slimmouse » Thu Sep 22, 2016 10:34 pm wrote:JackRiddler » 22 Sep 2016 00:07 wrote:So until a post or two ago, Soros was a really, really important, nefarious, evil mastermind, singularly responsible for the terrible course of recent world history.
But to an argument showing his actual placement within a particular class of identifiable individuals, some of them clearly more powerful and influential than he, the answer so far is this: Never mind that class! None of them matter, because: the queen and the pope! (First evidence, a story about a BBC reprisal against an editor's story placement, which may not even be due to a royal intervention, but the royalist attitudes among BBC executives. Okay.)
You happened to start a Soros thread. I guess it's no longer interesting. Well, you should start the queen and pope thread -- I hope you do that, on another board, without ever staining this one with your presence again.
Jack your first sentence is an out and out ad hominem lie ( no surprise there)
Your second sentence is bollocks.
And your third sentence indicates is more ad hominem BS.
How is it that some people see you as a smart guy around here?
Anyone not suffering from Dunning-Kruger syndrome can tell that Jack isn't an idiot.
He knows the difference between a sentence and a paragraph. He probably even knows what ad hominem is, and most importantly - he can write coherent sentences with arguments and stuff.