Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
Harvey » Thu Nov 17, 2016 12:38 pm wrote:This kind of feminism tends to apply exclusively to white western women, not for example to the seven hundred thousand widows in Iraq, or those in Libya, Syria, Lebanon or Yemen. In case you think that's a cheap retort, consider all of those women who had education in Afghanistan before western intervention drew in the Soviets leading ultimately to the Taliban. Those women across the middle East who lived in secular states with rights including education now have to fend for themselves against Islamist warlords who are in place precisely to further the interests of feminists like Hilary.
Until Suzanne Moore develops enough intellectual honesty to include them, well, I'm just not buying whatever it is you think you're selling.
Tennessee Woman Indicted for Self-Induced Abortion Faces New Charges
Nov 16, 2016, 4:29pm Teddy Wilson
Pro-choice advocates have pointed to a rash of anti-choice policies pushed through the Republican-held Tennessee legislature since 2014, reducing access to reproductive health care in the state.
Anna Yocca has been charged with aggravated assault with a weapon, attempted procurement of a miscarriage, and attempted criminal abortion.
A Tennessee woman accused of using a coat hanger to try to terminate her pregnancy is facing new criminal charges.
Anna Yocca was charged in December 2015 with attempted first-degree murder, but that charge was reduced in March to aggravated assault.
A Rutherford County Grand Jury on November 12 returned three new charges against Yocca, reported the Daily News Journal. Yocca has been charged with aggravated assault with a weapon, attempted procurement of a miscarriage, and attempted criminal abortion.
Aggravated assault with a weapon and attempted criminal abortion each carry jail terms of three to 15 years and fines up to $10,000; attempted procurement of a miscarriage carries a jail term of one to six years and a fine up to $3,000.
Pro-choice advocates have pointed to a rash of anti-choice policies pushed through the Republican-held Tennessee legislature since 2014 that have reduced access to reproductive health care in the state.
“These acts of desperation will happen more frequently unless the Tennessee Legislature reconsiders its posture about both current and potential anti-abortion legislation and the fetal assault law which allows a penalty of up to 15 years in prison for fetal harm,” SisterReach CEO Cherisse Scott said in a statement last December, shortly after Yocca was arrested.
Yocca allegedly went to her upstairs bathroom in September 2015, filled the tub with water, got in, and tried to “self-abort” her pregnancy with a coat hanger, according to police reports. Prosecutors claim Yocca, who was 24 weeks pregnant at the time, grew “alarmed and concerned for her safety” when she saw blood in the tub.
Her boyfriend took her to St. Thomas Rutherford Hospital’s emergency room, where Yocca delivered a 1.5 pound male baby, who reportedly needed extensive medical care, the Daily News Journal reported. The child was placed into the custody of the Tennessee Department of Children’s Services.
The nursing staff reported that Yocca made “disturbing statements” and admitted that she had attempted to self-induce an abortion.
Yocca is being held at the Rutherford County Adult Detention Center, according to the Daily News Journal. She will be arraigned on the new charges November 28.
http://rewire.news/article/2016/11/16/t ... -103247345
Harvey » Thu Nov 17, 2016 4:38 pm wrote:This kind of feminism tends to apply exclusively to white western women, not for example to the seven hundred thousand widows in Iraq, or those in Libya, Syria, Lebanon or Yemen. In case you think that's a cheap retort, consider all of those women who had education in Afghanistan before western intervention drew in the Soviets leading ultimately to the Taliban. Those women across the middle East who lived in secular states with rights including education now have to fend for themselves against Islamist warlords who are in place precisely to further the interests of feminists like Hilary.
Until Suzanne Moore develops enough intellectual honesty to include them, well, I'm just not buying whatever it is you think you're selling.
Suzanne Moore: Why I was wrong about men
You can't hate them all, can you? Actually, I can.
By
Suzanne Moore
Men. You can’t live with them. You can’t shoot them. Well, you can, but this is the New Statesman. And modern feminism spends most of its life not just bending over backwards, but in the doggy position, saying how much it likes men. “I’m a feminist but . . . I love men.” Obviously I’m being a bit binary here, and when I write “men”, I mean women, blokes, anyone fluid enough basically to be in charge.
I once adhered to this. I didn’t want to put anyone off. I used to call feminism “sexual politics”, because that sounded way more sexy. Hey, I’m no man-hater – on the contrary. Look at me. Men? Can’t get enough of them, the poor, damaged critters. It’s not their fault. They’re as screwed up by the patriarchy as ordinary women, probably even more so.
All the special boys. What about the ones who were abused at public school and now run everything but can’t express their emotions properly? All the man victims, trapped by masculinity. Who could hate them? Their oppression is structural. You can’t hate them individually, can you?
You know what? I can. Please don’t confuse that with bitterness. I am in touch with my emotions enough to know the difference between personal hurt and class hatred. As a class, I hate men. I’ve changed my mind. I am no longer reasonable.
I want to see this class broken. There can’t be even basic equality for women without taking away the power of men – and by that I don’t mean feeling sorry for them because they have no friends or suggesting that they have small genitals. I mean the removal of their power.
When I used to give men the benefit of the doubt, that doubt was suffused with my desire for sex, babies, the whole shebang. It wasn’t difficult to get any of this, although the way in which women are encouraged to do so is stultifying.
Marriage, monogamy – a prison where you build your own walls. Familiarity breeds contempt, but this is the aftermath of romance. If you want to fetishise proximity, domesticity, and storage solutions from Ikea, why not go all the way and be a lesbian? If you want to service someone, have a baby. And if you want to rescue someone, get a dog.
Sure, there can be equitable relationships between men and women, in which one turns into the other’s carer. This is the optimal compromise, the prospectus that no one really gets until it’s too late.
Having tried to live with various mishaps, I realise that this is not for me and it never will be. But then, nor will the kind of reasonable feminism in which we make allowances for men. Because they are men. I have had it all my life: pro-choice marches in which men insist that they walk at the front. A left-wing party that cannot deal with a female leader. The continuing pushing back of women’s rights.
If you are interested in the liberation of women, you’ll find that the biggest barrier to this is men: men as a class. I used to think, “I don’t hate all men.” I had therapy and everything. Now, I think that any intelligent woman hates men. There are very few problems in the world that don’t have, at the root of them, male violence and woman-hating.
The more I hate men (#YesAllMen), the more I don’t mind individual ones, actually, as it is clear that some can be entertaining for a while. Before you even bother whingeing that my hatred of the taskmasters of patriarchy is somehow equivalent to systematic misogyny, to the ongoing killing, rape and torture and erasure of women, know this: I once made exceptions. I was wrong.
Suzanne Moore is a writer for the Guardian and the New Statesman. She writes the weekly “Telling Tales” column in the NS.
Women. You can’t live with them. You can’t shoot them.
Men. You can’t live with them. You can’t shoot them.
"Why are women emotionally and spiritually so much stronger than men?"
Having tried to live with various mishaps, I realise that this is not for me and it never will be. But then, nor will the kind of reasonable feminism in which we make allowances for men. Because they are men. I have had it all my life: pro-choice marches in which men insist that they walk at the front. A left-wing party that cannot deal with a female leader. The continuing pushing back of women’s rights.
If you are interested in the liberation of women, you’ll find that the biggest barrier to this is men: men as a class. I used to think, “I don’t hate all men.” I had therapy and everything. Now, I think that any intelligent woman hates men. There are very few problems in the world that don’t have, at the root of them, male violence and woman-hating.
"Why are women emotionally and spiritually so much stronger than men?"
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests