brekin » Fri May 20, 2016 7:22 pm wrote:
I'm just not grokking this. This is like the early days last century of euthanizing the disabled and other perceived "defectives". Also, people who are heavily medicated, institutionalized can end up agreeing to anything. I don't doubt many of these people were feeling hopeless but I wonder how much being "socially isolated" influenced their chances of being euthanized? If there are no significant others or family to say hold up, you want to do what? then you are basically property of the state. Which I guess even in a social democratic country with a high standard of living and life satisfaction can be pretty fucking tragic.
grokking-- that's one I had to look up. I agree, that people who are heavily medicated, institutionalized can end up agreeing to anything.
Because that's exactly what is happening, not 'only' to the mentally ill, but to increasing numbers of elderly, chronically ill, suddenly disabled due to an accident, stroke, etc....... And the vulnerable (eventually everyone) really do become, basically, the property of the institution, instead of, or in addition to the State. It is fucking tragic. It's among the reasons why suicides, along with murder-suicides, are increasing among an aging population. And suicide leaves a hell of a lot of suffering for surviving relatives and friends. If there are no significant others or family to say hold up, you want to do what?, then that person really is socially isolated and lonely. Which can then lead to suicide, a very lonely death. As is being in an institution or nursing home and not being ones own agent in deciding on a choice between continued suffering vs. a 'good' death. Left in the hands of the State/institution, individuals at the end-of-life become property before dying as a statistic; no surprise there.