by OnoI812 » Thu Aug 04, 2005 9:02 pm
Note- Heneghan has previously stated that Fitxgerald is running no less than 5 possibly 6 SECRET grand jurys involved in the Plame affair. Flocco's article deals with a supposed Chicago grand jury that is the one that is involved with the wider far reaching aspects,and that Judge Leftkow sits as an ex-parte in the Chicago case...<br><br>partial transcript from 8/3 Floyd report: part one<br><br>Richard Palmquist=RP<br>Tom Heneghan=TH<br>Jeremy Floyd= JF<br><br>(Palmquist{owner of truthradio} breaks in to broadcast at appx 5:20 PST)<br><br>RP- Yeah Tom, Richard Palmquist here. I seldom break into your program here Jeremy, but, about an hour and ten minutes ago Diane Burley testified that she phoned the US Attorney's office in Chicago seeking verification of the Tom Flocco article about the grand jury's indictments of president Bush & vice president Cheney. She said that the attorney Generals.. uhh.. yeah the Federal attorney generals office in Chicago, High official there... indicates there is no such indictment...<br><br>TH- Let me ask you a question, Richard?<br><br>RP- I'd like to hear you're comment on this, <br><br>TH- well let me ask you this..<br><br>RP- I think there are some people listening now who had heard her say that? I'd like to hear your response...<br><br>TH- Well ...the indictments haven't been issued yet, they haven't been released yet...who did she talk to?<br><br>RP- well she talked to a high official in the, ahh , US attorneys office.<br><br>TH- well....that...US..attorney's office...cannot at this point.. release the indictments until the business of the Grand jury is finished. So, for him to admit there had been indictments..at this point<br><br>RP- well no wait, the the.. Tom's article puts it in the past tense...Have_been_indicted. That's English language "past tense" <br>TH- Has_been_indicted, I have it on good source close to the investigation that the "True Bills" have been issued. That the Grand Jury foreman has issued the indictments of Bush & Cheney. And that all it takes now , is for Mr Fitzgerald to publicly announce the indictments.<br>So for her to call somebody close to the US attorney's office and, ASK, at this point, If they had been indicted...Without Mr Fitzgerald actually making the announcement, I'm not surprised, at this point, that there would be denials of the "indictments Forthcoming", until they actually are produced. I'm just reporting to you based on what I know, and the evidence I'm aware of, and the people I have talked to...That these indictments ARE done, and ARE going to be presented to the American people, In a VERY short period of time.<br><br>RP- Well, would you say, from the stand point of your source of the information, That if there is no such indictment, that it can be demontrated that the US attorney has more authority than the US Grandy Jury?<br><br>TH- at this point I'm not going to comment on...on what the US attorney is going to do...because he was not the individual that Ms Burley talked to...<br><br>RP- No, obviously she didn't talk to the US attorney in Chicago...but she did talk to...<br><br>TH- she talked to a representative of the US attorney's office, Which is a general Office, which is invovled in various cases besides the Grand jury investigating the Valerie Plame' leak. So to ask him, a representative...Do you remember the name of the individual Ms Burley talked to?<br><br>RP- Uh...I think she'll be calling Jeremy or Stew shortly.<br><br>TH- well, I would like to talk to her right on the air, and ask her who she talked to, because I can tell you this , knowing what I know about court procedure and judicial procedure. It is not a surprise that an individual in that office would deny, at this point, that any indictments had been issued...since probably the individual that she had talked to is not familiar with the grand Jury procedure that Mr Fitzgerald is involved in anyway.<br><br>JF- we'll have to pick it up on the other side... don't go away<br><br>(Break)<br><br> <p></p><i></i>