barracuda » Sun Dec 18, 2016 9:28 pm wrote:The same dynamic happens here every time there's a subject for which the basic, fundamental thesis requires a leap of faith: not everyone is interested in taking that leap, and those that already have stepped off the edge of the rabbit hole begin their sanctimonious mewlings. Those sounds are always the same. "You've been brainwashed into disbelieving your own eyes." "Your attempts at analysis are deflections and distractions from my truth." "I'm being bullied for my intuitions." "Thank god there are a few sane individuals left here." "Why are you defending the oppressors/puppetmasters??"
And always, always...
"The persistence and tone of some of the posters here is troubling and suspicious."
Honestly.
Attempting to understand the deep state is not a religion or a suicide pact. Insistence upon owning the only truth is the give away that not only are the arguments weak, but so is the advocate of that argument.
This should be pressed into one of the 12 R.I. Golden Tablets.
FourthBase wrote:guruilla, ditch your drug hangup and interview me.
I love this. But I have no idea what it means.
mentalgongfu2 wrote:This thread is now 90-plus pages. No one is shutting down anyone's discussion, investigation, or whatever,-you-choose-to-call-this-amorphous-thing, and any assertion to the contrary is demonstrably false.
My impression of this thread and my limited participation in it is that any dissenting and/or critical assessment of pieces of the alleged puzzle are being labeled as either partisan bias or off point "diversion" because disproving A doesn't disprove B. This leads to an infinite recursive loop wherein the hypothesis can never be disproven, because it and its component parts are always changing. If the alleged codewords in the Podesta wikileaks emails aren't proof, then it's the art in this house, or the bands at the pizza joint, or his Tweets, or the Besta pizza logo, or whatever...Ad infinitum.
That's all well and good and par for the course in conspirotainment, but the insinuation of nefarious or ideological motives to anyone who presents a questioning attitude is misplaced and unproductive. No one can disprove "Pizzagate" because even the biggest proponents for the "truth" contained therein can't yet say what exactly it is.
Amen. P.G. is like a religion that its proponents haven't decided on what it is yet, just lack of zealousness and non-belief are suspect.