Bill Gates is Seriously Dangerous

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Re: Bill Gates is Seriously Dangerous

Postby dada » Tue May 04, 2021 11:37 pm

I could be, if you really want me to be.

I was thinking about when alice is talking to humpty dumpty, and says, "the question is, whether you can make words mean so many different things.” And Humpty Dumpty replies, "The question is, which is to be master—that’s all.”

As I figure it, this is not very different than what I'm talking about in the posts above that griz is bored with. The questions are an invitation to the reader to answer one way or another. A reader who knows there is no question as to how words are made to mean things, doesn't take the invitation.

There is "say what you mean," and "mean what you say." When the two come together, the words say exactly what they mean, and mean exactly what they say. But in a looking glass world, it's very hard to do.
Both his words and manner of speech seemed at first totally unfamiliar to me, and yet somehow they stirred memories - as an actor might be stirred by the forgotten lines of some role he had played far away and long ago.
User avatar
dada
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:08 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bill Gates is Seriously Dangerous

Postby dada » Wed May 05, 2021 1:18 am

Also thinking about how a newpaper doesn't stay afloat by selling papers to consumers, but selling consumer distribution to advertisers. Fairly easy concept to grasp.

On the Internet, such as it is, we'd say it's a social media model. Anyway I was thinking mass production creates its consumers. I think this creation is also pretty well understood. Mass production must create consumer need for its products. So you know, welcome to the machine.

And I wonder if when the consumer tuned in to mass production culture reads good old fashioned thinking in words of unaffiliated agency, it does not compute. Looks like spam, garbage.
Both his words and manner of speech seemed at first totally unfamiliar to me, and yet somehow they stirred memories - as an actor might be stirred by the forgotten lines of some role he had played far away and long ago.
User avatar
dada
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:08 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bill Gates is Seriously Dangerous

Postby conniption » Fri May 07, 2021 8:03 pm

Who Gets Custody of the Gates Foundation? - #NewWorldNextWeek​

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuy84RTrXdc

Also on odysee:
https://odysee.com/@corbettreport:0/nwnw20210506:6


•May 6, 2021
Corbett Report Extras

Welcome to New World Next Week - the video series from Corbett Report and Media Monarchy that covers some of the most important developments in open source intelligence news. This week:

Story #1: How Bill And Melinda Plan To Divide Their $150 Billion Fortune
https://www.zerohedge.com/technology/...​
"I Have Changed My Mind And Do Not Want A Divorce From This Amazing Handsome Man," Says Glossy-Eyed Melinda Gates After Receiving Vaccine
https://twitter.com/thebabylonbee/sta...​
Image: Bill and Rachel - It's a Match!
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachment...​
Image: When You're Newly Single And Lost Your Wingman
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachment...​
Is Melinda Divorcing Bill Gates Over Jeffrey Epstein?
https://banned.video/watch?id=6091ed1...​
VH1's "Fabulous Life of Billion Dollar Wall Street Ballers" Fawns Over Jeffrey Epstein
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GO2cl...​
Who Is Bill Gates?
https://www.corbettreport.com/gates/
Cascade Transfers $1.8 Billion of Equities to Melinda Gates
https://archive.is/XmMCC
Bill Gates, China, 23andMe, And Your DNA
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.c...​

Story #2: Why Is A Communist Party Member Shaping UK’s Lockdown Policy?
https://www.theamericanconservative.c...​
Fellow Marxists Searched Prof. Susan Michie's Baby's Pram for Propaganda
https://archive.is/wYZwq
Michie, Big Fan of Lockdowns, Was Once Known As "Stalin's Nanny"
https://archive.is/7nL71
Susan Michie on Behavioral Change
https://www.socialsciencespace.com/20...​
How To Deal With Vocal Vaccine Deniers – #PropagandaWatch​
https://www.corbettreport.com/how-to-...​
What's In Your Head? Just Like In Nolan's 'Inception', Brain Tech Can Hack Your Mind; 'Neuro-Rights' Can Keep You Safe
https://archive.is/brS2U

Story #3: Kansas City's Sean Culkin Becomes 1st NFL Player to Convert Entire Salary to Bitcoin
https://archive.is/wiLIV
"I fully believe Bitcoin is the future of finance..."
https://twitter.com/culkin22/status/1...​
Is There A Chance To Unite The Pro And Anti Blockchain Crowds?
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.c..
.
conniption
 
Posts: 2480
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 10:01 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bill Gates is Seriously Dangerous

Postby dada » Sat May 08, 2021 11:57 am

With no comment from the sharer in the act of resharing media, interaction with the shared content can only be interaction with the dead society of mass consumer culture itself.

That the media was reshared is a clear invitation for reader interaction, the invitation to join the silent resharer under their garden plot, waiting out life together in quiet cemetary safety.

Once "crossing over" the coffin box of the reshare, the reader can only converse with shadows, and to address the ghostly sharer is pointless, since there is no one and nothing really there to address.
Both his words and manner of speech seemed at first totally unfamiliar to me, and yet somehow they stirred memories - as an actor might be stirred by the forgotten lines of some role he had played far away and long ago.
User avatar
dada
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:08 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bill Gates is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Belligerent Savant » Sat May 08, 2021 12:40 pm

.

The latest grist for the mill. Pearl clutching!

Melinda was so furious she hung around another ~8 yrs. And of course will accept all the terms of the divorce settlement.

https://www.businessinsider.com/melinda ... ast-2021-5

Melinda Gates was upset and uncomfortable after she and Bill Gates met with Jeffrey Epstein, The Daily Beast reports

A meeting between the Gateses and Jeffrey Epstein in 2013 reportedly left Melinda Gates upset.

The Daily Beast reported Thursday that she warned her husband about his relationship with Epstein.

The New York Times had reported that Bill Gates and Epstein met several times from 2011 to 2013.

A meeting between Bill and Melinda Gates and Jeffrey Epstein in 2013 left Melinda Gates upset at the relationship between her husband and the financier, The Daily Beast reported Thursday.

With the Gateses now splitting up, sources told the outlet that Bill Gates' friendship with Epstein — who had already pleaded guilty to soliciting an underage girl in 2008 when the two first connected in 2011 —"still haunts" Melinda Gates.

According to the outlet, the couple met with Epstein in New York City at his Upper East Side mansion in September 2013. Sources told The Daily Beast that soon after the meeting, Melinda Gates told friends of her discomfort during the encounter. Several people close to the couple reportedly said she was "furious" over her husband's relationship with Epstein.

User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5214
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bill Gates is Seriously Dangerous

Postby dada » Sat May 08, 2021 1:46 pm

As the act of resharing is an invitation to "explore the contents of the box," the silent sharer can only be a ghostly, pointing hand. Not at the "writing on the wall," but at the host of beckoning shadows in the grave.
Both his words and manner of speech seemed at first totally unfamiliar to me, and yet somehow they stirred memories - as an actor might be stirred by the forgotten lines of some role he had played far away and long ago.
User avatar
dada
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:08 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bill Gates is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Belligerent Savant » Sat May 08, 2021 3:19 pm

.

Sometimes I draft commentary; other times I share articles that may be of note (which in turn can be ignored by the reader, or perhaps, it may inspire commentary). Such is the way of a forum such as this. Wholesale "copypasta" and/or repeated re-creation of media without commentary is frowned upon here. In fact, I was vocal in opposition of this when it was conducted egregiously in the past by other members (who are no longer with us, at least not for the last ~year or so).

Your reply reads to me as another attempt at derailing for what is ostensibly some form of meta commentary.
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5214
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bill Gates is Seriously Dangerous

Postby dada » Sat May 08, 2021 3:31 pm

In narratives of elite control, the billionaires capture mass consumer attention through the technocratic media wizardry of movie star promotion.

The mass consumer, having failed to grasp the analysis surrounding the reshared media, can therefore not engage with the analysis on pain of instant narrative collapse.

The surrounding analysis for the mass consumer is then always the looming presence of the narrative collapser, and yet in the light of the surrounding analysis, the mass consumer's output is seen for what it is, celebrity gossip on the checkout line.
Both his words and manner of speech seemed at first totally unfamiliar to me, and yet somehow they stirred memories - as an actor might be stirred by the forgotten lines of some role he had played far away and long ago.
User avatar
dada
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:08 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bill Gates is Seriously Dangerous

Postby dada » Sat May 08, 2021 4:13 pm

So I guess what I'm saying here is that if you can't engage with what I'm saying other than through the always funnily ironic "efforts at dismissal," and personal character attacks, you still might notice that now I see no reason to engage with your output in those same ways, engaging instead in ways that are frame of reference-building and transformative.
Both his words and manner of speech seemed at first totally unfamiliar to me, and yet somehow they stirred memories - as an actor might be stirred by the forgotten lines of some role he had played far away and long ago.
User avatar
dada
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:08 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bill Gates is Seriously Dangerous

Postby dada » Sat May 08, 2021 5:34 pm

Gets me thinking about framing, as in "framing the debate." "Moving the goalposts," in popular sports metaphor. Then the arguments start over where the frame or goalposts should be.

As if the goalposts just wandered out of nowhere with no place to go, and didn't have the usual spot where goalposts always go.

And framing the debate, then is always reframing. Putting the debate back, into its original frame, is neither framing nor reframing.

Frame of reference-buildng might be rebuiliding, then. Not in saying in old ways and new ways, but in rare and unique ways. So like, the first frame of reference-building, rebuilt on the ruins of mass production consumer-frame of reference.
Both his words and manner of speech seemed at first totally unfamiliar to me, and yet somehow they stirred memories - as an actor might be stirred by the forgotten lines of some role he had played far away and long ago.
User avatar
dada
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:08 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bill Gates is Seriously Dangerous

Postby dada » Sat May 08, 2021 6:02 pm

The thing being that when someone brings you what they perceive will be "bad news," whether secretly sorrowfully or gleefully, they always say "don't shoot the messsenger," referring to the pen that authored the words. Forgetting that they themselves are the messenger, and everything about the message, from the materials to the handwriting to the wax seal are fair game.
Both his words and manner of speech seemed at first totally unfamiliar to me, and yet somehow they stirred memories - as an actor might be stirred by the forgotten lines of some role he had played far away and long ago.
User avatar
dada
 
Posts: 2600
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2007 12:08 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bill Gates is Seriously Dangerous

Postby stickdog99 » Fri Jul 02, 2021 5:56 pm

https://trialsitenews.com/gates-earns-1 ... over-550m/

Gates Earns 10X on BioNTech (developer of Pfizers' mRNA COViD-19 "vaccine:) in Just Two Years

$55 Million Investment Now Over $550 million

...

Not a Conspiracy

That Gates has earned 10X on the foundation’s money isn’t the result of some nefarious, dark-order orchestrated conspiracy but rather part of a methodical, systematic investment thesis dedicated to monetizing public health. Now, all of this, of course, must unfold in an ethical and lawful manner. As society moves toward a new, heretofore not contemplated reality where billionaires and powerful private equity intermediaries’ movements can shape life as we know it, the endpoints can certainly feel like planned. Yet when combining regulatory capture and evolving corporate crony capitalism (as opposed to dynamic free markets) and well, it’s easy to see how some could mistakenly point to a “conspiracy” when it’s really just representative of an unfolding confluence of interests, marked by a series of coincidences.
stickdog99
 
Posts: 6302
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 5:42 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bill Gates is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Belligerent Savant » Wed Jul 07, 2021 12:08 pm

.

https://twitter.com/cordeliers/status/1 ... 18788?s=20
@cordeliers

Gates invests $49 million in sinister new contraceptive tech. You won't be able to tell from today's news coverage or press releases, but it's wirelessly controlled birth control operated by an implantable microchip.



https://www.marketwatch.com/story/dare- ... 2021-07-07
Dare Bioscience stock rockets after new $49 million grant from Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Published: July 7, 2021 at 8:20 a.m. ET

Shares of Dare Bioscience Inc. DARE, 31.58% rocketed 63.1% in very active premarket trading Wednesday, after the California-based health care company said it was awarded a new grant of up to $48.95 million from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Trading volume spiked up to 18.1 million shares, compared with the full-day average of about 3.7 million shares. The new grant is to support the development and preclinical activities to advance Dare's investigational reversible contraceptive, DARE-LARC1, toward testing in humans. As part of the grant agreement, Dare agreed to make DARE-LARC1 and any other products available at an affordable price to people in developing countries, or in support of the U.S. educational system and public libraries. The stock has lost 10.6% over the past three months through Tuesday, while the iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF IBB, -1.09% has gained 9.4% and the S&P 500 SPX, 0.29% has tacked on 6.5%.




Daré to Add Microchip-Based Birth Control to Women’s Health Portfolio

Advancing new forms of birth control is a central focus at Daré Bioscience (NASDAQ: DARE), a San Diego-based biopharma company that’s built a pipeline of experimental devices and treatments tailored for women’s health.

This week it announced plans to add another contraceptive contender to its lineup with an agreement to acquire Microchips Biotech, an MIT spinout that—with the backing of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and others—has been working to design an implant for drug delivery that could be controlled wirelessly.

Co-founded by researchers Bob Langer and Michael Cima, the company has received nearly $18 million from the Gates Foundation to design a microchip-based implant for the purposes of birth control. (It’s eligible for up to $2.5 million more next year from the organization to further the program, according to Daré Bio.)

Backed by venture investors, too, including Polaris Partners and Medtronic, Microchips also worked on applications for other conditions for which care involves regular injections or frequent dosing; it has vetted the tech in patients with osteoporosis.

In recent years Daré Bio CEO Sabrina Martucci Johnson (pictured above) and her team have been watching the work being done at Microchips as it relates to women’s contraception, she told Xconomy in a phone interview.

As envisioned by Microchips, the contraceptive implant would be gridded with tiny compartments, each containing a small dose of medication—in this case, the hormone levonorgestrel—to be released on a predetermined schedule.

Patients would be able to halt and resume the dosing regimen as needed. That would give the product an advantage over existing methods of contraception because of the increased control it would give for family planning purposes, Johnson says.


“It gives the woman the opportunity to have an effective, long-acting, reversible contraceptive for a meaningful period of time that she chooses, but also gives her a very straight-forward ability to reverse it on demand,” she says. “All you’re basically doing is controlling whether those reservoirs open and release product, or whether they stay closed and don’t release anything, and that’s not something you’re able to do right now with any of the current implant technologies.”

https://xconomy.com/san-diego/2019/11/1 ... portfolio/
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5214
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bill Gates is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Grizzly » Fri Jul 09, 2021 10:25 am

^^^

Burn this motherfucker!
“The more we do to you, the less you seem to believe we are doing it.”

― Joseph mengele
User avatar
Grizzly
 
Posts: 4722
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2011 4:15 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Bill Gates is Seriously Dangerous

Postby Belligerent Savant » Tue Nov 30, 2021 3:51 pm

.

The question posed and subsequent response at the ~13min mark is interesting/telling:


November 17, 2021

Bill Gates, the billionaire co-founder of Microsoft Corp, discusses the global fight against Covid-19 and the importance of pandemic preparedness. He speaks with John Micklethwait at the Bloomberg New Economy Forum.



From the comments:
Jason Goodin
11 days ago

Why is this guy questioning a software engineer like he’s God or a doctor or a health expert? Just amazing

kevin joseph
11 days ago

not amazing. ALARMING. The gold rule..he who has the gold makes the rule.


M Rivera
11 days ago

I don't even think he is a legit software engineer. His first operating system was bought and slightly tweaked, that became windows.


Marvin Sabado
8 days ago

He paid that guy to ask him a question. To make an illusion that he is a source of important wisdom or knowledge. Correction, he is not a software engineer. He just stole ideas from Steve Jobs. What he is good at is false advertising that is the only thing he is good at. If he sees something profitable. He would hire people who would reverse engineer the profitable thing and then he would make a replica and would give it another name and would call it his invention... This fool is not a software engineer..same as what he did with Xbox... Stealing the concept from the ultimate, irreplaceable PlayStation Console which is far way more superior than whatever mediocre trash this fool comes up with


PIPPO-10
8 hours ago

That's where you're mistaken, he's not a software engineer, he's a business man. I kept making that mistake too.
User avatar
Belligerent Savant
 
Posts: 5214
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: North Atlantic.
Blog: View Blog (0)

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 48 guests