So here you go, what do you say to Professor Jones?If any of the posters don't know who the Phil Jones is who sent this email, then don't embarrass yourself posting here, for it's emails like this which show unambiguously that the principal scientists behind the global warming scare campaign were not only aware that the data coming in on temperature was not matching their rhetoric, and therefore not only corrupted the scientific peer review process to lock out other scientists whose scientific papers contradicted the AGW theme, but also 'hid the decline' when and as appropriate.
So try to understand that team
'skeptics' include genuine climate cientists who are determined to lift the veil of deceit covering this whole sorry saga of corrupted science.
http://di2.nu/foia/foia2011/mail/4195.txt(note..you will have to do a page search to get to this specific email)
[mailto:p.jones@uea.ac.uk]
From: Phil Jones
>Sent: 05 January 2009 16:18
>To: Johns, Tim; Folland, Chris
>Cc: Smith, Doug; Johns, Tim
>Subject: Re: FW: Temperatures in 2009
>
>
> Tim, Chris,
> I hope you're not right about the lack of warming lasting
> till about 2020.
. I'd rather hoped to see the earlier Met Office
> press release with Doug's paper that said something like -
> half the years to 2014 would exceed the warmest year currently on
> record, 1998!
>
Still a way to go before 2014.>
Now right through this thread, the true believers go bananas when it has been quoted (with link generally) by a skeptic that there has been a lack of global warming in recent times.
So here you go, what do you say to Professor Jones ?
And it seems to me that all of you AGW true believers, like Professor Jones, also
'hope' that it doesn't continue until 2020.
For the definition of an AGW true believer, aka a AGW alarmist, here is one which I posted in an earlier thread and post again below.
So please confirm my intuitive astuteness, or prove to me that I am biased, by confirming that you are not like Professor Jones and actually do hope that it is the AGW team that is wrong! You can easily tell the difference between an Environmentalist and an AGW alarmist.
If someone is a true environmentalist whose vision is for a healthy planet into the future, then he is one who celebrates when the recent climate data show the AGW alarmist’s predictions of catastrophic warming might be wrong.
The AGW alarmist/denier on the other hand though, usually an eco/political activist, always denies new data that shows the planet may be not as unstable as first believed after all. The Media usually defines deniers as those who deny the AGW scientist’s computer model predictions. However, denying the measured climate data meets a better definition in the world of science.