Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff
peartreed » Thu Mar 16, 2017 12:24 am wrote:I think it’s important to maintain close proximity with the shared news articles and the discussion here of their substance, rather than having to retrieve related material from stored threads or subforum sections with the same topics separately titled. In other words, let’s leave well enough alone.
Rory » Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:42 am wrote:The same freedom to proliferate dozens of spam threads across the board is the same freedom to drop in occasionally and ask politely for context and discussion. There's been no bullying, only unsubstantiated allegations of such. If you actually bothered to read, as opposed to just picking sides you might have noticed that
Definition
There is no universal definition of bullying, however, it is widely agreed upon that bullying is a subcategory of aggressive behavior characterized by the following three minimum criteria: (1) hostile intent, (2) imbalance of power, and (3) repetition over a period of time.[11] Bullying may thus be defined as the activity of repeated, aggressive behavior intended to hurt another individual, physically, mentally or emotionally.
The Norwegian researcher Dan Olweus[12] says bullying occurs when a person is "exposed, repeatedly and over time, to negative actions on the part of one or more other persons". He says negative actions occur "when a person intentionally inflicts injury or discomfort upon another person, through physical contact, through words or in other ways."[12] Individual bullying is usually characterized by a person behaving in a certain way to gain power over another person.[13]
Rory » Wed Mar 15, 2017 7:09 pm wrote:Yeah, liminalOyster. Post it in the correct, RUSSIA IS BEEN EVIL DOERS thread.
This one is specifically for RUSSIA, NOT MELISSA MEYER, BROKE YAHOO TO BITS, DARN IT ALL TO HELLRory » Wed Mar 15, 2017 12:42 pm wrote:Another RUSSIA HACKED THE FREE WORLD propaganda thread.Rory » Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:39 am wrote:Unsubstantiated, evidence free allegations. Kind of like the whole anti Russia, pro war propaganda being spread across the boardRory » Wed Mar 15, 2017 7:42 pm wrote:One topic, many threadsRory » Wed Mar 15, 2017 4:55 pm wrote:It's not cheese, it's Russian smegma.
*and the tomato "sauce" is Soviet era menses.Rory » Wed Mar 15, 2017 12:47 pm wrote:4 posts in 3 mins. I'll never keep up with your war drum propaganda at that rateRory » Wed Mar 15, 2017 12:43 pm wrote:SpamslikeamericandreamRory » Wed Mar 15, 2017 12:35 pm wrote:seemslikeadream » Wed Mar 15, 2017 9:32 am wrote:oh no Rory using nasty words now......I am in trouble now for sure
Why are you spreading anti Russian propaganda?
You want war? Why are you defending lowlifes like Louise Mensch, among many others.
JackRiddler » Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:02 am wrote:peartreed » Thu Mar 16, 2017 12:24 am wrote:I think it’s important to maintain close proximity with the shared news articles and the discussion here of their substance, rather than having to retrieve related material from stored threads or subforum sections with the same topics separately titled. In other words, let’s leave well enough alone.
If you think that, then you might want a collecting of related news articles in one or two saliently titled threads that maintain coherence and memory rather than a flood of new threads every time there is a new twist. Everything about "Russian" hacking is happening in a particular context. The "Russian" angle for example on the Yahoo e-mail penetration would not be emphasized if not for that context. Why are there separate threads on Manafort, Page and others relating to the same alleged "Russian" interference in the recent election? This has the opposite effect of what you are saying you want, it disperses "close proximity with the shared news articles." But it does look like a flood with a particular slant.
.
82_28 » Thu Mar 16, 2017 8:23 am wrote:JackRiddler » Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:02 am wrote:peartreed » Thu Mar 16, 2017 12:24 am wrote:I think it’s important to maintain close proximity with the shared news articles and the discussion here of their substance, rather than having to retrieve related material from stored threads or subforum sections with the same topics separately titled. In other words, let’s leave well enough alone.
If you think that, then you might want a collecting of related news articles in one or two saliently titled threads that maintain coherence and memory rather than a flood of new threads every time there is a new twist. Everything about "Russian" hacking is happening in a particular context. The "Russian" angle for example on the Yahoo e-mail penetration would not be emphasized if not for that context. Why are there separate threads on Manafort, Page and others relating to the same alleged "Russian" interference in the recent election? This has the opposite effect of what you are saying you want, it disperses "close proximity with the shared news articles." But it does look like a flood with a particular slant.
.
Dood. Some threads and links and shit get lost here in Tumbleweed Town. You don't wanna scan through 57 pages to find the context. SLAD starts out shit quick and easy. I may not read everything, but I don't give a shit if it is there. Point being, lay off, just out of the goodness of your hearts. It isn't a big deal.
Rory » Thu Mar 16, 2017 12:27 pm wrote:82_28 » Thu Mar 16, 2017 8:23 am wrote:JackRiddler » Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:02 am wrote:peartreed » Thu Mar 16, 2017 12:24 am wrote:I think it’s important to maintain close proximity with the shared news articles and the discussion here of their substance, rather than having to retrieve related material from stored threads or subforum sections with the same topics separately titled. In other words, let’s leave well enough alone.
If you think that, then you might want a collecting of related news articles in one or two saliently titled threads that maintain coherence and memory rather than a flood of new threads every time there is a new twist. Everything about "Russian" hacking is happening in a particular context. The "Russian" angle for example on the Yahoo e-mail penetration would not be emphasized if not for that context. Why are there separate threads on Manafort, Page and others relating to the same alleged "Russian" interference in the recent election? This has the opposite effect of what you are saying you want, it disperses "close proximity with the shared news articles." But it does look like a flood with a particular slant.
.
Dood. Some threads and links and shit get lost here in Tumbleweed Town. You don't wanna scan through 57 pages to find the context. SLAD starts out shit quick and easy. I may not read everything, but I don't give a shit if it is there. Point being, lay off, just out of the goodness of your hearts. It isn't a big deal.
Lay off? Like we're the ones in control of our actions and she's just a force of nature, to be accepted and worked around?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests