US Presidential Election 2020

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: US Presidential Election 2020

Postby JackRiddler » Sat Jan 16, 2021 8:12 pm

.

See your words? Were you mistaken?

Harvey » Sat Jan 16, 2021 9:13 am wrote:So, when someone points out that QAnon is possibly an FBI creation, a psy-op, we can see why it makes sense to check the machine-like, automatic hatred toward the products of QAnon, on the basis that this emotional response will be channeled, whether you like it or not, very precisely, into everything you hate and stand against and that they too are ultimately victims of the same corrupt society as you.

After all, the state must continue to manufacture racism if it is to continue to turn ordinary Americans into killers, happy to be sent abroad to murder brown skinned people in very far away places, and who just happen to live above American oil.


Are they victims? See, your word?

Perhaps as individuals or class members.

Certainly not when they voluntarily constitute themselves as the Trump mob storming the legislature. In that form, they are very much about making, not being, victims. And they have not only targeted the "odious" legislators (again, on orders from the indisputably more odious president, and of course their own odious allies within the legislature). They have targeted the majority of the country whose vote they wish to undo -- and whom they wish to subordinate (further), or worse.

Is the state "manufacturing them as racists"? In some long-run sense, sure.

Seems to me they were trying to make the state a lot more racist than it already is, so you should be phrasing that the other way around.

Am I so difficult to understand?

A pro-Trump mob, summoned by Trump himself, organized by fascists, and incited by Trump personally, stormed the Capitol so as to shut down the legislature before it could certify the election that Trump, the president, had lost, so that he could stay in power.

Is this what you seem incapable of understanding? If so, sorry that it has become so difficult for you to follow.

Perhaps you have premises you find hard to surrender. About how left and right, or even racist and anti-racist, cannot actually exist, but are divide-and-conquer categories created by the true controllers in real time.

Okayfine, if it pleases you, but it certainly doesn't describe the real country in which I live.

.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 15988
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Presidential Election 2020

Postby PufPuf93 » Sat Jan 16, 2021 8:27 pm

This is a video of a young (white) police officer (Daniel Hodges) stuck in a door and beaten by the insurgents and what he has to say in the aftermath on January 6, 2021.

Pretty basic and real from my pov.

Video at tweet.

“If it wasn’t my job I would do it for free. It was absolutely my pleasure to crush a white nationalist insurrection,” he said. “And we’ll do it as many times as it takes.”

https://twitter.com/liamstack/status/13 ... 8168006657
User avatar
PufPuf93
 
Posts: 1884
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 12:29 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Presidential Election 2020

Postby Harvey » Sat Jan 16, 2021 8:31 pm

JackRiddler » Sun Jan 17, 2021 1:12 am wrote:.

See your words? Were you mistaken?

Harvey » Sat Jan 16, 2021 9:13 am wrote:So, when someone points out that QAnon is possibly an FBI creation, a psy-op, we can see why it makes sense to check the machine-like, automatic hatred toward the products of QAnon, on the basis that this emotional response will be channeled, whether you like it or not, very precisely, into everything you hate and stand against and that they too are ultimately victims of the same corrupt society as you.

After all, the state must continue to manufacture racism if it is to continue to turn ordinary Americans into killers, happy to be sent abroad to murder brown skinned people in very far away places, and who just happen to live above American oil.


Are they victims? See, your word?

Perhaps as individuals or class members.

Certainly not when they voluntarily constitute themselves as the Trump mob storming the legislature. In that form, they are very much about making, not being, victims. And they have not only targeted the "odious" legislators (again, on orders from the indisputably more odious president, and of course their own odious allies within the legislature). They have targeted the majority of the country whose vote they wish to undo -- and whom they wish to subordinate (further), or worse.

Is the state "manufacturing them as racists"? In some long-run sense, sure.

Seems to me they were trying to make the state a lot more racist than it already is, so you should be phrasing that the other way around.

Am I so difficult to understand?

A pro-Trump mob, summoned by Trump himself, organized by fascists, and incited by Trump personally, stormed the Capitol so as to shut down the legislature before it could certify the election that Trump, the president, had lost, so that he could stay in power.

This is what you are incapable of understanding.

Sorry that this has become so difficult for you to follow.

Perhaps it's the case that one cannot wake a sleeping man?

But more likely, you have premises you find hard to surrender. About how left and right, or even racist and anti-racist, cannot actually exist but are divide-and-conquer categories created by the true controllers in real time.

Okayfine, if it pleases you, but it certainly doesn't describe the real country in which I live.

.



'Misunderstood victim' was entirely your phrase.
And while we spoke of many things, fools and kings
This he said to me
"The greatest thing
You'll ever learn
Is just to love
And be loved
In return"


Eden Ahbez
User avatar
Harvey
 
Posts: 4167
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 4:49 am
Blog: View Blog (20)

Re: January 6th - Who was in on it?

Postby JackRiddler » Mon Jan 18, 2021 6:16 pm

This segment, from Abby Martin's Empire Files, asks the right questions concerning what happened and who was involved in operational planning and facilitation. I don't know if in the continuation -- for subscribers -- they get into the money side. I also don't see how the phrase "inside job" makes any sense for this case, other than as promotion. The public ringleader is the president in office when the attempt is made, so how is one to define inside/outside? In any case, in retrospect the open letter from the 10 living defense secretaries, which of course is a letter of unindicted major war criminals, is not merely to be mocked. They certainly had wind of something afoot, to get them all to send such a signal.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKDcsH2XXQI

To put it in abstract terms, there appear to be three interlocking rings at work, though not everyone within each will have been aware of the shape of the whole from the start:

1) Funders and orchestrators (see first article below) -- and here there are obvious likely persons of interest, like several people currently in Congress, or like MyPillow Guy, as well as more high-level actors involved, at least at a deniable distance (Mercers).

2) Facilitators placed within LE and natsec institutions (Pentagon, Capitol Police, etc.) -- the LIHOP part, which the podcast above starts with.

3) Cadre, tactical ground leadership, muscle: fascists and foot-soldiers and eager armed yahoos present in DC, who acted as the more coordinated attackers within the "riot," the organizations of which they are members or recruits, a.k.a. disposable deniable deplorables. (Second article below.)

Opinion
US Capitol breach
The Capitol riot wasn't a fringe 'uprising'. It was enabled by very deep pockets

Brendan O'Connor


That siege was just one battle in a decades-long assault on democracy, funded by billionaire donors and corporate interests

A window at the US Capitol building broken by supporters of US President Donald Trump. Photograph: Dmitry Kirsanov/TASS

Mon 18 Jan 2021 07.18 EST
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfr ... ep-pockets


While law enforcement officials in Washington ought to be held accountable for their alleged culpability in the deadly violence at the US Capitol earlier this month, and the off-duty cops and members of the military who participated in it ought to be disciplined, the attempted auto-coup cannot solely be understood through the lens of policing and security. At least as much responsibility lies with the billionaire donors and corporate interests – in other words, the capitalists – who made this moment possible.

Billionaire backer feels 'deceived' by Josh Hawley over election objections

Already a picture of the individuals, organizations, and institutions who lent their weight to the movement that stormed Congress has begun to emerge. Last year, the secretive and influential Center for National Policy (CNP), which author Anne Nelson describes as “connecting the manpower and media of the Christian right with the finances of western plutocrats and the strategy of right-wing Republican political operatives,” called for state legislators in six swing states to reject Joe Biden’s election victory. CNP leaders were scheduled to speak at the rally on the morning of 6 January, where Donald Trump encouraged his supporters to march on the Capitol.

Carrie Severino, president of the Judicial Crisis Network, which has contributed millions to the Republican Attorneys General Association (Raga), listed as one of the participating organizations in the rally. Raga’s fundraising arm, the Rule of Law Defense Fund, sent robocalls encouraging Trump supporters to march on the Capitol ahead of the 6 January rally, at which the former chairman of Raga, Texas attorney general Ken Paxton, spoke. But major donors to Raga include not only rightwing bogeymen like Koch Industries, Walmart, or the Adelson family but also household corporate names like Comcast, Amazon and TikTok.

Likewise, although Koch Industries is the single largest corporate donor to Republican representatives who pledged to try to overturn the election results, the next biggest contributors included defense companies like Boeing, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon, as well as tech (Amazon) and finance (Goldman Sachs) and insurance (Aflac), according to the Center for Media and Democracy. And while Charles Koch has maintained a posture of personal ambivalence, verging on distaste, for Donald Trump, super Pacs heavily funded by the donor network he and his late brother founded have spent millions supporting congressional Republicans who rejected the outcome of the 2020 election.

Dick Uihlein, the chief executive of the Uline shipping company and a contributor to the Koch donor network, spent at least $2m getting Josh Hawley elected to the US Senate and has contributed more than $4m to the Tea Party Patriots, another one of the 11 groups listed as participating in the Stop the Steal coalition. In 2019, more than $20m was funneled through DonorsTrust, a donor-advised fund that disguises the source of major giving to nonprofits, to a dozen organizations that would ultimately contest the integrity of the 2020 presidential election, including $103,000 to Tea Party Patriots. In a statement provided to the Intercept, Tea Party Patriots cofounder Jenny Beth Martin denied spending any money on the Stop the Steal rally and condemned the violence that occurred.

Investigative journalists will continue to trace and disentangle the funding networks that facilitated 6 January. The list of names will grow longer; the sum of individual and corporate contributions greater. But already it is clear that what happened at the Capitol was not just the unintended consequence of specific capitalists’ ill-advised campaign donations; it was an expression of a deeper, ongoing crisis of capitalism, and the ruling class’s (sometimes contradictory) attempts to manage that crisis.

According to a report released late last year by the Institute for Policy Studies and Americans for Tax Fairness, the 651 billionaires in the United States added more than $1tn to their collective wealth since the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic, bringing the total to slightly more than $4tn. Meanwhile, the racialized distribution of labor in the United States – the concentration of workers of color in both essential industries, where they are more likely to be exposed to the pandemic, and service and hospitality industries, where layoffs have been rampant – means that Black, Latino, and Native Americans are significantly more likely to be hospitalized and die of Covid-19 than non-Hispanic white Americans. This serves as a stark reminder of the white supremacist character of the decades-long effort to defang and declaw the American labor movement – an effort funded and organized by the same far-right capitalists who laid the groundwork for 6 January.

The Capitol siege was just one battle in an ongoing, decades-long assault on democracy. Racist ideologues have served as the vanguard, but they have long been supported (sometimes openly, often tacitly) by a wide swathe of capitalists. The ultranationalist Maga diehards, Qanon cultists, and various fascists that stormed the Capitol are shock troops searching for a leader. Trump will likely prove too self-absorbed, too cowardly, and too lazy for the job. But no matter how many arrests are made or officials fired, the tide of history has returned us to the rocky shores of political violence and mass upheaval.

Brendan O’Connor is a freelance journalist and the author of Blood Red Lines: How Nativism Fuels the Right



Uh, not an article, but transcript from this DN segment (Jan 15) with A.C. Thompson.

https://www.democracynow.org/2021/1/15/ ... c_thompson

www.democracynow.org
From Charlottesville to the Capitol: Trump Fueled Right-Wing Violence. It May Soon Get Even Worse

AMY GOODMAN: Security is being ramped up in Washington, D.C., and state capitols across the United States as the FBI is warning of more “potential armed protests” in the lead-up to Joe Biden and Kamala Harris’s inauguration, following last week’s deadly insurrection at the Capitol. By Wednesday, 21,000 National Guard troops are expected to be in Washington, D.C. FBI Director Christopher Wray spoke publicly for the first time, more than a week after the insurrection, Thursday.

CHRISTOPHER WRAY: We’re concerned about the potential for violence at multiple protests and rallies planned here in D.C. and at state capitol buildings around the country in the days to come, that could bring armed individuals within close proximity to government buildings and officials.

AMY GOODMAN: Federal authorities have arrested over a hundred people who took part in last week’s deadly insurrection at the Capitol that left five — actually, six [sic] people — dead. Police and federal agents continued to round up rioters Thursday. That’s five people dead. Among the latest arrests, Kevin Seefried, who was photographed carrying a Confederate battle flag through the Capitol; former U.S. Olympic medalist Klete Keller, who wore his Olympic swim team jacket to the riots; Robert Sanford, a retired firefighter who was filmed throwing a fire extinguisher at Capitol Police officers, striking three of them in the head; and Peter Stager, an Arkansas man filmed beating a police officer at the Capitol with an American flag.

In Arizona, prosecutors say they’ve uncovered evidence that the intent of some of the rioters was to, quote, “capture and assassinate elected officials in the United States government.” Prosecutors revealed the QAnon conspiracy theorist Jacob Chansley, who is also known as Jake Angeli, left a note for Mike Pence in the Senate, warning, quote, “It’s only a matter of time, justice is coming.” Chansley faces charges of violent entry and disorderly conduct, after he was filmed posing shirtless, wearing buffalo horns and holding a spear on the Senate dais.

And in Texas, a federal prosecutor has revealed more details about its case against retired Air Force officer Larry Brock, who was seen inside the Capitol dressed in military gear, holding zip ties. Prosecutors claim that Brock was prepared to take hostages and, quote, “perhaps execute members of the U.S. government.”

Meanwhile, The Washington Post reports dozens of people on a terrorist watch list — mostly white supremacists — were in Washington on the day of the insurrection.

We go now to A.C. Thompson, staff reporter with ProPublica, who has covered the rise of the right-wing extremist and white supremacist groups for years, his latest piece headlined “Members of Several Well-Known Hate Groups Identified at Capitol Riot.” He’s joining us from Lansing, Michigan.

A.C., thanks so much for coming back to Democracy Now! Can you start off by responding to what happened last week in Washington, D.C.? Did it surprise you, this mass insurrection, after President Trump had for weeks been calling for this protest and addressed them before they marched to the Capitol? And who was behind it?

A.C. THOMPSON: One of our contacts in the far-right movement said to us, “Hey, I think this is going to go in a very extreme direction. And, in fact, I’m not going to mobilize my people to participate, because I think it’s going to be very violent.” And that was a signal to us that this was going to be quite extreme.

We had seen this building over the past year, though. If you go back to January 2020, in Richmond, Virginia, 20,000 armed people showed up at the state House there. In the spring, there were protests that were armed in Michigan at the state House, including one in which people stormed the building and intimidated legislators with weapons, with AR-15 assault rifles. We saw the Idaho state House get stormed. We saw the Oregon state House get stormed. We saw, in Olympia, Washington, by the Capitol there, there were shootings in the street two weeks in a row. Two people were shot, one each week. And so, this had been building for a long time.

I personally was at an armed rally at the Virginia state House a couple months ago, where about 50 men with weapons showed up and basically dared the police to arrest them, because they were in violation of the law. So, this was something that had been coming for a long time. And if you looked at the rhetoric online and you looked at what had been said by members of these groups for a long time, it was all about revolution, it was all about death to tyrants, it was all about civil war, for a long time.

On the day of the event, we saw militia groups like the Three Percenters, the Oath Keepers, who were playing a big role. We saw the conspiracy theorists, like the QAnon people, who were there. We saw, I think, a significant role played by the Proud Boys, who you could call an ultranationalist street-fighting gang or group. And I think we saw a lot of military vets and some current military there. And there were also people who belong to straight-up white supremacist or white nationalist groups.

AMY GOODMAN: You mentioned Virginia. We reported earlier this week that two of the rioters were off-duty Virginia police. And this goes to the issue of police and military from all over the country. You know, people were saying, “Where were the police?” Well, they were part of the riot, the insurrection, a number of them. You have police from Seattle, apparently New York, Philadelphia transit officers, a number of them, two Virginia officers. Now, this is just people who were identified. Can you talk about the — a PSYOPS guy, a military psychological operations. Can you talk about the significance of this?

A.C. THOMPSON: You know, I think there is a big concern that what we’ve seen in recent years is a lot of members of police departments, or at least some members of police departments, being radicalized in this right-wing direction. And in part, I think, what that’s been a product of is they’ve seen the rise of the racial justice movements and police accountability movements, and they say, “I feel under attack. The person who’s sticking up for us is Donald Trump, who’s super law and order, and so I’m going to get deep into the Donald Trump world.” And I think that’s part of what’s happened.

What’s happening now, though, is different. And what’s happening now is, when I was in D.C. at “Stop the Steal” protests and other protests in recent months, you would see the right-wing protesters did not want to fight with the police. They would say, “We’re the law-and-order people. We’re the pro-police people. We’re not going to fight with the police. We want to fight with the police, but we’re going to back off.” That has changed. That has pivoted. And now what you’re seeing in the chatter amongst the right-wing groups is, “We are at war with the police. The police are in bed with the reds. The police are a tool of this socialist takeover, which we believe magically is happening, without any facts. We believe that the police are subverting democracy. And we are now going after the police.” And that’s what you saw at the Capitol.

AMY GOODMAN: So, let’s talk about the lack of preparation at the Capitol. You see these police officers, the Capitol Police, some help by the Metropolitan Police, fending for themselves. And we got the reports this week of the level of threat assessment reports that would come before each Black Lives Matter protest. Nothing like that was issued now, and yet you have this coming together of all of these people from — and if you can explain what the terrorist watch list is? It’s not a no-fly list. And for many progressives, they may be very concerned about who makes up this list, but the fact is, scores of people on the FBI’s own list had gathered, and yet the FBI issued no reports, and there was so little preparation. We saw African American Capitol police essentially running for their lives, saying they didn’t have the support from the top, and they were being chased by the mob.

A.C. THOMPSON: Right. So, there’s a few things that I want to touch on here. And a few years ago, you and I were talking about Charlottesville. And what we had seen there was an intelligence breakdown, where, really, the intelligence analysts and the law enforcement personnel, who should have really been monitoring the online channels and the chatter, missed what was going on and what was going to develop. And then you saw multiple law enforcement agencies who were supposed to be there coordinating, working together, who really didn’t have a plan, and cooperation totally broke down. And when violence and rioting broke out, the people with the tactical gear, with the shields, with the helmets, with the riot gear, were nowhere near the violence.

You saw a lot of that happen at the Capitol, a lot of the same things happening over again, years later, with basically some of the same people showing up at both events. This is what’s baffling to me. The FBI has gotten very good in recent years at tracking and arresting and building cases against right-wing extremists, white supremacist extremists, anti-government extremists. In the run-up to the election, they built a lot of very complicated, important cases against people who were bent on violence against public officials, the kidnapping plot against Gretchen Whitmer, the governor in Michigan. They were very, very busy. And what I don’t understand is how that knowledge from the field agents out in the field doesn’t seem to have translated, as far as we can tell at this point, into intelligence products that would have gone out and been disseminated more broadly to other law enforcement agencies. That’s a thing.

Another thing is just simply the lack of personnel and the lack of preparation by the Capitol Police on the day of the event. I’ve been watching the D.C. Metropolitan Police for months now, and I think that they’ve been very professional, very sophisticated, in allowing protesters at these right-wing events in D.C. to express themselves, but not to harm people and not for violence to break out. That is clearly not the case with the Capitol Police. They did not evince that level of professionalism and sophistication.

AMY GOODMAN: The Washington Post reported earlier this week the FBI explicitly warned of violence and “war” at the U.S. Capitol in an internal report issued one day before last Wednesday’s deadly invasion. The report cited online posts, including one which said, quote, “Congress needs to hear glass breaking, doors being kicked in, and blood from their BLM and Pantifa slave soldiers being spilled. Get violent. Stop calling this a march, or rally, or a protest. Go there ready for war. We get our President or we die.”

So, A.C. Thompson, I mean, how much more explicit can you get? And, I mean, we’re not only talking about let’s do a postmortem on last week’s event — and “postmortem” is the right word. I mean, you’re talking about a number of people dead: two police officers — the Capitol Hill police officer, Sicknick, who died, and then one who took his own life — and then you have three people who died in medical emergencies, apparently. But we’re not only talking about the past; we’re talking about whether this is prologue to this weekend. I mean, Monday is Dr. Martin Luther King’s federal birthday, which is official — his birthday was today. But for years, white supremacists marched on state capitols to prevent it from being recognized as a national holiday. And then, of course, Wednesday, the inauguration.

A.C. THOMPSON: Yeah, I think I don’t want to be alarmist, and I don’t want to be the person who says the sky is falling, but I do think we have to be vigilant. I think we have to be looking forward. I think we have to be very, very careful in the months ahead. And this is why.

We were out on the campaign trail filming for Frontline at Trump rallies and at Trump speeches. And when we’d meet people, they would all say, “The only way the president is going to lose the election is if there’s massive fraud, and it’ll be probably massive fraud orchestrated by those nefarious globalists.” There are millions of people who believe, because of Trump’s incessant false messaging, that the election was fraudulent, that the election was stolen from him. And if you have just a very small percentage of those millions of people who are inclined to take violent action because they believe that we are on the cusp of a massively undemocratic transition of power, built around fraud, of course some of those people are likely to take very violent action to save, in their mind — you know, in their minds, to save this republic.

And that is the thing we must be concerned about. In America, it does not take very much money and very much skill to create a mass casualty event with a bomb or a gun. And that is something we’re going to have to be very vigilant about, while at the same time ensuring that people have a right to protest, that people have a right to express themselves.

AMY GOODMAN: I’m wondering if you can talk about the alliances between all of these groups and current sitting members of Congress. You’ve got Utah Republican Congressmember John Curtis, who showed reporters a death threat left on his door on Thursday, a poster with skulls and crossbones pasted over his eyes, and the caption, “Wanted for treason! For resisting the true electoral victor Trump.” Now, here is a congressman who, of course, was voicing concern about the fact that Republicans were not accepting the election of Joe Biden, but you’ve got other ones who led the charge about doing this. Can you talk about whether — the congressmembers and what should happen to them now? Even in President Trump’s latest video, he will not acknowledge this election of Joe Biden. And does it actually encourage the violence, the fact that he’s not showing up for the inauguration? Many may be deeply relieved that Trump won’t be there, but does that send a message it’s OK to target?

A.C. THOMPSON: I think there’s a couple things going on here. And the first thing is that we have not acknowledged the scale of threats, intimidation and violence against public leaders that’s occurred over the past year. We have so many public health officials in this country, at county and state levels, who have been threatened — at federal levels, as well — been threatened, who have been terrorized, who have had to get extra security, who have been doing their jobs and are in fear for their lives. And we, basically, as a society, have not grappled with that.

Now we’ve got elections officials, Republican and Democrat, who are dealing with that. We’ve got members of Congress who are dealing with that. We’ve got law enforcement leaders who are dealing with that. You know, in California, we had two law enforcement officials who were shot by an extremist group, allegedly, during the spring. Somebody is now facing federal charges for that. So I think there’s been a —

AMY GOODMAN: Boogaloo bois.

A.C. THOMPSON: Yeah, the boogaloo bois, exactly. So I think there’s been a level of violence and aggression towards public officials and government leaders that we have not seen in decades. And I don’t think we’ve reckoned with that at all. It’s a scary time to be a public leader.

Now, when you’re talking about Congress, this is a thing that we’re going to have to understand deeply, and we’re going to need serious, serious investigations about what was the role of sympathetic members of Congress in possibly fomenting or even enabling this insurrection, because I don’t think we’ve gotten to the bottom of that. We’ve heard names thrown out as potential members of Congress, from Arizona and Alabama, who may have aided and abetted these groups, but we don’t know yet. I think that’s a very concerning thing, as well. We also —

AMY GOODMAN: I mean, you have Mikie Sherrill — right? — the New Jersey congressmember, who said she — they called the sergeant-of-arms the day before, saying, “What are all these tour groups?” they now recognize were the people who were part of this insurrection being taken around. I mean, COVID times, they’re not doing tours there, so they could only get in through a congressmember or their staff.

A.C. THOMPSON: Exactly. And that is a big concern. I’ll tell you, from interviewing members of Congress, Republicans and Democrats, they said to us — you know, we had a Democratic congressman say to us, “I’m worried that we have empathizers and sympathizers within the ranks of the Capitol Police.” That was Rep. Andre Carson from the Indianapolis area. We had a GOP congresswoman, Nancy Mace, who said, “Look, I could tell, days before this happened, that it was going to be ugly, because I was getting relentless threats online and through all different channels. And I’m a Trump supporter, but I had said I’m not going to try to overturn this election. And so then I was the one targeted.” And it doesn’t sound like she got a lot of help with that. She sent her children home to South Carolina because she was scared for their lives. We have not even begun to grapple with how serious this problem is.

AMY GOODMAN: If you could very quickly — we only have a minute to go, but you detail in your pieces, and you just talked about, the Three Percenters, the Oath Keepers, boogaloo bois, Proud Boys. Tell us who some of these people are. Many people haven’t even heard of these groups before.

A.C. THOMPSON: Right. So, the boogaloo bois are an anti-government group who joined the Capitol insurrection, who have been tied to murders, kidnapping plots and the rest. The Proud Boys are an ultranationalist street gang or street-fighting group that have been at many of these events and seem to have been a key player here. The Oath Keepers and the Three Percenters are militia groups that sort of are traditional, longtime anti-government groups. And QAnon is the conspiracy theory followers who believe that there’s a vast cabal of globalists and satanists who are trying to take over America.

AMY GOODMAN: And finally, you have Ali Alexander, and this from The Washington Post, who organized the so-called Stop the Steal movement, who said he hatched the plan for this insurrection with the support of the three Republican lawmakers — you alluded to them, but — Congressmembers Andy Biggs of Arizona, Mo Brooks of Alabama, Paul Gosar of Arizona, all hard-line Trump supporters.

A.C. THOMPSON: Yeah. And that’s the thing. That’s going to be a really key investigative point there. And honestly, like, looking at Mr. Alexander and how he raised money and what his role in all this was, as well, is going to be a key thing to look at.

AMY GOODMAN: A.C. Thompson, we want to thank you so much for being with us. Keep up your great investigation. Staff reporter with ProPublica who’s covered the rise of right-wing extremist and white supremacist groups for years. We’ll link to your latest piece, “Members of Several Well-Known Hate Groups Identified at Capitol Riot.”


.

Footage from floor of Senate:

https://www.newyorker.com/news/video-de ... itol-siege
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 15988
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Presidential Election 2020

Postby kelley » Mon Jan 18, 2021 7:34 pm

excellent post and a brilliant sketch of the 1-2-3 factions at work in this op

that breakdown is not in the least 'abstract'

it's as real as it gets

meaning it has nothing to do with this prefab 'reality' shit of the past several years
kelley
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 8:49 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Presidential Election 2020

Postby Grizzly » Mon Jan 18, 2021 7:36 pm

https://www.buzzsprout.com/1116890/7351666-the-final-countdown

The Peasants Perspective
The Final Countdown! :starz:
“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4722
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Presidential Election 2020

Postby Marionumber1 » Mon Jan 18, 2021 7:49 pm

People are still "trusting the plan"? This is embarrassing... :lol:

And they're seriously mad at the prospect that Biden might...do something progressive for once and stop the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline? Why are these dopes worth listening to?
Marionumber1
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2017 12:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Presidential Election 2020

Postby JackRiddler » Mon Jan 18, 2021 8:59 pm

Marionumber1 » Mon Jan 18, 2021 6:49 pm wrote:People are still "trusting the plan"? This is embarrassing... :lol:

And they're seriously mad at the prospect that Biden might...do something progressive for once and stop the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline? Why are these dopes worth listening to?


Fascism is capitalism's fake-populist backup plan, whenever liberalism fails. (These things occur organically, following from initial premises and long histories, as well as planning based in understanding how the systems work.)
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 15988
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Presidential Election 2020

Postby BenDhyan » Sat Feb 06, 2021 12:04 am

Conspiracy theories?

Ben D
User avatar
BenDhyan
 
Posts: 880
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2017 8:11 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Presidential Election 2020

Postby DrEvil » Sat Feb 06, 2021 12:46 am

It's Mike Lindell, so yeah, conspiracy theories. He's a far-right religious nutjob who thinks antifa stormed the Capitol. His connection to reality is tenuous.

The above video also skips the epic disclaimer OAN (also far-right nutjobs) slapped on this infomercial.
https://twitter.com/bubbaprog/status/13 ... 0304197634
"I only read American. I want my fantasy pure." - Dave
User avatar
DrEvil
 
Posts: 3981
Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 1:37 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Presidential Election 2020

Postby BenDhyan » Sat Feb 06, 2021 2:21 am

^ What appears as persuasive is that from Mary Fanning at the 1:36:00 mark, though we don't know if it is made up?
Ben D
User avatar
BenDhyan
 
Posts: 880
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2017 8:11 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Presidential Election 2020

Postby Belligerent Savant » Sat Feb 06, 2021 1:52 pm

.

Anyone here still subscribing to the notion 2020 results were legitimate?

They are increasingly overt in the psych warfare/mindf#ckery.

Whatever the agenda may be for 2021+, it appears Trump was not the preferred option as PR for Empire.

Image
Image
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5267
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Presidential Election 2020

Postby Elvis » Sat Feb 06, 2021 2:48 pm

^^^^ Do I think Trump lost? Yes.

And, no link?
“The purpose of studying economics is not to acquire a set of ready-made answers to economic questions, but to learn how to avoid being deceived by economists.” ― Joan Robinson
User avatar
Elvis
 
Posts: 7434
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 7:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Presidential Election 2020

Postby JackRiddler » Sat Feb 06, 2021 2:56 pm

Belligerent Savant » Sat Feb 06, 2021 12:52 pm wrote:.

Anyone here still subscribing to the notion 2020 results were legitimate?

They are increasingly overt in the psych warfare/mindf#ckery.

Whatever the agenda may be for 2021+, it appears Trump was not the preferred option as PR for Empire.


No results were legitimate. Certainly not 2016, or 2000. Or 1968, 1972, 1980, 1984, 1988, 1992, 1996, 2004, or 2012. One can argue for 1976 and 2008 as being merely deceptive, rather than illegitimate. (Most of these elections were "legitimate" under the rules and as counts of which one of the pre-ordained duopoly miscreants got the better part of the vote, but otherwise vast jokes for a thousand reasons we will all be familiar with.)

That being said...

Yes, I don't just subscribe, but I am certain of the proposition that after the March 2020 primary coup, which was engineered against Sanders by the DNC & Co. to install their right-wing placeholder, this ancient walking miracle Biden-husk then got more real human votes, and more electoral votes, legally, "legitimately," than did Trump. In my opinion this was thanks not to anything the DNC did (they were set up to lose, as usual) but to Covid, the Covid-enabled reactions, the Depression, and a hellacious GOTV effort run largely by people on the actual, electoral left, who aren't mentioned in the highly selective TIME write-up cum PR piece for Catalist.

Said Trump, in turn, had been installed by the corporate media with a bit of naive DNC help as the RNC candidate in 2016,* and won then thanks to voter suppression and presumably state-level fraud, as well as the absurdist Electoral College system. ( * In truth, he certainly ran an excellent campaign of giving the Republican base exactly what they wanted to hear.) Live by the fix...

And this Trump is a member as well as representative of the smash-and-plunder segment of billionaire capital, while Biden is a representative of the self-styled "establishment" corporate segment of billionaire capital that prefers to disguise smash-and-plunder as a stable system of exploitation, as if anything about it is still stable. Both members and servants of different segments within the same ruling class. And they're both equally neoliberal, although one is multilateral about it and the other is straight nationalist-protectionist, in highly selective fashion that favors its own segments of capital. And they're both roughly equally imperialist and belligerent mass murderers, with some differences that may matter to Iranians or Cubans, depending on what decisions are made in the next few months.

And I don't just subscribe but witnessed in real time, as did all who aren't blinding themselves, how said Trump, seeing he was likely to lose, publicly initiated a back-up plan for a coup d'etat against the predictable election result months in advance. Is this worse than bombing Yemen, or starving Venezuela and Iran, or accelerating the burning of the planet, or mass incarceration, or all the rest of the routine as well as occasionally unexpected actions of the U.S. government under Trump and others? Really not the point! It was something bound to make everything worse in such an obvious way that even some of the billionaire beneficiaries of the Trump tax cuts cared enough to be mobilized against it, on a one-time basis.

Trump and his crew then failed to execute his open, public plan to overturn his predictable (if disturbingly close) election loss on the details. And then, just to underline for you just what he was about, he made a final move, as the executive of the government, of ordering a mob of his supporters (many of them organized by fascist groups), whom he had personally invited to a DC rally, to go shut down the legislature. An American-style coup enactment, in Washington. Many of them, in turn, wanted to murder as many legislators as they could get their hands on. Or at least they said so, and I don't see why they should be disbelieved, but you'll find excuses for them I'm sure. Was it ever going to work? Who cares, is that a fucking excuse? Some of you seem to think it was a fucking understandable rebellion by some random rabble. As if their leader was not the fucking president in office. Speaking to them. At a rally.

I read the TIME article in full yesterday. As did we all. (We being the kind of patsies who post here, instead of somewhere else.) I can't believe everyone falling for it as if it's some kind of revelation of a "conspiracy" (especially since it even uses the word). It describes shit that's done by the money in every election--legally, since money purchasing elections was made legal long ago. It omits the concurrent Republican money-machinations for Trump. It is basically an extremely self-important, self-hyping, extended PR piece for a DNC consultant, claiming he was the real, secret star of the election and savior of "democracy" in America. More contracts for him.

Meanwhile, in the minor schadenfreude department, at least the Lincoln Project is going down in beautiful flames.

.
We meet at the borders of our being, we dream something of each others reality. - Harvey of R.I.

To Justice my maker from on high did incline:
I am by virtue of its might divine,
The highest Wisdom and the first Love.

TopSecret WallSt. Iraq & more
User avatar
JackRiddler
 
Posts: 15988
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 2:59 pm
Location: New York City
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: US Presidential Election 2020

Postby Belligerent Savant » Sat Feb 06, 2021 2:57 pm

.
Elvis » Sat Feb 06, 2021 1:48 pm wrote:^^^^ Do I think Trump lost? Yes.

And, no link?


Trump may have lost regardless, or maybe not. Neither were viable options, in any event, so this is not about the merits of either criminal representative. But were steps taken to help assure an outcome? One can argue both sides committed fraud/shenanigans. I believe most of us acknowledge both parties are utterly compromised, and beyond the theatrics, partners in crime. (though there is usually disagreement about which party may be 'worse' or how much it matters over a short or long term, etc).

The piece is from TIME magazine, per the 'header' info in the screenshots. I'm sharing as I interpret the language used in the piece as a form of cryptic (or, blatant) acknowledgement of manipulation.


https://time.com/magazine/us/5936018/fe ... -no-5-u-s/

[Edited to remove initial unnecessary sentence]
Last edited by Belligerent Savant on Sat Feb 06, 2021 4:53 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5267
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests