America's Garden of Dicks

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: America's Garden of Dicks

Postby seemslikeadream » Sat Nov 18, 2017 6:35 pm

Oh I understand now Fox/Faux News is pushing this crap ...using the very same words posted here :roll:

how amusing

uh that would be Faux News the employer of many sexual predators...they pay their sexual predators to make up stories about innocent people


child predators
Image



A child molester is better than a Democrat. That is straight from Breitbart

How Breitbart Is Covering the Roy Moore Accusations
By Osita Nwanevu
Alabama-Republican-US-Senate-candidate-Roy-Moore-Votes-In-States-Special-Election-To-Fill-Jeff-Sessions-Seat
Alabama Republican U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore on Sassy, leaving the Gallant Fire Hall after voting in the GOP runoff election on Sept. 26.
Hal Yeager/Getty Images

One can say at least this for Breitbart’s post Monday on the latest sexual misconduct allegation against Republican Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore: It does accurately relay the details of accuser Beverly Young Nelson’s account—that at 16, she was offered a ride home from Moore, who suddenly and violently forced her face to his crotch and dissuaded her from telling anyone. But then, the piece ends with a paragraph noting the part of the news most likely to appeal to Moore’s staunchest defenders: Nelson’s lawyer Gloria Allred, courts reporter Ian Mason concludes, has been “a prominent plaintiff’s attorney and proponent [of] left-wing social causes for decades.”

Allred also pursued a lawsuit against then-presidential candidate Donald Trump, representing three women who claimed last year that he sexually assaulted them. Around the same time the suit was filed, Allred was also serving as a delegate for Hillary Clinton at the Democratic National Convention.
What reads here as a naked and lame deflection to people unsettled by the facts of the Moore controversy—five women have accused him of making advances toward them as teens, including one who alleges a sexual assault at 14—registers as a perfectly relevant aside to Breitbart’s readers. “The presence of Gloria Allred is nothing more than PROOF THIS IS A SMEAR,” one representative comment reads. “Note these ‘accusations’ are coming out of DC and New York ... NOT IN ALABAMA, WHERE the ‘crime’ supposedly took place ... and NOT 40 YEARS AGO, WHEN the ‘crime’ supposedly took place.”

The emergence of allegations against Roy Moore to this commenter—and all others who turn to Breitbart for news about what the Democrats, or George Soros, or the Muslims, or the Hispanics are plotting (probably together)—is the swamp’s desperate swipe at the populist right’s newest rootin’, tootin’, shootin’ folk hero, a Trumpist too Trumpian for Trump and a candidate whose primary campaign Breitbart supported unreservedly. Is fondling kids a deal-breaker for a prospective senator? Not when Democratic candidate Doug Jones, an adherent of “transgender ideology,” is defending the use of restrooms by trans people who it’s presumed—baselessly, bigotedly—might fondle kids.

This has been the backdrop of everything Breitbart has published on the controversy since the website scooped the Washington Post on its Moore expose. Its initial piece on Moore’s troubles—breathlessly titled “After Endorsing Democrat in Alabama, Bezos’s Washington Post Plans to Hit Roy Moore With Allegations of Inappropriate Relations With Teenagers; Judge Claims Smear Campaign”—carried a pre-buttal from Moore calling the Post’s reporting “fake news.” That article also highlighted details that Breitbart’s Aaron Klein deemed exculpatory. Deborah Gibson, one of Moore’s accusers, “characterized Moore as being romantic, reading poetry to her, and playing the guitar,” he noted. The same day the story broke, Breitbart senior editor-at-large Joel Pollak avoided the Casanova defense in an appearance on MSNBC Live with Ali Velshi, but he nevertheless suggested that there was nothing untoward about Moore going after teenagers:

Pollak: You said yourself at the start of the segment he’s being accused of relationships with teenagers. To me that’s not accurate. In fact, it’s following in a narrative that the Post tried to set up—
Velshi: But, it is. It is teenagers. It’s a 14-year-old, a 16-year-old, and I think two 18-year-olds. They’re teenagers.
Pollak: The 16-year-old and the 18-year-old have no business in that story, because those are women of legal age of consent at the time.
“[A]s far as we know, there's only one relationship that's been alleged that's problematic,” Pollak concluded. That would be the alleged assault of then–14-year-old Leigh Corfman, the details of which Pollak elected not to expand upon.

The next day, Aaron Klein compiled Facebook posts from Gibson in an article that underlined her opposition to both Moore and President Trump, including one post featuring a video by Moore’s opponent Doug Jones and a photo of Gibson with Joe Biden, for whom she had done sign-language interpretation during a campaign appearance. “Alabama Accuser Deletes Anti-Moore Postings From Facebook,” the headline read. One might interpret Gibson’s motivation for deleting the posts as concern that her politics might distract from her story: Moore, then 34, dated her at 17 and on one occasion kissed her in his bedroom. But not Breitbart. Klein sees this as further evidence that the swamp’s residents have targeted Moore for character assassination. “At one point, in February,” Klein shudders, Gibson’s cover image on Facebook was a banner that read “Resist.”

Washington’s Republicans, Breitbart suggests, are also eager participants in the conspiracy, and are to be discredited. “Mitch McConnell Leads Establishment Republicans in Effort to Push Roy Moore Out of Alabama Race,” reads a headline atop a list of Republican senators who have called on Moore to drop out. Slightly less than half of a post about a call by “failed presidential candidate” Mitt Romney for the same is simply a description of the Obama campaign’s 2012 ad that highlighted Bain Capital’s destructive and lucrative management of GST Steel.

Breitbart’s reporting arm, to be fair, has brought a few newer bits of information to the table. It ran four “exclusives” on the controversy on Sunday, including the announcement that Moore plans to sue the Washington Post—an announcement made at an event closed to all outlets but Breitbart—and an interview with Moore’s wife, who denied the accusations against him. “At every campaign event this cycle—and Breitbart News has personally covered dozens of them in the primary, runoff, and general election—Kayla Moore has joined her husband,” Breitbart’s Matthew Boyle wrote. The subsequent sentences remind readers that the two met at Bible study and have several children and grandchildren. Boyle doesn’t say whether Moore would consider any of dating age.

The other two exclusives contain excerpts from an interview with Nancy Wells, Leigh Corfman’s mother. Wells told Breitbart that, contrary to the account given to the Post, Corfman didn’t have a phone in her bedroom and thus couldn’t have talked to Moore from it. The piece implies that this alleged inconsistency is fatal for a story that “relies heavily on Corfman’s memory and her ability to recount events consistently.” Now, if Breitbart reporters turn up evidence that Corfman has misremembered or fabricated some of the key facts of her story—that, on one occasion, Moore undressed her when she 14 years old and placed her hand on his underwear—they’ll have a real scoop indeed. Until then, they’ll have to settle for revelations like a phone being in a different room—or another tidbit from their interview with Wells: the bombshell that the Post’s reporters approached Corfman for an interview:

Corfman’s mother, Wells, told Breitbart News that reporters for the Washington Post convinced her daughter to give them an interview.
“She did not go to them,” said Wells. “They called her.”
“They tried to convince her to do it?” this reporter asked.
“Yes,” replied Wells, matter-of-factly.
Wells was asked about Corfman’s motivations for going public. “It wasn’t done for politics, you know,” Wells replied. “It was done for personal reasons. And it wouldn’t have been done if the reporters hadn’t contacted my daughter.”
Breitbart’s bewilderment at some of the basic processes of journalism is understandable. This is, after all, a publication that dedicates a considerable amount of space to lauding the activities and pronouncements of its own executive chairman Steve Bannon, who has evidently taken a break from issuing warnings about the degradation of Western values to defend an accused pedophile. A post published the day after the Post story consisted almost entirely of CBS News’ report on Bannon’s speech at a New Hampshire fundraiser, during which he dismissed the “the Bezos-Amazon-Washington Post” as a “part of the apparatus of the Democratic Party.” Another post’s headline announces, “Bannon: Republican Establishment and Media Launched a ‘Weaponized Hit on Judge Moore’ ” before what amounts to a 1,500-word transcript of an interview between Bannon and his employee, Breitbart’s Alex Marlow, in which Bannon, predictably, accuses the mainstream press of having it in for Moore. “Here’s the great thing about the internet, and places like Breitbart and others,” he says. “You can’t fool people anymore. The information can get out there. People will make their own judgment.”

“Bannon,” the post continues, “described the Breitbart News Daily model as presenting the facts and allowing the audience to form their own opinions producing a caller-driven radio show.”

The Moore story, all in all, is just another rotation in Breitbart’s perfect ouroboros of conspiratorial thinking and self-confirmation. Perhaps fortunately for Bannon and crew, Breitbart’s former tech editor Milo Yiannopoulos—who has argued 13-year-olds are capable of sexual consent—isn’t on hand to offer his thoughts; he and Bannon have had a falling out about revelations about Milo’s communications with white nationalists, which made the subtext of the site’s dog-whistling xenophobia text. Yiannopoulos’ or another writer’s provocative affirmative defense of sexually pursuing children would’ve overshadowed the message that Breitbart is more interested in pushing: This Moore story, like all stories, is ultimately about the swamp.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/ ... ldren.html




“I did try & fuck her. She was married. I moved on her like a bitch. But I couldn’t get there. I just start kissing them. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star they let you do it. You can do anything—grab them by the pussy. You can do anything.” Donald Trump #TrumpSexPredator
Last edited by seemslikeadream on Sat Nov 18, 2017 6:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: America's Garden of Dicks

Postby Rory » Sat Nov 18, 2017 6:43 pm

SmartSelectImage_2017-11-18-14-30-20.jpg


Nice ratio there, Lena

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5a10 ... 63b1aac66d

“He was flirting with me,” Perrineau said in a statement given to The Wrap. “I told him repeatedly that I was 17 years old.”

Later that night, Perrineau said, Miller assaulted her.

“At some point, I woke up in Murray’s bed naked,” Perrineau said in the statement. “He was on top of me having sexual intercourse with me. At no time did I consent to any sexual contact with Murray.”

Perrineau provided the publication with a document saying she had passed a police polygraph test. But it hasn’t been enough to convince Dunham and “Girls” showrunner Jenni Konner, who said in a statement that they stand with Miller.

“While our first instinct is to listen to every woman’s story, our insider knowledge of Murray’s situation makes us confident that sadly this accusation is one of the 3 percent of assault cases that are misreported every year,” Dunham and Konner said Friday.


SmartSelectImage_2017-11-18-14-42-13.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by Rory on Sat Nov 18, 2017 6:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Rory
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:08 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: America's Garden of Dicks

Postby seemslikeadream » Sat Nov 18, 2017 6:44 pm

child predators
Image


Image

BREITBART’S INSPIRATION

As We Rethink Old Harassers, Let’s Talk About Clarence Thomas

The old men of the Senate lectured Anita Hill from the dais, scowling as she recounted in humiliating detail how Thomas taunted her with graphic tales of pubic hair and Coke cans.

Joy-Ann Reid
JOY-ANN REID
11.17.17 9:57 PM ET
Long suppressed talk about the sexual predation of men, in Hollywood, politics, business, the news industry, professional sports and life in general has swept across the country, exposing decades of dirty laundry and putting an entire nation of men on notice and on edge.

“The discussion” in which the nation is engaged almost daily at this point, has exposed the rank hypocrisy of a right-wing “Christianity” that would sooner see a child molester stalking the well of the United States Senate than free its captive base to support a Democrat, and which still stands foursquare behind braggadocious predator-in-chief Donald Trump.

It has put on display the Republican Party’s radical lack of moral conviction as its leaders rush to condemn the gross, decade-old antics of now Sen. Al Franken, who has at least apologized for his past misbehavior, while they smirk from behind the cameras at Fox News where they are surrounded by anchor women in the required uniform of tight sweaters, mini-skirts, and four-inch heels. Among the Republicans ripping Franken for kissing a woman without her consent and snapping a juvenile “groping” picture in 2006: the great hypocrite Trump himself, of the “I just kiss beautiful women and grab ’em by the pussy” un-humble brag of 2005.

The national moment of self-reflection on the culture that produces such entitled men has compelled the left to indulge in its favorite ritual: curling into the fetal position as it self-flagellates over the eternal sins of the Clintons. It’s as if they’ve forgotten that the former president who left office 17 years ago indeed paid a price, including years of forensic investigation culminating in impeachment for his illicit affair with a 24-year-old White House intern.

Well if we are getting about the business of re-examining the past indecency of powerful men, we’d be remiss not to include the moment in 1991 when a woman was not believed and her alleged abuser was elevated to the highest court in the land, where he remains 26 years later.

The late Andrew Breitbart, who took down Democratic congressman Anthony Weiner by having his minions troll Weiner’s Twitter account in search of his vices, and having found them, waved the lurid visual evidence before the world, once said he was inspired to become a conservative because of Clarence Thomas, whom he viewed as a persecuted man. Breitbart cloaked his savage politics in alleged concern for a beleaguered black man, saying of Thomas’ critics: “[t]hese white, privileged men knew that by taking this conservative, religious man and asking him if he rented pornography, the mere exposure of that would hurt… I was so pissed off. You guys are just trying to ruin him. You don’t have anything.”


Not anything, that is, except the word of Anita Hill, an African-American woman who risked national humiliation and ruin to publicly tell her story of repeated sexual harassment at the hands of Thomas, her onetime boss at the U.S. Department of Education and the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission.

Republican Senators Host Trump and Whiff
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer speaks to journalists on Nov. 1, 2017.
Schumer Wants Mandatory Sexual Harassment Training on Hill
It’s hard to see Thomas, who wrote off his Yale degree as worthless because of affirmative action yet retreated to the language of “lynching” to disparage his accuser and her supporters, as much of a victim. Particularly when most Americans, and most African Americans, took his side against Anita Hill and against prominent civil rights and women’s rights organizations who were unanimous in their opposition to his elevation to the seat once occupied by the great Thurgood Marshall. Democrats including then-Sen. Joe Biden, took Thomas’ side against Hill, too—even refusing to allow witnesses who could corroborate her account to testify at Thomas’ Supreme Court confirmation hearings.

Instead, we were treated to a bipartisan spectacle of the old men of the United States Senate lecturing Professor Hill from the dais; scowling at her as she was forced to recount in mortifying detail how Thomas pushed her to date him and taunted her with disgusting jokes and insinuations at work that included graphic tales of pubic hair and Coke cans.

Again, most Americans chose not to believe Hill, who was castigated as a liar, a temptress, and a race-traitor trying to keep a black man off the Supreme Court. Never mind that the American Bar Association had delivered a mixed verdict on whether he was even qualified for a lifetime appointment of such grandeur. I can personally recall knock-down, drag out arguments with black colleagues and relatives who were defending Thomas, and demanding a West Indian gypsy cab driver in the Bronx pull over and let me out of his car after he called Hill a whore.

Having been placed on the court anyway, Thomas became the silent justice; voting in lockstep with the late Antonin Scalia and authoring precious little worth remembering for posterity save for his serial attacks on labor rights, women’s rights and the voting rights of fellow African Americans. Needless to say, many black men and women who sided with Thomas against Anita Hill soon came to bitterly regret it.

When Weiner’s political career went up in flames, he was in the midst of exposing Justice Thomas with regular rants on the House floor for his ostentatious habit of consorting with major Republican donors who might have business before his court, often with Scalia at his side.

Thomas’ chummy ways with the rich and well-heeled, and his wife’s clear conflicts of interest as a paid crusader against Obamacare despite it coming imminently before the court, presaged the age of corruption we find ourselves in today, with Donald Trump and his extended family of kakistocrats blundering their way around Washington and the world’s capitols in search of grubby gain. In many ways, the banality with which Americans dismissed Thomas’ alleged sexual misconduct, his disparagement of his victim, and his ethical flexibility were a portent of the Trump era to come.

And like Trump, and unlike Bill Clinton, Thomas sits in power still; with the authority to make life and death decisions over the fate of those facing capital punishment, those needing health care, and most ironically, over the rights and liberties of women.

As happened with Trump, Thomas’ elevation despite the shocking allegations against him ignited women to action. In 1992, a record number of women ran for federal office, increasing the number of female United States senators from just two to six, prompting the media to declare it “the year of the woman.” Among those newly elected senators was Barbara Boxer, who as a House member had helped lead a march with six of her female colleagues to the Senate to demand that Hill’s allegations against Thomas be taken seriously and that his confirmation be delayed.

Ironically, the wave of elected women, including the first black woman senator, Carole Mosely Braun, in 1992 helped carry Bill Clinton, himself accused of sexual indiscretions and misconduct as governor of Arkansas, into the White House. When Bill Bennett and the self-righteous, self-appointed “moral majority” in the conservative movement announced the “death of outrage” after Clinton failed to be taken down by his affair with Monica Lewinsky, they perhaps forgot that outrage died first with the shaming and dismissal of Anita Hill.

Or maybe they didn’t forget because they never really cared. Who, after all, was Anita Hill to them but some black woman trying to keep a “good, conservative Christian” off the high court. It’s an echo of today’s advent of rank hypocrisy, when Roy Moore’s accusers are accused of trying to keep a “good, conservative Christian” out of the Senate. Or when the right wing furrows its collective brow at the predatory men of Hollywood—discarded by Democrats without a second thought—while they vow to die on the desiccated moral hill of Donald J. Trump.

Indeed, we need to continue to talk about predacious men. That needs to include the sexual raptors armed with immense power right now—beginning with the president of the United States and the high court’s scandalized associate justice, Clarence Thomas.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/as-we-ret ... nce-thomas




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eS61jpSQyIc
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: America's Garden of Dicks

Postby Rory » Sat Nov 18, 2017 7:22 pm

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-m ... y,amp.html


The West Hollywood apartment of a prominent Democratic donor where a 26-year-old man was found dead of an overdose this summer was littered with drug paraphernalia, according to the man’s autopsy report.

The Los Angeles County coroner’s report, which was obtained by the Los Angeles Times on Friday, says that Gemmel Moore died from an accidental methamphetamine overdose July 27 in the Laurel Avenue home of Ed Buck. The drug was injected into his body.

Paramedics found Moore naked on a mattress in the living room with a “male pornography movie playing on the television,” the report states.

Coroner's officials ruled Moore's death an accident, and an initial review by sheriff's deputies found nothing suspicious. In August, Los Angeles County sheriff’s homicide detectives launched a new investigation after Moore’s mother and friends questioned whether the drugs that killed him were self-administered.

Capt. Chris Bergner of the sheriff’s homicide bureau said witnesses are still being interviewed and that it remains an “active investigation.”

No charges have been filed.

Moore's mother, LaTisha Nixon of Texas, has questioned whether Buck's ties to elected officials and differences in race and class influenced the investigation.

Buck, who is 63 and white, is a longtime political donor, one-time West Hollywood City Council candidate and a well-known figure in LGBTQ political circles. Moore, who was black, had been homeless and had worked as an escort.

Buck’s attorney, Seymour Amster, says his client was a friend of Moore’s who did nothing wrong and that the methamphetamine was self-administered. After reviewing the autopsy report, Amster said he maintained his position that Buck “did not witness it being injected.”

“I think it’s time to bring this tragedy to a conclusion,” Amster said. “This was an accidental death. This was an unfortunate death … but that doesn’t mean we can make spurious accusations and spin something out of control.”

Moore had flown from Houston to Los Angeles the day he died, according to coroner’s investigators. His mother has told The Times that Buck bought his airplane ticket.

A notebook found in his property indicated using drugs in the past with someone whose name is redacted in the coroner’s report. The Times has reviewed pages of a journal that authorities said was found among Moore’s possessions. In it, Moore purportedly wrote last year about using crystal methamphetamine.

"Ed Buck is the one to thank,” Moore appears to have written. “He gave me my first injection of chrystal [sic] meth."

The Times interviewed a man who said he reported complaints about Buck — similar to those made in the journal — to the sheriff's West Hollywood station on July 4. The man, who asked to remain anonymous, described himself as an escort. The Sheriff's Department was looking into whether he filed a report.

The coroner’s report says that, about 6:45 p.m., Moore was visiting “his friend’s residence” and “was witnessed by his friend” becoming warm and unresponsive after using methamphetamine injected about 5 p.m. The male friend’s name is redacted.

The friend alerted a neighbor who “has medical knowledge” and attempted CPR until a paramedic arrived. The report says Buck called 911.

The coroner’s report says police found sex toys, syringes and “clear plastic bags with suspected methamphetamine in a tool box roll-cabinet in the living room.”

Police indicated that someone at the scene “is suspected to be known to exchange drugs for sex,” the report states. The name is redacted.

The report says that coroner’s investigators interviewed a woman, whose name is redacted, who said Moore told her that someone whose name is also redacted tied him up “over a year ago” and “held him against his will at the residence in West Hollywood.”

The report indicates that an investigator spoke with Moore’s mother.

According to the report, a coroner’s investigator found the following items in Buck’s two-bedroom apartment: 24 syringes with brown residue, five glass pipes with white residue and burn marks, a plastic straw with possible white residue, clear plastic bags with white powdery residue and a clear plastic bag with a “piece of crystal-like substance.”

Bergner said potential witnesses have been given some immunity from prosecution from other possible crimes in order to provide statements to his detectives. Investigators have spoken to several witnesses and are working to corroborate their statements, which takes time, he said.

Bergner cautioned that though medical evidence in a coroner’s report is conclusive, the investigative narrative is based on initial information and can change as a more thorough investigation is conducted.

Amster said the coroner’s ruling of Moore’s death as accidental should have settled the matter.

“I think this concludes it,” he said of the autopsy. “The manner of death is accident. This whole thing is about ‘how did Gemmel Moore die?’ It was a tragedy. It certainly is a strong statement to say no to drugs.”
Rory
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:08 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: America's Garden of Dicks

Postby seemslikeadream » Sat Nov 18, 2017 7:30 pm

a random meth head democratic donor who was black, had been homeless and had worked as an escort drops dead! :P

you should start a whole new thread on that guy..I think you are on to something now...email Fox

are you really having that hard of a time finding Democrats...slandering Biden and now this? :thumbsup
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: America's Garden of Dicks

Postby Rory » Sat Nov 18, 2017 7:45 pm

http://www.jasmyneacannick.com/after-ge ... s-of-hell/

The Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department is taking a first look at the July 27 death of Gemmel Moore. I said first look, rather second or closer look, because Moore, 26, was a Black gay male escort who was found dead on July 27 in prominent Democratic donor Ed Buck’s West Hollywood apartment. Buck is white and so the cause of death was immediately explained away and classified as an accidental meth overdose by the Los Angeles County Coroner. It was only when excerpts from Moore’s personal journal were published as well as various accounts from additional victims did the sheriff’s department decide–albeit weeks too late and most likely after any and all evidence is Buck’s apartment has been removed–to reexamine his death.

In his journal, Moore wrote, “I honestly don’t know what to do. I’ve become addicted to drugs and the worst one at that,” a December entry reads. “Ed Buck is the one to thank. He gave me my first injection of crystal meth it was very painful, but after all the troubles, I became addicted to the pain and fetish/fantasy.”

His last entry, dated Dec. 3, 2016 reads: “If it didn’t hurt so bad, I’d kill myself but I’ll let Ed Buck do it for now.”

But Moore isn’t alone. As news of Moore’s death spreads through Los Angeles, more and more young Black men are stepping forward out of the shadows to share their Ed Buck story painting a very disturbing pattern.

This is Blake’s story. Blake has “receipts” and his name has been changed to protect his identity.

Blake’s Story

Ed Buck’s name was first brought to Blake’s attention while in jail on a short stint for fraud.

“I ended up getting arrested and going to jail for fraud around 2014. Somebody told me about Ed Buck. Just randomly. ‘Oh he’d be good for you.’ And I’m like okay what’s that supposed to mean? I’m thinking they’re just being messy and they were like, ‘No, you’re going to meet him. I bet you meet him.’ I know the person from Hollywood– you know like being around Santa Monica [Boulevard].”

It wasn’t too much later that Blake said he had a chance meeting with who turned out to be Ed Buck on Santa Monica Boulevard near a porn store.

“Meeting Buck–I met him like just walking Santa Monica [Boulevard]. Like cause I was actually trying to sell dope or do whatever–sell drugs to do what I had to do you know to keep that room. I didn’t care.”

“It was like a little porno place,” he continues. “A little place. A movie little porno place and he walked up and you know he’s checking and he’s looking. Checked me out. Got in his car. And he was real like suspicious and you could tell he was like intoxicated. Cause I knew he would be a for sure. I didn’t know his name was Ed Buck. I didn’t know that was him.”

Blake who is 30-years-old, says that on his first meeting with the wealthy LA Democratic donor they sat in his car negotiating. He says that Buck asked him if he did crystal meth and was interested in “PnP.”

“PnP” is short for Party n’ Play among gay men. “Party” refers to drug use- most often meth and “Play” refers to sex.

Blake says that he told Buck that he’d tried smoking meth a year before he met him but had never used needles.

“I tried it [smoking crystal meth] and then I stopped. Because I just tried it that day and I was gone for like a weekend in my mind to me. So I was like okay I can’t do that. I can’t smoke that no more. I can say no. I can say no. With Buck I started again.”

Blake would go on to say that it was that chance encounter with Ed Buck that started him down the road of a crystal meth addiction. When asked about his first time with Buck and if it included doing meth Blake emphatically replied, “Oh hell yeah that’s the main thing. There’s no sex involved. That’s why I liked it.”

And by like, he made it clear he meant the prices. What Ed Buck agreed to. He didn’t have to have sex.

When reflecting on what Ed Buck would pay him Blake’s mood changes instantly and he starts to look around the sparsely crowded restaurant we’re sitting in.

“I don’t want nobody to hear us.”

I reassure him that no one is paying any attention to us and that the music playing in the restaurant would ensure that our conversation was private.

When we return back to the topic of payment, appearing to be hurt, Blake looks down at his food and says that he heard now that he was getting less money from Ed Buck than others.

“And it was kind of bothering me cause I’m like you have all this money that you’re giving to dogs and fur and Hillary [Clinton] and all the other stuff.”

Ed Buck is a longtime animal rights activist and contributor to Democratic causes and candidates. In 2015, Buck donated $2,700 to Hillary Clinton’s campaign for president and another $2,500 in 2016. He had a reputation for making generous donations to the California and L.A. County Democratic Party and served as chair of Stonewall Democratic Club’s Political Affairs Committee.



“When you [Buck] out here getting these Black kids–Black only kids–off the street that are out there trying–because they have nowhere else to go so they are willing to do whatever so they can survive.”

Blake says his first time with Ed Buck he was offered $300 for three hours.

When I asked him what Buck wanted to do he replied, “Smoke and smoke and smoke and smoke and smoke and smoke.”

September 7, 2014 text message from Ed Buck to Blake.



“And he want to smoke too and he wants to shoot up and he wants to do shots inside your penis so you can stay hard,” explained Blake. “He give you Viagras. Oh you had to do these things. This was like a part of it. You had to take two Viagras cause it makes your heart go fast. Um, a Cialis. Um, but you had to be smoking. You had to be getting steadily high. That was it period. Oh yeah–and show off–take off your clothes and put on certain underwears. He had a very big underwear fetish. And it was kind of nasty because I don’t know which one–who wore this and who wore that and because there was so much traffic over there. I was like eww, um I need new stuff. I don’t know what you thought this was. I don’t know what’s going on. You got clothes all over the floor in the living room. You got the door barricaded so nobody can get in. You chained up the kitchen.”

Ed Buck sits on his couch in his apartment while watching one of his victims model white underwear. Click photo to enlarge.



Blake confirms other victims account of Ed Buck owning a red Craftsman toolbox. He says that, “The red toolbox is where everything is at.”

When asked what he meant by everything Blake replied, “The drugs.”

Heroine? “Yep.”

Cocaine. “Yep.”

Meth? “Yep.”

Weed? “Yep.”

Pipes, needles? “All of that.” Everything you needed. Anything you do.”

“Like you had to be really strong. Then he had, when you walked in, this red light–I think I gave you a picture with the wife beater on with the red light in the background. He calls that the gates of hell.”

Blake standing in front of Ed Buck’s “gates of hell.” Click photo to enlarge.



Blake’s attitude immediately changes when he begins explaining how Ed Buck would often call him a nigger.

Imitating Buck’s voice Blake said, “My nigger buddy. My straight nigger buddy”

“Bitch what did you just call me? I said, ‘What’d you just say? Watch your mouth.’”

Back in his impression of Buck, Blake said, “This is my house. I do what I want.”

“Very irate, like he’s very hostile. His voice–like he has Tourette’s or something.

Blake, who has been dealing with Buck off and on since 2014 all the way up to as recently as July 2 of this year says that Buck gets too high.

“I sent him a message on my Apple watch describing what it means to be too high because I just wanted him to understand he gets too high he gets way too high. He be up for days.”

Blake says that Buck has friends to come over and shoot meth into his neck for him.

“He has friends come over and shoot him up in his neck.”

Blake talked about Buck’s friend Steve who lives in the same apartment building.

“That’s his [Buck’s] buddy. Every time there’s an issue or a problem with the cops he always running to Steve. I heard that he’s not fond of me.”

On at least one occasion Blake recalls going with Ed Buck to downtown Los Angeles to pick up other Black men.

“That’s the ones that wanted to do crack and I don’t do that at all.”

He continued, “It was downtown area like Alvarado near the park. Girl he go down there and see if there’s any Black guys over there. Then he go downtown–cross downtown. He went to Skid Row. He already knew this one dude that he call his ‘crack baby.’ And I’m like okay yeah this is crazy. And he riding around looking for his friend and he found him eventually so he can get some more stuff. And I’m like damn I don’t want to be out here. I’ve been smoking but we end up picking him up, dropping somebody else off and basically I was like put out the picture really. Cause I wasn’t smoking or nothing. I was just ready to go.”

Like another victim of Ed Buck’s recounted, Blake says that Buck injected him with meth.

“My arm was red. When I woke up I thought he was doing that too me. But the other dude was over there high too so I didn’t know what was going on. It wasn’t really painful but like the whole day though I was like what’s wrong with my arm? Why is it not–it’s not working. It’s–it’s tripping. And I was like that for like–I just laid in the bed and went through this little episode sweating at night and didn’t know what was going on so I went to the ambulance–called the ambulance. Come pick me up.”

Blake’s says the ambulance picked him up from the now closed Grand Motel in the Pico/Robertson area and took him to Cedars-Sinai hospital where he said Ed Buck came to visit him.

“He called my phone and I was there. ‘Hey what’s up I’m in the hospital. I think it’s because of something that you gave me.’”

In his impression of Ed Buck Blake said Buck replied, “I’m gonna come to see you. Are you sure?”

The second time he says Buck injected him with crystal meth he said Buck offered him some money to do it and Blake’s admits he agreed to it.

“I was fine that time. I was really at a low point. I was living from motel to motel. Getting kicked out. Staying with trannies. I didn’t have to stay there [Buck’s apartment] that long as long as I shoot up with meth. I took the deal.”

Blake says he was paid $500 by Buck to shoot meth.

“And that money went so fast cause I was high.”

Blake says that on more than one occasion the police were called.

“I was in front of his house and I wouldn’t leave,” said Blake. “And so then the cop took me down the hill to 7-Eleven cause I tried to explain to him what was going on cause he [Buck] had all my stuff inside of his garage. I had left some stuff there because I couldn’t pay for my hotel room.”

Blake says he asked Buck for money to pay for a motel and Buck said rather than do that Blake could just come to his apartment and get money for doing drugs with him. Blake says Buck put his bags in his carport but then told him he had to leave because he forgot he had a masseuse coming over and to come back in an hour.

Blake said that he went to Starbucks.

“I was just trying not to be walking on Santa Monica Boulevard like a prostitute.”

After three hours Blake went back.

Blake continued, “So I went back to the place and acted a fool because he wouldn’t let me come up at all. He wouldn’t let me get my stuff. He wouldn’t come out. Matter of fact–he sent some boy out to tell me to move or he gone beat me up. It was like crazy. He had somebody else over there too. And I was like ‘Dog, my stuff is inside your garage. Just let me get my stuff.’ So he called the cops. He actually left the place through the garage and I’m in front at his door at the front gate where you walk in. So I see his car just drive by. A grey Accura. Old car. Like 2004 or something. And I’m just like, really? I call him, no answer. I keep calling, no answer. So eventually I just got the hint. All of a sudden the cops–I was just sitting right there like I’m getting my stuff. My laptop’s in there for school so I’m gonna get my stuff. Cops came. I had some stuff [drugs] on me. I got arrested.”

Blake says that he never went to the police about anything Ed Buck did to him.

“I was homeless and I needed the money. At times I felt that he was the only–like he was a reliable client. But he always–we always argued. We always fought. I never got the money that he promised me. He ordered me materials that I needed for school and I can’t even afford to go school. I’m over there like trying to hustle up money to go to school. He was really mean. A mean person.”

Blake says that Buck would call him “nigger” and “Black boy” and make him wear leather and dirty clothes.


He said the minute you get there Buck wants you to start smoking.

“Then he gives you different things he wasn’t to see you in. Then I get bored and be like a take a picture or something I’m tired of looking at these pornos. I’m just tired. I’m ready to go home. Um, turn the light off. Cause he has the light full blasting. Can’t listen to no music. Can’t do nothing like to come down. He give you Gatorade. Yeah. He’s a vegan so that’s the only food he has in his house. So you had to eat the vegan food if you was hungry which nobody would do because I don’t know what kind of diet that is. He had Gatorade and popsicles. I guess that was helping us.”

“I was there for 8 hours before and only got $100. He promised me he’d help me with my tuition for school. He’d help me get my phone.”

Blake on several times says Buck didn’t pay him or give him the money they agreed to.

“He injected me with steroids–I think it was steroids. Just so I could grow weight. He said I was getting too skinny.”

Blake says that while he was asleep Ed Buck would put cockrings on him.

Cockrings are rings worn around the penis, usually at the base. According to Wikipedia, the primary purpose of wearing a cock ring is to restrict the flow of blood from the erect penis in order to produce a stronger erection or to maintain an erection for a longer period of time.

“Oh yeah he likes to tie our balls when we passed out or something with cockrings. Big ole’ cockrings. Black little–I don’t want that on my thing thing. Like who else been wearing it?”

Blake provided numerous photos of himself inside of Ed Buck’s apartment. In one photo Ed Buck appears to be blowing smoke while seated next to Blake.

Explaining to me about the photo Blake says, “Okay this is the last time I was over there. I just can’t take it no more. You see I put on full clothes. He wanted me to dress up so I put on some fucking boots that he wanted me to wear. Those are my underwear. The thermos, those are his. Um, and I’m looking at my phone really and he’s nosy so he wants to look at my phone as well and see what I’m doing and why I’m not paying attention to him.”

Blake says that in the photo in Buck’s hand is a torch that Buck was using light a pipe with meth.

“He’s smoking it in my direction so that I can pay attention to him.”

Blake continued, “He has a skin disease. So like when you see his skin he has like patches on his body. And you be like ewww and then he wear so much cockrings on his thing thing…He got bumps and shit. Nobody touches–there’s no sex involved really more or less. No sex but just you still got to watch the porn with him. You still got to get high. I mean getting high. That’s it. I’m serious. Taking pictures. He even watch you while you’re taking a dump. Stupid shit. Like that’s how–that’s how paranoid he is.”

Blake gets emotional as he thinks about the past several year’s he’s spent with Buck.

“He has a lot of money. He has so much money. And only gives me a hundred, 300 hundred and I be there for the longest. Like, I don’t understand. I really, really don’t understand it. He has choked me. He has kept my stuff hostage. And we went out to eat and he was mad cause I didn’t want to go shopping for underwear cause I’m tired of wearing the same shit. If you gone take me shopping take me shopping where I want. Clothes I would like. Not buying white underwear. Got mad and made this big ole scene in front of the security and he had my bag in his car and would not–refused–to give me my bag.”

I asked Blake to expand on Buck choking him.

“I wouldn’t leave his house and he choked me so he could get me out of his house. And when he choked me, I just left.”

Blake says that Buck would always put him out while he was high.

“So you when you walking down Hollywood or Santa Monica fucking Boulevard–sorry–you’ll get caught up by the cops and they mess with you badly–especially when they have sweeps.”

Blake says that before he would leave Buck’s house that he would strip search him and it was humiliating. He questioned whether he was the only one that Buck did that too.

Today Blake is trying to get his life together. Besides working on his mental and physical health, Blake has hopes of returning to college and studying music. He says that he hasn’t seen Ed Buck in over a month and is devastated about the news of Gemmel Moore’s death in Buck’s apartment and was convinced by his friends to come forward and share his story after hearing Buck’s attorney Seymour Amster portray his client as a “good friend” of Moore’s and a “kindhearted” man who helps troubled young men.

“And he lies to you and tell you like–oh I don’t know what– in the article, oh Gemmel um, was in the room when he did what he was doing so he doesn’t know. Buck doesn’t know. No nigga–you knew what Gemmel what was doing. You was doing it to him because obviously you were in the same room. You not gonna take your eye off the person. That’s not you so stop lying. You have the mirrors set up so that you can see what’s going on while you even in the bathroom you can still look through the mirrors and see what’s going on. That’s why you placed the mirrors like that.”

Blake’s friends read about the death of Gemmel Moore and contacted me regarding their friend because they knew that he had been involved with Buck.

“Blake came from a good family,” said Ted. “He had good friends. Although he may have chosen that life that doesn’t give Ed Buck the right to take advantage of Blake. Ed Buck is taking the weakest people and injecting them with God knows what and kicking out them back on the street. That’s not good for them and it’s not good for the community.”

Currently Ed Buck has not been charged with a crime. Currently.

Meanwhile, if I’m Ed Buck’s neighbor and I see some unsuspecting young Black man going up to his apartment–this is me right about now.

Rory
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:08 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: America's Garden of Dicks

Postby seemslikeadream » Sat Nov 18, 2017 9:56 pm

THE RIGHT WING
Tony Perkins Knew a GOP Lawmaker Sexually Assaulted a Teen—But He Kept Quiet, Emails Reveal
A Washington Post report reveals the emails showing what the head of the Evangelical Family Research Council knew.
By Tom Boggioni / Raw Story November 18, 2017, 8:03 AM GMT

According to a report from the Washington Post, the head of the evangelical Family Research Council was alerted that a Ohio lawmaker sexually assaulted a teen in a hotel room over two years ago and never made the information public.

The report states that the Post obtained internal emails showing that Tony Perkins, in his capacity as the president of the Council for National Policy, was made aware that 31-year-old Wesley Goodman had fondled an 18-year-old college student following an event at the Ritz Carlton in Washington D.C.

Goodman, a Christian “family values” Republican lawmaker stepped down from his post under pressure two days ago after it was revealed that he had engaged in a same-sex tryst on his Ohio office.

According to the report, following the hotel incident two years ago, Perkins was told what had happened by the teen’s stepfather, who wrote to the family values advocate, stating, “If we endorse these types of individuals, then it would seem our whole weekend together was nothing more than a charade.”

In response, Perkins wrote back, ““Trust me . . . this will not be ignored nor swept aside…It will be dealt with swiftly, but with prudence.”

Writing to Goodman in 2015, Perkins told the young lawmaker, “Going forward so soon, without some distance from your past behavior and a track record of recovery, carries great risk for you and for those who are supporting you,”

The report states that Perkins privately asked Goodman to drop out of the race and suspended him from the council, however Goodman continued on with his campaign and was elected in 2016, without Perkins ever going public about what he had learned.

According to emails acquired by the Post, Perkins did inform board members of the tax-exempt 501(c)3 group founded in the early 1980s, but otherwise kept it a secret which has angered one conservative group in Ohio.

“We are so sick of people knowing and doing nothing. If someone knew, they had an obligation to say something. That’s what you do. That’s how you hold society together,” explained Thomas R. Zawistowski, president of Ohio Citizens PAC, which endorsed Goodman.

The Washington Post has reported that Perkins has not responded to requests for a comment.
https://www.alternet.org/right-wing/ema ... t-it-quiet


NEWS & POLITICS
Gene Simmons Banned from Fox News for Life After Harassing Female Staffers

The Kiss frontman reportedly burst into a staff meeting and exposed his chest.
By Chris Sosa / AlterNet November 16, 2017, 6:29 PM GMT

Gene Simmons of Kiss fame has been a regular presence on Fox News and Fox Business Network. But all that changed after he had an aggressive, sexist meltdown in the building.

The day started to go poorly when Simmons appeared to minimize the allegations against Harvey Weinstein on Fox and Friends.

“Okay, I’m a powerful and attractive man, and what I’m about to say is deadly serious,” he said. “Men are jackasses. From the time we’re young we have testosterone. I’m not validating it or defending it.”

But what happened after the cameras stopped rolling is scary. Simmons reportedly went up to the 14th floor to do a book plug for the FoxNews.com entertainment section. Then, per the Daily Beast, he inexplicably burst into a staff meeting and the following scene ensued:

“'Hey chicks, sue me!' he shouted, and then pulled open his red velvet shirt to reveal his chest and belly, according to the source. Then he starting telling Michael Jackson pedophilia jokes, and then bopped two employees on the head with his book, making derisive comments about their comparative intelligence according to the sound their heads made when struck."

He was subsequently banned for life from both the premises and from appearing on Fox News or Fox Business Network programming.
https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-polit ... e-staffers
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: America's Garden of Dicks

Postby Rory » Sun Nov 19, 2017 12:05 am

SmartSelectImage_2017-11-18-20-03-28.jpg


LMAO - that ratio. Her apologies make it worse
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Rory
 
Posts: 1596
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 2:08 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: America's Garden of Dicks

Postby Cordelia » Mon Nov 20, 2017 2:51 pm

Why sexual harassment discussions include lawmakers talking about Bill Clinton’s past

By Julia Manchester - 11/19/17 03:20 PM EST

Renewed controversy over sexual harassment in politics has forced Democrats to reflect on how the party handled previous accusations of sexual misconduct against former President Clinton.

President Trump's opponents have renewed calls amid the nationwide discussion for action on past accusations against the president.

But the controversy has also forced introspection by some within the Democratic Party, who are calling for reform and looking back at their own past on the issue.

Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.), who led the charge on combatting sexual misconduct on Capitol Hill, said Sunday that women who made sexual misconduct allegations against Clinton were not treated fairly.

“They should have been believed, because, as I pointed out, most people who come forward are telling the truth,” Speier told CBS’s “Face the Nation."


The Sunday comments come as a slew of women across the country, from Hollywood to Capitol Hill, have come forward to accuse various high-profile men of sexual misconduct, igniting a national conversation on the issue.

The White House has argued that Trump already addressed accusations against him by denying them during the campaign. Trump did not hesitate to criticize Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) after allegations surfaced against him, but has held his fire against GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore.

“For every Republican who has behaved badly, there's a Democrat who has behaved badly,” former Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina acknowledged Sunday on ABC.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) made headlines last week when she said during an interview with The New York Times that Clinton should have resigned following allegations that he carried on an affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky while he was president.

“I think that is the appropriate response,” Gillibrand told the publication.

“I think under those circumstances there should be a very different reaction,” she continued. “And I think in light of this conversation, we should have a very different conversation about President Trump, and a very different conversation about allegations against him.”

But Neera Tanden, who served as a policy director for both Clinton and former President Obama and now serves as president of the liberal Center for American Progress, argued on Sunday that Clinton "faced a lot more punishment than the current president" following sexual harassment claims.

Speier and others who served in the Clinton administration, such as former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, similarly said that Clinton's impeachment represents serious consequences for his actions.

"If you're going to look at people ... we can look 20 years ago at a former president [or] we can look in the last decade at a current president," Tanden argued on CNN.

Continued.......
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing- ... ack-in-the


The difference twenty years can make; from respected apologist advocate Gloria Steinem's 1998 New York Times op-ed:
" Feminists and the Clinton Question"

In her original story, Paula Jones essentially said the same thing. She went to then-Governor Clinton's hotel room, where she said he asked her to perform oral sex and even dropped his trousers. She refused, and even she claims that he said something like, ''Well, I don't want to make you do anything you don't want to do.”

Her lawyers now allege that as a result of the incident Ms. Jones described, she was slighted in her job as a state clerical employee and even suffered long-lasting psychological damage. But there appears to be little evidence to support those accusations. As with the allegations in Ms. Willey's case, Mr. Clinton seems to have made a clumsy sexual pass, then accepted rejection.

https://www.scribd.com/document/3366034 ... York-Times


"I don't think at this moment our goal is to look back 20 years or 30 years," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said Sunday on CNN.


(Or 40, when he wrote his infamous ‘Rape Fantasy’ essay..... :roll: )
The greatest sin is to be unconscious. ~ Carl Jung

We may not choose the parameters of our destiny. But we give it its content. ~ Dag Hammarskjold 'Waymarks'
User avatar
Cordelia
 
Posts: 3697
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: America's Garden of Dicks

Postby liminalOyster » Mon Nov 20, 2017 3:04 pm

"I don't think at this moment our goal is to look back 20 years or 30 years," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said Sunday on CNN.


(Or 40, when he wrote his infamous ‘Rape Fantasy’ essay..... :roll: )


Bad over-reaching and dated essay but hardly any kind of rape apologia IMHO.


A man goes home and masturbates his typical fantasy. A woman on her knees, a woman tied up, a woman abused.

A woman enjoys intercourse with her man — as she fantasizes being raped by 3 men simultaneously.

The man and woman get dressed up on Sunday — and go to Church, or maybe to their "revolutionary" political meeting.

Have you ever looked at the Stag, Man, Hero, Tough magazines on the shelf of your local bookstore? Do you know why the newspaper with the articles like "Girl 12 raped by 14 men" sell so well? To what in us are they appealing?

Women, for their own preservation, are trying to pull themselves together. And it's necessary for all of humanity that they do so. Slavishness on one hand breeds pigness on the other hand. Pigness on one hand breeds slavishness on the other. Men and women — both are losers. Women adapt themselves to fill the needs of men, and men adapt themselves to fill the needs of women. In the beginning there were strong men who killed the animals and brought home the food — and the dependent women who cooked it. No More! Only the roles remain — waiting to be shaken off. There are no "human" oppressors. Oppressors have lost their humanity. On one hand "slavishness," on the other hand "pigness." Six of one, half dozen of the other. Who wins?

Many women seem to be walking a tightrope now. Their qualities of love, openness, and gentleness were too deeply enmeshed with qualities of dependency, subservience, and masochism. How do you love — without being dependent? How do you be gentle — without being subservient? How do you maintain a relationship without giving up your identity and without getting strung out? How do you reach out and give your heart to your lover, but maintain the soul which is you?

And Men. Men are in pain too. They are thinking, wondering. What is it they want from a woman? Are they at fault? Are they perpetrating this man-woman situation? Are they oppressors?

The man is bitter.

"You lied to me," he said. (She did).

"You said that you loved me, that you wanted me, that you needed me. Those are your words." (They are).

"But in reality," he said, "If you ever loved me, or wanted me, or needed me (all of which I'm not certain was ever true), you also hated me. You hated me — just as you have hated every man in your entire life, but you didn't have the guts to tell me that. You hated me before you ever saw me, even though I was not your father, or your teacher, or your sex friend when you were 13 years old, or your husband. You hated me not because of who I am, or what I was to you, but because I am a man. You did not deal with me as a person — as me. You lived a lie with me, used me and played games with me — and that's a piggy thing to do."

And she said, "You wanted me not as a woman, or a lover, or a friend, but as a submissive woman, or submissive friend, or submissive lover; and right now where my head is I balk at even the slightest suspicion of that kind of demand."

And he said, "You're full of _______."

And they never again made love together (which they had each liked to do more than anything) or never ever saw each other one more time.
[/quote]
"It's not rocket surgery." - Elvis
User avatar
liminalOyster
 
Posts: 1873
Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 10:28 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: America's Garden of Dicks

Postby Cordelia » Mon Nov 20, 2017 7:19 pm

No big surprise (for many, no big a deal):

Second woman accuses Franken of inappropriate touching

Image

By Ed O'Keefe November 20 at 5:24 PM

Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) on Monday faced new allegations of inappropriately touching women, but there are no signs he plans to step down amid the swirl of controversy now surrounding him.

The latest accusation surfaced when Lindsay Menz, 33, of Frisco, Texas, told CNN that Franken, 66, grabbed her when they posed for a photo together at the 2010 Minnesota State Fair. Franken, a second-term senator, already faces a Senate ethics investigation into allegations that he inappropriately touched a fellow performer on a USO tour back in 2006.

He is the first sitting lawmaker to face accusations by women of inappropriate behavior in the wake of an ongoing wave of allegations against powerful men across American society.

Menz said she attended the fair with her husband and father and met the senator at a local radio booth sponsored by her father’s business. As her husband held up a phone to take the photo, Franken “pulled me in really close, like awkward close, and as my husband took the picture, he put his hand full-fledged on my rear,” Menz told CNN. “It was wrapped tightly around my butt cheek.”

“It wasn’t around my waist. It wasn’t around my hip or side. It was definitely on my butt,” she told the news channel. “I was like, oh my God, what’s happening.”

In a statement to CNN, Franken did not deny that the incident took place.

“I take thousands of photos at the state fair surrounded by hundreds of people, and I certainly don’t remember taking this picture. I feel badly that Ms. Menz came away from our interaction feeling disrespected,” Franken said in a statement to CNN.

Franken’s office did not return a separate request for comment. Over the weekend, an aide told the Minneapolis Star Tribune that Franken planned to spend the Thanksgiving holiday week with his family in Washington, “and he’s doing a lot of reflecting.”

Continued....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpos ... c9b011f3cc
The greatest sin is to be unconscious. ~ Carl Jung

We may not choose the parameters of our destiny. But we give it its content. ~ Dag Hammarskjold 'Waymarks'
User avatar
Cordelia
 
Posts: 3697
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: America's Garden of Dicks

Postby seemslikeadream » Mon Nov 20, 2017 7:22 pm

Charlie Rose


Russell Simmons


Sexual assault reports from Fort Bragg increased 28 percent

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sexual-ass ... 8-percent/


Hacking pioneer John Draper responds to sexual assault allegations
https://www.dailydot.com/layer8/john-dr ... -response/

Conservative Activist Perkins Reportedly Covered Up Sexual Assault Against Teenager
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/ ... sault.html


Actress Demi Mann says that she was repeatedly sexually assaulted by Cameron Mitchell and that the agency ignored her request for help.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/thr-e ... nt-1059329


3rd Woman Accuses Gossip Girl’s Ed Westwick of Sexual Assaul
http://www.vulture.com/2017/11/third-wo ... sault.html



Image

Alabama's biggest newspapers urge voters to 'reject Roy Moore'

by Brian Stelter @brianstelter
November 19, 2017: 11:52 AM ET


Alabama papers urge voters to 'reject Roy Moore'
The three biggest newspapers in Alabama have a message for their readers: "Stand for Decency, Reject Roy Moore."
The Alabama Media Group stripped the editorial across its Sunday front pages. The unusual step comes 10 days after misconduct allegations first surfaced against Moore, the Republican nominee for the state's Senate seat.
The editorial doubles as an endorsement of Moore's opponent, Democrat Doug Jones. It appears in The Birmingham News, Mobile Press-Register and The Huntsville Times and it is prominently featured on the papers' shared website AL.com.
"This is an important moment in Alabama and America, and we felt such treatment was in line with what is at stake in this race," Michelle Holmes, the VP of content for AL.com, told CNNMoney early Sunday.
The election is 23 days away.
The papers previously said that Moore was "grossly unfit" for office, but they stopped short of endorsing Jones.
Now the joint editorial board says that "there is only one candidate left in this race who has proven worthy of the task of representing Alabama. He is Doug Jones."
The editorial concludes: "The voters must make their voices heard."

There's a perennial debate in journalism circles about how much newspaper endorsements matter.
Moore is running an anti-media campaign, complete with lawsuit threats, so he may cite the front-page denouncements as another example of the "establishment" out to get him.
But the editors in this case aren't big shots from Washington. They are Alabamians who decided to weigh in.
"This election is a turning point for women in Alabama," the editorial says.
Headlines in other Alabama papers on Sunday also reflected the contentious campaign.
The lead story in the Dothan Eagle is headlined, "Moore critic: Alabama Senate race a battle for nation's soul."
In the Montgomery Advertiser: "Moore reaction varies widely."
In the Tuscaloosa News, the question no one can answer until election day: "How will controversy affect voter turnout?
http://money.cnn.com/2017/11/19/media/a ... index.html



21st Century Fox in $90 million settlement tied to sexual harassment scandal
Jonathan Stempel
3 MIN READ
(Reuters) - Twenty-First Century Fox Inc has reached a $90 million settlement of shareholder claims arising from the sexual harassment scandal at its Fox News Channel, which cost the jobs of longtime news chief Roger Ailes and anchor Bill O‘Reilly.

FILE PHOTO - The 21st Century Fox logo is seen outside the News Corporation headquarters in Manhattan, New York, U.S. on April 29, 2016. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/File Photo
The settlement, which requires a judge’s approval, resolves what are known as “derivative” claims against Fox officers and directors, including: Rupert Murdoch and his son Lachlan, who are Fox’s executive chairmen; James Murdoch, another son and its chief executive, and Ailes’ estate.

The defendants did not admit wrongdoing in agreeing to the settlement filed with the Delaware Chancery Court.

Monday’s settlement calls for insurers of Fox officers, Fox directors and Ailes’ estate to pay the $90 million to the New York-based company for the benefit of shareholders.

Fox will enhance governance and said it created the Fox News Workplace Professionalism and Inclusion Council to ensure a proper workplace environment, bolster training and further the recruitment and advancement of women and minorities.


The council has four independent members, including former federal judge Barbara Jones.

In a typical derivative case, shareholders sue in the name of a company to remedy wrongs inflicted by an alleged lack of oversight by a company’s officers and directors.

Ailes’ estate disputed many of the allegations in the settlement, which was reached before a complaint was formally filed, court records show.

“The Workplace Council gives our management team access to a braintrust of experts with deep and diverse experiences in workplace issues,” Jack Abernethy, co-president of Fox News Channel, said in a statement. “We look forward to benefiting from their collective guidance.”

Shareholders were led by the City of Monroe Employees’ Retirement System in Michigan. Their lawyer, Max Berger, said in a statement the accord would provide “meaningful benefits” for shareholders and Fox News employees.

The accord is not the first big derivative settlement involving a Murdoch-led company.

In 2013, former Fox parent News Corp reached a $139 million settlement of derivative claims that its board turned a blind eye to phone hacking at its London tabloids.

Two years later, the Delaware court approved a $275 million settlement involving “Call of Duty” videogame maker Activision Blizzard Inc over a stock sale by Vivendi SA.

The scandal at Fox began in July 2016 when former anchor Gretchen Carlson filed a lawsuit accusing Ailes of harassment. O‘Reilly lost his job in April after being accused of harassment, and has denied wrongdoing.

Ailes died the next month. Fox faces other private civil litigation tied to the scandal.

The case is City of Monroe Employees’ Retirement System v Murdoch et al, Delaware Chancery Court, No. 2017-0833.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-fox- ... SKBN1DK2NI
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: America's Garden of Dicks

Postby Cordelia » Tue Nov 21, 2017 3:05 pm


Report: Conyers settled wrongful dismissal complaint over 'sexual advances'


By Olivia Beavers - 11/20/17 10:11 PM EST

Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.), the longest-serving current House member, reportedly settled a wrongful dismissal complaint in 2015 after a former employee accused him of firing her for resisting his "sexual advances."

Four former staffers signed affidavits, three of which were notarized, saying that Conyers, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, repeatedly made engaged in unwanted sexual behavior with his female staff, BuzzFeed News reported Monday night.

Documents examined by BuzzFeed described a wide-range of inappropriate conduct, including making requests for sexual favors, caressing and touching, as well as having his staff contact and transport women they believed were sexually involved with him.

Four unnamed sources who were involved with the case confirmed to BuzzFeed News that the documents are authentic.

Two women wrote in their affidavits that they believed Conyers used office resources to pay for the travels of women with whom he was having affairs. Another staffer described the task of driving women to and from the lawmaker’s apartment and hotel rooms.

The woman who claimed wrongful dismissal claims that Conyers would ask her to work with him in private rooms where he would allegedly start describing sexual fantasies to her, including encouraging her to "touch" his penis.

Another former employee recalled a similar incident, in which Conyers asked her to “just cuddle up with me and caress me before you go” after she refused his request to stay with him overnight after traveling to a fundraising event.

Continued.../
http://thehill.com/homenews/house/36130 ... l-advances


Image
"Watch those hands, John.”


WASHINGTON SECRETS


Maxine Waters to women: John Conyers 'has impeccable integrity on our issues'


by Paul Bedard | Nov 21, 2017, 9:14 AM

Rep. John Conyers, newly facing sexual misconduct charges from former aides, was praised by fellow Rep. Maxine Waters just last month as a champion of women.

During an address to organizers of the national Women’s March in which she lashed out at “rape culture” and President Trump, she singled out the Michigan lawmaker for special attention.

“You know, there is a member of Congress who has been supportive of women for many, many, many years,” said said in a keynote address to the Women's Convention Sojourner Truth Luncheon in Detroit.

“He is quiet, he is confident, he is powerful, but he has impeccable integrity on all of our issues. Give John Conyers a big round of applause.” C-SPAN captured her comments and those of others who spoke at the event.

Continued......
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/maxin ... le/2641351


Conyers acknowledged the settlement, first reported by BuzzFeed, but forcefully denied he ever sexually harassed his former aide.

"I expressly and vehemently denied the allegations made against me, and continue to do so," he said in a statement. "My office resolved the allegations – with an express denial of liability – in order to save all involved from the rigors of protracted litigation."

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/ ... ent-253977


Do taxpayers fund these Office of Compliance settlements w/non-disclosure clauses?
The greatest sin is to be unconscious. ~ Carl Jung

We may not choose the parameters of our destiny. But we give it its content. ~ Dag Hammarskjold 'Waymarks'
User avatar
Cordelia
 
Posts: 3697
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: America's Garden of Dicks

Postby seemslikeadream » Tue Nov 21, 2017 5:06 pm

do the taxpayers pay the sexual assaulter in chief's salary?

do the taxpayers pay the salary of the predator in chief's salary who just announced he wants Roy Moore child predator in the Senate?


republicans vote for a pedophile .....democrats vote for hearings on abusers

Pelosi Calls For Ethics Probe Into Conyers Sexual Misconduct Allegations
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/n ... misconduct


Why Cernovich?

By JOSH MARSHALL Published NOVEMBER 21, 2017 2:39 PM

We now know that in 2015 Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) settled a sexual harassment claim with a former staffer. The story originated when the notorious alt-right figure Mike Cernovich provided settlement documents to Buzzfeed. Buzzfeed, rightly, independently confirmed the story. The story was thus based on the documents but no longer relied on the documents or their authenticity. Conyers’ office has now confirmed the key details of the story. Conyers denies the underlying accusations and notes that he admitted no wrongdoing in the settlement. But that’s really beside the point since that’s in the nature of confidential settlements.

That story of the Conyers settlement now stands on its own without any reference to Cernovich. Numerous Democratic colleagues, including Nancy Pelosi, have now called for an ethics investigation of Conyers.

But that still leaves us with a separate question, one which has no bearing on the validity of the accusations against Conyers. Because again, the facts of this settlement have been confirmed by Buzzfeed and Conyer’s office.

Who was Cernovich’s source for these documents? He says he brought them to Buzzfeed because he knew credentialing and confirmation from a legitimate news organization would add credibility to the story, as it did. But again who is his source?

Normally, all sorts of people can be possible sources and leakers. And a number of people probably had these kinds of documents in their possession. Conyers’ office, the Congressional office that adjudicates these claims, the alleged victim, her legal representatives, members of Conyers staff. There are a number of people who likely had documents like this legitimately in their possession, which is to say not stolen. Whether or not they were allowed to link them is a different question. Leakers are often breaking some rules to leak. But I’m focusing on people who legally possessed them or had legal access to them. People in those positions could have lots of motives for leaking the documents: a desire for justice, revenge, simple belief that the truth should come out.

But here’s my question: which of all the people who had legitimate access to these documents would choose Mike Cernovich to bring them to? He’s an avowed racist. He’s a notorious conspiracy theorist and fabulist. Any of these people could have gone to the Post, the Times, countless news organizations. It is hard for me to figure why they would go to Mike Cernovich. For now I’ll just leave it as a question. Because I have no answer.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/why ... re-1096763



Image

we are going to out all these fuckin' abusers and then we are coming for the president of the abusers donald trump

Eight women say Charlie Rose sexually harassed them — with nudity, groping and lewd calls

Charlie Rose accused of making unwanted sexual advances

Charlie Rose, host of “Charlie Rose” and “CBS This Morning,” has been accused by eight women of unwanted sexual advances. (Jenny Starrs/The Washington Post)

Eight women have told The Washington Post that longtime television host Charlie Rose made unwanted sexual advances toward them, including lewd phone calls, walking around naked in their presence, or groping their breasts, buttocks or genital areas.

The women were employees or aspired to work for Rose at the “Charlie Rose” show from the late 1990s to as recently as 2011. They ranged in age from 21 to 37 at the time of the alleged encounters. Rose, 75, whose show airs on PBS and Bloomberg TV, also co-hosts “CBS This Morning” and is a contributing correspondent for “60 Minutes.”

There are striking commonalities in the accounts of the women, each of whom described their interactions with Rose in multiple interviews with The Post. For all of the women, reporters interviewed friends, colleagues or family members who said the women had confided in them about aspects of the incidents. Three of the eight spoke on the record.

Five of the women spoke on the condition of anonymity out of fear of Rose’s stature in the industry, his power over their careers or what they described as his volatile temper.

“In my 45 years in journalism, I have prided myself on being an advocate for the careers of the women with whom I have worked,” Rose said in a statement provided to The Post. “Nevertheless, in the past few days, claims have been made about my behavior toward some former female colleagues.

“It is essential that these women know I hear them and that I deeply apologize for my inappropriate behavior. I am greatly embarrassed. I have behaved insensitively at times, and I accept responsibility for that, though I do not believe that all of these allegations are accurate. I always felt that I was pursuing shared feelings, even though I now realize I was mistaken.

“I have learned a great deal as a result of these events, and I hope others will too. All of us, including me, are coming to a newer and deeper recognition of the pain caused by conduct in the past, and have come to a profound new respect for women and their lives.”

Within hours of the publication of this article, PBS and Bloomberg LP immediately suspended distribution of the “Charlie Rose” show. CBS announced that it was suspending Rose as it looked into the matter.

Most of the women said Rose alternated between fury and flattery in his interactions with them. Five described Rose putting his hand on their legs, sometimes their upper thigh, in what they perceived as a test to gauge their reactions. Two said that while they were working for Rose at his residences or were traveling with him on business, he emerged from the shower and walked naked in front of them. One said he groped her buttocks at a staff party.

Reah Bravo was an intern and then associate producer for Rose’s PBS show beginning in 2007. In interviews, she described unwanted sexual advances while working for Rose at his private waterfront estate in Bellport, N.Y., and while traveling with him in cars, in a hotel suite and on a private plane.

Two women who worked for Charlie Rose say he emerged from a shower and walked naked in front of them while they were working at his home or traveling with him for business. Above, Rose at home in Bellport, N.Y. (Ben Baker/Redux)
“It has taken 10 years and a fierce moment of cultural reckoning for me to understand these moments for what they were,” she told The Post. “He was a sexual predator, and I was his victim.”

Kyle Godfrey-Ryan, one of Rose’s assistants in the mid-2000s, recalled at least a dozen instances where Rose walked nude in front of her while she worked in one of his New York City homes. He also repeatedly called the then-21-year-old late at night or early in the morning to describe his fantasies of her swimming naked in the Bellport pool as he watched from his bedroom, she said.

“It feels branded into me, the details of it,” Godfrey-Ryan said.

She said she told Yvette Vega, Rose’s longtime executive producer, about the calls.

“I explained how he inappropriately spoke to me during those times,” Godfrey-Ryan said. “She would just shrug and just say, ‘That’s just Charlie being Charlie.’ ”

In a statement to The Post, Vega said she should have done more to protect the young women on the show.

“I should have stood up for them,” said Vega, 52, who has worked with Rose since the show was created in 1991. “I failed. It is crushing. I deeply regret not helping them.”

Godfrey-Ryan said that when Rose learned she had confided to a mutual friend about his conduct, he fired her.

Megan Creydt worked as a coordinator on the show from 2005 to 2006, overlapping with Godfrey-Ryan.

“It was quite early in working there that he put his hand on my mid-thigh,” said Creydt, who agreed to be interviewed on the record to support other women who were coming forward with what she deemed to be more serious claims concerning Rose.

She said that during the incident, Rose was driving his Mini Cooper in Manhattan while she was sitting in the passenger seat.

“I don’t think I said anything,” she said. “I tensed up. I didn’t move his hand off, but I pulled my legs to the other side of the car. I tried not to get in a car with him ever again. I think he was testing me out.”

Her then-boyfriend confirmed to The Post that she told him the story at the time.

In addition to the eight women who say they were harassed, The Post spoke to about two dozen former employees who spoke on the condition of anonymity. Six said they saw what they considered to be harassment, eight said they were uncomfortable with Rose’s treatment of female employees, and 10 said they did not see or hear anything concerning.

[“I am not okay”: The remarkable response from Rose’s co-host on CBS]

“He was always professional with me,” said Eleonore Marchand Mueller, a former assistant of Rose’s who worked for him from 2003 to 2005. “I never witnessed any unprofessional incidents.”

The show’s small, informal structure, with roughly 15 employees, and the centrality of Rose’s authority on a program he owns led to uncertainty over how to respond, said the women who felt victimized. “There wasn’t anybody to report this to if you felt uncomfortable,” one of them said.

The employees worked for Charlie Rose Inc., and not Bloomberg LP or PBS, which said they did not provide human resources support for the show.

The environment brimmed with the young and potentially vulnerable, hungry for scarce television jobs. “There are so few jobs,” said one of the women who said Rose groped her. “You know if you don’t behave a certain way, there’s someone else behind you.”

Rose traveled frequently, jetting off to interview world leaders across the globe and splitting time between two New York City residences and homes in Bellport — on Long Island — and North Carolina. Often at his side was a rotating cast of young assistants and producers.

The informal structure of Rose’s small show — with roughly 15 employees — and the centrality of the veteran journalist’s authority on a program he owns led to uncertainty over how to respond, said the woman who felt victimized. “There wasn’t anybody to report this to if you felt uncomfortable,” one of them said. Above, Rose at a gala in New York on Oct. 30, 2017. (Mike Coppola/Getty Images for the National Committee on American Foreign Policy)
The young women who were hired by the show were sometimes known as “Charlie’s Angels,” two former employees said. Rose frequently gave unsolicited shoulder rubs to several of them, behavior referred to among employees as “the crusty paw,” a former employee said.

Rumors about Rose’s behavior have circulated for years. One of the authors of this report, Outlook contributing writer Irin Carmon, first heard and attempted to report on the allegations involving two of the women while she was a journalist at Jezebel in 2010 but was unable to confirm them. In the past several weeks in the wake of accusations against Harvey Weinstein, Carmon and Post investigative reporter Amy Brittain jointly began contacting dozens of men and women who had worked on the “Charlie Rose” show or interviewed for jobs there.

A woman then in her 30s who was at the Bellport home in 2010 to discuss a job opportunity said Rose appeared before her in an untethered bathrobe, naked underneath. She said he subsequently attempted to put his hands down her pants. She said she pushed his hands away and wept throughout the encounter.

A woman who began as an intern in the late 1990s and was later hired full time described a “ritual” of young women at the show being summoned by Rose to his Manhattan apartment to work at a desk there. The woman described a day when Rose went into the bathroom, left the door open and turned on the shower.

She said he began to call her name, insistently. She ignored him, she said, and continued working. Suddenly, he came out of the bathroom and stood over her. She turned her head, briefly saw skin and Rose with a towel and jerked back around to avoid the sight. She said he said, “Didn’t you hear me calling you?”

She said she told someone in the office, and word got around. A few days later, she said, a male colleague approached her, laughing, “Oh, you got the shower trick.” The woman’s sister confirmed that her sibling had told her about the shower incident soon after it occurred.

Another woman said that during her internship in the early 2000s, Rose groped her breasts and stomach as she drove him from Bellport back to Manhattan. Her then-boyfriend, now husband, confirmed that she described the incident to him immediately after it occurred. When Rose invited her to work regularly and stay overnight at Bellport, her boyfriend told her to refuse the offer, and she did, both told The Post.

Prestige and fear

Rose’s eponymous show, with its trademark black background and round oak table, has been in production since 1991. What it lacks in mass viewership, the “Charlie Rose” show makes up for in prestige and high-profile bookings of the likes of former president Barack Obama, Oprah Winfrey and Warren Buffett. Rose’s show is produced by Charlie Rose Inc., an independent television production company, and distributed by PBS. It is filmed at Bloomberg headquarters in Manhattan.

Rose’s stature has only grown in recent years.

CBS tapped him in 2011 to help revamp its ailing morning show, now called “CBS This Morning,” expanding his audience. He has also been a contributing correspondent for “60 Minutes” for nearly a decade. His 2013 interview of Syria’s president won Emmy and Peabody awards. (None of the women who made accusations against Rose to The Post worked for PBS or CBS.)

Representatives from PBS, CBS and Bloomberg said they have no records of sexual harassment complaints about Charlie Rose.

When Time magazine named Rose one of its 100 most influential people in 2014, billionaire and former New York City mayor Michael R. Bloomberg described him as “one of the most important and influential people in journalism.”

Rose joined “CBS This Morning” in 2011. Here, he’s seen with co-anchor Norah O’Donnell, left, and Gayle King on March 13, 2017. (Michele Crowe/CBS via Getty Images)
Rose, who was divorced in 1980, has long had a reputation as a ladies man. His “CBS This Morning” co-host, Norah O’Donnell, introduced him at a 2014 fundraiser dinner by joking, “We’re all here because with Charlie Rose, one woman is never enough.”

Rose graciously accepted honors that night by saying that he was lucky to have worked throughout his career with “women who were smarter, more thoughtful and more eloquent than I was.”

There was also less flattering coverage. The now-defunct Radar magazine in 2007 called him a “toxic bachelor” and repeated an unnamed woman’s claim that Rose had “palmed her buttock like a honeydew.” His then-attorney, David Boies, who has recently drawn criticism for his representation of Harvey Weinstein, demanded a retraction. The magazine refused.

The “Charlie Rose” show prides itself on its highbrow intellectual ambition, but his life is glamorous, full of black-tie galas and famous friends. He can be charming and generous, consulting favored employees for their opinions on what to ask heads of state or whisking them off to exotic locations for interviews. But his wrath was swift and often fiercely personal, according to interviews with multiple former employees.

“Everybody is terrified of him,” said one of the women who said that Rose groped her when she was an intern. “He creates this environment of constant fear. And then he’ll shine a spotlight on you and make you feel amazing.”

Multiple women said they had at first been reassured by the presence of Vega, Rose’s executive producer, who has worked with him for decades. Two women who spoke to The Post said they repeatedly reported Rose’s inappropriate sexual behavior to Vega.

‘His poor judgment’

Working for the “Charlie Rose” show was a longtime dream for Reah Bravo, who in 2007 was a 29-year-old graduate student studying international affairs at Columbia University. She struggled to make ends meet during her unpaid internship, accruing credit card debt and eating free cereal in the Bloomberg food court.

One day, several months into the internship, Rose offered her a side gig at his home in Bellport on Long Island.

“Here is the deal: I’ll pay you $2,500 for the week plus all expenses for food, movies etc.,” he wrote to her on Aug. 9, 2007. “You will be there from Monday August 13-Friday afternoon, August 17. Your primary responsibilities are to organize and catalogue all my books and tapes and files ... It will help me a lot, be fun for you, and you will have a car all the time for whatever you need to do.”

Before she left for Bellport, Bravo said Vega told her that personal time with Rose was a key to becoming part of the team.

(Obtained by The Washington Post)
Bravo said she took the train to Bellport, where she said Rose met her at the Ronkonkoma station and took her to a bank to withdraw money to cover her expenses. She stayed at the Bellport home for about a week, sleeping in a bedroom in the main house. Rose was gone much of the time.

While she was there, Bravo said she received a message from a male producer. If Rose did anything “sketchy,” she said he told her, she should not hesitate to call the show’s car service to return home.

Late one night, Bravo said, Rose returned home after a night out. She said she tried to hurry out of the library in the guesthouse to return to her bedroom in the main house before Rose came in, but he intercepted her. She said he insisted that they have a glass of wine at the dining room table in the main house.

Then, he suggested they walk out to his dock and look at the moon, Bravo said. Once there, “he came up from behind me and he put his arms around me,” she said, remembering that she felt a mix of apprehension and confusion. “It reflected his poor judgment. How could a man of his stature and his power be doing something so inappropriate? . . . It seemed reckless.”

Caught off guard, she said she did not know how to respond and endured his embrace.

A day or two later, Bravo said, Rose drove her back to Manhattan. She said he began to tell her that he felt very alone in life, despite his wealth and success. He recalled a brush with death a year earlier during heart surgery in Paris and began to tear up, and she said she patted him on the shoulder to console him.

“I didn’t necessarily buy it,” she said. “I thought, ‘I’ll keep my distance and I feel sorry for him.’ But I didn’t think of him as a predator at that time.”

Bravo soon returned to Bellport for a second trip. She was working in the guesthouse and caught a glimpse of Rose rinsing off nude in an unenclosed outdoor shower. She said she quickly averted her eyes and moved away from the window.

Later, he asked if she had seen him showering, she said, and seemed disappointed when she said no. While at Bellport, Bravo said Rose repeatedly insisted that he needed to hear that she was comfortable at Bellport and how much she enjoyed it there.

She emailed him about her work ideas and also mentioned Bellport.

“Have I told you how much I absolutely enjoy it out there?” she wrote him on Sept 1, 2007. “The company, the conversation, the comfort...that said I’m happy to go out there for both the remainder of this weekend AND parts of the next in an effort to finish the books faster.”

That fall, she traveled with Rose to Aspen for a conference. On Oct. 1, after the trip, Bravo wrote an email to Vega, alluding to earlier issues with Rose:

“On a personal note, I know working for Charlie requires one to embrace his uniqueness and develop a professional relationship that can account for it. It’s taken a couple straight forward conversations between the two of us, but I feel I’m in a better place than previously. And that’s not to say that I was previously in a really bad place! It all might sound cryptic, but you seem to play somewhat of a motherly role for staff members and I just wanted you to know that I’m okay : )”

Vega responded the same day:

“I have some concerns for you especially in what you are trying to tell me in this email. Please know the following about me, I have worked with Charlie for 16 years, so there is nothing that I haven’t heard or possibly experienced – and that anything you ever reveal to me would be kept in confidence from anyone and from the top down, so that you can feel comfortable in that confidence...”

From left: Rose, “Charlie Rose” show executive producer Yvette Vega and Beth Hoppe, a PBS executive, speak at the 2013 Summer Television Critics Association tour in Beverly Hills, Calif. Two women who spoke to The Post said they repeatedly reported Rose’s inappropriate sexual behavior to Vega. In a statement, Vega says she regrets not doing more to protect the young women on the show. (Frederick M. Brown/Getty Images)
Toward the end of 2007, Bravo was given more responsibilities and Rose occasionally paid her for helping him prepare for interviews, speeches and conferences. Her new duties required more travel with Rose, and he frequently requested her company for working dinners, she said.

Rose would regularly hire drivers to take them around town. On more than one occasion, she said, he groped her in the back seat. One time, she said, he “grabbed me by my hair, holding a fist of it at the base of my scalp.” More than once, “he would grip my head tightly while talking to me. He held it so tightly that I couldn’t turn my neck in any direction. I was forced to look at him or to let him talk directly into my ear.”

In Indiana for a speaking engagement in March 2008, Rose summoned Bravo to his hotel suite to work on his speech. While she was working at a desk in the room, she said, he emerged naked from the shower and stood before a mirror where she could see him. She said she ignored him and kept working.

Later, flying on a small private plane alone with Rose, she said he requested that they watch a documentary about Algeria on a portable DVD player. Suddenly, she said, Rose got out of his seat and pressed his body onto hers.

“I felt at a loss. I mean, what am I going to do? We were how many feet up in the air?” she said, adding that they remained clothed. “I remember him being on top of me.”

Bravo said Rose’s advance was bizarre, brief and “animalistic.” Then he returned to his seat.

“I felt an immense sense of shame that I had greenlighted his actions because I didn’t fight back,” she said.

Bravo said she locked eyes with one of the two pilots as she disembarked. She said she interpreted his expression as one of “sympathy or maybe disgust.”

Later in 2008, she was hired as an associate producer but was already looking for another job. The same year, Bravo was offered a job that paid three times as much as the one at the “Charlie Rose” show. In response, Rose took her to the Spotted Pig, a well-known restaurant in Manhattan, and dangled a position as a producer in Washington. She could even live in a Georgetown residence where he sometimes stayed, she said he told her.

She said she declined.

“I was leaving because I was getting away,” she said. “I would never want to live someplace where he had keys.”

Since then, Bravo has worked as a corporate speechwriter and now lives in Europe with her husband and their young son.

In retrospect, Bravo said she feels shame and embarrassment about her warm correspondence with Rose.

“I read old emails, and I sound so sycophantic, it makes me sick,” she said. “But it was what he wanted, it made my work easier, and to an extent, it was the same game most staff members played. Male staffers did it, too. They just weren’t feeling as pathetic about it.”

Looking back, she is struck by how calculated Rose’s approach seemed.

“He most definitely said, on numerous occasions, ‘I’ve never forced you to do something you didn’t want to do,’ ” she said. “He would say this forcefully and wait for my confirmation after he said this. I remember once wondering if I was being recorded.”

Blurred lines

Kyle Godfrey-Ryan was in her early 20s and had taken time off from her college studies in the mid-2000s when a friend offered to introduce her to Charlie Rose. She was unfamiliar with his show but was soon hired to be his assistant.

From the beginning, there was a blurring of the boundaries between Rose’s professional and private life, she said. On her first day on the job, Rose injured his foot. She tended to him as he recovered.

But soon, Godfrey-Ryan said, he began yelling at her, calling her stupid and incompetent and pathetic.

“He repeatedly attacked her in front of other people,” recalled a former producer who spoke on the condition of anonymity. “He once said that because she hadn’t gotten a college degree she would never amount to anything better than his secretary.”

After the bouts of rage, Godfrey-Ryan said, Rose would often be conciliatory.

“It would usually entail some version of him also touching me,” she said. “A hand on the upper thigh. He’d give a hug but touch the side of the breast.”

She said she ignored his actions. Then he began calling her as late as midnight and as early as 6 a.m.

“It would be wanting to know details of my sex life,” she said. “ ‘Who’s next to you? What do you do? Is he touching you?’ And I was like, ‘Okay, Charlie, I’ll see you tomorrow.’ I just acted like it wasn’t happening.”

She said other calls involved a “very specific, repetitive fantasy” of her disrobing at the Bellport home and swimming “back and forth in the pool in the moonlight” as he watched from his bedroom.

Her boyfriend at the time, now her husband, told The Post that he was often present for these calls but said he did not know what was being discussed. The content of the calls, however, was openly discussed in the office and even joked about, according to Godfrey-Ryan and the producer who worked there at the time.

Godfrey-Ryan also said Rose would repeatedly walk in front of her naked at one of his New York City residences. Her husband confirmed that she complained to him about it at the time.

She said she ignored the nudity. “He was getting more and more frustrated that I wouldn’t engage,” she said.

Godfrey-Ryan said she reported the touching and the calls to Vega, but nothing happened.

“She just made me feel like I was being a dramatic little girl,” Godfrey-Ryan said. She stopped reporting the behavior.

Godfrey-Ryan said she eventually confided to a mutual friend outside the show about Rose, and the friend told Rose.

She said Rose fired her.

“He took me out to lunch and told me how embarrassed he was, how he didn’t treat me like that,” she said. “It was really about how I got it wrong, and, obviously, I couldn’t work there anymore.”

She later went back to school at Columbia. She has since launched her own business, Tune.Studio, which uses infrasonic wave technology to treat stress and improve moods, leading to “peace and happiness.”

“It makes me a little upset to see him on television,” she said. “Everything I experienced with journalism there made me not want to stay.”

A job interview, then denial

Another woman gave multiple interviews to The Post about her experience with Rose but requested anonymity out of concern for her privacy.

In 2009, she was in her mid-30s, looking to break into broadcast journalism after studying politics and earning her graduate degree in Europe. While working at a cultural foundation in New York City, her boss offered to put her in touch with Charlie Rose.

Rose responded with interest.

The meetings that followed, she said, were unconventional: a dinner at a restaurant, late at night with Rose’s prominent friends, where he drank a lot of wine. A sudden weekend invitation to lunch continued with her tagging along as Rose shopped for furniture. When he drove her home, she said she listened in alarm as he berated a producer over the phone.

Then he turned to the job applicant. “He put his hand on my knee and said, ‘Oh, I’m sorry about that,’ ” she said. “He said, ‘I hope you don’t mind, I’m from the South, we’re touchers.’ ”

No job offer came, but on June 8, 2010, Rose got back in touch, according to an email the woman provided. She was still unemployed and the job Rose described sounded ideal.

“He talked about this position, which he referred to as being his intellectual partner, that I would be the executive producer for global content,” she recalled.

By now, she had been told the unorthodox interview process was standard because of Rose’s packed schedule and desire to do the hiring for all positions by himself.

As part of the process, she visited Bloomberg’s Manhattan office and also discussed the job with Rose at his apartment.

“My producers come here all the time to work,” she said he told her.

She said Rose mentioned a salary of $120,000, described the job as involving frequent international travel and asked for references. Rose soon suggested they see how they traveled together by having her visit his Bellport house, she said.

On June 18, Rose sent her an email inviting her to the house that evening.

“As I mentioned, I’m going to my place on long island tonight to write...and then coming back tomorrow for a dinner. This is to invite to visit...

“You have your own wing of the house, or even a guesthouse, It’s on the water, plus Olympic pool, tennis court, plenty of movies and books and sailing and I run on the beach at sunrise and sunset...This has no influence on our dialogue about work projects.”

He added near the end of the email: “Bring someone if you like. I’m on deadline, so i will be writing all the time and will not be entertaining except breaks for exercise and meals. Let me know...before noon.”

(Obtained by The Washington Post)
Eager to land the job, the woman agreed to travel with Rose to Bellport, which is about 60 miles from Manhattan.

She gave the following account:

That evening, after stopping for dinner and getting lost, they arrived at the house after midnight. She did not see anyone else there. Rose proposed she choose a DVD of his show that they could watch together. After the show, Rose gave her a tour of the property. The guesthouse, she noticed, was packed with clutter, uninhabitable.

At the pool, Rose dangled his legs in the water and then said that he needed to change because his pant legs were wet. He returned wearing a white bathrobe, which was open; he wore nothing underneath.

“I thought, I’m doomed,” she said. “I was completely panicked. In retrospect, I thought of a million things I could have done.”

She said she was not intoxicated — Rose had drunk his wine and then hers at the restaurant — but said he appeared to be. It was nearly 2 a.m. and she was exhausted, she said. She also said she felt alone and powerless. It was the middle of the night, they were on his secluded property, and she did not know how to drive.

“I started talking in this feeble and compulsive way,” she said. “I started talking about power, how the abuse of power can be. He completely lost it. ‘What are you talking about? That’s certainly not the case.’ ”

She said he then tried to put a hand down her pants.

“By the time he touched me the first time, he was already very angry,” she said. “I was scared, and I was also kind of frozen.”

After that, her memory is “hazy,” she said. They ended up in his bedroom.

“I really, honestly, I’ve tried so hard, especially recently, since I’ve been thinking about this, to try to remember what happened between sitting by the pool and being in his bed,” she said. “I have no recollection of how we went from here to there. I do remember I was crying the entire time.”

He reached down her pants again, she said, and she pushed his hands away. As she wept, she said, Rose asked her, “Baby, oh baby, why are you crying?”

The encounter ended when he appeared to be asleep and she felt she could leave the room, she said.

The next day, she said there was little mention of what had happened. She described the previous night to him “as a bit of a disaster” and he said, “What do you mean?”

A few days later, she followed up about the job.

In retrospect, she said, “Remaining silent allowed me to continue denying what had occurred. It was in that state of denial that I wrote to him asking about the job.”

He replied with his regrets.

“The whole thing was really the most humiliating and most degrading experience I’ve ever had,” the woman says now. A friend she confided in at the time described her as having been “distraught” in recounting what happened.

“To have been used in the way she was left her feeling really confused and really distressed,” the friend told The Post. The friend encouraged her to write about her experience, and she chose to do so as a short story.

In one of the drafts that she shared with The Post, a tall, drawling television host named “Johnny Pose” brings a young woman to his country home on Long Island to discuss a job opportunity.

The woman said she changed some key details about what happened by the pool. And in the story, unlike in real life, she said, she viewed the host with contempt rather than fear.

She said she submitted the story to several magazine editors in 2010 and 2011. Paris Review editor Lorin Stein declined to publish the story but wrote to her in March 2011, “It has the ring of truth (alas).”

The woman titled the story, “The Hunt.”

The double entendre, she said, was intentional.

“I was hunting for a job,” she told The Post, “and he was hunting for me.”

Julie Tate and Alice Crites contributed to this report.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/investig ... dc94858f7a


Marcus: Are we now at risk of overreacting to sexual harassment?
By Ruth MarcusNovember 20, 2017


WASHINGTON - The national debate over sexual harassment and sexual assault has reached an important and precarious moment as it shifts from what behavior is acceptable to what punishment is warranted. Having underreacted for too long, are we now at risk of overreacting?

Frazier Thompson, III, who goes by his stage name, "Trae the Truth," smiles at a fan as he waits to buy building supplies at a hardware store, Monday, Nov. 6, 2017, in Houston. Celebrities came through on Harvey pledges, still millions... Veteran Zachary Ledford (Army 2010-2014) is employed at SpaceX on Wednesday, Nov. 8, 2017, in McGregor. ( Elizabeth Conley / Houston Chronicle ) SpaceX engineers put rocket engines through their paces Ava Pettit, 8, left, hugs the family dog, Zoe, Tuesday, June 27, 2017 in Webster. About a year ago Zoe bit Ava in the face while jumping for a treat. Ava's parents rushed her to a hospital in their insurance network, but while there, four out of the five doctors who treated Ava were not in network, leaving the family with a $5000 bill. The family ended up paying $3600 after negotiations. ( Michael Ciaglo / Houston Chronicle ) Blindsided Karen Fonseca, owner of a truck bearing a large "F--- Trump" sticker, and now a new "F--- Nehls" sticker, talks about her public disagreement with Fort Bend County Sheriff Troy Nehls, who made a Facebook threat to have her arrested for disorderly conduct. The press conference was held Monday, Nov. 20, 2017. 'F--- TRUMP' truck owner has new Troy Nehls sticker after arrest Held Back: Some Houston-area schools have high retention rates... Blake Shelton was named as People magazine's 2017 "Sexiest Man Alive." Blake Shelton? No, literally anyone else should have been the... Jennifer Decker. #MeToo and the Houston arts world
The welcome news is that society seems to have reached closure - if not universal enlightenment, then broad consensus - on some of the most outmoded and tiresome aspects of the discussion. Behavior that was excused or diminished is now deemed unacceptable. Once-widespread skepticism about accusers' credibility - Did she invite this? Why did she wait so long to complain? - has yielded, mostly, to a more sophisticated understanding of the pressures on women to remain silent.

I witnessed, up close, the earlier chapters of this revolution - Anita Hill and Clarence Thomas in 1991, Monica Lewinsky and Bill Clinton in 1998. This time feels different. Consider how quickly Senate Republicans switched from if-then to "I believe the women" in the case of Alabama Republican Senate nominee Roy Moore. Contrast that with the refusal to credit Hill's allegations against Thomas. Different political imperatives, but also different times.

Sure, the current furor will recede; when it does, problems will persist. For women, going public with complaints will never be easy. And if law firm associates or Wall Street bankers now feel more empowered to speak up about harassment, what of waitresses or factory workers? Still, we are at a new moment in which the risks - for abusers in preying on women, and for employers in tacitly tolerating such conduct - have become greater than ever before.

That change is as big as it is belated. My 20-something daughters, if they ever find themselves in this uncomfortable spot, will face a less daunting calculus in speaking up than I did at their age. On this subject, the country may not be woke, but it is awakening.

Yet a perplexing aspect of the current debate involves the question of what should happen to those guilty of misbehavior and the tendency, common to revolutions, to overcorrect for past sins. If society once ignored sexual harassment - and we certainly did - one risk, now evident with the case of Minnesota Sen. Al Franken, is overcompensating for earlier apathy. The two dangers are not equivalent - ignoring sexual abuse and assault is far worse than punishing its perpetrators too severely.

Even so, not all crimes deserve the death penalty. Not all bad behavior warrants expulsion, firing or resignation. The clamor for Franken's head is, at best, premature - sentence first, trial (or Senate Ethics Committee investigation) later. At worst, it is alarmingly extreme, absent evidence of a pattern or misbehavior in the Senate.

Let us stipulate: Al Franken behaved like a big, not-so-fat idiot. His behavior was appalling. Under the guise of rehearsing for a skit, he allegedly kissed fellow USO performer Leeann Tweeden against her will, sticking his tongue in her mouth. He posed for a decidedly not funny photograph in which he appears to grope Tweeden's breasts while she is asleep. Not OK. But also not Roy Moore, Democratic version - or even Bill Clinton, 2017 edition. On the spectrum from predatory to boorish, Moore and Clinton are on one end, Franken closer to the other.


The question now facing the district is whether it provided the Texas Education Agency the kind of detailed, robust plan that will result in a dramatic turnaround in academic performance at Kashmere High School. (File Photo) Plans, hopes Marcus: Are we now at risk of overreacting to sexual harassment? City Hall in downtown Houston. (File Photo) Brown: State, local tax deductions are vital to Houston A man holds a sign during a Oct. 9, 2017, press conference in Houston calling for action to help recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, also know as DACA. ( Jon Shapley / Houston Chronicle ) Tuesday letters: Dreamers, traffic challenges, medical bills 01/10/1967 - Barbara Jordan takes oath to become first African American Texas state senator since 1883 and the first black woman to serve in the Texas Senate. Pandit: Barbara Jordan remains unique to Texas Senate
Such context matters in the sentencing phase. This wasn't a workplace, exactly, and Franken, while the tour headliner, wasn't Tweeden's boss. The atmosphere was sexualized; as Tweeden noted, "Like many USO shows before and since, the skits were full of sexual innuendo geared toward a young, male audience." Comedy doesn't justify assault or, as Louis C.K. taught, public masturbation, but it invites a more transgressive atmosphere than, say, the U.S. Senate.

So what should happen to Franken et al? The notion of the cleansing purge has its satisfactions, and for Democrats in Franken's case, the added appeal of excising a political liability. No one wants to keep seeing that picture.

Yet I recoil at the employment equivalent of a mass death sentence for all sexual harassers. For some offenders - Harvey Weinstein, Kevin Spacey and Roy Moore - I have no sympathy. Their alleged conduct is close to, if not across, the line of criminality.

Others pose a harder case. Must they remain forever pariahs? Is rehabilitation possible? The focus is, and should be, on victims. But as employers engage in an overdue reckoning on how to rid workplaces of intolerable conduct, they - we - are going to have to wrestle as well with how to treat the victimizers.
http://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion ... 372712.php



Moore Campaign Attempts To Refute Mall Ban And One Accuser’s Story

Former Alabama Chief Justice and U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore speaks at the Vestavia Hills Public library, Saturday, Nov. 11, 2017, in Birmingham, Ala. According to a Washington Post story Nov. 9, an Alabama woman said Moore made inappropriate advances and had sexual contact with her when she was 14. (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson)
Brynn Anderson/AP
By NICOLE LAFOND Published NOVEMBER 21, 2017 8:11 AM
The Roy Moore for Senate campaign released two statements on Monday evening, which featured statements from witnesses that the campaign claims refute allegations about Moore being banned from a mall in his hometown and muddies the testimony of one of his accusers.

“On Monday evening, the Moore Campaign unveiled statements from key witnesses that completely bust the story of Beverly Nelson and Gloria Allred and further reveal an unconscionable bias on the part of state and national press to hide the truth from Alabama voters who will undoubtedly see through the “fake news” and elect Judge Moore for the man that they have always known him to be,” one of the statements said, referencing Nelson’s accusations that surround her encounter with Moore at the Olde Hickory House restaurant. The second statement about the mall also attacked the media.

Nelson came forward with her attorney Allred last week after The Washington Post first reported that Moore allegedly pursued relationships or made unwanted sexual advances toward multiple women when they were teens and Moore was in his 30s.

Nelson said Moore allegedly offered her a ride home from the Olde Hickory House where she worked when she was 16. He then allegedly parked his car near dumpsters behind the building and attempted to force her to have sex with him, she said. Nelson has also gone public with her high school yearbook which she claims was signed by Moore.

Moore has vehemently denied all the accusations against him and his campaign’s main line of defense has been questioning the legitimacy of the signature in Nelson’s yearbook. In Monday evening’s statements, the campaign quoted multiple witnesses who used to work at Olde Hickory House, attempting to poke holes in Nelson’s account of the incident.

A former waitress said the restaurant didn’t hire anyone under the age of 16, but Nelson said she was 15 when she started. Two former employees questioned the location of the dumpster, saying it was on the side of the building, not the back. A few of Moore’s witnesses said there wasn’t an entrance to the building from the back of the parking lot and another former employee said the restaurant never closed before 11 p.m., which they said contradicts Nelson’s claims that the restaurant closed at 10 p.m. the night of the alleged assault.

The campaign also claimed that these witness accounts had been shared with multiple news outlets, but “the outlets have failed to report.”

The second statement included quotes from three former employees of Gadsden mall, one of whom oversaw mall security, attempting to discredit reports that Moore was banned from the mall because of his alleged behavior toward teenage girls.

One witness, Johnnie V. Sanders who the Moore campaign said was an employee of Gadsden Mall from the late 1970s to the mid-2000’s, said there was a different “prominent” man who was banned from the mall for similar reasons and said he may have been confused with Moore.

“There was a prominent man of Etowah County, whom is now deceased that was banned for reasons such as the allegations against Judge Moore. However, due to respect for the family, I decline to reveal his name,” Sanders said in the statement. “Despite allegations against other patrons of the mall, I never heard of Roy Moore’s name come in conversation with any such misconduct against women or a supposed banning from the Gadsden Mall.”

Moore campaign strategist Brett Doster said the campaign put out the statements to combat the “one-sided reporting” on the accusations against the former judge.

“The people of Alabama are tired of false accusations and one-sided reporting from the liberal media,” Doster said in the statement. “Truth matters or it doesn’t and the Moore Campaign will deliver the truth about the character of Judge Roy Moore to affirm what the people of Alabama are already convinced of.”
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/m ... sers-story
Mazars and Deutsche Bank could have ended this nightmare before it started.
They could still get him out of office.
But instead, they want mass death.
Don’t forget that.
User avatar
seemslikeadream
 
Posts: 32090
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: into the black
Blog: View Blog (83)

Re: America's Garden of Dicks

Postby Cordelia » Tue Nov 21, 2017 7:54 pm

Do taxpayers fund these Office of Compliance settlements w/non-disclosure clauses?


seemslikeadream » Tue Nov 21, 2017 8:06 pm wrote:do the taxpayers pay the sexual assaulter in chief's salary?

do the taxpayers pay the salary of the predator in chief's salary who just announced he wants Roy Moore child predator in the Senate?


Of course we do.

btw, found an answer, fwiw...........



Nearly $1 million for harassment, other claim settlements in Congress in 2017 alone


by Anna Giaritelli | Nov 17, 2017, 9:16 AM

Nearly $1 million in taxpayer-funded settlements have been paid to eight victims of sexual harassment and other work-related issues on Capitol Hill in 2017, according to a congressional Office of Compliance report released late Thursday.

Image

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/treas ... le/2641021


2002 & 2007 were busy settlement years, but I guess we'll never know who the charges were against.
The greatest sin is to be unconscious. ~ Carl Jung

We may not choose the parameters of our destiny. But we give it its content. ~ Dag Hammarskjold 'Waymarks'
User avatar
Cordelia
 
Posts: 3697
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:07 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests