Fire, hatred and speed!
The glamour, bullying and violence of the libertarian alt-Right has a direct political ancestor, and it’s not Nazi Germany
‘We will glorify … scorn for woman,’ said the Italian Futurists, and the libertarians are only too happy to oblige. Breitbart compares abortion with the Nazi Holocaust and yelps its support for Trump’s relentless hatred of women. Calling breastfeeding ‘disgusting’, Trump once remarked of women: ‘You have to treat ’em like shit.’ So free is he of ethical conventions that he makes sexual comments about dating his own daughter, while libertarian Mary J Ruwart opposed restraints on child pornography. Pandering to the pretence that white men are the ‘victims’ of political correctness – that sneering term for something the rest of us call respect – Yiannopoulos announced plans for college bursaries for white men, to put them ‘on an equal footing with female, queer and ethnic minority classmates’.
Yiannopoulos waxes freely on female biological inferiority in science. ‘Would you rather your child had feminism or cancer?’ is one of his lines. Apropos of ‘Gamergate’ – the controversy over sexism in the video games industry – he referred to ‘sociopathic feminists’. Yiannopoulos did not consider the rape threats that women received over Gamergate to be a serious issue, never mind that the games developer Brianna Wu’s home address was posted online: she received so many death threats that she had to move out of her home. Those victimised by the libertarians have often been silenced: hate speech will do that to a person. Huysmans, in 1884, noted how the supposed ‘free thinkers’ were really ‘people who claimed every liberty that they might stifle the opinions of others’.
Like Italian fascism’s ‘Il Duce’, libertarians support the ‘strong men’ – the rise of the Übermensch in the giddy upsurge of Trump and Vladimir Putin, with Farage nibbling from their fingers and Marine Le Pen in the wings. He’s ‘my daddy’, Yiannopoulos says of Trump, sounding both smirking and sinister. Warner’s airman also finds a surrogate father, a kind of godfather, in the Air Vice-Marshal, and there is something of The Godfather in this, too – a touch of the Mafia, which is becoming so apparent in the Trump camp as he gives his family key jobs around him, treats women as baubles, never forgets a grudge, and speaks a language of violence and revenge.
Return of Kings Advocates Use of Medieval Torture Devices on ‘False Rape Accusers,’ ‘Race Baiters,’ and ‘Male Cucks’
ON MARCH 5, 2017
In a March 2, 2017 post for Return of Kings, John Carver advocated for a return to the use of medieval torture devices — specifically the cucking stool (also known as the ducking stool). Carver writes that, “Dating back to the 13th and 14th centuries, ‘cucking stools’ were specially made chairs used to punish disorderly women and dishonest tradesmen in medieval Britain.” He also wrote that while the last time this punishment was meted out was in 1817, “there are a number of different neer-do-wells in the 21st century west which are rightfully deserving of having the cucking stool reinstated for their transgressions.”
The first group of people on Carver’s torture list is what he calls “false rape accusers” — a category which the writers on Return of Kings would interpret in the broadest way possible, given their rape apologia and utter disdain for women.
Along with a drawing of a woman who was just subjected to the cucking stool and the caption “Have another drink you lying bitch!”, Carver wrote that the “number of women who have falsely accused men of rape or sexual assault has increased substantially in the 21st century, as these women have figured out that a rape accusation will garner them a significant amount of media attention and public sympathy, at the complete expense of her accused man’s life which is being completely ruined because of the ordeal.”
There is no evidence to suggest that the rate of false rape accusations are any higher than false accusations for any other crime, but Carver believes that such women “deserve a very long cucking stool session” where teenage girls and college students “re particularly recommended to attend.”
Another group of people Carver would OK the use of torture on are what he calls “race baiters,” which he defines as “influencial [sic] people who repeatedly make groundless accusations of racism” in order to “negatively influence the actions and attitudes of one particular group of people against another.”
“In the 21st century,” he wrote, “the current mission objective of professional race baiters is to turn everyone who is not a non-Jewish heterosexual white male against non-Jewish heterosexual white males, with particular focus on pitting black men against white men who are employed in law enforcement, politics, or are simply deemed to have too much money, property, or success for their jealous taste.”
Carver also advocated the use of the cucking stool on “modern day cucks.” These “cucks” include men who “have been so brainwashed and browbeaten into believing that feminism is fantastic (hello Justin Trudeau), Donald Trump is ‘literally Hitler’, transgenderism is ‘normal’ and ‘brave’, learning game is akin to ‘rape tactics,’ and that letting military-age Syrian refugees stay at home with your girlfriend all day is supposed to be some sort of civic virtue.” For these people, he said, ” it’s time to dust off the good ol’ cucking stool and get medieval on these sorry excuses for ‘men.'”.Dating back to the 13th and 14th centuries, “cucking stools” were specially made chairs used to punish disorderly women and dishonest tradesmen in medieval Britain.
. . .
The practice did not cause any physical injuries or entail any lengthy incarceration (in accordance with the less-than-capital nature of the accused crimes), but the high level of public humiliation and ridicule often had a profound long term effect on the recipient, which would help to minimize repeat offenses.
The last recorded case of a British woman getting “cucked” by the stool was in 1817, but there are a number of different neer-do-wells [sic] in the 21st century west which are rightfully deserving of having the cucking stool reinstated for their transgressions.
. . .
A false rape accusation is the intentional reporting of a rape when no rape has occurred. The number of women who have falsely accused men of rape or sexual assault has increased substantially in the 21st century, as these women have figured out that a rape accusation will garner them a significant amount of media attention and public sympathy, at the complete expense of her accused man’s life which is being completely ruined because of the ordeal.
. . .
All people who have been caught out for false rape accusations deserve a very long cucking stool session, with a large and spiteful audience present to witness it. Teenage girls and university students are particularly recommended to attend a cucking, to serve as a stern warning and future deterrent.
Race baiters are influencial [sic] people who repeatedly make groundless accusations of racism to the point of acting like a one-note broken record. They have a unique, deliberate, and hypocritical focus on racial issues, and specialize in making malicious use out of news stories to negatively influence the actions and attitudes of one particular group of people against another.
In the 21st century, the current mission objective of professional race baiters is to turn everyone who is not a non-Jewish heterosexual white male against non-Jewish heterosexual white males, with particular focus on pitting black men against white men who are employed in law enforcement, politics, or are simply deemed to have too much money, property, or success for their jealous taste.
Race baiters are like St. Bernard manure on the shoes of society, and a cucking stool session down at the local “spa” (river or lake) should do the trick in wiping the indignant and cunty looking scowls of Al Sharpton, Shaun King, DeRay Mckesson, and Tim Wise off their face.
. . .
Finally, modern day cucks deserve the cucking stool.
How pathetic are men who have been so brainwashed and browbeaten into believing that feminism is fantastic (hello Justin Trudeau), Donald Trump is “literally Hitler”, transgenderism is “normal” and “brave”, learning game is akin to “rape tactics,” and that letting military-age Syrian refugees stay at home with your girlfriend all day is supposed to be some sort of civic virtue?
‘Carl The Cuck‘ and his merry band of SJW’s probably think it does, so it’s time to dust off the good ol’ cucking stool and get medieval on these sorry excuses for “men” along with the preceding five other culprits
Elvis » Sat Mar 18, 2017 2:02 pm wrote:Um, why do you guys know so much about "Roosh"?
(and say, do his techniques actually work?)
Wombaticus Rex wrote:Because a swarthy foreign pickup artist hack being embraced by white nationalists is pretty interesting.
Daily Stormer to white women: All your womb are belong to us!
Future white soldier?
When Internet Nazis rail against the alleged evils of “race-mixing,” the particular kind of mixology that invariably enrages them the most involves white women “mudsharking” or “coal burning” with black men.
It’s no coincidence that the favorite alt-right insult is “cuck,” a term borrowed from cuckold porn, a subgenre that typically involves muscular, well-endowed black men having sex with white “hotwives” while their “cuck” husband watches.
Like the insult “cuck” itself, this kind of porn (by most accounts) is most popular amongst white men, and seems to spring from the not-very-well-hidden fear of many racist white dudes that black men are inherently more virile and masculine than them. For those who don’t share these insecurities, the “cuck” insult stings about as much as being called a doo-doo head.
But when it comes to white men “mixing” with black women, white racists have to more or less force themselves to care.
In a recent post on neo-Nazi tip sheet the Daily Stormer, Andrew Anglin attempts to explain — or at least rationalize — these divergent reactions.
When white women go “mudsharking,” racist white men feela lot of anger, because it’s OUR WOMB – that’s right, it doesn’t belong to her, it belongs to the males in her society – that is being used to produce an enemy soldier.
Turning Point USA Enlists Milo’s Alt-Right Understudy
Ivan has expressed concerns over his personal safety while visiting the Grand Hyatt, apparently convinced of an Antifa plot to physically attack him. Unsurprisingly, he had no such pearl-clutching reaction to violence when he was employing thinly-veiled death threats against the protesters at Milo’s CU Boulder visit. Ivan has no real anxieties about this matter; just like at CU Boulder, he’ll be nowhere near the Antifa frontline. He’ll be preening in safety behind the riot cops.
Throne gained his online reputation pushing the ideology of the “dark triad,” a mixture of narcissistic, sociopathic behaviors that Red Pill types believe are the ultimate secret to financial success, public recognition, and of course, sexual conquest. As part of this exaltation of psychopathic symptoms, he tries to typify the “warrior cult” persona that so many MRAs, Gaters, Freepers, and other “dark enlightenment” poseurs use as a substitute for a backbone and a personality. It is the cornerstone of toxic masculinity to equate physical conflict and psychological manipulation to legitimate male identity, while downplaying the value of sympathy and cooperation.
But Ivan takes it an extra step, proposing a laughable, Bushido-esque lifestyle:“Gold and glory don’t care if you publicly bedded a stunning blonde and left her sticky and exhausted and sore in front of a crowd. Gold and glory are not about image or publicity or fashionable displays. Gold and glory are about death, power and the dark world.” ~ 3 Steps to Gladiator Power
“Your entire life is preparation for any fight for survival. Do not leave that survival to chance… There are no referees in your fight for survival… You must accept without outrage or indignation that another man plans to take your life and destroy your existence. There cannot be hope of pity or expectation of gentleness or wish for his forbearance. You must accept the dark world as it is.” ~ How to Fight Like a Psychopath
“As long as your adversary breathes he is capable of rising and ensuring your death. When killing, certainty is demanded of you in the pursuit of your own survival. Do not guess.”
This is the heart and soul of the buffoonish “dark triad” rubric. It’s a delusional view of one’s self as a masculine, warlike hero in a world of helpless thralls. It’s a storybook journey through a gritty movie universe of harsh amorality, where only the strong survive — a schoolboy’s daydream taken to a revolting conclusion. With this Social Darwinist, knockoff Patrick Bateman identity comes one of the foundational fascist tenets: the equating of compassion with weakness, and weakness with unworthiness of inclusion in the national identity. Umberto Eco categorized this as a fundamental column of the fascist power structure:For Ur-Fascism there is no struggle for life but, rather, life is lived for struggle. Thus pacifism is trafficking with the enemy. It is bad because life is permanent warfare… In fact, the Leader, knowing that his power was not delegated to him democratically but was conquered by force, also knows that his force is based upon the weakness of the masses; they are so weak as to need and deserve a ruler. Since the group is hierarchically organized (according to a military model), every subordinate leader despises his own underlings, and each of them despises his inferiors. This reinforces the sense of mass elitism.”
And this delusion of conquest, of course, brings us right back to Trump’s popularity in the alt-right. He’s their “strong man” leader, despite being a paunchy septuagenarian. He “tells it like it is” and stands up to political correctness, by lying endlessly and shrinking from conflict immediately. He’s a successful, ruthless businessman who’s bankrupted four casinos and couldn’t follow through with his promise to remain totally self-funded. In short, he’s an overgrown child masking his insecurity through name calling and generic misogyny– a model student of the manosphere if ever there was one.
MISOGYNY AND STRICT GENDER ROLES
Like the rest of the alt-right, Ivan possesses an endless wellspring of hatred, condescension, and insecurity surrounding women. Unlike MRM and Red Pill devotees, he is usually careful to fine-tune the tone of his written pieces so as to maintain a smidgen of plausible deniability. But his writing quickly wears this veneer thin whenever he speaks on the subject of women and sex:“The principle of hypergamy often drives, to the dissolution of the female, an unattractive carousel process of bedding male after male while in her attractive young adulthood and her sexual glow is at its prime. This does wonders for her self-esteem and sexual experience but detracts from her market worth and severely degrades the calculation of her wife value.” ~ 10 Ways to Calculate Her Wife Value
“Committed feminists are nearly universally unhappy, bitter and complaining whiners who refuse to accept the reality of the dark world and insist on subservient behavioral and intellectual conformity with their silly and obnoxious ideology.” ~ 10 Ways to Calculate Her Wife Value
“Bit by bit, the damaged and deranged woman will assuage her abandonment fears by insidiously infecting your life and your time with her control.” ~ 3 Red Flags of the Damaged Woman
For those not in the know, “hypergamy” is a term the MRM adopted to shame women for having “too much sex,” a statement which bases itself off of an arbitrary male threshold of tolerance for how sexually active a woman should be.
Notice the stale, telltale pattern of patriarchal thinking: women are to be valued based on their usefulness and acceptability in a man’s eyes, and held to a lower standard because of a presumed inferiority. This is the point of unification between Ivan and the rest of the alt-right, an agreement around male supremacy based on the misguided belief that males of the species are meant to be dominant, and that a “feminization” of modern men is bringing about the destruction of civilization. Nevermind that genuine human evolution improved our adaptability by moving away from this unnecessary gender dichotomy which is more pronounced in our less-evolved sister species.
The natural, intrinsic counterpart of male fanaticism is female repression; it’s as simple as that. To keep one elevated, the other must be devalued. This belief has been demonstrated by every significant figure in the alt-right, including Milo’s derogatory remarks towards women, trans identity, and feminism:“Everyone knows that becoming a feminist makes a woman less marriageable, more crass and generally just unpleasant to be around. But does it also make them uglier?… This may explain why so many angry, lesbianic placard-wavers look like they’ve been hit by a bus.”
“Men on the other hand dominate high paying STEM majors like Electrical Engineering. Women are free to study engineering, and often make fine engineers. But why on earth would feminism feel the need to shoehorn women into studying a subject they don’t want to?”
“Feminism is like the Netherlands: it owes its existence to a network of dykes fighting the forces of nature.”
This rhetoric has caused real damage over time; Ivan’s own suspicion that every woman is, at heart, a conniving succubus is echoed in the manifesto of Elliot Rodger.
TPUSA is, unquestionably, taking part in a continuation of the behaviors exhibited during Gamergate and the surge of Reddit-based male supremacist movements during 2014. Before the alt-right gained legitimacy in mainstream politics, they were propped up by the hatemongering and abusive tactics deployed against critics of pop culture’s rampant disregard for the female, the non-cishet, and the non-white. This component of the alt-right was, and remains, a reactionary movement dedicated to preserving a dominant gender by intimidating the opposition, nothing more or less than a contemporary rebirth of the He-Man Woman Haters Club.
Turning Point will furnish as evidence of their gender-neutrality their Women’s Leadership event, and their numerous female members. This omits the fact that as adherents of Donald Trump, they support the agenda of an admitted sexual predator and open misogynist, irrespective of the gender of this or that supporter specifically — that’s to say nothing of their ties to Milo, or to Steve Bannon, who once said that leftist women only oppose female conservatives because they are “a bunch of dykes that came from the Seven Sisters schools.” Tokenism is not a satisfactory defense against such deafening inhumanity.
David Duke Celebrates Christmas by Calling Transgender Children ‘Confused’ and Smearing Gay Men as ‘Predators’
DECEMBER 23, 2016
They’re dreaming of a white Christmas.
On a recent episode of David Duke’s podcast, the ex-Klan leader was already celebrating Christmas. He’s “one of those people that really, really loves the Christmas traditions and values,” he admitted. “I just can’t tell you how it makes my heart sing to hear Christmas carols and the people in the Christmas spirit of love, and the beauty, the kindness, the traditions, the values.”
And, being that he’s a white supremacist, Duke had to make things creepy and racist, boasting about Christmas as a “European tradition” and a “celebration of children.” But all is not well for David Duke. It seems National Geographic’s latest issue featuring a transgender girl has soured his Yuletide spirit, since he thinks LGBT folks are gross and wrong.
On the cover, he said, “it shows a little boy of 9 years old dressed as a girl with red dyed hair,” which exemplifies how we are “turning reality and turning the world on its head.” That young girl is “actually a boy with a penis, to be frank about it, pretending to be a girl,” he claimed, before accusing her and other transgender children of “pretending” in order to get attention.
“This is Jewish propaganda,” he whined. “The entire homosexual movement is led by Jews, in and out.
Users browsing this forum: norton ash and 12 guests