The first thing I notice about this article is the complete lack of a date, and clues towards this are absent in the text too. This sort of implies that the ideas therein exist in some sort of continuum where timeless absolutes overcome small modern day ruminations.
This is actually consistent with a religious theme, but it becomes a little strained when addressing modern day politics and especially so when it is about 'The New...' something. The missing context means that the attempts at political analysis fall flat and don't enable a developmental timeline to be properly established in the mind of the reader, one is expected to digest the offered data without a personal framework.
The buzz concerning The New Right occurred about a decade ago, but also a few alt-right figures are mentioned too, bringing it a bit more towards the present day.
Then I noticed this in the piece:
...Druidry: While groups such as the Order of Bards, Ovates, and Druids are fiercely egalitarian, smaller groups (including the ADF and AoDA) sometimes have overlaps with Traditionalist and Tribalist thought, particularly in ADF’s focus on Indo-European ‘hearth cultures.’ Also, the ideas of Oswald Spengler (a favorite amongst many New Right theorists) have gained popularity through some “Long Descent” druids.
Well here's a familiar piece of bullshit. the association between Spengler and the Far Right was made in one of AD's recent
'antifascistnews' pastes, something which I chose to highlight and deride. The fact that it pops up here indicates that cross fertilisation of unexamined nonsense is taking place, and possibly brings us almost right up to the present day.
There's no such thing as 'Long Descent Druids' BTW. A risible term that, as well as being fictitious, seems a hamfisted attempt to point to just one Druid, John Michael Greer.
" Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism"