Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
justdrew » 24 Jul 2013 23:03 wrote:he's right about Syria, but he's questionable in many other ways. sandyhoaxer + jews-did-911 render him useless. He says Newton is a "satanist center" here. Same video he claims Iraq was 'disarmed' and that's why they couldn't defend themselves.
a stopped clock is right twice a day. I consider it VERY possible this guy is a tool. for Who?
because he's painting a VERY shitty picture of anti-war pro-justice people.
slimmouse » Thu Jul 25, 2013 12:34 pm wrote:I guess youre right AD and solace.
This religious programming catches even the most passionately humanitarian of us it seems.
Its seems that courtesy of the orgainised religion scam all humanity consequently has to take it up the ass, whilst the tiny few, the likes of whom created such nonsense, use it against us, ensuring that our taxation buys weapons for wars that no decent human being really wants.
Lee Kaplin has a summary of the divide and conquer/distract from the issue argument in the very first video- that is when he was actually prepared to commentate on the debate, as opposed to the life history of Ken OKeefe.
To paraphrase, Kaplin with due exaggeration. - "see, theres the sunis and the Shia, and the Kurds and the Wazuki, and the Grypchtok and everyone else to consder here.
Hunanity sadly gets lost in the mix, which is of course what is supposed to occur when the likes of Kaplin are theorizing.
American Dream » 25 Jul 2013 17:40 wrote:slimmouse » Thu Jul 25, 2013 12:34 pm wrote:I guess youre right AD and solace.
This religious programming catches even the most passionately humanitarian of us it seems.
Its seems that courtesy of the orgainised religion scam all humanity consequently has to take it up the ass, whilst the tiny few, the likes of whom created such nonsense, use it against us, ensuring that our taxation buys weapons for wars that no decent human being really wants.
Lee Kaplin has a summary of the divide and conquer/distract from the issue argument in the very first video- that is when he was actually prepared to commentate on the debate, as opposed to the life history of Ken OKeefe.
To paraphrase, Kaplin with due exaggeration. - "see, theres the sunis and the Shia, and the Kurds and the Wazuki, and the Grypchtok and everyone else to consder here.
Hunanity sadly gets lost in the mix, which is of course what is supposed to occur when the likes of Kaplin are theorizing.
You're at Rigorous Intuition, dude. You don't think we can imagine any more conspiratorial explanations for the endless parade of clowns who claim to champion Palestinian/Human Liberation but actually don't?
Maybe he gets donations from his good buddy, David Duke.
Users browsing this forum: Grizzly and 161 guests