e-activism re Franklin Scandal

Moderators: Elvis, DrVolin, Jeff

Postby DeltaDawn » Sun Oct 25, 2009 3:03 pm

Kind of hating to jump in here right now, being a 'newbie' but....here we go! It is nice to have found a place that dares to mention RA/MC victims along with words like U.S. Intelligence, politics and although I haven't seen it yet, may I add, the military.

After a lifetime of fears, coincidences (way too many) and family dealings it became clear that I was indeed a victim of things I couldn't quite understand. Research brought me to reading about MC/RA but it just didn't fit in my life...UNtil I joined the military and experienced a change of 'handlers'..... When not being so dependent I could look and see that my entire childhood was indeed surrounded by politicians, military career people and journalists who covered only what they deemed 'important'. It's just nice to see others who have made the same observations but now more importantly???........

What to do with this information?? You certainly can't fight something that is denied, the abusers are 'untouchable' and there will never be restitution if supposedly there are no culprits. On the other hand, and this is for the (forever paranoid here) spooks who are always around shutting stories up, don't you think if victims weren't continually hassled and kept down, that they may not have such a deep need to expose the abuse? I would be perfectly happy to concentrate on stopping the present abuses, Franklin Cover up for example, if the abuse from 1950's wasn't always a stumbling block laid in the form of gaslighting and other such things.

I think what I'm saying is that victims may very well be stronger and smarter than the abusers. When I step in shit once or twice when walking in that spot in the yard?...I don't walk in that spot any more!!! If I were to harrass someone (and I never would) and they each time told something more intimate about me?.....I'd quit harrassing them!!! Yet it seems as if the abuse is lifelong.

Places like this are very important, the more stories told, the more you can validate what you believe, such as seeing the references here as to how high this abuse goes. It also helps to see what triggers others, to add them to your own list and be able to convince yourself...you've been triggered, settle down, know where it came from and do not let it 'do the job'.

I feel as if I'm coming across as falling all over myself and ranting madly, but want this to get back on track and keep learning from everyone's stories.

Peace and onward with The 'Uncovering'
For we have not been given the spirit of fear; but of love, peace and a sound mind
User avatar
DeltaDawn
 
Posts: 237
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:07 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

NOBLE

Postby sw » Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:00 pm

In my research of Larry King, I noticed that he was very plugged into the black community probably because of his boss...so I notified the National Board of Noble in D.C. that Larry King likes to rape young black boys and girls...and, is in D.C. active in the community for inner city black kid stuff.

Noble is the National Organization for Black Law Enforcement. I emailed them about Nick's book and suggested they watch for Larry King's involvement in their community there.
sw
 
Posts: 764
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 2:08 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Free » Mon Oct 26, 2009 8:00 am

DeltaDawn wrote:

Kind of hating to jump in here right now, being a 'newbie' but....here we go! It is nice to have found a place that dares to mention RA/MC victims along with words like U.S. Intelligence, politics and although I haven't seen it yet, may I add, the military.

After a lifetime of fears, coincidences (way too many) and family dealings it became clear that I was indeed a victim of things I couldn't quite understand. Research brought me to reading about MC/RA but it just didn't fit in my life...UNtil I joined the military and experienced a change of 'handlers'..... When not being so dependent I could look and see that my entire childhood was indeed surrounded by politicians, military career people and journalists who covered only what they deemed 'important'. It's just nice to see others who have made the same observations but now more importantly???........

What to do with this information?? You certainly can't fight something that is denied, the abusers are 'untouchable' and there will never be restitution if supposedly there are no culprits. On the other hand, and this is for the (forever paranoid here) spooks who are always around shutting stories up, don't you think if victims weren't continually hassled and kept down, that they may not have such a deep need to expose the abuse? I would be perfectly happy to concentrate on stopping the present abuses, Franklin Cover up for example, if the abuse from 1950's wasn't always a stumbling block laid in the form of gaslighting and other such things.

I think what I'm saying is that victims may very well be stronger and smarter than the abusers. When I step in shit once or twice when walking in that spot in the yard?...I don't walk in that spot any more!!! If I were to harrass someone (and I never would) and they each time told something more intimate about me?.....I'd quit harrassing them!!! Yet it seems as if the abuse is lifelong.

Places like this are very important, the more stories told, the more you can validate what you believe, such as seeing the references here as to how high this abuse goes. It also helps to see what triggers others, to add them to your own list and be able to convince yourself...you've been triggered, settle down, know where it came from and do not let it 'do the job'.

I feel as if I'm coming across as falling all over myself and ranting madly, but want this to get back on track and keep learning from everyone's stories.

Peace and onward with The 'Uncovering'




Yes. Eviva. Onward with the 'Uncovering'

Welcome DeltaDawn
User avatar
Free
 
Posts: 217
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:31 pm
Location: USA
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby compared2what? » Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:35 am

chiggerbit wrote:Hmmm, is pt taking the brunt of what should be a collective punishment?


No. Although I suppose if there's more to be said than that, we should do it on the other thread.
User avatar
compared2what?
 
Posts: 8383
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 6:31 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Col. Quisp » Wed Oct 28, 2009 12:23 am

sent the email and posted the link elsewhere.
User avatar
Col. Quisp
 
Posts: 1076
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:43 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby operator kos » Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:08 am

DeltaDawn wrote:Kind of hating to jump in here right now, being a 'newbie' but....here we go! It is nice to have found a place that dares to mention RA/MC victims along with words like U.S. Intelligence, politics and although I haven't seen it yet, may I add, the military.
<snip>

Welcome, DeltaDawn. I sent you a pm.
User avatar
operator kos
 
Posts: 1288
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:45 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

contacts

Postby sw » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:22 pm

Someone mentioned movie to promote Nick's book.

Good contacts to start would be Robin Williams. He bought the rights to "First Person Plural" with the intent to do a movie. He is said to have been DID as is Roseanne Barr.

Viggo Mortensen is also anti corruption movies.

I've started doing emails to agencies like CPS and CASA. Nick's book is good material for them to learn from too...
sw
 
Posts: 764
Joined: Mon May 09, 2005 2:08 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby lightningBugout » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:32 pm

Anyone who is interested can keep tabs on these Wikipedia pages:

Revision history of Franklin child prostitution ring allegations

You will note that the most recent change here is to add that Bonacci is a sex offender. IE character assassination.

Talk:Franklin child prostitution ring allegations

From the latter

According to whom is Bryant a "respected investigative journalist"? Who says that this book is "carefully researched"? I don't see any reliable 3rd-party sources for those POV statements. With statements those removed, it's just an announcement of a book release with a commercial link.


Generally speaking if you keep an eye on the users who are most egregious in blocking reasonable information around Sexual Abuse, you will find they contribute to the pages on: SRA, FMSF, as well as conspiracy stuff.[url][/url]
"What's robbing a bank compared with founding a bank?" Bertolt Brecht
User avatar
lightningBugout
 
Posts: 2515
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 3:34 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Percival » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:44 pm

The problem is that I saw this same love affair that everyone now has for Bryant for Decamp when his book first came out too and I fell for it that time now in hindsight, looking closer at Decamp tells us that he may not have been what we all thought he was at the time.

I am not willing to fall for it again. Bryant's book is a good read but I am going to rely on my own research from here on out and not put all my eggs in anyone else's basket anymore.
User avatar
Percival
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 7:09 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chiggerbit » Wed Oct 28, 2009 8:49 pm

What's the timeline on the edits, buggy? Does it fit that they might be reading here on RI?
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby lightningBugout » Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:03 pm

Not seeing anything with particularly damning correspondence lately.

The Larouche/DeCamp stuff here a few weeks back did correspond almost exactly to the addition of more about the Schiller Institute on the Franklin page.

Generally speaking there is a gang of gatekeepers who support each other well enough that they don't even need to worry about shit like RI. Biaothanatoi (wish that guy was still around here) tried for months upon months to get edits passed on the FMSF and SRA pages with almost no luck. AbuseTruth, another editor who tried to bring more balance (well, any balance) to those pages, is one of the folks blacklisted on the Newgon site.
"What's robbing a bank compared with founding a bank?" Bertolt Brecht
User avatar
lightningBugout
 
Posts: 2515
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2008 3:34 am
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby chiggerbit » Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:33 pm

The Larouche/DeCamp stuff here a few weeks back did correspond almost exactly to the addition of more about the Schiller Institute on the Franklin page.


Sorry, I'm uneducated on the wiki edit phenomenon. But is it possible that it's the Larouchies themselves doing that bit of editing? I can picture them keeping track of discussions about themselves, and them doing that kind of thing, kind of lifting their leg to take a piss on it to mark it as their territory. For them, they'd see it as a marketing ploy, not a discrediting ploy.
chiggerbit
 
Posts: 8594
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 12:23 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Postby Percival » Wed Oct 28, 2009 10:08 pm

chiggerbit wrote:
The Larouche/DeCamp stuff here a few weeks back did correspond almost exactly to the addition of more about the Schiller Institute on the Franklin page.


Sorry, I'm uneducated on the wiki edit phenomenon. But is it possible that it's the Larouchies themselves doing that bit of editing? I can picture them keeping track of discussions about themselves, and them doing that kind of thing, kind of lifting their leg to take a piss on it to mark it as their territory. For them, they'd see it as a marketing ploy, not a discrediting ploy.


The Larouchies are known, along with the Church of $cientology to be some of the most aggressive Wiki editors on the net. The employ full time staff positions to do just that, I know this because I was offered such a job by some COS associates of mine who knew my penchent for internet/legal research and wanted to use my skills. I of course told them to shove it.

Also Chiggerbittenone, re: our discussion of Ernie Chambers, I just found out that he filed a motion to expunge the GJ verdict of CC hoax at the time and he wrote an 82 page brief outlining what he felt were juror irregularities and prosecutoral misconduct during the case. I want to get my hands on that 82 page brief and have requested from the Clerk of Douglas County Court as well as Chamber's secretary.

I tried to use a little charm on the court clerk to feel her out and see what she was all about and she did mention that Franklin court records are not easy to get ahold of because a lot of them are still under court seal.

I sure would like to get ahold of Bonnaci and see if he has legal representation and wants some help filing a motion to garnish King's wages. Have we CONFIRMED yet that King is in fact working for BMW, if so we could have some fun with that. Garnish motions are easy to file.


I just applied to take the bar exam and will take it the next time it is given in late November then it takes about a month to find out if I passed which I will, then the fun can begin.
User avatar
Percival
 
Posts: 1342
Joined: Thu May 15, 2008 7:09 pm
Blog: View Blog (0)

Previous

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests