Elvis » Tue Dec 22, 2015 6:52 pm wrote:It seems difficult to draw conclusions about placement without knowing exactly when each photo was taken.
My guess is the harness/strap was cut free from the body, then the body handcuffed, all requiring some moving of the body.
Here's the body, already handcuffed and no harness/strap in sight:
http://isitgossip.com/wp-content/upload ... 2-480w.jpg
The rifle was probably picked up, checked and unloaded—note the rifle on the curb has its magazione removed, as does what appears to be a semiauto handgun with its magazine removed and left next to the pistol.
That still wouldn't necessitate moving the rifle and the handgun several yards down the road and placing them right beside where the body had been. That is a deliberate falsification of the crime scene. It is planting evidence, namely planting a gun/guns. It makes it look as though the guns were within easy reach of his right hand where he fell.
Was he even armed at all?
Does it make sense that Farook was trying to run away, take cover, and only made as far as the opposite curb?
No. There were 23 cops aiming and firing at him (according to the LA Times), and there had been for some considerable time before he could even have left the SUV. (See the windscreen with the 30+.bullet holes.) We're also told there had just been a "shootout", that the cops fired 380 bullets in total, and that the couple had fired "about 75" bullets. The Islamist Bonnie and Clyde were, we're told, armed and extremely dangerous. So why should those 23 cops let James Cagney Syed Farook just get out of the SUV -- heavily armed -- and cross that broad highway unscathed? (Also: pristine highway, no bloodstains or bullets or any other debris.)
There's got to be a shit ton of police dashcam video, and probably other video, that we need to see.
Surveillance-cam video too -- and video from the police helicopter we have now been explicitly informed was there and filming.
Do you think we'll ever see it?
(on edit: "heavily armed" added.)