by Belligerent Savant » Mon Feb 26, 2024 6:36 pm
Consider that certain evil acts may not be fully at the agency of the human(s) performing such acts.*
There are vile/evil acts committed as ritual, under the belief that such acts will bestow power, wealth, and certain control over others. Perhaps this is all part of the delusions of Man, but rest assured there are humans — particularly in the upper echelons of power/influence, both currently and historically, that have subscribed to notions that non-human entities can ‘help’ them in some form or fashion, or otherwise that such non-human entities utilize humans to commit atrocities on their behalf.
The question then, is: are these humans, historically & currently — a significant subset of whom are in positions of influence/power — all delusional/mad for subscribing to the notion of 'entities'/non-human influence, or is there substance to these notions, at least in certain cases?
To be clear, I’m not claiming here that all evil/vile acts are the workings of ‘entities’. But increasingly, it appears there are other drivers for recent unprecedented wide-scale actions beyond (or in addition to) human greed/power interests.
*EDIT to add: the other factor to consider is the extent evil actors are in a fugue/dissociative state, or otherwise perhaps controlled via MKULTRA-esque programming, and therefore not fully aware or conscious of their actions.
Once again, however, we can ruminate as to the 'top-end' prime movers of such techniques/mental states.
