Vaccine - Autism link

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Vaccine - Autism link

Postby Karmamatterz » Mon May 10, 2021 11:52 am

User avatar
Karmamatterz
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vaccine - Autism link

Postby conniption » Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:53 am

'Do Not Trust The Medical Or The National Security Establishment!' With Guest Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

(40 min.) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kJdOtnBUcw

RonPaulLibertyReport
• Aug 14, 2020 •

Nephew of President John F. Kennedy, son of Robert F. Kennedy, and tireless crusader against the tyranny of the mainstream medical establishment, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. joins today's Liberty Report to discuss his startling discoveries about who really killed his father and uncle...and why. Plus, Mr. Kennedy, an environmental lawyer, has been among the most vocal and most successful opponents of the mainstream medical establishment, driven by big Pharma to inoculate and medicate everything that moves. He tells the Liberty Report how he very reluctantly decided to dedicate his career to fighting the mandatory vaccines that have resulted in so many documented injuries to the recipients.

Mr. Kennedy's Children's Health Defense can be found at http://www.childrenshealthdefense.org
He can also be found on Instagram: @robertfkennedyjr

Support the Ron Paul Liberty Report and REAL news and analysis with a tax-deductible contribution to the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity: http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/support


on edit: fixed. thx Harvey.
Last edited by conniption on Mon Aug 30, 2021 7:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vaccine - Autism link

Postby Harvey » Mon Aug 30, 2021 9:51 am

I think you missed the underscore which is part of the address -
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4165
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)

Re: Vaccine - Autism link

Postby conniption » Sat Sep 04, 2021 11:06 pm

Thought this was a good interview:

MOB Talks To Del Bigtree About Vaxx Adverse Events

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJTrysAgfME
(47:47 min.)

The Bernician - 23.6K subscribers
• Jan 30, 2021 •
Del Bigtree is one of the preeminent voices of the Vaccine Risk Awareness Movement. His career as an Emmy winning producer of the CBS talk show, The Doctors, changed profoundly when he produced the documentary, Vaxxed: From Cover-up to Catastrophe, which is credited with igniting a revolution against pharmaceutical tyranny around the world.

Now Del’s internet news show, The HighWire, is the fastest-growing program in the natural health arena with over 75 million views. His non-profit, the Informed Consent Action Network, or ICAN, is leading worldwide investigations into drug and vaccine fraud that have already resulted in multiple winning lawsuits against US Government agencies Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, CDC and FDA.

But Del is probably best known for his powerful speeches that weave shocking truth, searing wit and dynamic passion into an experience that is often described as electrifying.



Link for same video thru Odysee: https://odysee.com/@thebernician:7/mob- ... out-vaxx:0
MOB Interviews Del Bigtree About Vaxx Adverse Events
The Bernician - 609 Followers
January 30th, 2021
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vaccine - Autism link

Postby conniption » Mon Sep 06, 2021 9:04 am

AIER
(embedded links)

The Totalitarian Roots of Vaccine Mandates
Barry Brownstein
– September 2, 2021
Reading Time: 5 minutes

Over the course of the pandemic, principles of what a free society means are being redefined by collectivists.

Consider this essay, Don’t COVID Vaccine Mandates Actually Promote Freedom? Medical ethicists Kyle Ferguson and Arthur Caplan argue, “Those who oppose cracking down on the unvaccinated are getting it all wrong.” Ferguson and Caplan are sure their opponents have a “flawed view of freedom.” They argue “Passports and mandates are hardly ‘strong-arm tactics.’ These strategies are better seen as liberty inducers. They bring about freedom rather than deplete it.”

They add, “a successful COVID-19 vaccination campaign will liberate us — as individuals and as a collective — from the callous grip of a pandemic that just won’t seem to end.” Orwell’s “Party” proclaimed in 1984 that “Freedom is slavery.” Ferguson and Caplan come close to arguing “Slavery is freedom.”

Ferguson and Caplan assure us that the enlightenment view of “the unbound individual” is outdated. They want to reimagine freedom as communal, starting with “the individual’s participation in a community and the kind of community in which the individual lives.” They develop their argument:

Here, freedom is communal rather than individualistic. And rather than being unbound, individuals in the free community are bound by and to each other. Communal freedom achieves much more than the unbound individual ever could. It creates new possibilities and expands our horizons. Life is enhanced when our community is free because we can participate in communal freedom and the goods it creates.”


They want to take us back to the future with Rousseau as their guide:

“This view of freedom is like that of Rousseau’s: A society is made free by individuals cooperating, by binding themselves to each other and to the rational pursuit of common goals. From this perspective, vaccine mandates and other “strong-arm tactics” induce liberty rather than restrict it.”


Seduced by the Common Good

For some, flowery visions of the common good have always been seductive. In The Road to Serfdom, Friedrich Hayek observes that even well-meaning people will ask, “If it be necessary to achieve important ends,” why shouldn’t the system “be run by decent people for the good of the community as a whole?”

Hayek challenges the axiomatic belief that wise people can tell others what the common good is. He explains why there is no such thing as the common good: “The welfare and happiness of millions cannot be measured on a single scale of less or more. The welfare of the people, like the happiness of a man, depends upon a great many things that can be provided in an infinite variety of combinations.”

Pulitzer Prize-winning historian James Macgregor Burns recounts in his book Fire and Light how Rousseau’s ideas of the general will led to the brutality of his disciple Robespierre. Like Hayek, Burns explains that there can be no agreement about what the common good is. Claiming to rule by the common good inevitably leads to excesses. Robespierre and the other eleven men who made up the Committee of Public Safety ruled France with “unlimited power” and “terror.”

Burns explains what Rousseau did not understand: “Peaceful and democratic conflict [is] crucial to the achievement of freedom.” Instead, Rousseau imagined, like Ferguson and Caplan “a new society filled with good citizens… working selflessly and with identical minds for the common good.”

Rousseau’s ideas are mantras for censors. In Rousseau’s world, there would be no pesky “long debates, dissensions and tumult” impeding implementation of the common good.

Dr. Fauci is sure he is right, and he has had enough of those making different choices than his guidance: “I respect people’s freedom, but when you’re talking about a public health crisis, that we’ve been going through now for well over a year and a half, the time is come, enough is enough.” Let’s not hide Fauci’s plain meaning, I respect people’s freedom to do what I tell them.

The basic human right to decide what goes into your body is now being reversed.

You are to take all the vaccines Dr. Fauci and Pfizer deem necessary. They—not you—will decide the parameters of your freedom, with Ferguson and Caplan cheering them on. Rest easy, like Robespierre, the fallible decisions of Dr. Fauci, politicians, bureaucrats and cronies are for “the common good.”

With freedom redefined, there will be no need to take personal responsibility for your health decisions. Those who don’t go along with official guidance must be dealt with. Ban them from travel, from schools, and from employment. In Ferguson and Caplan’s Rousseauian view, society is merely expunging those that won’t take a knee to whatever is proclaimed the common good.

The Arrogant Jacobin Mindset

Burns explains that leaders operating from the common good mindset have the “absolute conviction” that they are right. Burns explores the French Revolution as he recounts the totalitarian tyranny of the Jacobins: “The Jacobins believed only they understood the general will of the French people, hence they were morally right.”

Burns continues, “Opposition was considered not merely mistaken but evil and traitorous and hence punishable, even lethally. The Jacobins asserted a monopoly on virtue which meant to them a license to kill those who held up other values.”

Today, health Jacobins don’t argue that they should kill the unvaccinated, but some argue that the unvaccinated should be deprived of healthcare.

In his seminal essay, “Individualism: True and False,” Hayek contrasts true individualism and the false individualism of philosophers such as Rousseau.

True individualism “is a product of an acute consciousness of the limitations of the individual mind which induces an attitude of humility toward the impersonal and anonymous social processes by which individuals help to create things greater than they know.” In contrast, false individualism “is the product of an exaggerated belief in the powers of individual reason and of a consequent contempt for anything which has not been consciously designed by it or is not fully intelligible to it.”

When Ferguson and Caplan write, “Freedom is communal rather than individualistic,” they in Hayek’s words express “the silliest of the common misunderstandings.” The adoption of such ideas, Hayek explains, has been “a source of modern socialism.”

The error made by collectivist apologists is “the belief that individualism postulates (or bases its arguments on the assumption of) the existence of isolated or self-contained individuals, instead of starting from men whose whole nature and character is determined by their existence in society.”

This false individualism of Rousseau and others assumes that “everything which man achieves is the direct result of, and therefore subject to, the control of individual reason.”

Masquerading as people who reason the best, Ferguson and Caplan in Hayek’s words “pretend to be able directly to comprehend social wholes like society.”

Hayek’s explanation of “true individualism” is the antidote for such hubris. Hayek’s approach is “antirationalistic” and “regards man not as a highly rational and intelligent but as a very irrational and fallible being, whose individual errors are corrected only in the course of a social process, and which aims at making the best of a very imperfect material.”

We can never make the best of “imperfect material” when those posing as having superior knowledge are allowed to coerce others. Hayek writes, “What individualism teaches us is that society is greater than the individual only in so far as it is free. In so far as it is controlled or directed, it is limited to the powers of the individual minds which control or direct it.” In other words, choose to be directed by the limited power of Dr. Fauci’s mind or choose the virtually unlimited and unpredictable power of a free society.

Let’s put this together. Health collectivists, behaving like Jacobins, are sure there is one best way; they believe they are the arbiter of truth. Cloaking themselves in the holy robes of the augur of the common good, dissent is not to be tolerated. The end to the pandemic requires not that we follow the collectivists but that we are free to consider different perspectives and discover in the course of an uncoerced social process what really works.
_______

Barry Brownstein is professor emeritus of economics and leadership at the University of Baltimore.
He is senior contributor at Intellectual Takeout and the author of The Inner-Work of Leadership.


More articles by Barry Brownstein

https://www.aier.org/article/the-totali ... -mandates/
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vaccine - Autism link

Postby stickdog99 » Fri Dec 31, 2021 9:07 pm

https://unglossed.substack.com/p/truth-bombs-as-a-verb

Crackpot Corner: HIV Origins Spitballing Edition!

Like so many others, I am new to the wonderful world of anti-vaccine thought, having only been thrust on this path when the mad rush to mass-dose the entire world with an experimental toxin that will likely kill millions, and the anecdotal reports of adverse events described by Steve Kirsch in the “How to Save the World” podcast, set off my alarms over the summer.6

But my approach into this realm of thought is deliberately backward and circular. First, I researched enough of the basics of immunology and genetics to set my own intuition for “The Answer” on the page.7 With this done, I began to read what so many others who have questioned the history of vaccines have found.

As recently as three months ago, I imagined that the link between vaccines and autism was, like so much else in medicine, a quagmire of countervailing associations - akin to the million contradictory “links” between food and disease. No; it turns out that injecting metal into the body just literally causes autism, and everyone involved in denying this knows it is true and doesn’t care.8

There are probably many other speculations I hold about vaccines that will be just as easily dispelled in the coming months.

So, as a festive end-of-year time capsule in my ongoing journey, I wanted to jot down my current top two loose theories for the potential role of vaccines in the implausibly sudden existential conflict between humanity and the virus named HIV.

Feel free to demolish these illusions in the comments, now that they have been set to ink. Change is life.

Theory 1: Antibody Dependent Enhancement (Salk Polio Vaccine)

Rolling Stone, if you can believe it, published an article in 1992 which floated the idea that the HIV crisis was the result of polio vaccines used in Africa.9 A mainstream magazine questioning a vaccine? What a crazy world we lived in!

Specifically, the article speculated that Hilary Koprowski transferred HIV from monkeys into humans in a 1950s polio vaccine trial involving one million recipients in the Belgian Congo.

An Atlantic Monthly article appearing 8 years later would go further, implicating the Salk vaccines in the modern cancer epidemic and prompting a (fruitless) Congressional hearing.10 Here the allegation centered on one of the literally countless11 simian viruses - “SV40” - that had been quietly discovered by vaccine developers from the very beginning of the Salk vaccine’s deployment.12 These viruses were derived from the monkey kidney tissue used to culture the polio virus, and were not reliably “inactivated” by the formaldehyde stage. More stringent standards for reducing simian virus contamination, or improving inactivation, were finally applied in 1963, after millions of American children had been exposed.

Theory: Antibodies to HIV induced by polio vaccines primed recipients to experience ADE against antigenically homologous strains (as with secondary Dengue Virus infection). ADE not only led to more extensive infection (HIV is not an aggressive virus by default), but to increased attack rates for secondary transmission, until a critical mass was reached where multiple strains were in sustained circulation at once. By the time the HIV virus was proposed as the cause of AIDS, circulating strains were so prevalent in affected populations that detectable HIV antibody was a good proxy for exposure and vulnerability (assays for antibody with a high enough selectivity would exclude individuals primed by polio vaccination but not recently exposed to HIV).

Theory 2: Niche Abandonment (Enders Measles Vaccine)

The measles virus life cycle involves ingestion by respiratory immune cells (macrophages and dendritic cells), transit to the lymph nodes, and infection of B and T cells. From here, the virus passes back into the respiratory tract. There may also be a long term dormancy pathway in the natural Measles cycle, helping to account for its ability to vanish and reappear in seasonal patterns.13

Before the moronic “Measles Eradication” campaign was launched by the CDC in 1967, measles and humans enjoyed a harmonious co-existence wherever childhood nutrition was adequate, and mortality in the US was near-zero.14 The infiltration of immune cells by the measles virus was a rite of passage experienced by most, or perhaps all, humans ever born.

With the vaccine, measles ceased to be a seasonal visitor to human children. Unvaccinated Americans did not encounter measles until their teens. With more extensive school vaccination mandates (in reply, of course, to the failure of the vaccine to eradicate the virus), these encounters ceased entirely. Eventually we arrived at the current state of affairs, where almost all adults are walking around susceptible to the virus, but outbreaks are artificially suppressed by the continual (needless!) vaccination of children.

Measles is not the only virus to occupy the niche whose very existence is given as the “cause” for AIDS (ah! it’s a super-virus from Africa that infects immune cells! we’re doomed!) but it appears to be the most prominent and ancient - it is thus likely the most well-coevolved to the human immune system. Given that cases of rubella rose immediately after the deployment of the measles vaccine in 196315 - hence the need to quickly include both mumps and rubella in the same vaccine that prevents childhood encounter with measles - it seems that clearing the measles niche leaves a vacuum which must be filled by other viruses.

Theory: HIV is a poorly co-evolved virus exploiting the niche that should be occupied by measles.

Both these theories are intended to account for the ephemeral nature of the association between the virus and AIDS, but not dismiss the association entirely. As with SARS-CoV-2, Fauci was open with his efforts to exacerbate the death toll of AIDS via promotion of toxic treatment protocol, likely killing thousands in plain sight - yet the discovery of the disease still preceded the protocol. The AIDS epidemic may all be a combination of hysterically exaggerated ailment and poisonous cure, or not.

Neither of these theories is meant to displace the “made in a lab” theory; however, I don’t find it convincing that even a lab-made super-virus gifted to freemasons by aliens could cause AIDS, outside of some prior disturbance to the immune system.

Again, I haven’t researched any of these subjects yet, and won’t be surprised if they are easily refuted. But I hope these theories have nonetheless provided the reader enjoyment or intrigue. Perhaps they will inspire others to research the topic of why a virus should suddenly create a totally unknown medical condition out of the blue in the late 20th century, or to form far better theories.

Happy New Year, and thank you for subscribing to Unglossed!
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6302
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vaccine - Autism link

Postby stickdog99 » Fri Dec 31, 2021 9:18 pm

https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/the-p ... -of-autism

The Political Economy of Autism

Autism is an epidemic and a pandemic by any reasonable definition of those words. J.B. Handley in, How to End the Autism Epidemic, produced the best chart showing the growth in autism prevalence in the U.S. over the last 50 years:

Increase in Autism Prevalence in the U.S. 1970 to 2017

Image

Source: Handley (2018).

Darold Treffert at Winnebago State Hospital in Wisconsin was one of the first people to attempt to measure autism in the general population. His study, published in Archives of General Psychiatry in 1970, showed an autism rate of less than 1 in 10,000 children.

Then, sometime around 1987, the autism rate in the United States began to skyrocket. By 2017, the autism rate in the U.S. was 1 in 36 kids (Zablotsky et al., 2017). So the U.S. has experienced a 277-fold increase in autism prevalence in the last 50 years.

In some places and populations the rates are even higher: in Tom’s River, NJ, the state’s largest suburban school district, 1 in 14 eight-year-olds is on the autism spectrum; in Newark, NJ, 1 in 10 Black boys is on the spectrum (forthcoming).

The United States is in the midst of a genocide.

Genetic theories of autism never made much sense because “there is no such thing as a genetic epidemic” — the human genome just does not change that fast. An early twin study by Susan Folstein and Michael Rutter at the Institute of Psychiatry in London in 1977 suggested a strong genetic component to autism. More recent scholarship shows that this was likely overstated; the study only had 21 twin pairs and did not effectively control for environmental factors (twins usually grow up in the same family and are thus likely exposed to the same toxicants).

As the autism rate exploded throughout the U.S., the state of California hired eleven of the best geneticists in the country to examine the role of genes in autism. They concluded that genetics explains at most 38% of autism cases and in two places they explained that this was likely an overestimate (Hallmayer et al., 2011). Whatever is driving the surge in autism prevalence, it is not primarily genetics.

Well perhaps the increase in autism prevalence is just the result of better awareness (and what’s called “diagnostic expansion and substitution”)? That theory of the case does not check out either. The state of California funded two multimillion dollar to examine sharply rising prevalence in the state and whether it was the result of social factors. The first study was led by pediatric epidemiologist Robert S. Byrd at UC Davis who directed a team of investigators at UC Davis and UCLA. The investigators concluded that, “The observed increase in autism cases cannot be explained by a loosening in the criteria used to make the diagnosis” and “children served by the State’s Regional Centers are largely native born and there has been no major migration of children into California that would explain the increase in autism” (Byrd et al., 2002).

The state of California revisited this question in 2009 with a study led by the top environmental epidemiologist in the state — Irva Hertz-Picciotto at the UC Davis Mind Institute. This study concluded that changes in diagnostic criteria, the inclusion of milder cases, and earlier age at diagnosis explain about a quarter to a third of the total increase in autism (Hertz-Picciotto & Delwiche, 2009). In a subsequent interview with Scientific American, Hertz-Picciotto explained that these three factors “don’t get us close” to explaining the sharp rise in autism over that time period and she urged the scientific community to take a closer look at environmental factors (Cone, 2009).

There are now seven good ‘societal cost of autism’ studies (Jarbrink and Knapp, 2001; Ganz, 2007; Knapp et al., 2009; Buescher et al., 2014; Leigh & Du, 2015; Cakir et al., 2020; Blaxill, Rogers, & Nevison, 2021). They all show that the U.S. and much of the developed world is heading for economic and social collapse as a result of surging autism costs.

Autism increases poverty and inequality. Lifetime care costs for autism range from $1.4 to $2.4 million. Mothers of kids with autism earn 35% less than mothers of kids with other health limitations and 56% less than mothers of kids with no health limitations (Buescher et al., 2014).

In 2015, autism cost the U.S. an estimated $268 billion a year in direct costs & lost productivity; given current rates of increase, autism costs will reach $1 trillion a year (3.6% of GDP) by 2025 (Leigh & Du, 2015). As a point of comparison, the U.S. Defense Department budget is “just” 3.1% of GDP.

All of the more recent studies show autism costs surpassing $1 trillion a year in the near future. There is no plan by any level of government to raise revenue to meet these costs or prevent autism to mitigate these costs. Elected officials are frozen like a deer in the headlights.

In the last decade, three groups of top epidemiologists have published consensus statements declaring that neurodevelopmental disabilities including autism are caused by toxicants in the environment (The Collaborative on Health and the Environment, 2008; Mount Sinai Hospital, 2010; Project TENDR, 2016).

This is good news because it means that autism is likely preventable. The bad news is that the leading mainstream toxicologists do not want to lose their jobs so they generally avoid mentioning pharmaceutical products (even though these products appear to have an outsized impact). Parents groups have made up for the cowardice of mainstream toxicology by funding their own research.

We have fairly good data that five classes of toxicants increase autism risk:

Mercury from coal fired power plants and diesel trucks;

Plastics;

Pesticides & herbicides;

EMF/RFR; and

Pharmaceuticals (Tylenol, SSRIs, & vaccines).

Taking each toxicant in turn...

For every 1,000 pounds of environmentally released mercury, there was a 61% increase in the rate of autism (Palmer, 2006). For every 10 miles closer a family lives to a coal fired power plant the autism risk increases by 1.4% (Palmer, 2009).

Plastics: Children with autism had significantly increased levels of 3 endocrine disruptors (two phthalates — MEHP & DEHP, & BPA) in blood samples as compared with healthy controls (Kardas, 2016).

Pesticides & herbicides: Increased use of RoundUp is strongly correlated (r = 0.989) with the rising prevalence of autism (Swanson, 2014). Organophosphates increase autism risk 60 – 100%; chlorpyrifos increase risk 78% – 163%; pyrethroids increase risk 78% (Shelton et al., 2014).

9 studies show an association between acetaminophen (Tylenol) use & adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes (Bauer et al., 2018). Avella-Garcia (2016) & Liew et al. (2016) found that males exposed to Tylenol in utero have significantly elevated risk of autism.

8 studies show a statistically significant association between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) use in pregnant women and subsequent autism in their children (see meta-analysis in Kaplan et al., 2016). Doctors who prescribe SSRIs to pregnant women are committing malpractice.

Unfortunately, in the debate over toxicants that increase autism risk, all roads lead back to vaccines. At least 5 studies show a statistically significant association between vaccines & autism (Gallagher & Goodman, 2008 & 2010; Thomas & Margulis, 2016; Mawson et al., 2017a & 2017b).

Dr. Paul Thomas is the most successful doctor in the world at preventing autism. Data from his practice show:

If zero vaccines, autism rate = 1 in 715;

If alternative vaccine schedule, autism rate = 1 in 440;

If CDC vaccine schedule, autism rate = 1 in 36.

That study had large sample size (3,344 children), access to medical files, and good researchers working on it. But look closely. His alternative vaccine schedule reduces autism risk by more than 1200%. However even an alternative vaccine schedule increases autism risk by 160% versus no vaccines at all.

And all of those other toxicants that I described above that have been shown to increase autism risk? Those are the 1 in the 715 cases when the parent does not vaccinate at all. Autism appears mostly be a story of iatrogenic injury from vaccines.

This is not a surprise. Thousands of parents have been telling us for years that their children regressed into autism following vaccinations. Ethylmercury is a known neurotoxin and is still in 7 different vaccines (Thomas & Margulis, 2016, p. 14).

Aluminum is a known neurotoxin (Grandjean & Landrigan, 2014) and is used in a majority of vaccines. “The dose makes the poison” paradigm has collapsed in recent years and now we know that many toxicants have no safe dose.

In a sane world, all of this would be seen as good news. In a sane world the CDC, EPA, NIH and every major newspaper would rush out to Portland, Oregon to examine whether the data from Dr. Paul’s practice (and other studies) are correct. But we live in an insane world...

To date, the CDC, EPA, NIH, the federal government, and all state governments have ignored Dr. Paul’s work. None of the top 10 major newspapers in the U.S. have reviewed his book, The Vaccine Friendly Plan even though it is a bestseller on Amazon. In fact the Oregon Medical Board was so incensed by Dr. Paul’s success in preventing autism that they pulled his medical license briefly in 2021 (he has since been reinstated).

All of this information is public and available to anyone with an internet connection and a library card. By 1999 it was clear that vaccines that contained mercury were a problem (see Kirby, 2005). By the early 2000s it was clear that the problems with vaccines went well beyond mercury. Government had a choice to make: come clean or double down. And starting with senior scientist Thomas Verstraeten and then William Thompson the CDC decided to just flat out lie, manipulate findings, and destroy data.

The pharmaceutical industry also had a choice to make: improve their products or utilize their extensive capture of media and government to protect their existing toxic products. As everyone now knows, they chose to protect their existing toxic products. But the pharmaceutical industry has an enormous problem on their hands. We know some vaccines (hepatitis B, HPV, flu, DTaP...) cause catastrophic harms. And pockets of unvaccinated people across the country — who are healthier than vaccinated children — are the control group that provides evidence of Pharma’s crimes.

So starting in 2015, with the introduction of SB277 in California, the pharmaceutical industry began a systematic effort to eliminate the unvaccinated control group in all 50 states. They start by removing religious or personal belief exemptions to vaccination. In subsequent years they introduce bills to eliminate all medical exemptions to vaccination (SB 277 in CA in 2019) to get to 100% vaccination rates (even though all scientists will tell you that there are some children who should not be vaccinated because of underlying health conditions). In the Pharma legislative blitzkrieg no one is spared so that there will be no evidence left of the harms from these products. If 100% of children are treated, then there is no background rate of illness and all vaccine injuries just appear “normal”.

These mandatory vaccine bills are racketeering and crimes against humanity. With the introduction of coronavirus vaccines in late 2020, the situation has gotten much worse. Pharma now aims to vaccinate 100% of adults as well as 100% of kids and the results thus far have been catastrophic.

So here’s where things stand. The vaccine paradigm has collapsed (and no, mRNA, DNA, and adenovirus vector vaccines are not going to save it). Pharma has piles of cash and extensive capture of the media, academia, and government. So they have the ability to do just about whatever they want. Fearing prosecution and seeking immense profits, Pharma has abandoned any pretense of science, consent, or health and pushed all in to set up a totalitarian state that will serve their interests.

But Pharma has harmed so many people — first with the childhood schedule and now with coronavirus vaccines — that there are now millions of people who have seen vaccine injury first-hand and are now fighting back with everything they’ve got. Variously referred to as the medical freedom movement, the health choice movement, and/or the personal sovereignty movement, these brave citizens are taking on the most powerful industry in the world and fighting to save our country from Pharma fascism. The fighting is so fierce because the stakes are enormous. We are fighting to preserve human life as we know it from the most predatory and corrupt industry in the world.

To learn more about the toxicants associated with autism, read The Political Economy of Autism. To learn more about the battle to save our country and the world from Pharma totalitarianism, please subscribe to my Substack.
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6302
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vaccine - Autism link

Postby Iamwhomiam » Sat Jan 01, 2022 12:44 am

Autism appears mostly be a story of iatrogenic injury from vaccines.
It certainly is a story of iatrogenic injury, but is it true?

No one understands what causes Autism. We don't even fully understand how our bodily chemistry works. And we're still a long way from fully understanding the harms caused to humans by bioaccumulative persistent toxic chemicals. These man-made poisonous chemicals do not exist in nature and nature has no method to render them harmless. Some call these "Forever" chemicals. We have hundreds of various man-made chemicals in our bodies, but never we hear this mentioned as possibly causing bad reactions from vaccines.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vaccine - Autism link

Postby Harvey » Sat Jan 01, 2022 1:22 am

Iamwhomiam » Sat Jan 01, 2022 5:44 am wrote:Autism appears mostly be a story of iatrogenic injury from vaccines.
It certainly is a story of iatrogenic injury, but is it true?

No one understands what causes Autism. We don't even fully understand how our bodily chemistry works. And we're still a long way from fully understanding the harms caused to humans by bioaccumulative persistent toxic chemicals. These man-made poisonous chemicals do not exist in nature and nature has no method to render them harmless. Some call these "Forever" chemicals. We have hundreds of various man-made chemicals in our bodies, but never we hear this mentioned as possibly causing bad reactions from vaccines.


But isn't that another way of saying, yes, vaccines cause autism? If you can't remove environmental toxins quickly* and if vaccines have some catalysing effect in conjunction with the environment, then the vaccines are a cause of autism. Using them in this way is a game of Russian roulette for a reward that could be had by simply making vaccines safer, as RFK has been pointing out, rather than ever more profitable.** Two mutually exclusive imperatives.

* Do you know how long it might take? Could it take generations?

* * Like, say, trying to land a planet killing comet, instead of attempting to divert it.
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4165
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)

Re: Vaccine - Autism link

Postby stickdog99 » Sat Jan 01, 2022 6:58 pm

Iamwhomiam » 01 Jan 2022 04:44 wrote:Autism appears mostly be a story of iatrogenic injury from vaccines.
It certainly is a story of iatrogenic injury, but is it true?

No one understands what causes Autism. We don't even fully understand how our bodily chemistry works. And we're still a long way from fully understanding the harms caused to humans by bioaccumulative persistent toxic chemicals. These man-made poisonous chemicals do not exist in nature and nature has no method to render them harmless. Some call these "Forever" chemicals. We have hundreds of various man-made chemicals in our bodies, but never we hear this mentioned as possibly causing bad reactions from vaccines.


I agree that we don't know. But I also think that the reports that "we have ruled out all vaccines as contributors to the explosion of autism and other autoimmune disorders" have been greatly exaggerated.
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6302
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vaccine - Autism link

Postby Belligerent Savant » Sat Jan 08, 2022 12:59 pm

If I say in a roomful of people that antibiotics are valuable drugs but that they have been over-used, or that of course pain-killers have their place but opioids were over-prescribed, or that C-sections have saved many lives but some doctors push them more than necessary, everyone nods and agrees and starts giving examples of a time when some excessive use of those things (or some other drug or intervention) negatively impacted them or someone they knew.

But say that vaccines have their place but have been over used and that they are not as safe as the manufacturers claim? Oh. My. Stars. The entire room will turn on you in a heartbeat, with everyone suddenly turning into pod people and ganging up as one to bleat about how "VACCINES SAVE LIVES!" "THE VACCINE SCHEDULE IS HIGHLY TESTED!" "WHEN DID YOU BECOME AN ANTI-VAXXER?" 'VACCINES DO NOT CAUSE AUTISM, THAT STUDY WAS DISCREDITED!" (even if you never mentioned autism)

It is a truly bizarre phenomenon. If you're not caught up in their "church" and the worship of vaccines, watching it from the outside is just the strangest experience.

...

Vaccines are bedrock dogma for Progressites, mere questioning brings out their terrified fundamentalism.

...

Perhaps it is also hard for people to admit that they may have done something that can harm them and their children.

...



https://ecosophia.dreamwidth.org/165100.html
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5215
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vaccine - Autism link

Postby conniption » Sat Jan 08, 2022 7:29 pm

Childrens Health Defense

The Day Jake Tapper Sold His Soul to Pharma

There’s a reason CNN’s Jake Tapper is intent on branding me a “menace” and “a liar,” and why he refuses to debate me on the merits of facts and scientific evidence. Here’s the back story.

By
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

01/06/22

Apparently, appalled by robust sales of my bestseller, “The Real Anthony Fauci,” CNN anchor Jake Tapper — in lieu of critically reviewing the work — used his Twitter feed to unleash a barrage of ad hominem insults against me.

Breaking with the traditional restraints of journalistic neutrality, professional propriety and intellectual rigor, he branded me “dangerous,” a “menace,” a “liar,” a “grifter,” a fraud, “unhinged” and more.

But Tapper’s defamations hang in the atmosphere without substantiation or citation. If I’m a liar, then what was my lie? If I’m a grifter, then what is my personal profit or advantage? If I am a fraud, then where is my inaccurate statement?

I concede that I’m a dangerous menace, but only to the pharmaceutical industry, its captive technocrats and its media toadies.

When I responded to his slander with a respectful tweet inviting him to debate me, Tapper declined, explaining he would not debate a “conspiracy theorist.” Characteristically, he neglected to cite any conspiracy theory he believes I promoted.

And is it credible to dismiss me as a conspiracy theorist unworthy of debate? After all, I am founder and former president of the world’s largest water protection group, and founder and current chairman of one of the largest children’s health advocacy groups.

I’ve won hundreds of successful lawsuits, including milestone victories against Monsanto, DuPont, Exxon, Smithfield Foods and leading polluters from the chemical, carbon, pharmaceutical and agricultural industries. (Many of these also initially dismissed me as a “conspiracy theorist.”)

My current book, “The Real Anthony Fauci,” may be the most heavily footnoted volume to ever sit atop global best-seller lists for six consecutive weeks. With 500,000 copies sold, it has attracted a whopping 5,500+ five-star reviews (92%).

Despite extreme hostility toward this volume from mainstream media and the medical cartel, no one has yet identified a factual inaccuracy in its 250,000 words.

If my book is baseless conspiracy theories, then shouldn’t Mr. Tapper welcome an opportunity to correct me with facts or arguments that go beyond name-calling?

Allow me, then, to offer my own theory for Mr. Tapper’s apoplexy.

Many people make Faustian bargains during their lives, trading personal integrity for material advantage. Oftentimes the metamorphosis occurs as a gradual erosion of moral fiber. Occasionally it happens in an instant; a man stands at a moral crossroads and chooses the dark side.

I happened to have a front-row seat when Jake Tapper had his moment of moral crisis. I’m guessing his fierce vitriol toward me is a reaction to his embarrassment that I was witness to the instant when Mr. Tapper chose career over character.

In July 2005, Jake Tapper was ABC’s senior producer when the network ordered him to pull a lengthy exposé on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) secret 2000 Simpsonwood conference.

Here is the background:

In 1999, in response to exploding epidemics of autism and other neurological disorders, CDC decided to study its vast Vaccine Safety Datalink — the medical and vaccination record of millions of Americans, archived by the top HMOs — to learn whether the dramatic escalation of the vaccine schedule, beginning in 1989, was a culprit. CDC’s in-house epidemiologist, Thomas Verstraeten, led the effort.

Verstraeten’s initial data run suggested that mercury-containing hepatitis B vaccines — administered during the first month of life — were associated with a wide range of neurological injuries, including a dramatic 1,135% rise in autism risks among vaccinated children.

Verstraeten’s findings propelled CDC into DEFCON 1. The agency’s top vaccine officials summoned 52 pharmaceutical industry leaders, the foremost vaccinologists from academia and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), and public health regulators from the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), CDC, World Health Organization (WHO) and European Medicines Agency to a secret two-day meeting at the remote Simpsonwood retreat center in Norcross, Georgia, to strategize about how to hide these awful revelations from the public.

In 2005, I obtained the explosive transcripts of this meeting and was about to publish excerpts in Rolling Stone (Deadly Immunity, July 18, 2005). Those recordings, ironically, portrayed these leading kingpins of the vaccine cartel poised at their own moral brink, and chronicled their collapse into corruption over two sickening days of debate.

Most of these individuals were physicians and regulatory officials who had committed their lives to public health out of idealism and deep concern for children. Verstraeten’s data confronted them with the fact that the cumulative mercury levels in all those new vaccines they had recommended had overdosed a generation of American children with mercury concentrations over a hundred times the exposures the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency considered safe.

In recommending a vast battery of new vaccines for children, public health regulators had somehow neglected to calculate the cumulative mercury and aluminum loads in all the new jabs.

Dr. Peter Patriarca, the then-director of the FDA Office on Vaccine Research and Review, expressed the general feeling of horror when he asked why no one had calculated the cumulative mercury exposure to children as policymakers added this cascade of new vaccines to the childhood schedule: “Conversion of the percentage thimerosal to actual micrograms of mercury involves ninth-grade algebra. What took the FDA so long to do the calculations?”

In the tense days leading up to the Simpsonwood conclave, children’s health champion Dr. Ruth Etzel of the EPA pleaded with her fellow public health leaders to publicly admit they made a terrible mistake by inadvertently poisoning American children, and to repair the damage.

Dr. Etzel urged AAP and the government regulators to handle the crisis with the same honesty and public remorse that Johnson & Johnson had demonstrated on discovering toxic chemicals in its Tylenol formulations:

“We must follow three basic rules: (1) act quickly to inform pediatricians that the products have more mercury than we realized; (2) be open with consumers about why we didn’t catch this earlier; (3) show contrition. If the public loses faith in the Public Health Services recommendations, then the immunization battle will falter. To keep faith, we must be open and honest and move forward quickly to replace these products.”

Confronted with scientific proof of their role in the chronic disease calamity, the cabal did exactly the opposite. The shocking Simpsonwood transcripts show Dr. Patriarca and the other public health panjandrums warning each other of their reputational liabilities, their vulnerability to litigation by plaintiffs’ lawyers and potential damage to the vaccine program.

Dr. Patriarca cautioned that public disclosure of CDC’s explosive findings would make Americans feel that the FDA, CDC and vaccine policymakers had been “asleep at the switch” for decades in allowing Thimerosal to remain in childhood vaccines.

Over two days of intense discussion, these Big Pharma operatives and government technocrats persuaded each other to transform their disastrous error into villainy — by doubling down and hiding their mistake from the public.

Tapper saw an early draft of my Rolling Stone story and proposed that, in exchange for exclusivity, he would do a companion piece for ABC timed to air on the magazine’s publication day.

Tapper spent several weeks working on the story with me and a team of enthusiastic ABC reporters and technicians. During his frequent conversations with me over that period, he was on fire with indignation over the Simpsonwood revelations. He acted like a journalist hoping to win an Emmy.

The day before the piece was to air, an exasperated Tapper called me to say that ABC’s corporate officials ordered him to pull the story. The network’s pharmaceutical advertisers were threatening to cancel their advertising.

“Corporate told us to shut it down,” Tapper fumed. Tapper told me that it was the first time in his career that ABC officials had ordered him to kill a story.

ABC had advertised the Simpsonwood exposé, and its sudden cancellation disappointed an army of vaccine safety advocates and parents of injured children who deluged the network with a maelstrom of angry emails.

In response, ABC changed tack and publicly promised to air the piece. Instead, following a one-week delay, the network duplicitously aired a hastily assembled puff piece promoting vaccines and assuring listeners that mercury-laden vaccines were safe.

The new “bait and switch” segment precisely followed Pharma’s talking points. “I’m putting my faith in the Institute of Medicine,” ABC’s obsequious medical editor, Dr. Tim Johnson, declared in closing. Two pharmaceutical advertisements bracketed the story.

After that piece aired, I called Jake to complain. He neither answered nor returned my calls.

During the 16 intervening years, Pharma has returned Mr. Tapper’s favor by aggressively promoting his career. Pfizer shamelessly sponsors Tapper’s CNN news show, announcing its ownership of the space — and Mr. Tapper’s indentured servitude — before each episode with the loaded phrase: “Brought to you by Pfizer.”

Under the apparent terms of that sponsorship, CNN and Tapper provide Pfizer a platform to market its products and allow the drug company — a serial felon — to dictate content on CNN.

This arrangement has transformed CNN’s The Lead with Jake Tapper into a propaganda vehicle for Pharma and effectively reduced Mr. Tapper to the role of a drug rep — shamelessly promoting fear porn, confusion, and germophobia, and ushering his audience toward high-yield patent pharmaceuticals.

Tapper’s main thrust during the pandemic has been to promote levels of public terror sufficient to indemnify all the official lies against critical thinking.

All that Pharma money naturally requires that Mr. Tapper kowtow to Dr. Fauci, and the CNN host’s slavishness has helped make Tapper’s show the go-to pulpit for the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director.

It’s a safe place for Dr. Fauci to hit all Jake’s reliable softballs out of the park.

“The bootlicking competition at CNN is pretty nauseating,” observed investigative journalist Celia Farber who has chronicled Dr. Fauci’s mismanagement at NIAID for more than 25 years. “It’s ruinous for both democracy and for public health.”

Another journalist has compared Tapper’s mortifying on-air servility toward Dr. Fauci to the adulation of a loyal and obedient canine. “It’s like a dog watching a chess match,” says former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson. “So much intensity and so little understanding.”

Tapper has gone two years without asking Dr. Fauci a single tough question. He has covered up Fauci’s involvement with Wuhan, suppressed news of vaccine injuries, gaslighted the injured, and defended every official orthodoxy on masks, lockdowns, social distancing, vaccines, remdesivir, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.

He has never asked about the public health, mental health, and economic costs of lockdown, about the disproportionate burdens of Dr. Fauci’s policies on minorities, the working class and the global poor.

He has never asked Dr. Fauci to explain why countries and states that refused Dr. Fauci’s prescription have consistently experienced dramatically better health outcomes. For example, why are U.S. death rates 1,000x the death rates of African countries like Nigeria and Indian states that widely use hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin? Mr. Tapper simply never allows contrary views on his show.

He continues to extol COVID vaccines as a miracle technology that individuals can take four times and still both get and spread the illness.

“He never calls Dr. Fauci on his vacillating science-free pronouncements,” said Farber. “Dr. Fauci seems to be able to paralyze the curiosity features of Tapper’s brain.”

Tapper has to ask Dr. Fauci why, under his direction, America suffered the world’s highest body count. With 4.2% of the global population, our nation suffered 15% of COVID deaths.

Instead, he functions as high priest of every official orthodoxy, working to deify Dr. Fauci and anoint all his absurd, vacillating and contradictory pronouncements with papal infallibility. The sure way to earn Tapper’s indignation is to criticize Dr. Fauci.

Here are just a few examples of Mr. Tapper’s brazen deceptions:

On Feb. 2, 2021, Tapper “debunked” claims that baseball great Hank Aaron may have died from a COVID shot. The home run king submitted to a CDC-staged press conference 17 days earlier. Tapper assured his audience that the Fulton County coroner had determined Aaron to have died from “natural causes.”

When the Fulton County coroner subsequently denied ever having seen Aaron’s body, much less performed an autopsy, Tapper refused to correct his story.

In August 2021, Tapper gave Dr. Fauci a platform to spread the rumor that deluded Americans were poisoning themselves with a “horse medicine” called ivermectin.

In an Aug. 29, 2021 interview, Dr. Fauci told Tapper, “There’s no evidence whatsoever that that works, and it could potentially have toxicity… with people who have gone to poison control centers because they’ve taken the drug at a ridiculous dose and wind up getting sick. There’s no clinical evidence that indicates that this works.”

Tapper never corrected Dr. Fauci. He never pointed out that there were by then 70 peer-reviewed studies demonstrating ivermectin’s miraculous efficacy against COVID.

He didn’t dispute Dr. Fauci’s characterization of ivermectin as a horse medicine by noting that the drug had won both a Nobel Prize and WHO’s listing as an “essential medicine” for its miraculous efficacy against human illnesses, and that people have consumed billions of doses with no significant safety signals.

Mr. Tapper never thought to ask Dr. Fauci if he was trying to discourage use of a cheap, effective drug that might compete with his experimental vaccines.

Instead, Tapper abjectly parroted Dr. Fauci’s talking points: “Poison control centers are reporting that their calls are spiking in places like Mississippi and Oklahoma, because some Americans are trying to use an anti-parasite horse drug called ivermectin to treat coronavirus, to prevent contracting coronavirus.”

It mattered not to Tapper that both Mississippi and Oklahoma officials quickly denied that anyone in their state had been hospitalized for ivermectin poisoning. Tapper never corrected his false story.

On Sept. 14, 2021, Tapper obligingly gave Dr. Fauci a platform to dispute rapper Nicki Minaj’s worry that COVID vaccines may affect fertility. Dr. Fauci simply declared, “The answer to that, Jake, is a resounding no.”

As usual, Tapper did not ask Dr. Fauci to cite a study to support this assertion. He never pointed out to Dr. Fauci that all of the COVID vaccine manufacturers acknowledge that their products are not tested for effects on fertility, or that recent data has shown dramatic upticks in miscarriages and pre-eclampsia in vaccinated women.

Nevertheless, based upon Dr. Fauci’s word alone, CNN rushed on to defame and discredit the rapper and to assure the public that Minaj was wrong. Dr. Fauci, after all, had spoken!

It’s easy to see how two years of such obsequious deference emboldened Dr. Fauci in November 2021 to declare that “I represent science.”

There are too many other examples of Tapper’s uncritical promotion of government and pharma falsehoods to even summarize. These are not harmless lies. Each of them has potentially disastrous consequences for public health.

The term “psychological projection” describes the uncanny precision with which a certain sort of person applies the very pejoratives to others that most accurately depict their own shortcomings.

When Mr. Tapper calls me “unhinged,” a “menace to public health,” a “fraud,” a “liar,” is he falling victim to projection?

The critical functions of journalism in a democracy are to speak truth to power, relentlessly expose official corruption, and to forever maintain a posture of skepticism toward government and corporate power centers.

What Jake Tapper does is the opposite of journalism. Tapper, instead, aligns himself with power, and makes himself a propagandist for official narratives and a servile publicist for powerful elites and government technocrats.

No wonder his fury at those who challenge their narratives.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defe ... ma-rfk-jr/
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vaccine - Autism link

Postby stickdog99 » Thu Mar 10, 2022 7:24 pm

https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/the-p ... al-hygiene

The Pan Doctrine is Nazi Racial Hygiene Theory Version 2.0 with an extra dose of psychosis

I want to follow up on Dr. Aaron Kheriaty’s excellent article on the Doctors’ Trial at Nuremberg following World War II.

What Dr. Kheriaty does so well in this article is to show that a set of bad ideas within the medical profession led to the Holocaust. Under the sway of eugenics, German doctors replaced the Hippocratic Oath with the notion that doctors and the state had a responsibility to serve not the individual but “the ‘health’ of the ‘social organism’ — the volk — as a whole.”

This shift appears subtle at first — it stems from utilitarianism which has been a dominant strand of political theory in the west for centuries. But redirecting a doctor’s responsibility, away from the well-being of the individual to a mythical collective well-being, created a slippery slope that led to the mass murder of people with disabilities, Jews, Gypsies, Roma, Communists, LGBT, and more.

Kheriaty notes that the genocide of the Jews was always described as a public health measure:

Recall that the Jews were routinely demonized by the Nazis as “spreaders of disease.”


Indeed the ghettos that were the staging ground for later transportation to concentration camps were set up under the guise of containing the spread of typhus.

Kheriaty draws a parallel to our current situation by pointing out that vaccine mandates are a breach of the Nuremberg Code that requires informed consent. But I think the situation is even worse than he describes and so I want to go one step further with the analysis.

The Pan Doctrine

Shortly after being awarded my Ph.D. in 2019, I joined thousands of California parents in the fight against SB276 — the bill that removed all medical exemptions to vaccination in order for kids to attend school. Please read that sentence again — SB276 bans all MEDICAL exemptions to vaccination — personal belief exemptions had already been removed by SB277 in 2015. So if you want your child to attend public school in California and your child has already had an adverse reaction to a vaccine or lost a sibling to a fatal vaccine reaction — tough luck, you must continue to vaccinate the child anyway. Under the law, doctors who write medical exemptions are stripped of their license. It is the most draconian anti-science law I’ve ever seen.

Because of SB277 and SB276 California is now a fascist state and thousands of families have had to flee as medical refugees so that their kids could go to school without being poisoned.

SB276 was the work of Senator Richard Pan — a former pediatrician, devoid of normal human emotions, who was selected and groomed by the pharmaceutical industry to be their champion in the legislature. As one of the bluest of blue states, California is where Pharma tests the most extreme fascist policies that they can come up with. Richard Pan is a modern day Josef Mengele and he is one of the people responsible for the explosion in chronic illness amongst California children as a result of iatrogenic injury.

During hearings on SB 276 — before the Assembly and Senate Health and Appropriations Committees, Senator Pan, as the bill’s sponsor, stood at the lectern in the front of the room and grinned like a Cheshire Cat as thousands of parents lined up to voice their opposition to the bill. It was horrifying.

Over the course of the campaign, we became very familiar with Pan’s views because at every hearing he was always given the opportunity to explain the purpose of the proposed law and extra time to respond to arguments against it. In the process (and in subsequent interviews), Pan laid out what I call The Pan Doctrine. During the coronavirus pandemic, The Pan Doctrine has become the ideological approach that guides the Democratic Party’s approach to public health nationwide.

The Pan Doctrine has three elements (picture this in his voice, grinning, explaining to you why you are untermenschen).

1. You are always already diseased. There is no such thing as natural immunity. In California you are presumed diseased unless vaccinated. Vaccines are the only way to control disease. Without vaccines we would all be dead.

2. Because you are always already diseased, if you are unvaccinated you are a threat to spread disease to others, just by breathing, just by existing.

3. Those who are unvaccinated are choosing to remain diseased and are therefore a menace to the well-being of society. So the unvaccinated are by definition terrorists (his word, not mine) and the state has an obligation to do whatever it takes to stop this terrorist threat.

Pan has various metaphors that he uses to make his case (surely developed and focus-group tested by a Pharma PR firm). His favorite is, “your right to swing your fist ends at my nose.” What he means by that is — by virtue of you breathing you are trespassing with your disease into his pure body (his nose), and therefore he has the right to do whatever he wants to you in response to your transgression.

As an example of the pathologies that extend from The Pan Doctrine, during the battle over SB276, Maral Farsi, a member of Governor Newsom’s staff, said that parents of vaccine injured children are “oxygen thieves” — by virtue of breathing these parents were stealing oxygen that rightfully belonged to the obedient members of Team Pharma. This staff person was not disciplined nor even reprimanded and remains on Newsom’s staff today.


The Pan Doctrine is Nazi Racial Hygiene Theory Version 2.0. Richard Pan wants to “cleanse” California of individuals viewed as biological threats to society’s “health.” The only way to remain a member in good standing of society is to submit to as many vaccines as deemed “necessary” by the Pharma State. It’s junk science, it’s eugenics, and it’s fascism. But there is an additional weird twist. Pan’s goal is not health. His goal is for everyone in the state to be chronically ill, disabled, and dependent on the state forever. And that’s exactly what’s happening.

California under The Pan Doctrine is a dystopian science fiction novel come to life.

The Pan Doctrine is psychotic and insane but it has an internal logic that keeps it going. The business model of the California Democratic Party goes like this — the Party is funded by donations from Pharma, the medical establishment (doctors and hospitals), and unions (nurses, prison guards, and teachers). In return for campaign contributions, Dems pass whatever bills these groups hand to them. The bills written by Pharma cause chronic illness rates to skyrocket in the state. This creates extra income for Pharma and hospitals and extra jobs for doctors, nurses, prison guards, and teachers. And, in order to survive, vaccine injured families have to vote Democratic, because keeping the Party in power is the only way to keep their access to healthcare. It’s Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy as a governing philosophy.

And now, thanks to the pandemic unleashed by the Fauci/Wuhan Chimera Virus, The Pan Doctrine has become the governing philosophy of the national Democratic Party. That’s what we are up against — a simple set of bad ideas, that serve a certain set of interests, that lead society over a cliff.

Those are my thoughts for now. I’ll have more to say about this, and calls to action that describe what we might do about this, in the coming days.
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6302
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vaccine - Autism link

Postby conniption » Mon Mar 21, 2022 10:41 am

⁣Dissolving Illusions ( History of Vaccination ) - Suzanne Humphries

1 hr lecture here: https://odysee.com/@Truth_will_set_You_ ... n-Before:3

Truth will set You Free !
March 19th, 2022


Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History - Suzanne Humphries MD , Roman Bystrianyk

Dissolving Illusions details facts and figures from long-overlooked medical journals, books, newspapers, and other sources. Using myth-shattering graphs, this book shows that vaccines, antibiotics, and other medical interventions are not responsible for the increase in lifespan and the decline in mortality from infectious diseases. If the medical profession could systematically misinterpret and ignore key historical information, the question must be asked, “What else is ignored and misinterpreted today?”

Link to free book: https://odysee.com/@Truth_will_set_You_ ... -history:9

Image
amazon link
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Vaccine - Autism link

Postby Belligerent Savant » Fri Apr 22, 2022 2:39 pm

Sha T.
MS, Infectious Diseases and Immunology

Do not equate VACCINATION (a concept) with a VACCINE (a physical substance).

Vaccination is an interesting and useful theory. A vaccine, on the other hand, may be good, or it may be harmful and deadly; it depends on its component and the person receiving the vaccine.

Somewhere along the line, vaccines became conflated with the theory of vaccination, elevated to all of its perceived benefits. Always keep the distinction in mind so you can see clearly and not get lost in the pro/anti-vaccine debate.

Chemical injections containing mercury, heavy metals, or synthetic genes have been proven toxic to life. Labeling these injections as "vaccines" doesn't change this fact.

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/sha2020_ ... esktop_web
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5215
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests