Former chairman of Nasdaq stock exchange arrested

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Former chairman of Nasdaq stock exchange arrested

Postby Byrne » Mon Dec 15, 2008 7:32 pm

BBC wrote:Page last updated at 23:09 GMT, Monday, 15 December 2008
Banks hit worldwide by US 'fraud'


Image
Bernard Madoff in 1999 - AP Photo/The New York Times, Ruby Washington
Mr Madoff is the former chairman of the Nasdaq stock exchange

Some of the world's biggest banks have revealed they are victims of an alleged fraud which has lost $50bn (£33bn).

Bernard Madoff, who was arrested on Thursday, has been charged with fraud in what is being described as one of the biggest-ever such cases.

Among the banks that have been hit are Britain's HSBC and RBS, Spain's Santander and France's BNP Paribas.

Other victims include film director Stephen Spielberg's Wunderkinder Foundation charity.

One of the City's best-known fund managers has criticised US regulators for not detecting the alleged fraud.


Nicola Horlick, boss of Bramdean investments, told the BBC: "I think now it is very difficult for people to invest in things that are meant to be regulated in America, because they have fallen down on the job."

"This is the biggest financial scandal, probably in the history of the markets - $50bn is a huge amount of money," she said.

Counting the cost

Banks and financial institutions across the world had investments with Bernard Madoff, but not all have yet confirmed what their potential losses might be.

Among the potential losers is Spain's largest bank, Santander, which owns the UK High Street banks Abbey, Alliance & Leicester and Bradford & Bingley.

The bank had a direct exposure of 17m euros ($23m; £15m), but clients of its Optimal fund management unit have another 2.3bn euros invested in the firm run by Bernard Madoff

Britain's HSBC said it had investments of about $1bn, which could be affected.


WHAT IS A PONZI SCHEME?
A fraudulent investment scheme paying investors from money paid in by other investors rather than real profits
Named after Charles Ponzi who notoriously used the technique in the United States in 1903
Differs from pyramid selling in that individuals all tend to invest with the same person


Madoff millions vanish

Royal Bank of Scotland said it could potentially lose about £400m ($601m) if all its investments had to be written off.

The French bank, Natixis, a subsidiary of Caisse d'Epargne and Banque Populaire, said it could potentially lose up to 450m euros (£402m; $605m).

One of the world's biggest investment groups, Man, said it had invested about $360m through its RMF institutional fund of funds business, representing 0.5% of its total funds.

Banking shares fell around the world, with Royal Bank of Scotland dropping 3.7%, HSBC losing 1.2% and banks making up the top four losers on New York's Dow Jones Industrial Average.

'Systemic failure'

Meanwhile, some of the biggest private losers seem to have been members of the Palm Beach country club, where many of Mr Madoff's wealthy clients were recruited.

According to some reports, the list of prominent victims include a New Jersey Senator, the owners of the New York Mets and the charities run by film director Stephen Spielberg and Nobel Prize winning writer Elie Wiesel.

MAJOR POTENTIAL LOSSES

Clients of Santander, Spain - $3.1bn
HSBC, UK - $1bn
Natixis, France - $605m
Royal Bank of Scotland, UK - $601m
BNP Paribas, France - $460m
BBVA, Spain - $400m
Man Group, UK - $360m
Reichmuth & Co, Switzerland - $325m
Nomura, Japan - $303m


Mrs Horlick said 9% of Bramdean's own funds were invested with Mr Madoff, but that even if the money was written off, the fund involved would be down just 4%.

"I just want to make it clear to investors that even after this, they would have done extremely well, relative to anything else they could have invested in," she said.

In a statement, Bramdean said: "The allegations made appear to point to a systemic failure of the regulatory and securities markets regime in the US."

However, some argued that the fund managers should themselves have done more.

"City figures cannot call for light touch regulation yet at the same time complain that regulators missed risks that the industry failed to spot," said Simon Morris, a partner with City law firm CMS Cameron McKenna.

"It's the unequivocal job of the fund manager to check out the bona fides of whoever they chose to pass their customers' money onto," he said.

Antonio Borges, chairman of the Hedge Fund Standards Board, said the scandal highlighted the need for "robust governance practices and oversight via independent boards, which will challenge management procedures and behaviour".

Meanwhile one of the City's watchdogs, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) called on whistleblowers to come forward with evidence of corporate wrongdoing in the wake of the credit crunch.

The Serious Fraud Office said it wanted workers, former staff and shareholders to step up with information over suspected fraud in the current financial turmoil.

Director Richard Alderman said: "Our objective is to ensure that we can bring offenders to justice as quickly as possible."

High returns promised

US prosecutors say Mr Madoff, a former head of the Nasdaq stock market, masterminded a fraud of massive proportions through his hedge fund and investment advisory business.

Mr Madoff is alleged to have used money from new investors to pay off existing investors in the fund.

A federal judge has appointed a receiver to oversee Mr Madoff firm's assets and customer accounts, while the 70-year-old banker has been released on $10m bail.

Mr Madoff founded Bernard L Madoff Investment Securities in 1960, but also ran a separate hedge fund business.

According to the US Attorney's criminal complaint filed in court, Mr Madoff told at least three employees on Wednesday that the hedge fund business - which served up to 25 clients and had $17.1bn under management - was a fraud and had been insolvent for years.

He said he was "finished", that he had "absolutely nothing" and "it's all just one big lie", and that it was "basically, a giant Ponzi scheme", the complaint said.

If found guilty, US prosecutors say he could face up to 20 years in prison and a fine of up to $5m.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7783236.stm
User avatar
Byrne
 
Posts: 955
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 2:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby AhabsOtherLeg » Mon Dec 15, 2008 7:46 pm

He... get this, it's great... he Madoff with the money!

*sigh*

This story is weird, though. All the financial news sites are suddenly talking about fraud on Wall Street and amongst the hedge fund crowd as if it was a new thing that had just been revealed - as if all the massive revealed frauds of the last few years had never happened.

One day a memo will come out that has obviously been circulated among all the major financiers, business correspondents, bank managers, venture capitalists, etc.

It'll just say: "Act surprised."
User avatar
AhabsOtherLeg
 
Posts: 3285
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 8:43 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Penguin » Mon Dec 15, 2008 8:01 pm

Word, Ahab...
Penguin
 
Posts: 5089
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby mentalgongfu2 » Mon Dec 15, 2008 8:10 pm

He... get this, it's great... he Madoff with the money!


I've been trying to work that pun into a conversation all day, and failed. Damnit.
"When I'm done ranting about elite power that rules the planet under a totalitarian government that uses the media in order to keep people stupid, my throat gets parched. That's why I drink Orange Drink!"
User avatar
mentalgongfu2
 
Posts: 1966
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 6:02 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Re: Former chairman of Nasdaq stock exchange arrested

Postby Occult Means Hidden » Mon Dec 15, 2008 8:27 pm

Lots of talk of who the victims are, but not much on where and to whom the money went.

Byrne wrote:
BBC wrote:a fraud of massive proportions through his hedge fund and investment advisory business.

Mr Madoff is alleged to have used money from new investors to pay off existing investors in the fund.

A federal judge has appointed a receiver to oversee Mr Madoff firm's assets and customer accounts, while the 70-year-old banker has been released on $10m bail.

Mr Madoff founded Bernard L Madoff Investment Securities in 1960, but also ran a separate hedge fund business.



Could possibly be an excuse to account for illegal transfers of $50B from "victims" (say its an illegal mistake, when it's not) while taking out a tool (Madoff) who has lost favor with the establishment, as well.
Rage against the ever vicious downward spiral.
Time to get back to basics. [url=http://zmag.org/zmi/readlabor.htm]Worker Control of Industry![/url]
User avatar
Occult Means Hidden
 
Posts: 1403
Joined: Mon Nov 06, 2006 1:34 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby jingofever » Mon Dec 15, 2008 9:29 pm

Don't worry, everyone will be bailed out. Somebody might want to check if Judge Louis L. Stanton invested with Madoff.
User avatar
jingofever
 
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Penguin » Mon Dec 15, 2008 9:42 pm

Some updates via Cryptogon: http://cryptogon.com/?p=5677

"The Desperate Final Hours of the World’s Biggest Ever Financial Fraud"

UPDATE: Madoff Claims to Have Acted Alone

Impossible.

It’s like I said when the news first broke. He’s trying to stay alive. This one goes all the way up the ladder. One wrong word and he’s dead, his family is dead, etc. He knows it. He’s sticking to a script.

For the first time, I’m preemptively adding a story, this story, to the Assassination category. People involved with this, at the levels we don’t even know about yet, mainly, the management of day-to-day operations, are probably already dead. I could be wrong, but far less serious situations than this have produced corpses.

Via: New York Times: http://finance.yahoo.com/banking-budget ... -to-Vanish

But a question still dominates the investigation: how one person could have pulled off such a far-reaching, long-running fraud, carrying out all the simple practical chores the scheme required, like producing monthly statements, annual tax statements, trade confirmations and bank transfers.

Firms managing money on Mr. Madoff’s scale would typically have hundreds of people involved in these administrative tasks. Prosecutors say he claims to have acted entirely alone.

“Our task is to find the records and follow the money,” said Alexander Vasilescu, a lawyer in the New York office of the Securities and Exchange Commission. As of Sunday night, he said, investigators could not shed much light on the fraud or its scale. “We do not dispute his number — we just have not calculated how he made it,” he said.



Even before Madoff collapsed, some employees were mystified by the 17th floor. In recent regulatory filings, Mr. Madoff claimed to manage $17 billion for clients — a number that would normally occupy far more than the 20 or so people who worked on 17.

One Madoff employee said he and other workers assumed that Mr. Madoff must have a separate office elsewhere to oversee his client accounts.



Fairfield boasted about its investigative skills. On its Web site, the firm claimed to investigate hedge fund managers for 6 to 12 months before investing. As part of the process, a team of examiners conducted personal background checks, audited brokerage records and trading reports and interviewed hedge fund executives and compliance officials.

In 2001, Mr. Madoff called Fairfield and invited the firm to inspect his books after two news reports questioned the validity of his returns, according to a person close to Fairfield. Outside auditors hired to inspect Mr. Madoff’s operations concluded that “everything checked out,” this person said.

The Fairfield Greenwich Group “performed comprehensive and conscientious due diligence and risk monitoring,” Marc Kasowitz, a lawyer for Fairfield, said in a statement. “FGG, like so many other Madoff clients, was a victim of a highly sophisticated massive fraud that escaped the detection of top institutional and private investors, industry organizations, auditors, examiners and regulatory authorities.”

—End Update—

There are multiple connections to narcotics money and other covert operations here somewhere. I don’t know where just yet, but let’s keep our eyes open for them as people associated with this begin to commit “suicide” etc.

This was WAY, WAY to big to have been managed by one guy, or a small group of people.

Via: Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008 ... treet-news

Bernard Madoff, one of Wall Street’s most respected financiers, apparently planned to carve up his last $300m (£200m) between friends, family and employees before making the shocking confession that his investment prowess was really the result of one of the world’s biggest ever frauds.

But, according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the 70-year-old could not implement his plan before his huge pyramid scheme - whose 10-12% annual returns had attracted top-flight investors around the globe - collapsed with losses of at least $50bn.

His once-devoted followers were today still counting the cost of their investment in the funds run by Madoff. Investors in his native US as well as the UK, Spain, France, Italy, Switzerland and Japan appear to be caught up in the alleged scam.

Spanish bank Santander announced last night that it had exposure to Madoff Securities of €2.33bn (£2.1bn), of which €2.01bn was invested for institutions and private banking clients outside Spain, through an Ireland-registered subsidiary of its Optimal fund.

Other possible victims include Royal Bank of Scotland, which is 58% owned by the UK taxpayer, Alliance & Leicester and parts of Bradford & Bingley, and hedge funds such as Man Group, which has an estimated exposure of $240m.

Thousands of wealthy individuals, largely from Jewish communities in New York and Florida, were also expected to turn to their lawyers as news spread that Madoff had been arrested, charged with fraud and released on a $10m bond after apparently confessing to his two sons, Mark and Andrew, and FBI special agent Theodore Cacioppi.

The highest profile loser in the UK so far is Nicola Horlick, the City fund manager whose investment firm, Bramdean, had almost 10% of its assets invested with Madoff. This in turn leaves Horlick’s investors, such as local authority pension funds in Merseyside and Hampshire, and property tycoon Vincent Tchenguiz, potentially exposed to the unravelling scandal.

Swiss private bank Reichmuth Matterhorn admitted yesterday it had lost $327m, amid speculation that the total bill in Switzerland could be much higher. US hedge funds are also affected as well as prominent US business executives.

As investigators from US regulator the securities and exchange commission ploughed through the records at the New York headquarters of Bernard L Madoff Investment Securities, they faced accusations last night that they had not examined his books since he registered the firm in September 2006. The Financial Services Authority, the UK watchdog, was thought to be keeping abreast of the situation.

Madoff is himself regulated by the FSA, along with his two sons, his brother Peter and six other registered individuals, though his eponymous London-based offshoot. However, Stephen Raven, chief executive of London-based Madoff Securities International, said the firm was “not in any way part of” the New York company caught up in the alleged scam.

Unravelling the Madoff investment scheme could take months as he faces questions from both the FBI and the SEC, which has filed separate civil charges.

In a statement signed by Cacioppi, Madoff is quoted as saying that he “paid investors with money that wasn’t there”, that he was “broke” and “insolvent”, and “it could not go on”.

Madoff’s alleged scam appears to have started to unravel when investors feeling the pain of the credit crunch put in claims for redemptions of $7bn - a sizable sum for a firm that claimed to have $17.1bn under management. Last Tuesday he stunned a senior colleague - believed to be one of his sons - with the revelation that he intended to pay bonuses in December rather than February. When challenged, and appearing under “great stress”, Madoff arranged a meeting in his Manhattan apartment where he made the startling confession: “It’s all just one big lie.”

He said he was “finished”, had “absolutely nothing” and his investment firm was “basically a giant Ponzi scheme” - a type of fraud invented by Charles Ponzi in the US after the first world war which involves disbursing “returns” to investors out of money from new entrants.

He said he had planned to hand himself over to the authorities but first wanted to divide up the $200m to $300m he had left among selected employees, families and friends - hence the need to pay bonuses early. The confession which was apparently made to his sons was reported to the authorities and the distribution of assets never took place.

He is due in court on Friday. His lawyers have said they “will fight to get through this unfortunate set of events”. The blame game has already begun. Horlick has attacked a “systemic failure of the regulatory and securities markets regime in the US”.

“It is astonishing that this apparent fraud seems to have been continuing for so long, possibly for decades, while investors have continued to invest more money into the Madoff funds,” she said.

There are also warnings from lawyers that practices such as these are more likely to unravel during tricky market conditions. Steven Philippsohn, chairman of the Commercial Fraud Lawyers Association, said: “This is the tip of the iceberg.”
Penguin
 
Posts: 5089
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby nathan28 » Mon Dec 15, 2008 11:34 pm

not sure what i think of this one yet.

a few years ago a currency trader at a bank in baltimore defrauded $750 million. It is pretty open-and-shut what happened: he lost a lot of money, went into the gambler's tilt, lost even more money and then created a fake paper trail to conceal the losses and keep the back-office staff from red-flagging him. eventually someone tried to call one of the brokers he claimed to be using: it didn't exist, and the trader, a "pro-active" type, went to the mailroom to get a box for his belongings.

No drug money, no gun running, no terrorism, no kiddie porn. Just a bunch of really bad forex trades and some phony records. This character's wife didn't know and neither did his friends at the counterparty offices. That was 750 million that just disappeared, and it took two or three years before anyone followed the very, very short trail of breadcrumbs.

And another character, father of the dubious "Pi Cycle", had a ponzi scheme for $300 million. But he had a few accomplices.

What I'm saying is that my gut reaction is that Kevin at Cryptogon is right, that this guy is a patsy. But it's also possible to make a lot of money just disappear, and while a lot of people participated in the events that caused the disappearance, only a handful, maybe just one, need to know the full picture. the rest are just typing numbers into spreadsheets and putting in order tickets. it is classic compartmentalization.

anyway, this will be in the courts for a llooooooonnnnnggg time.
User avatar
nathan28
 
Posts: 2957
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 6:48 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby jingofever » Mon Dec 15, 2008 11:58 pm

I think everyone assumes that his family was involved and that he is taking the fall to protect them.
User avatar
jingofever
 
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:24 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

where's the dough ?

Postby hava1 » Tue Dec 16, 2008 5:13 am

You all seem to agree that Madoff is a "wink wink" case,namely a sort of fallguy to cover for a larger ongoing scam. Since this scam has affected Israeli corporations (two large insurance corps and others), i wonder if anyone knows where's the dough ? who took the big money ? what's behind that in the subtext, especially re Israel and Israeli economy ?

---
hava1
 
Posts: 1141
Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2006 1:07 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Penguin » Tue Dec 16, 2008 5:44 pm

More updates on the story, again via Cryptogon - thanks!

Madoff’s “Auditing” Firm: Friehling & Horowitz, One Room Office, Three Employees http://cryptogon.com/?p=5701

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid= ... refer=news
The auditor for Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, whose namesake was charged in a $50 billion Ponzi scheme last week, is under investigation by the district attorney in New York’s Rockland County, a northern suburb of New York City.

The New City, New York, auditing firm Friehling & Horowitz signed off on the annual financial statement of Madoff’s Manhattan-based investment advisory business through Oct. 31, 2006, according to a copy obtained by Bloomberg News.

Madoff was charged by federal prosecutors in Manhattan and sued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Dec. 11. He told senior employees that the firm was insolvent and “had been for years,” prosecutors said in the criminal complaint. David Friehling, whose name is on the door to the store-front accounting office, hasn’t been charged.

“We’re trying to determine if there have been any state crimes here,” Rockland County District Attorney Thomas Zugibe said in a telephone interview yesterday. “When you have a key player like that operating in your county, you have to look.”

Friehling didn’t return calls for comment.

Zugibe said, among other things, he was probing to see whether any other Rockland-based businesses or other organizations might be affected.

“The implication is pretty broad,” Zugibe said.

Friehling is on the board of the JCC Rockland, a Jewish center in the county. He also is a past-president and a current board member of the Rockland chapter of the New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants.

Hedge Fund Adviser

Hedge fund investment adviser Aksia LLC warned clients last year not to put their money with Madoff after learning of “red flags” at his company, including that its books were audited by a three-person accounting firm.

Friehling & Horowitz included one partner in his late 70s who lives in Florida, a secretary, and one active accountant, Aksia said.

The copy of the four-page annual financial statement, dated Dec. 18, 2006, attested that the financial statements of Madoff’s securities firm were “in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.”

The financial analysis said Madoff Securities had $1.3 billion in assets, including $711 million in marketable securities and $67 million in U.S. debt. Members’ equity, the firm’s net worth, was $604 million, according to the document.

The firm operates from a storefront office in the Georgetown Office Plaza in New City, New York, sandwiched between a pediatrician’s office and another medical office.

Leslie Cousar, who works in a nearby office, said on Dec. 12 that the man who comes to the auditor’s office does so for 10-to- 15 minute periods and leaves. She said he drives a Lexus and doesn’t dress in business attire.

The case is U.S. v. Madoff, 08-MAG-02735, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (Manhattan).


SEC Didn’t Act on Madoff Tips http://cryptogon.com/?p=5697

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... id=topnews

Imagine my shock.

Friehling and Horowitz… Just where is that rabbit hole going to lead?

Via: Washington Post:

The Securities and Exchange Commission learned about what it describes as one of the largest securities frauds in history when Bernard L. Madoff volunteered his confession, raising questions about the agency’s ability to police the financial marketplace.

The SEC had the authority to investigate Madoff’s investment business, which managed billions of dollars for wealthy investors and philanthropies. Financial analysts raised concerns about Madoff’s practices repeatedly over the past decade, including a 1999 letter to the SEC that accused Madoff of running a Ponzi scheme. But the agency did not conduct even a routine examination of the investment business until last week.



Others said that the SEC should have flagged Madoff for examination no later than the moment he registered as an investment adviser, in 2006, because of the history of complaints against his firm and because of its unusual characteristics. These included Madoff’s history of smooth earnings — above 10 percent a year, every year — and his company’s reliance on a small auditing firm that had no other large Wall Street clients.

Aksia, a New York-based consulting firm that advises institutional investors about hedge funds, found that Madoff’s auditor worked out of a 13-foot-by-18-foot office in Rockland County, N.Y., with only three employees. The employees of the firm, which had only Madoff as a client, included a 78-year-old living in Florida and a secretary, Aksia said it discovered. The auditor, Friehling and Horowitz, did not respond to a request for comment.

“If it’s true that the SEC had begun receiving warnings in 1999, then even if they did nothing before then, surely when he registered with them in 2006, he should have gone to the top of their list,” said Barbara Roper of the Consumer Federation of America.

Madoff avoided scrutiny despite the dogged bell-ringing of a Boston accountant, employed by another investment firm, who repeatedly accused Madoff of breaking the law in a series of letters to the SEC that began in 1999. The accountant, Harry Markopolos, said he sent his most recent letter in April.

A former SEC enforcement official said the letters should have raised red flags for regulators.

He said that investigating a Ponzi scheme is not difficult: The agency can simply demand proof that the investment adviser holds the amount of money he claims to hold. And he added that regulators also should have noticed that Madoff was audited by a tiny company with no reputation. He said there are only a few accounting firms with the sophistication to audit an investment adviser that, at the time of registration with the SEC, reported $17 billion on assets.

Regulators should have noticed instantly, he said, that Madoff’s auditor was not on the list.
Penguin
 
Posts: 5089
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2007 5:56 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby AlicetheKurious » Wed Dec 17, 2008 3:01 am

The whole point of a Ponzi scheme is that the ones who put their money in first, make a killing, and those who get in last get caught holding the bag.

Who were Madoff's first investors, the lucky ones? Who were the very last investors who put their money into the scheme, before Madoff's sons had their sudden change of heart and decided to turn their father in?

I would like to see a list of investors, in chronological order, of Madoff's clients, the amounts they invested, and the total returns each one got over the years.

This will require a serious criminal investigation, as Madoff seems to have run his office as a sort of front, with the genuine paper trail kept in another, so far secret, location. I wonder if there will ever be such an investigation.

Madoff was also apparently a "philanthropist", donating huge amounts of money to certain tax-registered "charities" when he wasn't busily ripping other people off.

I think it would also be very interesting to see who runs those "charities" and how much they were paid in salary and expenses over the years.

Also, the SEC had apparently been receiving complaints and requests that they investigate Madoff for at least a decade, which for some reason they ignored.

Somehow I doubt that there will be a proper investigation of the SEC to see why, and to hold the criminally negligent (or complicit) individuals accountable.

It's just stupid to let Madoff alone take the fall, when all the evidence points to a far larger conspiracy.

Contrary to what the news articles are implying, money doesn't just disappear into thin air -- it goes into someone's pockets. Will there ever be a proper, independent investigation to determine whose pockets?
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Gouda » Wed Dec 17, 2008 4:46 am

Why didn't the SEC act on the tips?

Apart from the SEC being an inside joke amongst the private sector and banking, maybe it is also because he was appointed to a committee of academics, regulators and executives formed in 2000 by former SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt to advise the agency.

Too respected to fail? And/Or too connected....

Hey, there's Chuck Schumer, as usual:
One thing is clear, Madoff, known as a Wall Street legend, was a man with many connections in high places. Since 2000, he has given at least $100,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and more than $23,000 to the party's candidates, including Senator Charles Schumer of New York, the chairman of the Joint Economic Committee of Congress, and Senator Lautenberg. His legal defense team includes Mark Mukasey, the son of the current attorney general.


Perhaps Madoff, at the helm of NASDAQ, wanted to get in on some of Grasso's NYSE action:

Image
Richard Grasso, president, New York Stock Exchange, left, joined by former Security and Exchange Commission Chairman, center, and Bernard Madoff, (circled), chairman of Madoff Investment Securities, sit before the House subcommittee on Telecommunications and Finance, in this May 13, 1993 file photo.

FARC not pictured here.

Says Madoff on a panel in 2007: "You have to understand, Wall Street is one big turf war..."

True enough Bernie, but we also understand that Wall Street has bigger enemies (democracy, transparency, accountability, regulation, government, the public, etc) than each other and thus certain gentleman's agreements are in order.
User avatar
Gouda
 
Posts: 3009
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 1:53 am
Location: a circular mould
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby AlicetheKurious » Wed Dec 17, 2008 7:32 am

Madoff bought influence in Washington

By EAMON JAVERS & LISA LERER | 12/16/08 4:43 AM EST


Within a day of the Dec. 11 arrest of Wall Street financier Bernard L. Madoff, his Washington lobbyists were scrambling to sever all ties to a man who’s been accused of a $50 billion fraud and who may go down in history as the largest financial scam artist ever.

The lobbying firm Dow Lohnes Government Strategies filed paperwork on Dec. 12, terminating its lobbying contract with Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities. That ended more than 10 years of Madoff lobbying in Washington, in which his investment firm spent more than $400,000 to influence the federal government.

But lobbying is just a piece of Madoff’s influence in Washington. His family has contributed nearly $400,000 to political committees. And his niece, Shana Madoff Swanson, who serves as a compliance attorney at his firm, is married to a former high-ranking Securities and Exchange Commission official, Eric Swanson.

Swanson was the assistant director in the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations’ market oversight unit in Washington.
According to his biography, Swanson “supervised and conducted inspections and examinations that involved a wide range of issues including best execution, order handling, insider trading [and] market manipulation.”

The SEC has come under criticism for not following up on tips that Madoff’s investment returns seemed suspicious. Mr. Swanson left the SEC in 2006. He married Madoff’s niece the next year. He now works at a firm called BATS Exchange, which describes itself as “the third-largest stock exchange” in the United States, behind the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq.

A spokesman for BATS said: “Eric Swanson worked at the SEC for 10 years and did not participate in any inquiry of Bernard Madoff Securities or its affiliates while involved in a relationship with Shana, whom he met through her trade association work in the industry. They were married in 2007. Throughout his career, Eric has displayed the highest ethical standards and his reputation has been — and continues to be — above reproach.”

At the SEC, Lori Richards, director of compliance inspections and examinations, said Swanson was a member of an exam team that reviewed the Madoff broker-dealer in 1999 and 2004, but did not participate in the 2005 exam of the broker-dealer firm by the New York office.

“In any event,” she said, “the SEC has very strict rules prohibiting SEC staff from participating in matters involving firms where they have a personal interest. Subsequently, Mr. Swanson did not work on any other examination matters involving the Madoff firm before leaving the agency."

The lobbying work netted Dow Lohnes $10,000 in the most recent quarter, and called for Madoff’s Washington team to push for passage of the $700 billion Wall Street bailout bill, among other projects.

...

The lobbying effort was just one of the ways Madoff peddled influence in Washington. His brother, Peter, is the senior managing director of Madoff Investment Securities, and he’s serving his second term on the board of the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, a lobbying group that represents financial services firms.

Bernard Madoff sat of the board of directors of the Securities Industry Association, an advocacy group that merged with the Bond Market Association in 2006 to form SIFMA. The two Madoff brothers have given $56,000 to the lobbying organization over the past nine years.

“We’re looking at everything based on the unfolding facts and taking this very seriously, as you can imagine,” said SIFMA spokesman Travis Larson.

The Madoffs were also hefty donors to political candidates. In total, the Madoff family has donated more than $380,000 to political candidates, parties and political action committees since 1993, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. The giving skewed largely Democratic, although donations were made to several Republicans, including scandal-ridden Rep. Vito J. Fossella (R-N.Y.).
....
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1208/16608.html
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby AlicetheKurious » Wed Dec 17, 2008 8:58 am

Imagine my SHOCK!!!! :popcorn:


Judge signs order to protect Madoff investors

Mon Dec 15, 8:30 pm ET

NEW YORK –
A federal judge on Monday threw a lifesaver to investors who may have been duped in one of Wall Street's biggest alleged frauds, saying they need the protection of a special government reserve fund set up to help investors at failed brokerage firms.

U.S. District Judge Louis L. Stanton ordered that clients of Bernard Madoff's private investment business seek relief under a federal statute created to rescue cheated investors. Stanton also ordered that [the] business be liquidated under the jurisdiction of a bankruptcy court and named attorney Irvin H. Picard as trustee to oversee that process.

Stanton signed the order after the Securities Investor Protection Corporation asked that steps be taken to protect investors in the scheme, which has ensnared several major banks and prominent figures as victims and could result in as much as $50 billion in losses.

Congress created the SIPC in 1970 to protect investors when a brokerage firm fails and cash and securities are missing from accounts. Funds can be used to satisfy the remaining claims of each customer up to a maximum of $500,000. The figure includes a maximum of up to $100,000 on claims for cash.

The order came just days after federal prosecutors charged Madoff with securities fraud, saying he had admitted to orchestrating a massive Ponzi scheme. Madoff is free on $10 million bail after he was charged with securities fraud last week.

Ira Lee Sorkin, Madoff's lawyer, declined to comment.

SIPC President Stephen Harbeck said in a statement that the fund's task will be harder than in other bankruptcies because of the size of the misappropriation and the condition of the defunct firm's records. ...

Link
User avatar
AlicetheKurious
 
Posts: 5348
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2006 11:20 am
Location: Egypt
Blog: View Blog (0)

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 155 guests