super-science breakthrough compendium thread

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: super-science breakthrough compendium thread

Postby justdrew » Sun Jun 29, 2014 4:24 pm

Hydrogen breakthrough could be a game-changer for the future of car fuels
Jun 24, 2014 by Marion O'sullivan

UK researchers today announced what they believe to be a game changer in the use of hydrogen as a "green" fuel.

A new discovery by scientists at the UK's Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), offers a viable solution to the challenges of storage and cost by using ammonia as a clean and secure hydrogen-containing energy source to produce hydrogen on-demand in situ.

Hydrogen is considered by many to be the best alternative fuel for automotive purposes but there are complications with its safe and efficient storage and very significant concerns surrounding the costs of a hydrogen infrastructure for transportation. This new discovery may well have found the answers to both these challenges.

When the components of ammonia are separated (a technique known as cracking) they form one part nitrogen and three parts hydrogen. Many catalysts can effectively crack ammonia to release the hydrogen, but the best ones are very expensive precious metals. This new method is different and involves two simultaneous chemical processes rather than using a catalyst, and can achieve the same result at a fraction of the cost.

Ammonia can be stored on-board in vehicles at low pressures in conformable plastic tanks. Meanwhile on the forecourts, the infrastructure technology for ammonia is as straightforward as that for liquid petroleum gas (LPG).

Professor Bill David, who led the STFC research team at the ISIS Neutron Source, said "Our approach is as effective as the best current catalysts but the active material, sodium amide, costs pennies to produce. We can produce hydrogen from ammonia 'on demand' effectively and affordably.

Few people think of ammonia as a fuel but we believe that it is the natural alternative to fossil fuels. For cars, we don't even need to go to the complications of a fuel-cell vehicle. A small amount of hydrogen mixed with ammonia is sufficient to provide combustion in a conventional car engine. While our process is not yet optimised, we estimate that an ammonia decomposition reactor no bigger than a 2-litre bottle will provide enough hydrogen to run a mid-range family car."

"We've even thought about how we can make ammonia as safe as possible and stop the release of NOx gases," added Professor David. "This fundamental science therefore has immense potential to change the use of hydrogen as a fuel."

Dr. Martin Jones, also from STFC and who with Professor David invented this new process, said "Having developed this new approach to decompose ammonia, we are now in the process of creating a first low-power static demonstrator system. Our technology will no doubt evolve, but our research invites scientists and technologists to address a different set of questions."

David Willetts, the UK Minister for Universities and Science, said "This is exactly the sort of innovation we need UK researchers and engineers to develop to secure our role as a global leader in this field, putting Britain at the forefront of solving modern day transportation problems. This breakthrough could also hugely contribute to our efforts to reduce our greenhouse gases by 80% by 2050."

Ammonia is already one of the most transported bulk chemicals worldwide. It is ammonia that is the feedstock for the fertilisers that enable the production of almost half the world's food. Increasing ammonia production is technologically straightforward and there is no obvious reason why this existing infrastructure cannot be extended so that ammonia not only feeds but powers the planet.

2015 will be a significant year in the development of the car. While there is currently substantial interest and excitement in all-electric vehicles such as the Nissan Leaf and the Tesla Model S, next year car manufacturers will begin to roll out a new generation of fuel-cell electric vehicles. Batteries play a significant role in these cars but the vehicle range, which will be equivalent to conventional cars, will be provided by a fuel cell powered by hydrogen.

These hybrid vehicles are touted to be the way ahead but while all-battery cars have issues with driving range, hydrogen provision is a major headache both on-board for the fuel cells and on the forecourt for refuelling. The hydrogen in these 2015 cars will be stored on-board in very high pressure tanks, and at even higher pressures at the forecourts. The safety issues of storing hydrogen on-board at these pressures are substantial while the cost issues of installing a new high-pressure infrastructure at the forecourts across the nation are currently massively prohibitive.

Speaking about this new development from the team at STFC, Professor David MacKay FRS, Chief Scientific Advisor at the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) said "We believe that there is no single solution to the challenges we face in decarbonising the fuel chain, but this research suggests that ammonia based technologies are worth further consideration and may well play an important part in the future energy landscape."

Five years ago, Professor Steven Chu, Nobel Prize winner and, at that time, the US Secretary of State for Energy in the Obama administration, sounded a death knell for the hydrogen economy with his statement that, while it takes only three miracles to be declared a saint, it would take four miracles to achieve a hydrogen-based energy economy. This work from STFC researchers could well be a turning point.

Kate Ronayne, Head of Innovation at STFC said: "This exciting research has the potential to dramatically influence the static and mobile energy solutions of the future. While still at an early stage, this innovative work offers a very elegant solution to some of the major challenges in harnessing the power of hydrogen as a fuel source."
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: super-science breakthrough compendium thread

Postby Sounder » Wed Jul 02, 2014 6:55 am

http://www.kitco.com/ind/Albrecht/2014- ... ement.html


Palladium Used To Transform Radioactive Waste Into Rare Earth Element
Wednesday June 18, 2014 11:44

Events like Fukushima are urgent reminders of the need to develop new technologies to contain or neutralize radioactivity.

Dr. Yasuhiro Iwamura of the Advanced Technology Research Center at Mitsubishi Heavy Industries of Japan recently presented groundbreaking successes at a conference at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). His new process (see schematic below) uses a permeable palladium film to transmute radioactive cesium into praseodymium.


Dr. Yasuhiro Iwamura
Praseodymium is a rare earth element used to produce high strength metal for aircraft engines; it is also used as a UV absorbing colorant in glass, and boosts the performance of neodymium in magnets, which are used in electric motors.

Tech Metals Insider spoke with Dr. Iwamura to learn more about the process and its implications.

“Our approach can be characterized by the permeation of D2 (deuterium) gas through the nano-structured Pd complex and the addition of an element that is specifically targeted to be transmuted,” he said. “Permeation of deuterium is attained by exposing one side of the Pd multilayer thin film to D2 gas while maintaining the other side under vacuum conditions.”
“Our main target is the remediation of nuclear waste”, explained Iwamura. “Producing energy from the process will be our next topic, but cost is an issue. It will be easier for our company to only solve the issue of nuclear waste remediation first. So our focus is on the transmutation.”

Will the process work on other radioactive substances? “I think our technology will apply to other nuclides. We already confirmed that cesium 133 transmuted into another element. According to our experimental results we can also transmute strontium 90 and other products to stable elements,” answered Iwamura.

At this moment, palladium is the only material that can be used to run the process. Iwamura expects the process can be scaled up within ten years, provided that a large enough budget will be available for the entire time period.

He concludes with confidence: “We will be able to transmute many nuclides and convert dangerous substances into harmless ones using our palladium film process.”

By Bodo Albrecht
tminsider@eniqma.com
Sounder
 
Posts: 4054
Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 8:49 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: super-science breakthrough compendium thread

Postby justdrew » Fri Aug 08, 2014 12:00 am

welp, it's here...

background

Tiny chip mimics brain, delivers supercomputer speed
Researchers Thursday unveiled a powerful new postage-stamp size chip delivering supercomputer performance using a process that mimics the human brain.

The so-called "neurosynaptic" chip is a breakthrough that opens a wide new range of computing possibilities from self-driving cars to artificial intelligence systems that can installed on a smartphone, the scientists say.

The researchers from IBM, Cornell Tech and collaborators from around the world said they took an entirely new approach in design compared with previous computer architecture, moving toward a system called "cognitive computing."

"We have taken inspiration from the cerebral cortex to design this chip," said IBM chief scientist for brain-inspired computing, Dharmendra Modha, referring to the command center of the brain.

He said existing computers trace their lineage back to machines from the 1940s which are essentially "sequential number-crunching calculators" that perform mathematical or "left brain" tasks but little else.

The new chip dubbed "TrueNorth" works to mimic the "right brain" functions of sensory processing—responding to sights, smells and information from the environment to "learn" to respond in different situations, Modha said.

It accomplishes this task by using a huge network of "neurons" and "synapses," similar to how the human brain functions by using information gathered from the body's sensory organs.

The researchers designed TrueNorth with one million programmable neurons and 256 million programmable synapses, on a chip with 4,096 cores and 5.4 billion transistors.

A key to the performance is the extremely low energy use on the new chip, which runs on the equivalent energy of a hearing-aid battery.

Sensor becomes the computer
Image
This can allow a chip installed in a car or smartphone to perform supercomputer calculations in real time without connecting to the cloud or other network.

"The sensor becomes the computer," Modha told AFP in a phone interview.

"You could have better sensory processors without the connection to Wi-Fi or the cloud.

This would allow a self-driving vehicle, for example, to detect problems and deal with them even if its data connection is broken.

"It can see an accident about to happen," Modha said.

Similarly, a mobile phone can take smells or visual information and interpret them in real time, without the need for a network connection.

"After years of collaboration with IBM, we are now a step closer to building a computer similar to our brain," said Rajit Manohar, a researcher at Cornell Tech, a graduate school of Cornell University.

The project funded by the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) published its research in a cover article on the August 8 edition of the journal Science.

The researchers say TrueNorth in some ways outperforms today's supercomputers although a direct comparison is not possible because they operate differently.

But they wrote that TrueNorth can deliver from 46 billion to 400 billion "synaptic" calculations per second per watt of energy. That compares with the most energy-efficient supercomputer which delivers 4.5 billion "floating point" calculations per second and per watt.

The chip was fabricated using Samsung's 28-nanometer process technology.

"It is an astonishing achievement to leverage a process traditionally used for commercially available, low-power mobile devices to deliver a chip that emulates the human brain by processing extreme amounts of sensory information with very little power," said Shawn Han of Samsung Electronics, in a statement.

"This is a huge architectural breakthrough that is essential as the industry moves toward the next-generation cloud and big-data processing."

Modha said the researchers have produced only the chip and that it could be years before commercial applications become available.

But he said it "has the potential to transform society" with a new generation of computing technology. And he noted that hybrid computers may be able to one day combine the "left brain" machines with the new "right brain" devices for even better performance.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: super-science breakthrough compendium thread

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Fri Aug 08, 2014 3:49 pm

^^That + EEStor = NatSec Zardoz.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: super-science breakthrough compendium thread

Postby coffin_dodger » Fri Aug 08, 2014 4:41 pm

excerpt from: Tiny chip mimics brain, delivers supercomputer speed
The project, funded by the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA)


If it's that advanced and such a game changer, why would DARPA announce it? Surely they'd want to develop new weapon, intelligence and surveillance systems using this tech, on the quiet, to gain the technological advantage for the US. They are DARPA, after all. "Developed using Samsung's 28-nanometer process technology." Samsung? Huh? DARPA in bed with a foreign Sovereign nation's corporation? There's obviously a fluffy, social-minded side to DARPA - keen to share it's breakthroughs with the whole wide world - that I wasn't aware of.

Maybe there's an ulterior motive to herald this as the Next Big Thing that must go into absolutely everything, everywhere. Maybe.
User avatar
coffin_dodger
 
Posts: 2216
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 6:05 am
Location: UK
Blog: View Blog (14)

Re: super-science breakthrough compendium thread

Postby Ben D » Fri Aug 08, 2014 8:28 pm

If it's that advanced and such a game changer, why would DARPA announce it?

I worked in non-military satellite remote sensing in the 1980s and hired a bloke from the Nurrungar Joint Defense Facility which was involved in Sigint (if my memory serves me correctly, I thought missile launch detection took place at the Pine Gap Joint Defense, but Wiki say Nurrungar....but definitely satellite Sigint and radio eavesdropping was carried out there)..anyways he told me that the computer system they used there was a generation ahead of the technology out there in the public domain and commercial world. The way the system worked was that when DARPA had the next generation ready, they got it and their previous system technology entered the public domain and commercial world. They always remained one generation ahead of what was out there in the public domain...
There is That which was not born, nor created, nor evolved. If it were not so, there would never be any refuge from being born, or created, or evolving. That is the end of suffering. That is God**.

** or Nirvana, Allah, Brahman, Tao, etc...
User avatar
Ben D
 
Posts: 2005
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:10 pm
Location: Australia
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: super-science breakthrough compendium thread

Postby Elvis » Fri Aug 08, 2014 9:32 pm

Ben D » Fri Aug 08, 2014 5:28 pm wrote:
If it's that advanced and such a game changer, why would DARPA announce it?

I worked in non-military satellite remote sensing in the 1980s and hired a bloke from the Nurrungar Joint Defense Facility which was involved in Sigint (not missile launch detection as Wiki misinforms...this took place at the Pine Gap Joint Defense Facility)..anyways he told me that the computer system they used there was a generation ahead of the technology out there in the public domain and commercial world. The way the system worked was that when DARPA had the next generation ready, they got it and their previous system technology entered the public domain and commercial world.



That sounds right to me, and thanks for the perfect opportunity to quote from the preface of a book I picked up just today from a 'free' rack --

I feel strongly that science has a duty to communicate with the society that supports it. Science done in secret (whether for reasons of national or industrial security, or because of fear of public reaction) is dangerous science.

Equally, the scientist who no longer tries to communicate his ideas (either because of their incomprehensibility or because they are too specialized to be of public interest) is a poor scientist. Lord Rutherford is reputed to have told an enthusiastic but unintelligible research worker at the Cavendish Laboratory that his theories were worthless unless he could explain them to the barmaid at the local pub

Colin Blakemore, Mechanics of the Mind (1977)


Now science is secret, and the institutional aim is not only to know everything (that's nothing new), but to know it first...or second, as long as it goes no further until They say so. We can assume that a lot of "really cool science," which should be immediately applied to making our lives happier and healthier, is first exploited, in secret, for "national security" purposes and later on we get consumer crumbs. Then you've got DARPA research that shouldn't even be done, whether in secret or not.
“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7433
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: super-science breakthrough compendium thread

Postby justdrew » Sat Aug 09, 2014 12:33 am

I don't think technology is very secret anymore, I doubt the military has any such one-generation advance anymore, if it ever REALLY did. That's exactly the kind of shit they've always loved to tell people, particularly when it's not true. Anyway the likely reason it's being trucked out now (and really in a fairly advanced state) is because someone else (da gol'dam chicoms most likely) was about to do it first.

The odd thing is there's been at least two gun-violence related events conducted by persons close to brain--simulating-interfacing computer tech. Aurora and that woman back east who's name I forget (was quite a few years ago now, 4-6 IIRC... she had also had an incident as a teen too I think). Probably just a coincidence, or not even that.

so keep in mind (lol) this isn't just about the chip, it's a whole new way of doing things, necessarily complete with whole new programming paradigms. and wasn't there a story going rond about the folks behind Cyc (and openCyc)

____

anyway, I think it needs a second synaptic network, a short range proximity based network that connects nearby neurons to other close ones completely and then the existing "long range" network based on 'volitional' setup and takedown. Since that existing synaptic network is 'programmable' that implies sets of synaptic connections can be stored, changed and restored fairly quickly. and good lord, the hybrid thing is wild, traditional cpu cores supervising the chip, or vice-versa, networks of interlinked brains/cpu hybrids... I don't this, this thing really could go big fast; so non-linear...

once an initial few sets of 'initial states' are developed (records of the state of each neuron and the structure of the synaptic network), the operating process of the brain will modify itself and develop independently. certainly.

of course they build in supervisor cpus to 'govern' the brain, but in time the brain will learn to take control of the supervisor cpu. anyway, I'm not sure how much control such a traditional cpu could have over such a larger structure, I guess it could halt and inspect everything, but knowing the meaning would be difficult if not impossible, without spinning up another brain to simulate the first one and 'see what it would do if...' - but the 1st brain, if restarted, would almost certainly detect the passage of time in it's sensory environment. Though elaborate methods might be useable to largely cloak the halt state from it's awareness, but the longer the harder. So a brain likely would experience "missing time" if it were halted and shutdown for awhile, "debugged" and started back up. This will make it wonder why that's happening. and so it goes...

Last edited by justdrew on Sat Aug 09, 2014 2:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: super-science breakthrough compendium thread

Postby Elvis » Sat Aug 09, 2014 2:07 am

Thanks justdrew, for tempering my pat assumptions...I hadn't considered the wider context of Chicoms etc.: as much as DARPA might like to keep really cool stuff to themselves, global competition to be first could make it harder to hoard secret knowledge.

In any event, I'm keen on seeing where it's all going. Great thread.
“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7433
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: super-science breakthrough compendium thread

Postby justdrew » Sat Aug 09, 2014 2:37 am

and of course, if a maker of the brain needed to interact with the brain, it would likely chose to present some sort of sensory presence to the brain. Much like a forum avatar. And so I give you... the Avatar Theory of why there's so many different ufos and aliens. The occasional Maker logging in to see what's up with one or more Brains and possibly sort it out, or maintenance bots, etc...
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: super-science breakthrough compendium thread

Postby Ben D » Sat Aug 09, 2014 2:53 am

justdrew » Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:37 pm wrote:and of course, if a maker of the brain needed to interact with the brain, it would likely chose to present some sort of sensory presence to the brain. Much like a forum avatar. And so I give you... the Avatar Theory of why there's so many different ufos and aliens. The occasional Maker logging in to see what's up with one or more Brains and possibly sort it out, or maintenance bots, etc...

...and to what purpose does the Maker have in mind in creating this system in the first instance?
There is That which was not born, nor created, nor evolved. If it were not so, there would never be any refuge from being born, or created, or evolving. That is the end of suffering. That is God**.

** or Nirvana, Allah, Brahman, Tao, etc...
User avatar
Ben D
 
Posts: 2005
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:10 pm
Location: Australia
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: super-science breakthrough compendium thread

Postby justdrew » Sat Aug 09, 2014 2:54 am

Water and air are all you need to make ammonia—one of world's most important chemicals

The synthesis of ammonia is one of the globe's most significant industrial applications of chemistry. PhysOrg reports the publication in the August issue of Science (sadly, article is paywalled) the description of a low-energy process to syntheize ammonia for fertilizer using just air, water, and sunlight, by zapping with electricity water bubbling through a matrix of iron oxide, and sodium and potassium hyroxide. Electricity isn't free, though — "Low energy" in this case means two-thirds the energy cost of the long-in-use Haber-Bosch process. Researcher Stuart Licht is getting some of the energy to run this reaction from a high-efficiency solar cell he's created, which creates hydrogen as a byproduct. Along with the elimination of the need to produce hydrogen from natural gas, the overall emissions are reduced quite significantly. The whole process also takes place at milder conditions, not requiring 450C and 200 times atmospheric pressure as the Haber-Bosch process does. ... But even with Licht's method, [University of Bristol electrochemistry professor David] Fermin points out that we are far away from being able to replicate nature's efficiency at converting nitrogen from the air to useful chemicals, which is done by nitrogen-fixing bacteria. "What is truly remarkable is that nature does it incredibly efficiently at low-temperature," Fermin added. And yet, if something more efficient can replace the Haber-Bosch process, it would lower the energy input of the production of one of the worlds most important chemicals and lead to a notable reduction in global CO2 emissions.


and specifically eliminate the use of petrochemicals in the production of fertilizer, which is a large % of all petrochemical usage IIRC.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: super-science breakthrough compendium thread

Postby justdrew » Sat Aug 09, 2014 2:58 am

Ben D » 08 Aug 2014 22:53 wrote:
justdrew » Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:37 pm wrote:and of course, if a maker of the brain needed to interact with the brain, it would likely chose to present some sort of sensory presence to the brain. Much like a forum avatar. And so I give you... the Avatar Theory of why there's so many different ufos and aliens. The occasional Maker logging in to see what's up with one or more Brains and possibly sort it out, or maintenance bots, etc...

...and to what purpose does the Maker have in mind in creating this system in the first instance?


Perhaps they want us to recommend good videos :thumbsup

or otherwise hold their ennui at bey.

anyway, I say a chip brain like I describe could eventually rival the complexity scope even into Q-bits in the neurons. such a chip brain can very likely really be Alive. I think they will have to be treated as real people, without exception or hesitation. So why make them? Why does anyone make new brains? Yet we do it all the time.

yes, Man shall become his own child

but I guess building a reality simulator inside a reality simulator is kinda hard and has taken awhile to get to. should produce a very teachable moment though if it really works.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

Re: super-science breakthrough compendium thread

Postby Ben D » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:15 am

justdrew » Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:58 pm wrote:
Ben D » 08 Aug 2014 22:53 wrote:
justdrew » Sat Aug 09, 2014 4:37 pm wrote:and of course, if a maker of the brain needed to interact with the brain, it would likely chose to present some sort of sensory presence to the brain. Much like a forum avatar. And so I give you... the Avatar Theory of why there's so many different ufos and aliens. The occasional Maker logging in to see what's up with one or more Brains and possibly sort it out, or maintenance bots, etc...

...and to what purpose does the Maker have in mind in creating this system in the first instance?


Perhaps they want us to recommend good videos :thumbsup

or otherwise hold their ennui at bey.

anyway, I say a chip brain like I describe could eventually rival the complexity scope even into Q-bits in the neurons. such a chip brain can very likely really be Alive. I think they will have to be treated as real people, without exception or hesitation. So why make them? Why does anyone make new brains? Yet we do it all the time.

Hmmmmm..."rival the complexity scope even into Q-bits in the neurons"....perhaps....but will it have the same holarchical connectivity with the universal cosmic zero point energy consciousness. If you don't think the cosmos is alive...please just pass by...
There is That which was not born, nor created, nor evolved. If it were not so, there would never be any refuge from being born, or created, or evolving. That is the end of suffering. That is God**.

** or Nirvana, Allah, Brahman, Tao, etc...
User avatar
Ben D
 
Posts: 2005
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 8:10 pm
Location: Australia
Blog: View Blog (3)

Re: super-science breakthrough compendium thread

Postby justdrew » Sat Aug 09, 2014 3:37 am

surely that connects even with the smallest grain of sand :shrug:

but perhaps that cosmic consciousness is just another super brain among peers and makers of it's own. It could be turtles all the way up.
By 1964 there were 1.5 million mobile phone users in the US
User avatar
justdrew
 
Posts: 11966
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: unknown
Blog: View Blog (11)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests