being 50 years ago, and when President Nixon launched the US government’s war on drugs 40 years ago, policymakers believed that harsh law enforcement action against those involved in drug production, distribution and use would lead to an ever-diminishing market in controlled drugs such as heroin, cocaine and cannabis, and the eventual achievement of a ‘drug free world’. In practice, the global scale of illegal drug markets – largely controlled by organized crime – has grown dramatically over this period. While accurate estimates of global consumption across the entire 50-year period are not available, an analysis of the last 10 years alone1,2,3,4 shows a large and growing market.

(See chart above.)

In spite of the increasing evidence that current policies are not achieving their objectives, most policymaking bodies at the national and international level have tended to avoid open scrutiny or debate on alternatives.

This lack of leadership on drug policy has prompted the establishment of our Commission, and leads us to our view that the time is now right for a serious, comprehensive and wide-ranging review of strategies to respond to the drug phenomenon. The starting point for this review is the recognition of the global drug problem as a set of interlinked health and social challenges to be managed, rather than a war to be won.

Commission members have agreed on four core principles that should guide national and international drug policies and strategies, and have made eleven recommendations for action.

1. Drug policies must be based on solid empirical and scientific evidence. The primary measure of success should be the reduction of harm to the health, security and welfare of individuals and society.

SNIP

2. Drug policies must be based on human rights and public health principles. We should end the stigmatization and marginalization of people who use certain drugs and those involved in the lower levels of cultivation, production and distribution, and treat people dependent on drugs as patients, not criminals.

SNIP

3. The development and implementation of drug policies should be a global shared responsibility,
but also needs to take into consideration diverse political, social and cultural realities. Policies should respect the rights and needs of people affected by production, trafficking and consumption, as explicitly acknowledged in the 1988 Convention on Drug Trafficking.


SNIP

The idea that the international drug control system is immutable, and that any amendment – however reasonable or slight – is a threat to the integrity of the entire system, is short-sighted. As with all multilateral agreements, the drug conventions need to be subject to constant review and modernization in light of changing and variable circumstances. Specifically, national governments must be enabled to exercise the freedom to experiment with responses more suited to their circumstances. This analysis and exchange of experiences is a crucial element of the process of learning about the relative effectiveness of different approaches, but the belief that we all need to have exactly the same laws, restrictions and programs has been an unhelpful restriction.

4. Drug policies must be pursued in a comprehensive manner, involving families, schools, public health specialists, development practitioners and civil society leaders, in partnership with law enforcement agencies and other relevant governmental bodies.

SNIP

UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES

The implementation of the war on drugs has generated widespread negative consequences for societies in
producer, transit and consumer countries. These negative consequences were well summarized by the former Executive Director of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Antonio Maria Costa, as falling into five broad categories:

1. The growth of a ‘huge criminal black market’, financed by the risk-escalated profits of supplying international demand for illicit drugs.

2. Extensive policy displacement, the result of using scarce resources to fund a vast law enforcement effort intended to address this criminal market.

3. Geographical displacement, often known as ‘the balloon effect’, whereby drug production shifts location to avoid the attentions of law enforcement.

4. Substance displacement, or the movement of consumers to new substances when their previous drug of choice becomes difficult to obtain, for instance through law enforcement pressure.

5. The perception and treatment of drug users, who are stigmatized, marginalized and excluded.

[Lots of SNIP!]


DECRIMINALIZATION INITIATIVES DO NOT RESULT IN SIGNIFICANT INCREASES IN DRUG USE

Portugal

In July 2001, Portugal became the first European country to decriminalize the use and possession of all illicit drugs. Many observers were critical of the policy, believing that it would lead to increases in drug use and associated problems. Dr. Caitlin Hughes of the University of New South Wales and Professor Alex Stevens of the University of Kent have undertaken detailed research into the effects of decriminalization in Portugal. Their recently published findings26 have shown that this was not the case, replicating the conclusions of their earlier study27 and that of the CATO Institute28.

Hughes and Stevens’ 2010 report detects a slight increase in overall rates of drug use in Portugal in the 10 years since decriminalization, but at a level consistent with other similar countries where drug use remained criminalized. Within this general trend, there has also been a specific decline in the use of heroin, which was in 2001 the main concern of the Portuguese government. Their overall conclusion is that the removal of criminal penalties, combined with the use of alternative therapeutic responses to people struggling with drug dependence, has reduced the burden of drug law enforcement on the criminal justice system and the overall level of problematic drug use.


Comparing Dutch and US Cities

A study by Reinarman, et. al. compared the very different regulatory environments of Amsterdam, whose liberal “cannabis cafe” policies (a form of de facto decriminalization) go back to the 1970s, and San Francisco, in the US, which criminalizes cannabis users. The researchers wished to examine whether the more repressive policy environment of San Francisco deterred citizens from smoking cannabis or delayed the onset of use. They found that it did not, concluding that:

“Our findings do not support claims that criminalization reduces cannabis use and that decriminalization increases cannabis use... With the exception of higher drug use in San Francisco, we found strong similarities across both cities. We found no evidence to support claims that criminalization reduces use or that decriminalization increases use.”29


RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Break the taboo. Pursue an open debate and promote policies that effectively reduce consumption, and that prevent and reduce harms related to drug use and drug control policies. Increase investment in research and analysis into the impact of different policies and programs.25

Political leaders and public figures should have the courage to articulate publicly what many of them acknowledge privately: that the evidence overwhelmingly demonstrates that repressive strategies will not solve the drug problem, and that the war on drugs has not, and cannot, be won. Governments do have the power to pursue a mix of policies that are appropriate to their own situation, and manage the problems caused by drug markets and drug use in a way that has a much more positive impact on the level of related crime, as well as social and health harms.

2. Replace the criminalization and punishment of people who use drugs with the offer of health and treatment services to those who need them.

A key idea behind the ‘war on drugs’ approach was that the threat of arrest and harsh punishment would deter people from using drugs. In practice, this hypothesis has been disproved – many countries that have enacted harsh laws and implemented widespread arrest and imprisonment of drug users and low-level dealers have higher levels of drug use and related problems than countries with more tolerant approaches. Similarly, countries that have introduced decriminalization, or other forms of reduction in arrest or punishment, have not seen the rises in drug use or dependence rates that had been feared.

SNIP

3. Encourage experimentation by governments with models of legal regulation of drugs (with cannabis, for example) that are designed to undermine the power of organized crime and safeguard the health and security of their citizens.

SNIP

4. Establish better metrics, indicators and goals to measure progress.

SNIP

5. Challenge, rather than reinforce, common misconceptions about drug markets, drug use and drug dependence.

Currently, too many policymakers reinforce the idea that all people who use drugs are ‘amoral addicts’, and all those involved in drug markets are ruthless criminal masterminds. The reality is much more complex. The United Nations makes a conservative estimate that there are currently 250 million illicit drug users in the world, and that there are millions more involved in cultivation, production and distribution. We simply cannot treat them all as criminals.

To some extent, policymakers’ reluctance to acknowledge this complexity is rooted in their understanding of public opinion on these issues. Many ordinary citizens do have genuine fears about the negative impacts of illegal drug markets, or the behavior of people dependent on, or under the influence of, illicit drugs. These fears are grounded in some general assumptions about people who use drugs and drug markets, that government and civil society experts need to address by increasing awareness of some established (but largely unrecognized) facts. For example:

• The majority of people who use drugs do not fit the stereotype of the ‘amoral and pitiful addict’. Of the estimated 250 million drug users worldwide, the United Nations estimates that less than 10 percent can be classified as dependent, or ‘problem drug users’.36
• Most people involved in the illicit cultivation of coca, opium poppy, or cannabis are small farmers struggling to make a living for their families. Alternative livelihood opportunities are better investments than destroying their only available means of survival.
• The factors that influence an individual’s decision to start using drugs have more to do with fashion, peer influence, and social and economic context, than with the drug’s legal status, risk of detection, or government prevention messages.37, 38
• The factors that contribute to the development of problematic or dependent patterns of use have more to do with childhood trauma or neglect, harsh living conditions, social marginalization, and emotional problems, rather than moral weakness or hedonism.39
• It is not possible to frighten or punish someone out of drug dependence, but with the right sort of evidence-based treatment, dependent users can change their behavior and be active and productive members of the community.40
• Most people involved in drug trafficking are petty dealers and not the stereotyped gangsters from the movies – the vast majority of people imprisoned for drug dealing or trafficking are ‘small fish’ in the operation (often coerced into carrying or selling drugs), who can easily be replaced without disruption to the supply.41,42

A more mature and balanced political and media discourse can help to increase public awareness and understanding. Specifically, providing a voice to representatives of farmers, users, families and other communities affected by drug use and dependence can help to counter myths and misunderstandings.

6. Countries that continue to invest mostly in a law enforcement approach (despite the evidence) should focus their repressive actions on violent organized crime and drug traffickers, in order to reduce the harms associated with the illicit drug market.

The resources of law enforcement agencies can be much more effectively targeted at battling the organized crime groups that have expanded their power and reach on the back of drug market profits. In many parts of the world, the violence, intimidation and corruption perpetrated by these groups is a significant threat to individual and national security and to democratic institutions, so efforts by governments and law enforcement agencies to curtail their activities remain essential.

7. Promote alternative sentences for small-scale and first-time drug dealers.

SNIP

8. Invest more resources in evidence-based prevention, with a special focus on youth.

SNIP

9. Offer a wide and easily accessible range of options for treatment and care for drug dependence, including substitution and heroin-assisted treatment, with special attention to those most at risk, including those in prisons and other custodial settings.

SNIP

10.The United Nations system must provide leadership in the reform of global drug policy. This means promoting an effective approach based on evidence, supporting countries to develop drug policies that suit their context and meet their needs, and ensuring coherence among various UN agencies, policies and conventions.

SNIP

11. Act urgently: the war on drugs has failed, and policies need to change now.

SNIP




COMMISSIONERS

Asma Jahangir, human rights activist, former UN Special Rapporteur on Arbitrary, Extrajudicial and Summary Executions, Pakistan
Carlos Fuentes, writer and public intellectual, Mexico
César Gaviria, former President of Colombia
Ernesto Zedillo, former President of Mexico
Fernando Henrique Cardoso, former President of Brazil (chair)
George Papandreou, Prime Minister of Greece
George P. Shultz, former Secretary of State, United States (honorary chair)
Javier Solana, former European Union High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy, Spain
John Whitehead, banker and civil servant, chair of the World Trade Center Memorial Foundation, United States
Kofi Annan, former Secretary General of the United Nations, Ghana
Louise Arbour, former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, President of the International Crisis Group, Canada
Maria Cattaui, Petroplus Holdings Board member, former Secretary-General of the International Chamber of Commerce, Switzerland
Mario Vargas Llosa, writer and public intellectual, Peru
Marion Caspers-Merk, former State Secretary at the German Federal Ministry of Health
Michel Kazatchkine, executive director of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, France
Paul Volcker, former Chairman of the United States Federal Reserve and of the Economic Recovery Board
Richard Branson, entrepreneur, advocate for social causes, founder of the Virgin Group, co-founder of The Elders, United Kingdom
Ruth Dreifuss, former President of Switzerland and Minister of Home Affairs
Thorvald Stoltenberg, former Minister of Foreign Affairs and UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Norway



Okay, they left out the part where the banks launder hundreds of billions of dollars in illegal drug revenues every year, maintaining a global financial system that, not only in this way, is based primarily on crime.

The following is a story reporting on the Commission findings, but all that matters is the last line.


http://www.businessinsider.com/the-war- ... led-2011-6

SNIP

White house drug czar Gil Kerlikowske broadly rejects the commissions recommendations.



Image


http://www.kgoam810.com/rssItem.asp?fee ... d=29675471

White House Slams Report that Says War on Drugs 'Has Failed'


(WASHINGTON) -- The White House is slamming a report from the Global Commission on Drug Policy that says the long running war on drugs has been a failure.

In the report, the commission stated, "The global war on drugs has failed, with devastating consequences for individuals and societies around the world. Fifty years after the initiation of the U.N. Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, and 40 years after President Nixon launched the U.S. government’s war on drugs, fundamental reforms in national and global drug control policies are urgently needed."

The commission also recommended that certain controlled substances should be legalized.

However, the White House says legalizing drugs like marijuana remains a non-starter for the Obama administration.

The Office of National Drug Policy says the war is succeeding because overall drug use in the U.S. is about half what in was in the late 70s. The president's approach, the office says, focuses on drug addiction as a disease, providing treatment and on efforts to prevent drug abuse.


Image

.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 15983
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: War on Drugs, Money Laundry and Plan (Destroy) Mexico

Postby Alfred Joe's Boy » Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:29 pm

It was supposed to fail.
Alfred Joe's Boy
 
Posts: 222
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:29 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: War on Drugs, Money Laundry and Plan (Destroy) Mexico

Postby hanshan » Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:34 pm

...


JackRiddler:

I had no idea that the United Nations appointed a Global Commission on Drug Policy consisting of Kofi Annan, Paul Volcker, Papandreou (the current Greek PM), Louise Arbour, Branson, Carlos Fuentes, Zedillo (the former Mexican president), Gaviria (former Colombian president), Javier Solana, Cardoso (former Brazilian president and chair of the Commission), Mario Vargas Llosa, even George Fucking Schultz (vice-chair) and former Goldman Sachs head John Whitehead... for the most part a rogues' gallery of conservatives, bankers and neoliberals.



Yeah, well...(you're getting a little intellectually lazy, Jack, w/ your blanket inditement)...

Carlos Fuentes

(born November 11, 1928) is a Mexican writer and one of the best-known living novelists and essayists in the Spanish-speaking world. He has influenced contemporary Latin American literature, and his works have been widely translated into English and other languages.

Mario Vargas Llosa


1st Marquis of Vargas Llosa[1][2] (Spanish pronunciation: [ˈmaɾjo ˈβarɣas ˈʎosa]; born March 28, 1936) is a Peruvian-Spanish writer, politician, journalist, essayist, and Nobel Prize laureate.[3] Vargas Llosa is one of Latin America's most significant novelists and essayists, and one of the leading authors of his generation. Some critics consider him to have had a larger international impact and worldwide audience than any other writer of the Latin American Boom.[4] He was awarded the 2010 Nobel Prize in Literature "for his cartography of structures of power and his trenchant images of the individual's resistance, revolt, and defeat".[5]

On the other hand, the bold-faced hypocrisy (e.g., Zedillo, a notorious nacrotrafficante), laughable.



JackRiddler:

Okay, they left out the part where the banks launder hundreds of billions of dollars in illegal drug revenues every year, maintaining a global financial system that, not only in this way, is based primarily on crime.


What? Crime doesn't pay? The fly in the ointment?

Points for the photoshop.

tx


...
hanshan
 
Posts: 1673
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:04 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: War on Drugs, Money Laundry and Plan (Destroy) Mexico

Postby elfismiles » Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:38 pm

Alfred Joe's Boy wrote:It was supposed to fail.


Too big to fail.
User avatar
elfismiles
 
Posts: 8511
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (4)

Re: War on Drugs, Money Laundry and Plan (Destroy) Mexico

Postby JackRiddler » Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:02 pm

hanshan wrote:...


JackRiddler:

I had no idea that the United Nations appointed a Global Commission on Drug Policy consisting of Kofi Annan, Paul Volcker, Papandreou (the current Greek PM), Louise Arbour, Branson, Carlos Fuentes, Zedillo (the former Mexican president), Gaviria (former Colombian president), Javier Solana, Cardoso (former Brazilian president and chair of the Commission), Mario Vargas Llosa, even George Fucking Schultz (vice-chair) and former Goldman Sachs head John Whitehead... for the most part a rogues' gallery of conservatives, bankers and neoliberals.



Yeah, well...(you're getting a little intellectually lazy, Jack, w/ your blanket inditement)...

...


"For the most part" means it's not a blanket indictment. It leaves room for Arbour, Fuentes and a couple of others...

As it happens, "neoliberal" covers Vargas Llosa, who ran for president as the would-be Peruvian Thatcher against a certain Fujimori, who turned out to be a tad different than advertised. Not that he isn't a great writer. (I assume he is, because I know I've read a couple of stories by him but for the life of me I can't recall...)

Anyway, why you hounding Hulk now? You know what my point is, and it's that EVEN THESE GUYS ARE SAYING IT! As you say, Zedillo: Even with legalization (in 30 years, sadly) no one's coming after his proceeds, he can be fairly sure. Ronald Reagan's George Schultz. Volker. A Goldman head. Even these guys are saying it.

How nice to be retired and really old, and able to say the occasional truth. Papandreou's the only sitting official, and my feeling that they're hypocrites is probably about to be confirmed by Greece's total failure to take any action on drug reform in the next few years. Still, hypocrites or no, even these guys are saying it! And they are not presenting a middle-of-the-road faux reform position. They're saying, drug war has failed, period. And: legalize marijuana and try legalizing everything else.

Meanwhile, cross-post from Wall Street thread:


http://www.borderlandbeat.com/2011/05/t ... p-for.html

Too Big to Do Time?: Fed Wrist-slap for Wachovia Bank Makes a Farce of the Drug War

Image
Friday, May 27, 2011 | Borderland Beat Reporter Gari

By:
Linn Washington Jr.


The U.S. government won convictions against 23,506 drug traffickers nationwide during 2010, sending 96 percent of the offenders to prison, according to U.S. Sentencing Commission statistics.

Yet one of the biggest entities busted by the feds for involvement in drug trafficking last year received just a wrist-slap deal from federal prosecutors with nobody getting prison time.

During 2010, the U.S. government also won convictions against 806 persons involved in smaller-time drug-related money laundering, sending nearly 77 percent of those offenders to prison.

Yet when it came to a case involving billions of dollars in illegal drug profits, the federal government gave the same unusual wrist-slap to the same entity caught giving greed-blinded assistance to Mexican drug cartels by laundering billions of dollars in illegal profits for them.

So, what is this entity that federal prosecutors found worthy of big breaks for its laundering of billions of dollars, and for its blatant facilitating or tons of smuggled cocaine?

Meet Wachovia – once the nation’s sixth largest bank by assets and now a part of Wells Fargo Bank… a too-big-to-fail bank that for the feds is apparently too-big-to jail.

Wachovia recently completed what amounted to a year-long probation arising from a March 2010 settlement deal with federal prosecutors who were pursuing criminal proceedings against Wachovia for its facilitating of illegal money transfers from Mexico totaling $378-billion…a staggering sum greater than half of the Pentagon's annual budget, which included billions of dollars traced directly to violent Mexican drug cartels.

The record $160-million fine slapped on Wachovia under terms of that settlement deal included a $50-million assessment for failing to monitor cash used to ship into the US 22 tons of cocaine. (That fine amounted to less than two percent of Wachovia's profits during the prior year.)

Wells Fargo now owns Wachovia. Wells Fargo, federal prosecutors stress, was not involvement in the misdeeds that landed Wachovia in court, where it received a deferred prosecution deal.

Wells Fargo purchased Wachovia in early 2009 for $12.7-billion, shortly after Wells Fargo had received $25-billion in federal bail-out funds from the TARP program. That purchase helped make Wells Fargo America’s second-largest bank.

Many condemn the federal government settlement with Wachovia as a farce.

Criticism has come from persons in law enforcement frustrated by big-bank involvement in laundering drug money and from those who claim federal drug enforcement practices provide bigger breaks to drug kingpins than to low-level operators.

“All the law enforcement people wanted to see this come to trial. But no one goes to jail,” said Martin Woods, an English expert on anti-money laundering, whose work while with Wachovia’s London office helped unravel the drug connections. Woods says Wachovia officials bashed him for his investigative diligence and whistle-blowing as an employee.

“It’s simple: it you don’t see the correlation between the money laundering by banks and people killed in Mexico, you’re missing the point,” Woods said in an April 3, 2011 article published in The Observer, a British newspaper published on Sundays.

Wachovia’s involvement in big-time money laundering paralleled the period of a murderous escalation in violence in Mexico’s Drug War that has claimed the lives of over 40,000 Mexicans since 2006 alone, with the dead including politicians, prosecutors, police, soldiers, drug gang members and innocent bystanders.

During the same month last year when federal prosecutors gave Wachovia a break, finding no need to imprison any bank personnel for their involvement in massive drug-tainted money laundering, other federal prosecutors were pounding domestic drug dealers with long prison sentences.

For example, an Anchorage, Alaska man received a ten-year term for selling four ounces of crack cocaine, while an East St. Louis, Ill. businessman received a life sentence plus a $2.25-million fine for distributing three thousand pounds of cocaine between 2004 and his arrest in April 2008.

The amount of cocaine trafficking that sent the Illinois man to prison for life – one and a half tons - was much smaller than that single 22 ton cocaine shipment referenced in the Wachovia settlement document.

The settlement agreement Wachovia officials signed with federal prosecutors in Miami last year clearly stated that the bank knew that many of the transactions with Mexican financial institutions from 2004 to 2007 carried the stench of drugs.

That settlement agreement stated in part that as early as “2005 Wachovia was aware that other large US banks were exiting the [Mexican] business based on [anti-money laundering] concerns…Despite these warnings, Wachovia remained in business” according to news media reports.

One reason Wachovia stayed in the business as others pulled out is that the bank reaped hefty fees from that money-laundering "business," in which billions of dollars in wire transfers, traveler’s checks and bulk cash shipments went into Wachovia accounts from Mexican exchange facilities called casa de cambios (CDCs).

Jeffery Solman, the federal prosecutor who handled the Wachovia case, stated last year that “Wachovia’s blatant disregard for our banking laws gave international cocaine cartels a virtual carte blanche to finance their operations.”

Last year Bloomberg News, in an article on the Wachovia money laundering scandal, reported how the federal government cited other mega-financial institutions in the U.S. like American Express Bank International and Bank of America for their complicity in laundering drug money.

Making a farce out of the nation's supposed War on Drugs, none of the mega-financial institutions identified by federal authorities as having been involved with laundering drug money and none of the well-paid individuals at those institutions which were facilitating that laundering has faced go-to-jail federal criminal prosecutions like those targeting small fry in the drug trade.

Days after Wachovia received its wrist-slap deal for laundering billions of dollars in drug money, federal prosecutors secured a five-year sentence for a 26-year-old Johnstown, Pa. man involved with a drug ring it claimed was responsible for $10,000 in drug sales per month.

Imprisoning that Johnstown street dealer for five years will cost taxpayers $113,115, based on the average cost of $22,623 annually to house a federal prisoner. He was one of six people netted during a drug crackdown in that small former steel town located in the mountains 66 miles east of Pittsburgh.

Alarming evidence of the Drug War farce – the prosecutorial pounding of small fry while major players get a pass – is evident in statistics from the U.S. Sentencing Commission, the federal agency that advises Congress on criminal sentencing matters.

During 2009, in the Southern Florida district where Miami is located, 96.1 percent of the 669 persons convicted in federal courts for drug trafficking received prison time. Twenty-percent of the persons convicted in Southern Florida federal courts for simply possessing drugs received prison time.

Of the 67 persons convicted of money laundering during 2009 in those same Southern Florida courts, 77.6% went to prison, according to U.S. Sentencing Commission statistics.

As noted in that April 2011 article in The Observer, the conclusion of the Wachovia case “was only the tip of an iceberg, demonstrating the role of the “legal” banking sector in swilling hundreds of billions of dollars – the blood money from the murderous drug trade in Mexico and other places in the world – around their global operations, now bailed out by the taxpayer.”

That Observer article included observations made in 2008 by the then head of the United Nations office on drugs and crime providing evidence suggesting that drug/crime money was “the only liquid investment capital” available to banks on the brink of collapse.

“Inter-bank loans were funded by money that originated from the drug trade,” the Observer article quoted the U.N. official as stating. “There were signs that some banks were rescued that way.”

The June 2010 Bloomberg News article provided an ominous observation about the wrist-slap protection large banks receive from criminal indictments due to a variant of the too-big-to-fail theory:

“Indicting a big bank could trigger a mad dash by investors to dump shares and cause panic in financial markets," says Jack Blum, a U.S. Senate investigator for 14 years and a consultant to international banks and brokerage firms on money laundering. The theory is like a get-out-of-jail free card for big banks, Blum says.

Another anti-money laundering expert disappointed with the federal government’s settlement with Wachovia is Robert Mazur, identified in the Observer article as one of the world’s “foremost figures” in providing anti-money laundering training and the point-man for US law enforcement during prosecutions against Columbian drug cartels two decades ago.

Mazur told The Observer, “The only thing that will make the banks properly vigilant to what is happening is when they hear the rattle of handcuffs in the boardroom.”


Copyright © Borderland Beat





And what does this mean on the ground?


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/ma ... ern-states

Mexican drug battle leaves 28 dead

Police discover dead men on federal highway in Nayarit while scores of villagers flee their homes in Michoacán
Associated Press
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 26 May 2011 11.59 BST

Image
Mexican soldiers carry out an anti-drugs operation in Monclova, Mexico. Photograph: Semar/EPA


Fierce fighting among apparent rival drug gangs in western Mexico has left 28 people dead on a highway, while in a nearby state more than 700 people fled villages that have become battlegrounds.

The violence, which appeared to be unrelated, escalated on Wednesday in the western states of Nayarit and Michoacán, where drug cartels have been warring over territory.

Police in Nayarit were initially responding to a complaint of a kidnapping by a group of armed men who escaped on a federal highway near the town of Ruiz, when they heard a report of a shootout, according to the state prosecutor's office.

They found 28 men lying dead and four others wounded, as well as bullet casings from high-powered weapons and 10 abandoned vehicles.

The statement released late on Wednesday by the attorney general's office gave no further details.

Earlier in the day, an official in the nearby western state of Michoacán said drug cartel violence had prompted frightened villagers to flee hamlets and take refuge at shelters set up at a church hall, recreation centre and schools.

It is at least the second time a large number of rural residents have been displaced by drug violence in Mexico. In November, about 400 people in the northern border town of Ciudad Mier took refuge in the neighbouring city of Ciudad Aleman following gun battles.

The Michoacán state civil defence director, Carlos Mandujano, said about 700 people spent Tuesday night at a water park in the town of Buenavista Tomatlan, with most sleeping under open thatched-roof structures.

Mandujano said state authorities were providing sleeping mats, blankets and food.

Residents told local authorities that gun battles between rival drug cartels had made it too dangerous for them to stay in outlying hamlets. The latest reports said arsonists were burning avocado farms in the nearby town of Acahuato.

The fighting in Michoacán is believed to involve rival factions of the La Familia drug cartel, some of whose members now call themselves "the Knights Templar".

Drug violence has been on the rise in Nayarit, a Pacific coast state known for its surfing and beach towns. In October, gunmen killed 15 people at a car wash in the capital of Tepic, an attack that police said bore the characteristics of organised crime. The bodies of 12 murder victims, eight of them partially burned, were found on a dirt road in Nayarit last year. Officials have not identified the gangs fighting there.

The Norway-based Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre estimates about 230,000 people in Mexico have been driven from their homes by the violence, often to stay with relatives or in the US.




Whitney on same, today:


http://counterpunch.org/whitney06012011.html

June 1, 2011

"Business is Booming"
Wall Street's Role in Narco-Trafficking


By MIKE WHITNEY


Imagine what your reaction would be if the Mexican government agreed to pay Barack Obama $1.4 billion to deploy US troops and armored vehicles to New York, Los Angeles and Chicago to conduct military operations, set up check points, and engage in fire-fights that end up killing 35,000 US civilians on the streets of American cities.

If the Mexican government treated the United States like this, would you consider them a friend or an enemy?

This is exactly how the US is treating Mexico, and it's been going on since 2006.

America's Mexican policy--The Merida Initiative--is a nightmare. It's undermined Mexican sovereignty, corrupted the political system, and militarized the country. It's also resulted in the violent deaths of thousands of mostly poor civilians. But Washington doesn't give a hoot about "collateral damage" as long as it can sell more weaponry, strengthen its free-trade regime, and sluice more drug profits into its big banks. Then everything is just Jim-dandy.

There's no point in dignifying this butchery by calling it a "War on Drugs"?

That's nonsense. What we're seeing is a giant powergrab by big business, big finance and the US Intel services. Obama is merely doing their bidding, which is why--not surprisingly--things have gotten a lot worse under his administration. Obama has not only stepped up the funding for Plan Mexico (aka--Merida) but also deployed more US agents to work undercover while US drones carry out surveillance duty. Get the picture? This isn't some little drug bust; it's another chapter in America's War on Civilization.

Here's an excerpt from an article in CounterPunch by Laura Carlsen that gives a little background:

"The drug war has become the major vehicle of militarization in Latin America. It's a vehicle funded and driven by the U.S. government and fueled by a combination of false morals, hypocrisy and a lot of cold, hard fear. The so called ‘war on drugs’ is really a war on people, especially youth, women, indigenous peoples and dissidents. The drug war has become the main way for the Pentagon to occupy and control countries at the expense of whole societies and many, many lives.

“Militarization in the name of the drug war is happening more quickly and more thoroughly than most of us probably anticipated under the Obama administration. The agreement to establish bases in Colombia, later suspended, sent out one of the first signals of the strategy. And we've seen the indefinite extension of the Merida Initiative in Mexico and Central America, and even, sadly, war boats sent to Costa Rica, a nation with a history of peace and no army...

“The Merida Initiative funds U.S. interests to train security forces, provide intelligence and war technology, give advice on reforming the justice and penal systems and promoting human rights–all in Mexico.” (The Drug War Can't Be Improved, It Can Only be Ended, Laura Carlsen, Counterpunch)


If it looks like Obama is doing his best to turn Mexico into a military dictatorship, it's because he is. Plan Mexico is a sham that conceals the administration's real motives, which is to make sure that the lavish profits from the drug trade end up in the right people's pockets. That's what this is all about, big money. And that's why the death toll has soared while the Mexican government's credibility has hit its lowest ebb in decades. US policy has turned large swaths of the country into killing fields and it's only getting worse.

Check out this interview with Charles Bowden who describes what life is like for the people who live at Ground Zero in the drug war; Juarez, Mexico:

"This is in a city where people live in cardboard boxes sometimes. Ten thousand businesses have given up and closed in the last year. Thirty to sixty thousand people from Juárez, mainly the rich, have moved across the river to El Paso for safety, including the mayor of Juárez, who likes to bunk in El Paso. And the publisher of the newspaper there lives in El Paso. Somewhere between 100,000 and 400,000 people simply left the city. A lot of the problem is economic, not simply violence. At least 100,000 jobs in the border factories have vanished during this recession because of the competition from Asia. There’s 500 to 900 gangs there, estimates vary.

“So what you have is about 10,000 federal troops and federal police agents all marauding. You have a city where no one goes out at night; where small businesses all pay extortion; where 20,000 cars were officially stolen last year; where 2,600-plus people were officially murdered last year; where nobody keeps track of the people who have been kidnapped and never come back; where nobody counts the people buried in secret burying grounds, and they, in an unseemly way, claw out of the earth from time to time. You’ve got a disaster. And you have a million people, too poor to leave, imprisoned in it. That’s the city." (Charles Bowden, Democracy Now)


This isn't about drugs; it's about a crackpot foreign policy that supports proxy-armies to impose order through police-state repression and militarization. It's about expanding US power and beefing up profits on Wall Street.

Here's more background from author Lawrence M. Vance at the The Future of Freedom Foundation:

"An undisclosed number of U.S. law-enforcement agents work in Mexico... The DEA has more than 60 agents in Mexico. There are in addition 40 Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, 20 Marshal Service deputies, and 18 Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives agents, plus agents from the FBI, Citizen and Immigration Service, Customs and Border Protection, Secret Service, Coast Guard, and Transportation Safety Agency. The State Department also maintains a Narcotics Affairs Section. The United States has also provided helicopters, drug sniffing dogs, and polygraph units to screen law-enforcement applicants.

“U.S. drones spy on cartel hideouts, and U.S. tracking beacons pinpoint suspectS’ cars and phones. U.S. agents track beacons, trace cell-phone calls, read e-mails, study behavioral patterns of border incursions, follow smuggling routes, and process data about drug dealers, money launderers, and cartel bosses. According to a former Mexican anti-drug prosecutor, U.S. agents are not restricted from eavesdropping on anyone in Mexico by U.S. laws that require judicial authority as long as they are not on U.S. territory and not bugging American citizens. ("Why Is the U.S. Fighting Mexico's Drug War?" Laurence M. Vance, The Future of Freedom Foundation)


This isn't foreign policy; it's another US occupation. And, guess who's raking in the big cashola on this sordid little scam? Wall Street. That's right, the big banks are getting their cut just like they always do. Take a look at this excerpt from an article by James Petras titled "How Drug Profits saved Capitalism" at Global Research. It's a great summary of the objectives that are shaping the policy:

"While the Pentagon arms the Mexican government and the US Drug Enforcement Agency enforces the ‘military solution’, the biggest US banks receive, launder and transfer hundreds of billions of dollars to the drug lords’ accounts, who then buy modern arms, pay private armies of assassins and corrupt untold numbers of political and law enforcement officials on both sides of the border....

“Drug profits, in the most basic sense, are secured through the ability of the cartels to launder and transfer billions of dollars through the US banking system. The scale and scope of the US banking-drug cartel alliance surpasses any other economic activity of the US private banking system. According to US Justice Department records, one bank alone, Wachovia Bank (now owned by Wells Fargo), laundered $378.3 billion dollars between May 1, 2004 and May 31, 2007 (The Guardian, May 11, 2011). Every major bank in the US has served as an active financial partner of the murderous drug cartels...

“If the major US banks are the financial engines which allow the billion dollar drug empires to operate, the White House, the US Congress and the law enforcement agencies are the basic protectors of these banks.....Laundering drug money is one of the most lucrative sources of profit for Wall Street; the banks charge hefty commissions on the transfer of drug profits, which they then lend to borrowing institutions at interest rates far above what – if any – they pay to drug trafficker depositors. Awash in sanitized drug profits, these US titans of the finance world can easily buy their own elected officials to perpetuate the system. ("How Drug Profits saved Capitalism" , James Petras, Global Research)


Repeat: "Every major bank in the US has served as an active financial partner of the murderous drug cartels..."

The War on Drugs is a fraud. This isn't about interdiction; it's about control. Washington provides the muscle so the banks can rake in the big doe. One hand washes the other, just like the Mafia.

Mike Whitney lives in Washington state. He can be reached at fergiewhitney@msn.com



Borerland Beat has excellent and comprehensive coverage of the Mexican drug war, but an editorial position in favor, with qualifications. Basically, they're hyping the evil of the cartel lords to the extent where a rational drug policy would allow them to take over the country, which I think is bullshit. Their power has grown immeasurably since 2006, as a direct result of Calderon and Plan Merida, and if the drug revenues dry up, so will most of their power.

But they say the war will never end, and the bottom line for why is simple: The US will intervene militarily!


http://www.borderlandbeat.com/2011/05/w ... -2012.html

What Mexico Will Look Like in 2012?
Friday, May 27, 2011 | Borderland Beat Reporter Gari

By Louis E.V. Nevaer
New America Media

In recent weeks, hundreds of thousands of Mexicans have taken to the streets in peaceful marches in scores of cities calling for an end to President Felipe Calderón’s war on drugs.

The protests reflect growing dissatisfaction among the public with Calderón’s drug war that has exacerbated rather than curtailed narco-violence.

This sentiment has been echoed by journalists as well. Jorge Ramos, the lead news anchor for Univision, has gone on record as saying, “Calderón’s strategy [against the drug cartels], which has cost more than 34,000 lives in the last four years, has been an utter failure.”

A failure to stem the violence has catapulted public safety to the top of the list of voters’ concerns ahead of next year’s elections in Mexico, trumping even the economy.Calderón will be termed out, but there is mounting pressure for would-be presidential hopefuls to declare that, if elected, they would call off the war on drugs.

But as 2012 nears, does Mexico have a choice?

It does not.

Is Calderón’s drug war working?

It’s one thing to criticize the war on drugs and another to offer a viable solution. To his credit, Calderón has recognized errors in his campaign against the drug cartels, and, of even more significance, he has, time and again, invited anyone anywhere to offer a viable alternative.

This modesty has been acknowledged by critics. Writing in Milenio newspaper, Hector Aguilar conceded that, “there is nobody proposing an alternative to Calderón's strategy."

By contrast, there are many who compare Mexico’s current campaign with that of Colombia’s more than a decade ago, and are optimistic. Mexican and U.S. officials, for instance, argue that Calderón’s policies are proving effective, as measured in drugs seized, money confiscated, drug lords arrested or slain and the constant disruption to the cartels’ organizations that has forced them to set up operations in the United States, Central America and as far away as Malaysia and West Africa.

This is how Katherine Corcoran of the Associated Press summed up the situation last month: “Mexican drug cartels now operate virtually uninhibited in their Central American backyard. U.S.-supported crackdowns in Mexico and Colombia have only pushed traffickers into a region where corruption is rampant, borders lack even minimal immigration control and local gangs provide a ready-made infrastructure for organized crime.” The price of this “success” has been, as Ramos points out with anguish -- violence.

But as Mexicans begin to think about next year’s elections, there is the sobering reality that no matter who is elected president, the war on drugs may be tweaked, but it won’t be abandoned.

Mexico pivotal to global drug trade

Why? Because in an increasingly interdependent world, Mexico has obligations to the international community to participate fully in stopping the global drug trade.

More importantly, Mexico has the United States as a neighbor – which is both the world’s largest consumer of illegal drugs, and a militaristic nation that, with impunity, takes actions against nations it deems a national security threat.

Quite simply, regardless of the sentiments of poets and journalists – and everyday citizens who march peacefully through the streets of Mexican cities – the government has no choice in the matter.

There are two fundamental reasons why Mexico’s next president will stay the course.

Foremost is the matter of national sovereignty. It is unthinkable for Mexico to establish a quid pro quo, where the military’s campaign stops and the cartels cease their violence. The idea of having the Mexican state co-exist with nebulous geographic regions under the control of organized criminal syndicates is not in the cards. The last time Mexico relinquished jurisdiction over its geography, it emboldened foreign settlers to establish a breakaway republic – the Republic of Texas.

In more practical terms, should Mexico’s next president want to reach an agreement in which there were no more kidnappings, in return for the army returning to their barracks, with whom would he negotiate? Most of the “most wanted” drug lords are dead, have been arrested, sent to the United States for trial, or have fled Mexico and set up shop in other countries.

Secondly, what would happen if in 2012, Mexico decided to turn a blind eye and allow cartels to operate with impunity in the northern states, in exchange for an end to kidnappings, shootouts and violence?

U.S. won’t stand for rogue state

The United States wouldn’t stand for a rogue state to coexist alongside Mexico’s legitimate government. The United States launches cruise missiles into the Sudan, occupies Iraq, and initiates war in Afghanistan. In addition, since 2001 financial laws have changed around the world – in a desperate bid to stop the flow of narco-dollars into the global banking system. All one has to do is recall that last March, Wachovia, now part of Wells Fargo, settled the biggest action brought under the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act and "deferred prosecution" by paying federal authorities $110 million in forfeitures. The DEA and IRS accused Wachovia of laundering billions of dollars for Mexican drug cartels. If federal officials are this relentless in prosecuting American corporations linked with drug traffickers, --


Sorry to interrupt a sentence but that's some kind of joke, right? They write, BILLIONS of dollars laundered, and a $110 million forfeiture after years of this is RELENTLESS?! That's a minor business expense. Furthermore, the contrast between the favorable treatment of the banksters, who rake in the greatest portion of the profit of any other actor, and of Mexican drug dealers is illuminating.

-- think of the retaliatory actions that the U.S. government would pursue should it conclude that Mexico represents a “national security threat.”


But the idea that the US will turn Mexico into the next Afpak over this is all-too realistic.

In other words, if Mexico’s next president abandons Calderón’s drug war, as Ramos suggests, then Mexico could easily be declared a “rogue state” that threatens the “national security interests” of the United States, always a precursor to economic and military actions.

In the best-case scenario, Mexico would then be subjected to financial havoc as American authorities move to seize bank accounts used by the drug cartels to launder their money, paralyzing Mexico’s financial system. In a worst-case scenario, Mexico may itself be occupied militarily by the United States.

No one in Mexico likes waking up to horrible news about violence, slayings and the relentless viciousness that’s going on every day. Then again, I suspect everyone in the United States is tired of waking up and hearing about Guantanamo detainees, car bombs in Iraq and the never-ending pursuit of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan.

Indeed, critics like Ramos are naïvely offering an absurd alternative: That Mexico pursue a policy that will surrender its sovereignty to rogue criminal organizations, force the United States to declare it a rogue nation that threatens its national security interests, subject Mexico to economic sanctions and the possibility of being occupied (once more) by the United States. In the same way that Barack Obama has found it impossible to close down Guantanamo, so will Mexico’s next president find it impossible to end the war on drugs.

We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 15983
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: War on Drugs, Money Laundry and Plan (Destroy) Mexico

Postby hanshan » Thu Jun 02, 2011 3:32 pm

Anyway, why you hounding Hulk now? You know what my point is, and it's that EVEN THESE GUYS ARE SAYING IT! As you say, Zedillo: Even with legalization (in 30 years, sadly) no one's coming after his proceeds, he can be fairly sure. Ronald Reagan's George Schultz. Volker. A Goldman head. Even these guys are saying it.

How nice to be retired and really old, and able to say the occasional truth. Papandreou's the only sitting official, and my feeling that they're hypocrites is probably about to be confirmed by Greece's total failure to take any action on drug reform in the next few years. Still, hypocrites or no, even these guys are saying it! And they are not presenting a middle-of-the-road faux reform position. They're saying, drug war has failed, period. And: legalize marijuana and try legalizing everything else.


Just a snit, I guess. It rubbed me the wrong way when I saw Fuentes & Llosa dismissed w/ a throwaway line for the most part, & because they were conflated, within the same concept, they can therefore be discounted as just another of the UN flunkies. &, w/in the common mind, that's how folks would interpret it. Anyways, it's a non-starter. Nobody listens to the UN. It doesn't even qualify w/ peanut gallery status.

No time for lit, Jack, I'm sure; they are very fine writers.

...& be able to say the occasional truth. (heh)

your stuff is great - no qualms



That's nonsense. What we're seeing is a giant powergrab by big business, big finance and the US Intel services. Obama is merely doing their bidding, which is why--not surprisingly--things have gotten a lot worse under his administration. Obama has not only stepped up the funding for Plan Mexico (aka--Merida) but also deployed more US agents to work undercover while US drones carry out surveillance duty. Get the picture? This isn't some little drug bust; it's another chapter in America's War on Civilization.

If it looks like Obama is doing his best to turn Mexico into a military dictatorship, it's because he is. Plan Mexico is a sham that conceals the administration's real motives, which is to make sure that the lavish profits from the drug trade end up in the right people's pockets. That's what this is all about, big money. And that's why the death toll has soared while the Mexican government's credibility has hit its lowest ebb in decades. US policy has turned large swaths of the country into killing fields and it's only getting worse.

This isn't about drugs; it's about a crackpot foreign policy that supports proxy-armies to impose order through police-state repression and militarization. It's about expanding US power and beefing up profits on Wall Street.

This isn't foreign policy; it's another US occupation. And, guess who's raking in the big cashola on this sordid little scam? Wall Street. That's right, the big banks are getting their cut just like they always do. Take a look at this excerpt from an article by James Petras titled "How Drug Profits saved Capitalism" at Global Research. It's a great summary of the objectives that are shaping the policy:

Repeat: "Every major bank in the US has served as an active financial partner of the murderous drug cartels..."

The War on Drugs is a fraud. This isn't about interdiction; it's about control. Washington provides the muscle so the banks can rake in the big doe. One hand washes the other, just like the Mafia.



the above
is from Whitney's article & he's spot on


...
hanshan
 
Posts: 1673
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 5:04 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: War on Drugs, Money Laundry and Plan (Destroy) Mexico

Postby Nordic » Thu Jun 02, 2011 4:18 pm

We can't have an end to any war. Somehow it's gotten to the point that "ending war" is the same as "failure". Even if we win.

The battle between Good and Evil never ends, right? Satan is always out there ......

Wars must continue if we are to be Good.
"He who wounds the ecosphere literally wounds God" -- Philip K. Dick
Nordic
 
Posts: 14230
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 3:36 am
Location: California USA
Blog: View Blog (6)

Re: War on Drugs, Money Laundry and Plan (Destroy) Mexico

Postby 8bitagent » Thu Jun 02, 2011 4:39 pm

I posted this in a "liberal" forum a few weeks ago when I was accused of making up the claim that the CIA/west is still connected to drug smuggling

Wells Fargo's Wachovia Bank Caught Behind the Mexican Drug Cartel money to the tune of 384 billion dollars:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/03/us-bank-mexico-drug-gangs

UN official: drug money kept banks afloat after 2008 crash
http://www.guardian.co.uk/global/2009/d ... ief-claims

Top Afghan drug lord on CIA payroll
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/ ... 62,00.html

Top Mexican Drug Lord: I work for the CIA
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index ... 704AAkF3Kw

Fox News: US military protecting and helping cultivation of heroin poppys


Former DEA head admits CIA involved in drug smuggling
"Do you know who I am? I am the arm, and I sound like this..."-man from another place, twin peaks fire walk with me
User avatar
8bitagent
 
Posts: 12243
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 6:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: War on Drugs, Money Laundry and Plan (Destroy) Mexico

Postby gnosticheresy_2 » Thu Jun 02, 2011 5:02 pm

JackRiddler wrote:.

I had no idea that the United Nations appointed a Global Commission on Drug Policy consisting of Kofi Annan, Paul Volcker, Papandreou (the current Greek PM), Louise Arbour, Branson, Carlos Fuentes, Zedillo (the former Mexican president), Gaviria (former Colombian president), Javier Solana, Cardoso (former Brazilian president and chair of the Commission), Mario Vargas Llosa, even George Fucking Schultz (vice-chair) and former Goldman Sachs head John Whitehead... for the most part a rogues' gallery of conservatives, bankers and neoliberals.


Their political affiliation is irrelevant. They're allowed to speak truth to power, because they used to be power but no longer have any significant power, and they therefore know nothing will be done. If there is ever de facto (or even de jure - now there's a thought!) legalisation of currently illegal drugs in "The West", it will be one of the final breaks in the chain, not one of the first.
User avatar
gnosticheresy_2
 
Posts: 532
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:07 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests