Masculinities of the far right

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Masculinities of the far right

Postby American Dream » Tue Jun 21, 2016 9:17 pm

MONDAY, JUNE 20, 2016

Radical Islamists and the American Far Right: Cousins of the Terrorist Kind

The gay community in Los Angeles, seemingly, got very lucky last weekend. Especially compared to their counterparts in Orlando.

A 21-year-old Indiana man with a car full of guns and bomb-making chemicals was arrested by Santa Monica police Saturday. He told police he was going to the Los Angeles gay-pride parade later that day, but didn’t say what he had in mind.

In the car was an astonishing arsenal: a loaded AR-15 assault rifle rigged to allow 60 shots to be fired without pausing, two other loaded rifles, a stun gun, a hunting knife, loads of ammunition, and a trunkful of chemicals mixed and ready to explode as a car bomb. It soon emerged that the man – James Wesley Howell of Charlestown – had a history of violent confrontations and gun-related criminal charges, and was fleeing charges of child molestation when he left Indiana.

The situation spoke ominously of an imminent domestic-terrorism attack – especially in light of the massacre that had occurred at the gay nightclub Pulse in Orlando late Saturday. However, since none of his arsenal was used and no violence committed, Howell was only charged with a variety of felonies related to bomb and gun possession. The parade went off without notable incident, though anti-gay protesters were present and visible.

The outcome stood in stark contrast to what occurred that same evening at Pulse, when a 29-year-old New York-born Floridian of Afghani descent named Omar Mateen walked in with a semiautomatic rifle and began blasting patrons at will, leaving 49 people dead and another 54 wounded before Mateen himself was killed by police. Mateen claimed to a 911 dispatcher that he was acting on behalf of the Islamic State in Syria (ISIS), though in fact he had had no previous affilitation with these radical Islamists.

The Orlando massacre sparked an Islamophobic backlash, with some radicals calling for the immediate deportation of all Muslims from the United States and arming U.S. citizens in response. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump used the occasion to declare himself “right” for his earlier declarations about Muslims, and doubled down by reiterating his earlier call for Muslims to be banned from entering the United States. He also suggested that President Obama might be secretly conspiring on behalf of the terrorists.

In the meantime, reporting on the potential terrorist attack on the Los Angeles gay-pride event was subdued, since whatever Howell had been planning was diverted when police pulled him over in a traffic stop and found the arsenal. It was further complicated by the eventual discovery that Howell was himself bisexual, and his friends and family indicated he had no known animus toward gays and lesbians.

In a similar vein, it soon emerged that Mateen had actually frequented Pulse and had advertised on gay hookup forums, raising further doubts about the extent of his supposed Islamic radicalism. FBI director James Comey told reporters that he was “highly confident” that Mateen had been radicalized through the Internet, and was not acting on behalf of international terrorist organizations.

The ongoing questions about the motivations of both Mateen and Howell made murky at best any public understanding of the two incidents – which were seemingly unconnected, especially when it came to the specific motives and backgrounds of the actors involved. One seemed clearly inspired by Islamist anti-western rhetoric, while the other seemed at most fueled by the typical far-right-wing loathing of gays with an added twist of self-loathing.

Yet they were in fact deeply connected by the simple reality that both represented acts of domestic terrorism directed at LGBT targets, and both occurred on the same evening, separated only by a few hours. And coming to terms with these acts – both in a realistic sense and with the hope of taking action that actually prevents them from bubbling up in the first place – requires understanding them as closely related, two aspects of the same vicious and hateful coin: right-wing extremism.

The murders, and the near-miss, this weekend were not, of course, the first time that gay and lesbian establishments have been the targets of terrorist acts. Indeed, this sort of violence is hauntingly familiar to anyone who has tracked the history of hate crimes and other vicious acts that have been the horrifying reality for most members of the LGBT community for the past half-century and longer. Indeed, LGBT people are the minority group most likely to attract hate-crime violence in America, and have been for some time.

Until recent years, the violence has emanated primarily from two sources: hate groups, particularly neo-Nazi and skinhead groups as well as various Klan organizations, all of whom have placed the LGBT community as one of their most loathed targets; and far-right evangelical Christians, particularly those who claim that the Bible demands the death penalty for homosexuality, and the radicals who act on those beliefs.

Here’s a brief history of domestic terrorism directed at LGBT people in the United States:

May 12, 1990: Several members of the neo-Nazi Aryan Nations organization from Hayden Lake in northern Idaho are arrested and charged with plotting to kill dozens, if not hundreds, of patrons at Neighbours, a Seattle gay bar. Their plan included a “kill zone” strategy in which the explosives would be placed inside the bar, with other bombs placed outside it; the plotters intended to call the bar, warn that a bomb was about to go off, and then set off the secondary charges as the disco cleared out, maximizing the number of fatalities. A trio of “Aryans” were arrested at their motel with a van stockpiled with pipe-bomb parts, a .12-gauge shotgun, a .38-caliber revolver, a stun gun, knives and a pile of hate literature. A fourth man was arrested in Idaho for the plot. Three of the men were convicted and sent to federal prison.


Continues at: http://dneiwert.blogspot.com/2016/06/ra ... n-far.html
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Masculinities of the far right

Postby Karmamatterz » Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:43 am

From a link AD posted:
"Until recent years, the violence has emanated primarily from two sources"

The article goes onto place blame upon neo Nazi skinheads as well as various Klan organizations. Then it refers to single event, from 26 years ago.

Here you go AD, more bait for your chum bucket. This event isn't 26 years old like the one you most recently posted about.

Muslim Extremist Arrested for Murder of Gays in Seattle
http://www.clarionproject.org/analysis/ ... ys-seattle
"Brown lured in his victims using a phone app named Grindr that uses GPS coordinates to facilitate meetings between homosexuals. The victims, Ahmed Said and Dwone Anderson-Young, were at a gay club when Said told their associates they were going outside to meet someone."

http://blogs.seattletimes.com/today/201 ... th-murder/

http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/reli ... d=20439151

Religious Fanatic Claims to Have Murdered Gay Men
Ali Muhammad Brown Says He Shot Dwone Anderson

http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-new ... ed-killer/
Said was driving Anderson-Young home from R Place, a gay club on Capitol Hill, when they were shot. Brown had reportedly met up with Said over a gay social-networking app, connected with the two men outside the club that night and got into Said’s car, according to charges.

“The murders took place less than 17 minutes after two witnesses saw Ali Brown leave with the victims in Said’s car. There is no evidence to suggest that Said and/or Anderson-Young were armed, and these murders do not appear to be motivated by robbery, drugs or any other crime,” Seattle police Detective Cloyd Steiger wrote in investigative documents.
User avatar
Karmamatterz
 
Posts: 828
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:58 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Masculinities of the far right

Postby American Dream » Wed Jun 29, 2016 1:17 am

Sure, but that does not disprove the thesis of the article.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Masculinities of the far right

Postby American Dream » Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:49 pm

http://foolsofvinland.blogspot.com/2016 ... s-mad.html








American Dream » Fri Nov 27, 2015 6:53 pm wrote:
Free Hjalti!


Image
Mugshot of Maurice Thomson Michaely, aka "Hjalti".


Someone's been a bad, bad boy, and it looks like it was Maurice Thomson Michaely, also known as "Hjalti" by his buddies, the Wolves of Vinland.

Maurice has a problem with lighting African American Baptist Churches on fire. Seems Maurice just can't help himself.


Image
Mt. Pleasant Baptist Church



According to court documents obtained through a Circuit Court of Virginia Criminal Case search, Michaely is apparently, currently serving a 2.5 year sentence, and owing $249,721.98 in restitution.


Image

Image
(Images courtesy of Virginia Courts Case Information)



A posting on Facebook by Wolves of Vinland head honcho Paul Waggener says that their wolfbrother Hjalti was sentenced to 2.5 years in prison.



Image


One photo posted on June 11, 2014 shows Hjalti with "666" scratched into his wrist. In the photo, Hjalti seems to be all smiles. Scott Greer, an Associate Editor at The Daily Caller "likes" the post.



Image
Scott Greer, Associate Editor at The Daily Caller likes Paul Waggener's post showing Maurice
Michaely in prison. Note the "666" scratched into Michaely's wrist
.



Image
Scott Greer, Associate Editor at The Daily Caller



Paul Waggener posted a second photo on June 11, 2014, which shows him talking with the "incarcerated wolf" Hjalti from behind the glass. Among those who "liked" the post were Devin Saucier (ex-Youth For Western Civilization), and Jack Donovan, who will be speaking at Richard Spencer's National Policy Institute event titled "Become Who We Are" in October of this year.


Image
Paul Waggener visits convicted arsonist Maurice Michaely in prison.
White Nationalists Devin Saucier and Jack Donovan like Waggeners post.



Continues at: http://foolsofvinland.blogspot.com/2015 ... jalti.html
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Masculinities of the far right

Postby American Dream » Sat Jul 02, 2016 9:09 am

From Frank Ocean:

I read in the paper that my brothers are being thrown from rooftops blindfolded with their hands tied behind their backs for violating sharia law. I heard the crowds stone these fallen men if they move after they hit the ground. I heard it’s in the name of God. I heard my pastor speak for God too, quoting scripture from his book. Words like abomination popped off my skin like hot grease as he went on to describe a lake of fire that God wanted me in. I heard on the news that the aftermath of a hate crime left piles of bodies on a dance floor this month. I heard the gunman feigned dead among all the people he killed. I heard the news say he was one of us. I was six years old when I heard my dad call our transgender waitress a faggot as he dragged me out a neighborhood diner saying we wouldn’t be served because she was dirty. That was the last afternoon I saw my father and the first time I heard that word, I think, although it wouldn’t shock me if it wasn’t. Many hate us and wish we didn’t exist. Many are annoyed by our wanting to be married like everyone else or use the correct restroom like everyone else. Many don’t see anything wrong with passing down the same old values that send thousands of kids into suicidal depression each year. So we say pride and we express love for who and what we are. Because who else will in earnest? I daydream on the idea that maybe all this barbarism and all these transgressions against ourselves is an equal and opposite reaction to something better happening in this world, some great swelling wave of openness and wakefulness out here. Reality by comparison looks grey, as in neither black nor white but also bleak. We are all God’s children, I heard. I left my siblings out of it and spoke with my maker directly and I think he sounds a lot like myself. If I being myself were more awesome at being detached from my own story in a way I being myself never could be. I wanna know what others hear, I’m scared to know but I wanna know what everyone hears when they talk to God. Do the insane hear the voice distorted? Do the indoctrinated hear another voice entirely?


http://frankocean.tumblr.com/post/14624 ... -are-being







American Dream » Wed Mar 09, 2016 10:18 pm wrote:
A Kind of Grace

By Hannah Black

A few years back, I was called out, or challenged, for using transphobic language. I know from this experience that it hurts to be experienced as hurtful, or at least that it stings the pride to be wrong. But I was wrong, and now I know it. I would have been no less wrong for not knowing I was wrong, no less hurtful if no one told me they felt hurt. Like the writers of ungenerous caricatures of campus politics, I don’t enjoy being yelled at, or hearing that I’ve wounded someone, or being made to feel ignorant. My first response is also a kind of panicked cringe, or a lashing out: No, you can’t mean me! It’s you who are wrong! But I did, eventually, thankfully, realize that my suspicion of trans people was based on the worst kind of self-justifying nonsense. There is no reason why my sense of someone else’s gender should override their own. I am grateful to the people who yelled at me, told me that I’d hurt them, and made me feel my ignorance, to get me to this now-obvious point. The experience was not intellectually limiting, or an attack by the thought police: to the contrary, my realization about the complicated untruths of gender, and of my own previous bigotry, was one of the most intellectually expansive experiences of my life. It released me into a new, gentler conception of my own body and the bodies of others. It brought new people into my life and gave me a greater, sometimes scary, sense of possibility.

Don’t the columnists and op-ed writers ever have the terror and joy of becoming suspicious of their certainties? Because of my race, perhaps, some things came easier: it is not hard for me to understand that whiteness comes with social rewards that are subtended by violence against those outside the magic circle. I mean not only that, as the child of a black father, I could sense from an early age that the appearance of my body triggered strange reactions in white people. I am also referring to how, as the relatively light-skinned and white-assimilated black child of a white mother, I became aware of the ways I benefited from racial privileges. Although it’s not anywhere near as hard as magnetizing and managing other people’s racism, it is a strange feeling to carry around the benefits accrued from histories of violence. Often innocently, just by being lighter-skinned or cis or white or male, you remind people of things that they are forced to bear and that you don’t have to. But the innocence evaporates, I think, when you can’t receive other people’s anger with grace, because the anger is a kind of grace: it insists on the importance of experience. Acknowledging this does not seem to me to be intellectually stultifying or quasi-fascist or any of the other labels that are applied to campus organizers. It is only a recognition of the fact, at once banal and extraordinary, that race is a complex constellation of historical phenomena that we all carry around as if it inhered in our bodies.

I think I know why, when given the opportunity, some people will cling to their faith in dubiously self-evident facts (“sex and rape can always be clearly distinguished”), in tautologies (“a woman is a woman”), in a narrowly shared “common sense.” It is hard to perceive yourself as invested with advantages, even as subjectively meager an advantage as a socially favored gender position, let alone to perceive that advantage as politically important. Perhaps because of this, I have met few people as painfully preoccupied with their own vulnerability as straight white men, who often seem to hear analyses of gender domination and white supremacy as if they were only claims about the relative happiness or suffering of individuals. Yes, we know that many white men are very unhappy, we have read the midlife-crisis novels and seen the quarter-life-crisis movies, and conversely we all know about the death-defying inventiveness and joy of people whose culture and communities are under erasure: black, queer, and so on. The politics of safety and violence (i.e., race and gender) concern not only affect but social organization and history above all.



Excerpted from: https://harpers.org/archive/2016/03/a-kind-of-grace/
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Masculinities of the far right

Postby American Dream » Wed Jul 06, 2016 10:04 am

Next on the White Power Chopping Block: Jason Sulser

Image
Jason Sulser wearing the Thundercats T-Shirt with fellow League of the South member and friend Dennis Durham behind him during last September's neo-Confederate rally in Washington, DC.

The Virginia Flaggers/League of the South are getting rocked with this development, as well they should. One of their biggest organizers got caught with a lot of child pornography. And we mean a lot.

RAPPAHANNOCK COUNTY, VIRGINIA – A neo-Confederate activist who has been a prominent face in the Virginia Flaggers as well as an associate of the White Supremacist and secessionist League of the South, and who was recently escorted out of a Donald Trump rally after unfurling a Confederate flag, has been arrested on charges of possessing child pornography.

Jason Charles Sulser, 39, of Stafford, VA, was arrested June 23 and charged with 45 counts of possession, reproduction, distribution, solicitation, and facilitation of child pornography. According to Virginia statutes, each charge carries with it a five to twenty year sentence He is currently incarcerated at the Rappahannock County Jail in lieu of bail. The amount of bail, if any, and future court dates are unavailable at the time of this posting.

Image
Jason Sulser shouts into a megaphone at a protester during a rally last July that he organized in his hometown of Stafford, VA that brought out neo-Nazi Ron Doggett and Scott Terry, a close friend and partner of neo-Nazi Matthew Heimbach.

Sulser has been a regular fixture at rallies and events put on by the Virginia Flaggers, a neo-Confederate group who’s Facebook page says is “A group dedicated to the promotion of and education in flagging as a way to protect and defend all Confederate heritage, and to the support of all who are willing to join in.” Despite pronouncements that they are not a hate group, it is Sulser, along with his friend League of the South’s Dennis Durham, who organizes the rallies in the state of Virginia that the Flaggers attend. Sulser is also the administrator for the Central VA Confederate Flag Rallies Facebook page, and in September a rally he and Durham organized in Washington, DC saw the gathered neo-Confederates chased out of town by a crowd that gathered to oppose them.

In December, Sulser, after unfurling a Confederate flag at a Trump rally in Manassas, VA, was escorted from the venue by police, the only reason given was his flag was blocking the view for others attending the event for the eventual presumptive Republican nominee for President. While not charged with any crime in that case, Sulser has been arrested for other offenses in the past as well, including domestic violence.


http://idavox.com/index.php/2016/07/05/ ... on-sulser/
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Masculinities of the far right

Postby American Dream » Wed Jul 06, 2016 12:48 pm

Britain First: Feminism and Fascism
by Niamh McIntyre

With Muslims now the principal target of the far-right, the political terrain has shifted and it is co-opting the language of women's liberation.
First published: 03 October, 2014

This summer, Britain First, a splinter group of the British National Party (BNP) and the fastest-growing far right group in the UK staged a series of ‘mosque invasions’ in Bradford, Glasgow, Luton and London, among other places. The aggressive and confrontational nature of the actions succeeded in grabbing the mainstream media’s attention. It was their Mosque invasion in Crayford, South London though which drew my attention for a different reason: the way Britain First have hijacked the language of women's liberation to foster Islamophobia.

The stated motive for the Crayford ‘invasion’ was gender equality. The ‘activists’ demanded the removal of ‘sexist’ signs which denote separate entrances to the mosque for men and women. The Crayford video reveals Britain First’s attempt to align women's rights and the agenda of the far right.

With nearly 400,000 likes on Facebook, Britain First is in the process of overtaking the BNP in terms of its popular support and the scope of its activities. At first little more than a social media platform circulating racist memes, the movement quickly turned to a programme of grassroots direct action. Its founders are Jim Dowson (who stepped down in June of this year because he felt the movement had become too extremist) and Paul Goulding. Dowson, a former Calvinist Minister who helped run the BNP from 2007 to 2010, is also a key organiser of the UK Life League, a controversial pro-life group who have harassed schools and clinics in the name of ‘Christian’ values. His co-founder Goulding is also BNP renegade, a former councillor for Swanley, Sevenoaks.

The emphatic militarisation of the group’s image and supporters marks out Britain First from the highpoints of popularity previously reached by the EDL or the BNP. Members have been consciously styled as ‘activists’ organised in regional brigades and battalions to form a national ‘street defence organization’. While members have not armed themselves, it has been reported that they have acquired a ‘fleet’ of British Army armoured Land Rovers, which have been deployed in their ‘Christian Patrols’ in East London.

Theirs is a movement with a very conscious and distinctive public image: and images of women, both white and Muslim, are an integral part of their brand, and in very different ways. Traditionally, membership of far right groups in the UK has been overwhelmingly male, with women’s issues sidelined or ignored. However, as Islam is increasingly the principal target for groups such as Britain First, the political terrain has shifted, and the far right is now co-opting the language of gender equality.

‘The problem is, as women, we fought long and hard in this country for equality, and you are taking us back hundreds of years with your segregation.’ says a female Britain First member in the Crayford video. ‘When you respect women we’ll respect your mosques, and you’ve got signs out there segregating men and women’ a male colleague adds.

It’s not often you see far-right extremists objecting to gender binaries, and, obviously that not what a viewer of the Crayford video is really witnessing. But Britain First, whose videos are always careful to show female activists, have understood the PR value of espousing gender equality. The group have produced literature on the subject; their report ‘Women In Islam’ is available to download as a PDF from their website. Its sensational documentation of the far-right bogeyman, the Muslim grooming gang, is combined with coverage of Female Genital Mutilation, an issue on which feminist groups are vocal and active.

Is there any underlying concern for women’s rights here? Perhaps among some members, but if so it is highly misguided. What is clear is that among the group’s leadership there is a conscious and cynical effort to reproduce the discourse of gender inequality for their own divisive and stigmatising agenda.

Britain First aim to create a false dichotomy between the West and Islam in terms of the treatment of women. Their brochure cites some passages for the Qu’ran, claiming that, ‘Mohammed treated women with total contempt and considered them no more than slaves and property’. Given that the group are a self-proclaimed Christian party, it’s worth considering some of the misogynistic attitudes that run through certain Biblical passages. Consider Exodus 20:17, which runs as follows: ‘You shall not covet your neighbour’s wife, or his servant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbour.’ The reputedly more liberal New Testament has a similar outlook on women: ‘Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord.’ (Ephesians 5:22) This like-for-like comparison may be a little reductive, but it is important to note that all Abrahamic religion reinforce misogynistic values in their scripture.

In another official Britain First video, Paul Goulding claims that ‘in this country, since the suffragettes, women have had equality.’ For Britain First, ‘radical Islam’ has reignited sexism which civilized societies like our own outlawed in the early 20th century. Their mission statement sets out a vision of their ideal society in which there is no ‘radical Islam… leading to the suppression of women’.

This is of course a laughably simplistic view of women’s history. And yet this false dichotomy is a common silencing tactic. As a feminist concerned about rape culture, the gender pay gap and sex workers’ safety in the UK, I have often encountered people telling me to be grateful I’m not in Saudi Arabia, a sentiment which projects sexist and misogynistic practises, onto a far-off, Orientalist dystopia.

The reason for the far-right’s sudden interest in women’s liberation is the pressing need to rebrand. The perceived machismo and violent tendencies of far right parties have traditionally limited their appeal to working-class white men. By involving a greater number of women under this pretext of gender politics, Britain First are able to broaden their appeal ahead of the general election, in which it appears they will field candidates.

This tokenism was also visible in the heyday of the EDL, an organization with a specific women’s division: the EDL angels. An important precursor to Britain First in terms of re-framing the discourse of the far-right, the EDL had prominent Jewish and LGBTQ divisions, and similarly adopted the language of liberalism for an explicitly anti-liberal agenda

For Britain First, women are not only an ideological, but a physical battleground. In a Guardian article on the role of women in the BNP, Martin Durham, author of Women and Fascism, asserted that in spite of superficial modernisation and increased women’s participation ‘The most important thing for the far Right is still to ensure that white women have more children’. Like the National Front, Britain First ‘is concerned to reverse those trends which make for a decline in our population qualitatively as well as quantitatively.’ However, in a strategic move, this concern has been disguised with tokenist concern for gender equality.

It may be disguised, but it is not invisible. The emphasis on the need for more white children, which encroaches upon women’s reproductive freedom, emerges from the group’s party political broadcast, filmed ahead of next year’s general election. In-between glowing images of ‘our brave boys’ and Enoch Powell memes, a series of scare-mongering statistics attempts to invoke a reproductive battleground. In the same way that Muslim women are segregated from ‘free’ Western women in Britain First’s campaigns, here the implicit narrative is of a race to repopulate Britain. The video stresses the reproductive threat of Muslim women: ‘If population trends continue, by 2050 Britain will be a majority Muslim nation.’ Not, however, if enough white women have children: in a not-so-subtle call, Britain First claims that ‘for a society to remain the same size the average woman has to have 2.1 children’. Without any sense of irony, Britain First call out an unnamed ‘hate fanatic’, quoted as saying ‘Have more babies and Muslims can take over the UK!’, for employing their very own tactic of espousing repopulation.

The rhetoric of women’s liberation, then, is entirely superficial and is being used to push an extreme, far-right agenda. We must acknowledge, however, that Britain First are not merely co-opting the language of liberalism and the left, they are a product of a broader political culture in which Islamophobia has been normalised. It is this same culture which recently allowed then Education Secretary Michael Gove to declare that schools must root out ‘radical Islam’ and promote ‘British values’. The recent Rotherham child abuse scandal is another example. The increasingly accepted theory that the police officers involved were afraid of pursuing Pakistani or Muslim perpetrators for fear of seeming racist has led to multiple echoes of Britain First’s alarmist literature on ‘Muslim Grooming Gangs’; whilst the Home Secretary Theresa May recently declared in Parliament that ‘institutionalised political correctness’ was to blame for Rotherham’s failures. In Britain First then, we see not just a cynical cooption of the language of liberation, but a grim reflection of the worst of mainstream political culture.


http://www.newleftproject.org/index.php ... nd_fascism
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Masculinities of the far right

Postby American Dream » Tue Oct 18, 2016 11:44 am

Anti-Feminists Think Rape Victims Deserve It: Profiles by VICE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4PDFaRPKM0
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Masculinities of the far right

Postby Searcher08 » Fri Oct 21, 2016 4:33 am

Such a poor article above

Karen Straughan is great.

I recommend seeing her in action in this short video excerpt if you are not familiar with her.

User avatar
Searcher08
 
Posts: 5887
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 10:21 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Masculinities of the far right

Postby American Dream » Fri Oct 21, 2016 10:47 am

Jesse Lee Peterson Leads Protest Telling Trump Accusers To ‘Stop The War On Men’

By Miranda Blue | October 20, 2016 4:04 pm

As we noted recently, conservative activist and radio host Jesse Lee Peterson has been unabashedly channeling the misogynistic “men’s rights” movement in his defenses of Donald Trump, including recently comparing the women who have accused Trump of sexual assault to Satan. Peterson took things to a new level on Tuesday when he led a protest outside the Los Angeles office of Gloria Allred, the attorney representing two of Trump’s accusers, accusing her of waging a “war on men.”


Continues at: http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/jess ... ar-on-men/
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Masculinities of the far right

Postby American Dream » Fri Nov 18, 2016 8:41 am

I find this trend in the "Men's Movement" to be truly creepy. This is a conspiracy, if there ever was one:


The Wolves of Vinland push a hyper-masculine image, politics and practice inspired partially by Evola. This has resonance in modern America, where professed Men’s Rights Activists (MRAs) have been loudly beating the antifeminist drum over the last decade or so. Simply put: the threat of liberated women has some men pissing in their pants. This panic is due to a failure of imagination in which gains in women’s freedom cannot be seen by some men as anything except a loss to their own. As we have stated in a recent article, reactionary hypermasculinity has gained traction with disaffected working class whites in large numbers. The radical solution to the “problem” of feminism posited by Evola and others is a return of heroic masculine warrior-kings or aristocrats, to bring about a rebirth of the currently declining age.


The Wolves of Vinland fully buy into this neo-masculinist, warrior worldview. This can be seen in their many online photographs in which physical fitness, toughness, fight training and “manliness” can be contrasted with the mundane world around the viewer. Many of these photographs are taken by the internationally known professional rock and roll photographer, and local Portlander, Peter Beste.


The Wolves of Vinland are essentially an Evolian cadre group wrapping itself in neo-pagan imagery. Many of the organizers such as Paul Waggener and Jack Donovan have strong ties, if not partial ownership in popular powerlifting gyms. Paul and Donovan use an extensive network of social media accounts to promote their motivational fitness and strength training regimes, Paul’s of course are for sale online.

Image

Their events, such as the ones held at their crowdfunded hall "Ulfheim" in Virginia, are ritually opened with bouts of boxing and MMA style fighting. The Ulfheim compound contains several off-the-grid houses based in rural Lynchburg, VA and was crowdfunded with the help of white nationalists cultural networkers Counter-Currents Publishing, as well as a marketer for conservative American political website World Net Daily. Not only is overt violence used internally in the group it is part and parcel of their political warrior ideology. To the point that Jack Donovan's webstore sells various merchandise stating "Violence is Golden". Those on the far-Right often celebrate physical violence to assert dominance; for the Wolves, violence has become a holy act.


Image

From the website http://www.foolsofvinland.blogspot.com/



http://rosecityantifa.org/articles/the- ... northwest/
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Masculinities of the far right

Postby American Dream » Mon Nov 21, 2016 3:54 pm

Grinding the Greer

The day after the presidential victory of Donald Trump, Daily Caller deputy editor Scott Greer posted this on his twitter account:

Image


The Alternative Right is a growing fascist/racist movement with a connection and investment in the Trump campaign . Is our boy Greer one of the Alternative Right? Good question! Let’s take a look …


GREER AND THE WOLVES OF VINLAND

Now it’s time to take a leap down the LARPy rabbit hole. This group is a little hard to describe, because yes, they are that weird, moronic and bizarre. Fortunately, there are a few links we can provide you with, including: wikipedia; a blog dedicated to reporting about them; the Daily Beast did a piece and so did the Wolves’ sympathizer (member?), the pro-white-anti-women macho gay man Jack Donovan (if you’re looking for that sort of thing). We also have written a little bit up about Donovan and his connection to the white nationalist movement.

The WoV group was founded by the self absorbed and narcissistic cosplaying brothers Paul and Matthias Waggener. Just a little run down of who and what they are. They are a male dominated Heathen/Pagan/Asatru group based on white identity, motorcycles and weight lifting. They have a plot on land in Lynchburg, Virginia, where they sacrifice animals, play with the slaughtered animal’s blood and get drunk in their campground called Ulfheim.

What makes this group so interesting is that it has attracted some of Scott Greer’s friends who were mentioned above, as well as Greer himself.

Image

Here we have Scott Greer wearing a t-shirt from that white nationalist youth group previously mentioned, Youth for Western Civilization. He is a the WoV camp spot called Ulfheim. Devin Saucier is standing next to him with sunglasses.


More at: https://overthrowdotcom.com/2016/11/18/ ... the-greer/
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Masculinities of the far right

Postby American Dream » Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:50 pm

Man Who Held ‘Better To Grab A P***y Than To Be One’ Sign At Pro-Trump Rally Has Ties To White Nationalists
Who would have guessed?

Image
Devin Saucier holds his sign at a recent event in support of Donald Trump.


Devin Saucier has attended events with prominent “suit-and-tie” white nationalists; is associated with a Virginia-based group that the Daily Beast described as “white-power wolf cult”; and co-founded a controversial student group at Vanderbilt University that fought against diversity.

Saucier has appeared in photos of gatherings from the Wolves of Vinland, “a neo-pagan group that celebrates a guy [Maurice “Hjalti” Michaely] who tried to burn down a black church,” according to the Daily Beast. A Facebook screenshot on a website that follows the group shows a user named Devin Saucier “liking” a post that shows Michaely in prison and says, “free Hjalti you fucking pricks.”


More at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/don ... 047594bc5f
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Masculinities of the far right

Postby American Dream » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:04 am

"This is why the euphemistically-described “alt-Right” alignments of white supremacists and white nationalists around Trump like to accuse their (male) opponents of being “cucks” (or “cuckolded”), because it raises anxiety about patriarchal rights and paternity. It is also why Jo Cox’s murderer regarded her support for asylum seekers as tantamount to being a “race traitor.” From an oikonomic view, the regulation of sexuality and gender ensures the legitimate rights over and reproduction of “household property,” whether that household is envisaged as the private household of familial affection or the family company or the enthno-nation. And whiteness is a property, as Cheryl Harris carefully explained long ago. Liberal concepts of “self-regulation” still turn on someone or something ensuring—whether through personalized authority, or abstractly encoded in private or public law—conformity to the rules of heritable and transmissible property rights. The state can narrow down to guaranteeing just this, through force of law and administration, and it will not be “small government” but instead a massive, authoritarian and intrusive project. And this is, precisely, the terms on which race, gender, and sexuality emerge as objects of regulation, criminalization, and control. It is, of course, far easier to buy into the myth that “neoliberalism means deregulation or free markets” when one exists on the naturalized because normative side of those demarcations."

— Angela Mitropoulos, ‘POST-FACTUAL’ READINGS OF NEOLIBERALISM, BEFORE AND AFTER TRUMP
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Masculinities of the far right

Postby American Dream » Sat Dec 10, 2016 6:15 pm

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... -breitbart

We need to talk about the online radicalisation of young, white men

Abi Wilkinson

With the appointment of Breitbart News’s chair to Trump’s staff we need to be clear about the links between misogyny, racism and neofascism on alt-right websites

Image
Donald Trump’s head of strategy, Steve Bannon, backstage during a campaign event in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, on 1 November.

Tuesday 15 November 2016

For several years now, I’ve had a dark and fairly unusual hobby. When I’m alone and bored and the mood strikes me, I’ll open up my laptop and head for a particularly unsavoury corner of the internet.

No, not the bit you’re thinking of. Somewhere far worse. That loose network of blogs, forums, subreddits and alternative media publications colloquially known as the “manosphere”. An online subculture centred around hatred, anger and resentment of feminism specifically, and women more broadly. It’s grimly fascinating and now troubling relevant.

In modern parlance, this is part of the phenomenon known as the “alt-right”. More sympathetic commentators portray it as “a backlash to PC culture” and critics call it out as neofascism. Over the past year, it has been strange to see the disturbing internet subculture I’ve followed for so long enter the mainstream. The executive chairman of one of its most popular media outlets, Breitbart, has just been appointed Donald Trump’s chief of strategy, and their UK bureau chief was among the first Brits to have a meeting with the president-elect. Their figurehead – Milo Yiannopoulos – toured the country stumping for him during the campaign on his “Dangerous Faggot” tour. These people are now part of the political landscape.

On their forums I’ve read long, furious manifestos claiming that women are all sluts who “ride the cock carousel” and sleep with a series of “alpha males” until they reach the end of their sexual prime, at which point they seek out a “beta cuck” to settle down with for financial security. I’ve lurked silently on blogs dedicated to “pick-up artistry” as men argue that uppity, opinionated, feminist women – women like myself – need to be put in their place through “corrective rape”.

I know about the “men going their own way” movement, which is based around the idea that men should avoid any sort of romantic or sexual relationship with women. I’m aware of “traditional marriage” advocates, who often argue that you should aim to marry a very young woman as she’s likely to be easier to control. I also learned the difference between an “incel” who is involuntarily celibate, and a “volcel” who makes a deliberate choice to avoid sexual activity, and sometimes also masturbation, often in the belief that ejaculation depletes their testosterone and saps them of masculine power.

It’s hard to know whether pseudonymous online posters are telling the truth about their offline identity: the individuals making up the manosphere seem to skew younger on average, but be drawn from all walks of life. There are socially awkward, video game-loving teenagers, bitter divorcees and Ivy League-educated millennials who feel women don’t afford them the respect and admiration they deserve. There are men who claim to be highly successful at attracting sexual partners, but hate women all the same.

One thing I noticed early on is that the community seems to be largely white. And that’s evident because race comes up, a lot. Sometimes, in the form of a kind of racial pseudo-science that advocates use to explain the dynamics of heterosexual relations. The age-old racist argument – that black men are “taking our women” – is made regularly. Racist slurs are chucked around casually. There seems to be a significant overlap with organised white supremacy.

Even taking into account its rising prominence, it would be absurd to claim that the alt-right is primarily responsible for electing Donald Trump. More than 60 million people voted for him, the majority of whom have probably had little or no contact with this strange, angry online movement. Most were people who also voted Republican in previous elections.

A minority were previous Obama voters, mainly concentrated in lower income brackets. Just over half of white women went for the guy who was facing rape charges, and who was caught on camera asserting that he would “grab them by the pussy” if he felt like it. Turnout was also depressed, through voter suppression and also because some Democrat voters felt uninspired by Hillary Clinton’s candidacy.

What is true, though, is that some of his most passionate, core supporters seem to be regulars on the blogs and forums I’m talking about. It’s no surprise that pretty much every prominent manosphere figure came out in support of Trump, and Clinton’s gender isn’t the only relevant factor.

Neofascists treat these websites as recruitment grounds. They find angry, frustrated young men and groom them
Prior to the election, members of the alt-right online community often warned each other to keep their Trump support secret to avoid being “stigmatised” by more liberal peers. Now they’re celebrating openly. They’re gleeful about some of the harshest policies Trump promised: mass deportations, defunding Planned Parenthood, the wall. They feel like they have scored a victory against feminism and multiculturalism. They’re glad that white men are, once again, in control. They were filled with fury at the thought they had been toppled from their rightful place at the top of the social hierarchy; this is vindication. The old order has been defeated, this is their world now.

When we fret about young people leaving western countries and going to fight with Isis, it’s common to focus on the role of the internet in their political radicalisation. It’s time we discussed the radicalisation of angry, young white men in a similar way. The manosphere gave us Elliot Rodger. He was a regular on the forum “PUAhate” – populated by bitter men who had tried the techniques advocated by so-called “pick-up artists” to attract women and failed.

Reading through the posting history of individual aliases, it’s possible to chart their progress from vague dissatisfaction, and desire for social status and sexual success, to full-blown adherence to a cohesive ideology of white supremacy and misogyny. Neofascists treat these websites as recruitment grounds. They find angry, frustrated young men and groom them in their own image. Yet there’s no Prevent equivalent to try to stamp this out.

Much has been written about financial hardship turning afflicted white communities into breeding grounds for white supremacist politics, but what about when dissatisfaction has little to do with economic circumstance? It’s hard to know what can be done to combat this phenomenon, but surely we have to start by taking the link between online hatred and resentment of women and the rise of neofascism seriously.
American Dream
 
Posts: 19946
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 4:56 pm
Location: Planet Earth
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to Data & Research Compilations

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests