bird flu, tamiflu and the pentagon

by **eric144** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 12:01 am

Tamiflu is the expensive anti viral agent that goverments world wide are stocking to protect against H5N1 bird flu. It is made by a company called Gilead Sciences, a subsidiary of Roche. Roche will not outsource the manufacture of the drug but are going to step up production by 10 times by next year. Big profits lie ahead. <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2005/10/12/news/international/roche/">money.cnn.com/2005/10/12/...nal/roche/</a> Here is a press release by Gilead Sciences announcing a new chairman in 1997. <a href="http://www.gilead.com/wt/sec/pr_933190157/">www.gilead.com/wt/sec/pr_933190157/</a> The chairman was very influential in having the drug passed by the FDA, accusations have been made the trials were rigged. <a href="http://archive.democrats.com/preview.cfm?term=Donald%20Rumsfeld">archive.democrats.com/pre...20Rumsfeld</a> Unfortunately, it seems that H5N1 may be resistant to Tamiflu so all that expense may be in vain. <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051015/ap_on_he_me/bird_flu_resistance">news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20051...resistance</a> The same man was a director of another Swiss company that sold a nuclear power station to North Korea of all places. Interesting coincidences.

by **marykmusic** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:55 am

No coincidences... that's the way I see the world. Here's an appropriate quote from a classic book that I'm re-reading: "Many viruses inherently capable of causing death, in normal conditions contribute to the overall health of the body, existing side by side as it were with other viruses, each contributing quite necessary activities that maintain bodily equilibrium. "If [certain viruses] are triggered, however, to higher activity or overproduction by mental states, they then become 'deadly.'" The Individual and the Nature of Mass Events, Roberts (1981), p. 30. It's all about putting folks into a Fear mindset, then profiting therefrom. --MaryK

by **banned** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 3:17 am

...if this bird flu thang is really a genetically altered superbug designed to cull the herd, or a put up job to send Big Pharma profits through the roof. Most likely, it's both. Bird Flu, Tamiflu, Tippecanoe and Tyler Too!

by **jenz** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 5:36 am

am I right in thinking that this was the company which originally supplied LSD for the initial mind control experiments and then later made rohypnol, in a small rapidly dissolving, tasteless, highly convenient for surreptitious use form?

by **eric144** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 8:39 am

Bird flu drug sales boost Roche Roche is thinking of allowing other firm to manufacturer Tamiflu Drugs firm Roche has seen third-quarter revenues rise 17% helped by a jump in sales of Tamiflu, which is seen as the best treatment for bird flu. The Swiss firm said sales of Tamiflu had more than doubled to 279m Swiss francs ($214m; £123m), compared with the same period a year earlier. The company's overall sales for the three months to the end of September climbed to 8.8bn Swiss francs. Roche said earlier this week that it may allow other firms to make Tamiflu. Government stockpiles The firm is now producing Tamiflu as fast as it can after the World Health Organization (WHO) advised countries to stockpile supplies to help combat a potential bird flu pandemic. Roche now makes Tamiflu at 13 sites worldwide, producing more than 100 million capsules a year. The WHO has warned that a flu pandemic could potentially kill up to seven million people, although others warn of a much higher death toll. Roche's Tamiflu drug is seen as the most effective treatment for the most dangerous strain of bird flu, which killed 60 people in Asia in 2003, but it is not a vaccine. During the third quarter Roche said it also benefited from strong sales of its anti-cancer treatments, with sales of anti-cancer drug Avastin doubling to 486m francs. Roche's trading update beat market expectations, but the firm said its full-year profits target remained unchanged. <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4355636.stm">news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4355636.stm</a>

by **sussurus2** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 12:08 pm

It occurred to me the other day that in addition to "culling" as it was put in an earlier post above, the fact that the flu would tend to kill older weaker people would also "help" with the intergenerational transfer of wealth, thus from a certain diabolical perspective, increase the flow of capital into consumer spending by boomers as their parents kick the bucket. And those funeral services that did so well after the hurricane? You betcha... Sorry for the early morning morbidity folks. I'm actually better with keeping perspective & equilibrium at night... S.

by **eric144** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 12:23 pm

I think the reason for bird flu is to replicate New Orleans on a national (US and UK) scale, putting troops on the street and keeping them there. In that way, there will be no protests about the military bombardment of Iran. It also sets the Orwellian atmosphere required for the global takeover that Mugabe and Chavez are warning about. It has to happen soon before other countries start catching up. The British Empire backed by American muscle and directed by its Zionist parasites will stay in control. No anti-semitism intended. I have a sanguine view of this, there has always been a dominant force, it may as well be us. A world government will simply cement English speaking hegemony in perpetuity by the way, any pretense at partnership will e just that.

by **proldic** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 3:53 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>The British Empire backed by American muscle and directed by its Zionist parasites will stay in control. No anti-semitism intended.<hr></blockquote> How is that by any stretch of the imagination not anti-semitic? And not very provocateur-ish? Who are those "parasites" you refer to? Oh right, Christian Zionists. Mmm-hmm. You couldn't be so stupid as to be trying to offer your opinions about world affairs without knowing that the word "parasites" as in "parasites directing imperialism" has been traditionally associated with Jew-scapegoating and hate-mongering fascism for centuries, could you? So, either you did know, and anti-semitism was coded into what you said -- whether you choose to admit it or not -- or you had no idea, and then it would seem to be obvious that you have no business pontificating upon world affairs on a board in such a conclusive manner as you do, at least without first researching what ought to be basic history for anyone blabbing on. Or, as I said, you did know, and therefore you should be put in the pit, so to speak. Edited by: <A HREF=http://p216.ezboard.com/brigorousintuition.showUserPublicProfile?gid=proldic@rigorousintuition>proldic</A> at: 10/19/05 2:06 pm

by **eric144** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 4:09 pm

""parasites directing imperialism"" That's exactly what I meant, yes. There's very good evidence indeed that it was the main motivating factor behind the Iraq war. I happen to believe 9/11 was engineered by Mossad with others. "has been traditionally associated with Jew-scapegoating and hate-mongering fascism for centuries, could you?" It wouldn't have occurred to you that the reason for some of the greastest minds in literature (Dickens, Shakespeare, Dostoevsky and so on) having similar opinions is that it's true. I do happen to know something about British nineteenth century history in this respect that I can't be bothered finding or typing. It's a big subject. There's no point in foaming at the mouth by the way, there's plenty of very similar online opinion . You'll do yourself an injury.

by **proldic** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 4:21 pm

<blockquote>Quote:<hr>It wouldn't have occurred to you that the reason for some of the greastest minds in literature (Dickens, Shakespeare, Dostoevsky and so on) having similar opinions is that it's true.<hr></blockquote> <blockquote>Quote:<hr>there's plenty of very similar online opinion<hr></blockquote> Ok, now that you lay it out so undeniably, I guess I'm wondering what -- if anything -- Jeff's going to do about this? My opinion, I think you disinfo agent guys who are willing to come right out like you do should be confined to your own "pit", and the remaining few left can actually progress in our parapolitical knowledge. I got no problem with that.

by **eric144** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 4:29 pm

"disinfo agent guys " I would guess the opinions I expressed about 9/11 and the Iraq war would be shared by the majority of people in the conspiracy lists. Are they all disinfo agents ? These forums are irrelevant, it's only when it leaks into the mainstream that for example Chertoff's cousin is wheeled out to tell lies on Art Bell. We are all insignificant here.

by **Rigorous Intuition** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 5:28 pm

for this bullshit. Or will I need to send every goddamn thread to the asbestos basement? eric144, if you see plenty of other websites welcoming antisemetic insinuations, please take your own there. proldic, please refrain from calling posters disinfo agents. If this thread continues to degenerate, I will begin deleting posts.

by **proldic** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 5:48 pm

thought that would assure your attention to this, just in case my pm didn't get it. But, it did. Obviously, I don't seriously think that eric144 is a real agent.

by **eric144** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 6:28 pm

Are you trying to imply that believing Jewish individuals in the Bush administration were the loudest voices crying for the USA to conduct a war against Iraq and were thereby largely responsible is anti-semitic ? Because if they were, that is a perfect description of a parasitic relationship. Didn't you read the furore that errupted when mainstream journalists were accused of anti-semitism for merely pointing out that Perle, Wolwowitz, Libby and so forth were Jewish. There is no question that the Israeli government would accuse you of anti-semitism for the piece below, they have accused others for much much less than that. If they thought your opinion significant, they would have threatened to sue as they did the Glasgow Herald newspaper who broke the story in the mainstream (after ABC on the day itself before it was covered up). The mention of Israelis with links to military-intelligence having been arrested on Sept 11 videotaping and celebrating the attacks, of an Israeli espionage ring surveiling DEA and defense installations and trailing the hijackers, and of a warning of impending attacks delivered to the Israeli company Odigo two hours before the first plane hit, does not deserve a response. That the stories also appeared in publications such as Ha'aretz and Forward is a sad display of self-hatred among certain elements of the Israeli media. <a href="http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2004/08/coincidence-theorists-guide-to-911.html">rigorousintuition.blogspo...o-911.html</a>

by **Rigorous Intuition** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:19 pm

You weren't referring to "Jewish individuals" when you wrote "It wouldn't have occurred to you that the reason for some of the greastest minds in literature (Dickens, Shakespeare, Dostoevsky and so on) having similar opinions is that it's true." As for the Odigo warning and the white van, I've reference them myself in the Coincidence Guide. Talk all you like about them, and the "art student" ring, and any other Mossad/Israeli Mafia ops you care to think of. But when you suggest something like, "Hey, great minds of yore believed in a Jewish conspiracy, so there must be something to it," that's just not on.

bird flu, tamiflu and the pentagon

bird flu, tamiflu and the pentagon

Re: bird flu, tamiflu and the pentagon

I can't quite decide...

Roche

BBC today

Re: BBC today

Re: BBC today

Into the Pit with Ye!

Re: Into the Pit with Ye!

Re: Into the Pit with Ye!

Re: Into the Pit with Ye!

Line in the sand time

Re: Line in the sand time

Re: Line in the sand time

Don't be disingenuous

Who is online