The MIC controllers

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

The MIC controllers

Postby Harvey » Sun Nov 20, 2016 7:32 pm

I saw a great example of the internet at it's best the other day. At this site they have data sets which can be output in a range of cool graphs, displayed in innumerable ways, cross referenced, arranged however you want and then you can download the print ready artwork at any size as a bitmap or vector graphics.

For instance you arrange current or past heads of state around the world by their body count or by the amount of corporate money they've taken. You can view leading industries by their body count, who they've killed and where. You can view the most prolific serial killers by the race of their victims or their religion.You can make a top ten of the most successful liars in politics. You can see where the greenest states are in the USA, or the dirtiest. You can rank the worlds highest polluters or resource hogs. You can see where the most generous people on earth reside, or the most selfish by various measures. You can plot the consumption of raw materials against their use. You can show how many tons of steel or brass a year are used to kill human beings or how many are used to uplift them from material poverty. Wealth, murder, destruction, creation and innovation, any way you want to view the data you can.

More than all that you can view how much change can be wrought by a reallocation of resources on any scale. You can view the effectiveness of policies against real time data. You can view broken promises by governments, promises kept or you can begin begin to discover what promises have yet to be dreamt.

It's what the internet was made for, it's the single most powerful tool for visualisation I have ever seen. Your imagination is the limit.

Meanwhile:

Another $11.6 Billion for Obama/Trump Wars? Hell No!



President Obama waited until after the election last week to propose an unpopular idea. He asked Congress for $11.6 billion extra — outside the huge existing military budget — for wars. Here’s his letter including all the gory details. Please read it yourself when you begin to hope that I’m making up some of what follows.

This massive pile of money, equivalent to the annual spending that the United Nations says could end the lack of clean drinking water globally, adds between 1% and 2% to U.S. military spending — but is by itself more than the entire military budget of all but 14 other nations on earth, 12 of which top-spending nations are U.S. allies.

This $11.6 billion would be added to another $73.7 billion in off-the-books war spending already appropriated. That’s military spending outside the gargantuan military budget and supposedly for emergency wars that just shockingly arose, although actually for a half-dozen permawars plus basic profiteering and preparation for future slaughters.

While nothing would prevent this new money from being used for any war that the current or next president desires, it is requested in large part for the wars in Afghanistan and Syria/Iraq. That includes supplying other militaries such as the Iraqi, Afghan, and Kurdish armed forces with free gifts of instruments of mass murder, as well as expanding U.S. military facilities in Somalia, Mauritania, Chad, Turkey, and elsewhere.

The unfathomable sum of $11.6 billion would go to fund war efforts that the next U.S. president has sometimes said he wants to end (the arming of fighters in Syria) or not commented on at all. It would also give the Afghan military U.S.-made helicopters so that it no longer uses Russian ones. This follows lobbying by Lockheed Martin and Textron that warned of “tensions over President Vladimir Putin’s military intervention in Ukraine and Syria,” tensions that may not apply come January 20.

Also requested: miniature killer drones that can be launched by U.S. troops in Iraq — troops whose boots are, despite White House rhetoric, on the ground.

Also requested: a big chunk of change for secret operations that Congress is expected to fund with our money despite not knowing what they are. And another for secret research and testing (which sounds less like an “emergency” war than profiteering on the preparations for more wars down the road).

Also in there: funding for a major war on drugs in Libya and West Africa. Not to mention: funds for USAID operations of the sort that have facilitated violent coups in places like Ukraine.

While the President’s request claims to devote 50% to non-defense efforts and includes aid for refugees while funding the creation of more of them, in fact 0% of this is related to defending the United States, and only 14% of people in the U.S. believe these wars are making us safer. Meanwhile, most of the supposedly “non-defense” spending requested is part and parcel of a military mission and devoted to things like “security,” “stabilization,” and “police training.”

A petition has been launched opposing this war bill. One reason it might gain traction, ironically, is that resistance has begun to build against Republican wars (what the large peace movement of 2002-2006 was aimed at). It’s ironic because these are, of course, the wars that President Obama has continued or begun during the last nearly eight years. We can’t know which good and which horrible statements a President Trump will follow through on. But it’s possible that with the right pressure and influences he will end some of these wars — also that, if we cannot prevent it, he will escalate or initiate others. All we can know for sure is that millions of people in the United States will be suddenly more willing to oppose the wars Trump tries to wage.

Some months back, Obama was absurdly talking about undoing his self-created permission to kill anyone anywhere with a missile from a drone, so that nobody would suffer the indignity of being dismembered by a Republican. Yet, now, post-election, Obama has dropped that idea. After all, once you’ve firmly established the presidential power of inventing “laws” and violating “laws” and shredding the “laws” of the previous president, what difference does it make what you try to impose on the next emperor?

Not only is Obama passing along unprecedented powers to spy, imprison, torture, kill, operate in secret, and persecute whistleblowers, but he is now trying to make sure all war operations are abundantly funded for his successor. There ought, in a reasonable world, to be a huge percentage of us across the political spectrum prepared to stop this cold.

http://www.counterpunch.org

http://worldbeyondwar.org/
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4167
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)

Re: The MIC controllers

Postby Iamwhomiam » Sun Nov 20, 2016 7:42 pm

Harvey, that's a bad link.
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The MIC controllers

Postby identity » Sun Nov 20, 2016 7:43 pm

I saw a great example of the internet at it's best the other day. At this site they have data sets which can be output in a range of cool graphs, displayed in innumerable ways, cross referenced, arranged however you want and then you can download the print ready artwork at any size as a bitmap or vector graphics.


This domain has recently been listed in the marketplace at Domainnamsales.com Click here to inquire
FlyingPigs.com


How long ago was "the other day"? The site is, alas, gone!
We should never forget Galileo being put before the Inquisition.
It would be even worse if we allowed scientific orthodoxy to become the Inquisition.

Richard Smith, Editor in Chief of the British Medical Journal 1991-2004,
in a published letter to Nature
identity
 
Posts: 707
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 5:00 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The MIC controllers

Postby Harvey » Sun Nov 20, 2016 7:43 pm

Iamwhomiam » Mon Nov 21, 2016 12:42 am wrote:Harvey, that's a bad link.



I never signal sarcasm either.
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4167
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)

Re: The MIC controllers

Postby Iamwhomiam » Sun Nov 20, 2016 9:49 pm

ooh! :oops:
User avatar
Iamwhomiam
 
Posts: 6572
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 2:47 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The MIC controllers

Postby Morty » Sun Nov 20, 2016 11:01 pm

Anyone who doesn't already know, who is with it enough to ask the question, can confirm that, yes, Obama really is a low down dirty POS who has bald-faced lied to the American people and the world on a daily basis for the last 8 years. (That said, there is evidence that he dug his heels in here and there and stopped the administration and MIC crazies from running completely wild during his terms, bless him. Maybe this is his way of making amends to them for being such a stick-in-the-mud about the Syria sarin frame up and suchlike? edit: Though $12b is chump change compared to what a glorious boondoggle a full-fledged attack on Syria would have been.)

Bush Jr. broke records with the amount of debt he rang up, but Obama has made Bush Jr. look like a prudent financial manager in comparison. Now Trump comes along with a plan to increase spending (including military spending) AND drastically lower taxes, which will probably end up making Obama look like a prudent financial manager... Surely the US economy as we know it won't survive it? Surely the dollar can't last another 4 or 8 years of ringing up that kind of debt?
User avatar
Morty
 
Posts: 422
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 10:53 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: The MIC controllers

Postby identity » Sat Dec 03, 2016 2:37 am

At this site they have data sets which can be output in a range of cool graphs, displayed in innumerable ways, cross referenced, arranged however you want and then you can download the print ready artwork at any size as a bitmap or vector graphics.

For instance you arrange current or past heads of state around the world by their body count or by the amount of corporate money they've taken. You can view leading industries by their body count, who they've killed and where. You can view the most prolific serial killers by the race of their victims or their religion.You can make a top ten of the most successful liars in politics. You can see where the greenest states are in the USA, or the dirtiest. You can rank the worlds highest polluters or resource hogs. You can see where the most generous people on earth reside, or the most selfish by various measures. You can plot the consumption of raw materials against their use. You can show how many tons of steel or brass a year are used to kill human beings or how many are used to uplift them from material poverty. Wealth, murder, destruction, creation and innovation, any way you want to view the data you can.

More than all that you can view how much change can be wrought by a reallocation of resources on any scale. You can view the effectiveness of policies against real time data. You can view broken promises by governments, promises kept or you can begin begin to discover what promises have yet to be dreamt.


By no means as wide-ranging or comprehensive as what you envision above (Harvey, have you thought of crowdfunding such a delightful project?), this new book—by an landscape architect/urbanist and a geographer—from MIT Press takes a small step in that direction, focusing on the U.S. Department of Defense:

Ecologies of Power
Countermapping the Logistical Landscapes and Military Geographies of the U.S. Department of Defense
By Pierre Bélanger and Alexander Arroyo

Overview

This book is not about war, nor is it a history of war. Avoiding the shock and awe of wartime images, it explores the contemporary spatial configurations of power camouflaged in the infrastructures, environments, and scales of military operations. Instead of wartime highs, this book starts with drawdown lows, when demobilization and decommissioning morph into realignment and prepositioning. It is in this transitional milieu that the full material magnitudes and geographic entanglements of contemporary militarism are laid bare. Through this perpetual cycle of build up and breakdown, the U.S. Department of Defense—the single largest developer, landowner, equipment contractor, and energy consumer in the world—has engineered a planetary assemblage of “operational environments” in which militarized, demilitarized, and non-militarized landscapes are increasingly inextricable.

In a series of critical cartographic essays, Pierre Bélanger and Alexander Arroyo trace this footprint far beyond the battlefield, countermapping the geographies of U.S. militarism across five of the most important and embattled operational environments: the ocean, the atmosphere, the highway, the city, and the desert. From the Indian Ocean atoll of Diego Garcia to the defense-contractor archipelago around Washington, D.C.; from the A01 Highway circling Afghanistan’s high-altitude steppe to surveillance satellites pinging the planet from low-earth orbit; and from the vast cold chain conveying military perishables worldwide to the global constellation of military dumps, sinks, and scrapyards, the book unearths the logistical infrastructures and residual landscapes that render strategy spatial, militarism material, and power operational. In so doing, Bélanger and Arroyo reveal unseen ecologies of power at work in the making and unmaking of environments—operational, built, and otherwise—to come.

Endorsements

“Bélanger and Arroyo recalibrate how we understand relations of military and urban space, expertly linking disparate and often invisible logics and landscapes. A graphical masterpiece, Ecologies of Power is essential reading for anyone interested in how the world is being made.”
—Charlie Hailey, author of Camps: A Guide to 21st-Century Space

“Among its remarkable achievements, Ecologies of Power offers a new way of analyzing and representing the complex apparatus commonly called ‘war’ through its military infrastructures, logistical territories, and the material, energetic, informational, and financial flows that make and move through them. Deftly traversing a multitude of scales and landscapes, the book mobilizes a vast body of transdisciplinary work on the complex subject of power and its modes of spatial and semiotic representation. This ambitious and long-awaited volume is an essential reference for all scholars across the arts and sciences whose work aims to rethink how we engage—and disengage from—contemporary forms of conflict.”
—Claude Raffestin, author of Pour une Géographie du Pouvoir

“The urbanists and landscape thinkers of design culture prepare exceptional documents like Ecologies of Power to describe formations at a planetary scale—synthetic and correlative research translated into measured and accessible graphics that should have more and more authority to inform global decision making.”
—Keller Easterling, author of Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space
We should never forget Galileo being put before the Inquisition.
It would be even worse if we allowed scientific orthodoxy to become the Inquisition.

Richard Smith, Editor in Chief of the British Medical Journal 1991-2004,
in a published letter to Nature
identity
 
Posts: 707
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 5:00 am
Blog: View Blog (0)


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests