9/11 Cult Watch

[8bitagent]

http://www.websurdity.com/2007/02/28/uncomfortable-questions-was-the-death-star-attack-an-inside-job/

Uncomfortable Questions: Was the Death Star Attack an Inside Job?

Websurdity Link: This article was inspired by the fine users at the James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF) Forum, to whom I am indebted for the use of much of this material.

We’ve all heard the “official conspiracy theory” of the Death Star attack. We all know about Luke Skywalker and his ragtag bunch of rebels, how they mounted a foolhardy attack on the most powerful, well-defended battle station ever built. And we’ve all seen the video over, and over, and over, of the one-in-a-million shot that resulted in a massive chain reaction that not just damaged, but completely obliterated that massive technological wonder.

THATS FUNNY, because the ENTIRE plot of Star Wars Revenge of the Sith(Episode 3, the last Star Wars film) was ABOUT a group of occult secret society darklords behind the ruling government who use provocatuer agents and military to stage FALSE FLAG terror attacks on Coruscant...making it look as tho the Jedi did it. One scene, of smoke rising from a Coruscant tower in the background was clearly designed to echo the WTC fire.

And what happened? Emperor Palpatine assumes full emergency control and uses the false flag terror attacks to crush civil rights and launch all out war. As Princess Amidala says "So this is how liberty dies, with thundering applause"...as the senate gets whipped into a Patriot Act like frenzy.

So once again, the JREF idiots lose.

[orz]

But the Rebels killed approx 1 million people when they destroyed the death star.

THE NEXT ONE OF ORZ, NOMO, JEFF or ISACHAR WHO POSTS IN THIS THREAD LOSES THE ARGUMENT

A WINNER IS YOU!

[Joe Hillshoist]

Brainpanhandler fully captures my sense of disgust

Haha amazing. This makes the whole dumb thread worthwhile. Congratulations everyone!!!

Shame is right brain.

This is an interestingly ambiguous statement out of context!

I stopped reading this about 14 pages ago and skipped to the last one.

I don't really want to go back and read any more of it. Can someone who isn't up their own arse about this please tell me if its worth it.

[orz]

It's not.

[Joe Hillshoist]

Cheers.

[isachar]

Cheers.

It seems that forensics and analysis of physical evidence of the crime scene have proven critical in determining and/or confirming that a second shooter was involved in RFK assassination.

http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Scientist ... _0326.html

But god forbid anyone should attempt to use/apply valid, legitimate and well-accepted forensic evidence and analyses of physical characteristics to determine how the WTC's collapsed. No, such people should be pilloried, scorned and subject to all forms of accusations and abuse.

After all the only legitimate hypothese are those that meet with jeff's approval and that of his sychopantic chorus of yapping lap dogs. Any hypothese that do not meet with their approval - and especially any that utilize forensic analysis of physical evidence to suggest the collapse of the WTC's was aided by means other than gravity, impact, and impact-related fires must be subject to all perverse means the Amen Amy's can muster. Only their preferred approaches and hypotheses meeting with their approval are valid. Those approaches and hypotheses not meeting with their approval, and those putting such forward, must be repressed.

Had a similar coterie of repressive sychophants prevalied with respect to RFK's murder, the above article would likely never have seen the light of day.

[DrVolin]

A well grounded analysis that demonstrates or even strongly suggests a CD of the towers would be fantastic! I'd love to see that. I just haven't seen one yet that survives even mild examination.

[slimmouse]

A well grounded analysis that demonstrates or even strongly suggests a CD of the towers would be fantastic! I'd love to see that. I just haven't seen one yet that survives even mild examination.

.....Believe the nist report

[DrVolin]

The NIST report doesn't survive mild scrutiny either.

[Brentos]

A well grounded analysis that demonstrates or even strongly suggests a CD of the towers would be fantastic! I'd love to see that. I just haven't seen one yet that survives even mild examination.

What do you mean by 'CD' though? Its really just a matter of semantics.

Yes there is evidence of very high energies not attributable to potential energy or jet fuel. I recollect you mentioning mini-nukes as a possibility. I don't have an opinion, just that potential energy from standard collapse cant suffice. Some solid research has ruled out standard structural collapse, which confers with common sense. To frame the collapses as 'standard CD' IMO, doesn't make sense, which might be Jeff's point.

oh yeah, lets keep this thread alive

[slimmouse]

The NIST report doesn't survive mild scrutiny either.

Indeed. The ultimate "dead herring" ( quote from blackadder)

A report designed it would appear ( according to some on here) , to deliberately confuse people into believing that the collapse of the towers wasnt caused by the impact of the planes ( not to mention building 7)

All in order to prevent people from grasping the true nature of the "inside Job "that was 9/11 by making it unnecesary to read 20 tomes of follow the money books in order to see the bleeding obvious.

Ve-e-e-ry clever !

Its kinda appropriate that this kind of logic should appear in a thread involving Paul Stott and Larry O Hara.

Nuff said really.

[orz]

Two wrongs don't make a right.


0.999... = 1

[DrVolin]

0.999... = 1

not in the light of complexity theory. Sensitivity to initial conditions.

[Hugh Manatee Wins]

A well grounded analysis that demonstrates or even strongly suggests a CD of the towers would be fantastic! I'd love to see that. I just haven't seen one yet that survives even mild examination.

http://www.ae911truth.org/

This is The physical evidence site. Read it.

Welcome to Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth!

302 architectural and engineering professionals
and 1184 other supporters including A/E students
have signed the petition demanding of Congress
a truly independent investigation.

[slimmouse]

Two wrongs don't make a right.


0.999... = 1

Psst..

We dont need to be right......they do

And theyre more full of shit than....than......than......the NIST report.

They are full of shit, right ?

People do have the right to point that out dont they ?

Or does that make them "moon beam from out of space" people ?

Meanwhile, keeping it simple ;



believe the NIST report.