How do we shut down the FBI?

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: How do we shut down the FBI?

Postby DrEvil » Sun Oct 26, 2014 6:20 pm

82_28 » Sat Oct 25, 2014 10:33 pm wrote:Include poetry. Include WHY!


Yes, please expound, but skip the poetry
No need for such coquetry

Edit:
God damn it to heck
I completely forgot to cheRRAWJEUIAUHASJGALGJLGX :wallhead:
"I only read American. I want my fantasy pure." - Dave
User avatar
DrEvil
 
Posts: 3981
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How do we shut down the FBI?

Postby fruhmenschen » Tue Oct 28, 2014 1:03 am

MONDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2014
NEWS / MEDIA / TECH Seattle Times Furious With FBI Over Allegations That the Agency Impersonated the Newspaper

see link for full story

http://www.thestranger.com/slog/archive ... -newspaper


Seven years ago, the FBI used a kind of spyware known as a CIPAV to track down and arrest a 15-year-old hacker who was sending bomb threats to a high school near Olympia. Old news for privacy watchdogs. But today, ACLU analyst Christopher Soghoian trawled through an arcane set of the bureau's records and came across something startling: in order to get the suspect's computer infected with the spyware, the documents suggest that the FBI sent a message to him that masqueraded as an e-mail from The Seattle Times.


"Here is the email link in the style of the Seattle Times," wrote one FBI agent, whose name is redacted. "Below is the news article we would like to send containing the CIPAV," wrote another. The e-mail includes a message, headline, link, and subscription information all purporting to represent an Associated Press article carried online by The Seattle Times. According to WIRED editor Kevin Poulsen, the message acted as a phishing attack and was sent to the young man's MySpace account, "luring him to read an article about himself at a custom url."

The HTML behind the link would presumably redirect the viewer to an FBI server, which would infect the computer with spyware (CIPAV stands for Computer & Internet Protocol Address Verifier) allowing the government to track the computer's "IP address, MAC address, list of running programs, operating system, Internet browser used, language used, the registered computer name, the currently logged-in username, and more," according to Ars Technica.

"I remember reading about it at the time and wondering, 'How do they get people to click on their stupid links?'" says Soghoian, the ACLU's Principal Technologist.

The suspect, identified only as Josh in court records because he was a juvenile, was arrested following the apparently successful use of the CIPAV. But, Soghoian says, "The ends don't justify the means. I'm not saying that the FBI shouldn't be investigating people who threaten to bomb schools. But impersonating the media is a really dangerous line to cross."

The editor of The Seattle Times, Kathy Best, says they just learned about this and are seeking answers from the FBI and the US Attorney's Office. "We are outraged that the FBI misappropriated the name of The Seattle Times to secretly install spyware on the computer of a crime suspect," Best says in an e-mailed statement. "Not only does that cross the line, it erases it... We hope that this mistake in judgment by the FBI was a one-time aberration and not a symptom of a deeper lack of respect for the role of a free press in society."

Soghoian likened the FBI's apparent ploy to the CIA's 2011 fake vaccine campaign in Pakistan, which was in reality a front for intelligence gathering. The CIA pledged not to engage in any future deceptive public health campaigns last year.

Frank Montoya, Jr., the Special Agent in Charge of the FBI's Seattle office, said in a statement: “Every effort we made in this investigation had the goal of preventing a tragic event like what happened at Marysville and Seattle Pacific University. We identified a specific subject of an investigation and used a technique that we deemed would be effective in preventing a possible act of violence in a school setting. Use of that type of technique happens in very rare circumstances and only when there is sufficient reason to believe it could be successful in resolving a threat. We were fortunate that information provided by the public gave us the opportunity to step in to a potentially dangerous situation before it was too late.”

And agency spokesperson Ayn Dietrich-Williams declined, for now, to disclose further details about how the fake e-mail was designed, writing: "I’m sure you’ll understand that in order to safeguard the FBI’s ability to effectively detect, disrupt, and dismantle threats to the public, we must be judicious in how we discuss investigative techniques."

Here's the Times' full statement:

We, like you, just learned of this and are seeking answers ourselves from the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s office.
But we are outraged that the FBI misappropriated the name of The Seattle Times to secretly install spyware on the computer of a crime suspect. Not only does that cross the line, it erases it.
Our reputation—and our ability to do our job as a government watchdog—is based on trust. And n
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How do we shut down the FBI?

Postby fruhmenschen » Thu Oct 30, 2014 2:04 am

see link for full story


http://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/ ... /18154865/



EDITORIALS
The Register's Editorial: Mail snooping needs more accountability

October 29 2014
A tray of mail at the United States Postal Service Processing and Distribution Center in San Francisco on Dec. 16, 2013.
As most Americans, know the U.S. Postal Service has exclusive access to that mailbox at the end of their driveways or hanging on the side of their homes. It's off limits to nosy neighbors and to people distributing brochures, fliers or any other type of non-postal communications. There are also federal laws that restrict the ability of the Postal Service to share information about your mail with others.

Given all that, you'd think the identities of the businesses and people with whom you correspond would be closely guarded by the Postal Service.
If only that was true. The New York Times and Politico recently reported that the Postal Service last year approved 49,000 requests from law enforcement agencies and its own Postal Inspection Service to secretly collect the names, return addresses and other information appearing on the outside of letters and packages intended for specific people and companies. Because these sorts of reviews, known as "mail covers," don't involve the opening of mail, no court warrants are required.
As one would expect, the Postal Service has strict rules surrounding the approval of every request for a mail cover. But the agency's own inspector general said these rules are not always enforced.
In fact, one of out of every five requests for mail covers is approved by the Postal Inspection Service without the required written authorization. Thirteen percent of the approved requests are unjustified, with no reasonable grounds for authorization. The inspector general also found more than 900 active mail covers that should have expired but were still ongoing.
In addition to these lapses, the Post Service has also ignored the requirement to conduct annual reviews of the inspection unit. By refusing to evaluate the unit's work, the Postal Service has avoided the embarrassment of having to acknowledge the problem and taking corrective action.
Is mail surveillance an effective tool in the war on crime? Not so much, actually.
The inspector general says the Postal Inspection Service has repeatedly failed to adequately process requests for mail covers and failed to track the requests that are approved. And there's no data at all that speaks to the number of prosecutions or convictions in which mail covers have played a significant role.
It's not as if the Postal Service doesn't know the surveillance program lends itself to abuse. Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, CIA and FBI agents used mail covers to intercept hundreds of thousands of letters, in some cases, smuggling the mail out of post offices so they could open the letters and read them without postal workers intervening. The abuses came to light only after the FBI investigated a 15-year-old student who sent a letter to the Socialist Workers Party as part of a class assignment.
More recently, an Arizona prosecutor was disbarred after it was shown that he and a county sheriff used mail covers to monitor the communications of a county supervisor who questioned their policies. The county — i.e., the taxpayers — have had to pay the supervisor $1 million in damages.
The inspector general's report gives the Postal Service clear recommendations on how to fix the system, but Congress also needs to take action. The law that allows for mail covers needs to be updated and changed to provide some measure of accountability. As it stands now, mail covers are not subject
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How do we shut down the FBI?

Postby fruhmenschen » Fri Oct 31, 2014 12:59 am

2 reads




1st read

COLUMNISTS
Doctor John suspected as terrorist in San Francisco


see link for full story

http://www.news-press.com/story/opinion ... /18208419/


I take three or four trips a year, using several air lines and a number of airports. The most remarkable discovery I made about security is that every airport has its own rules, even though the TSA provides security nationwide and it should be uniform.

I travel with a cane. (That, with a limp, garners extra consideration and the early boarding privileges extended to slow passengers like me; plus, the cabin attendants smile at me and laugh at my Snoopy shirts.)
When the 3-ounce bottle rule went into effect an agent at one airport got quite upset with me for not knowing about it, although I had just been through two other airports where it was not enforced. Then there was a rule that people over 75 did not need to remove their shoes or jackets, except sometimes. There was no prize for guessing correctly, which didn't seem fair. Removing one's shoes when one cannot stand safely on one foot is a challenge I am pleased to avoid.
Another agent got impatient with me for not informing an undesignated person that I had a knee implant. When I told other agents about the implant they would shrug and make a hand signal for "doesn"t matter." I never seemed to catch up with my responsibilities.
The agents were otherwise polite and helpful, so maybe I was running into the "bad day" effect with the others. The job can get pretty hectic, I'm sure. It can be like the emergency department when a bus full of people going to the Diabetic Support Group picnic has an accident and all of them arrive with a low blood sugar. And everyone is at lunch except me. I used to dream about such things.
Most airports (that I patronize, at least) have gone to the total body scanner, which makes things simpler. You stand in a plastic cylinder, raise your arms and, zip! The cylinder goes around once and the agent says, "Okay, you can go."
I was surprised that the San Francisco airport does not have them. This is a big, international airport handling travelers from all over the Pacific area as well as much of the U.S., so I did not expect to be "patted down" as in past years. The agent put on blue gloves and patted me all over, all the while apologizing, and then rubbed a paper on the gloves. He put the paper on a little machine and it lit up. "EXPLOSIVES DETECTED" flashed in red. I expected everyone to hit the floor to allow gun-toting FBI types to hurdle the benches like O.J. Simpson in those long-ago commercials, but no. Nobody seemed concerned except this particular agent and me. I wondered if I was going to blow up.
He said, "Oh-oh. Wait here." So I waited, naturally, not wanting to attract even more attention. He walked away, talked to a man at a desk and came back. You should be aware that I am 81 years old, carry a cane and wear Snoopy shirts. I probably look harmless, but not so harmless, I hope, that the flight attendants will ignore me.
"OK, you can go," the agent said. No further patting down, no further paper tests, no checking of the machine. Just go. I realized I'd reached the age when I could be profiled, which is not a good age to be.If something blew


2nd story

Nichols says bombing was FBI op | Deseret News
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/.../ ... p.html?p...
Feb 22, 2007 - Potts was no stranger to anti-government confrontations, having been the ... Trentadue said he plans to seek that deposition of Nichols, but "I ...
Attorney: Ashcroft Gagged Nichols From Exposing McVeigh's OKC ...
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/fe ... ichols.htm
Feb 22, 2007 - Trentadue drops new bombshell on Alex Jones Show ... the Deseret Morning News identified the accused FBI provocateur as Larry Potts.
TERRY NICHOLS REVEALS FBI CONNECTIONS TO McVEIGH
http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/02-27- ... gi.65.html
Feb 23, 2007 - Trentadue's death a few months after the April 19, 1995, bombing ... The agent Nichols refers to is none other than the notorious Larry Potts, ...
Confirmed: FBI Got Warning Day Before OKC Bombing Alex Jones ...
http://www.infowars.com/confirmed-fbi-g ... c-bombing/
Feb 8, 2011 - The feds' attempt to make Nichols accept responsibility for the phone call ... “ Trentadue believes the government was desperate to reach the box before ... declaration from Nichols in which he fingered FBI agent Larry Potts as ...
Did Eric Holder Cover Up FBI's Role In '95 OKC Bomb Plot ...
americanfreepress.net/?p=2086
Dec 31, 2011 - An affidavit from Oklahoma City conspirator Nichols about the explosives ... Both were handled by FBI agent Larry Potts, a senior FBI official who had ... and I think they planned to catch them in the act,” stated Jesse Trentadue, ...
Confirmed: FBI Got Warning Day Before OKC Bombing
redicecreations.com/article.php?id=14198
Feb 14, 2011 - The feds' attempt to make Nichols accept responsibility for the phone call ... “ Trentadue believes the government was desperate to reach the box before ... declaration from Nichols in which he fingered FBI agent Larry Potts as ...
Terry Nichols Fast Facts - CNN.com
http://www.cnn.com/2013/03/25/us/terry- ... ast-facts/
Mar 29, 2014 - The FBI accused Nichols of helping build the bomb and arranging a ... Lake City, Nichols accuses Larry Potts, an FBI official, of having taken part in the ... A Utah lawyer, Jesse Trentadue, interviews Nichols in regards to the ...
trentadue - definition and meaning - Wordnik
https://www.wordnik.com/words/trentadue
We now know Timothy McVeigh had a FBI handler prior to the Oklahoma City bombing. google nichols potts trentadue. WHAT REALLY HAPPENED. click here ...
Jack Cashill - Terry Nichols Talks And Much of What He Says Is True
http://www.cashill.com/terrorism/terry_nichols1of2.htm
Feb 26, 2007 - Attorney Jesse Trentadue secured Nichols' signed and sealed declaration as ... As Nichols recounts his conversation with McVeigh, “Potts had ...
Terry Nichols Alleges FBI Played Role In Oklahoma City Bombing ...
intelwire.egoplex.com/2007_02_22_exclusives.html
Feb 22, 2007 - Nichols named gun dealer Roger Moore and Potts as ... Trentadue, a Salt Lake City attorney, has been involved in litigation against the U.S. ...
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How do we shut down the FBI?

Postby fruhmenschen » Sun Nov 02, 2014 12:52 am

http://m.fightbacknews.org/2014/11/1/pa ... ding-trial


Palestinian American leader Rasmea Odeh heading to trial
Commentary by Joe Iosbaker | November 1, 2014

Rasmea Odeh with Steven Salaita at University of Chicago. (FightBack!News/Staff)
Chicago, IL - Rasmea Odeh, the well-known activist in the Palestinian community of Chicago and target of persecution by the U.S. government, goes on trial Nov. 4.

Charged with immigration fraud, the case against her is based on the grounds that, in her application for citizenship ten years ago, she didn’t mention that she was arrested in Palestine 45 years ago. Her arrest was at the hands of the Israeli defense forces, which had illegally seized Palestinian territory. She was raped and tortured by her captors, and forced to sign a confession to stop the abuse. Then an Israeli military court found her guilty without due process and gave her a life sentence. She was released after ten years in a prisoner exchange.

Why does the Department of Justice uphold decisions made by Israel’s military court? The U.S. has a history of condemning military courts in other countries. And when President Obama recently spoke at the U.N., he lectured other world leaders that it was unacceptable today to occupy another nation’s land. Why doesn’t that apply to Israel’s occupation of Palestine?

U.S. backing of Israeli occupation

The U.S. government has always spoken out of both sides of its mouth. U.S. presidents tell the Palestinians they deserve their own state, but refuse to stop Israel’s thousands of illegal settlements in Palestinian areas. The Obama administration warns against countries that defy the ‘international community,’ but has vetoed almost every single United Nations Security Council resolution condemning Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestine.

There’s no denying what is happening: Israel serves the interests of the U.S. elites in the Middle East. The Israeli regime couldn’t exist without the $3 billion a year in military aid it receives from the U.S. It serves the Pentagon as a landlocked aircraft carrier. The aid - and the unjust occupation of Palestine – are the price the U.S. is willing to pay to hold down the Arab and other peoples of the Middle East.

Standing with Israel is a constant refrain from every politician in Washington. For Rasmea Odeh, this means that U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade’s office accepts the stance of the kangaroo court in Israel that convicted her.

Defeat of Judge Borman

The first judge assigned to hear her case was Paul Borman. Borman had many ties to Israel, having helped raise millions to support the apartheid government there. A campaign by the Rasmea Defense Committee called for Borman to recuse himself. At first refusing, he gave in when it was exposed that his family had partial ownership of the grocery store that was the target of the bombing that Rasmea was forced to confess to. This was a huge embarrassment for the federal court, which always denies that decisions are affected one way or the other by politics.

Borman’s recusal was a victory which rallied the spirits of Rasmea and her many supporters. It proved to the movement for justice for Rasmea and for Palestine that if we fight, we can win. It shows us that a great legal defense is required, but so is a group of supporters packing the courtroom each time Rasmea is there.

Judge Gershwin Drain

On Oct. 2, Rasmea appeared before the new judge, Gershwin Drain, where attorneys presented numerous motions. The first decision by Drain was not good. Attorney Michael Deutsch argued that the charges against Rasmea should be dismissed, showing how the case against her began with the illegal investigation of the group of 23 anti-war and international solidarity activists who were subpoenaed to a federal grand jury in 2010. Drain agreed with the prosecution’s counter-argument, that the defense hadn’t proven its case.

Tom Burke of the Committee to Stop FBI Repression (CSFR) commented, “The U.S. government doesn’t want to admit its own crimes. It’s a fact that hundreds of Arabs and Muslims have been targeted by successive administrations only for being Arab or Muslim, or for loving their own people. The raids and subpoenas of the anti-war and international solidarity activists in 2010 were violations of our First Amendment rights.”

Although that decision went against Odeh, Hatem Abudayyeh of the U.S. Palestinian Community Network (USPCN) said, “Rasmea, her lawyers and her supporters sent a message to the court that there is a pattern of the Department of Justice abusing those involved in Palestine support work.”

Latest twist: Attack on our right to fight back

In early October, Prosecutor Jonathan Tukel launched an attack on the Rasmea Defense Committee and Hatem Abudayyeh. Tukel accused Rasmea’s supporters of jury tampering. He alleged that the rallies involving members of the Palestinian community and anti-war activists are “almost certainly criminal.” Tukel is asking for an “anonymous jury” - keeping the names of the jury secret from the public and from Rasmea’s defense attorneys. Tukel used an anonymous jury for the trial of the Underwear Bomber in 2009. The meaning of his motion could not be more clear: Odeh and her supporters are dangerous to the members of the jury.

This would be laughable if the impact wasn’t so terrible. In fact, this is an effort by the prosecution to tamper with the jury. Making jurors and prospective jurors operate in secret makes them think that they are in danger.

There is nothing violent in the efforts of her defense campaign. The only violence that impacts this trial is the inhumane brutality with which the Israeli military treated Odeh in 1969. With each passing day, more people and organizations that support civil liberties are adding their voices to oppose this latest move.

‘I believe that we will win’

This attack by the office of U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade points to one other thing: the movement that supports Rasmea is putting Israel on trial. Especially after the international outcry that responded to the massacres in Gaza this summer, Israel is seen worldwide as the brutal, apartheid regime that it is. Most people hear the ring of truth when they are told that Rasmea was viciously abused at the hands of Israel.

On Oct. 2, in front of the court house in Detroit, Muhammad Sankari of the U.S. Palestinian Community Network led Rasmea’s friends and neighbors in chanting, “I believe we will win.” One of the Palestinian women supporters raised her voice louder and said, “I believe we are winning.” It appears that McQuade and Tukel fear that to be true, and are acting to put an end to the trial in the court of public opinion, and are attempting to rig the outcome of the legal proceeding as well. The rising movement of support for Palestine – the Boycott, Divestment and Sanction (BDS) campaign, the efforts for an arms embargo to stop companies like Boeing that provide the killing tools to Israel, the campus movement to defend critics of Israel like Professor Steven Salaita at the University of Illinois and the massive marches like those in Chicago that mobilized to halt the slaughter in Gaza – is in fact winning.

All out for Detroit

A major mobilization Is underway to pack the courtroom during Odeh’s Nov. 4 trial. “People from around the country will be coming to Detroit to support Rasmea. We will stand with her at her trial and demand Justice,” stated Jess Sundin of the Committee to Stop FBI Repression.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How do we shut down the FBI?

Postby fruhmenschen » Wed Nov 05, 2014 2:49 am

The FBI: America’s Secret Police
by JOHN W. WHITEHEAD

The FBI: America’s Secret Police
http://www.gilmermirror.com/view/full_s ... eft_column


By John W. Whitehead

November 04, 2014

We want no Gestapo or secret police. The FBI is tending in that direction. They are dabbling in sex-life scandals and plain blackmail. J. Edgar Hoover would give his right eye to take over, and all congressmen and senators are afraid of him.—President Harry S. Truman

Secret police. Secret courts. Secret government agencies. Surveillance. Intimidation tactics. Harassment. Torture. Brutality. Widespread corruption. Entrapment schemes.

These are the hallmarks of every authoritarian regime from the Roman Empire to modern-day America, yet it’s the secret police—tasked with silencing dissidents, ensuring compliance, and maintaining a climate of fear—who sound the death knell for freedom in every age.

Every regime has its own name for its secret police: Mussolini’s OVRA carried out phone surveillance on government officials. Stalin’s NKVD carried out large-scale purges, terror and depopulation. Hitler’s Gestapo went door to door ferreting out dissidents and other political “enemies” of the state. And in the U.S., it’s the Federal Bureau of Investigation that does the dirty work of ensuring compliance, keeping tabs on potential dissidents, and punishing those who dare to challenge the status quo.

Whether the FBI is planting undercover agents in churches, synagogues and mosques; issuing fake emergency letters to gain access to Americans’ phone records; using intimidation tactics to silence Americans who are critical of the government, or persuading impressionable individuals to plot acts of terror and then entrapping them, the overall impression of the nation’s secret police force is that of a well-dressed thug, flexing its muscles and doing the boss’ dirty work.

Indeed, a far cry from the glamorized G-men depicted in Hollywood film noirs and spy thrillers, the government’s henchmen have become the embodiment of how power, once acquired, can be so easily corrupted and abused.

Case in point: the FBI is being sued after its agents, lacking sufficient evidence to acquire a search warrant, disabled a hotel’s internet and then impersonated Internet repair technicians in order to gain access to a hotel suite and record the activities of the room’s occupants. Justifying the warrantless search as part of a sting on internet gambling, FBI officials insisted that citizens should not expect the same right to privacy in the common room of a hotel suite as they would at home in their bedroom.

Far from being tough on crime, FBI agents are also among the nation’s most notorious lawbreakers. In fact, in addition to creating certain crimes in order to then “solve” them, the FBI also gives certain informants permission to break the law, “including everything from buying and selling illegal drugs to bribing government officials and plotting robberies,” in exchange for their cooperation on other fronts. USA Today estimates that agents have authorized criminals to engage in as many as 15 crimes a day. Some of these informants are getting paid astronomical sums: one particularly unsavory fellow, later arrested for attempting to run over a police officer, was actually paid $85,000 for his help laying the trap for an entrapment scheme.

In a stunning development reported by The Washington Post, a probe into misconduct by an FBI agent has resulted in the release of at least a dozen convicted drug dealers from prison. Several suspects awaiting trial have also been freed, and more could be released as the unnamed agent’s caseload comes under scrutiny. As the Post reports: “The scope and type of alleged misconduct by the agent have not been revealed, but defense lawyers involved in the cases described the mass freeing of felons as virtually unprecedented—and an indication that convictions could be in jeopardy. Prosecutors are periodically faced with having to drop cases over police misconduct, but it is unusual to free those who have been found guilty.”

In addition to procedural misconduct, trespassing, enabling criminal activity, and damaging private property, the FBI’s laundry list of crimes against the American people includes surveillance, disinformation, blackmail, entrapment, intimidation tactics, and harassment.

For example, the Associated Press recently lodged a complaint with the Dept. of Justice after learning that FBI agents created a fake AP news story and emailed it, along with a clickable link, to a bomb threat suspect in order to implant tracking technology onto his computer and identify his location. Lambasting the agency, AP attorney Karen Kaiser railed, “The FBI may have intended this false story as a trap for only one person. However, the individual could easily have reposted this story to social networks, distributing to thousands of people, under our name, what was essentially a piece of government disinformation.”

Then again, to those familiar with COINTELPRO, an FBI program created to “disrupt, misdirect, discredit, and neutralize” groups and individuals the government considers politically objectionable, it should come as no surprise that the agency has mastered the art of government disinformation.

The FBI has been particularly criticized in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks for targeting vulnerable individuals and not only luring them into fake terror plots but actually equipping them with the organization, money, weapons and motivation to carry out the plots—entrapment—and then jailing them for their so-called terrorist plotting. This is what the FBI characterizes as “forward leaning—preventative—prosecutions.”

Another fallout from 9/11, National Security Letters, one of the many illicit powers authorized by the USA Patriot Act, allows the FBI to secretly demand that banks, phone companies, and other businesses provide them with customer information and not disclose the demands. An internal audit of the agency found that the FBI practice of issuing tens of thousands of NSLs every year for sensitive information such as phone and financial records, often in non-emergency cases, is riddled with widespread violations.

The FBI’s surveillance capabilities, on a par with the National Security Agency, boast a nasty collection of spy tools ranging from Stingray devices that can track the location of cell phones to Triggerfish devices which allow agents to eavesdrop on phone calls. In one case, the FBI actually managed to remotely reprogram a “suspect’s” wireless internet card so that it would send “real-time cell-site location data to Verizon, which forwarded the data to the FBI.”

Now the FBI is seeking to expand its already invasive hacking powers to allow agents to hack into any computer, anywhere in the world. As journalist Brett Wilkins warns:

If the proposed rule change is approved, the FBI would have the power to unleash “network investigative techniques” against computers anywhere in the world, allowing the agency to secretly install malware and spyware on any computer, effectively allowing it to control that computer and all its stored information. The FBI could download all the computer’s digital contents, switch its camera or microphone on or off and even control other computers in its network.

And then there’s James Comey, current director of the FBI, who knows enough to say all the right things about the need to abide by the Constitution, all the while his agency routinely discards it. Comey has this idea that the government’s powers shouldn’t be limited, especially when it comes to carrying out surveillance on American citizens. Responding to reports that Apple and Google are creating smart phones that will be more difficult to hack into, Comey has been lobbying Congress and the White House to force technology companies to keep providing the government with backdoor access to Americans’ cell phones.

It’s not all Comey’s fault, though. This transformation of the FBI into a secret police force can be traced back to the days of J. Edgar Hoover. As author Anthony S. Summers points out, it was Hoover who “built the first federal fingerprint bank, and his Identification Division would eventually offer instant access to the prints of 159 million people. His Crime Laboratory became the most advanced in the world.”

Eighty years after Hoover instituted the FBI’s first fingerprint “database”—catalogued on index cards, no less—the agency’s biometric database has grown to massive proportions, the largest in the world, encompassing everything from fingerprints, palm, face and iris scans to DNA, and is being increasingly shared between federal, state and local law enforcement agencies in an effort to target potential criminals long before they ever commit a crime. This is what’s known as pre-crime.

If it were just about fighting the “bad guys,” that would be one thing. But as countless documents make clear, the FBI has a long track record of abusing its extensive powers in order to blackmail politicians, spy on celebrities and high-ranking government officials, and intimidate dissidents of all stripes. It’s an old tactic, used effectively by former authoritarian regimes.

In fact, as historian Robert Gellately documents, the Nazi police state was repeatedly touted as a model for other nations to follow, so much so that Hoover actually sent one of his right-hand men, Edmund Patrick Coffey, to Berlin in January 1938 at the invitation of Germany’s secret police. As Gellately noted, “[A]fter five years of Hitler’s dictatorship, the Nazi police had won the FBI’s seal of approval.”

Indeed, so impressed was the FBI with the Nazi order that, as the New York Times recently revealed, in the decades after World War II, the FBI, along with other government agencies, aggressively recruited at least a thousand Nazis, including some of Hitler’s highest henchmen, brought them to America, hired them on as spies and informants, and then carried out a massive cover-up campaign to ensure that their true identities and ties to Hitler’s holocaust machine would remain unknown. Moreover, anyone who dared to blow the whistle on the FBI’s illicit Nazi ties found himself spied upon, intimidated, harassed and labeled a threat to national security.

So not only have American taxpayers have been paying to keep ex-Nazis on the government payroll for decades but we’ve been subjected to the very same tactics used by the Third Reich: surveillance, militarized police, overcriminalization, and a government mindset that views itself as operating outside the bounds of the law.

Yet as I point out in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, it’s no coincidence that the similarities between the American police state and past totalitarian regimes such as Nazi Germany grow more pronounced with each passing day. This is how freedom falls, and tyrants come to power.

Suffice it to say that when and if a true history of the FBI is ever written, it will not only track the rise of the American police state but it will also chart the decline of freedom in America: how a nation that once abided by the



Read more: The Gilmer Mirror - The FBI America s Secret Police
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How do we shut down the FBI?

Postby fruhmenschen » Fri Nov 07, 2014 11:26 pm

see link for full story


http://www.nujournal.com/page/content.d ... 1&nav=5032



Secret FBI calls issue in man's suit against US
November 7, 2014




The FBI is resisting turning over thousands of classified phone intercepts to a Florida man who is suing the U.S. government for malicious prosecution in a case in which the Justice Department dropped charges that he provided support to the Pakistani Taliban terror group.

The FBI contends in court documents it would take about two years to declassify and translate up to 40,000 calls — most are in the Pashto and Urdu languages — before they could be provided to Irfan Khan's attorney for the lawsuit.

The attorney, Michael Hanna, wants access to the calls to determine if any contain material that could bolster his legal case by potentially showing the government had compelling evidence that Khan was innocent. A Nov. 25 hearing is set before a Miami federal judge on the issue.

Khan, a 41-year-old naturalized U.S. citizen from Pakistan, claims in his lawsuit that he was unfairly arrested on flimsy evidence in 2011 in an FBI probe into his Muslim imam father's support for the Taliban. The father, Hafiz Khan, was convicted in March 2013 and is serving 25 years in prison. But the Justice Department abruptly dropped all charges before trial against Irfan Khan — after he had already spent 319 days in jail.

Hanna said that compared with Khan's ordeal, the FBI's claims that releasing the calls would be too great a burden fall flat — particularly since the calls could have been declassified and turned over years earlier to Khan's lawyers in the criminal case.

"It was a lot more burdensome for Irfan to spend 300 days in jail than it is for government agents to review calls that were previously made available to Irfan," Hanna said. "It doesn't pass the smell test."

The vast majority of the calls being sought for Khan's lawsuit are still classified because they may reveal FBI sources and surveillance methods, according to the bureau.

"The unauthorized release of these items could cause harm to the national security of the United States," wrote Michael Steinbach, head of the FBI Counterterrorism Division, in one court filing.

In addition, the Justice Department has already provided Khan with 1,130 recordings, 3,500 pages of documents and secret grand jury transcripts from the criminal case, the FBI says.

"The tens of thousands of calls that (Khan) seeks bear no relevance to any of the elements of a malicious prosecution claim, and will not lead to any evidence that does," wrote Assistant U.S. Attorney Carlos Raurell in a recent filing.

The FBI is offering Khan another option: by using toll records, agents were able to isolate between 500 and 700 intercepted phone calls in which Khan was probably a participant. Declassifying and translating those would take about six months, the bureau says.

The Justice Department could still withhold some of the calls even if a judge ordered them released. Under the state secrets privilege, the government can withhold information from a lawsuit such as Khan's "when genuine and significant harm to national defense or foreign relations is at stake" and only in the most limited way possible, according to an agency memo filed in court.

It is not clear if the Justice Department will seek to invoke that privilege.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How do we shut down the FBI?

Postby fruhmenschen » Sun Nov 09, 2014 6:10 pm

see link for full story

http://www.sltrib.com/news/1800717-155/ ... ing-report



Judge to weigh whether FBI in contempt in case of Utah attorney investigating brother’s death




On Monday, a three-day trial is scheduled to begin in U.S. District Court in Salt Lake City on a lawsuit by lawyer Jesse Trentadue that seeks documents and videotapes from the FBI investigation into the Oklahoma City bombing — including one tape that he believes shows suspects exiting a Ryder truck parked in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building and the detonation of explosives in the vehicle. Trentadue believes the records will provide information about the death of his brother in a federal prison cell in Oklahoma City a few months after the April 19, 1995, attack.
On Monday, a three-day trial is scheduled to begin in U.S. District Court in Salt Lake City on a lawsuit by lawyer Jesse Trentadue that seeks documents and videotapes from the FBI investigation into the Oklahoma City bombing — including one tape that he believes shows suspects exiting a Ryder truck parked in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building and the detonation of explosives in the vehicle. Trentadue believes the records will provide information about the death of his brother in a federal prison cell in Oklahoma City a few months after the April 19, 1995, attack. Trentadue was photographed in Salt Lake City, Saturday July 26, 2014. Trent Nelson | The Salt Lake Tribune)
On Monday, a three-day trial is scheduled to begin in U.S. District Court in Salt Lake City on a lawsuit by lawyer Jesse Trentadue that seeks documents and videotapes from the FBI investigation into the Oklahoma City bombing — including one tape that he believes shows suspects exiting a Ryder truck parked in front of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building and the detonation of explosives in the vehicle. Trentadue believes the records will provide information about the death of his brother in a federal prison cell in Oklahoma City a few months after the April 19, 1995, attack. Trentadue was photographed in Salt Lake City, Saturday July 26, 2014. Federal Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms agents and FBI agents survey the damage to the Alfred Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City Wednesday, April 19, 1995. A car bomb blast gouged a nine-story hole in the federal office building. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer) The north side of the Alfred Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City is missing after what federal authorities believe to be a car bomb exploded Wednesday, April 19, 1995. (AP Photo)

Courts » Judge says he is “perplexed” by failure to provide report on allegation of witness tampering.
Facebook Twitter Google+ Pinterest Email Print Share This Article
Saying he is "perplexed" by the FBI’s failure to provide a timely report on a witness tampering allegation, a federal judge has scheduled a hearing for Thursday in Salt Lake City for the bureau to argue why it should not be found in contempt.

At the hearing, U.S. District Judge Clark Waddoups also wants the FBI and Salt Lake City attorney Jesse Trentadue — who is suing the agency over records he requested about the Oklahoma City bombing — to discuss the possibility of having a court-appointed special master oversee compliance with court orders in the case.

The tampering claim came up during a four-day bench trial in July on a lawsuit Trentadue filed in 2008 claiming the FBI had failed to conduct a search reasonably calculated to locate all records in the bureau’s possession that he requested under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The agency has responded that it conducted an "exhaustive" search; Waddoups took the case under consideration and has yet to rule.


On the second day of trial, Trentadue said he had just learned one of his witnesses, John Matthews, was backing out of testifying. According to court documents, Matthews planned to testify that he believed the FBI was monitoring bomber Timothy McVeigh in the run up to the 1995 detonation at the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City — information that Trentadue believes the agency wants to suppress.

Trentadue alleges that Matthews — who he describes as a former undercover operative for the government — was threatened by the FBI with the loss of his disability and other veteran benefits if he took the stand. Department of Justice attorneys, who are representing the FBI, denied any coercion and argued an email Matthews sent to them saying he was not threatened settled the matter.

However, Waddoups disagreed the issue was resolved and scheduled a hearing for Thursday to hear testimony on the allegation. He also ordered the FBI to investigate any communications between the bureau and Matthews and submit a report to the court far enough in advance of the hearing so Trentadue could prepare subpoenas, if necessary.

Waddoups noted the DOJ attorneys had said they planned to file the report on Nov. 3 — 10 days before the scheduled hearing — but had not done so, leaving Trentadue with inadequate time to issue subpoenas. In an order issued Thursday, the judge postponed testimony on whether there has been witness tampering and said the upcoming hearing will be devoted to the contempt and special master issues.

The DOJ attorneys responded that the investigation, which was done by the FBI, took longer than expected but the report has been completed and filed. In a motion filed Friday, they asked Waddoups to cancel Thursday’s hearing, arguing that because the FBI conducted the probe and submitted the report as ordered, "no contempt order is warranted, nor is there any need to appoint a special master."

In addition, they asked Waddoups to find that an evidentiary hearing on the tampering allegation is unnecessary. The information contained in the report "makes clear that no witness tampering occurred and that there is no basis to conduct any further proceedings on this matter," according to the motion.

In an affidavit attached to the motion, retired agent Don Jarrett says Matthews, who he has known since about 1992, called him in early July to say that he did not want to testify. Jarrett says he had not heard of the case and suggested that Matthews contact the FBI’s attorney in the case.

Matthews then contacted the Salt Lake City office four times and talked to Special Agent Adam Quirk, who was the person assigned to handle incoming calls the day of the first call, the motion says. Matthews said he had been asked to testify in a trial involving the Oklahoma City bombing but did not intend to appear unless subpoenaed, Quirk said in an affidavit.

"I was not familiar with any trial matching Mr. Matthews’ description," Quirk said. "I was not sure why Mr. Matthews was contacting the Field Office, but I simply confirmed that, in order for him to be required to testify, he would have to be served with a subpoena."

Quirk said Matthews called three more times saying Trentadue wanted him to testify but that he did not want to.

Three of the four calls and two voice mail messages that Matthews left for Quirk were recorded and they "irrefutably demonstrate that it was Mr. Matthews who initiated contact with the Salt Lake Field Office and that SA Quirk did not threaten or attempt to discourage Mr. Matthews from testifying," the motion says.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How do we shut down the FBI?

Postby MacCruiskeen » Sun Nov 09, 2014 7:03 pm

How do we shut down you? You're like the fucking energizer bunny.
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How do we shut down the FBI?

Postby MacCruiskeen » Sun Nov 09, 2014 7:06 pm

It was really nice of the mods to tolerate you having 16 private data dump threads before showing even the tiniest hint of impatience. That's why this board is now such a hotbed of lively debate.
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How do we shut down the FBI?

Postby MacCruiskeen » Sun Nov 09, 2014 7:21 pm

We can shut down the FBI by one of two methods:

1) by starting 16 threads about the FBI's evilness here at RI;

or

2) by wishing upon a star.

Which method do you think will work best? My money's on option 2. (HTH)
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How do we shut down the FBI?

Postby fruhmenschen » Sun Nov 09, 2014 8:51 pm

My money is on the Cybermen
Daleks maybe.

nah!

Keep trying. I think
you might be onto something.
Now about your insufferable case of thread envy....

Oooops here we go again

In other news attorney Jesse Trentadue
emailed me on Thursday looking for help
in his presentation briefs before Judge Waldrops
Then Ed Tatro just sent me this email
regarding the OKC bombing
If anybody has video described in the email
or other info bolstering Jesse's case let him
know at his law office in Salt Lake City


Thanks, Now I have to look for the Venice flying circus vidio on 911. Some where when recording off my TV VHS tapes I captured the sounds of the audio tape in the Water Resorsce Builiding. "Watch the electricity lines , Then two blasts. Then A year later on ABC news they cut one out. One blast. When McVeigh's lawyer, Steven Jones meet with the Dallas Morning News all of his WP5.1 discs he had was stolen of which some of my finding sent to him were on it. By the way in closing John Doe II had on a Cougar ball cap. Josh didn't.. I wish them well they will need it.
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How do we shut down the FBI?

Postby MacCruiskeen » Mon Nov 10, 2014 8:43 am

Now about your insufferable case of thread envy....


Yes, you have a such a big one, and it's only one of sixteen. I'm positively green with envy. You're a male Medusa.
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How do we shut down the FBI?

Postby fruhmenschen » Tue Nov 11, 2014 1:33 pm

9/11 Truth Teleconference
wtc7 pentagon
Draft minutes for Oct. 29, 2014




November 7, 2014
Craig McKee, Secretary 9/11 Monthly Teleconference Call

**********************

Draft minutes for the Wed., October 29, 2014 regular conference call

Present were:

Ken Freeland, Teleconference facilitator, Houston 9/11 Truth
Craig McKee, Teleconference secretary, Truth and Shadows
Barbara Honegger, Independent 9/11 researcher
James Hufferd, 9/11 Grassroots
Pablo Schanes, 9/11 Crash Test
Frank Tolopko, Berkshire 9/11 Truth
Wayne Coste, AE911Truth
Les Jamieson, AE911Truth
Dave Schlesinger, AE911Truth
Nita Renfrew, New York
Time Michael, 9/11 Truth Outreach
Ron Avery, Global 9/11
Barton Bruce, Boston 9/11 Truth
Nick Guillermo, Activism Truth
Mike Booth, 9/11 activist, Indiana

The minutes of the September 2014 conference call were APPROVED

The amended agenda was APPROVED

Push to have redacted pages released

Les Jamieson gave a summary of efforts to get support for House resolution HR-428, which calls for the declassification of 28 redacted pages from the 900-page Senate Joint Inquiry report on 9/11. For more information on the effort to mobilize support for the resolution, go to 911truthoutreach.org/declassify28. Jamieson said that he would like to keep the Teleconference updated on developments.


Feedback on 9/11 Virtual Walking Tour

Barbara Honegger gave an update about work on the 9/11 Virtual Walking Tour, has been undergoing revisions. She pointed out that the creators of the 9/11 Museum have used the museum exhibits to state things that are provably false. She had asked on September’s Teleconference call for feedback concerning the Tour, and several participants on the October call offered their comments and suggestions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fJmQUv-b2Q

Advancing ballot initiatives, raising money

Nick Guillermo of truthactivism.com presented an ambitious plan to create a clearing house for ballot initiatives and a vehicle for raising money through a Super Pac that would be used to fund the initiatives. The object is to make 9/11 truth and other issues self-sustaining.

This effort would utilize social media, blogs, data research and archiving as part of the plan. For more information, go to activismtruth.org and ballotpedia.org.

4) Global 9/11 conference

Ron Avery presented an idea to have a major 9/11 conference in Austin, Texas. If anyone would like to contact Ron, he email address is taphouse@sbcglobal.net.

5) Crash test update

Pablo Shanes of the 9/11 Crash Test project gave an update on where the project stands as well as offering new details. He also mentioned that the organizers are looking for collaborators. For more information: 911crashtest.org



Call began at 8 p.m. EST and adjourned at 9:30 p.m. EST/5 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. PST

You can hear an audio recording of the teleconference in its entirety here:
http://houston911truth.net/audio/102914.wav Also available are archives of earlier calls.

The next monthly teleconference will take place on Nov. 26 at 8 p.m. EST, 5 p.m. PST. Send agenda items for next call to facilitator
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: How do we shut down the FBI?

Postby fruhmenschen » Thu Nov 13, 2014 4:24 pm

my friend Ed Tatro sent me this email today
google his name with the words
JFK assassination

a good criminal justice consumer would already know this

couple of years ago FBI agents tried to assassinate Dr Cyril Wecht


2 reads

1st



Dear Friends,




JFK assassination scholars among you, as well as history buffs in general, may be interested to know that Dr. Wecht will be appearing on H2 (History Channel 2) at 10 p.m. tomorrow night in an episode of "Brad
Meltzer's Lost History" entitled "JFK's Brain." For more information, including subsequent airing dates, visit http://www.history.com/shows/brad-meltz ... y/episodes



2nd


Wecht investigator's discipline file opened
U.S. judge orders FBI records unsealed
July 11, 2007 11:00 PM

http://www.post-gazette.com/frontpage/2 ... 0707110253


A federal judge yesterday unsealed records revealing that the lead FBI agent in the criminal case against Dr. Cyril H. Wecht was disciplined elsewhere for forging other agents' names and initials on chain-of-custody forms, evidence labels and interview forms.


Related documents
See more information about the disciplinary reports of FBI agent Bradley W. Orsini.


Further, in September 2001 Special Agent Bradley W. Orsini was demoted and received a 30-day suspension without pay for a series of policy violations that occurred from 1993 through 2000, which included having an inappropriate relationship with a subordinate; making improper vulgar and sexual comments; threatening a subordinate with violence; and improperly documenting the seizure of a weapon and ammunition from a search.

"We're pleased this information is now available to the public for its own analysis and understanding of its impact on the case," said Dr. Wecht's defense attorney, Jerry McDevitt. "The report speaks for itself."

The U.S. attorney's office filed Agent Orsini's records under seal on April 7, 2006, asking U.S. District Judge Arthur J. Schwab to determine if it was required to turn them over to Dr. Wecht's defense attorneys.

What followed was a 15-month legal battle that ended this week when the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a final order in the case, making the disciplinary reports public.

Judge Schwab unsealed the records late yesterday afternoon. He also vacated a previous decision in which he'd ordered a contempt hearing for the defense attorneys for their failure to follow his orders.

He wrote "this Court considers the 'time-out' caused by the interlocutory appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit as providing an opportunity for a 'fresh start.'"

He also ordered a hearing in Dr. Wecht's case on Sept. 18 that will allow the defense to use the Orsini reports in their examination of him.

Agent Orsini has been an agent for more than 18 years, and he has spent much of that time, including in Pittsburgh, working public corruption cases. All of the allegations included in the two disciplinary reports occurred while he was working in the FBI's Newark, N.J., office.

U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan would not comment on the reports' release. It was unclear if she was aware of Mr. Orsini's background before he became the lead agent in the case against Dr. Wecht, who is charged with 84 counts of misusing his public office for private gain.

The first time Agent Orsini was disciplined was Nov. 2, 1998. He received a five-day suspension without pay for signing other agents' names to evidence labels and custody forms from May 1995 to January 1997.

He explained that he and another agent, on limited occasions, signed each other's names on evidence "to save time."

Though the investigator from the Office of Professional Responsibility found that Agent Orsini did not intend to jeopardize the evidence or cases involved, his actions could have called the integrity of the bureau into question, he wrote in his report.

A 28-page report issued Sept. 24, 2001, by the assistant director of the Office of Professional Responsibility described additional transgressions.

The first violation listed dated to Nov. 2, 1993. Agent Orsini failed to obtain the proper consent form while searching a man's home for illegal firearms and failed to properly document the ammunition seized.

Agent Orsini was found to have falsified at least six FBI interview forms in 1993 and 1994 by writing other agents' initials on them.

He said in a statement that he didn't believe there would be a problem with that provided the information in the body of the interview form was accurate.

"I have no idea how many times I may have done so," he said. He said he did so for "convenience and a shortcut."

Throughout the Wecht case, defense attorneys have argued that the government based part of the charges against their client -- that he exchanged unclaimed bodies from the county morgue for lab space from Carlow University -- on a single interview form filled out by Agent Orsini.

The disciplinary report next goes into great detail about a relationship Agent Orsini had with a subordinate agent, from April 1998 through early 2000.

The document indicates that other agents in his squad believed Agent Orsini was favoring the woman and gave her premium assignments. It also details gag gifts exchanged at the squad's Christmas parties in 1998 and 1999. One, given to the woman, was a pet collar, with a note that said, "If found, return to Brad Orsini."

"By their very nature, the public notoriety attached to the gag gifts would have put even the most insensitive person on notice of this perception of favoritism," the assistant director wrote.

By January 2000, when supervisors in the Newark office learned of the relationship, Agent Orsini was reassigned.

But before that, he approached one of the agents in his squad and accused him of revealing the relationship. During the meeting, Agent Orsini threatened to hit his subordinate but quickly added that he was kidding.

Newark's assistant agent in charge reported that Agent Orsini "has an aggressive personality, and I would characterize him as a bully."

Other substantiated allegations in the report included that Agent Orsini punched at least one hole in the wall in the Newark office, and threw and broke chairs. He also jokingly called fellow supervisors "homosexuals," and even used a bullhorn to make his comments.

For those actions, the Office of Professional Responsibility said he failed to prevent the development of a "locker room atmosphere" in his squad that repressed professional conduct.

In addition to the suspension and demotion, Agent Orsini was ordered to serve 12 months' probation an
fruhmenschen
 
Posts: 5732
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:46 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests