Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
American Dream » Thu Feb 09, 2017 3:34 pm wrote:I watched a DVD of This Is What Democracy Looks Like. There is also a dramatic reenactment, available for free I think, on Netflix.
American Dream » Thu Feb 09, 2017 4:43 pm wrote:That seems kinda cold, to me. I did not go for riots, and the only kind I saw was a police riot. Everything had been planned for months as nonviolent civil disobedience- and that is all I expected.
American Dream » Thu Feb 09, 2017 5:28 pm wrote:It sounds to me like you are naturalizing and thereby justifying State Violence and Political Repression.
Do you believe in being politically active? If so, how?
American Dream » Thu Feb 09, 2017 6:14 pm wrote:I knew somebody who wanted to take a court settlement for mass police brutality at protests and use it for training in tolerance and peace-making for the cops. Problem is they were just doing their jobs as the Police Chief and Feds had set it out for them. This included indoctrination in dehumanizing the protestors as dangerous/scary terrorists with diseases to spread and arming and directing these officers to inflict pain and trauma as an integral part of their jobs.
American Dream » Thu Feb 09, 2017 6:04 pm wrote:I am often weary of protest culture- not that it is wrong, more that is not enough. Is there anything that you find more meaningful in the social sphere?
American Dream » Thu Feb 09, 2017 6:04 pm wrote:Also, don't you think there is a significant difference between those who fulfill a self-defense function for a ruling class authority that is outside and above us, for their profit and power and one that really is constituted differently? Or are you saying that political repression and state violence are forces of nature that we must submit to? I think you were against revolutions that lead to authoritarian states, which contains an important kernel of thought- should we therefore accept liberal democracy as it wages war, exploits us, jails us and commits extreme violence upon us?
Iamwhomiam » Thu Feb 09, 2017 6:39 pm wrote:American Dream » Thu Feb 09, 2017 6:14 pm wrote:I knew somebody who wanted to take a court settlement for mass police brutality at protests and use it for training in tolerance and peace-making for the cops. Problem is they were just doing their jobs as the Police Chief and Feds had set it out for them. This included indoctrination in dehumanizing the protestors as dangerous/scary terrorists with diseases to spread and arming and directing these officers to inflict pain and trauma as an integral part of their jobs.
Earlier I wanted to mention that, AD.
It has to do with soldiers being trained to disparage and dehumanize those identified as enemies, in order to make their extermination more palatable. Much easier to kill "a Zombie" than "Uncle Joe" And that's why we shouldn't allow retired soldiers become policemen. Protestors are fellow citizens, with rights equal to those of the police, and citizens who actually pay police not only their salaries and generous pensions, but for the harms police cause through their unconstitutional acts of malfeasance, and protesting citizens should never be treated as enemies of the state.
It has to do with soldiers being trained to disparage and dehumanize those identified as enemies, in order to make their extermination more palatable. Much easier to kill "a Zombie" than "Uncle Joe"
brekin » Thu Feb 09, 2017 7:08 pm wrote:
I think people who change their immediate self, or microculture, to where they are less dependent on the main culture is more meaningful to me.
A lot of the radical changes people want, they can implement themselves. But that road is hard(er).
"The ruling class" often is just whoever makes more money than you. There are people who would equate you and me as ruling class. The police protect peoples lives and properties. Not always or always efficiently, equitably, or justly. But they do. (There was a police protestor who recently got randomly shot by gang bangers in a car at a large protest and was surprised when the police he had just been vigorously antagonizing went to work saving his life.) More often now protestors try to provoke a police response to gain attention or justify their position proving abstractions (the state is fascist!). The riot police are "Symbols of State Violence and Repression" from central casting. There is a difference between Pinkerton Detectives or BlackWater and the Police. Granted, in some cities and even tiny towns the Police can often be a paid army in service to a moneyed few, but there is still the rule of law that tempers it to some varying degrees. You'd have to show how a police force could be "constituted differently" than paid law enforcement officers. Volunteer? Posse? Militia? I mean there are always trade offs.
A protest (compared to a rally, shut down, strike or insurrection) is just saying: I accept this (the system), but I really don't like this (certain manifestation of the system) and want you to temper it, change it, or hide it better.
Of course, and the police, you know "the pigs" are also disparaged and dehumanized along the same lines because...It has to do with soldiers being trained to disparage and dehumanize those identified as enemies, in order to make their extermination more palatable. Much easier to kill "a Zombie" than "Uncle Joe"
82_28 » Thu Feb 09, 2017 7:56 pm wrote:Again, WTO shit in Seattle was not caused by the pro union protesters. I have told the tale before probably many a time. They were not anarchists. They were agents. At the very least right wing agitators who were on the calling tree telling them hey come down for kick ass time framing the left for this shit, wear all black and snag your SWAT mask from the locker. As I have said, I could tell it was a right wing set up.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests