Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
My own reading led me to the understanding the resonance phenomena as a range rather than a single frequency.
There are several nested layers of harmonics, and the actual frequency is subject to periodic shifts.
slimmouse » Fri Nov 29, 2013 5:29 am wrote:Ive just been informed that this particular area of the brain resonates at the same frequency as Shumann resonance.
Sounds like common sense, or at least something that should be, courtesy of some serious education.
Ben D wrote:So let's for example take the frequency of 7.5 Hz, the corresponding wavelength is about 4,000 Km, and for something to resonate at that frequency, it needs to be about that length, or a wavelength fraction or multiple of it. No way do I see it possible for something the size of the brain or human body to resonate at that frequency.
coffin_dodger » Fri Nov 29, 2013 8:27 pm wrote:Ben D wrote:So let's for example take the frequency of 7.5 Hz, the corresponding wavelength is about 4,000 Km, and for something to resonate at that frequency, it needs to be about that length, or a wavelength fraction or multiple of it. No way do I see it possible for something the size of the brain or human body to resonate at that frequency.
I have a very limited knowledge of this stuff, but is it possible that neural or electrical field pathways within human body could 'add-up' to that wavelength or a fraction of it? Thinking very small can sometimes yield astronomical totals?
slimmouse » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:39 am wrote:Hey, thanks for all the replies. I'll be honest and say I know nothing of any of the deeper science of this, yet nonetheless found it somewhat intriguing, , intuitively speaking at least.
In the excerpt I watched, these people really sound like they knew their stuff, and quoted a couple of studies that allegedly confirm their opinions.
I know, Im lazy.
But I promise, It was just an intuition thing.
Well said..and that's a good point for NASA/Space Agencies to consider in the context of the unfolding space age and terrestrial mankind having to adapt to live long term on space stations/outposts with practically no SR and/or planets with a different SR. I hope they are aware of it as a possible physical, mental, and emotional health and stability factor?DrEvil » Sat Nov 30, 2013 11:21 pm wrote:@Ben: Makes sense. The ambient environment is there, so it wouldn't be surprising if evolution somehow put us "in tune" with it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests