Belligerent Savant, my response follows both, my original posting and your response to it.
Iamwhomiam » Sat May 05, 2018 4:16 pm wrote:Belligerent Savant » Fri May 04, 2018 9:03 pmPeartreed:
Yet the same bullies who berate both AD and SLAD for their prolific posts about fascism and Trump/Russia, respectively – not respectfully – badger on relentlessly. It is tiresome and predictable and petty in the extreme
I see only direct, legitimate questions being posed to AD.
You've edited quite a bit, BS. I was hoping to be able to quote your second sentence of a now edited paragraph. However, what I quoted is proximate to it.
Why would you or anyone else waste their time to compose a slew of questions to ask someone to answer, someone who you already know has blocked your postings from their view?
And then you ask another to copy your questions and post them so AD can read them and then answer?
Belligerent Savant » Sat May 05, 2018 4:30 pm wrote:.
Iam: i'm not the only one asking questions. Others are as well.
Again, this is a discussion forum, is it not? I have questions, as do others, of the claims raised by the content (repeatedly) posted here. They remain unanswered.
If you have any objection to the questions, by all means, raise your objections. I grant you that it's a fool's errand continuing to expect a reply. A number of us continue to strive towards discourse and discussion; others clearly do not. It's part of the reason I am limiting and/or cutting myself off from this board.
My edits are to format and syntax -- I'm a harsh ctiric of my own choice of words. If you're implying something else, please share it and I'll be happy to address any concerns you may have. Otherwise dispense with the insinuation.
You've edited quite a bit, BS. I was hoping to be able to quote your second sentence of a now edited paragraph. However, what I quoted is proximate to it.
When I wrote this, I meant to keep intact the context of your response to peartreed, but in that I could not recall to reconstruct either sentence you wrote before or after, I trusted that which I quoted was accurate. You did indeed edit that sentence. And you do not contest its accuracy to the original. Thank you for your affirmation.
However, I asked you two distinct questions, neither of which you've answered! “They remain unanswered.”
Here's my first question,
"Why would you or anyone else waste their time to compose a slew of questions to ask someone to answer, someone who you already know has blocked your postings from their view?" Here's your reply to my question:
"[b]Iam: i'm not the only one asking questions. Others are as well."[/b]
I’m not asking anyone but you! “Again, this is a discussion forum, is it not?”
Allow me to ask you once again,
"Why would you or anyone else waste their time to compose a slew of questions to ask someone to answer, someone who you already know has blocked your postings from their view?" The question mark at the end of this incomplete sentence I wrote and have again quoted below should be interpreted as,
'what's up with that?' "And then you ask another to copy your questions and post them so AD can read them and then answer?"And an observation: It is sad that you felt I had some need to insinuate something that I had not at all insinuated and had never occurred to me. I asked a simple question and you should be able to simply answer it.
And before you accuse me of insinuating you’re simple, I assure you I am not.