Cato, '92: The “Green Peril”: Creating the Islamic ...Threat

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Cato, '92: The “Green Peril”: Creating the Islamic ...Threat

Postby MacCruiskeen » Wed Aug 24, 2016 10:25 am

Well, this was bracingly frank :shock: , and remarkably prescient. How many of the "warnings" (of dire consequences) in Hadar's "Policy Analysis" paper were actually recommendations in very thin disguise?


Cato Institute

Policy Analysis No. 177

The “Green Peril”: Creating the Islamic Fundamentalist Threat

By Leon T. Hadar

August 27, 1992

Leon T. Hadar, a former bureau chief for the Jerusalem Post, is an adjunct scholar of the Cato Institute.

Executive Summary

Now that the Cold War is becoming a memory, America’s foreign policy establishment has begun searching for new enemies. Possible new villains include “instability” in Europe—ranging from German resurgence to new Russian imperialism—the “vanishing” ozone layer, nuclear proliferation, and narcoterrorism. Topping the list of potential new global bogeymen, however, are the Yellow Peril, the alleged threat to American economic security emanating from East Asia, and the so-called Green Peril (green is the color of Islam). That peril is symbolized by the Middle Eastern Moslem fundamentalist—the “Fundie,” to use a term coined by The Economist[1]—a Khomeini-like creature, armed with a radical ideology, equipped with nuclear weapons, and intent on launching a violent jihad against Western civilization.

George Will even suggested that the 1,000-year battle between Christendom and Islam might be breaking out once more when he asked, “Could it be that 20 years from now we will be saying, not that they’re at the gates of Vienna again, but that, in fact, the birth of Mohammed is at least as important as the birth of Christ, that Islamic vitality could be one of the big stories of the next generations?”[2]


Read the Full Policy Analysis
 PDF (103.18 KB): http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/f ... /pa177.pdf

http://www.cato.org/publications/policy ... ist-threat


The pdf's 24 pages long. Some extracts:

Islam does seem to fit the bill as the ideal post-Cold War villain. "It's big; it's scary; it's anti-Western; it feeds on poverty and discontent," wrote David Ignatius, adding that Islam "spreads across vast swaths of the globe that can becolored green on the television maps in the same way that communist countries used to be colored red."
...

The Making of a "Peril"
The Islamic threat argument is becoming increasingly popular with some segments of the American foreign policy establishment.
They are encouraged by foreign governments who, for reasons of self-interest, want to see Washington embroiled in the coming West vs. Islam confrontation. The result is the construction of the new peril, a process that does not reflect any grand conspiracy but that nevertheless has its own logic, rules and timetables.

The creation of a peril usually starts with mysterious "sources" and unnamed officials who leak information, float trialballoons, and warn about the coming threat. Those sources reflect debates and discussions taking place withingovernment. Their information is then augmented by colorful intelligence reports that finger exotic and conspiratorialterrorists and military advisers. Journalists then search for the named and other villains. The media end up findingcorroboration from foreign sources who form an informal coalition with the sources in the U.S. government and helpthe press uncover further information substantiating the threat coming from the new bad guys.

In addition, think tanks studies and op-ed pieces add momentum to the official spin. Their publication is followed bycongressional hearings, policy conferences, and public press briefings. A governmental policy debate ensues, producingstudies, working papers, and eventually doctrines and policies that become part of the media's spin. The new villain isnow ready to be integrated into the popular culture to help to mobilize public support for a new crusade. In the case ofthe Green Peril, that process has been under way for several months.
[13]

A series of leaks, signals, and trial balloons is already beginning to shape U.S. agenda and policy. Congress is about to conduct several hearings on the global threat of Islamic fundamentalism.

...

The Gulf War has already provided the Turks, Saudis, Egyptians, and Israelis with an opportunity to revive the American engagement in the Middle East and their own roles as Washington's regional surrogates. Now that the Iraqi danger has been diminished, the Islamic fundamentalist threat is a new vehicle for achieving those goals.

...

Western Democratic Hypocrisy

Those moves were explicitly backed by most of the rulers in the Middle East, including the military rulers of Tunisia and Libya, who face similar opposition from Islamic fundamentalist forces, and at least implicitly by France and theUnited States. "By neither criticizing nor approving the Algerian army's action, Western countries cloak their real attitude--that democracy is fine, up to a certain point--in necessary ambiguity," noted Jim Hoagland.[73]

American intellectuals--including many who advocate a Wilsonian global democracy crusade--exhibit a peculiar lackof enthusiasm for democratic objectives when it comes to the Middle East. There, to secure American hegemonic power, they typically support a "realist" approach that includes a U.S. military alliance with, and support for,authoritarian Arab regimes. When U.S. policies incite popular demand for change and reform, the neoconservativessolve their cognitive dissonance by proclaiming that the demonstrators in the streets represent the forces of reaction, the Green Peril, and that the spread of democracy would be served by containing that threat
.[74]

The events in Algeria highlight the weakness of the global democracy crusade and suggest that it might be nothing more than a way to rationalize, in the eyes of Americans and international opinion makers, policies that are really based on cold, calculated realpolitik considerations. To put it another way, behind the mask of the American global missionary is the American global policeman.

Washington's approach means that the United States ends up backing ruling authoritarian elites and thereby incurring a backlash from popular opposition forces that resent its interventionist policies. Those policies inherently erode America's power as a role model. The search for imaginary Jeffersonian democrats ends up as a search for enemies,and the Islamic fundamentalists are the latest candidates.


Islam and Democracy

The sense of confusion and arrogance that lies at the root of the global democracy paradigm was exposed by the U.S.reaction to the events in Algeria. The United States could have pursued a detached policy toward Algeria, where U.S.interests could have been affected only minimally, and could have encouraged France and the southern European`states to take the lead. Washington could have recognized the complexity of the situation, which does not involve justgood guys vs. bad guys, and welcomed the gradual moves toward political freedom. Instead, the application of the Green Peril frame resulted in a destructive knee-jerk reaction.

U.S. policies also reflected the fallacies behind the Islamic fundamentalist scare and America's image of political Islam as a monolithic anti-Western movement that will return the Middle East to the dark ages.

...
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Cato, '92: The “Green Peril”: Creating the Islamic ...Th

Postby JackRiddler » Wed Aug 24, 2016 10:51 am

I remember being depressed about the inevitability of this at the time. I'd spent a couple of years hoping that the fall of the Berlin Wall would, by eliminating the definitional enemy on which faith in capitalism and American empire relied, trigger a corresponding collapse in the West (of faith, not society!). Surely the search for the new enemy would fail? I think by 1992 it was obvious that there was a whole array of prospective dragons to slay -- drug barons, yeah right -- but with China so frustratingly and essentially integrated into the shitshow known as the global economy, and with Russia so obviously being plundered from the inside and out, only "Islam" tied to "terrorism" could be pitched as the New Big Bad. In the end, it took a lot of effort at the American taxpayers' expense to beef that up by a variety of violent interventions, sanctions, bombings, invasions, and arming of tyrants and proxy armies, resulting in who knows how many million deaths (none of which ever happened, if go by the current mainstream memory culture). But it finally paid off. The further good news is that we now also have the Democrats' offer of Putin as the Strongman Behind Trump, and the Republicans' return to reliance on those good old invading foreign hordes who have already taken over everything, thanks to the liberals, not to mention the urban youth burning down the cities! Hip hip, hooray.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 15983
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Cato, '92: The “Green Peril”: Creating the Islamic ...Th

Postby MacCruiskeen » Wed Aug 24, 2016 2:20 pm

Had you seen that Policy Analysis before, Jack? I hadn't. I'm still kind of flabbergasted by how in-your-face it is. That first line is something to behold:

In 1992, Leon Hader of The Cato Institute wrote:Now that the Cold War is becoming a memory, America’s foreign policy establishment has begun searching for new enemies.


And on and on it goes: "The Making of a "Peril""; "a new vehicle"; "the application of the Green Peril frame"... Completely unabashed. "We're gonna make up a new bogeyman to scare the plebs and justify the Defense budget! We'll make it the Muslims and we'll call it 'The Green Peril'!"

Pre-Internet, of course (for nearly everyone). Those old lizards probably never anticipated that the paper would become viewable by anyone, instantly, a quarter-century later. But does it make any difference to them that it has done so? Hardly. That may be the single most depressing aspect of all this.
"Ich kann gar nicht so viel fressen, wie ich kotzen möchte." - Max Liebermann,, Berlin, 1933

"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." - Richard Feynman, NYC, 1966

TESTDEMIC ➝ "CASE"DEMIC
User avatar
MacCruiskeen
 
Posts: 10558
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:47 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Cato, '92: The “Green Peril”: Creating the Islamic ...Th

Postby semper occultus » Wed Aug 24, 2016 3:18 pm

.....stuff can be both fake and a real threat.....at least to the average poor bastard in the street......Irish Republicanism was/is a real threat to the British state but the IRA was penetrated and manipulated six ways to sunday by all accounts...likewise the Israelis in relation to say Hamas....
User avatar
semper occultus
 
Posts: 2974
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:01 pm
Location: London,England
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Cato, '92: The “Green Peril”: Creating the Islamic ...Th

Postby slimmouse » Wed Aug 24, 2016 7:08 pm

Heres some particularly interesting context to all of this from a recent edition of the Corbett report, which reinforces the idea that these nut-jobs have their ducks all lined up
wiith their policy papers whilst illustrating a clear dedication to their insanity

slimmouse
 
Posts: 6129
Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Just outside of you.
Blog: View Blog (3)


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests