We are protectors not protesters fighting N Dakota Pipeline

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: We are protectors not protesters fighting N Dakota Pipel

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:24 pm

This backdown is probably a feint then Luther.
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10594
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Perelandra » Thu Dec 08, 2016 12:34 am

Exactly, and I do not share optimism about people vs the chthonic mysteries of petroleum.
“The past is never dead. It's not even past.” - William Faulkner
User avatar
Perelandra
 
Posts: 1648
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 7:12 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: We are protectors not protesters fighting N Dakota Pipel

Postby Joe Hillshoist » Thu Dec 08, 2016 2:29 am

Basically you have to break the company.

They have a shitload to lose and every day of delay and every bit of bad publicity for them brings them closer to going broke. Unfortunately (for them) their shareholders will be screwed but I don't really give a shit about shareholders in companies that wreck shit for a living.

Otherwise they will keep coming back. Then once they are gone you need to keep track of whoever gets/buys the entitlements, mining leases or whatever and be ready to do it all again.

And again and again.
Joe Hillshoist
 
Posts: 10594
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 10:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: We are protectors not protesters fighting N Dakota Pipel

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Dec 16, 2016 10:11 am

Pipeline 150 miles from Dakota Access protests leaks 176,000 gallons

By Chandrika Narayan, CNN
Updated 5:32 PM ET, Tue December 13, 2016


CANNON BALL, ND - NOVEMBER 30: Snow covers Oceti Sakowin Camp near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation on November 30, 2016 outside Cannon Ball, North Dakota. Native Americans and activists from around the country have been gathering at the camp for several months trying to halt the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. The proposed 1,172 mile long pipeline would transport oil from the North Dakota Bakken region through South Dakota, Iowa and into Illinois. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Officials: Pipeline will be re-routed

Amy Goodman describes covering Standing Rock

Pipeline protesters vow to remain
Tires burn as armed soldiers and law enforcement officers stand in formation on Thursday, Oct. 27, 2016, to force Dakota Access pipeline protesters off private land where they had camped to block construction. The pipeline is to carry oil from western North Dakota through South Dakota and Iowa to an existing pipeline in Patoka, Ill. (Mike McCleary/The Bismarck Tribune via AP)
What's up with the Dakota Access Pipeline?

Pipeline protesters defy evacuation order

Protester: 'It will be a battle'
Police unleashed a water cannon on people protesting the Dakota Access Pipeline in North Dakota.
Protesters fighting pipeline are staying put

Meet Mni Wiconi, or Water is Life
Now Playing
Veterans stand in solidarity in Standing Rock
US Navy veteran John Gutekanst from Athens, Ohio, waves an American flag as an activist approaches the police barricade with his hands up on a bridge near Oceti Sakowin Camp on the edge of the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation on December 4, 2016 outside Cannon Ball, North Dakota.
Native Americans and activists from around the country gather at the camp trying to halt the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. / AFP / JIM WATSON (Photo credit should read JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)
Police have their say about Standing Rock
CANNON BALL, ND - DECEMBER 05: Military veterans are briefed on cold-weather safety issues and their overall role at Oceti Sakowin Camp on the edge of the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation on December 5, 2016 outside Cannon Ball, North Dakota. Over the weekend a large group of military veterans joined native Americans and activists from around the country who have been at the camp for several months trying to halt the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. Yesterday the US Army Corps of Engineers announced that it will not grant an easement for the pipeline to cross under a lake on the Sioux Tribes Standing Rock reservation. The proposed 1,172-mile-long pipeline would transport oil from the North Dakota Bakken region through South Dakota, Iowa and into Illinois. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Protesters stand strong despite blizzard

Dakota Access Pipeline fight isn't over

Victory for Native Americans in pipeline fight
A crowd celebrates at the Oceti Sakowin camp after it was announced that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers won't grant easement for the Dakota Access oil pipeline in Cannon Ball, N.D., Sunday, Dec. 4, 2016. (AP Photo/David Goldman)
Drumming, chanting over Dakota pipeline halt
dakota pipeline Tribe Announcement sot _00000000.jpg
Tribe chief on Dakota pipeline: 'We made it'
CANNON BALL, ND - NOVEMBER 30: Snow covers Oceti Sakowin Camp near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation on November 30, 2016 outside Cannon Ball, North Dakota. Native Americans and activists from around the country have been gathering at the camp for several months trying to halt the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. The proposed 1,172 mile long pipeline would transport oil from the North Dakota Bakken region through South Dakota, Iowa and into Illinois. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Officials: Pipeline will be re-routed
exp Amy Goodman on standing rock_00011414.jpg
Amy Goodman describes covering Standing Rock

Pipeline protesters vow to remain
Tires burn as armed soldiers and law enforcement officers stand in formation on Thursday, Oct. 27, 2016, to force Dakota Access pipeline protesters off private land where they had camped to block construction. The pipeline is to carry oil from western North Dakota through South Dakota and Iowa to an existing pipeline in Patoka, Ill. (Mike McCleary/The Bismarck Tribune via AP)
What's up with the Dakota Access Pipeline?

Pipeline protesters defy evacuation order

Protester: 'It will be a battle'
Police unleashed a water cannon on people protesting the Dakota Access Pipeline in North Dakota.
Protesters fighting pipeline are staying put

Meet Mni Wiconi, or Water is Life

Veterans stand in solidarity in Standing Rock
US Navy veteran John Gutekanst from Athens, Ohio, waves an American flag as an activist approaches the police barricade with his hands up on a bridge near Oceti Sakowin Camp on the edge of the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation on December 4, 2016 outside Cannon Ball, North Dakota.
Native Americans and activists from around the country gather at the camp trying to halt the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. / AFP / JIM WATSON (Photo credit should read JIM WATSON/AFP/Getty Images)
Police have their say about Standing Rock
CANNON BALL, ND - DECEMBER 05: Military veterans are briefed on cold-weather safety issues and their overall role at Oceti Sakowin Camp on the edge of the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation on December 5, 2016 outside Cannon Ball, North Dakota. Over the weekend a large group of military veterans joined native Americans and activists from around the country who have been at the camp for several months trying to halt the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. Yesterday the US Army Corps of Engineers announced that it will not grant an easement for the pipeline to cross under a lake on the Sioux Tribes Standing Rock reservation. The proposed 1,172-mile-long pipeline would transport oil from the North Dakota Bakken region through South Dakota, Iowa and into Illinois. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Protesters stand strong despite blizzard

Dakota Access Pipeline fight isn't over

Victory for Native Americans in pipeline fight
A crowd celebrates at the Oceti Sakowin camp after it was announced that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers won't grant easement for the Dakota Access oil pipeline in Cannon Ball, N.D., Sunday, Dec. 4, 2016. (AP Photo/David Goldman)
Drumming, chanting over Dakota pipeline halt
dakota pipeline Tribe Announcement sot _00000000.jpg
Tribe chief on Dakota pipeline: 'We made it'
CANNON BALL, ND - NOVEMBER 30: Snow covers Oceti Sakowin Camp near the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation on November 30, 2016 outside Cannon Ball, North Dakota. Native Americans and activists from around the country have been gathering at the camp for several months trying to halt the construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline. The proposed 1,172 mile long pipeline would transport oil from the North Dakota Bakken region through South Dakota, Iowa and into Illinois. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Officials: Pipeline will be re-routed
Story highlights
"Any time oil gets into water ... we take it more seriously," North Dakota official says
Spill is 150 miles from Cannon Ball, where protesters have fought construction of the Dakota Access pipeline
(CNN)Activists who have demonstrated for months against the Dakota Access Pipeline may have some fuel to justify their protests.

A spill has occurred 150 miles from Cannon Ball, North Dakota, where protesters have fought construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline.
Officials estimate 4,200 barrels of crude oil have leaked.
Officials estimate 4,200 barrels of crude oil have leaked.
State officials estimate 4,200 barrels of crude oil, or 176,000 gallons, have leaked from the Belle Fourche Pipeline in Billings County.
Of that amount, 130,000 gallons of oil has flowed into Ash Coulee Creek, while the rest leaked onto a hillside, said Bill Suess, spill investigation program manager at the North Dakota Department of Health. Built in the 1980s, the pipeline is 6 inches in diameter and transports about 1,000 barrels of oil daily, he said. The leak happened December 5.
"Any time it gets into water, we respond differently and we take it more seriously," Suess said. He said more than 100 people are working to clean up the spill. Investigators are still trying to determine the cause, he said.
The incident happened less than a three-hour drive from Cannon Ball, where protests led by the Standing Rock Sioux tribe have simmered for months over the 1,172-mile Dakota Access Pipeline. The $3.7 billion project would connect oil-rich areas of North Dakota to Illinois, where the crude oil could then be transported to refineries on the Gulf Coast or the East Coast.
The demonstrations have turned violent at times.
Military veterans march in support of protesters at the Standing Rock Sioux reservation on December 5.
Military veterans march in support of protesters at the Standing Rock Sioux reservation on December 5.
The Standing Rock Sioux tribe sued the US Army Corps of Engineers after the pipeline was granted final permits in July. The tribe said the project will not only threaten its environmental and economic well-being, but will also cut through sacred land. It said construction would destroy burial sites, prayer sites and culturally significant artifacts.
In early December, the US Army Corps of Engineers announced it would look for an alternate route for the pipeline, although the pipeline is nearly complete.
Companies behind the project have pushed back.
Energy Transfer Partners and Sunoco Logistics Partners said they expect to complete the construction without additional rerouting. They have taken legal action, asking a federal court to allow them to complete the pipeline.
The Dakota Access Pipeline would transport 470,000 barrels of oil a day across four states, Energy Access Partners said.
It will pass through an oil-rich area in North Dakota with an estimated 7.4 billion barrels of undiscovered oil. This oil would be shipped to markets and refineries in the Midwest, East Coast and Gulf Coast regions
http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/13/us/pipeli ... d=32367416
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: We are protectors not protesters fighting N Dakota Pipel

Postby seemslikeadream » Sat Dec 17, 2016 2:19 pm

Feds withheld key documents from Standing Rock Sioux
Still, Trump’s election reduces chances that the Dakota Access pipeline will be permanently blocked.
Elizabeth Shogren DC DISPATCH Dec. 14, 2016 From the print edition

The Army made a stunning admission earlier this month when it announced its decision to require a deeper environmental review and more extensive consultation before deciding whether to grant an easement for the Dakota Access Pipeline.

In its consultations with the Standing Rock Sioux about the pipeline crossing underneath Lake Oahe within a half mile of the reservation, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers purposefully withheld key studies that could have helped the tribe evaluate the risks. One report modeled damage from potential spills; another weighed the likelihood of spills; a third compared alternative routes and discussed the environmental justice concerns raised by the project. The revelation highlights the federal government’s perception of its limited responsibility to consult with tribes even on matters that could threaten its welfare.


Thousands of people camped at Oceti Sakowin camp in Cannon Ball, North Dakota, a few days after the Army Corps of Engineers announced it would deny the easement to build the pipeline under Lake Oahe. A few hundred are prepared to stay for the winter.
Andrew Cullen
The contents of these documents, which have still not been released to the public, are unknown. “There’s this secret stuff that even we don’t have in the litigation. We were aware there were documents not available to us and we’ve been asking for them, ” Jan Hasselman, the tribe’s chief lawyer, says.

Kristen Carpenter, Oneida Indian Nation visiting professor of law at Harvard Law School, was amazed to learn that the government had denied these documents to the tribe. “To me that’s stunning,” she says. “People have been camped out and facing violence for months, when this information has been available all along. It’s the very information that would have allowed them to participate more substantially. The tribes didn’t have enough information at their hands to be fully informed.”

Carpenter believes the Corps should have done a more thorough analysis and consulted more fully with the tribe from the beginning. “I’ve been doing this work my entire adult life and I can’t believe how egregious this is.”

But the Army maintains it both was and is on firm legal footing. “I want to be clear that this decision does not alter the Army’s decision that the Corps’ prior reviews and actions comported with legal requirements,” Jo-Ellen Darcy, assistant secretary of the Army wrote in a memorandum Dec. 4. “Rather my decision acknowledges and addresses that a more robust analysis of alternatives can and should be done under these circumstances, before an easement is granted for the Dakota Access Pipeline to cross the Missouri River on Corps land.” Her memo directs the Corps to release those documents that it had withheld from the tribe.

In early December, the thousands of protesters camped at the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation celebrated what appeared to be a massive victory. Without the easement, the $3.8 billion pipeline project was stalled. But the fight is far from over.

The 1,172-mile pipeline, designed to carry Bakken crude oil to refineries in Illinois and beyond, would pass within half a mile of the reservation and underneath Lake Oahe, which the tribe relies on for drinking water and treaty fishing and hunting rights. “They’re making a stand because they’re afraid of what might happen if there’s a spill, which happens all the time,” says Native American attorney John Echohawk, founder of the Native American Rights Fund. An earlier pipeline route that would have crossed the Missouri River 10 miles north of Bismarck was rejected for a variety of reasons, including potential risk to the water supply for that larger, whiter, more affluent community.

The “water protectors” at the Oceti Sakowin camp near the reservation responded to the news with resolution as well as joy. John Bigelow, an enrolled Standing Rock Sioux, wore a black beanie reading “Water Is Life” as he told a news conference: “We are not going anywhere.” But later that day, a fierce winter storm hit, and Standing Rock Sioux Chairman Dave Archambault II urged protesters to leave. Thousands did. “While this phase of the struggle relied largely on the protectors at camp, this next stage will be focused on the legal battles,” Archambault said in a statement.

Army Corps denies crucial DAPL easement
Army Corps denies crucial DAPL easement
Read more
The Standing Rock Sioux’s triumph — delivered in the waning days of the Obama administration — is only temporary. The Army Corps committed to a more robust analysis of the pipeline’s potential environmental impacts, likely halting construction for months or even a couple of years. But President-elect Donald Trump supports the pipeline, in which he held a financial interest until recently. So the future remains murky at best: “What will happen in an anti-science, anti-Indian and pro-fossil fuel administration, we’ll just have to see,” says Hasselman, an Earthjustice attorney.

The protests gained steam in late summer, after the Standing Rock Sioux filed suit to stop pipeline construction, claiming that the government failed to adequately consult with the tribe and that the Corps’ expedited environmental review was not thorough enough. After the tribe asked for a preliminary injunction to stall construction, a federal judge in September ruled that the Corps had met its obligation to consult with it, saying that tribal representatives repeatedly failed to attend meetings. In response to protests and political pressure, however, the Department of the Army, the Justice Department and the Department of the Interior stepped in to block the project while the Corps reconsidered.

That led up to the Corps deciding that a full environmental impact statement is necessary. Experts say it will be difficult for the Trump administration to evade this time-consuming requirement, which entails extensive study and significant input from the tribe and the public. Failure to conduct it would probably be seen by a judge as “arbitrary and capricious,” says Carpenter. The same is true for the Army’s commitment to a higher level of consultation with the tribe, including releasing those documents formerly withheld from the tribe.

Trump, however, told Fox News Sunday in mid-December that he’d solve the impasse “very quickly” after taking office, though he didn’t explain how. Dakota Access LLC, the pipeline company, asked a judge to intervene, claiming that an easement is unnecessary because the government already gave permission for the pipeline to cross the lake. In its court filing, Dakota Access calls the new requirement for a lengthy review process “part of a transparent capitulation to political pressure.”

The companies behind DAPL don’t think they’ve lost
The companies behind DAPL don’t think they’ve lost
Read more
The judge has refused to rule immediately, saying he’ll consider the company’s request early next year. The tribe’s lawyers seem confident that it will fail but some industry experts disagree.

The Standing Rock Sioux and their supporters hailed the Obama administration’s decision to require further review and to release the documents, even though they didn’t get what they wanted: a permanent rejection of the easement to cross the river. “It buys time in this fight,” says Raúl Grijalva, D-Ariz., the ranking Democrat of the House Natural Resources Committee.

Grijalva visited Standing Rock in September and says he was impressed: The protesters include representatives of many tribes and environmental and civil rights activists from around the country and abroad, strongly united and prepared for the attacks on the environment, poor communities and tribes that they expect to see once Trump takes office. “Those fights are not going away; they’re going to intensify,” he says, adding that next time, it won’t take months for protests to start: “That would happen so quickly.”
http://www.hcn.org/issues/48.22/feds-ad ... rock-sioux
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: We are protectors not protesters fighting N Dakota Pipel

Postby Luther Blissett » Wed Jan 18, 2017 11:53 am

The National Guard has deployed surface-to-air Avenger missiles to Standing Rock.

The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4990
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: We are protectors not protesters fighting N Dakota Pipel

Postby seemslikeadream » Wed Jan 18, 2017 12:00 pm

Bill Would Make It Legal to Run Over Protesters ‘Unintentionally’

http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/bill-wo ... ntionally/
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: We are protectors not protesters fighting N Dakota Pipel

Postby Cordelia » Wed Jan 18, 2017 1:53 pm

^^^ :shock:
From link SLAD posted:

"Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a driver of a motor vehicle who unintentionally causes injury or death to an individual obstructing vehicular traffic on a public road, street, or highway is not guilty of an offense,” states House Bill Number 1203.

The text doesn’t directly mention protesters, but one co-sponsor, state Rep. Keith Kempenich (R-Bowman), explained the goal.

“[The roads are] not there for the protesters,” he told The Bismarck Tribune in a Wednesday report. “They’re intentionally putting themselves in danger.” He said the bill would shift the “burden of proof” from the driver onto the pedestrian.



2003; so long ago; Gaza, so far away.

Image
The greatest sin is to be unconscious. ~ Carl Jung

We may not choose the parameters of our destiny. But we give it its content. ~ Dag Hammarskjold 'Waymarks'
User avatar
Cordelia
 
Posts: 3697
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: We are protectors not protesters fighting N Dakota Pipel

Postby Cordelia » Wed Jan 18, 2017 3:08 pm




National Guard attempts to quell fear over missile launchers at Dakota Pipeline


By Staff Writer January 18th, 2017 Military News, U.S. Army

Rumors of an “anti-drone missile system” at the site of the Dakota Access oil pipeline were started after pictures were posted on social media on Tuesday.

Jon Ziegler, who describes himself as a “citizen journalist,” spotted the surface-to-air missile launchers at the site. When he posted pictures and a video to Facebook, it quickly went viral, and many commentors believe the system is in place to shoot down any drones in the area.

The missile system was identified as the Avenger Air Defense System, which is a self-propelled surface-to-air missile system that provides mobile, short-range air defense protection for ground units against cruise missiles, unmanned aerial vehicles, low-flying fixed-wing aircraft, and helicopters.

North Dakota National Guard spokesman William Prokopyk attempted to quell the public’s fear of the system’s presence by saying the missile tubes aren’t loaded. He stated, “These systems have observation capabilities and are used strictly in the observation role to protect private property and public safety. There’s no authority to arm them.”

In response to Prkopyk’s statements, on Facebook user stated, “Loaded or not, can you spell I- N- T- I- M- I- D- A- T- I- O- N?”

Fox News reported, “the presence of the system could exacerbate things between the Standing Rock protesters and authorities.”

Police have already reportedly shot down a drone for “operating in a threatening manner.”
http://popularmilitary.com/national-gua ... -pipeline/
The greatest sin is to be unconscious. ~ Carl Jung

We may not choose the parameters of our destiny. But we give it its content. ~ Dag Hammarskjold 'Waymarks'
User avatar
Cordelia
 
Posts: 3697
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: We are protectors not protesters fighting N Dakota Pipel

Postby Luther Blissett » Thu Feb 02, 2017 3:20 pm

Image
The Rich and the Corporate remain in their hundred-year fever visions of Bolsheviks taking their stuff - JackRiddler
User avatar
Luther Blissett
 
Posts: 4990
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: We are protectors not protesters fighting N Dakota Pipel

Postby Cordelia » Thu Feb 09, 2017 8:53 am

Dakota Access Pipeline: ETP firm to resume work immediately

The company building the controversial Dakota Access oil pipeline says it plans to resume work immediately after getting permission from the US Army.


Energy Transfer Partners (ETP) said the remaining work on the pipeline would take about three months to complete.

The $3.8bn (£3bn) project had stalled for months due to opposition from Native American protesters.

The Standing Rock Sioux tribe says the pipeline could endanger its drinking water and desecrate sacred sites.

The final section of the project is a crossing under Lake Oahe that would carry North Dakota oil through the pipeline to Illinois.

The Army had begun further study of the river crossing after contamination fears raised by the Standing Rock tribe, but it notified Congress on Tuesday that it would stop the study and grant ETP permission to continue work.

The decision came after Donald Trump formally backed the project last month in one of his first acts as US president.

Thousands of predominantly Native American protesters have boycotted the pipeline's construction in the state of North Dakota.

The 1,172 mile (1,886km), four-state project is almost finished except for the one-mile stretch under Lake Oahe, where demonstrators have set up protest encampments.

The Obama administration announced in September that it would not allow the project to proceed, but Mr Trump overturned the decision.

The Army's statement on Tuesday said: "The Department of the Army announced today that it has completed a presidential-directed review of the remaining easement request for the Dakota Access pipeline, and has notified Congress that it intends to grant an easement."

An easement is a special permit that allows a company to cross private land. North Dakota's two US senators welcomed the Army's announcement.

Continued..........
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38915797
The greatest sin is to be unconscious. ~ Carl Jung

We may not choose the parameters of our destiny. But we give it its content. ~ Dag Hammarskjold 'Waymarks'
User avatar
Cordelia
 
Posts: 3697
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: We are protectors not protesters fighting N Dakota Pipel

Postby Blue » Thu Feb 09, 2017 9:04 am

Luther Blissett wrote:Image


That is some sick shit.

How will this Battle of the Greasy Grass end?

https://indiancountrymedianetwork.com/h ... -drawings/

Image

Image
User avatar
Blue
 
Posts: 725
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:39 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: We are protectors not protesters fighting N Dakota Pipel

Postby Cordelia » Thu Feb 09, 2017 9:33 am


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59Qe3vrHV2A

That is some sick shit.


Yep, and they don't/never did give a fuck about people, wildlife & environment. It's all about $$$
The greatest sin is to be unconscious. ~ Carl Jung

We may not choose the parameters of our destiny. But we give it its content. ~ Dag Hammarskjold 'Waymarks'
User avatar
Cordelia
 
Posts: 3697
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: We are protectors not protesters fighting N Dakota Pipel

Postby seemslikeadream » Fri Mar 24, 2017 3:58 pm

State Department to approve Keystone pipeline permit on Friday
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-p ... SKBN16U25E
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)


PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests