I believe this merits a thread on its own, as this topic -- in the months/years ahead -- will cover areas above and beyond the near-term COVID-related hysterics.
As with anything, caveat lector.
A few relevant cross-posts and a primer:
Belligerent Savant » Fri Mar 12, 2021 8:20 am wrote:.
From the link shared by stickdog ... Re: mRNA vaccines:
...we’ve been told in no uncertain terms that it would be impossible for the mRNA in a vaccine to become integrated into our DNA, simply because “RNA doesn’t work that way.” Well, this current research which was released not too long after my original article demonstrates that yes, indeed, “RNA does work that way”. In my original article, I spelled out this exact molecular pathway.
Specifically, a new study by MIT and Harvard scientists demonstrates that segments of the RNA from the coronavirus itself are most likely becoming a permanent fixture in human DNA. (study linked below). This was once thought near impossible, for the same reasons which are presented to assure us that an RNA vaccine could accomplish no such feat. Against the tides of current biological dogma, these researchers found that the genetic segments of this RNA virus are more than likely making their way into our genome. They also found that the exact pathway that I laid out in in my original article is more than likely the pathway being used (retrotransposon, and in particular a LINE-1 element) for this retro-integration to occur.
And, unlike my previous blog where I hypothesize that such an occurrence would be extremely rare (mainly because I was attempting to temper expectations more conservatively due to the lack of empirical evidence), it appears that this integration of viral RNA segments into our DNA is not as rare as I initially hypothesized. It’s difficult for me to put a number on the probability due to data limitations present in the paper, but based on the frequency they were able to measure this phenomenon in both petri dishes and COVID patients, the probability is much greater than I initially anticipated. Due to this current research, I now place this risk as a more probable event than my original estimation.
To be fair, this study didn’t show that the RNA from the current vaccines is being integrated into our DNA. However, they did show, quite convincingly, that there exists a viable cellular pathway whereby snippets of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA could become integrated into our genomic DNA. In my opinion, more research is needed to both corroborate these findings, and to close some gaps.
That being said, this data can be used to make a conjecture as to whether the RNA present in an RNA vaccine could potentially alter human DNA. This is because an mRNA vaccine consists of snippets of the viral RNA from the genome of SARS-CoV-2; in particular, the current mRNA vaccines harbor stabilized mRNA which encodes the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, which is the protein that enables the virus to bind to cell-surface receptors and infect our cells.
This was thought near impossible. Based on this ground-breaking study, I would hope that the highly presumptuous claim that such a scenario is impossible will find its way to the trash bin labeled: “Things We Were Absolutely and Unequivocally Certain Couldn’t Happen Which Actually Happened”; although, I have a suspicious feeling that the importance of this study will be minimized in quick order with reports from experts who attempt to poke holes in their work. It’s important to add that this paper is a pre-print that is not peer-reviewed yet; but I went through all of the data, methods, and results, and I see very little wrong with the paper, and some gaps that need closing- but, at least from the standpoint of being able to answer the question: can RNA from the coronavirus use existing cellular pathways to integrate permanently into our DNA? From that perspective, their paper is rock-solid. Also, please take note that these are respected scientists from MIT and Harvard.
Quoting from their paper:
“In support of this hypothesis, we found chimeric transcripts consisting of viral fused to cellular sequences in published data sets of SARS-CoV-2 infected cultured cells and primary cells of patients, consistent with the transcription of viral sequences integrated into the genome. To experimentally corroborate the possibility of viral retro-integration, we describe evidence that SARS-CoV-2 RNAs can be reverse transcribed in human cells by reverse transcriptase (RT) from LINE-1 elements or by HIV-1 RT, and that these DNA sequences can be integrated into the cell genome and subsequently be transcribed. Human endogenous LINE-1 expression was induced upon SARS-CoV-2 infection or by cytokine exposure in cultured cells, suggesting a molecular mechanism for SARS-CoV-2 retro-integration in patients. This novel feature of SARS-CoV-2 infection may explain why patients can continue to produce viral RNA after recovery and suggests a new aspect of RNA virus replication.”
Why did these researchers bother to investigate whether viral RNA could become hardwired into our genomic DNA? It turns out their motive had nothing to do with mRNA vaccines. The researchers were puzzled by the fact that there is a respectable number of people who are testing positive for COVID-19 by PCR long after the infection was gone. It was also shown that these people were not reinfected. The authors sought to answer how a PCR test is able to detect segments of viral RNA when the virus is presumably absent from a person’s body. They hypothesized that somehow segments of the viral RNA were being copied into DNA and then integrated permanently into the DNA of somatic cells. This would allow these cells to continuously churn out pieces of viral RNA that would be detected in a PCR test, even though no active infection existed. Through their experiments, they did not find full-length viral RNA integrated into genomic DNA; rather, they found smaller segments of the viral DNA, mostly representing the nucleocapsid (N) protein of the virus, although other viral segments were found integrated into human DNA at a lower frequency.
In this paper, they demonstrate that:
1) Segments of SARS-CoV-2 Viral RNA can become integrated into human genomic DNA.
2) This newly acquired viral sequence is not silent, meaning that these genetically modified regions of genomic DNA are transcriptionally active (DNA is being converted back into RNA).
3) Segments of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA retro-integrated into human genomic DNA in cell culture. This retro-integration into genomic DNA of COVID-19 patients is also implied indirectly from the detection of chimeric RNA transcripts in cells derived from COVID-19 patients. Although their RNAseq data suggests that genomic alteration is taking place in COVID-19 patients, to prove this point conclusively, PCR, DNA sequencing, or Southern Blot should be carried out on purified genomic DNA of COVID-19 patients to prove this point conclusively. This is a gap that needs to be closed in the research. The in vitro data in human cell lines, however, is air tight.
4) This viral retro-integration of RNA into DNA can be induced by endogenous LINE-1 retrotransposons, which produce an active reverse transcriptase (RT) that converts RNA into DNA. (All humans have multiple copies of LINE-1 retrotransposons residing in their genome.). The frequency of retro-integration of viral RNA into DNA is positively correlated with LINE-1 expression levels in the cell.
5) These LINE-1 retrotransposons can be activated by viral infection with SARS-CoV-2, or cytokine exposure to cells, and this increases the probability of retro-integration.
Instead of going through all of their results in detail (you can do that if you like by reading their paper linked below), I will answer the big question on everyone’s mind – If the virus is able to accomplish this, then why should I care if the vaccine does the same thing?
Well, first let’s just address the big elephant in the room first. First, you should care because, “THEY TOLD YOU THAT THIS WAS IMPOSSIBLE AND TO JUST SHUT UP AND TAKE THE VACCINE.” These pathways that I hypothesized (and these researchers verified with their experiments) are not unknown to people who understand molecular biology at a deeper level. This is not hidden knowledge which is only available to the initiated. I can assure you that the people who are developing the vaccines are people who understand molecular biology at a very sophisticated level. So, why didn’t they discover this, or even ask this question, or even do some experiments to rule it out? Instead, they just used superficially simplistic biology 101 as a smoke screen to tell you that RNA doesn’t convert into DNA. This is utterly disingenuous, and this lack of candor is what motivated me to write my original article. They could have figured this out easily.
Second, there’s a big difference between the scenario where people randomly, and unwittingly, have their genetics monkeyed with because they were exposed to the coronavirus, and the scenario where we willfully vaccinate billions of people while telling them this isn’t happening. Wouldn’t you agree? What is the logic in saying, “Well, this bad thing may or may not happen to you, so we’re going to remove the mystery and ensure that it happens to everyone.”? In my best estimate, this is an ethical decision that you ought to make, not them.
Third, the RNA in the vaccine is a different animal than the RNA produced by the virus. The RNA in the vaccine is artificially engineered. First, it is engineered to stay around in your cells for a much longer time than usual (RNA is naturally unstable and degrades quickly in the cell). Second, it is engineered such that it is efficient at being translated into protein (they accomplish this by codon optimization). Increasing the stability of the RNA increases the probability that it will become integrated into your DNA; and, increasing the translation efficiency increases the amount of protein translated from the RNA if it does happen to become incorporated into your DNA in a transcriptionally active region of your genome. Theoretically, this means that whatever negative effects are associated with the natural process of viral RNA/DNA integration, these negative effects could be more frequent and more pronounced with the vaccine when compared to the natural virus.
As a side note, these researchers found that the genetic information for the nucleocapsid “N” protein was, by far, the largest culprit for being permanently integrated into human DNA (because this RNA is more abundant when the virus replicates in our cells). The vaccine, on the other hand, contains RNA that encodes the Spike (S) protein. Therefore, if the mRNA from the vaccine (or subsegments thereof) were to make its way into a transcriptionally-active region of our genome through a retro-integration process, it will cause our cells to produce an over-abundance of Spike protein, rather than N protein. Our immune system does make antibodies to both N and S proteins, but it is the Spike protein which is the prime target for our immune system because it exists on the outside of the virus. If our cells become permanent (rather than temporary) Spike Protein producing factories due to permanent alteration of our genomic DNA, this could lead to serious autoimmune problems. I would imagine that autoimmunity profiles arising from such a scenario would be differentiated based on order of events (i.e., whether or not someone is vaccinated before or after exposure to coronavirus).
Again, this is a theoretical exercise I am presenting for consideration. I am not making the claim that an mRNA vaccine will permanently alter your genomic DNA, and I didn’t make this claim in my first article, although it appears that troll sites made the fallacious claim that I did. I simply asked the question, and provided hypothetical, plausible molecular pathways by which such an event could occur. I believe this current research validates that this is at least plausible, and most likely probable. It most certainly deserves closer inspection and testing to rule this possibility out, and I would hope that a rigorous and comprehensive test program would be instituted with the same enthusiasm that propelled the vaccine haphazardly through the normal safety checkpoints.
Obviously, even given this information, people are still free to get vaccinated, and will do so according to the overall balance of risks and rewards that they perceive in their mind. The purpose of my article is to make sure you can make that assessment fairly by possessing all potential risks and rewards, rather than an incomplete set. For something as important as this, you should not be operating in the dark.
Belligerent Savant » Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:50 pm wrote:.
Breadcrumbs Re: vaccine ... --Jay Hurst
@JayHurs70120732
·
1h
Replying to
@bridgietherease
A family member has just required open heart surgery for a blood clot days after being vaccinated. I can't honestly argue there is a causal relationship. The fact remains I decided long ago not to be vaccinated unnecessarily for a virus I've never been afraid of catching.Thomas Hearns Says Marvin Hagler Was ‘In ICU Fighting The After Effects Of The Vaccine’
Boxing legend "Marvelous" Marvin Hagler died Saturday. No cause of death was immediately announced.
https://www.worldboxingnews.net/2021/03 ... s-vaccine/
There's also Hank Aaron's recent death, shortly after taking the 'vaccine', but most mainstream press will be quick to dismiss any such connections.
Many that blindly accept the official Covid death tallies will at the same time refuse to consider the timing of these recent deaths, occurring shortly after 'vaccination'. Will there be any sober assessment of deaths occurring shortly after inoculation? There will always be plausible deniability.
AND:More European nations suspend use of AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine
More European countries have suspended the use of the Covid-19 vaccine developed by AstraZeneca and University of Oxford following reports of several suspected deaths from clotting after inoculationMore countries suspend AstraZeneca vaccinations over blood clot fears: What we know so far
Thailand on Friday became the first Asian country to halt the use of the jab over safety concerns, shortly after Denmark announced a two-week pause to its nationwide rollout after reports of blood clots and one death.
CNBC and Business Standard headlines.
...
Good links embedded (and at the bottom of the article) at this source:
https://auticulture.com/the-war-on-huma ... ugenocide/
The War on Human Sentience: 2021 ~ the Year Humanity Consented to Euthanized Eugenocide?
A friend of a friend recently took the Pfizer vaccine. When they were questioned on the wisdom of their decision, they replied that they felt they had made an intelligent, adult decision. Let’s see if that’s true.
From July, 2020:From mRNA vaccines entering clinical trials, to peptide-based vaccines and using molecular farming to scale vaccine production, the COVID-19 pandemic is pushing new and emerging nanotechnologies into the frontlines and the headlines. . . . Steinmetz is leading a National Science Foundation-funded effort to develop – using a plant virus – a stable, easy to manufacture COVID-19 vaccine patch that can be shipped around the world and painlessly self-administered by patients. Both the vaccine itself and the microneedle patch delivery platform rely on nanotechnology. This vaccine falls into the peptide-based approach described below.
“From a vaccine technology development point of view, this is an exciting time and novel technologies and approaches are poised to make a clinical impact for the first time. For example, to date, no mRNA vaccine has been clinically approved, yet Moderna’s [an American pharmaceutical and biotechnology company] mRNA vaccine technology for COVID-19 is making headways and was the first vaccine to enter clinical testing in the US.”
As of June 1, there are 157 COVID-19 vaccine candidates in development, with 12 in clinical trials.
“. . . as devastating as COVID-19 is, it may serve as an impetus for the scientific community, funding bodies, and stakeholders to put more focused efforts toward development of platform technologies to prepare nations for readiness for future pandemics,” Steinmetz wrote.
As crisis looms, opportunity knocks for nanotechs. . . Flash-forward to November 9, 2020:The pharma giant Pfizer and its German partner, BioNTech, announced in a company press release a Covid19 vaccine that was “90% effective.” The EU promptly announced it had purchased 300 million doses of the costly new vaccine. Meanwhile Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, sold 62% of his stock in Pfizer on the day the proposed vaccine trials were announced. He made millions on the deal, done via “a special option” in August to avoid charges of insider trading, and timed it just after the US elections and the mainstream media declared Joe Biden President-elect (i.e., during a media shitstorm when everyone was distracted).
As F.William Engdahl wrote in Nov, 2020:Pfizer, famous for its Viagra and other drugs, has partnered with a small Mainz, Germany company, BioNTech, which has developed the radical mRNA technique used to produce the new corona vaccine. BioNTech was only founded in 2008. BioNTech signed an agreement with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in September, 2019, just before announcement in Wuhan China of the Novel Coronavirus and just before BioNTech made its stock market debut. The agreement involved cooperation on developing new mRNA techniques to treat cancer and HIV. Curiously that press release, “The Gates Foundation sees BioNTech potential to ‘dramatically reduce global HIV and tuberculosis’” 05. September 2019, has now been deleted.
BioNTech also has an agreement with one of the largest drug producers in China, Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd (“Fosun Pharma”) to develop a version of its mRNA vaccine for novel coronavirus for the Chinese market. . . . This means that the same German biotech company is behind the covid vaccines being rushed out in China as well as the USA and EU. . . . Both US and EU authorities and presumably also Chinese, waived the standard animal tests using ferrets or mice and have gone straight to human “guinea pigs.” Human tests began in late July and early August. Three months is unheard of for testing a new vaccine. Several years is the norm. . . . Vaccine makers all have legal indemnity, meaning they can’t be sued if people die or are maimed from the new vaccine. But the most alarming fact about the new Pfizer-BioNTech gene edited vaccine is that the gene edited mRNA for human vaccine application has never before been approved. Notably, two year peer reviewed tests with mice fed genetically modified corn sprayed with Monsanto glyphosate-rich Roundup first showed cancer tumors after nine months as well as liver and other organ damage. Earlier Monsanto company tests ended at three months and claimed no harm. A similar situation exists with the gene edited mRNA vaccines that are being rushed out after less than 90 days human tests.
Dr. Michael Yeadon (who has a degree in Biochemistry & Toxicology & a research-based PhD in pharmacology, spent 32 years working in pharmaceutical R&D, and was a VP at Pfizer) has stated, “If any such vaccine is approved for use under any circumstances that are not EXPLICITLY experimental, I believe that recipients are being misled to a criminal extent. This is because there are precisely zero human volunteers for . . . whom there could possibly be more than a few months past-dose safety information.”
Despite the fact the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine is experimental and therefore guaranteed unsafe, it has at date of writing been given to over a hundred million humans, with hundreds of millions more due to receive the jab in the next few months.
F.William Engdahl continues:The experimental technology is based on a rather new gene manipulation known as gene editing. In a major article in the 2018 New York Council on Foreign Relations magazine, Foreign Affairs, Bill Gates effusively promoted the novel gene editing CRISPR technology as being able to “transform global development.” He noted that his Gates Foundation had been financing gene editing developments for vaccines and other applications for a decade.
Dr. Romeo Quijano, retired professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology at the College of Medicine, University of the Philippines Manila, has warned ofthe danger that the vaccine might actually “enhance” the pathogenicity of the virus, or make it more aggressive possibly due to antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), as what happened with previous studies on test vaccines in animals. If that should happen in a major human trial the outcome could be disastrous. This serious adverse effect may not even be detected by a clinical trial especially in highly biased clinical trials laden with conflicts of interest involving vaccine companies. Even when a serious adverse event is detected, this is usually swept under the rug.”
Quijano writes in the extensively documented article, “among other dangers, the virus-vectored vaccines could undergo recombination with naturally occurring viruses and produce hybrid viruses that could have undesirable properties affecting transmission or virulence. The . . . possible outcomes of recombination are practically impossible to quantify accurately given existing tools and knowledge. The risks, however, are real, as exemplified by the emergence of mutant types of viruses, enhanced pathogenicity and unexpected serious adverse events (including death) following haphazard mass vaccination campaigns and previous failed attempts to develop chimeric vaccines using genetic engineering technology.”
Source: https://journal-neo.org/2020/11/13/what ... s-vaccine/
Faith-Based Denials from the Science Alliance
December 2020:Former Pfizer head of respiratory research, Dr. Michael Yeadon, and the former head of the public health department, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, have filed a petition for a stay of action asking the European Medicine Agency to suspend phase III of the clinical trials for Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and all other clinical trials. They cite “significant” safety concerns and request all trials are halted until specific criteria outlined in their stay action is met which will ensure efficiency and safety.
Yeadon and Wodarg claim that it’s not only possible the vaccine could provoke serious unwanted antibody and immune reactions, but it must be “absolutely ruled out” that the vaccine would not render women infertile by disrupting their placentas, should they become pregnant.
Source: https://www.blacklistednews.com/article ... cause.html
Snopes has of course denied this (though not that Yeadon said it). For every awkward fact presented around the untested nature (and hence lack of safety) of the Pfizer implant, there are a hundred denials. Yet no one can deny the fact that it has not been tested and hence is provably unsafe. The denials are faith- not fact-based, though it seems that many of the people who make them ~ those sincerely intended at least ~ are unaware that they are using religio-magical thinking (a.k.a. doublethink) to maintain their opinions. They sincerely believe they have corporate-medical science on their side. Unfounded and ideologically-driven opinion has truly trumped arguments, evidence, facts, and, the last and most critical casualty in this war on human sentience, truth.
In case anyone says this post isn’t presenting a balanced perspective, here’s Alliance for Science (Cornell), who are fighting on the front line of the pro-mRNA movement (Dec 2021, “Yes, some COVID vaccines use genetic engineering. Get over it“):We’re going right to the heart of the matter. So no, COVID-19 vaccines aren’t delivery vehicles for government microchips. They aren’t tainted by material from aborted fetuses. And they won’t turn us into GMOs — though some of them do use genetic engineering, and all of them use genetics more broadly. We think this is way cool — something to celebrate, not shy away from. So, we’re doing the deep reveal on exactly how genetics and biotechnology have been a central component of the vaccine effort. Because we know the conspiracists don’t care about evidence, anyway. First up: mRNA. It won’t reprogram your brain. But it does reprogram some of your cells, in a manner of speaking. And that’s not a defect — it’s intentional.
January 2021:Norway said Covid-19 vaccines may be too risky for the very old and terminally ill, the most cautious statement yet from a European health authority as countries assess the real-world side effects of the first shots to gain approval.
Norwegian officials said 23 people had died in the country a short time after receiving their first dose of the vaccine. Of those deaths, 13 have been autopsied, with the results suggesting that common side effects may have contributed to severe reactions in frail, elderly people, according to the Norwegian Medicines Agency.
“For those with the most severe frailty, even relatively mild vaccine side effects can have serious consequences,” the Norwegian Institute of Public Health said. “For those who have a very short remaining life span anyway, the benefit of the vaccine may be marginal or irrelevant.”
But don’t worry:“the number of incidents so far is not alarming, and in line with expectations,” Pfizer said.
Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... -childcare
Revenge of the Brain-Eaters
So who needs conspiracy-theorists when you have a growing number of alarmed medical, biological, and technical professionals vainly trying to sound the alarm? Not that it matters, since Science, big S, no longer cares about facts but only bottom dollar. This is British Columbia-based Chris Shaw, Ph.D, Specialist in Neuroplasticity and Neuropathology:“The mRNA lipid-coated PEG-construct––by Moderna’s own study––does not stay localized but spreads throughout the body, including the brain. Found in animal studies in bone marrow, brain, lymph nodes, heart, kidneys liver, lungs, etc. Doctors are saying that the vaccine does not cross the blood-brain barrier, but that is not true. . . . If it reaches the brain, there will be an auto-immune response that will cause inflammation. What characterizes virtually all neuro-degenerative diseases is this misfolded protein that is characteristic to Lou Gerrig’s disease, to Alzheimer’s, to Parkinson’s to Huntington’s, etc. They are different proteins, but they tend to form these sheets of misfolded proteins called Beta Sheets. Now you are asking cells in various parts of the body––including the brain––to make a lot of these proteins and release them to the outside, and , are we sure that’s what it’s all doing? Are you getting clusters of misfolded proteins inside neurons? That would be a bad thing to do. So you’d like to know where it is, how much of it there is, and which groups of neuronal groups it’s targeted. And those are the kinds of questions you like the companies to have solved long before they got authorization and discovered, some years later, that they have a problem.”
“This is a vast experiment that should have been done in the lab on animals and now it is being done on people . . . The potential is that you are going to harm a lot of people while you do this experiment.”
From video interview at “NEUROSCIENTIST’S CONCERNS ABOUT COVID VACCINES” Also quoted in “Vaccine Diabolus and the Impending Wave of Rare Neurodegenerative Disorders.” [link at source]
Is it getting dark enough to see the light? Is it time to return to that transcript from a Rudolf Steiner lecture on “The Fall of the Spirits of Darkness,” from 1917?The most dangerous thing you can do in the immediate future will be to give yourself up unconsciously to the influences which are definitely present; for it makes no difference to their reality whether they are recognized or unrecognized. . . . I have told you that the spirits of darkness are going to inspire their human hosts in whom they will be dwelling to find a vaccine that will drive all inclination towards spirituality out of people’s souls when they are still very young, and this will happen in a roundabout way through the living body. . . . The whole trend goes in a direction where a way will finally be found to vaccinate bodies so that these bodies will not allow the inclination toward spiritual ideas to develop, and all their lives people will believe only in the physical world they perceive with the senses . . .
A Vast Experiment (& The Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation)
March 11, 2021:A group of scientists and doctors has today issued an open letter calling on the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to answer urgent safety questions regarding COVID-19 vaccines, or withdraw the vaccines’ authorisation.
The letter describes serious potential consequences of COVID-19 vaccine technology, warning of possible autoimmune reactions, blood clotting abnormalities, stroke and internal bleeding, “including in the brain, spinal cord and heart.”
The authors request evidence that each medical danger outlined “was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.”
“Should all such evidence not be available”, the authors write, “we demand that approval for use of the gene-based vaccines be withdrawn until all the above issues have been properly addressed by the exercise of due diligence by the EMA.”
The letter is addressed to Emer Cooke, Executive Director of the EMA, and was sent on Monday 1 March 2021. The letter was copied to the President of the Council of Europe and the President of the European Commission.
It states that “the administration of the vaccines constituted and still does constitute ‘human experimentation’, which was and still is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.” It presents new data showing that “vaccine side effects are three times as common in those who have previously been infected with coronavirus.”
It aims to “enumerate and evaluate all deaths which have occurred within 28 days of vaccination, and to compare the clinical pictures with those who have not been vaccinated.”Under Resolution 2361, member states must also inform citizens that vaccination is NOT mandatory and ensure that no one is politically, socially, or otherwise pressured to become vaccinated. States are further required to ensure that no one is discriminated against for not receiving the vaccine.
The letter comes as a petition against UK Government plans for vaccine passports passed 270,000 signatures, more than double that required to compel consideration for debate by MPs. The petition will be debated in the UK Parliament on 15th March 2021.
Render Not Lest Ye Be Rendered
As I have spoken about on this week’s two podcasts, no decision that is the result of deception, coercion, implied threat of ostracization or loss of freedoms, and the sustained manipulation of fight-or flight reactions, can be seen as adult or intelligent, or in any way sensible.
The above data (with the assist of a reader who emailed me some of these links) has been gathered and presented within the space of a single morning and half an afternoon. It did not require enormous amounts of time, energy, or effort to see that something is deeply wrong around the technocratic spellcraft of the Pfizer nano-implant genetic experiment, or that a person would have to be be practicing less discernment than a five-year-old let loose in a candy store to have to submit to such a program. But sadly, when fear drives, the devil rides ~ anyone who bows down or bends over to be mounted.
However, the point I am making here is a subtler one. Regardless of the actual effects and consequences of this worldwide experimentation program (and that’s being charitable, since it far more closely resembles a carefully orchestrated program of eugenocide); and apart from from the social and political implications it has for every last soul on this planet; for individual human beings to consent to such a shadowy agenda, in so trusting, docile, and slavish a manner, presents the most damning evidence possible for the future of humanity.
If this is what is really happening, then humans are doing what lemmings were only rumored, falsely, to have done, and becoming the first species ever to commit mass-suicide.
In the New Order of the New Barbarians (recalled by Lawrence Dunegan from a 1969 talk he attended by Dr. Richard Day), Dunegan recalls:Anybody who was lazy enough to want the convenience foods rather than fixing his own also had better be energetic enough to exercise. Because if he was too lazy to exercise and too lazy to fix his own food, then he didn’t deserve to live very long. This was all presented as sort of a moral judgment about people and what they should do with their energies. People who are smart, who would learn about nutrition, and who are disciplined enough to eat right and exercise right are better people – are the kind you want to live longer.
I mention it now because it is hard, for me at least, not to agree with our social engineers on this point. If a person is too lazy to perform due diligence around the current sociopolitical, industrial-medical drive to submit to a grand “vaccination” program; if they are so out of tune with their own instincts and common-sensical distrust for the institutional powers that are serving us (up to the slaughter) ~ aren’t they getting exactly what they are asking for? This probably seems harsh, and maybe it is. But maybe less so if we consider that those who are complying with the forced vaccination eugenocidal agenda are themselves becoming foot soldiers in the war on human sentience. What they do to themselves, they do to us all.
Consider also that such people are, often enough, also arguing for the sanity and sanctity of the establishment solution, aren’t they thereby, implicitly or explicitly, also encouraging, even pressuring, others to go along with the diabolic drive? I can extend such souls my pity, but not my sympathy. At the same time, though such willful self-destructive action exhausts the reserves of my compassion (“Take my compassion, push it as far as it goes!“), I have no choice but to empathize, just as I have no choice but to empathize with sheep that are slaughtered. Because as one with the Human Energy Field, every last confused and lost soul is also my body and blood. And the latter may be nearing boiling point.
My point is that the manufactured mass consent to malevolent agendas and spiritual darkness under the guise of salvation (move one letter and you get slavation) is more deeply disturbing to me than the apparently eugenocidal program that is being consented to. Millions of people are currently making a life-defining decision that centers around a choice to live or die ~ literally to those who believe the Pfizer implant will save them, and others, from a “pandemic.” Their decision entails handing over their bodies, their health, their immune systems, their very DNA (ancestry and genealogy), allowing the surface of their skins to be penetrated by an unknown agent, manufactured by unknown intelligences, for undisclosed but provably unethical purposes, purely on “faith.”
Their faith is in Mammon, not in God. It is faith that the political and social forces have their interests at heart, and to believe this in 2021, with all the evidence amassed against it, is to go so fully and utterly against one’s own felt, intuitive, instinctive, and bodily sense of what is good and right, as to essentially align oneself with insentience and insensibility, in favor of and an abject dependence on the very forces that are oppressing us.
Isn’t this the programmed behavior of human livestock? Isn’t it time for the goats to separate themselves out from the sheep, and admit that we are better off without a shepherd?
In terms of world history, it is indecent for people to base their judgment on the very ideas which have led to present events, when those events clearly show them to have been wrong. Do people think they can cure the ills of the present time by applying the same principles which have brought them about? If so, they are utterly deceiving themselves.
~ Rudolf Steiner, 1917
Further resources:
US CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
Harvard Report on Vaccine Injuries
UK Covid Adverse Event Reporting System
https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... -reactions
VAERS Med Alerts
https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findf ... AX=COVID19
https://www.scribd.com/document/4923661 ... s-Form-pdf
24/1/21
Nuremberg Code is Your Vaccine Defence
Harvard Report on Vaccine Injuries
https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/hand ... sAllowed=y
Articles:
Vaccine Technology:
7/3/21
Worrying Signs That New Covid Strains Are Mutating the Spike Protein to Defeat Existing Vaccines
https://scitechdaily.com/worrisome-new- ... -variants/
21/2/21
The AstraZeneca Vaccine DNA Plasmids Are Designed to Penetrate the Cell Nucleus – Get Over It ! But It Doesnt Alter Your Genome (Bwah ha ha )
https://allianceforscience.cornell.edu/ ... t-over-it/
19/2/21
The Astra Zeneca Vax Uses Double Stranded DNA (NotMRNA) to Deliver Genetic Spike Protein Instructions, Doesnt Work, Countries Already Rejecting It
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defe ... 3884a04510
17/2/21
How the Astra Zeneca Vax Works , Possible Future Developments
16/1/21
Why RNA Vaccines for Covid19 Raced to the Front of the Pack
https://scitechdaily.com/why-rna-vaccin ... he-pack-2/
15/1/21
Covid19 – How do Viral Vector Vaccines Work
https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articl ... cines-work
12/1/21
How the Oxford AstraZeneca Covid19 Vaccine Was Made
https://www.bmj.com/content/372/bmj.n86
8/1/21
How the Oxford AstraZeneca Vaccine Works
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/202 ... ccine.html
15/7/20
Nanotechnology Plays Major Role in Covid19 Vaccine Development
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200 ... pment.aspx
13/3/21
Thailand Halts AZ Vaccine
Thailand Halts AstraZeneca Vaccinations Following Concerns in Europe
12/3/21
Group of Scientists and Doctors Write to European Medicines Agency Seeking Urgent Clarification on Covid Vaccine Side Effects
Blood Clotting, Stroke and Internal Bleeding in Brain, Spinal Cord and Heart
12/3/21
Denmark Norway Iceland Join Austria to Suspend AZ Vaccine After Thromboembolic Blood Clotting Incidents
https://www.theage.com.au/world/europe/ ... 57a03.html
7 countries plus Austria = 8 Have halted AZ
https://www.winterwatch.net/2021/03/7-e ... ood-clots/
10/3/21
One Nurse Dead and Another Injured as Austria Suspends AZ Covid Vax
etc.