Blogging is not behaviour. Behaviour is truth

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Blogging is not behaviour. Behaviour is truth

Postby fruhmenschen » Wed Aug 21, 2013 12:49 pm

see link and then tell us what you plan to do
http://www.madcowprod.com/


Up in Smoke? 24 Tons of Cocaine in “No Peek Burn Run”
Posted on August 20, 2013 by Daniel Hopsicker



When the government of Costa Rica asked for assistance in disposing of a huge stash of cocaine and other drugs they’d accumulated during the past two years worth of drug trafficking busts—in airports, in airplanes, and on the high seas—the US was only too willing to help.

According to a spokeswoman for the DEA in Miami, it went off without a hitch. At least that's what the DEA says. If anyone actually saw the drugs destroyed, they're not talking.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Blogging is not behaviour. Behaviour is truth

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Wed Aug 21, 2013 1:53 pm

I'm going to keep reading books and cleaning my apartment.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Blogging is not behaviour. Behaviour is truth

Postby fruhmenschen » Thu Aug 22, 2013 10:39 am

Wombaticus Rex » Wed Aug 21, 2013 1:53 pm wrote:I'm going to keep reading books and cleaning my apartment.


I hear the same thing from Mel Epstein in 1934 while he was living in Munich Germany.


two reads

1st read

see link for full story

http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/08/21/60485.htm


Wednesday, August 21, 2013
Cop's Retaliation Suit Revived by Full Circuit
The 9th Circuit on Wednesday resurrected the retaliation claims of a Burbank detective who says fellow officers threatened him with violence and jail time to hide their harsh interrogation techniques.
Angelo Dahlia, a detective in the Burbank Police Department, sued the city of Burbank, Chief of Police Tim Stehr and three officers in 2009 after being placed on administrative leave. The suspension came just four days after Dahlia had told Los Angeles Sheriff's Department investigators about the violent tactics allegedly used on suspects in a 2007 robbery.
Dahlia claims that he saw defendant Lt. Omar Rodriguez grab a suspect by the throat and jam a gun under his eye, saying, "How does it feel to have a gun in your face motherfucker." He says he heard other suspects being beaten behind closed doors by defendant Sgt. Edgar Penaranda, and that defendant Lt. Jon Murphy and Stehr had both approved.
Dahlia alleges that he complained about the beatings to Murphy several times, but was told to "stop his sniveling." The department's internal affairs unit began an investigation in 2008, after which Dahlia says Rodriguez and Penaranda began harassing, threatening and intimidating him to keep quiet. Rodriguez even threatened to have him arrested on a phony case and put in jail, Dahlia claims.
Dahlia says he kept quiet until 2009, when he reported all of his allegations during an interview with an LASD investigator.
He claimed in a federal retaliation lawsuit that he had been suspended for asserting his First Amendment rights, but U.S. District Judge Margaret Morrow dismissed the case for failure to state claim. She found that there was no First Amendment issue because reporting misconduct was part of Dahlia's official duties as a police officer. Morrow also found that the suspension was not an "adverse employment action."
A three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit affirmed in August 2012, citing 2009's Huppert v. the City of Pittsburg. The judges did so reluctantly, however, and four months later the appellate court agreed to reconsider the issue before a full, 11-judge panel. The initial panel also found Stehr immune from the lawsuit, and that ruling stands.
The court convened the en banc panel in part to consider whether Huppert v. City of Pittsburg remained good law. In that case, the majority held that a California detective had acted according to his official duties when he assisted a district attorney and the FBI with a corruption investigation after his chief had told him not to.
Public Citizen, a nonprofit consumer advocacy group, noted that it petitioned for the rehearing.
In a unanimous but hardly harmonious ruling Wednesday, the appeals court revived Dahlia's claims and remanded them to the District Court. The 11-judge panel also jettisoned Huppert v. City of Pittsburg and concluded that courts must make a "'practical' inquiry when determining the scope of a government employee's professional duties" in such retaliation cases.
Public Citizen attorney Scott Michelman credited the decision with helping to ensure transparency when "public officials are engaging in misconduct."
"Courageous police officers like Angelo Dahlia are in many circumstances the public's best or even only available source of information about police corruption and abuse," Michelman said in a statement.
Dahlia was also represented by Michael Morguess with Lackie, Dammeier, McGill & Ethir of Upland, Calif.
The appeals court found that Huppert had used too broad a brush in defining the professional duties of public employees. A proper inquiry must ask, among other things, whether an officer's complaints were directed inside or outside the chain-of-command, according to the ruling.
"We conclude that when a public employee speaks in direct contravention to his supervisor's orders, that speech may often fall outside of the speaker's professional duties," Judge Richard Paez wrote for the court. "Indeed, the fact that an employee is threatened or harassed by his superiors for engaging in a particular type of speech provides strong evidence that the act of speech was not, as a 'practical' matter, within the employee's job duties notwithstanding any suggestions to the contrary in the employee's formal job description."
"Ultimately, Dahlia disclosed the defendants' misconduct, threats, and harassment to LASD when interviewed about the Porto's robbery investigation," Paez added. "In doing so, Dahlia clearly spoke outside the chain of command and, indeed, to an outside agency altogether. Whether Dahlia ultimately acted pursuant to his job duties when he disclosed misconduct to LASD may well turn on whether discovery reveals that Dahlia's supervisors instructed him to meet with and disclose information to LASD or in fact Dahlia did so of his own volition. Construing the complaint in Dahlia's favor, his disclosure to LASD is protected by the First Amendment."
The panel also found that Dahlia's suspension qualified as an "adverse employment action" because it had allegedly prevented him from taking the sergeant's exam, among other things.
While all 11 judges agreed that Dahlia should be allowed to plead his claims further, three of them objected to how the majority got there.
Judge Harry Pregerson came down against the majority's chain-of-command distinction, writing in a concurrence that all of Dahlia's complaints about his fellow officers' alleged actions should be protected under the First Amendment.
"The majority's chain of command guidelines undermine policies that require law enforcement officers to report police abuse up the chain of command," he wrote. "Under the majority opinion's approach, a police officer who complies with his duty and reports unlawful acts to his superiors, and as a consequence is fired for his speech, has no First Amendment protection. In contrast, a police officer who reports unlawful acts to the news media, and as a consequence is fired for his speech, is shielded by the First Amendment. Police officers are trapped in a Catch 22: violate their duty to report up the chain of command or expose themselves to retaliation. A police officer who witnesses police abuse may turn a blind eye to avoid either consequence."
Judge Diarmuid O'Scannlain warned in a separate concurrence that, in overruling Huppert v. City of Pittsburg, the majority had ventured beyond the "sound principles of federalism" and into a realm in which the courts do not belong. Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, who raised a similar issue during oral arguments in March, joined O'Scannlain's concurrence, which reads more like a dissent.
"I respectfully dissent from the majority's analysis because our court makes the same error today by rejecting what California law tells us about the professional duties of that state's police officers," O'Scannlain wrote. "Furthermore, I fear that today's new approach will lead to 'judicial intervention in the conduct of governmental operations to a degree inconsistent with sound principles of federalism and the separation of powers.' Federal courts have no business managing the daily activities of police departments."


2nd read
a species that hires mercenaries to protect them looses the ability to
protect themselves against their bodyguards and are doomed to extinction


see link for full story


Thursday, August 22, 2013
Teen Says Chicago Cops Beat Her Bloody

Chicago police chained a young woman to a wall and beat her bloody in a terrifying interrogation to try to force her to identify a shooter whose face she never saw, the woman claims in court.
Jacklyn Miranda sued Chicago and Unknown Chicago Police Officers in Cook County Court.
"This summer, plaintiff was walking with a friend in the Belmont Cragin neighborhood when she witnessed a shooting of multiple people," Miranda, 18, says in the lawsuit. "From where she was standing - across the street from the shooting - she was unable to see the shooter's face before he fled.
"Plaintiff and her friend immediately ran to help the victims, and reported the shooting to 911 dispatch. When the police arrived, plaintiff and her friend described what they had seen. The police then brought the girls to the police station and took formal statements from them. In giving her statement, plaintiff described everything that she had seen, including a description of the shooter's build. Plaintiff stressed to the police that she did not see the shooter's face, however, and thus could not identify him.
"The shooting was reported on the news to have killed one person and injured multiple others."
Miranda says she graduated from high school this year and is holding down two jobs and planning to go to community college and then university.
After the shooting, she says, "Detective Marco Garcia, along with two unknown defendant detectives, arrived at plaintiff's home. Instead of providing news about the shooting victims, the officers showed plaintiff mug shots, and asked her to sign one of the photos. Plaintiff refused to do so. She had not seen the shooter's face, and did not want to implicate an innocent person.
"The defendant officers accused plaintiff of lying, and of knowing who fired the gunshots. Plaintiff began to cry. Despite this, the defendants continued to pressure plaintiff to sign one of the mug shots. Plaintiff's mother asked the officers to leave, because they were scaring plaintiff, and not to contact her daughter again."
Garcia is not named as an individual defendant.
The complaint continues: "Later, on a day in August 2013, plaintiff was walking to a bus stop in the Belmont Cragin neighborhood when a defendant officer drove by. The defendant reversed his car, got out, and began to search plaintiff. He snatched her purse over her head, and grabbed her phone out of her hand.
"The defendant began to lift plaintiff's shirt to search her, and when plaintiff asked him to stop, the defendant said words to the effect of, 'fine, we'll do this the hard way.' The officer handcuffed plaintiff and put her in his car. When plaintiff asked what was happening, the defendant officer did not tell her.
"Plaintiff asked for her phone back so that she could call her mother, but the defendant refused, telling her that because she was 18 she did not get to call her mom anymore. The defendant belittled plaintiff, accusing her of seeking protection from 'mommy.'"
The officer then refused her request for a lawyer, "telling her that she did not need a lawyer," took her to an interrogation room at the station, where he left her for an hour with her hands cuffed behind her back, Miranda says.
The complaint continues: "When he returned, the defendant handcuffed plaintiff to a ring on the wall. He said words to the effect of, 'we can do this the easy way or we can do this the hard way.' When plaintiff said that she had described everything she had seen of the shooting, he again accused her of lying.
"The defendant indicated that he had been following plaintiff closely, revealing that he knew where she had made an ATM withdrawal days before.
"The defendant made plaintiff look at graphic photos of the shooting victims, including a girl who had been shot in the face. When plaintiff insisted that this would not change what she saw, the defendant, who was much larger than plaintiff, got within inches of her face, screamed at her, and repeatedly called her a 'bitch.' During this, plaintiff was still handcuffed to the wall.
"Plaintiff told the defendant that his pressure could not make her tell a false story. At that, the defendant struck plaintiff across her face with his open hand. Plaintiff began to bleed.
"When the defendant officer opened the door of the interrogation room to leave, plaintiff saw other officers outside. Seeking their help, she called out that she had been hit and was bleeding.
"The defendant came back into the room, closed the door behind him, and threatened plaintiff, saying that if she did that again, he would 'lay her out' and make it look like she had come at him. The defendant proceeded to tighten the handcuffs multiple times around plaintiff's wrist, asking whether plaintiff understood him. He then informed plaintiff that he had done this sort of interrogation before.
"Plaintiff said that since there were cameras in the room, people would know what he was doing to her. The defendant responded with words to the effect of: 'You stupid bitch, the cameras are off in this room. No one cares what happens to you.'
"The defendant again pressured plaintiff to identify the shooter, saying that he would wait all night. When he left, another defendant officer came in. This officer observed plaintiff wiping blood off her face.
"After the original defendant returned, both officers told her to name the shooter, despite her continued assertions that she could not identify him.
"Finally, in an attempt at freedom, plaintiff told the defendants that she would return to the station later and look at a lineup of suspects. After hours of being detained in the interrogation room, the defendants released plaintiff, and drove her to a restaurant where a friend waited. Seeing that the defendants were staying outside the restaurant, watching her from their car, plaintiff fled out of the back door of the restaurant."
Miranda claims that police officers still come to her house asking for her, and have threatened her friends with arrest if they will not disclose where police can find her.
She seeks punitive damages for false arrest, unreasonable seizure, excessive force, failure to intervene, conspiracy, assault and battery, and emotional distress.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Blogging is not behaviour. Behaviour is truth

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:08 am

I call your bluff: you were not alive in 1935.

To quote an activist I know:

fruhmenschen » Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:52 am wrote:Because........................even though you could name all the FBI informants...............
you are incapable of doing anything about it.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Blogging is not behaviour. Behaviour is truth

Postby fruhmenschen » Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:29 am

Wombaticus Rex » Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:08 am wrote:I call your bluff: you were not alive in 1935.

To quote an activist I know:

fruhmenschen » Tue Jul 30, 2013 12:52 am wrote:Because........................even though you could name all the FBI informants...............
you are incapable of doing anything about it.



All you have to do is check the records at Goddard College class of 1938 often referred to as the
Kristallnacht Freshman class. Look for the group photo with entering student Fruhmenschen seated in the front row with the
short stubby mustache.

Do me a favor and contact Aly and ask her to show the documentary A NOBLE LIE made by filmaker Chris Emery
Tell her copies were sent to Robin Lloyd and Roz Payne both Vermont filmakers who are friends of Aly's and live in the Burlington area.
see http://www.anoblelie.com/


2013 festival dates: OCTOBER 11 – 20
BRIEF HISTORY

VTIFF was born from the anti-nuclear movement in the 1985, making it the world’s oldest environmental and human rights film festival. Founded by two longtime peace and social justice activists, George and Sonia Cullinen, the inspiration for the festival came from the success of their 1981 film, From Washington to Moscow, which documented a Walk for Peace between two rural towns — Washington and Moscow, Vermont. The film won the UNESCO prize at the 1983 Hiroshima International Film Festival in Japan and taught the Cullinens that film and video could motivate people to become involved in their own communities and elsewhere in the world. VTIFF grew out of this vision.

The first Vermont International Film Festival was held in 1985 at Marlboro College in southern Vermont. About one hundred people attended the inaugural event. Now based primarily in Burlington, VTIFF has earned a loyal audience for its annual presentation of groundbreaking films spanning the globe, especially films focused on the environment, human rights, and war and peace. Past festival guests have included such activist artists as actor Danny Glover, Bread & Puppet Theater founder Peter Schumann, and historian and playwright Howard Zinn, among others.
2012 VTIFF ARCHIVE
VTIFF Executive Director

Orly Yadin

Orly Yadin, Executive Director of VTIFF since Jan 2012, is a filmmaker and producer of both documentaries and animation films and series. Prior to making films, she was a film researcher on historical programs and since 2001 has been Managing Director of Footage Farm – an archival footage collection. Orly has also taught documentary film history and theory in universities in England and at Burlington College. In 1995 she co-founded and ran Halo Productions specializing in animation films. Many of Halo’s short films won international awards at festivals, and one, Silence, was short-listed for the Academy Awards. A Vermont resident since 2004 and a US citizen since 2010.

Photo: Christopher Green
VTIFF Board of Directors

Deb EllisDeb Ellis, President
Ellis is an award-winning filmmaker and educator and a professor in the Film and Television Studies Program at the University of Vermont. Her film Howard Zinn: You Can’t Be Neutral on a Moving Train, was short-listed in the 2005 Academy Award feature documentary category. Recent work includes a documentary for the Vermont Arts Council 6 Vermont Artists, and a short experimental film Furies. As an independent producer, Ellis works with artists, education and arts organizations, and local non-profit organizations.

Luke BaynesLuke Baynes, Secretary
A native of Pittsfield, Mass., Baynes is a 2003 graduate of the University of Vermont. After a stint in the Pacific Northwest, he returned to Vermont in 2005 and worked as a reporter on the Williston Observer. He is now a freelance reporter. A student of film since the age of 14, he has particular admiration for the films of Howard Hawks and Yasujiro Ozu. As part of his perpetual search for the American Dream, Luke has 47 states on his travel résumé.

Ben Rinehart

Ben Rinehart, Treasurer
A bat biologist in a former life, Ben completed his doctoral work on tent-roosting bats in Ecuador, but has since transitioned to a career in finance. Three years ago, he moved with his family from Cambridge, MA to Burlington to work as an equities analyst for a Vermont-based socially responsible investment firm. Rinehart brings to the board a background in business and finance as well as a passion for (in no particular order) travel, film, skiing, music, food, and vintage guitars.

Anna Blackmer
anna blackmerBlackmer is a poet and teacher; she has worked for many years at Burlington College as a faculty member and chair of arts and humanities. She has volunteered with the Vermont International Film Festival since 1998, and has a special interest in Cuban film and filmmakers. Blackmer oversees the Vermont Filmmakers’ Showcase™ in the festival.

Eric Ford
eric fordFord is currently the Communication Director at Burlington City Arts, where for the past 6 years in addition to his work roles, has regularly programmed contemporary film series. Ford is also the Co-Founder of the Burlington Film Society, which began in 2012. Eric attended the Maine College of Art and graduated with a BA in Communication from the University of Southern Maine. He lives in Westford, VT with his wife and daughter.

Sherrill Musty
sherrill mustyA transplanted Montrealer, Sherrill has lived in Burlington since the late ’60s. She has worked as a free-lance photographer, PR for Champlain Association for Retarded Citizens, Project Director of Humanities Council Grant and producer of audio-visual show, “From Charity to Rights”. Currently, she is a personal trainer and group fitness instructor and serves on the board of Burlington City Arts.

Lorna Peal
Lorna PealLorna Kay Peal’s careers have included serving as a public school educator, an art museum curator, executive director of a community arts and business association, and chairperson of the Fleming Museum’s Advisory Board at the University of Vermont. She currently coordinates a literacy-mentoring program in two local school districts, and consults with small businesses and artists.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Blogging is not behaviour. Behaviour is truth

Postby Wombaticus Rex » Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:47 am

Damn, thank you! Appreciate the roll call of local researchers.

We've also got Gerry Colby, Charlotte Dennett, and HP Albarelli residing in the Green Mountains.
User avatar
Wombaticus Rex
 
Posts: 10896
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:33 pm
Location: Vermontistan
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Blogging is not behaviour. Behaviour is truth

Postby fruhmenschen » Sat Aug 24, 2013 1:21 am

see link for full story
http://www.examiner.com/article/anonymo ... -employees



Anonymous trolls FBI, releases contact data for all Fed employees



August 23, 2013

Anonymous trolls the FBI, releasing the contact details for every employee at the Federal Reserve, after the FBI claimed to have dismantled Anonymous.

Anonymous hacktivists associated with Operation Last Resort (@OpLastResort) released a link via Twitter on Aug 23 alleged to contain the contact information for every employee of the Federal Reserve. The action comes tn response to claims made by the FBI that the leadership of Anonymous had been dismantled.

Contained in the tweet with the link to the data was the following taunt:

How's that, FBI? Game. Set. Match. and LULZ.

In addition to the Federal Reserve release, MinnPost reports Anonymous hacktivists also dumped a large amount of information liberated from what appear to be servers used by the FBI’s Regional Forensics Computer Laboratory (RFCL). A large amount of the information appears to have been scrubbed from computer files as early as January of this year. Such data can only be obtained with direct access to servers.

Last February, Anonymous hacked the U.S. Federal Reserve, and released login credentials and personal information belonging to 4,000 American banking executives as part of the ongoing campaign to reform computer crime law.

Earlier this week, the FBI claimed to have dismantled the leadership of the international hacktivist collective known as Anonymous, apparently unaware that the collective is without leaders. Given the latest development, it seems clear the FBI was premature in declaring victory over Anonymous. For all intents and purposes, Anonymous is alive and well, happy to once again humiliate the FBI, and doing it all for the lulz.

For more news, art and information about Anonymous, check out Anonymous Examiner on Facebook.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Blogging is not behaviour. Behaviour is truth

Postby fruhmenschen » Mon Aug 26, 2013 10:23 pm

see link for full story

http://www.cso.com.au/article/524744/an ... ord_leaks/

Anonymous responds to FBI claims of victory with record leaks


— 26 August, 2013 18:13

After the FBI said their investigations into, and subsequent arrests of, several Anonymous supports led to the dismantling of the loosely associative group and a decline in their activities, Anonymous responds by leaking thousands of compromised records.

Austin Berglas, the assistant special agent in charge of the FBI's cyber division in New York, told Huffington Post last week that the agency dismantled Anonymous' leadership, leading to a drop in action from the multi-faceted collective.

"The movement is still there, and they're still [yakking] on Twitter and posting things, but you don't hear about these guys coming forward with those large breaches. It's just not happening, and that's because of the dismantlement of the largest players...," Berglas said.

As recorded on Twitter, the public voice for many Anons, the initial reaction was laughter. One commenter compared the claim to President George W. Bush's "Mission Accomplished" moment. Another shared his thoughts with an image that resonated with dozens of Anons and supporters - a picture of Tom Cruise laughing.

But for those who watch Anonymous and their interactions with law enforcement, including Gabriella Coleman, an anthropologist whose work focuses on hackers and activism, the FBI's statements came as no surprise.

"The FBI and transgressive hackers have long been locked in a battle of taunts although hackers have a lot more leeway in expressing their true feelings when they want and how they want to. The FBI has been awfully careful and restrained in their statements about LulzSec and Anonymous and it seems like someone finally just broke down and spoke their mind," Coleman explained to CSO, when asked for her thoughts on the incident.

At the same time, she added, it was a big deal to nab many of the LulzSec and a few of the AntiSec hackers. In 2011, especially early on in the summer months, the two groups ran roughshod over the networks of law enforcement, government contractors, and private business. It was only a matter of time before someone was arrested for their actions, or relation to those committing them.

"Nevertheless, despite the mantra that LulzSec was composed of 6 individuals, there were more participants. My sense is that some have receded into the shadows to refuel and do work more discretely. The most recent hack was just a reminder that they are still around and can spring into action if need be," Coleman said.

With the FBI's apparent challenge issued, Anonymous responded by releasing several documents, with thousands of lines of personal information. Adding insult to injury, the collective used a restaurant's compromised website, Texas' The Federal Grill, to host them.

The restaurant was unknowingly mirroring the leaked data for days before someone took action and removed the files. Calls to the restaurant itself confirmed that most of the staff were unaware of the incident.

Still, the fact that the Federal Grill's website was selected to host the documents wasn't an accident. There was lulz, or amusement, to be gained by hosting the stolen data on server with that specific domain name.

"...where better to grill the fedz than at the federal grill (sic)," commented one Anonymous Twitter account, OpLastResort, when asked about the choice to use a compromised domain to host the documents.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Blogging is not behaviour. Behaviour is truth

Postby Jerky » Mon Aug 26, 2013 11:59 pm

Believe someone who spent the better part of a decade being PAID (fairly well) to write a blog... NOBODY knows that blogging is not behaviour better than one who spends any time blogging. As someone who still writes for a living, in many genres and milieus (mostly freelance), probably the gnarliest dragon we face on a daily basis is the near certainty that what we are doing is absolutely inconsequential in the greater scheme of things. I think that goes for the presstitutes and brains-for-hire of the world's various think tanks, too.

YOPJ
User avatar
Jerky
 
Posts: 2240
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 6:28 pm
Location: Toronto, ON
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Blogging is not behaviour. Behaviour is truth

Postby fruhmenschen » Thu Aug 29, 2013 12:03 am

Farsight's Climate Project
A Global Climate Change Remote-Viewing Study
Multiple Realities, Timelines, and Events
2008-2013

http://www.farsight.org/demo/demo2008/R ... Page1.html
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Blogging is not behaviour. Behaviour is truth

Postby fruhmenschen » Sat Aug 31, 2013 1:21 am

see link for full story
http://www.mcall.com/news/breaking/mc-g ... 8787.story

Gilberton Council extends Chief Kessler's suspension
Council wants to meet privately with the YouTubing top cop and his lawyer.


August 30, 2013

GILBERTON, Schuylkill County — Gilberton police Chief Mark Kessler, whose 30-day suspension for firing the borough's guns in profanity-laced YouTube videos was set to expire Saturday, Aug. 31, will remain off duty for now.

At a special Borough Council meeting Friday night, council members voted to extend the suspension indefinitely until Kessler and his lawyer, Joseph Nahas, can meet with them behind closed doors.

Nahas learned Wednesday that he and Kessler were asked to meet with council Friday morning, but the Frackville lawyer said in a letter that he couldn't attend because of a scheduling conflict. Nahas said he and his client would agree to an extended suspension.

Related
Gilberton police chief releases new video as suspension nears an end Gilberton police chief releases new video as suspension nears an end
Assault weapon-wielding supporters rally for suspended Gilberton chief Assault weapon-wielding supporters rally for suspended Gilberton chief
VIDEO: Kessler supporters bring assault weapons to billboard rally VIDEO: Kessler supporters bring assault weapons to billboard rally
Photos Photos
PICTURES: Kessler supporters bring assault weapons to billboard rally PICTURES: Kessler supporters bring assault weapons to billboard rally
Topics
Lawyers
Firearms
Justice System
See more topics »

Neither Nahas nor Kessler was at the Friday evening council meeting, which lasted just a few minutes. Council had called the special meeting for the day before Kessler could return to duty, leading to speculation that he would be fired.
» The latest on traffic, delays and road construction delivered to your mobile phone. Click to sign up to receive text alerts!

Council members have met privately with attorneys Joseph Joyce and Larry Moran, who were hired for legal advice in the case.

Kessler, 41, has slammed council members in YouTube video postings and on his radio show since they suspended him July 31 without pay. His most recent YouTube video shows him shooting a target he calls "Eric," the first name of a councilman who wants him fired.

Councilman Eric Boxer said Friday he doesn't plan to take any legal action against Kessler over the video.

Kessler has repeatedly said he thinks he will lose his job over videos — seen by hundreds of thousands of viewers — in which he fires semiautomatic and automatic weapons during obscene rants in support of gun rights. He has said the town's leaders bowed to political pressure after standing by him in the beginning.

Mayor Mary Lou Hannon said outside the meeting Friday that there are laws that must be followed if council wants to fire a contract employee. She said Kessler has a contract, but nothing in it specifies procedures. The five-year contract expires in 2015.

Gene Stilp, an activist from Dauphin County, was among a half-dozen people who showed up at the meeting. He handed out copies of complaints he filed about Kessler to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; the FBI; the Pennsylvania attorney general's office; and the Schuylkill County district attorney's office.

Kessler has organized a volunteer group called the Constitutional Security Force. According to the group's website, chiefkessler.com, it does not consider itself a militia but will take up arms to protect against tyranny.

In a packet of complaints he handed out at the meeting, Stilp quotes himself saying, "When violence and intimidation hide behind the First and Second Amendments, it must be rooted out."

The advocacy group Keystone Progress has sought Kessler's firing and organized an online petition that has received 23,000 signatures calling for the chief's ouster, which it brought to the meeting where Kessler's suspension was announced.

According to a news release, Keystone Progress didn't plan to attend Friday's meeting because of the "threatening atmosphere created by Kessler and his supporters."

Posts in the last 24 hours on Kessler's Facebook page were calling for violent actions, such as "Fire bomb their offices" and "EXECUTE TYRANTS!"
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Blogging is not behaviour. Behaviour is truth

Postby fruhmenschen » Sun Sep 01, 2013 3:04 pm

November 2, 2007

by CommonDreams.org

Mountaintop Removal and Kitty Genovese
by Robert Shetterly
But for my children, I would have them keep their distance from the
thickening center; corruption Never has been compulsory, when the cities lie at the monster’s feet there
are left the mountains.
—- Robinson Jeffers

The most common form of terrorism in the U.S.A. is that carried on by
bulldozers and chainsaws. It is not enough to understand the natural world;
the point is to defend and preserve it. Sentiment without action is the ruin
of the soul.
—- Edward Abbey

Last week, as I drove north on I-64 in West Virginia from Beckley toward
Cabin Creek, I was stunned at how beautiful the Appalachian Mountains
appeared. The day was cool, gray, and rainy. Maple and oak and tulip trees
were in full color, glowing gold and rust against the dark green of pine and
hemlock. Tattered scarves of translucent clouds lay draped over the
mountains’ shoulders giving the steep heights an alluring look of exotic,
primeval mystery.

I was not in West Virginia, though, to gawk at the beauty strip of mountains
still standing along the interstate to entice tourists. I had come to see
Mountaintop Removal first hand. As I drove, I found myself remembering Kitty
Genovese. In 1964, 28 year old Kitty Genovese was stabbed to death and raped
on a street in Queens. Her murder prompted a national outcry because, as she
screamed for help, no one came to her rescue or even called the police. Why
were Americans so passively uncaring for the plight of their neighbor? As a
young idealistic person, I was nearly as ashamed as if I had failed to act
myself. Of course, I lived in Cincinnati and was somewhat out of earshot.
But I vowed that if ever I were witness to something like that, I would get
involved.

What’s happening in eastern Kentucky and southern West Virginia to our
mountains is rape and murder. If only the mountains had voices to scream,
the world would quake with the sound. The coal companies, like Nazi doctors
preparing a patient for an experiment, shave the mountains first, clear
cutting the oldest and most productive habitats in our hemisphere.
Frequently they dump entire forests into the valleys and bury them under the
blasted rubble of the former mountains. So hungry are they for the coal,
they don’t even have time to eat the lumber hors d’oeurve.

I was headed for Kayford Mountain, the home of Larry Gibson who has refused
to sell out to the coal companies. The mountains for three hundred and sixty
degrees around Kayford have been removed. Once Larry looked up at the
surrounding peaks. Now he looks 1000 feet down. It’s radical, mountain
mastectomy for as far as the eye can see. Mountaintop Removal is the
surgical mining technique that Massey Energy and Arch Coal and other
companies are inflicting on the Appalachians. The tops of the mountains
(euphemistically called “overburden”) are blown off. Then the
“overburden” becomes “valley fill,” mega tons of rubble shoved over
into the valleys, destroying lush habitat and burying over 1000 miles of
streams. Judy Bonds of Coal River Mountain Watch says, “We’re in a war
zone. We’re being bombed. They’re using 3 ½ million pounds of
explosives a day to destroy our mountains.”

People often say that the decimated area looks like the moon. It’s true
that where rounded, tree covered mountains once soared is now ragged, gray
plain. Two million acres blown to bits. An area the size of Delaware. But
nowhere in the moon’s Sea of Tranquility, not yet anyway, would you see a
twenty story machine with an insatiable appetite for coal gnawing at the
stripped ribs of a mountain side. Nor on the moon would you see a cavalcade
of coal trucks, each hauling 120,000 pounds of coal, rumbling through
switchbacks down the flanks of the remaining lower slopes and terrifying the
local drivers. The moon is placid and beautiful except for some garbage and
flags left by the Apollo astronauts. The moon doesn’t have billion-gallon
toxic, coal-slurry ponds precariously contained by earthen dams that can
fail suddenly and bury whole towns under twenty feet of poisonous sludge. (
It’s happened twice.) One is leaking right now above the Marsh Fork
elementary school. The moon isn’t causing incredible rates of asthma and
cancer, isn’t cracking the foundations and walls of poor people’s
houses, poisoning wells, filling their houses and lungs with coal dust, and
forcing them to move. The moon doesn’t have streams full of dead fish. And
the moon doesn’t have devastating floods that wash entire communities away
because all the vegetation and topsoil have been removed. And I don’t
think the moon has 450 of its mountains unaccounted for.
Compared to the destroyed mountains of West Virginia, the moon is a field of
dreams. One might complain that the moon is a little short on culture, but
the coal companies are making sure that southern West Virginia is, too.
It’s much easier for them to do their business if no one’s around. No
witnesses. The people flee for their lives and take the remnants of their
mountain lore, their knowledge of animals and medicinal plants, their
history, and sense of place. Larry Gibson calls it genocide.

So, what does it look like if not the moon? Like the mangled body of a
torture victim. Or, metaphorically, like our Constitution does now to anyone
who once believed in it. The Robinson Jeffers’ quote above comes from his
poem Shine, Perishing Republic. It seems sadly ironic to me that Jeffers
would advise his children that when corruption in the cities overwhelms
them, they can escape to the mountains. Where does one escape to when the
mountains are gone? When the mountains have been ground up for profit? Larry
Gibson says he used to laugh at people taking pictures of the mountains. He
told them, “Why take a picture of a mountain? It’s going to be there
forever.”

Where does Don Blankenship, CEO of Massey Energy, think that he is going to
escape to?

There are crimes and there are crimes. Here in Maine, where I live, we often
are appalled by paper company clear cuts. But, given enough time, poplar
will be succeeded by spruce and pine, and the softwoods in turn by maple,
birch, and oak. It’s even sadly comforting to imagine that if the human
species eradicates itself by its insistence on dominating and destroying
nature rather than living in harmony with it, nature will, after a good
scouring by fire and ice, recover. However, the Appalachian Mountains will
not recover. They will not re-grow. When we think of cannibalism, we think
of a ritualistic or desperate practice that is morally repugnant. But,
imagine a cannibal who eats portions of his own body. It’s hardly even a
question of morality. It’s psychotic. Such is the consumption of the
mountains.

Bill McKibben has said that we no longer live in an environment, we live in
an economy. If the economy is your standard for reality, then it is also
your standard of ethics, just as nature would be if you lived in an
environment. If the economy is your reality, your ethic is profit. If your
reality is nature, your ethic is conservation and sustainability. Which
reality will actually determine whether our species survives?

As Judy Bonds says, Mountaintop Removal is a practice with which we cannot
compromise. It must stop. There is no nicer way to destroy the oldest
mountains in the world, mountains that began their lives three hundred
million years ago when North America and Africa were nudged up against each
other.

Many people in the West Virginian and Kentucky have heard the cry of the
mountains and the displaced people. They are courageously fighting King
Coal. Their lives are threatened frequently. Ever since Massey Energy
bulldozed his family cemetery, Larry Gibson has dedicated his life to saving
the mountains. Judy Bonds, a former Pizza Hut waitress, won the Goldman
Environmental Prize in 2002 for her efforts. Visit the website of Coal River
Mountain Watch (www.crmw.net) and the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition
(www.ohvec.org ) to find out what you can do. This is not just their fight.
The U.S. has plans to build 150 more coal burning plants. Coal is the worst
of the fossil fuels for CO2 emissions. The forests being buried in West
Virginia valleys once absorbed CO2 and mitigated climate change.

Kitty Genovese is now screaming in the West Virginia mountains. She’s screaming for our lives as much as hers. Judy Bonds says, “We’re selling our children’s feet to buy our fancy shoes.”
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Blogging is not behaviour. Behaviour is truth

Postby fruhmenschen » Sun Sep 01, 2013 10:02 pm

see link for full story
9/11 Truth: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects
Review of Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitmate 9/11 Suspects by Kevin Robert Ryan, Microbloom, 2013.
By Rowland Morgan
Global Research, September 01, 2013
http://www.globalresearch.ca/911-truth- ... 1-suspects
911truth

Kevin Ryan is the expert on structural steel who got fired by his firm for speaking out about the tower collapses on 9/11, and he’s still doing so with this courageous book that names so many suspects that you can’t help wondering why he left out George W. Bush. But there’s the catch: 9/11 was a hidden coup by a secret multi-national government that could, as Mr. Ryan worryingly asserts, still be in place today and pulling the strings of Mr. Obama.

Almost everyone in the world now suspects something along the lines of Ryan’s theory that 19 Americans arranged 9/11, and not almost 19 Saudis, except of course North Americans who have had their news and commentary channels ruthlessly controlled for decades. Free discussion of who was really responsible, how they got away with it, and what to do about them has been censored and ridiculed for 12 years.

Thus an “intellectual” employed by Duke University can still conduct a course about 9/11 that begins with the words: “The attacks of September 11, 2001 … demonstrated the ability of non-state actors to inflict serious damage on the world’s greatest superpower and exposed the vulnerability of the entire global community to catastrophic acts of terrorism. “ (Coursera.com) This pundit goes on: “Part II will examine how the United States changed its policies in response to 9/11 in three areas: the use of military force, law enforcement and intelligence activities, and homeland security. We will trace the evolution of these policies from the Bush to the Obama Administration and critically assess the overall counter-terrorism strategy. “ This truly is a case of the blind leading the blind.

In sharp contrast, Ryan’s 19 prime suspects are led by Dick and Don (Cheney & Rumsfeld), sponsors of the Continuity of Government provisions for installing a secret government after a major terror attack. He says they could be motivated by a weird form of patriotism. Dismayed by the USA’s defeat in Vietnam, and shocked by President Ford’s subsequent loss of a second term, they set about transforming themselves into heroes and anointing themselves unacknowledged rulers of the multi-national world. Rigging 9/11 was just duty for them.

Ryan goes on to name 16 other suspects, ranging from Richard Armitage and Frank Carlucci within the secret state to mob-suspect Rudy Giuliani and his sidekick Bernie Kerik, with men like Louis Freeh, George Tenet, Richard Clarke, Paul Bremer, Duane Andrews of SAIC and CIA hitman Porter Goss along the way. He’s done his research thoroughly, and has produced an engrossing read about the ballooning super-state’s ugly underside and its hidden links with the monarchic middle-East. With this horrific lot of fascists at the top, there really is something desperately wrong with the USA, whatever Duke University thinks.

Ryan admits the USA will never bring these men to trial. He hopes that other countries with 9/11 victims will try them. Let’s hope it happens. His case is so self-evident that it is crying out to be heard, except that the one national group that so badly needs to hear it is confused by the litany of cries of “conspiracy theory” or “anti-semitism”. The level of media rigging is mind-boggling, as when the launch of Universal Studios’ bogus United 93 movie directed by the UK’s Paul Greengrass was brought forward to coincide with the trial of Zacharias Moussaoui and received massive free TV news plugs and trailer clips every night for six weeks.

According to Ryan, Bremer toured Ground Zero on the day spouting the official story, the one that got written into Lisa Beamer’s memoir a year later as the Voice of God, first hardback issue: one million copies. Four years and hundreds of waterboard tortures later, the 9/11 Commission’s official version was identical, almost word-for-word, because — guess what? — the torture victims endorsed all the CIA’s accusations and the FBI’s huge PENTTBOM investigation found out nothing and suppressed almost everything.

“The FBI took extraordinary measures to hide evidence…and was remarkably uncooperative with the investigations,” Ryan states. When it seized Flight 93’s ostensible crash site in Pennsylvania, the FBI ensured that absolutely nothing would emerge about it that was not from official sources. With passenger Todd Beamer’s Let’s Roll call issuing from the heart of Pentagon supplier Verizon, the fight-back legend put Americans back on the warpath and the Afghan and Iraq debacles became inevitable. Today’s world-wide electronic surveillance crisis is the direct result of the secret “continuity of government” policy instituted on that day. Governments world-wide cower before the despotic power of trans-national corporations, their legions of bankers, lawyers and private armies, backed by countless servants sworn to secrecy in the super-state.

There are so many ruthless brutes named and described in Ryan’s book that it’s easy to imagine him having a sudden car crash or inexplicable heart-attack. Still, most of them are getting old now, and even their powers must be waning. Perhaps youth will get out of the clutches of Miley Cyrus and Justin Bieber and arrange for a brighter tomorrow, although the chance of a space-9/11 or an armageddon chemical attack seems just as possible. Right now the USA is considering unilateral military action against Syria based on trumped up charges.

Ryan has found out so much about his 19 suspects that their full horror lies exposed, and yet I did not read that Rumsfeld introduced aspartame during one of his corporate tenures, nor that Cheney peppered the face of his partner with shot while duck-hunting: Ryan leaves out the tawdry bits. Nor does he have photographs, or he could have shown an FBI officer standing beside a jet engine that disappeared from Fresh Kills depository, or an entirely different crash site for Flight 93 a few hundred yards away from the fake one. He could have shown a secret service jumbo jet circling low over the White House during the Pentagon explosions, or a mug-shot of Atta looking about 25 years younger than the one that was published. He could have shown uniformed personnel absconding with pieces of aircraft from the Pentagon crash site, or the passport that Kerik produced as having somehow fallen from a crashed airliner. All these controversial pictures have been published, and yet the perpetrators still strut around their comfortable estates unaffected. Perhaps Ryan’s diligent quest for details on their backgrounds and motives will serve where photographs did not.

Rowland Morgan attended Cambridge University, worked for the Vancouver Sun, the Georgia Straight, The Independent on Sunday and The Guardian. He has published 42 books, and was co-author of 9/11 Revealed: the Unanswered Questions in 2005 and author of Flight 93 Revealed in 2006.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Blogging is not behaviour. Behaviour is truth

Postby fruhmenschen » Mon Sep 02, 2013 4:50 pm

fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Blogging is not behaviour. Behaviour is truth

Postby fruhmenschen » Mon Sep 02, 2013 10:08 pm

see link for full story
http://www.twincities.com/stpaul/ci_239 ... ken-tilsen

Ken Tilsen, St. Paul civil rights activist and lawyer, dies at 85
09/02/2013

Ken Tilsen, a prominent St. Paul lawyer who agitated for years on behalf of civil rights activists, peaceful protesters and American Indian causes, died Sunday after a long illness. He was 85.

"He was one of the great ones, a real civil rights leader of the 1960s and 1970s," said his friend, Bill Tilton of St. Paul, who hired Tilsen to defend him when he resisted the Vietnam War draft. "When it came to the rights of the little guy, he was the main one."

Tilsen, a longtime resident of St. Paul's Selby-Dale neighborhood, opened his own law firm in 1966 and practiced until 1993, when he joined the Hamline University School of Law as an adjunct professor.

A child of immigrant parents, Tilsen watched his father build housing for low-income families. His family valued "equality, working hard and using your intelligence," according to his son, David Tilsen. His parents' example led Ken Tilsen to take up controversial issues that many others avoided.

Tilsen contributed to the defense of the 200 or so American Indian Movement followers who took over the town of Wounded Knee on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation in South Dakota to protest the federal government's treatment of American Indians in 1973.

For 25 years, he advocated for Rene Hurtado, a former member of El Salvador's military police who sought political asylum in Minnesota after speaking out against human rights abuses in the Central American nation. He also did extensive work with the Southern Minnesota Landowners' Alliance, a group composed mainly of farmers opposed to the construction of a power line through their properties.

Because of his role as the president of the University of Minnesota's Marxist-Socialist Club from 1948 to 1950, Tilsen was summoned before the House Committee on un-American Activities in 1964. He refused to answer any questions about the group's activities before 1950. This helped cement his reputation as an undaunted defender of his beliefs.

"He wasn't afraid of somebody who disagreed with him," Tilton said. "He was kind and always polite -- but he'd get in front of a lot of federal judges, and when a judge wouldn't do something, he wasn't afraid to issue a writ of mandamus (a request to a higher authority to compel a lower court to do something.)"

Tilsen also represented weapons protesters who claimed they were harassed by the FBI for demonstrating in front of Honeywell sites in the Twin Cities.

"He really believed that lawyers had a choice to do the right thing and not just defend anybody or prosecute anybody," his daughter Judith Tilsen, a Ramsey County district judge, said of the clients her father took on. "He cared deeply about fairness and justice ... it wasn't just his work, it was his
Key Hudson casino opponents sent by the Concerned Citizens of Hudson after their meeting with Gov. Tommy Thompson in July 2000. Ken Tilsen is positioned in the front row, to the far left. (Courtesy photo)
passion.

Tilsen met Rachel Le Sueur, the daughter of prominent feminist and activist Meridel Le Sueur, at a protest against the St. Paul Prom Ballroom's no-blacks policy; the two were married in 1947 and went on to have five children, adopt a sixth and care for many foster children.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests