maco144 » Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:52 pm wrote:DrEvil » Wed Nov 30, 2016 12:48 am wrote:If you're going to post in this thread you should ask questions not just regurgitate indoctrinated Science lies that I've already disproven. Here's the thing with your supposed 'rocket science' - if I am arguing from a model that shows that there is no Universe billions of light years across then your
If you're going to go the "I'm smarter than you" route at least try for some rigor. None of the articles you linked say what you claim they say. The behavior of gravity is perfectly well understood, it's why we can land stuff on other planets with pinprick precision.
The reason why it behaves as it does and the underlying mechanics of it is what they're arguing about, but none of them are saying that it doesn't exist at all.
What you so charitably call proof is so laughable it beggars belief and consists of a series of shockingly stupid youtube videos and graphics coupled with some arguments so moronic they're an insult to morons.
You can't even come up with a coherent explanation for why this centuries long global hoax is taking place.
And since coffin_dodger specifically asked for no one to disagree with him in his electric universe thread I'll say it here: the electric universe theory is a load of crap, garbled nonsense for people who can't handle not understanding something. The universe doesn't give a fuck if you can understand it or not. It will happily kill you if you go pretty much anywhere but Earth.
Oh, and since you mention 'scientism', a made up term usually used by creationists and other religious cretins trying to ignore facts and push their favored deity, I have to ask - are you by any chance deeply religious, and if so, does that inform your worldview (I'm asking because I want to know if I'm arguing with a religious fanatic or not)?
The articles clearly show that there isn't a consensus on what gravity is, how to measure it, what effect it has, etc. Flat Earth takes the next step and does away with it since it can't be found or proven. It does away with standard model and general relativity since we can readily find flaws in both models.
No they don't. The effect it has is pretty bleeding obvious. Things fall down. You still haven't come up with a good explanation for why things fall down and not sideways or up, and no, some nonsense about cardinal directions don't cut it. What is it that decides that an apple should fall down?
The explanation for why the hoax should be obvious and I'm pretty sure we've covered it several times.
If it's so obvious then you should have no problem spelling it out in a couple of sentences..?
Why is this being covered up, who is doing it and what do they gain from doing it?
Scientism is a pretty apt term for people who just regurgitate their laymen indoctrination of globe model / Big Bang Universe.
I believe in God but not in the Abrahamic/Eastern religions. I think whether it was God/Alien/Man who put the dome above is clearly sign of an intelligence way above ours and to me whatever did that belongs in the Pantheon.
So you're a creationist?
And another thing: If the Earth is flat, why is it dark some places while it's daylight in other places? As soon as the sun rises above the horizon it should light up everything, right?
Btw: the "law of perspective" is not a good enough explanation. It's an optical illusion. The sun is powerful enough to punch through that, it doesn't "disappear" with distance.
"I only read American. I want my fantasy pure." - Dave